Dr Ali Ataie: Finding Muhammad PBUH in the Bible

Mirroring this Zaytuna College lecture by Dr Ataie to help get more people to see it. Original: • Finding Muhammad (peac... Zaytuna College faculty member, Dr. Ali Ataie lectures on "Finding Muhammad (peace be upon him) in the Bible: An Inquiry Into Surah 7: 157-258".
Given the polyvalent nature of religious texts and by analyzing early Christian Patristic as well as traditional Sunnite exegetical methods, this lecture will attempt to identify prophecies and typologies of the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, in the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) in light of the Qur'anic statement that the Prophet is "mentioned in the Torah and the Gospel" (Qur. 7:157).

[@xelakram]

This gentleman is so erudite and polished. It is such a pleasure to listen to him.

[@celestialknight2339]

CANNOT WAIT to listen to this. As soon as I see Dr. Ali Ataie I hit like 😁 may Allah (swt) bless the brother, Ameen

[@tranki885]

Abdul S. David wood schooled this guy

[@IrfanAhmad-uv4ul]

​@@tranki885what are u smoking bruh? Did u watched the debate?

[@IrfanAhmad-uv4ul]

​@@tranki885at the end of the debate Literally David wood admitted that •bible is currupted •bible contain bad and inhumane laws

[@IrfanAhmad-uv4ul]

​@@tranki885 watch it coward

[@kamranemin5356]

Dr Ali absolutely demolished that fraud and embarassed him in front of everyone ​@tranki885

[@MrAlio84]

In Ishiah 40:6 you can also find Muhammad PBUH. It says in hebrew (Qera) and he answered (Mah Eqra). Which means in Arabic translated to Englsih (Read) and he answeres (I can't read) If you read Isaiah 40:1-6 you can find it is talking about the Arabia (Arabah in hebrew) translated in English bible to (Wilderness).

[@lordrockman7431]

Although according to the quran Muhammad could read.

[@lordrockman7431]

Because it would prove that he's a real prophet, bearing in mind that the Biblical texts, including the New Testament are much older than the Quran, and Christians and Jews would have to accept Islam. Muhammad is not found in the Bible any more than Jesus is found in the Old testament.

[@MrAlio84]

Lord Rockman Isaiah 35, Isaiah 40, and Isaiah 42 are clear evedince of the coming of Islam and prophet Muhammad PBUH. If you can read Hebrew you will see clearly Isaiah prophesied about the rise of Islam and the coming of Muhammad PBUH.

[@lordrockman7431]

Isaiah 35: 5-6 5 Then will the eyes of the blind be opened and the ears of the deaf unstopped. 6 Then will the lame leap like a deer, and the mute tongue shout for joy. If anything it sounds like a prophecy about Jesus. Isaiah 40:2 40 Comfort, comfort my people, says your God. 2 Speak tenderly to Jerusalem, and proclaim to her that her hard service has been completed, that her sin has been paid for, that she has received from the LORD’s hand double for all her sins. When did Muhammad comfort the Hebrews or speak tenderly to Jerusalem? Isaiah 40: 3-5 3 A voice of one calling: “In the wilderness prepare the way for the LORD[a]; make straight in the desert a highway for our God.[b] 4 Every valley shall be raised up, every mountain and hill made low; the rough ground shall become level, the rugged places a plain. 5 And the glory of the LORD will be revealed, and all people will see it together. For the mouth of the LORD has spoken.” Jesus uses this passage about John the Baptist. Isaiah 42 The Servant of the LORD mentioned here is Israel. Look at verses 18 -22 “Hear, you deaf; look, you blind, and see! 19 Who is blind but my servant, and deaf like the messenger I send? Who is blind like the one in covenant with me, blind like the servant of the LORD? 20 You have seen many things, but you pay no attention; your ears are open, but you do not listen.” 21 It pleased the LORD for the sake of his righteousness to make his law great and glorious. 22 But this is a people plundered and looted, all of them trapped in pits or hidden away in prisons. I see no evidence here of Muhammad or Islam.

[@lordrockman7431]

Muhammad came from Petra, he has no connection to Arabia.

[@pacificmd1054]

Dr. Ataie = Class.

[@SheikhAlladeen]

,#,,filthy sex cult Allah allows se* with children kzbin.info/www/bejne/hZe8k4ipg7KfpMk

[@gussbaghdadi3661]

Amazing

[@SheikhAlladeen]

,#,,filthy sex cult Allah allows se* with children kzbin.info/www/bejne/hZe8k4ipg7KfpMk

[@farhan00]

Does anyone know who asked the question at 1:19? I am almost certain I randomly prayed next to that guy this past Ramadan in DC, and he's from the Midwest. Interestingly, the guy who recited the Qur'an in the beginning was my tajweed teacher :)

[@Ersilay]

@ExMslm. You ask 20 questions yet expect not to receive an essay? Well, if you aren't dishonest. But I'll play this game. 1: Yes 2: Ask Jibril? 3: He actually did. Read the bible 4: Because he was a learned man and knew about mystical events. 5: If anything is true, why do people have disputes? Interpretations. 6: Simply by sticking to history 7: No one is saying Muhammad(pbuh) is a biblical prophet. He's in line with biblical prophets. Also, you writing "mohammed" shows you were never a muslim to begin with, it's very obvious, but I'll continue. 8: I don't know, everything except claims of godhood? 9: Islam doesn't have 124'000 prophets. Prophets submitting themselves to God amount to that number. Why would we know anything about them if God hasn't said anything about it. Can we build a time machine? 10: They are not mentioned but they can be accepted on account of jewish testimonies. 11: Yes. But we don't believe anything they said is kept as they were uttered. 12: Yes, the jewish temple hosted feasts, statues and the likes. That didn't make it unholy. 13: He didn't for the first, he did the second, and we do the same because he did it. Not because of the blackstone in itself but because there is a reward in imitating the prophet(pbuh). 14: Lol, even if that was true, what is the point? Also, while you're correct in the quran not mentioning it for Ismai(pbuh), the rabinic texts do. And the quran says of Muhammad(pbuh) that he was a "hanif". It not only means a monotheist, but also a follower of the law of Ibrahim(pbuh). Hanif were circumcised, just like his father was. 15: Hanif I already said it. Female circumcision is mentioned as procedural but should be avoided nonetheless. 16: The word is contradiction. But yes, you can find many contradictions and mistakes in the quran if you go to certain websites, who are refuted by other websites you refuse to see. 17: Duh 18: You revealed yourself didn't you... "exmslm", more like christian pagan. Anyway, that's because when we're discussing with christians, it's easier to play around with your scripture to show you the inconsistencies than refuting you with a book you don't even believe in. 19: They did. Then it was forbidden. Just like Jesus(pbuh) did with divorce. It was allowed under the Torah, but it wasn't under Jesus(pbuh). Likewise, drinking alcohol was allowed then forbidden. You'll notice that my answers are shorter than your questions. I don't expect an answer, because you're obviously hypocritical in your name and behaviour so I'll mute you as it is. Ponder upon it instead of answering, it'll be useless anyway.

