► Affiliate links to the Bridge Camera listed in the video ✅ 5⃣ Kodak PIXPRO AZ652: (Amazon) geni.us/0dzHw 4⃣ Canon PowerShot SX70 HS: (Amazon) geni.us/76CAzrh 3⃣ Panasonic LUMIX FZ2500: (Amazon) geni.us/O2BI 2⃣ Nikon COOLPIX P1000: (Amazon) geni.us/8l6Y 1⃣ Sony CyberShot RX10 IV: (Amazon) geni.us/qtYpj
@danielcovolo64046 ай бұрын
How about Minolta mn67z?
@LeonAllanDavis2 жыл бұрын
I used to own a bridge camera. I also had another camera with which I took pictures of everything else. Then one day a friend told me the bridge camera could be used to take pictures of other stuff. Not just bridges. Boy did I feel stupid!
@biglou76 Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@booobtooober2 жыл бұрын
#5 Kodak PIXPRO AZ652 - the lens is one of the slowest in class f2.9 - f6.7, camera is one of the heaviest in class, 1/2.3 image sensor. There are better options. #4 Canon PowerShot SX70 HS - slow lens f/3.4 - f/6.5, its price tag is in the high end of its class, 1/2.3 image sensor. There are better options for less money. #3 Panasonic LUMIX FZ2500 - decent camera, 1 inch image sensor, relatively fast lens f2.8 - f4.5, fully articulating viewfinder screen, $900 price tag is nearly half the cost of Sony RX10-IV but lags behind the RX10-IV in most if not all features. Still a very compelling camera and my 2nd choice of bridge cameras. #2 Nikon COOLPIX P1000 - It's 125X zoom is by far the leader of zoom, if you need the reach this is #1. But this camera is large, heavy, and imo image quality due to it's small 1/2.3 image sensor puts this camera at #3 #1 Sony CyberShot RX10 IV - I agree that currently this is the king of bridge cameras. It has a 1 inch sensor giving it image quality far above all other cameras with 1/2.3 sensors, it's weather and dust resistant, and has the fastest lens in class at f2.4-f4 across its zoom, But the RX10 IV has a few drawbacks. The view screen does not articulate it merely flips to an upwards angle, lacks a time lapse option, and the 25X zoom is decent but far behind most other cameras.
@weirdcheesey Жыл бұрын
I feel like 25x zoom is more than enough than what most people will ever need. Also, atmosphere distorts the image if you zoom in too much.
@gloppy101 Жыл бұрын
weight between all of them are within a few ounces. The Kodak AZ652 is the sleeper camera and a steal at $350.
@arthurgphotography Жыл бұрын
Nikon P950. Has the 83x zoom of the p900 but with RAW support and improved ergonomics. I've sold professional wildlife images with it
@Jimmy_Cavallo Жыл бұрын
@@arthurgphotography I would be curious to know what person would pay for an image from that camera with that tiny sensor and slow lens. I’ve shot side-by-side with someone that Had that up against my Sony RX 10 m3 and the image quality of bald eagles was a noticeable improvement on mine over that behemoth. I’m a dedicated Nikon DSLR user for over 20 years and I’m a professional portrait photographer
@arthurgphotography Жыл бұрын
@@Jimmy_Cavallo the IQ is very good if you can keep ISO low. I've owned the RX 10 m4 before but it didn't do well with birds. The P950 beats other cameras in some situations simply because you don't have to crop even with birds. At 2000mm equivalent under ideal conditions it's excellent paired with post denoising software like topaz
@toke7560 Жыл бұрын
I have a Panosonic FZ 330. A decent all in one. I tried out a sony mkIv. Was shocked at the focus speed. If it wasn't so expensive this is the one i would choose.
@RetrieverTrainingAlone4 ай бұрын
For a bridge camera, I like an optical zoom>=50x, fastest shutter speed >=1/4000, shutter triggered via phone app, water and dust resistent, raw image format
@eddyg1794 Жыл бұрын
These aren't reviews they are infomercials. Thumbs down
@chankooncheng Жыл бұрын
I was surprised the Nikon p 950 was not listed!
@Jimmy_Cavallo Жыл бұрын
I know two different people that shoot with that camera, and I have never seen a sharp image come from either one of them. The sensor is too small.
