Don't fall for quantum hype

[@lellyparker]

Quantum Hype is when you can't know the level of the hype at the same time as knowing what all the hype is about.

[@sarenareth689]

I am both hyped and bored at the same time, you just gotta catch me in the moment to find out what I really feel.

[@PrivateSi]

I do think a ONE SHOT FTL comms device is possible, but it's so ridiculously silly to implement not even hyper-advanced civilisation would use them... First you have to move a matrix of entangles particles from their co-particles... Each broken connection = 1 bit of information, and the observers at point a break a connection on the matrix which is instantly picked up the other end, signifying something the two parties have pre-agreed... -- On top of this we have the digital-analogue time factor. We could have a protocol that says, break each connection every 512 Planck ticks, with an offset 0..255 Planck seconds, thus transfer 256 bits of data every 512 Planck ticks.. Like I say, the problem is, it's one shot for each entangled pair, and the device has to be transported to the location first.. -- depends on whether QE can REALLY be stretched and maintained over long distance... if it's only possible a short distance, as I suspect, it's a ridiculous silly thing to do.

[@carnsoaks1]

funny!

[@DrDeuteron]

so instead going "|100>", you're like..."I'm like in Greenland on the Bloch-Sphere".

[@ДаниилРабинович-б9п]

@@PrivateSi so, how would you detect that a connection is broken?

[@xencloud]

This channel should be called "Realistic Expectations"

[@ZardoDhieldor]

I think "Science without the gobbledygook" is already better.

[@gmouraangra]

Yes , petition for that !!

[@SpectatorAlius]

But then the realistic expectation for how many viewers would click on it would be depressingly low! No, she picked a much better title: there really is a lot of "quantum hype" floating around. And because the hype itself gets it power of attraction from the word 'quantum', now the realistic expectation is for many more clicks.

[@mrJety89]

I predict that Quantum Meteorology will be very big in 50 years.

[@Me_549]

@@mrJety89 Quantum metrology*

[@mariabou7178]

In Greece a very prominent TV personality has come out with a "Quantum Diet". I wish I was kidding.

[@x000s2]

You are fat, and not fat at the same time, just don't look in the mirror

[@wowshamanful]

@@x000s2 You increase or decrease your mass at will via ladder operators.

[@garyloewenthal]

"Reduce the Quantity of Tummy with the Quantum Diet."

[@eddycolon1986]

@@garyloewenthal HAHAHAHA

[@ramdas363]

Sounds like a Greek Deepak Chupra.

[@billscott1601]

Wait, are you telling me the Daily Mail isn’t a good source for science articles?

[@ZardoDhieldor]

Yeah, better read the Sun.

[@mrJety89]

I predict that Quantum Meteorology will be very big in 50 years.

[@francisco9999]

My reference source for such kind of information is "News of the World", in pair with the Daily Mirror. Some years ago it was "The Sun", but as soon as it disagreed with the Copenhagen Interpretation, I stopped to read it

[@harriehausenman8623]

No. It's just the same level we reached here.

[@tonydarcy1606]

Aye ! The JW's Watchtower is far better science based !

[@Thanatip2004BMZ]

Studying physics, putting Quantum in front of things feels like a meme at this point

[@cannaroe1213]

quantumlol

[@ShadowManceri]

I would make a quantum joke, but you would not get it or it would not be funny.

[@sonGOKU-gy7rg]

quantum memes👍

[@Furiends]

The Quantum meme of memes.

[@Mefistofy]

Same with machine learning or AI, when you specialize in signal processing. AI is just a placeholder for "We don't quite know why but it somewhat works if we throw massive amount of computation power at it."

[@prasadmanic]

For some reason it feels good when someone comes along and utterly shatters hype. Especially if the hype is positive.

[@leektid4624]

Always get that mate. I'm excited about it and what she says literally means nothing to me, she talks crap. I have confidence this will have great good for us all in time 👍

[@SzaboB33]

actually, having quantum safe cryptography that can be used with silicon computers is great news which I did not know

[@koumei1709]

@@SzaboB33 lol are you related to nick szabo

[@steviejohnson378]

She’s a particle physicist. She’s going to be salty lol

[@howmathematicianscreatemat9226]

@@leektid4624 so we have another potential Nobel prize candidate here, I assume? So are you saying she is wrong about the light speed limit of particle communication?

[@ludlowworthington697]

I hope the hype about quantum baking isn't overblown. I was hoping to have my cake and eat it too.

[@cridr]

too late, because " the cake is a lie" :)

[@mito._]

Born too late to explore the world. Born too early to explore the universe.

[@rajaramadas2655]

👌🏾👋🏾👋🏾

[@irokosalei5133]

That's funny because there is a video about photons entanglement that uses cake bakery as a metaphor. It presents two cakes going out of the factory at the same time on opposite trendmills. Experimenter on each side can choose between two tests : magnesium presence and taste. One test will invalidate testing of the other. When one cake had magnesium, the other tasted good. In 9% of times both had magnesium. Logic tells they should be both good in at least 9% of cases. But they were never good at the same time. And this defies logic (at least in a causal, local and realist framework). I guess people really like cakes.

[@BillClinton228]

I need more quantum in my quantum so I can quantum on my quantum.

[@atklm1]

Sci-Fi movies used to have "photon" as a buzzword that explains magic. Then it was nanotech, that explained the magic. Now the new word is "quantum". I wonder when they switch to quarks...

[@quantumpolariton122]

The photon, the nano, and the quark even is all actually quantum, blad!

[@Smo1k]

They already did. Quark is a spin-off (Ooh, I think we have spotted the hitherto unknown puntrino!) of the Valhalla animated movies...

[@sabatino1977]

We should ask Muster Mark.

[@sadattahmeed7462]

What about Dark Matter? xD

[@MyScorpion42]

@@Smo1k Actually, I learned the other day that his name refers to a scandinavian yoghurt product xD

[@s700wattsyoung8]

After looking through your video list, I believe you should do a video on quantum entanglement. I think that’s where the confusion of faster than light information transmission is derived from.

[@PomegranatePublisher]

I think you hit the nail on the head

[@astridmartin3736]

yea thats exactly where its coming from

[@Bobbel888]

Recently listened to "The String Theory Iceberg EXPLAINED", an extensive display of String Theory aspects and there entanglement plausibly appears as wormholes.

[@alancham4]

I love this lady. Straight forward, no bull. And she calmly eviscerates science reporting and her contemporaries when they stray

[@josepharmstrong6852]

100% agree so sound :)love these vids

[@born2bbald12]

She is a very smart lady but she is merely fairly consistent within her own discipline. Science has its limits. Science is a fabulous thing. It has benefited mankind in many ways BUT it is limited. It is based on some assumptions, conventions and just plain arbitrary conclusions that impress many scientists...but not all. Science is an evolutionary philosophy. It will viscously defend what it proclaims to be true......until some really smart person will come up with something that makes current "truth" obsolete! Copernicus did that. Newton did that, as did Einstein and Hawking, and so forth. They blew things up! Some of them even said they maid boo boos! Einstein did. Sow did Hawking. Don't get me wrong. Science has come a long way, we are greatly blessed/benefited by it. However, our "knowledge" is limited and sometimes way off. My concern is when science becomes arrogant with some of its declarations. My favorite example is where the _consensus_ of scientific thought is when the Big Bang Theory is presented as dogmatic truth. It isn't. In fact, it carries many contradictions. I won't get into that here. My point is that there are many scientists that disagree with many, and some times, all points with the Big Bang Theory. In the popular science community they are neglected or even ignored. That's my problem. Now Sabine is a very smart lady. She has a knack for explaining things. But, sometimes she is off. I will not say she is off about the Quantum thing in this video. I'm just making a general statement...in general...generally, speaking! When ANYONE dismissively says something is nonsense red flags fly. To me it is arrogant. All she is saying is that she disagrees, but arrogantly. Not good. Sabine isn't "eviscerating" anyone. She is merely disagreeing. Careful! Some people, in the comments below, seem to be overly impressed with her. Careful!