[@Christophe1961D]

I am christian and I so agree with you when you read the words of Jesus in John : "the Father and I are one" by speaking of "a unity of intention". Jesus said "I always do the will of the Father". The will of Jesus and the will of the Father are always one. Jesus is TOTALLY under the submission of the Holly Spirit. In other words, He is perfect. He is without sin. Now, if I am not only a muslim (submitted to God), but also a Christian, it is because the New Testament gives us a way of redemption : If we believe the promise of Jesus when He said that He will come and abide IN us, that He will send us the Holly Spirit (John 15, Col 1:27 ), and if we abide in Him (John 15:4), in other words if we walk by the Spirit (Christ is the anointed one in us, anointed by the Spirit) and not by the flesh, then He will accomplish the righteousness of the law in us (Rom 8:4, Mat 5:17). In other words, He will make us perfect as He is perfect (Eph 5:27). I see there the fullfilment of the promise done to our father Abraham. And what a promise 🥳! Isaac points to the Body of Christ (Gal 4:21-31). Then, children of Abraham, stop fighting against each other, and believe in the God of the Thorah, the Gospel and the Coran 🙂.

[@moustapha8822]

MaaShaa Allah

[@SheikhAlladeen]

,#,,filthy sex cult Allah allows se* with children kzbin.info/www/bejne/hZe8k4ipg7KfpMk

[@neilcastro836]

How foolish are those who dispelled this informative video in any way shape or form. By Allah this man has so much knowledge that is better than gold or silver.

[@DarioHaruni]

"Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world." [1 John 4:1] This indicates that the early Christians believed that true prophets and false prophets will come after the departure of Jesus. If it wasn't so, it would be saying something like "Believe no spirit after Jesus."

[@DarioHaruni]

In Albanian, which is very similar to Greek, especially to old Greek (they're sister languages almost), we use the word "Perri" for a girl who is lovely, beautiful and god-like. In our ancient pagan religion, perris were mythical people or creaturs. And it comes from a general meaning of a person who is in some form divine or connected to the divine. God renders Perëndi in Albanian, which is possibly from Perri + dios (god) or Per (divine) + en (fire) + dios (god). I think Periklitos or Perikli is more likely than Paracletes because in Greek there already are people with the name Perikli, for example Pericles the Younger, an Athenian general. But anyway, I think the best prophecy about our Prophet is the fact that Surah al Fatiha and the Lord's Prayer are so similar in structure. It's the best indication for the continuation of the same monotheistic and merciful message from Jesus to Muhammad.

[@kamranemin5356]

Its interesting the similarity between the english fairy, and the persian pari, and now i see yet another one, the albanian perri

[@DarioHaruni]

If you look carefully at what the Qur'an does, you notice that it's not trying to say "this story happened this way instead of the way you know it in the Bible". Many stories, most of them would be authentic in the Bible (especially those in the Old Testament), but the difference is that they're not all inspired scriptures. Many books or portions of books in the Bible are actually just documents of stories whose authors did not claim divine inspiration. And the collection of inspired text with non-inspired text has created many inconsistencies and false interpretations. The Qur'an uses those stories which are most important and retells them with the intention to set a parable or to make a theological correction. That's why we see the stories in different Surahs, in different contexts - because they have in them multiple layers of meaning. The Bible as it is seems as if has many stories which are spiritually dead, they seem to offer little or not value. The Qur'an basically revives those stories. The Qur'an is al-Furqan, which means The Criterion or Distinguisher. So it distinguishes the right from wrong and it serves as a correct lens through which we can read the Bible.

[@justpassingby9685]

Salaam everyone

[@juliusalymaganga3522]

Wa alaikumu salaam

[@jinkazama496]

When was this?

[@DarioHaruni]

It says "o daughters of Jerusalem", maybe as a reference to the religions of the Abrahamic tradition, which all consider Jerusalem sacred - meaning this is about someone who will be uniting all these religions under the banner of monotheism (Muhammad s.a.w.s).

[@IbnAlHimyari]

Ali Ataie is an amazing lecturer and scholar Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم) is defenitly in the previous scripture

[@Stardust475]

No he's not

[@kamranemin5356]

Did you watch the video? 🤣 could not be any clearer​@@Stardust475

[@mohammedrassouluallah573]

Pls don't forgett to say, every time ypu are praising ALLAH'S creation💚 Machaa Allah

[@mohammedrassouluallah573]

@ExMslm. 👍🏻👍🏾👍🏾👏👏👏Nice, very nice...Could we deal with one question at the time... Can you tell me little bit about you EX Muslim? Where are you from? Question1: How do we know for sure Jibril عليه السلام ....cause we believe everything the Prophet said. ...we have so many proofs Question 2 You can compare Mohammed (s) to any others prophet....You have no idea about Mohammes(s) abd the way the prophet recieve thw Quran????