@konarr7158 Жыл бұрын
@@Jimmy_Cavallowhat is a better alternative to this camera? I want to zoom but with the larger sensor, being guided towards fz1000 ii for example but think it's a different bridge altogether
@dare2dream-musicproduction1307 ай бұрын
Hi thank you for your videos, what would be a good camera for night, and shade time, with a great zoom . ( I picked in the past the Canon PowerShot SX70 HS for it Zoom ) but it does not do well at night time. I never took pictures in my life but since I moved on the water. I am addicted ! Thank you in advance for any suggestions.
@MrConsto11 ай бұрын
So the Sony RX10 had only one negative but it wasn’t that it is almost twice that of the negative pricey Nikon p1000?
@Gr8putin6 ай бұрын
Thats the only reason why i settled with sx 70hs
@rjrex82 жыл бұрын
Canon PowerShot Sx70 HS
@elego49 Жыл бұрын
After weeks of research, I still can't decide. They all have compromises, even the highest priced. Don't you wish we didn't have so many options?
@whiteshadow1771 Жыл бұрын
Too many choices are a hinderance. NPR, not sure of the year, had a spot on "this American life" where they discussed the debilitating affects of too many choices. It was interesting.
@Jimmy_Cavallo Жыл бұрын
All I can say is that I hope you went with the Sony and this is coming from a Diehard Nikon DSLR user of over 20 years shooting professionally
@MrBillkaz2 жыл бұрын
Rx10 4 is 👑
@Jimmy_Cavallo Жыл бұрын
1000% coming from a Diehard Nikon DSLR shooter of over 20 years
@maurickcook Жыл бұрын
P1000 is my number #1
@bigbarkingdog20107 ай бұрын
Good bridge camera overview.
@johndonaldson51262 жыл бұрын
I have better cameras but we bought a Panasonic FZ1000 used for $350. We use it on our boat where I wouldn't take my expensive cameras. The Panasonic is only good in well lighted situations but it constantly surprises me producing quite good photo images. A bridge camera is a good entry point for a new photographer. Full auto, shutter speed, aperture, and full manual controls make for an inexpensive training camera.
@arthurgphotography Жыл бұрын
I used to own one it was great. They later made an FZ1000 mark ii with some updates
@briw46472 жыл бұрын
obviously kodak paid you to add that camera there, otherwise, you really need to relook at your list
@LISTEDGames Жыл бұрын
Why do I feel like these videos were made by an AI. Very corporate and clinical..
@TheOfficialiSub9 ай бұрын
I would love a bridging camera but refuse to buy any new tech that doesn’t have USB-C and from what I can tell, no bridging camera has USB-C. Think I’ll get the Sony a6700
@alis1079Ай бұрын
fz80d came out lately and has usb-c
@TheOfficialiSubАй бұрын
@@alis1079I saw! It’s not bad. No stock here yet
@msgupta262 жыл бұрын
You have not mentioned a very important specification: sensor size!
@TechsYouCantLiveWithout2 жыл бұрын
You’re right! Thanks 🙏
@giulianamonticolo68927 ай бұрын
Io ho la kodak az425 è super
@sjuro54 Жыл бұрын
The Sony LACKS focus?!? hahaha!!
@DavidRodriguez-hg6kq Жыл бұрын
Kodak sold the name brand to other company.
@josephguo34292 жыл бұрын
kodak? forget it.
@josephbrady67602 жыл бұрын
what is a bridge camera????
@fickfock81692 жыл бұрын
. kodacs 65× zoom is not optical zoom.
@josephguo34292 жыл бұрын
poor quality
@garyausten59392 жыл бұрын
People on Ugly Hedgehog (where I'm a member) agreed with the Sony. I could rent it for my upcoming trip to France/Switzerland, but I've decided to take my regular camera instead. A new RX10IV costs about as much as a premium lens for my DSLR to buy and the rental costs saved would get me extra souvenirs, nicer meals or optional side trips. I bought a used Panasonic FZ200 for a trip to Israel 6 yes ago. The range was great, but I was unhappy with the IQ I got from 12MP (and only if I shot RAW) and limited f/stop options.
@weiwei-fq2xd2 жыл бұрын
Nikon p1000 👍
@josephguo34292 жыл бұрын
too costly. not worth.
@Gamehighlight20232 жыл бұрын
I want one, but the only thing that deserve teh money are the lenses giving you the extreme zoom other than thet it is TRASH ! After all there years I am standing with SONY, their picture quality is crisp.
@josephguo34292 жыл бұрын
my kodak bridge camera died after few years, flimsy quality, no more.