Dr. Neil Turok - "From zero to infinity, and beyond!"

[@climbeverest]

This lecture is one of the best on KZbin, Dr Neil Turok is always a pleasure to listen to.

[@MrRichygm]

Brilliant lecture, again, from Neil. I could listen to him all night.

[@iandrummond4826]

Bns

[@MrVoayer]

Charming... Fun... Interesting... Informative... Invigorating... Imaginative... Inspiring... ! Both, Dr. Neil Turok and his lecture !

[@LaureanoLuna]

0:32:25 He says that the vacuum energy is repulsive because it stays the same no matter how fast the vacuum moves. Can anyone shed some light upon this relation or give a reference?

[@deckiedeckie]

Could listen to this man, all day long....

[@garychapman7776]

Dr Turok raises the conundrum : "Why did the big bang have density variations ?" Maybe I'm missing something obvious... but... Wouldn't the intrinsic uncertainty and quantum fuzziness of the physics already account for this? Wouldn't we be incredibly unlikely to see a smooth sphere ... but rather, a sort of ambiguous cloud of density possibilities averaging a sphere. Then, according to whichever interpretation subscribed to, one particular potential fuzzy configuration would become our predecessor state leading to our observably lumpy universe? (MWI for example, then holding that each state was an equally valid ancestor state albeit in its own domain - including many temporarily perfect yet unfeasably long-lived uniform spheres somehow holding out, almost implausibly, against a hostile physics - the 'unlikely yet somewhat boring' universes) Lets imagine though, that our big bang were shown to have been a perfect uniformly-dense sphere quite late into the event... how long could this perfect state continue to hold true given the quantum nature of the universe? After all, if a single electron needn't decide where it is... or even what side of an impenetrable barrier it is on (both) ... then surely this uniform sphere would also rapidly decohere into a fuzzy cloud of lumpy potentiality... as the existing clouds of likely position compound into ever wider margins of fuzziness due to the stacking of ever more uncertain interactions. At whatever point we choose to imagine the probability function to collapse (and I'm not even certain it makes sense to assume it ever does) - you're going to get lumps. IDK. Lumpiness seems a given. Can someone explain what I'm missing.

[@glutinousmaximus]

A surprisingly lucid talk dealing with some very difficult ideas. One of the best I've seen. Thanks for posting!

[@davidfortysix]

Ff re see try

[@tybeedave]

great vid. i'm now saying that between nothing and everything is something. makes me about 10 yrs behind dr neil. i see the visible universe, accept the rest of the universe, and basically understand the multiversic entity which i call the motherverse. all in the honor of and study of mother nature's reality.

[@UncleZhou49]

It's actually Plato and Aristotle in the center of the painting (but it's still a great lecture).

[@L111GTV]

A brilliant and virtuous man. One I hope to meet some day.

[@robertm3561]

Interesting how Turok uses the phrase ..as far as we know, the universe started as a hot BB.., even in reality the earliest information we have is from BB, but surely materia didn't come to be at any point, but has always been.

[@2010sunshine]

Wonderful.. Amazing minds.

[@darwinlaluna3677]

Sir Neil Turok, you r a good person and a great physicist.

[@lishlash3749]

The square root of -1 arises not because there is an "imaginary" aspect of the universe, it is instead a consequence of the asymmetrical foundation of our mathematical number line. Positive and negative numbers are not mirror images of each other, they combine by different rules that produce asymmetrical results. In contrast to the asymmetrical polarity of the mathematical number line, electromagnetic waves exhibit a type of polarity that is perfectly symmetrical - neither charged state is inherently either positive or negative. While our mathematical formulas are valid and self-consistent, their asymmetrical properties produce counter-intuitive "imaginary" results when used to model inherently symmetrical physical phenomena.

[@elviramadigan5296]

hear hear! in clifford algebras "i" arises naturally....

[@ricolee2898]

-1 = i squared, unless you're a wacko electrical engineer like me. Then -1 = j squared, LOL, since the letter i is reserved for measuring electrical current.

[@elizondorj]

Excellent talk. Much to learn and wonder about.