[@marcusviniciusdoprado7508]

@ BaldOldMan The big difference with science is that, anyone with reason, validated arguments and experiments, can dish the current state of the art. You mentioned the most common names, but the way they based their theories were more like an extension and not a complete reamagining

[@paxwallacejazz]

She's not all there only mind. I lived in Germany for 9yrs. I've encountered this. But I keep checking her out.. and so far it's all good sorta.

[@paxwallacejazz]

@@born2bbald12 you aren't correct. Newton is how NASA functions not Einstein really. Einstein is how truly Space Fareing civilisations function but we aren't that currently. Newtonian mechanics landed Man on the moon. Nothing got blown up by Einstein. The next paradigm isn't the destroyer of the last it just reveals how the old paradigm wasn't complete. This is the imperfect nature of human knowledge. Watch knowledge or Certainty by Jacob Brownski from " The Ascent of Man" Science is actually intrinsically humble regardless of it's practioners.

[@ryanprice9841]

You're so smart that I almost confuse myself with someone who can understand any of this while you are explaining it.

[@JohnVKaravitis]

Then why do you come here?

[@johng7602]

@@JohnVKaravitis don't act like u understand.all this alrigght

[@jamiegagnon6390]

Yep, it all makes sense when she says it, but I just can't get the quantum words to make the same sense coming out of my mouth. I just refer folks to the videos...

[@harriehausenman8623]

There is another explanation ;-)

[@Mortum_Rex]

I'm the same. I still listen because it's fascinating, and I still do get the gist of the subject and end up more grounded in my lamen's understanding. Knowing the key points of contention when fighting pseudoscience and dangerous ignorance is important, even if you dont have in depth knowledge yourself. You can still call bullshit, and then direct the person to references.

[@LiftPizzas]

"I'm good at math and science, so I became a reporter" said Nobody Ever.

[@cryptic7791]

@Miles please stop Christ is no longer king atheism is unstoppable so move on, if you are scared of death and want eternal life look into cryonics

[@justiceiria869]

@@cryptic7791 no need for that, we live by grace through faith.

[@cryptic7791]

@@justiceiria869 ah yes believe with no proof 😉

[@justiceiria869]

@@cryptic7791 proof can be anything, but there is only one truth. I believe because the bible speaks the truth. You clearly don't believe but my question to you is this. Is your believe true?

[@cryptic7791]

@@justiceiria869 no because science evolves it’s not a conclusion and the Bible was written by men

[@catfish3069]

I'm happy to see my hype getting destroyed, I feel like I'm growing up

[@harriehausenman8623]

don't worry, it's just the counter-hype. It will also go away after a while.

[@ffmfg]

welcome to the post-hype lounge. we have cookies and peer-reviewed research papers.

[@zubstep]

Beware, the deconstruction of hype is followed by the reconstruction of hype. The hype must flow.

[@mikicerise6250]

She's just saying all that because the Oumuamuans forced her to.

[@frankdimeglio8216]

THE ULTIMATE AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF OF THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA: Ultimately and truly, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. SO, time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Great !!! "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS F=MA. Consider the man who IS standing on what is the EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; as E=mc2 IS F=ma. GREAT !!! E=mc2 IS F=ma. The linked AND BALANCED opposite of what is THE SUN is A POINT in the night sky. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Therefore, the linked AND BALANCED opposite of what is THE EARTH is ALSO A POINT in the night sky. Great. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the Earth AND the Sun are linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Great !!!!!! Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. E=MC2 IS F=MA. The EARTH and the SUN thus constitute and comprise what are the MIDDLE AND THE FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE (IN BALANCE) in full and BALANCED compliance and conformity with the CLEAR and universal fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great !!!! It ALL CLEARLY does make perfect sense. (The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky.) INDEED, BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. Now, very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. Great. NOW, OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. Notice the black space of THE EYE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. THE DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. Now, carefully consider what is the semi-spherical, translucent, QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL, AND BLUE SKY. Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is CLEAR. THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE (AS WATER). GREAT. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, as E=mc2 IS F=ma; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/energy, as this unifies AND balances gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy; as this balances gravity AND inertia. (This clearly explains BOTH F=ma AND E=mc2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY !!!) ACCORDINGLY, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, the BALANCE of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Our EXPERIENCE is NECESSARILY that of what is the FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE, AS we are BALANCED between what are THE SUN AND c (A POINT); AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. SO, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal areas in equal times; AND this is THEN consistent WITH/as F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is perpetual motion; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mc2 IS F=ma. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY does make perfect sense. THINK about what is QUANTUM GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Indeed, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Therefore, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution !!! Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravitational force/ENERGY is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Magnificent !!! E=mc2 IS F=ma. Is a two dimensional surface or SPACE visible or invisible ? The answer is that it is BOTH. So, the electron AND photon are structureless. A PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) is a balanced MIDDLE DISTANCE form in relation to E=mc2 AS F=ma. A PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) is a balanced MIDDLE DISTANCE form in relation to the Sun AND c (A POINT). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=MA. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. E=MC2 IS F=MA. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. The BALANCE of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) It is a very great truth that THE SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. MOREOVER, the ability of THOUGHT to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. Beautiful. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. E=mc2 IS F=ma. By Frank DiMeglio

[@ParthGChannel]

You're a phenomenal teacher Sabine!

[@ankansenapati2144]

You are also 👻

[@frankdimeglio8216]

WHY HABITUAL AND SELFISH LIARS SUCH AS BRIAN GREENE, SABINE HOSSENFELDER, AND DAVID SPERGEL ARE PART OF A MUCH WIDER AND SINISTER NIGHTMARE THAT IS RAPIDLY UNFOLDING: We always begin with typical, common, and ordinary experience in establishing physical FUNDAMENTALS/truths. LIFE is about living. TEACH REAL PHYSICS. E=mc2 IS F=ma. The truth is the way. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Modern physics is BIG BUSINESS that is far more concerned with making money than it is with making sense and TRULY helping people IN GENERAL. THINK. They have their business equipment (telescopes, rockets, war making/destructive devices, nuclear power, nuclear pollution/waste, particle colliders, satellites, microscopes, etc.) and their other business practices (e.g., courses, books, tuition, "peer" "review") that they use to "corner the market" on what they then sell and present to you as legitimate and "ESSENTIAL" business products and "truths". They make ENORMOUS amounts of MONEY by changing experience from what is natural. In other words, to a very disturbing and significant extent, they are FABRICATING reality and the "truth" along with it. HOWEVER, TRUTH, reality, AND nature/natural experience go hand in hand. FACT. Indeed, if we walk away from reality, reality walks away from us. (STOP watching television.) In fact, the big picture is ESSENTIAL. It is called having common sense. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. INDEED, the big question is who is TRULY and actually "BENEFITTING" from all of this; and for what reasons? For example, are our tax dollars actually being utilized WISELY? Indeed, is being a BILLIONAIRE actually and truly representative or constitutive of philanthropy !!? NO, IT IS NOT. Climate change/environmental destruction IS VERY REAL, and it is absolutely catastrophic. Stop the rip-offs, the lies/liars, the delusional nonsense, the speculative fantasies, wasteful environmental destruction, the fear mongering, the escapist hysteria, the clowning around, and OUR BEING DELIBERATELY AND DECEITFULLY DUMBED DOWN REGARDING WHAT IS OUR PRECIOUS AND TRULY PRICELESS PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE. By Frank DiMeglio

[@howmathematicianscreatemat9226]

You can also be in the field of your biggest strength and once you truly ask yourself how people learn.

