No video

Does the World Need a Treaty on Business and Human Rights? Weighing the Pros and Cons

  Рет қаралды 10,801

Business & Human Rights Resource Centre

Business & Human Rights Resource Centre

10 жыл бұрын

The proposal for an international binding treaty on business and human rights is a hot topic. The Government of Ecuador proposed the treaty at the UN Human Rights Council session in September 2013 and over 80 states have supported the initiative. It has also gained the support of over 150 civil society organisations. The UN Human Rights Council in June 2014, will discuss whether and how this will progress.
Notre Dame University and the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre held a public debate on 14 May 2014 to bring together some of the academics, lawyers, activists, and business representatives, committed to furthering human rights at the core of business operations, to consider the balance of arguments for and against a treaty on business and human rights.
Debate held at Univ. Notre Dame, London campus, 14 May 2014
Programme:
Welcome: Notre Dame London Law Programme Director, Professor Geoffrey Bennett
Chair's Introduction: Phil Bloomer, Executive Director, Business and Human Rights Resource Centre
Introduction of Topic: Professor Doug Cassel, Notre Dame Law School
Proponent: Professor Chip Pitts, Stanford Law School
Commentator: Professor Sheldon Leader, Essex University
Sceptic: Chris Esdaile, Leigh Day
Commentator: Professor Nadia Bernaz, Middlesex University
Reflections: Professor Michael Addo, UN Working Group on business and human rights
Questions from the audience: Moderator, Andrea Saldarriaga, Lawyer and Lead, Investment and Human Rights
Project, Centre for the Study of Human Rights, London School of Economics
Closing remarks: Chip Pitts and Chris Esdaile
Further information and perspectives on a binding treaty on business & human rights are available at: www.business-hu...

Пікірлер: 5
@rebeccamcminn5339
@rebeccamcminn5339 10 жыл бұрын
Excellent discussion of a long-standing problem of serious national and international concern that requires multinational cooperation in a step-wise fashion based, in- part, on degree of culpability; egregiousness. Rebecca Fe de Montreve-McMinn
@nabealaramah
@nabealaramah 2 жыл бұрын
A useful add is the brave move in the Malabo protocol, which, as a first international treaty, includes corporate criminal liability
@blastechmediabusiness8714
@blastechmediabusiness8714 9 жыл бұрын
YES.
@kumaradhikari1102
@kumaradhikari1102 Жыл бұрын
Kumar Adhikari
@thisguy8258
@thisguy8258 3 жыл бұрын
I I and I
Implementing the UNGPs: Human Rights Due Diligence
7:32
InterPraxis Sustainability
Рет қаралды 9 М.
Business and Human Rights: Asia in Focus
35:45
UNDP Business and Human Rights
Рет қаралды 2,6 М.
Running With Bigger And Bigger Feastables
00:17
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 32 МЛН
Joker can't swim!#joker #shorts
00:46
Untitled Joker
Рет қаралды 37 МЛН
Lynn Hunt: Inventing Human Rights
57:06
University of California Television (UCTV)
Рет қаралды 43 М.
The Impossible Diplomacy of Human Rights
19:49
UN Human Rights
Рет қаралды 13 М.
Is International Law Effective? The Case of Russia and Ukraine
1:32:14
Robert Greene: A Process for Finding & Achieving Your Unique Purpose
3:11:18
Andrew Huberman
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
Why Leaders Lie: The Truth About Lying in International Politics with John Mearsheimer
1:25:47
EU Judicial Review - Arts 263 and 265 TFEU
23:49
marcuscleaver
Рет қаралды 44 М.
Think Fast, Talk Smart: Communication Techniques
58:20
Stanford Graduate School of Business
Рет қаралды 39 МЛН
John Mearsheimer | The liberal international order
54:16
Centre for Independent Studies
Рет қаралды 255 М.
What Should Leaders Learn from History?
28:33
World Governments Summit
Рет қаралды 335 М.
Running With Bigger And Bigger Feastables
00:17
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 32 МЛН