[@mohammedrassouluallah573]

@ExMslm. Question 4-8 Waraqa ibn Nawfal was a christian and he was the first accepted Mohammed(s)...... Isaiaha 42 :10-12

[@mohammedrassouluallah573]

@ExMslm. Why one Quran and many 72 sect? Islam is perfect, human not... How do i know i am on the right way? Islam is simple: 5 Pillars and try to imitate the prophet.... The proohet said it .. about 124.000 Prophet.... Allah said we wiil never punish ..until we sent a messenger..

[@soban1981]

Is Jesus found in old testament by name?

[@alidwana]

No

[@reneandjohn]

soban1981 Jesus never claimed that his name was stated in the OT. So this question does not make any sense. But soera 61:6 is another point, because Jesus never told about Achmed.

[@soban1981]

My brother I don't want a debate, I just wanted to know if his name is in old t. But Emanuel is mentioned in old t and isiah was talking about Jesus right?

[@melanie_lyrism]

Jesus said many times that the prophets spoke about Him if you read the Beriyth Hadasha you will find about Jesus refering to the Tanakh.

[@melanie_lyrism]

soban1981 Yes look at Isaiah 9:5 for example.

[@imranlodhi90]

It would be nice if somebody who have lectures about Prophet Muhammad (Sallahu A3leyhi Wa Salam) would bring forth tafaseers not only from muslim sources but also from jewish and/or christian scholars. Thanks

[@mounirdirini6027]

Dr. Ali, why has there been no reference to the obvious leads presenting altercations in the Bible. Why are you approaching it by juxtaposing the Quran on the Bible. The Quran is clear in focus of where and how this tampering come to evidence

[@jackjill3205]

Yahya Snow exorcising comments now um UMM!... strengthen our resolve. Thanks

[@alfonso201]

Jack Jill what?

[@mewying5184]

1:38:16

[@leebarry5686]

Bible is not equal to the Tawrah or the Gospel, or both, because it includes much more documents which are not revelation. Revelation only comes to a prophet or a messenger who received it from God, so writings by others should not be claimed as from God . Therefore, the corruption of odle revelation comes from both alterations of the original text of a revelation and the claims that some people' writings are inspired by the holy spirit and hence are also revelation! This is very important! This is the starting point and principle for Muslim scholars to embark on any discourse on Bible!

[@carefullychristian8657]

No where is Mohamed in tanakh or Gospels Keep it simple 1.Gods covenant was through Abraham,isaac,jacob Mohamed is not of that line The cases 1.dr.dedaat first to popularise deutr 18 v 18 as mohamed it has been refuted thoroughly Ataie distances himself 2.Ataie claims isaiah 42 First quran says you find in torah and gospel Isaiah is not in any of those but this supposed great scholar misses that? The text uses servant,chosen put my spirit upon him Many are the first two But it is jesus where even quran says he was supported by the spirit not mohamed Kedar is mentioned tbat the cities rejoice not a prophet is from there Now we know mohamed is not of Abraham,or ishmael who begats kedar. Its not even in Quran,ie kedar The text clearly has nothing to do with mohamed So is song of solomon Listen to israelis and other scholars Never do israelis take mecca holy city and kaaba Then mohamed wad rejected by most israelis and he butchered them and wiped them frpm Arabia The expectd messish is not frpm Arabia but their oen

[@ronaldnwokike5242]

Honestly I listened to the whole lecture and come away with mental gymnastics to fit Muhammed into the Old Testament.

[@jaketwigg1065]

Isaiah 42, end of story

[@condorianonegdiffsgoku]

How about daniel 7? In daniel 7, it mentions that the fourth beast (rome since it came after babylon, medopersia and macedonain greece) had ten horns when the little one came. Three horns earlier to the little one fell before it. Either it means there would have been 13 but because of 3 falling before the little one, there were 10 when the little one came. Or it means there were 10 including the fallen. In any case, the candidates are domitian (11th roman emperor) and hadrian (14th). Another indication for hadrian as opposed to domitian is he seems to be an antitype of little horn of the 3rd empire (antichous iv) as both went against the Most High by putting abomination in His holy ground.

[@condorianonegdiffsgoku]

It also says from the little one, the holy people would be at his hand (rome's control) for time, times and half time until the dominion goes to the hand of saints of the Most High. In daniel 12, we see the same phrase time, times and half time (whether it is a related prophecy or different I don't know but I am only concerned about the meaning of this unit of time in danielic angelic language) used for either 1290 days (i.e. years in danielic biblical language) or 1335. But the apparent meaning is 1335 since daniel wanted to know the end and angel told blessed are those who wait for that long with 1290 being a milestone of some sort.

[@condorianonegdiffsgoku]

Now if we add 1335 years 9 months 18 days to the day hadrian assumed power, we get the day when mehmet ii conquered constantinople (the capital of eastern rome) and once and for all ended the remaining roman empire and the power over the land came to muslims.

[@condorianonegdiffsgoku]

Is it a coincedence? It can't be self fulfilling since conquering an empire that stood for thousand years in the exact year is no easy feat. If daniel said, there would come a man after 1335 years who would die for sins, and it turns out someone did throw himself into death claiming to die for sins 1335 years later, that could be self fulfilling because anyone can make this unverifiable metaphysical claim.

[@jesusdeity2010]