[@ohdude6643]

"What'd you expect from the Daily Mail?" -- exactly

[@silverfang6668]

“It’s just wrong!” Don’t hold back, Sabine, tell us how you really feel!

[@daoist88]

Hey Miles, trolling is for air heads.

[@winfriedwilcke1705]

@Miles Doyle What the heck has this to do with quantum science?

[@frankdimeglio8216]

@@winfriedwilcke1705 THE ULTIMATE, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF REGARDING THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA: Time dilation ultimately proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Great !!!! QUANTUM GRAVITY !!!! E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. What are the EARTH/ground AND the SUN are CLEARLY E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It does ALL CLEARLY make perfect sense. GOT IT !!!! THE SKY is BLUE, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. Great !!! Now, think about the man who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Perfect !!!! By Frank DiMeglio

[@winfriedwilcke1705]

@@frankdimeglio8216 what are you talking about? Oh, never mind.

[@infinitytoinfinitysquaredb7836]

An old joke: Fusion power has been "30 years away" for 50 years.

[@thealmightyaku-4153]

That's because, as this graphic shows:www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/5gi9yh/fusion_is_always_50_years_away_for_a_reason/ funding for fusion research has decreased steadily-to-rapidly every year since the 70s. Funnily enough, the person giving this lecture: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gZzTonRurqxsipY and his students, have since gone on to found Commonwealth Fusion Systems, after the fusion research reactor at MIT, Alcator C-Mod, was shut down after its experiment budget was eliminated, and aim to get a small, Q>1 reactor going sometime this year, using the revolutionary new superconductors he talks about in that very lecture.

[@halneufmille]

Funnily enough, the real joke may be that this joke will be retired within a few years. Look at here for instance: kzbin.info/www/bejne/m4rFf4adirabmrs

[@Alex_Plante]

more like 20 years away for 70 years

[@wayoutdan8334]

Also: Lasers are the weapons of the future...and they always will be...

[@infinitytoinfinitysquaredb7836]

@@halneufmille "within a few years"?? You obviously didn't read those articles I gave you.

[@liefdeltora3088]

This is an EXCELLENT video. I'm an undergrad currently taking intro quantum mechanics and this is all spot on. Refreshing to see a science communicator really get it and still stay paletteable

[@david203]

"Paletteable": the ability of a person to have a color palette as an intrinsic property.

[@potman4581]

@@david203 lmao

[@Shozamy]

Hello! How is your intro quantum mechanics going?

[@kennylex]

Quantum technology is to find a new way to transport cats in a safe way, the old way to put them in a box together with a radioactive isotope is still a bit to risky.

[@k0lpA]

How do you know its risky ? you were not supposed to open the box

[@privateemail9755]

@@k0lpA x-ray? or heat radar?

[@humanoid2423]

@@privateemail9755 doesn't matter how you look at it, it's the fact that you're looking at it.

[@kakyoindonut3213]

I don't know how to pronounce schrodigger

[@shilohv]

Schrodinger‘s cat never actually existed... Or did it?

[@luudest]

10 years ago everthing was ‚nano‘. now everything is ‚quantum‘.

[@peter.g6]

Once again we have to give credit to the early Simpsons episodes. There, in season 10 in 1998 it was revealed that Kang and Kodos are Quantum Presbyterians. They sure knew where the future was heading.

[@DrunkenUFOPilot]

Seems goofy to us physicists, since quantum mechanics, quantum this and quantum that, up and down states, tensor products of Hilbert spaces, ho-hum, all that has been around for many decades. It's the practical application to metrology, networking and computing that's new and interesting. Adding "quantum" only makes it sound old, to certain pairs of ears!

[@georgesolomon9505]

And after another 10 years?

[@studentdz6832]

@@georgesolomon9505 Strings and stuff...

[@Danuxsy]

@@georgesolomon9505 Cybernetics

[@HideoV]

Very useful video. There is a slight issue wit the quantum internet section however. When stating that the "quantum internet would be safe from quantum computers", meaning quantum key distribution (QDK) would be, this is not a complete picture. QDK is an unauthenticated protocol. In order to attain what's usually undestood as "security" on the internet (say, what TLS gives you), a post-quantum signature scheme would still be required. Therefore the quantum internet will still need some form of post-quantum cryptography even in the best case, as far as it is currently understood. Not to talk about the huge scalability issues of having to re-deploy an entire world communication infrastructure, which is also conveniently not mentioned explicitly by many of the people working on QDK. There's more important things to spend public funds on than this.

[@guest_informant]

Do you fall for quantum hype? Well, yes and no

[@fastend]

Yo

[@sersentir2999]

Collapsing will be yes or no.

[@RaphaelBraun]

I have to say, this channel is one of the best things on the internet that I know of. Thank you so much for the effort!

[@johnsmith-zh1bt]

and she sings too!

[@harriehausenman8623]

You should check your internet.

[@appl3moji]

i love your channel so much...as a first year physics student you are one of the few physicists that has shown me a realistic and logical approach to certain contemporary physics that i’ve yet to learn, when i saw your book i had to buy a copy right away!!

[@paddle_shift]

Wormholes are real, I just have to go out in my yard and see them wormholing away.

[@BWChambers]

How I wish I could sit across a table from you and just have a great conversation and ask questions. You're such an amazing scientist! Please keep up the good work!

[@AttilaAsztalos]

Be extremely weary of strongly opinionated people who have all the answers. No single person, no matter how smart or well informed has all the right ones.

[@ashertoh7097]

i love this channel. She is fascinating and clever.

[@Heavygusto]

Every time i see a Hitchhiker's Guide reference, it warms my heart a little bit.

[@Finnec123]

42. Loved that too.

[@ivanmilenkovic8285]

It gave me a big smile :) Brilliant.

"So what stonks did you say we should be buying Sabine?"

[@LuisAldamiz]

Quantum stonks, everything is better with "quantum" as adjective, even "stonks" (whatever they may be).

[@jonashartmann6687]

Can we then call it quonks instead?

[@jeremybyington]

Quantum Blockchain, Inc.

[@jamiegagnon6390]

@@LuisAldamiz I love quantum pancakes, even if I have to use regular maple syrup....

[@OboeCanAm]

@@jeremybyington You beat me to it by a few seconds!! Adding the terms "blockchain" and "quantum" to anything will increase it's value.

[@mademoisellet6400]

I have no links to the science field whatsoever, and yet, I just love listening to you!

[@hooberdog1]

“What do you expect from the Daily Mail” 😂 that would make the best t shirt. With bullshit in large letters on the other side.

[@ShopperPlug]

LMFAOOO

[@Hmdunnonotsureyet]

yes, yes, 100x yes

[@ChaoteekPenguin]

I feel like the real hype begins when you do actually start understanding these things!