[@TheTyno37]

One hundred and thirty four views!? This fine, fine lecture needs to be shared with more people! It is crazy to think only one hundred people watched this, and it is even more crazy to think about how very little people actually know about Neil Turok! He is a wonderful communicator of the universe and he deserves to be heard by more people! My idea: get Neil Turok to be president of Canada, and after, THE WORLD! :D

[@mattd2641]

Who decided it best to put the exit doors right behind the speaker?

[@KipIngram]

31:13 - How do we know it's going to keep going to infinity? He just said earlier we don't really know what the vacuum energy is. It could behave in more or less any way - until we understand it to some degree it seems foolish to talk about its dynamics as though we KNOW.

[@chochomasenya1410]

It's not that Einstein's equations breakdown at a singularity, it is mathematics under differentiation that breaks at that point. What we need is mathematics of zero much like Euler gave us the mathematics of i (= square root of a negative number). This singularity is introduced, I believe, erroneously, by the Cartesian system. It is my hope that I will correct it, perhaps via generalised co-ordinates with a proper definition of the Hamiltonian. I don't know.

[@naimulhaq9626]

The continuum representing the integers doesn't help us to understand infinity. Complex Analysis (Riemann sphere) enables us to represent infinity (at the poles) and defines the continuum as the circumference of a circle with infinite radius, so the continuum is no more a straight line. A circle has no beginning or no end (infinity). Riemann sphere also provide the mathematical model of quantum computing function (Maldacena), in which the binary states of 0 and 1 can be superimposed to give infinite dimensional state as intermediate between 0 and 1, fabricating a error-correcting QC at room temperature. Phase transition transforms non-life matter into life, which is also an error- correcting QC function at room temperature (repairing 50-70 billion damaged cells daily at 99.99 % efficiency and at lightning speed) giving rise to consciousness, intelligence, meme, etc., not to mention greed, love, hate, passion, creativity, memory, spirituality, etc.

[@davidwilkie9551]

Yep, zero-infinity cause-effect @.dt, temporal holographic dimensionality. ----- An outstanding presentation of the question implied by the Theoretical Limits.., zero-infinity cause-effect connection-containment is Singularity-Duality of the Holographic Principle Imagery projection-drawing Actuality.

[@johnsiman5063]

34:35 Dr. Turok says, “It was almost perfectly smooth.” Thus does Turok return to the SWERVE (*clinamen*) of Lucretius - of Epicurus & Democritus, of the first Atomists: *Clinamen* (derived from clīnāre, to incline) is the Latin name Lucretius gave to the unpredictable SWERVE of atoms, in order to celebrate the Atomistic doctrine of Epicurus.

[@darwinlaluna3677]

Sir Niel, in our planet, we have a season like spring summer fall winter, I think that the universe have their own season, can we think of what season can we put and unite all together?

[@michaellilly2550]

Where did that "history of the universe" image come from? I'd like a copy of it.

[@whirledpeas3477]

Download anywhere.

[@vitakyo982]

Is it possible to make a tridimensionnal map of the universe in real time ? I mean with all objects in their present position instead of seen back in time .

[@cameronmonague2361]

Interesting question...I wonder how difficult it would be to make such a map? I wonder if anyone has attempted to make such a map already? Will ask Google to find out what's out there in this regard..again great question..

[@ianian8022]

Formula for that squiggly graph must be something to behold......

[@ElSmusso]

This was a fantastic lecture by a special man. I would like to know how his theory compares to the bleak future that Lawrence Krauss paints of the universe...

[@wizardoflawz]

it isnt really controversial how the universe will end, billions of years from now...

[@Dr10Jeeps]

Excellent talk. Very enjoyable.

[@victorgaw1418]

There are distractions from people walking in the hallway outside the lecture room appearing in the small glass windows on the door behind the speaker from time to time. Easily remedied by blocking glass with removable plastic or wooden panels or simple plastic blinds or curtains. Thank you.

[@burrbonus]

REPLY: (The words at the end of the following video clip) kzbin.info/www/bejne/eHakgIStabaUhpY

[@robertbrandywine]

Just announced that gravitational waves have been detected.

[@JohnMartin-jx1wz]

Wrong

[@TheGodlessGuitarist]

Nice to hear a serious physicist challenge the popular universe models of our day

[@48acar19]

+TheGodlessGuitarist There are still 5% of the people not liking the presentation because it is not about Jesus Kraist.

