Don't go (Yazoo) - short demo arrangement with DSI evolver

[@cthulufunk]

Spot on! Excellent.

[@laubimusic77]

a few hints: evolver sounds punchier (for bass, leads...) when you plug the stereo out into two mono inputs on your mixer and center both channels (to my ears better than the internal mono-function). Most of the sounds use slow PWM... just tried to reduce the evolver to the pro-one concept :)

[@gearjunkies]

this is VERY VERY VERY cool! well done!

[@kraftzug66]

l evolver è uno dei synth che si avvicina di più al synth originale di don t go (arp 2600) ..bravo Hans per la programmazione

[@SINFORMA]

perfec!

[@sipe12]

Good work, very good video

[@sloo7047]

this is amazing you should make a full version

[@laubimusic77]

good concept - like a mix between the old Roland Instrument/remote controller (PG-xxxx) and the Yamaha TX-816: up to 8 "no access" rack modules and one high quality desktop controller. so you have single independent voiceboards/outputs which are easy to service too. with USB you could easily arrange the voices: unisono + detune, splits (free voice allocation), layers, cyclic or random voice allocation...

[@civ1]

- great yazoo cover! - It would be nice to hear more electro pop/ synth pop demos of the evolver - everything else is just techno minimalism - but this is very very nice though.

[@laubimusic77]

thanks for the link - of course pro-one has VCOs + hardware envelopes instead of DCOs and software envs on the evolver - this makes evolver less raw & gritty but the (new) CEMs still give you good ole sequential sound ;) I totally agree with you concerning the concept for a new quality synth: VCO: discrete osc are best (my opinion) but expensive, VCF: my favorite one is still a lowpass - highpass combination, both with resonance, like the one on cs-80. ENV: hardware envelopes rock! :)

[@sean465]

Jam!

[@laubimusic77]

thanks for your nice comment - it is a demo and the main sounds of the song are featured, so enjoy! :)

[@blissx]

nice man

[@cthulufunk]

Great job. Really really close. Envelopes on orginal a bit snappier, but I'm impressed.

[@laubimusic77]

yes! ;-)

[@acidjack]

nice demo, realy ...

[@fleskebille]

It could be the same concept as Oberheim's x-voice, except expander modules will have no knobs or buttons. One "brain" module, and then tack on as many expander modules as you can afford or want. At least the digital part can be very powerful for little money now. I just listened to Studio Electronics CODE at novamusik. Amazing sound, but yes, it costs a lot! Maybe i'll settle for an ATC-X.

[@laubimusic77]

grazie! :) synth originale = SCI pro-one

[@UnchainTheNight1]

lol kool

[@fleskebille]

I see no reason to use hardware envelopes today if they are 32bit/96KHz and has the flexibility of what you find in say Octopus or FM8 and down to micro second control. Every CC is 32bit and everything is exposed to Open Sound Control :) Two multimodes (LP/HP/BP 12/24dB) would be ideal. I'm thinking SEM (+ extra OB-X saw) VCOs, and SEM and MOTM440 VCF. Google MOTM440 and listen to that beauty!

[@astroboomboy]

anybody now a place where one can download evolver presets?

[@laubimusic77]

.. and of course single outputs, quality hardware (wood, metal) etc. but the times for "best quality available" instruments are hard because of the high manufacturing costs. If retail price for a synth goes beyond 3.000 it's bad for today's business... thats the crux - you can't have high quality and low price at the same time. so, you always get what you pay for... but why a poly-monster? A no-compromise single voice would have best chances, and with multi-tracking you have true polyphony.. :)

[@fleskebille]

novamusik. com/sounds/samonikallcode. empetre