[@jmitterii2]

That's why she needn't worry about the "hype". Nobody understands if whatever was written about QM computer was being hyped or not anyway.

[@david203]

I wish that were true. Ignorant people just love to pretend to understand complicated stuff. It's called ego.

[@vhawk1951kl]

What is understanding? Why do men (human beings) suppose all matter to be composed of tiny mice? Actually it was a chap calledMakeitupasyougoalongidedes that came up with the idea that everything was composed of tiny mice that is now accepted by all men (human beings) with very few exceptions, although there are some that wonder why one cannot see these tiny mice of which all matter is supposedly composed, but I think I might have seen one out of the corner of my eye one day, and I once met a chap called Einstein who had a cat that he called Relativity because it reminded him of his relatives, and he told me that he had been shown a photograph of the tiny mice would compose all matter, and when I pointed out that it was hard to see that whatever it was in the photograph were tiny mice, he assured me that the tiny mice are very small indeed, and themselves composed of even smaller tiny mice, and that someone had told him that tiny mice live on some sort of cheese known as quarks, which is made from the milk produced by what are called muons, which look rather like bison, but then again these things are so tiny that no one can see them or attach them or feel them or any other way establish that they are anything other than imaginary, but nevertheless, men (human beings) are so credulous that they will believe anything they are told without ever seeking to verify for themselves, so it is no surprise that they dream up all sorts of fantastic ideas such as the tiny mice theory of matter, no matter how fanciful it may be. Five gives you 5 million billion trillion that one day some chap will boldly assert that in fact however valid that tiny mice theory of matter may be, in fact those tiny mice are themselves composed of even tinier rabbits, themselves composed of remarkably small hedgehogs, and no doubt everyone nod their heads sagely and say: " of course, now why didn't we think of that in the first place?"

[@nichsulol4844]

@@david203 42 but also can be infitine time stronger ever

[@klelllawrence6528]

Straightforward, openly, and blazingly honest without a single ounce of hubris. Explanations I can understand without any scientific background too? I love what you offer in your videos. Thank you seems insufficient. Yet, it's all I have.

[@divyajyoti1631]

Coming from a fellow physicist, this is a much needed video

[@bighairyfeet]

Nobody asked you

[@darrenhenderson6921]

I bet your like an actor who parrots science like the cast of the big bang, when it comes to original cutting edge science and math, you are useless, only a handful of physicists in history really understand quantum field theory and applications of quantum entanglement. You don't even know what light is.

[@benceszabo5515]

@Divyajyoti I agree however im still very much interested and curious about undiscovered part of quantum mechanics. :33

[@bighairyfeet]

Lmmfao

[@abhijeet4799]

@Miles stfu

[@Brassard1985]

Regardless, quantum technology is still in its cradle with a very bright future ahead. Despite its present limitations in terms of scalability, the hype isn’t unjustified. Quantum technology seems to be one of the few things that we can actually be optimistic about now days lol.

[@mikeb3769]

Yeah, the only problem with the hype is that people think we are close to having functional quantum computers. We will get there, but almost everyone in the commercial field is overblowing their current capabilities or timescales

[@Bradgilliswhammyman]

@@mikeb3769 I think SAbine is underestimating the leaps in technology that will occur. We only have 100 cubit now, but you can do real work with a 1000 cubit quantum computer and we might hit that in less than 5 years.

[@chives240]

Wasnt the point of the video, or what she meant by that.

[@Brassard1985]

@@chives240 I believe that the title of the video is “Don’t fall for the quantum hype”. Maybe you watched a different video. It’s okay. We can’t all be winners. You’re the kind of person that sits in a dark room and scrolls through the comment section on KZbin videos looking to make unnecessary contrarian comments.

[@Brassard1985]

@the actually false. The original comment was not contrarian, and I don’t believe that anyone besides you would suggest that. The goal was to merely continue to discussion. A fair amount of people appear to agree with me.

[@stingray427]

thx for term "between" 0 and 1. When I've started watching videos about quantum computing few years ago I just couldn't figure what so special about be 0 and 1 being "both" :D I assumed it could be simulated with 3rd state and here we go

[@JavierAlbinarrate]

3:20 "They have experimentally tested that fusion theories work" deserves the Oscar to understatements.

[@juanausensi499]

Yeah... she could have done a more 'explosive' affirmation...

[@1111MJR]

‘...and, really, what would you expect from the Daily Mail.’ I think I just fell in love.

[@peterfaulkner6798]

subbed bc ofc. first video from sabine that i've seen; brilliant, funny, informative, no bs. this is a gem, folks.

[@KristyandMarcus]

Today on KZbin, I watched a debate you participated in, followed by an interview of you. You're an interesting individual, to say the least. Quite inspiring & strangely intriguing.

[@KarlBunker]

> "strangely intriguing" Just say "hot," like the rest of us do.

[@ianvaughan9028]

This was such an interesting video. All your videos are excellent but this one was full of information that I personally was unaware of.

[@frankdimeglio8216]

Hossenfelder is knowingly and deceitfully lying about physics. THE ULTIMATE AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF OF THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA: Ultimately and truly, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. SO, time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Great !!! "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS F=MA. Consider the man who IS standing on what is the EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; as E=mc2 IS F=ma. GREAT !!! E=mc2 IS F=ma. The linked AND BALANCED opposite of what is THE SUN is A POINT in the night sky. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Therefore, the linked AND BALANCED opposite of what is THE EARTH is ALSO A POINT in the night sky. Great. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the Earth AND the Sun are linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Great !!!!!! Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. E=MC2 IS F=MA. The EARTH and the SUN thus constitute and comprise what are the MIDDLE AND THE FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE (IN BALANCE) in full and BALANCED compliance and conformity with the CLEAR and universal fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great !!!! It ALL CLEARLY does make perfect sense. (The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky.) INDEED, BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. Now, very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. Great. NOW, OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. Notice the black space of THE EYE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. THE DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. Now, carefully consider what is the semi-spherical, translucent, QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL, AND BLUE SKY. Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is CLEAR. THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE (AS WATER). GREAT. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, as E=mc2 IS F=ma; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/energy, as this unifies AND balances gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy; as this balances gravity AND inertia. (This clearly explains BOTH F=ma AND E=mc2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY !!!) ACCORDINGLY, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, the BALANCE of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Our EXPERIENCE is NECESSARILY that of what is the FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE, AS we are BALANCED between what are THE SUN AND c (A POINT); AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. SO, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal areas in equal times; AND this is THEN consistent WITH/as F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is perpetual motion; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mc2 IS F=ma. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY does make perfect sense. THINK about what is QUANTUM GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Indeed, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Therefore, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution !!! Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravitational force/ENERGY is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Magnificent !!! E=mc2 IS F=ma. Is a two dimensional surface or SPACE visible or invisible ? The answer is that it is BOTH. So, the electron AND photon are structureless. A PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) is a balanced MIDDLE DISTANCE form in relation to E=mc2 AS F=ma. A PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) is a balanced MIDDLE DISTANCE form in relation to the Sun AND c (A POINT). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=MA. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. E=MC2 IS F=MA. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. The BALANCE of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) It is a very great truth that THE SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. MOREOVER, the ability of THOUGHT to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. Beautiful. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. E=mc2 IS F=ma. By Frank DiMeglio

[@adeled8833]

I love your voice and speech speed and the information you give. It is really inspiring and soothing. This is all a perfect teacher needs

[@douglasdrane4489]

Sabine Hossenfelder is fast becoming one of my favorite KZbin artists in the field of Physics and Science .