[@dendennis9060]

Thank you, infinite intelligence

[@darwinlaluna3677]

Thank sir NEIL TUROK

[@KNemo1999]

"Vacuum energy is repulsive" is the most recent joke in physics, certainly not the oldest.

[@vitakyo982]

Are laws of gravitation correct ? Imagine two stars of equal mass , but the density of one of them is far superior to the other , is space bended the same way ?

[@ianian8022]

Don't understand how big rip or whatnot happens if energy is conserved. Presumably the vacuum energy decreases in value as space expands? Else it seems more space makes more energy makes more space makes....less sense?

[@andrewwells6323]

7:10 pretty sure it's Plato and Aristotle not Plato and Socrates.

[@robertm3561]

IF its true, that the materia that exploded in BB will not collapse back to itself, it must be that there is significantly more materia in the universe, than has been observed so far.

[@wizardoflawz]

i would like to know how time is really a knowable thing at the big bang, Light hasnt even been created yet so how you measure or estimate 400,000 years of one stage or another is maybe not knowable

[@comprehensiveboycomprehens8786]

If you heard the ultraviolet catastrophe quantisation solution explained here for the first time count yourself lucky. KZbin is full of videos purporting to explain it but not doing so. Prof. Turok gives the best analogy out there. There is a fourteen year old Indian kid who comes close as well :). Forget the rest.

[@khufu8699]

But why would objects not scale up as well? They are filled mostly with the same space they claim is scaling up. Seems to be a logic issue here.

[@clawpuss2]

LOL, the people peeking in the window behind the lecturer..Great lecture tho.

[@MrVaypour]

+clawpuss2 You expect us to scroll through all 1:12:58 to find what you are referring to?

[@oecleus0]

no you were just supposed to notice it and find it amusing as you naturally watch the video

[@MrVaypour]

oecleus0 Most of the time i don't watch these, i listen to them as i enter sleep.

[@TheXitone]

we all do

[@PapaKakaes]

Eek a Mouse all do what? Listen to these as we nod off to sleep? I'm not alone this? Wow good to hear, because I have been sleeping to lectures for years and have a hard time falling asleep without one going. I skip anything under an hour usually.

[@vitakyo982]

Does this huge density of matter , close to the origin , means the universe has been a black hole at a certain moment ?

[@margaretalberts9920]

VITA kyo.

[@darwinlaluna3677]

Or so where the repulsive gravity came from? If the universe have edge then The edge is the repulsive gravity itself?

[@tigranohanyan3321]

The 2011 Nobel Prize in physics was awarded today to Saul Perlmutter at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Brian Schmidt at the Australian National Lab and Adam Reiss at Johns Hopkins University for their discovery of the accelerating expansion of the universe. Big crunch will never happen. Wrong.

[@davidwilkie9551]

Zero in infinity is/are congruent vanishing point/s? Nested loops? Beyond measure, at the limits? Big Bang theory is the new physics version of the "Fountain of youth" story.

[@contemplatico]

If the Universe did not provide 'liveable' conditions - we would not be here, watching this video would we? Suppose the universe had been 'born' radically different - and apparently hostile to life as we know it ? Would life simply not also have been shaped quite differently? Its an "Ouroboros" speculation i think - the snake that eats its own tail :P

[@davidwilkie9551]