For sure he is the bible. "Anyone with another Gospel then Christ cruisified is not in the truth". Always remember: Muhammed came after Jesus. Unfortunately never understood God's resolve for mankind's fall, made up another story, called it the only truth, cutting of the real truth, leading you away from your godly identity in Christ. What lots of people (even pastors) don't (yet) understand. God created us according to His own image and likeness. Godly. Mankind/the first Adam fell. The image of God in man got lost. That's why there is all this predicament on earth (selfishness, greed, lust, wars, sicknesses, death, etc). We are all born into that mess. For the fall of man a perfect atoning sacrifice had to be made.... that is what God did in Christ. With His own once and for all perefect sacrifice, He paid the debt for the fall of man for us, so we can be indwelled by His Spirit again and finally receive the divine life of the ages back, the first Adam let got of in the fall of man. An amazing act of grace and love by our creator. That is what you see happening in Christ's first disciples. They too healed all and walked in unselfish love. And yes.... that is still avaible today. The holy blood is in place, the Holy Spirit is here to give us understanding, power and transform us back to origin. Not to be debated about, but to be embraced and be-come. So: The Kingdom of God already came. Through Christ, in Spiritform, in those that understand. Hence the divine healing miracles we experience. God manifested in Christ to give us back the divine life mankind lost in the fall of Adam. Christ, the exact image of the invisible God. The image we were created after in Gen 1. The image we lost in the fall of man. The image that can be freely restored by Christ's blood and Holy Spirit working IN us. What a plan. What a solution. What a love. What a God. Jesus is amazing. It is the ultimate conclusion of the word and plan of God. God came full circle. He Himself stooped down from glory to restore us back to original created value: Christlikeness. Walking in divine healing power and unselfish love. Jesus, born of the Spirit of God, filled with the spirit of God. The "Son" of God, the incarnated word, God in the flesh. For three years He healed all, raised the dead, casted out demons, controlled nature, spoke pure divine truth. He said: "Follow Me. If you see Me, you see the Father. The Father and I are one. The glory I have IN My Father, I give to you. It pleases the Father to give you His Kingdom/Holy Spirit/divine nature. I will send Holy Spirit, the same as Me, He will be IN you, guide you into truth and give you explosive power. The same miracles i do, you will do too, because you will understand that the Father is IN Me and I am IN you. Freely I give you My Kingdom/Holy Spirit/divine nature, heal the sick, raise the dead, cast out demons, freely I give, freely share" Etc, etc, etc. I have experienced thousands of beautifull healing miracles through the power of Holy Spirit IN me already. Broken bones, cancers, covid, all kinds of infirmities healed in seconds. Demons manifesting and casted out by a simple "get out, in Jesus name". Jesus. De name above all names. In Him all power and wisdom is sourced and.... He calls us one with Him. God in man and man in God again. C'mon Jesus!! So.... again: God stooped down IN Christ to restore us back to Gen 1:27 were He said: "Let us make man according to our image and likeness and let them have authority.....": walk as Christ. Christ, the exact image of the invisible God. The image we were created after and being restored to by His atoning blood for the fall of man and indwelling Holy Spirit. You are free to receive this original divine life of the ages by Holy Spirit of Christ/God. Ask Him to guide you into truth. Read the Gospel of John and fall in love with your creator. You are not made for the fall of man and its effects, but for the image/glory of God and to walk like Christ. Holy Spirit is the guide and transforming power that will get you there. Amazing grace. A big leap in faith can be made when we start realizing we are already IN Christ, IN the last Adam. Free from the fall! Loved! Growing into awareness of our new (yet old) godly identity. Changing by Holy Spirit. The most fullfilled life ever. Paul healed all on Malta. He understood and wrote: "As in the first Adam ALL died (lost the divine nature), so also ALL were made alive IN Christ to walk in Zoë (= divine life) again". "IN Christ (the last Adam) we are co-cruisified (dead to the fall and its effects), co-raised (justified/made righteousness, holy, blameless, above reproach), co-seated (one with Him)" "The fullness of deity dwells in Christ and YOU HAVE BEEN MADE COMPLETE IN HIM, who is the head of every principality and power". So.... thank you Jesus! Thank you for redeeming me from the fall of man. Thank you for your Holy Spirit that makes this new (yet old) divine life come alive in me. You are amazing! In the shadow of Peter the sick healed... He understood too and wrote: "By Gods power (Holy Spirit) and knowing Christ, we have become partakers of the divine nature and have escaped the fall of man". The divine life of the ages has been returned to us by Jesus once and for all perfect atoning sacrifice for the debt of the fall of man and His indwelling Holy Spirit in us. Jesus/God is amazing!!! Ask Him to give you revelation and change you to the way it was before the fall of man: Christlikeness. He will do so. For it is written: "the Spirit brings forth after His own kind". "I have come to give you Zoë (divine life) in abundance...."

[@condorianonegdiffsgoku]

How do you explain daniel 7 prophecying Islam?

[@condorianonegdiffsgoku]

Let's count together (based on actual literal words): 1. Lion: Babylon paralleling head of gold in daniel 2 (also check lion of babylon). 2. Bear: Medo persia for it devoured babylon. Historically was archaemenid empire. 3. Leopard: Macedonia which spread fast like a leopard led by alexander. The four heads are four kingdoms it divided into after alexander.

[@condorianonegdiffsgoku]

4. The terrifying beast: Rome as it devoured macedonia. There were 10 horns as daniel was comtempleting about it when the little horn emerged. 3 of the first ones (no mention of 10) fell "before" it emerged. The same word "before" is used in both verse 8 and 20. Historically rome didn't have 10 emperors from when it was born so daniel was only mentioning the number of horns it had when the little horn came. Depending on how you count (daniel could have referred to the 10 still standing during the little one emerging out of 13 or maybe there were always 10), we can narrow it to domitian and hadrian. However antichous iv was called "little horn" of the 3rd in daniel 8. So if he is the type of rome's little horn, then hadrian makes sense as he put abomination (pagan temple) in the holy ground and antichous iv put abomination by sacrificing on the altar a pig to zeus. This is the biggest method of "speaking against the Most High". As for humbling three kings, the literal word is not "subdue". And domitian also didn't "subdue" anyway.

[@condorianonegdiffsgoku]

5. Saints of Most High who obey the son of man: We learn until they take away the dominion of the kingdom of this horn, there will be "time, times and half a time".

[@condorianonegdiffsgoku]

In the language of angels in daniel, we know this pharse means either 1290 days but more probably 1335 days converted to year (a biblical based principle constantly applied in daniel) as it is indicates by daniel 12.