[@bhangrafan4480]

The fame of the "Daily Mail" reaches far! Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre has been selected to run the broadcasting regulator Ofcom. This tells you everything you need to know about the mass media in the UK.

[@owdpotter7597]

according to John Cleese, Dacre has had an arse hole transplant, but the arse hole rejected him

[@BigJuice69]

Tell me again about the "leftist media"

[@erichstocker8358]

What a nice expose of hype! New technologies are always hyped because that way you can get more funding for the research. You promise the funding agency great results and then you get funding. I don't know how many proposal I have reviewed that promised great things and didn't even deliver a paper for publication. You get the media involved in this and it great accelerates the hype. You explained the purposes and status of these quantum techniques very nicely. Thank you.

[@liammurphy2725]

"Wormholes are not serious science" I've waited so long to hear that. Sabine has a subtle form of self expression.

[@seanbirtwistle649]

I wonder if that was a trump initiative...

[@joseluisrosales4104]

Wormholes are interesting mathematical constructs of general relativity, for instance, in order to check the validity of the positive energy statement in classical physics (The Penrose-Hawking requirement for a blackhole). Quantum mechanically this positive energy statement is allowed to be inflinged during the Quantum uncertainty period. This may generate spontaneous wormholes at the Planck scale. Anyway there aren't absolute claims of what is good or bad Science. There are well or not well done inquiries. Science has not a Pope who tell what is correct or incorrect.

[@havenbastion]

There are no cheat codes on the universe.

[@eswn1816]

@@seanbirtwistle649 No, actually bumbling Joe is still looking for it... Thinking it's where he stashed away some of his hidden cash... 🥺

[@jonashartmann6687]

The way I see it is that black holes were thought to be mathematical artifacts as well and wouldn't exist in the real world. But here we are taking pictures of them... So you never know until you know. It's the same how I think about glueballs from QCD. They may not exist but so far we do not have enough information about the topic to rule them out.

[@TheEarthCreature]

I'm glad to have watched this and learned that I actually had realistic expectations for these technologies.

[@kokomanation]

But in the future we don’t know where this technology can reach .Scientists always find ways to overcome any possible difficulty and make impossible technologies become reality in the future.

[@thewiirocks]

Thank you for clearly explaining that QuBits have an analog value during computation and not "both" 1 and 0 like so many others state. That "both 1 and 0 at the same time!" BS is the most confusing idea ever to enter computer science.

[@david203]

It is only confusing because of the mysticism of the Copenhagen Interpretation, which physicists agreed to in 1927 and have slavishly adhered to ever since. A Qubit can only hold a 0 or a 1. It is a two-state device which only appears to be in an indeterminate state during a calculation. I hope that Dr. Hossenfelder corrects this sometime soon.

[@thewiirocks]

@@david203 The device is ultimately digital. But during computation, Quantum computers make no effort to force a digital state. Rather, they allow the waveform to carry an infinitely precise state between 1 and 0 (what we might classically refer to as “fuzzy logic”) while doing calculations. Calculations are accomplished via interference of waves. The determination of 1 and 0 is forced immediately before the value is read. A similar computer could probably be built using fluids and disruptions to the fluids. But such a computer would be big, slow, and really difficult to use. i.e. Impractical for real-world use. Which means that no particular interpretation of Quantum physics is required to make Quantum computers work. Only that we are able to create logic gates out of known Quantum effects.

[@david203]

@@thewiirocks Nonsense. Provide a reliable reference or admit that you made this up. From the Wikipedia article on quantum computing: "A qubit can be in a 1 or 0 quantum state, or in a superposition of the 1 and 0 states..." I've never seen anything about the use of fuzzy logic.

[@thewiirocks]

@@david203 Geez. This has to be the first time I’ve been accused of making up how a computer works. It’s really not that complicated. From Microsoft Research’s page (first result for “quantum computing superposition“): *Qubits and probability* Classical computers store and process information in bits, which can have a state of either 1 or 0, but never both. The equivalent in quantum computing is the qubit, which represents the state of a quantum particle. Because of superposition, *qubits can either be 1 or 0 or anything in between*. Depending on its configuration, a qubit has a certain probability of collapsing to 1 or 0. The qubit's probability of collapsing one way or the other is *determined by quantum interference*.

[@david203]

@@thewiirocks I did a Web search and found a large number of websites that claim that qubits can contain values between 0 and 1. Even though this search turned up many otherwise reliable websites, this is still incorrect. So this is not your fault, and Dr. Hossenfelder also somehow got this wrong. I apologize for accusing you of making it up! A qubit actually contains a quantum state, which is a linear combination (called a superposition) of two basis states, 0 and 1 (the coefficients are real numbers, in quantum computing, I believe; they are complex numbers in general). This is not the same as fuzzy logic, where a logic value is a real number between 0 and 1, inclusive. That's were many people seem to get it wrong. A basis state is any binary quantum value, such as spin, which behaves like a quantum state, meaning that it obeys the Schrödinger equation. It is not the usual 0 or 1 voltage level used in conventional computers. This means that a qubit is a superposition of these basis states, not a classical value of some sort, such as you would get by adding the voltage values for 0 and 1 and dividing by 2. A qubit is represented mathematically by a vector of the two base states. Quantum logic gates are represented mathematically by square arrays (matricies) of zeros and ones. When you apply a quantum logic gate to a quantum value, by matrix multiplying the two, you get another quantum value vector. It might be a pure 0, a pure 1, or a superposition of these two basis states. You cannot get a real number, because this is matrix multiplication, which mirrors how tiny systems behave (again, according to the Schrödinger equation). At the very end of a quantum calculation, the results, which are a set of qubits in some quantum state, are "measured", which means converted from the quantum domain (such as a set of up/down spin values) to the classical domain (which means zeros and ones). At no time do the components of a quantum computer hold values that are classically "in between" 0 and 1. All such values are superpositions of the 0 and 1 states only. References: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_superposition, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qubit medium.com/the-quantum-authority/intro-to-qubits-round-1-8ae4edcf33d1

[@manuelvillarreal8983]

Omg thank you for mentioning the worm holes!!! I have so many students that mention that to me, like too many people are watching PBS lol.

[@corley-ai]

This video is from 2 years ago and talked about the current limit being about 50 qbits. IBMs Osprey, has 433 qubits. So in 2 years they 8xed. That's better than Moore's law.

[@Kfimenenpah]

Nice video. Love how the quantum computer spit out 42 since it is the answer to all questions :D

[@unoriginalusernameno999]

This morning, I ate quantum french fries and drank quantum coffee and used my quantum phone to open a quantum KZbin video and my quantum fingers made me comment, and the quantum thing I have to say is that I have nothing to say ;)

[@carnsoaks1]

don't you mean organic?

[@LuisAldamiz]

Not entirely untrue but certainly mislading.

[@LuisAldamiz]

@@carnsoaks1 - Nah, it means that all is made of quantum "stuff" one way or another.

[@siquod]

The only thing about you that's perhaps not quantum is your consciousness...

[@johnkeck]

Sounds like you live in Star Trek! lol

[@n0van0va]

Your video popped in my YT recommendation. For my IT engineer probatory exam, i had to write a 40 pages report and do a speech (yesterday) about Quantum computing innovation.. My conclusion drawed skepticism and deception about the whole hype coverage.. your video is gread and sum up way better my pov in this subject. Glad to have subscribed to your channel.