"Infinity and beyond" (?) Metastable evolution of the standing wave function, (..of duration not "size"), where information "turns over" at the "top" of the integrated connection, (..at "absolute" zero), because unity in temporal - temporary-uncertain existence, is self*-defining a quantized number sequence of primary resonance states, in proportion, in the interval 1-0 omnidirectional/omnidimensional superposition - quantum singularity-now. ..As an extract and abstraction of the terminology used in mathematical preconditions, concepts point to an objective calculation of the pivotal qualitative functions related to identified-quantized quantities ...derived by reverse principle (reciprocal) from physical entities. Eg atom smashing rewinds from the images obtained to calculate "initial conditions" in the universe. The singularity-now is a universal constant of all information and proportions of continuity. (Or, what is the topic again? Reiteration development cycles of changing shapes) The concept of the Quantum connection is projected as a phase-interference information state, (M-theory), condensed from self*-measured time into energy, space and matter, so if one realizes..., (makes an interpretation of perceived reality), that physical existence is the phase-locked, or located projection (observation equivalent) of time, from "here-now" (zero point origin coordinate), ..the inherent knowledge of mechanism by experience, interference self-measurement in quantization, is the natural world - and detachment or displacement of "self*" is the source of "mystery" that is a perception problem. Ie a computer technician could explain the function of the mechanism of devices that produce screen images in a way that conveys these concepts, detached from the universal principle, and consolidate the misunderstandings about what reality actually is. (Don't do it) The world IS - Definitively Quantum. ..And "fun to imagine", which is why "i" is safe to imagine as the space into which unity, the 1 identity will fit exactly, probability into possibility. Quantum universe, timespace, is the integrated quality of space (vacuum), containing (singularity-unity function of equations), as the projected observable identity quantities of difference, as objective objects in spacetime which is the +/- 1 @zero triplet of digital duality. Self* :- The word "self" is ambiguous, but that's how it is in an all-inclusive infinite state, as a matter-sense perception-measurement of relative proportion, fitted by evolution and thought to an "attitudinal" position in the universe.

[@davidwilkie9551]

Point-line-circle Geometric Representation of the "angle space" connection at the 1-0D singularity is a conjectured "Banach-Tarski" style phase-state, stratified quantum numerical emenation sequence of temporal sub events that inflate the apparent observable universe. If there's one ultimate vanishing point of unity-connection then all information is temporal-motion in-formed-duality structurally, and the QM information is a fully interpenetrating wave equation of constant dynamical formulation mathematically, including Q Number shell, orbital or horizons etc. Ie this is the principle of connection 1-0D infinity, ..eternally here-now .dt in the eternal context of there-then. ("Beyond" is the transverse Phi probability distribution of quantum information, physics-mathematics = spacetime spectrum) Or, from the definition of the "vanishing point" having position, no size, but extends in duration from zero-infinity to infinity-zero by "closed circular logic", self-defined, ..or geometrically orthogonal dynamic duration rates, "angles" of proportion, equivalent to the shaped Phi-probability of distributed existence by temporal superposition & therefore temporal duration-history substantiation. By literal definition, the vanishing point of temporal superposition describes the infinite Universe as an angular edge inside, and the closed omnidirectional superspiral of outside containment. (Conceptual observations of analytical Philosophy) _____ Professor Turok's lectures have the basic concepts of synchronised connection elemental to BBT and "beyond Infinity", (because the identification of all aspects and approaches to the definition of infinite connection of QM-Timing-spacing is classification-categorisation of Quantum Fields Modulation Mechanism in principle. From which the e-Pi-i resonance of Temporal Superposition Singularity of multiphase-state spectrum of Eternity-now can be deduced.

[@Tadesan]

Wtf!?

[@odysseus1220]

Anyone ever play the game Turok?

[@isonlynameleft]

Neil is looking more and more convincing everyday, especially with the new data coming back about the Hubble tension.

[@davidwilkie9551]

..All connection, forever, involving the evolution of humanity and perceptions of meaning as emergent, IS-ness.

[@michaellilly2550]

Some pretty extraordinary information presented here, though he's not really precise in his use of terms. For instance early on, in saying the world is not a thing (but a function) he is using "world" analogously , and not differentiating between the level of the (macroscopic) sense-world available to our senses, which is a thing, and the quantam level, which is not. For that matter, even a function is a thing, a mathematical being

[@darwinlaluna3677]

Maybe the repulsive gravity is the one that creates a space in the universe and the dark matter and energy makes that space in to a universe atmosphere

[@retrosimon9843]

What if the big bang was not the beginning but the end of the universe ?

[@pebblebeach4868]

RetroSimon: you mean the beginning to the end?

[@pebblebeach4868]

RetroSimon: or it could have been the end of one universe and the beginning of another.

[@JoshYates]

Cosmic Bounce makes sense in my reality.

[@fukpoeslaw3613]

And right now we r going the wrong way?