[@tranki885]

You Muslims should watch Dr Micheal Brown Vs Nadir Ahmed . Poor Muslim couldn’t respond to anything DR Brown threw at him . Watch the video

[@IbnAlHimyari]

Nadir Ahmed is not a good debater. I can say the same thing. Look the debate between zakir Husain and Richard Lucas, he was not able to refute Deuteronomy 18:18. Matter of fact Michael Brown and zakir Husain will have a debate soon ان شاء الله

[@sunwukong32]

Love br Zakir ✊🏾

[@SheikhAlladeen]

@@IbnAlHimyari ,#,,filthy sex cult Allah allows se* with children kzbin.info/www/bejne/hZe8k4ipg7KfpMk

[@SheikhAlladeen]

@@sunwukong32 ,#,,filthy sex cult Allah allows se* with children kzbin.info/www/bejne/hZe8k4ipg7KfpMk

[@tranki885]

@@IbnAlHimyariyou should watch zakir hussain vs Dr. Brown 😂. Dr brown destroyed him 😂

[@robertpundsack1363]

This man has no understanding of the Christian God. There is no mention of a Muslim prophet found in our Bible. We,,, worship two different gods.

[@farhat5325]

Who is the prophet the Jews were waiting for and interrogated John the baptist about in John 1:22 ?

[@robertpundsack1363]

@@farhat5325 John is telling them of the coming of Jesus , read all John 1 . when get to vers 29-34 he mentions Jesus (34 : And I saw , and bare record that this is the SON OF GOD); as a Christian we are to read before ,after to get full picture. To many Muslims take one verse to make a sermon . Jesus is our savior.

[@farhat5325]

@@robertpundsack1363 you didn't answer the question and instead just made an accusation, if the context tells us who the prophet was then you should have no issue showing it, here is the question again as stated by Dr attie once more, and please give me a direct answer so I can stop asking, deal ? The Jews were asking John the baptist who he was, he told them he was not the Messiah, they asked if he was Elijah, he said NO, they asked if he was THE PROPHET, and he said NO, now if they knew the Messiah is the same person as THE PROPHET, they wouldn't have asked, so it looks like they were waiting for 3 personalities, the Messiah, Elijah and THE PROPHET, can you tell us who that was ?

[@robertpundsack1363]

@@farhat5325 are you so blind . I said clearly John said Jesus. What afraid to read past one verse . Clear your mind now read. This is John talking to the crowd. Go to John 1: 29 John sees Jesus coming to the river. 32 : -34. Go to 35-37. Due to how you're taught the Quran. No wonder you can see nor hear. It mentions Jesus name ten times in chapter . Go ahead count John 1: 1-51. Soooo yes I answered your in denial.

[@farhat5325]

@@robertpundsack1363 once again you keep making accusations with nothing to show for ... the 29th verse starts the next day completely separate from when those Jews were questioning John, now if John spoke about jesus after that it doesn't answer the question the Jews asked, are you THE PROPHET , a different person from the Messiah as per the questioning, and if your brain can't comprehend the logic here then it's you who has a problem not me.

[@mohamedissa1729]

Alhi yahya this whole notion of the prophet saws being in the bible is not true!!!!! We don't believe the bible to be the original word of Allah sent to the prophets... so using it is absurd and silly not to mention ur validating their scripture. When the prophet spoke about the jews and christains changing their scripture one of the things were the descriptions of the prophet saws.

[@kamranemin5356]

How do you explain the explicit statement of Allah then? The texts have been changed but there are stuff left in there that are true

[@tranki885]

David wood schooled this guy

[@pacificmd1054]

I think deep inside u know you're lying to yourself.... but whatever helps u go to sleep and believe that a mangod died for u.

[@SheikhAlladeen]

,#,,filthy sex cult Allah allows se* with children kzbin.info/www/bejne/hZe8k4ipg7KfpMk

[@RafikKhan-ol4zk]

when liar

[@tranki885]

@@RafikKhan-ol4zk look it up .

[@IrfanAhmad-uv4ul]

@@RafikKhan-ol4zk he didn't watch the debate At the end of the debate David admitted •bible is currupted •bible contain inhumane laws

[@martinpolis3076]

LooK doctor Ali there is Mohamed in bible as a false prophets lol

[@grayjudge9260]

christian prince will mop the floor with this guy.......

[@rizwanramzan5729]

Are you kidding... C.P cant even speak in grammatical sentences. Smh..

[@grayjudge9260]

@@rizwanramzan5729 try as much as you want....no pedo is chosen by the christian GOD.....

[@faithfulsoldier519]

Christian princess is hidden behind his laptop to not get humiliated by Muslims like his other Christian brothers who dared to show their faces to us.

[@IbnAlHimyari]

Yeah the same guy who insults and is caught lying many times. Did you know that many people who used to follow him admitted that he lied to much and even exposed him and stop watching and following his videos

[@mukhtarbaba1438]

And we will exposed this Christians always

[@reneandjohn]

The Bible is very clear about the Paracletos (translated as Helper). John 14:26 "But the Helper, *the Holy Spirit* , which the Father will send in my name, that one will teach you all things and bring back to your minds all the things I told you". It is clear that the Paracletos is the Holy Spirit, so no human, no prophet and sure no prophet Muhammad.

[@reneandjohn]

err Euh eh where does it say it is not the Holy Spirit? Moreover where does it say it is Muhammad?

[@reneandjohn]

err To be consistent, if it is Muhammed why it is not stated Muhammed? But in this verse it says Spirit of Thruth because of its purpose: to guide the disciples in all thruth (which comes from Jesus) during their mission, telling what has to come and glorifing Jesus because from Jesus via the Holy Spirit it will be disclosed to his disciples. So no other human messenger. Jesus never wanted to reveal more laws and revelations, on the contrary, he has justr fulfilled the law and the old covenant, as He told by Himself. He has established a new new covenant as the prophet Jeremiah predicted. That was through His blood which He predicted during the last supper and fulfilled on the cross and His resurrection. B.t.w. the moment before the Holy Spirit was poured out, as predicted by the prophet Joel, the Holy Spirit was not present any more because Jesus was ascended to heaven.