[@RandomGamer-qy6ys]

Now this is who we want representing the science community, No bull, No shit forward thinking. Just straight to the point 💚

[@bighairyfeet]

She's Democrat so there's that

[@apilolomi]

@@bighairyfeet Your source for this information?

[@bighairyfeet]

@@apilolomi Dr. Fauci

[@elmondark]

I don't think it needs to be an issue with forward thinking, as it can draw interest to the field, producing more funding, and researchers. The sensationalist lies can go though.

[@elmondark]

@@bighairyfeet i just assume ppl are, until shown otherwise 😐

[@Loose-Shirt6551]

Thank you so much for doing these videos. I'm not a scientist but am interested in science. I really appreciate the effort you've put forth!

[@edwardanthony8929]

Arthur Clark proposed 5 laws of science. One was if a senior scientist says something is impossible, they are usually wrong. My corollary is but it will take much longer than you expect.

[@kadourimdou43]

I’m waiting until Dr Sam Beckett gets his machine working.

[@johnb.1020]

What is the word - folly from this - all this - folly from all this - given -

[@thwh77]

Every time a hype dies, Hitwoman Agent 47 Sabine sneaks out of the scene unseen.

[@Hyperlooper]

Agent 42

[@xuebao-john-williamgibson3888]

Sabine: I’m a retired Electrical (Electronic) Engineer who spent 40+ years of my life working with computer systems. Your explanation of quantum computing was spot on (except given our current level of technological prowess it is likely going to take 50 to 100 years for a truly useable quantum system to rise to the level of usability). Originally when I started my engineering education several professors in the physics department of the university I attended tried to convince me to switch my major to physics (mostly because quantum mechanics always seemed to be a rational explanation of reality plus I really love the math behind it). However, for practical reasons I decided to stick with engineering rather than science - besides at the time, engineers were paid and I had a family to take care of. I have subscribed to your channel and will over your past episodes and will look forward to all your ones.

[@howardweir3112]

She is a terrific communicator.

[@simonrigac8201]

1:56 - Quantum computer instantly answers the question of life, the universe, and everything. You rule, Sabine!

[@schumzy]

This cracked me up. But it still didn't give us the question.

[@shai2972]

Having now become more familiar with Sabine's videos, which I enjoy, and which tend to carry a sober, down-to-earth, and level-headed voice, I have a better understanding of why Sabine has taken such a pessimistic viewpoint on Quantum, for which I still maintain that she is wrong. Sabine comes across as a well educated physicist, but not an engineer by training. According to founder of prestigious Quantum Computing company, IonQ, Chris Monroe, the physics is no longer the issue, but rather the remaining challenges to be surmounted are all engineering challenges. Similarly, IBM CEO, Arvind Krishna. and Alphabet CFO, Ruth Porat, projected, at this year's Davos Economic Forum, that Quantum Computing would reach maturity sufficient for commercial advantage by 2025 - just a few short years. Sabine also neglected to differentiate between annealing and gate-based quantum computing models. D-Wave has already used its annealing version to solve real-world problems for clients that would otherwise not have been possible. That is not a hypothetical or future eventuality - it has already happened. There is no "quantum hype" at present, but I can assure you of one thing - there *will* be. And for very good reason.

[@garyfilmer382]

Thank you for shining more than a ‘quanta’ of light on this fascinating science, and enabling me to see more clearly through all the hype and misleading ‘headlines’ in the popular press/media.

[@johnkeck]

Thanks, Sabine! Looking forward to that black hole superfluid video too.

[@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace]

BH = BS

[@patrickfitzgerald2861]

The 21st century could be called the "Age of Hype," except that there won't be anyone left to call it that by the end of it.

[@bsadewitz]

Every age is the age of hype. ;-)

[@Danuxsy]

Don't get her wrong, Quantum will be revolutionary regardless of the obvious hype, which she agrees on.

[@milanstevic8424]

don't get hype wrong, it exists with a reason, and things are always hype-worthy because benefits. good hype.

[@HOTD108_]

@@bsadewitz Not really.

[@vimleshkumarkanaujiya]

I am a 25-year-old future scientist, If we could create VLSI, AI Models. Why not Quantum Computers?. When the AI term was coined, people were laughing at it, but now see the change.

[@centripetal6157]

AI is not actually intelligent. Current AI is only generating data that is being input. Its not creating anything new - it's literally just copy pasting data that it already has.

[@vimleshkumarkanaujiya]

​@@centripetal6157👍🏼

[@LouisHansell]

Sabine, you always do an excellent job detailing issues in physics.

[@vjbphysics949]

Sabine, you are a precious gift to this silly world.

[@stevenk-brooks6852]

Sounds like you are in love with Sabine too!

[@milanstevic8424]

Is it a silly world, when really it's just shady, full of chips, clips, dips, tips, lips... A simp in it, oh how wanton, fixated upon a lady who was fond of quantum. And the silly world got sillier, on the brink of the apocalypse.

[@chezgr8r308]

I've been studying quantum computing for a few months now and this is right on the money. It's exciting stuff, but it's been hyped up way too much. Great video!

[@paulbodi9376]

I just loved the 42 answer. 😂 Thank you for sharing with us! 🙏🏼

[@datapro007]

Hi, Sabine, referring to 6:16 - As you likely know, Don Lincoln is a physicist at Fermi labs. He has an excellent series on KZbin on particle physics and other topics. He has mentioned you in one of his videos in a complimentary way. I read his article, and he isn't trying to mislead anyone. I love your videos and am a fan of both you and Don. Let's keep it real.

[@lohphat]

Intent isn’t in question. The issue is the representation of information in accurate context. He misrepresented - intentionally or not - the scale of the threat to undo current crypto methodologies.

[@datapro007]

@@lohphat You're Sabine's spokesperson? Sabine says Don is "lying by omission", so yes, that implies intent.

[@yzScott]

I was looking specifically for what you had to say on quantum sensing. Largely, the coverage in this video states exactly the reasons I am interested in the topic. (without adding any detail) It would be very interesting to hear about the kinds of things might be done in principal, and when we might accomplish any of them. As a former military radar tech, I know enough to be blown away by the quantum receivers in the lab now. No doubt there is much more.

[@josephdestaubin7426]

Metrology is one of the most interesting things out there, quantum or otherwise. The history of Metrology is also really interesting.

[@IgorFitz]

Are you sure it is not meteorology? ;^)

[@josephdestaubin7426]

@@IgorFitz Quite sure.

[@ShadowManceri]

@@IgorFitz Metrology is about measuring. Meteorology is about atmosphere.

[@IgorFitz]

@@ShadowManceri Thanks, but I just joked :^)

[@tripillthreat]

I appreciate how Sabine frequently and credibly calls “bullshit” on a lot of irresponsible statements and wrongheaded notions.