[@ianbanna]

fine heart you make me smile: One ten billionth of a second is our linear notion of time in regards to the soundless big bang. The fact that the name big bang is used as a picture of description should point out our human entanglement 'with' understanding. If there is only continuation, time been a language used as a fathom of distance in regards to a part of movement of this continuation, than one ten billionth of a second relates to scale of present perceivable as viewable size, before this linear point still exists infinity. A lot can happen in the absent... separation or division springs to mind P.S infinity is a possible amount that will exist when needed in regards to actual usage between the physical and...... life is is is keep up the good intention "integrity is everything" remembering the human minds are a quantum moment within and part of the living universe /\ friend

[@davidwilkie9551]

The lecture from which the idea of zero-infinity difference distribution by expansion/inflation of Time Timing in Eternity-now was reconceived, and is the projection-drawing in perspective idea of the hologram. "Follow the (cause-effect) action", without the identifying labels in terms of QM-TIMESPACE Principle In-form-ation formulae.., ie the Quantum Operator format of AM-FM interference positioning Image patterns of constant creation. "Beyond Infinity" reference could be a thought experiment, toy model used for a Mathematical disproof. No connection, no logic, no-thing-now eternally at zero-infinity difference, i-reflection/symmetry-balance Origin that has been assumed to be "something from nothing" basis of BBT.., which is actually the "exploded view" of resonances from the inside and outside simultaneously/synchronously. (Assembly of a math-philosophy observational commentary is something like a kid's scrapbook, but so it goes..)

[@johnsmith1474]

Yeah or as we say, bullshit.

[@Tadesan]

I think I just had a stroke.

[@davidwilkie9551]

"Define your Terms" Philosophy-> Mathematics in/of here-now-forever localization circularity quantization identification . If e-Pi-i sync-duration connectivity, is probability ONE existence in continuity at the shape-shifting, zero-infinity cause-effect instantaneously positioning, then all phenomena are cause-effect potential logarithmic Infinity interference positioning condensation superimposed Eternity-now Interval Conception. Ie time-timing sync-duration/energy density-intensity real-numberness objects of coherence-cohesion objectives. "Infinity and beyond" could be interpreted as Quantum Operator conformal-fields substantion vibration, or mass-energy-momentum Superspin-spiral embedded Modulation of Pure Dynamic Mathematics proportioning-positioning etc. "What's in a name, a Rose by any other name will smell as Sweet". Which is why Philosophy dominates Culture over Sciencing..?

[@davidwilkie9551]

Euler's e-Pi-i 1-0-infinity, beyond Eternity-now Singularity-point reciprocation-recirculation positioning.., perception paradox holographic resolution.

[@nicknock2752]

Beyond infinity? Wow. Medication time

[@MikeRoePhonicsMusic]

3:36

[@ChaineYTXF]

Thank ye kindly

[@DrEnginerd1]

So this would mean that the universe is infinitely old with no cause?

[@vitakyo982]

Why should reality need a cause ?

[@whirledpeas3477]

What a wonderful person. I don't have much, but I would love to donate what I can.

[@mikael3536]

did they ever find the higgs boson?

[@TheGodlessGuitarist]

+Sir Miko yeah, apparently it was in the basement >)

[@sisao80]

+Mikael Shahly yup

[@pavels8890]

aha

[@messenjah71]

The ancient Mayans and ancient Egyptians were measuring time long before Anaxomander came along.

[@deckiedeckie]

Turok never said anything about Anaximander being the first....only that he brought the stick used to project the shadow that allow us to measure time... Neither the mayans o the Egyptians knew nothing about the why of things...they were great observers....Richard Feynman used to point that as the difference between the pre Colombian cultures and the greek culture ....The greeks questioned that which they were seeing...so they learned....the other did not so they knew abou when thing were happening but nit what was happening..or why...

[@messenjah71]

Deckie Deckie How can you claim that the ancient Mayans and ancient Egyptians did not know the "why" of things? Based on what?

[@ydarbg]

Is it feasible that everything we know and all mater and time is us at the other end of a black hole that we know so much/little about and that this is an on-going regurgitation of the mater/energy from a different space/time? That the first 400,000yrs 13.7 billion yrs ago (our furthest understanding) is 400,000yrs from the emergence point of all the energy on an on going basis thus constantly adding mater etc to our known universe? .... I'll put the kettle on!!!

