Does RuneScape need Bad Luck Mitigation

[@Naxych]

I agree! You could make an argument for nontradeble pets but i personaly like the system the way it is. It makes rare pets actualy rare.

[@New_Name_Plz]

Exactly!

[@andrewrasmussen7888]

whoever thinks this just needs to get better

[@New_Name_Plz]

OOF no holding back

[@Hal5336]

I think we shouldn't even have the Anti good luck either. Like first kill ring.

[@New_Name_Plz]

Are you referring to like drops that happen at specific kill counts?

[@Hal5336]

@New_Name_Plz i apologize I am an osrs player, in DT2 if I remember correctly you have to get the ring drop 3 total times. These rings are upgrades from Seer, Berserker, Archers ring. They added this 3 drop thing to make sure you couldn't get the ring on 1kc.

[@iamimbisile]

RS3 already has plenty of bad luck mitigation. Boss pets have thresholds, Zamorak’s drop rate increases as you go drier, you have a much higher chance at a skilling pet when you’re 200m xp in the corresponding skill. Moreover, the drop rates in RS3 are really not low. Whenever I play OSRS after an extended period on RS3, it takes a long while to adjust to the drop rates there because they’re so much lower and there is almost no bad luck mitigation. Then I come back to RS3 and hear people complaining about how rare some boss drops are and I can’t help but laugh. We have it really good in RS3 when it comes to rates.

[@New_Name_Plz]

Pet threshold are a thing yes but you can stilll go crazy dry. The Zammy one is a good example though.