[@frankdimeglio8216]

WHY HABITUAL AND SELFISH LIARS SUCH AS BRIAN GREENE, SABINE HOSSENFELDER, AND DAVID SPERGEL ARE PART OF A MUCH WIDER AND SINISTER NIGHTMARE THAT IS RAPIDLY UNFOLDING: We always begin with typical, common, and ordinary experience in establishing physical FUNDAMENTALS/truths. LIFE is about living. TEACH REAL PHYSICS. E=mc2 IS F=ma. The truth is the way. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Modern physics is BIG BUSINESS that is far more concerned with making money than it is with making sense and TRULY helping people IN GENERAL. THINK. They have their business equipment (telescopes, rockets, war making/destructive devices, nuclear power, nuclear pollution/waste, particle colliders, satellites, microscopes, etc.) and their other business practices (e.g., courses, books, tuition, "peer" "review") that they use to "corner the market" on what they then sell and present to you as legitimate and "ESSENTIAL" business products and "truths". They make ENORMOUS amounts of MONEY by changing experience from what is natural. In other words, to a very disturbing and significant extent, they are FABRICATING reality and the "truth" along with it. HOWEVER, TRUTH, reality, AND nature/natural experience go hand in hand. FACT. Indeed, if we walk away from reality, reality walks away from us. (STOP watching television.) In fact, the big picture is ESSENTIAL. It is called having common sense. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. INDEED, the big question is who is TRULY and actually "BENEFITTING" from all of this; and for what reasons? For example, are our tax dollars actually being utilized WISELY? Indeed, is being a BILLIONAIRE actually and truly representative or constitutive of philanthropy !!? NO, IT IS NOT. Climate change/environmental destruction IS VERY REAL, and it is absolutely catastrophic. Stop the rip-offs, the lies/liars, the delusional nonsense, the speculative fantasies, wasteful environmental destruction, the fear mongering, the escapist hysteria, the clowning around, and OUR BEING DELIBERATELY AND DECEITFULLY DUMBED DOWN REGARDING WHAT IS OUR PRECIOUS AND TRULY PRICELESS PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE. By Frank DiMeglio

[@wayneroche144]

...and I assume you can prove that Sabine is in fact correct? Because I believe Sabine is the source of said "bullshit".

[@frankdimeglio8216]

@@wayneroche144 THE ULTIMATE AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF OF THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA: Ultimately and truly, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. SO, time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Great !!! "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS F=MA. Consider the man who IS standing on what is the EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; as E=mc2 IS F=ma. GREAT !!! E=mc2 IS F=ma. The linked AND BALANCED opposite of what is THE SUN is A POINT in the night sky. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Therefore, the linked AND BALANCED opposite of what is THE EARTH is ALSO A POINT in the night sky. Great. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the Earth AND the Sun are linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Great !!!!!! Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. E=MC2 IS F=MA. The EARTH and the SUN thus constitute and comprise what are the MIDDLE AND THE FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE (IN BALANCE) in full and BALANCED compliance and conformity with the CLEAR and universal fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great !!!! It ALL CLEARLY does make perfect sense. (The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky.) INDEED, BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. Now, very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. Great. NOW, OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. Notice the black space of THE EYE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. THE DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. Now, carefully consider what is the semi-spherical, translucent, QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL, AND BLUE SKY. Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is CLEAR. THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE (AS WATER). GREAT. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, as E=mc2 IS F=ma; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/energy, as this unifies AND balances gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy; as this balances gravity AND inertia. (This clearly explains BOTH F=ma AND E=mc2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY !!!) ACCORDINGLY, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, the BALANCE of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Our EXPERIENCE is NECESSARILY that of what is the FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE, AS we are BALANCED between what are THE SUN AND c (A POINT); AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. SO, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal areas in equal times; AND this is THEN consistent WITH/as F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is perpetual motion; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mc2 IS F=ma. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY does make perfect sense. THINK about what is QUANTUM GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Indeed, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Therefore, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution !!! Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravitational force/ENERGY is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Magnificent !!! E=mc2 IS F=ma. Is a two dimensional surface or SPACE visible or invisible ? The answer is that it is BOTH. So, the electron AND photon are structureless. A PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) is a balanced MIDDLE DISTANCE form in relation to E=mc2 AS F=ma. A PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) is a balanced MIDDLE DISTANCE form in relation to the Sun AND c (A POINT). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=MA. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. E=MC2 IS F=MA. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. The BALANCE of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) It is a very great truth that THE SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. MOREOVER, the ability of THOUGHT to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. Beautiful. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. E=mc2 IS F=ma. By Frank DiMeglio

[@johnsmith1474]

@@frankdimeglio8216 - TLDR but people who sign a post with their name, when their NAME is the username already, are head cases.

[@frankdimeglio8216]

Absolute proof that Mr. Frank DiMeglio is the greatest scientist/physicist who has ever lived: Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This is proven by F=ma AND E=mc2. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual (IN BALANCE). So, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; as gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Therefore, invisible AND visible SPACE in FUNDAMENTAL equilibrium AND balance IS the MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of space consistent WITH/AS what is fundamentally balanced GRAVITATIONAL/ELECTROMAGNETIC force/energy; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or balanced with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/energy; as this balances AND unifies ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy AND gravity; as this balances gravity AND inertia. (This explains F=ma AND E=mc2, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity.) ACCORDINGLY, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! A PHOTON may be placed at the center of the Sun (as a point, of course), as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky.) "Mass"/energy involves balanced inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL force/energy, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. So, time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves that electromagnetism/energy is gravity. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Great. Touch AND feeling BLEND, as GRAVITY AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND balanced; as gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND balanced IN AND OUT of SPACE AND TIME, as gravity is electromagnetism/energy. E=mc2 IS F=ma. This is entirely proven by the mathematical unification of Maxwell's equations AND Einstein's equations (given the addition of a fourth spatial dimension). Indeed, this explains why Einstein's equations predict that SPACE is either expanding or contracting. Moreover, this is why Einstein's equations allow for (or predict) "black holes". Balance and completeness go hand in hand. Einstein's equations are NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL. Notice the term c4. GREAT !!! ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This is proven by F=ma AND E=mc2. I have provided top down, true, and overwhelming mathematical proof AS WELL that gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. So, It is now abundantly and quite clear that Einstein never nearly understood gravity AND physics/physical experience. (Obviously, E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma.) Sir Isaac Newton now ranks second. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. In fact, the ROTATION of the moon does MATCH it's REVOLUTION. ACCORDINGLY, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; as gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. SO, a given planet sweeps out equal areas in equal times; AND this is THEN consistent WITH F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is perpetual motion; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Therefore, GRAVITATIONAL force/energy is proportional to (or balanced with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; as gravity is electromagnetism/energy. So, "mass"/energy involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance consistent WITH what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL force/energy; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL makes perfect sense. E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. ("Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. E=mc2 IS F=ma.) It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Great. By Frank DiMeglio

[@chuychongas]

Thanks, Sabine!. I was on the quantum internets going faster than the speed of light and then I saw your video and realized I am not supposed to be doing that! That sweater looks cute on you by the way 🖤

[@MightyJabroni]

Thx for this perspective. I always had an inkling that there was a fair bit of hyperbole going on in the quantum computing articles in the media. Especially considering the hardware requirements (intense cooling, “noise” sensitivity of the qbits etc.) I always thought to my self: "How do you scale this?" I think, the true use of quantum computing is not it's overall "power" but it's specialization to model things that would be too hard to capture with classical computing. I fail to see however, why all our mundane applications (like office stuff, games etc.) should be expected to run on quantum computers anytime soon. Because that would be woefully over-engineered and seem like a re-invention of the wheel.

[@nihilisticboi3520]

True. Quantum computers are very helpful for specific problems (whose domain will keep increasing as new advancements occur). Quantum computers aren't devised to replace classical computers.