[@dmfc593]

I assume President of a Canadian institute of some sort

[@Tadesan]

Dan Childs yeah, some sort of advanced study.

[@kebilfree17]

Pretty facetious to say you don't mean to insult, and in the next sentence calling me ignorant. I enjoyed the lecture, indeed, I have watched many of Mr Turok's lectures and always found him interesting, well spoken, and very good at conveying to the layman difficult concepts. I merely made light of a small mistake. I suppose doing that confirms my ignorance? We are doomed if everybody is as angry and sad as you, scanning the net looking for targets for your rage. Relax, eh?

[@TheRealDoctorBonkus]

Either Neil Turok or Morgan Freeman could narrorate my life. I don't care.

[@lisanoone7402]

"Window Clings"

[@drumetul_dacic]

It was not Euler who discovered the number e, but Jacob Bernoulli.

[@burrbonus]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_(mathematical_constant)

[@owynpham1478]

All these brilliant minds and we can't explain the simple orbital movements of galaxies. Instead of inventing dark matter to plug up errors in our calculations how about revisiting and reexamining our flawed assumptions. Some possibly flawed assumptions 1. Speed of light is constant. 2. Redshift implies moving away. There have been experiments and or observations that contradict both.

[@kebilfree17]

I agree

[@minakshisinha2975]

oh ,what great problem

[@biffedya]

infinity is a concept of the mind it can not exist in reality even math breaks down and gives up on infinity.

[@whirledpeas3477]

Ok

[@jim01q]

Neil, get on with it and come up with something

[@baldrbraa]

Canada has potential. Not anymore it seems.

[@sadovniksocratus1375]

There isn't TOE without T=0K

[@pkrakras3561]

This lecture is held in the most stupid theatre i have ever seen.

[@marie-claudeblouin1129]

+Fbm Brounts what, you don't like a podium right in front of the doors? lol!

[@pinball1970]

+Fbm Brounts. It is indeed- when it started I thought " whats the problem?" then the camera panned out.

[@adocampo1]

The best metaphor for the 4th dimension & if they accomodate some solitude in the lecture they probably would arrive @5th. to arrive @11th d would probably need a year or 2 of complete solitude

[@donfox1036]

Fbm Brounts, can one use a smart phone in a stupid theatre?

[@donfox1036]

In spite of what the Beetles sang, its not clear Maxwell had a silver hammer.

[@s-dohealingmovements9997]

Very suprice talking about greek woman in a painting that is not greek... (when women start voting in your civilise world Mr?) I give you an advice Mr uneducate about Hellenic history, stick with your numbers and stop interfere with greek woman and this unecesery comments because is not your territory and is not true... women born heroes and philosophers in Ancient Greece with the help of a man dont forget this! So stop misleading people, do your job and educate your self before you talk about greek women! Thanks, by the way good luck with your project !

[@dessertstorm7476]

Dr Turok, Dinosaur hunter

[@tomsawyer4776]

Maybe they can use some of their genius to figure out the audio system.

[@wretchedfibs4306]

gy=c

[@kebilfree17]

President of Canada? We have never had a president before?

[@r34ct4]

It's umm ahh, an ahh, mathematized... ahh uhh magnetizm.. english accent magnetic fields... amm uh hh ahh so ahh oh bcauhz.. God Damn.

[@MaryJones-d7e]

White Mark Lee Richard Perez Paul

[@robertbradley1251]

an hour long plus lecture on physics, concerning our very existence- and you come away with a question like that.? I am not trying to insult you, but i just dont understand-- your ignorance is baffling.. please do better or we are all doomed.

[@singsang3714]

Sounds nice, but infinity does not exist. The universe only covers a certain amount of things and numbers because the universe is not infinite.

[@glutinousmaximus]

+Sing Sang How many decimal numbers can you find between zero and one?

[@singsang3714]

As much as the universe can express in numbers. The finite amount of adressable matter and waves inside of the universe allows only finite huge number. Infinity is a thought, a phantasy, nothing more. There is no sample that physically proves infinity. I wrote about that in my book "A universe from something".

[@glutinousmaximus]

Well, good luck with it.

[@clayz1]

If it is not infinite, then it must be inside of something. What would that something be? Then what's outside of that?