[@reneandjohn]

err Jesus never claimed a new law but he brought a new covenant. Math. 27: 26 “ for this is My blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for forgiveness of sins. “ And the Paraclete has to come for helping to spread the gospel all over the world. John 14:26 But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I said to you. “ Clearly the Paraclete, which is the Holy Spirit, has to remember the disciples what Jesus has teached them. How? That is explained in John 16:12-14 “I have many more things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. 13“But when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you into all the truth; for He will not speak on His own initiative, but whatever He hears, He will speak; and He will disclose to you what is to come. 14“He will glorify Me, for He will take of Mine and will disclose itto you. 15“All things that the Father has are Mine; therefore I said that He takes of Mine and will disclose it to you. Concerning your note about doing greater works, please don’t put the tekst out of its context. The tekst John 14 12-14 says "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who believes in Me, the works that I do, he will do also; and greater works than these he will do; because I go to the Father. 13“Whatever you ask in My name, that will I do, so that the Father may be glorified in the Son. 14“If you ask Me anything in My name, I will do it.” It is clear it is still Jesus doing these great things. My reply about Muhammad was concerning the Paraclete, if this was Muhammad then these verses should clearly state this. But in John 14:26 clearly says it is the Holy Spirit. Furthermore, Jesus has never claimed that his name was mentioned in the OT, so it has no sense to discuss about it. Furthermore, in John 15:26 and John 16:7 it is Jesus who sends the Paraclete. So if the Paraclete is prophet Muhammad, then Jesus is God. Because only God sends prophets. The choice is up to you.

[@reneandjohn]

err Depending on the purpose it could be also the Father, but clearly it is Jesus who is talking in John 14:14 and He does not say that the Father will do it. Furthermore Jesus is talking about after his ascension. That is another situation than His mission on this earth. During His earthly ministry Jesus moved in the power of the Holy Spirit and did His miracles by the Holy Spirit and not by His own divine power. This is because He was made for a little while lower than the angels (Heb. 2:9) and had emptied Himself and taken on the form of a man (Phil. 2:7). This would explain why in Matt. 12:22-32, when the Pharisees accused Jesus of casting out demons by the power of the devil, Jesus said that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit would never be forgiven? Why? Because Jesus, as a man who was ministering completely as a man under the Law (Gal. 4:4-5), did His miracles by the power of the Holy Spirit. This demonstrates that Christ was completely human and dependent upon God and that He was cooperating with the limitations of being human. That is why He said He didn't know the day or hour of His return. However, we see that after the resurrection of Christ that it is said of Him that He knows all things (John 21:17) and that He is omnipresent (Matt. 28:20). Therefore, after His resurrection and glorification, the Lord Jesus did know all things. "And Jesus came up and spoke to them, saying, "All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth." Matt. 28:18 I don’t claim that Muhammad’s name should be stated in the Bible. I only say that if it is neccesarry that the Paraclete has to be called Holy Spirit (what the Bible does in John 14:26) then you should be consistant and say that the Bible must state that the Paraclete is Muhammad if it is really Muhammad (but the Bible does not do so). But Quran 61:6 says “And [mention] when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, "O children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Ahmad." But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, "This is obvious magic." We never found evidence in the Bible that Jesus was talking about the comming of a person called Achmed. And 3rd, because of the blood of Christ, no bloody sacrifice is needed anymore. That was for once and for all. Many stories in the Quran about Jesus we already found in apocryphal books that are from much later date than the Canopic Gospels. As many other stories in the Quran that we find in other writings outside the Bible. So is the story of the rebellious Iblis already found the Talmud.

[@reneandjohn]

err Wel it seems you know a lot of the canonisation of the NT. Then tell me the name of the pagan king who pushed people to canonize the four gospels. You know the name of that king? Tell me in which book I can find Jesus making clay birds, which he proceeds to bring to life? In which book Mary gave birth to Jesus under a palmtree? Which book says that young Mary was put under the charge of Zechariah, an old man? In which book Jesus talks from his cradle? So tell me. Based on your remarks it is clear that you don’t understand the principle of the ‘trinity’, however this word is not mentioned in the Bible. We believe also in one God who reveals Himself in severall personalities. And youre right you don't need extra books to explain 'trinity'. Par example read the Old Testament in how many ways God reveals himself. So your remarks about monotheïsme have no sence in this case. B.t.w. Paul has nothing to with 'trinity' or wathever. Remove all epistels from Paul and nothing will change. But back to the topic of this video (because to avoid difficult questions Muslims allways change the topic) it is about Muhammed foretold in the Bible. Muslims always claim that the Paraclete is prophet Muhammed. How is that possible that Jesus is the one who sends this prophet, meanwhile it is only God who sends prophets? The Quran says that Isha (Muslims claims Jesus) talks about a person who’s name is Achmed 61:6. Where in the Bible is Jesus talking about Achmed?

[@mariafilipina1010]

Oh my Lord. Why do you have to put this crap on when everybody knows that Muhammad does not appear in the Bible. Why do you want to embarrass other Muslims

[@mattrincon3454]

Crysus Bu everyone knows it's true. Why do you have to be an idiot. What I said is fact.

[@MrAlio84]

Maria Filipina In Ishiah 40:6 you can also find Muhammad PBUH. It says in hebrew (Qera) and he answered (Mah Eqra). Which means in Arabic translated to Englsih (Read) and he answeres (I can't read) If you read Isaiah 40:1-6 you can find it is talking about the Arabia (Arabah in hebrew) translated in English bible to (Wilderness).

[@mariafilipina1010]

Muslim Scholars have refuted this crap. Learn something

[@seiddzekovic4189]

Maria Filipina Try to avoid RIDICULOUS red herrings and instead of making such claims try to reffute him on any single point he made in this lectrue,but that's obviously tough for you...Btw people who speak Arabic and Hebrew with English are really rare in today's world...