[@adilmohammed6897]

1:55 that is a reference to the meaning of life death and universe right, Sabine?

[@Postermaestro]

no i think she just chose the number 42 randomly :)

[@intrusivethoughts3601]

5 years later still don't understand what their use is

[@KarlBunker]

Quantum meteorology: The cat is in a superimposed state of rained on and not rained on until you open the door and let it in.

[@Alondro77]

Isn't that just the weather forecast in general? I mean.... given how inaccurate it usually is. XD

[@hyperduality2838]

Qubits are dual (0 or 1) (0 and 1) -- Union is dual to intersection. Binary implies duality, up is dual to down, left is dual to right, in is dual to out -- Space duality. Alive is dual to not alive -- Schrodinger's cat or being is dual to non-being -- Plato's cat. Entangled entropy or correlated information = syntropy. Certainty is dual to uncertainty -- the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle. Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Quantum is dual to classical -- physics is fundamentally dual. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics. "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

[@GabrielLeni]

The good use of the internet. Thank you so much for these videos Sabine.

[@rodas4yt137]

1:39 "and the words will in the best case give you a rough idea of what's really going on", this should be science's official anthem. People read newspapers and think they know enough,

[@andrewwells6323]

I just assume everything is BS until Sabine says otherwise.

[@deant3980]

She's wrong sometimes.

[@samsang9806]

Although it sounds non relatable, but plz clarify me this. Ma'am wants to have all the students attend in the class. Is it right sentence to use??

[@daffidavit]

@@deant3980 But when she is wrong, she sometimes amends her videos to make the correction.

[@eswing2153]

All hail the clarifier.

[@garyha2650]

There is no scientist who isn't wrong sometimes. How can you spot a real scientist? Skepticism about everything including their own skepticism.

[@neffetSnnamremmiZ]

Maybe "technics" is the true character of natural science, like Heidegger saw. Physics is going to be less and less something like "world explanation" and more and more just an "instrument"!

[@RashadSaleh92]

The error is not in the art

[@mrJety89]

It already is.

[@goartist]

always has been

[@notimportant2478]

not always has been but be becoming, i think physics will be re-merging with philosophy

[@neffetSnnamremmiZ]

Maybe the belief in that was something like a "productive illusion"?

[@masquedebe713]

I knew most of this stuff but it is refreshing to hear a well articulated, authoritative, explanation. The future is bright, we just have to survive and the expansion of humanity into space will happen in my lifetime, with the help of quantum computing, etc. This future-assuring sea change is hampered by hypeboli and distraction. Thank you for combating that.

[@checallo]

Fantastic Sabine, as usual, and a voice of truth for non-insiders like us and out of the hype and what is 'imposed'.

[@fattyz1]

Best physics videos on KZbin, you have an irresistible force which herr Einstein couldn’t explain either.

[@wilfredv1930]

Finally someaone speaks on how media distort the scientific news, Sabine should definitely make a video weekly about news distorted by media

[@allenrussell1947]

My homemade Quantum computer that I made in my basement from old cereal boxes and kitty litter came up with "42", just like yours did. Still can't give me the question though.

[@LuisAldamiz]

The question is: "substract the sum of the two first digits of my birth year from the integer of the last two digits of that same year, signed: D. Adams".

[@Tubluer]

So, tell it to design a better quantum computer.

[@rottefanger1]

@@Tubluer that is the point exatly. life and the universe is too unspesific of a question, but the answer is 42. ref. the hitchhikers guide to the galaxy.

[@allenrussell1947]

@@rottefanger1 we're going to go with "How many paths must a man take?" For the ultimate question 😄

[@fredschmitt456]

The question: It's "what do you get if you multiply six by nine"

[@skaruts]

_"Skynet isn't gonna happen."_ -- Albert Einstein

[@cosmikrelic4815]

"everyone on the internet exaggerates" - marlene dietrich

[@milanstevic8424]

"who needs skynet? boot stamping face forever" - orwell

[@Smo1k]

"Why do people always *think* they beat the algorithm?!" - Jules Verne

[@gyozakeynsianism]

"Always be closing." -David Ricardo

[@cea6770]

5:30 Slight correction, this is roughly (although not exactly) what Einstein 'intended' by spooky action at a distance (Einstein was pre/concurrent with information theory so there was no way he would have worded it this way). Regardless, Einstein was wrong in this regard, as has been experimentally verified for decades. Actually a big contribution of the 2022 Nobel prize was disproving Einstein's understanding of 'spooky action at a distance' as information transfer, when actually, no information is transferred despite 'spooky action'.

[@Bandit19990]

This made my head spin, I just don't know which way.

[@atarahashirazi1941]

Your comment is underappreciated

[@franz3810]

50/50 probability xD

[@hertzfall0]

The 42 joke was subtle and brilliant.

[@viejoprematuro]

Her age, isn't it?

[@LettersAndNumbers300]

The 42 ‘joke’ has been stale for decades. Stop thinking it’s funny. It isn’t.

[@hertzfall0]

@@LettersAndNumbers300 how about no

[@LettersAndNumbers300]

@@hertzfall0 Comedy has developed since using '42' as a punchline. It's not funny. It's just an in-joke for nerds. Haha we get it you don't. Haha.

[@hertzfall0]

@@LettersAndNumbers300 Ah, Jesus Christ I shouldn't have evoked any further opinions on this matter. Sincerely noted with I don't care and have a good one.

[@em.1633]

Don't think I didn't notice you said early in the video "enthusiasts for something will give you an overly optimistic outlook for it", then when it came time to talk about the domain of your own work it was flush praise! :P

[@promenade-uncouth]

I'm so glad I found a youtuber that actually gives reasonable and detailed analysis without trying to overhype and baffle the audience

[@Wang_Monkey]

"What do you expect from the Daily Mail" I wasn't expecting that! Ohh I'm crying xD

[@rayoflight62]

The most interesting simulation I've seen is the "artificial atom" that allowed to see what happens to an electron right before a quantum jump, and emitting a photon soon after it starts jiggling more intensely. Thanks for the video. I believe the quantum "applications" are to the physics what "futures" are to finance: a big money-spinning exercise...

[@michaelhusar3668]

I have no idea what she is talking about, I just watched because I like to hear her say Einstein.

[@tubehepa]

Se on ehta teutoninen tapa ääntää sana Einstein, siis: ain-schtain (one-stone, yks'kivi?)... ; )

[@hal9thou001]

Me too. 😄

[@jonp3890]

Ein🤫tein

[@slooob23]

Einshhtine

[@davidjericho4815]

The world would be a better place if the media spotlight was on Sabine instead of Neil.

[@johnsmith-zh1bt]

de grasse is a major example of a celebrity talking headscientist who is largely empty of content

[@w.maximilliandejohnsonbour725]

As a backyard theoretical researcher ( myself ). You make a very good compelling point.

[@Blockistium]

"QuAnTuM" is one of the most annoying crutches in science fiction, used to explain anything away with little to no understanding behind the buzzwords

[@sapitron]

so, are you saying that star trek discovery promotes toxic feminism ?

[@juliat4908]

Can you even explain the basics of Quantum mechanics?

[@alxmtncstudio2066]

Wait till people make Entropy hype...

[@quantumpolariton122]

Perpahs then a science book is a way forward, even a quick Google search will tell you what quantum means....or is that too hard-core?

[@Blockistium]

Are you guys seriously choosing to die on the hill of the quantum flux trope