[@benbucy9183]

everything begins and therefore ENDs

[@edmondcohen6087]

Not so, a continuum has NO beginnings and NO ends. Only when you bisects totality will there be a beginning and an end. but, you are almost there ~ and to get there ~~ Read Online free of charge: 01 Uni-Verse at There you'll find the Infinity Squared Equation as the "only" that can fit into the Infinite Possibilities.

[@rusty1here]

A new theory of The Light, the governing dynamic of information and the origin of life. As I present this theory I will be asking more questions, both stated and implied, than I will be answering. It is my hope that an edifying spirit of “the true desire to understand” will prevail as you join me in pondering these marvelous wonders, that science and true religion are now bringing together. What is our universe at the most fundamental level? Information, according to Professor Leonard Susskind, Stanford University's world renowned theoretical physicist, Professor Anthony Leggett Nobel Laureate and Professor Seth Lloyd. Please see The physics of information on KZbin When matter as we understand it is swallowed by a black hole what is left? Nothing it's gone, only information is left around the event horizon of a black hole as seen from our reference frame and the dimension in which we live, according to Stephen Hawking's latest earth-shattering announcement What are we then? Information, and according to the correct religious doctrine of the prophet Joseph Smith, we are a three fold being; one of flesh, one of spirit and one of the unutterable, that can neither be created nor destroyed, which I will hereafter refer to as “the transcendent us”. How does this information get organized into us? Blasphemers will say it is by chance or natural processes they can discover and therefore own. Correct doctrine says the Celestial transcendent us was firstly given a Terrestrial spiritual life by GOD our common Heavenly Father and then a Telestial flesh life through our earthly father for the purpose of being tested to determine which of these three domains we are worthy of. In the same way our Solar system, Earth and eventually us were “born Telestially,” in a nebula in an arm of the Milky Way, from the Terrestrial domain; we were also firstly “born Terrestrially” or “spiritually”, in the dense stellar region of the galactic bulge in the center of the Milky Way from the “Celestial domain” or “unutterable”. The Prophet Joseph Smith's Egyptian Alphabet and Grammar under the heading, Fifth Degree of Flosisis reads; “God has said, Let this be the center for light, and let there be bounds that it may not pass. He hath set a cloud round about in the heavens, and the light of the grand governing fifteen fixed stars center there. So God has set the bounds of light lest it pass over and consume the planets.” Consider that nearly 150 years ago, long before science had any idea of the structure of the Universe, God's prophet said that there exists “clouds round about in the heavens” This also indicates the direction and place of “our” the heavens. The center of the Milky Way. Herein lies a testable doctrine; there should be no planets in the galactic bulge. A translation from an Egyptian papyrus scroll by Joseph Smith, states that Kolob is the greatest heavenly body because it is nearest to the throne of God. The newly discoverd location of black hole CO-0.40-0.22 is intriguing, as this candidate is only 200 light-years from Sagittarius A*, our supermassive black hole. Here then is my theory: I believe God, singularities and black holes are both everything and nothing at the same time depending on our degree of freedom (dimension) and/or reference frame, and to “go thru” a black hole and reenter the ALL (to use the Nag Hammadi vernacular) one must be absolutely pure, stripped of lust, wrath and pride thus becoming “one” with the ALL i.e. God. Furthermore, I believe as we move farther and farther away from God and Sagittarius A* the governing dynamic of light lessens until corruption grows enough to embody a spirit being such as satan and eventualy fill expanding space with darkness e.i. Dark Energy. Notice the opposition of expanding space (evil expanding into nothingness) to the disapearing space of a black hole (oneness, purity, love disapearing into everything the ALL e.i. God). It's all about direction, moving away from the galactic center is degeneration moving towards the galactic center is progression. Nevertheless, we all must make the “Hero's journey” to lesser realms and be tested, that we may thus progress back to the All “our God”. I believe this is happening all over our galaxy and others. Joseph Smith taught us that ALL things were first created spiritually, THEN temporally. To come to terms with this, we must first come to terms with the true nature of God which is that He is literally our spiritual Father and ALL of creation at the same time and what the latest empirical evidence and theoretical physicists are telling us, whom are currently stuck in the mud; and test the revelations and doctrine of the one and only true religion on this earth that relates to these questions that we may move forwards. Yes, there are many Gods and They are ONEWhat follows are the proofs for and why I believe these revelations and doctrines are worth testing...1) They make intuitive sense, particularly when we accept that there are likely 10 dimensions of space. Please see Imagining the 10th dimension by Rob Bryanton on KZbin. This allows for the following astonishingly simple yet irrefutable conjectures. 