[@celestialknight2339]

Maria Filipina Ali Ataie IS a scholar, and no Muslim scholar has “refuted” the foretelling of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) in the Bible, because it is in the Quran. You cannot even name me one “Muslim scholar” (David Wood doesn’t count by the way) so stop making claims you can’t substantiate. You’re merely regurgitating false claims that you’ve heard, or fabricating things. You’re only embarrassing yourself. And the Jews say the exact same thing to you about The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary (peace be upon him), even calling him demon-possessed and a madman in the New Testament- so you have the same behavior as them. History indeed repeats itself, as the Prophets have always been mocked & rejected. And the name “Jesus” is prophecied ZERO times in the entire Hebrew Bible, yet you firmly believe he is foretold therein. And Muslim have no problem with that at all, but use *CONSISTENT STANDARDS* if you’re going to make claims against the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), and actually use evidence (by first refuting Ali Ataie) instead of merely imitating the Jewish enemies of Christ (pbuh) as well as calling this lecture “crap” which shows your narrow mindedness and lack of desire to learn. Also read Genesis 17:21- a direct divine promise to Abraham (peace be upon him) that Ishmael (peace be upon him) will be blessed and will be made into a *”great and fruitful nation.”* For a nation to be made “great & fruitful” they MUST worship the one true God and follow His commandments, which can ONLY be done with revelation, which can ONLY be delivered through & Prophet and Messenger. And thus the Prophet sent to the children of Ishmael (the Arabs) is none other than the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), who transformed the idol-worshipping pagan Arabs into pure monotheists. In fact, even the Jewish Rabbis of the renowned Chumash commentary state that this Genesis prophecy was fulfilled with the rise of Islam. So reject this and you have rejected the Bible. Affirm this and you have affirmed the Bible. Plain & simple. Don’t veil your own eyes, but accept the truth if you see it, and be willing to learn and take knowledge from where you can, rather than walking on a narrow rope of close-minded beliefs and a non-sophisticated response to real evidence & scholarship by merely saying “this is crap.” Come on, you can do better than that. May God Almighty guide you to truth by accepting His final Messenger, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), and His final revelation to mankind, the Majestic Quran.

[@reneandjohn]

The author of the Quran has forgotten to note where we find Muhammad in the Thora an the Gospel.

[@IbnAlHimyari]

Well it’s better than misquoting scriptures like the writers of the New Testament. Matthew in particular. It’s up to smart and sincere people with knowledge of scriptures to find him. The reasons there were Jews in Arabia is because they were expecting a new prophet to come

[@reneandjohn]

@@IbnAlHimyari Lol, why should the finding of the 'unletterd prophet' in the previous Scriptures only for smart and sincere people? What a nonsense. The author of the Quran had no knowledge of the previous Scriptures at all. The author was confused and could not make distinction between what was really mentioned in the Bible and later fantasized stories. That is why we find so many later made up fantasy stories about Jesus in the Quran. And I can ensure you that the real wise and sincere people has never found Muhammad in these Scriptures. The Islamic apologists are deceiving only the ignorant and gullible people.

[@mohammadmahmood9147]

​ The Prophet Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, is present in your books Read the Covenant of Moses and the Book of Revelation of Abraham, which are not canonical to you, telling of the time in which the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, will be sent. Read the vision of Daniel, which tells of the nation that will destroy the Roman state It talks about Constantine the Great, the little horn, who will speak great things about God, and then the Son of Man will come after 3 and a half times. Ezekiel says to the children of Israel, Turn, turn, turn, Take off the turban, Take off the crown, and that will not happen until the One to whom the kingdom comes. Isaiah 42 admits no doubt to anyone who is honest and wants the truth Christ is innocent of the beliefs of his divinity and was crucified to redeem people 

[@reneandjohn]

@mohammadmahmood9147 You did not show the Book of the Covenant of Moses, let alone the text that mentions 'muhammad'. Neither did you show the Book of Revelation of Abraham, let alone the text that mentions 'muhammad'. So there is good reason that you're talking nonsense.

[@mohammadmahmood9147]

​You are evading the truth In Daniel's vision, you made yourselves defeat the Roman state spiritually 🤔

[@MillatulHunafa]

He's definitely one of the most ignorant of what sunnah and Sunni entails... Ghazali, razi etc were mutakalimun (from ilm ul kalam) asha'riyyah not sunnis, they were esoterics not followers of textual evidence, hadeeth and narrations... They opposed the salaf , Malik , Shafi'i, Ahmad and before them thawri, ibn ul Mubarak and the tabii'n and sahabah radhiya allahu'anhum He claims Sunni ulama took philology like zamakhshari the mu'tazili whom by ijma' were kuffar like all other mu'atilah ... The salaf and ahlu sunnah used Arabic as a point of reference in the light of shariah not the other way around, and withheld that the ulama of Arabic were those grounded therein upon sound and Orthodox understanding...or that they, if otherwise, narrated from those of that sort before them. These modernists claiming sunnah are just like those who deviated and distorted the Orthodox way of Torah and injeel of old... Birds of a feather flock together....

[@sheikhalimonowicz8634]

MillatulHunafa Sorry to disappoint You but in the recent Grozny Conference Sunni Asha'riyyah/Maturidiyyah/Deobandiyyah/Barelviyyah have expelled you out of the banner of " Sunnism " and gave you a separate title called " Ahlul Hadith" . Asha'ariyyah aren't esoterics either btw , actually with my experience with Sunni variants , I've found out that they are more into Malik , Shafi , Abu Hanifa while you are into Ibn Hanbal . in my opinion both of you are Sunnis anyway however they reject this opinion . I'm neither Sunni , Asha'ari nor Ahluhadith btw . I'm Batiniyyah Sufi .