2) The (0,0) on an x, y axis can be any number you want it to be depending on the angle in which you approach it, because it is a “removable singularity”. Please see Problems with Zero - Numberphile. Furthermore, 1/x=infinity goes off to infinity in opposite directions. I take these to elude to the function of a black hole from our reference frame in three dimensions moving the sublime to the divine and visa versa. 3) Is there any doubt that light is solely responsible for creating and sustaining life as we know it? The governing dynamic for ALL connected, interacting and dependent relationships from our Governments down to the quantum level of our bodies and world in our Telestial reference frame IS what game theory calls the Nash Equilibrium, which is in fact a mathematical description of the governing dynamic Christians call the Light of Christ. The governing dynamic within the Galactic bulge is very different from our 50% light and 50% dark, as there is no darkness. Thus the beings that live there are different spiritual, terrestrial beings in fact. There is no doubt that light is solely responsible for creating and sustaining life as we know it. What life does the darkness give? None, it consumes the life that dwells within it. What is in-between selfishness and selflessness? The Nash Equilibrium, our governing dynamic. Consider Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Where is it pointing to? Selflessness, The Light. What does Maslow's hierarchy of needs rest upon? Earth. What does the Earth rest upon? Supernovas (just one outshines an entire Galaxy! and is the beginning of a black hole), The Light. The beginning and the end. The Alpha and the Omega. Who did Jesus say He was just before He was crucified? “I Am The Light And The Life”. 4) It is widely accepted in physics that ALL black holes AND the beginning of the universe are singularities. This idea is strongly supported by correct doctrine if one understands the true nature of GOD. Namely that; GOD is family and GOD is and is not (please see Imagining the zeroth dimension by Rob Bryanton on KZbin). Am I saying GOD lives in a black hole? Yes and no, and so does His family ancestry and so will His posterity. I am also saying that black holes are the end and the beginning, the nothing and the ALL of creation in the same instant. This can be understood from higher dimensions, the black holes of our Universe folded back, like a manifold Klein Bottle, into the One, the All, even God 5) There is a rock solid connection between physics and religion. The Masons accept all faiths and their symbolism can be found splattered all over the USA's capital, currency, architecture and artwork. Many presidents, statesmen and proponent men through history have been Masons, Joseph Smith was a Mason. The Masons have been obsessed with the Pythagorean triangle and the numbers associated with it for at least a Millennium, it is all over their artwork, architecture, buildings etc., etc.. A little weird yes, now enters Neil Turok director of Perimeter Institute of Physics. Please see his KZbin video; The Astonishing Simplicity of Everything. Wherein, he tells us, the conclusion based on the empirical evidence gathered from all the super colliders, top physicists and mathematicians from around the world, is that all the physical laws of the universe can be described by the governing dynamic of the Pythagorean theorem that produces the probability wave function in quantum mechanics. 6) I believe that our consciousness is a removable singularity and is the missing part in Stephen Hawkins rounded off and empty universe as described by Neil Turok in; The origins of the universe. Please read Wikipedia's removable singularity. 7) Science AND religion will remain stupefied and stuck until it comes to terms with this Apocalypse or “unveiling” that is even now dawning upon us. As evidenced by today's seemingly insurmountable impasses in physics and the obviously horrific problems with world religions currently transpiring in the world. Why? Because when we understand what science is telling us about true religion and vise a versa we will have peace through the knowledge of The Truth which is; We are all brothers, Jesus is the Christ and His priesthood authority is disseminated through his church, even the Church of Jesus Christ and Latter-Day Saints. Amen I Am that I Am, a contradiction. Only thru Grace do I have Hope. Russell Scott Williams 4/1/16

[@TheXitone]

yes! keep it up ,so mental! not as nuts as david icke but still a joy to behold. boing!

[@ianian8022]

A lot of stuff and nonsense!!!!!!