[@MillatulHunafa]

Sheikh Ali Monowicz I don't care about what some Putinic stooge in chechnya fixed up. The Deen of was revealed to rasulIllah sallaAllahu alaihi wa salam and perfected in Arabia, in Arabic ... without any esoteric, Greek philosophy nor any other outside unknown knowledge to extrapolate and deduce understandings foreign to rasulUllah sallaAllahu alaihi wa salam and sahabah radhiya allahu anhum, rather they and tabii'n and those after them clarified again and again, that anything foreign and unknown to the first generations aren't guidance nor allowed within the religious framework, rather it's bidah and separation ... The aqeedah and approach to derivation of evidences and understanding of Malik, Shafi'i and Ahmad plus those before and after, were all sunnah and "ahlu ul hadeeth" in opposition to bidah and ra'ii (opinions)... Read the treaties by Shafi'i which are many on aqeedah and his direct studebts, and you'll find them all "hanbali and ahlu ul hadeeth" just as the narrations from Malik regarding istiwa, nuzul , quran being Kalam Ullah and Iman etc... They are all opposed to what is asha'ri and maturidi, which are inheritors of the earlier mu'tazilah and jahmiyyah... Read the sayings and belief of ja'd, jahm and bishr and they're similar to Al asha'ri and Al maturidi... But people don't study the religion they claim to be of, but use their time debating with Christians instead.... So they know about NT manuscripts and early Christian sects etc but are totally ignorant about Islam ...

[@user-hk9gc1pg7s]

Sheikh Ali Monowicz Ahari are not sunni.

[@sheikhalimonowicz8634]

MillatulHunafa You are mostly right however Islam isn't an Arab thing , it's a Universal spiritual path and the continuing current of the ancient Wisdom and Knowledge since the beginning of Time , and esotericism is an essential part of it according to the first generations of the first three Centuries Indeed as taught by the great masters and scholars of wisdom during the first 3 generattions of the first 3 centuries as taught by The Prophet PBUH , Imam Ali AS , Imam Hussein AS , Al Mukhtar , Ibn Al Hanafiyyah , Imam Sajjad , Imam Jaafar , Imam Maymun Al Qadah and his son , Ibn Hayyan , Bastami , Tusturi , Hallaj , Imam Baqir and many other Imams scholars , saints and Ahlulbayt of the first three Centuries and first generations , but I know that our lineage differs from the Sunnis . What you said regarding Ahmad Ibn Hanbal , Malik and Shafi'i is absolutely true however Abu Hanifa was somehow pro the late Ash'ariyya view of the Quran as they believe that the Quran has a created aspect and an uncreated aspect so Abu Hanifa was of this opinion as well which makes him unique in this case and in disagreement with the rest of the Sunni schools , the rest of what you said is true , I've engaged in many debates with Ash'ariyya and their likes and they insist that Imam Shafi , Malik , Hanbal , Dhahabi , Ibn Hajar of Ashkelon and many others were pro Sufism ! . I've tried to clarify this misconception to them but they never listen , for indeed neither Shafi nor Malik or Ahmad or Dhahabi or any of those Sunni scholars were Sufis or even favored Sufism by any means they even made takfir against our saints ! actually Sufism according to Ash'ariyya is no more than the celebration of the Mevlid and visiting Saint's Shrines , they don't hold any of our core sufi beliefs tightly , they are totally deviated from our Ancient authentic Sufi path , however some of them are one of us but they prefer to practice Taqiyyah as some of our historic figures did in the past but I don't like that for Taqiyyah is confusing and serve no one , anyway this type is relatively few while the majority are just Sunnis who celebrate Mevlid and visit shrines without believing in our core beliefs , I don't know why they even call themselves Sufis ! even their sheikhs teaches that sufism is just asceticism ! I say if it just asceticism then Salafis can call themselves Sufis as well ! Maybe they are just having issues with Salafis/Atharis /Ahlulhadith and just want to distinguish themselves . You are right too for yes Mu'tazilah , Jahmiyyah , Murji'ah and Kharjites as well all have spread amongst Sunnism , however in my opinion and experience with Modern Sunnis I think that the vast Majority of common Sunnis today are just Murji'ah while their scholars aren't Murji'ah . Anyway Ash'ariyya , Maturidiyya , Barelviyya , Deobandiyya can claim the Sunni label through the teachings of Abu Hanifa which seems to be mostly inline with their teachings , also Salafiyya , Athariyya , Ahlul Hadith can claim the sunni label as well through the teachings of Ibn Hanbal , Shafi and Malik but mostly Ibn Hanbal .

[@sheikhalimonowicz8634]

البريق اللامع You may be right per the Chechnya Conference for they have excluded Atharis from the banner of Sunnism but in reality Athari are Sunnis as well for they just follows the teachings of Ahmad Ibn Hanbal which makes them part of Sunnism despite the claims made by the Ash'ariyya , Matrudiyya and their likes . I don't see much difference either between them it's no more than a Political game maybe between some countries , Allah knows best .

[@jamesj5696]

Trying to convince people that magic is real. It is time to put religion away and grow as humans.

[@faithfulsoldier519]

Honestly he makes sense, I don't think you have watched the whole lecture!

[@celestialknight2339]

james j Not only is your comment utterly misplaced since the person of Muhammad (peace & blessings be upon him) is overwhelmingly established as a historical figure (not magic), but indeed the only magic is believing that a blind & unconscious universe was coincidentally so fine-tuned, in numerous universal constants with incredible precision, as to allow the formation of complex, conscious, self-aware, and rational lifeforms through billions of years of random atomic collisions. This, my friend, is magic. And even more than this, your own worldview postulates that you yourself are absolutely nothing but a random amalgamation of carbon atoms, merely possessing the illusion of reality & design. There is no difference between you and a spittle on the sidewalk- except the difference of atoms and their re-arrangements. So how can you trust yourself and your own thoughts? How do you even know that you are rational, when your brain is merely a collection of jerking electrons? And don’t say evolution, because 1) evolution itself has the goal of survival & reproduction, not rationality, and 2) that would be circular reasoning because your very response would be utilizing your brain, which is still a product of the process of this blind evolution. Therefore, everything you think and say, including your very own comment above, is ultimately nothing but the product of billions of years of material & chemical randomness- it is pure brain barf. This is your worldview, not mine. So for you to even think that you can objectively use rationality & reasoning to disprove religion, which postulates an ultimate & transcendent Creator of the universe- THAT is magic. So thank you, Magician James.

[@TruthIsSalvation]

james j your statement is indicative of how a child talks, clearly, people grow as humans. What on earth are you on about?

[@TruthIsSalvation]

Yahya Snow doing an excellent job of exorcising his right to freedom of speech, deleting comments