Neil Turok Public Lecture: The Astonishing Simplicity of Everything

[@chaosinthematrix]

I don’t think I’ve ever heard physics so well explained. Neil is an incredible teacher and intellect.

[@itsjuliam]

I thought I hated physics throughout my schooling years. Now I realize I hated how it was taught. Because here I am at 1a.m. absolutely captured by the speaker, the subject & the delivery.

[@robthenorm]

i totally agree with you.

[@____uncompetative]

My physics teacher threatened to throw me out of his class because I was asking too many questions.

[@comdrive3865]

@@____uncompetative that means the teacher doesn't want to look like a fool if you ask a question that he doesn't know the answer to. Also means your teacher is a right twat with a massive ego

[@comdrive3865]

@@vectteur no

[@davisthedavis]

Well sometimes you actually have to learn the math and that’s not as fun

[@stanleyyelnats1313]

I'm simply amazed by how truly clear of a picture this man can paint! This lecture has spun my mind into several different thoughts and views, regarding truths I've "known" my entire life. It's made me late for work.....lol I need to peek a bit deeper into the past....so I may arrive on time and miss the lecture I'm about to receive at my job... 😱😞🤪🙃 peace and love to ALL who read this :)

[@jensschirner6137]

How can it possibly be that the great minds are never known in public, not on TV? What does that tell about our society? Wonderful!!

[@vanleeuwenhoek]

The notion of the public and of TV are in flux for certain, but we do have platforms like this site, and others like tik tok where well-meaning people who want to spread Turok et al's greatest presentations can be empowered to 'evangelize.' To quote Captain Planet: "the power is in your hands!"

[@goblinsRule]

The media is owned by interests whose primary goal is to make money out of public, and as such these great minds don't make make any penny for them, hence we watch Pawn Stars, Kardashians, Taylor Swift etc., individually they don't add any value to our life, but make us not feel bored or feel fakely connected to something while living our terrible life.

[@mrhassell]

The great minds, have no intrest in being known.

[@campursarian1977]

TV is for entertainment.

[@zorbathegreek2106]

What an amazing talk! One would sit through till the end as if it were an orchestra. The stillness of the audience is the very vacuum which held all the condensed matter Mr. Turok delivered. Masterpiece of a lecture! So proud of the 100 minutes I spent on the internet. Thanks a lot, Perimeter Institute. Thanks a lot, Dr. Turok.

[@susiantopulaalo7223]

HiFriend APA KHABAR, MIBAKSO, TR ads@MD://https:BOxOFfic 2022SUx3sFitdanfoot on SaturdaYflagChoco llatedanlistsenbath/WCentre band Brand Hollanders oldest18:34 SU Uukids NgieO Wow wow new WOrds Ok

[@rickelliott2092]

Neil. Beyond brilliant. Your mastery of language, presentation and depth of knowledge is remarkable. You are indeed a wonderful scientist. You have reignited my thirst for knowledge. I’ve reapplied to University at 76 years of age. Bravo young man! The switch has been turned on again. R. Elliott

[@helenfish8915]

Good luck your story in turn has inspired me !!( I'm not as brave as you to attend University! 🤗 But if you can do it then I can !.. Im not always healthy) But I need to get my Career up n running so I'm learning on line!!! .... Thanks I was wallowing!!!

[@TerryPullen]

Neil is my new most favorite physicist. This was the most remarkable explanation of physics I have ever seen. He explained some of the most important concepts of physics clearly and succinctly. An incredible ride through the history of physics. Wow! Lecture begins at 8:47

[@Mistwalker67]

He's incredibly humbling and funny for his field

[@SantoshK.Mangalore]

I am grateful that KZbin posted this video my way. Very simple language used for very complex theories. In our Vedic Sanatan philosophy time is cyclic in nature. It says the Big Roar was the start of creation and the present creation is the 84th in existence. The Puzzle "why matter is more abundant than anti-matter" was something that made my ears prick up. Cause I had written a science assignment for my 10th class in 1965 and had written "antimatter in its separate space would be as stable as matter". I joined IIT KGP for Applied Maths. Later became a social activist working with Tribals. A checkered life, no complaints. Agnostic - yes I am. Seeking with an open mind. Thank you for reading my doodle. 🕉️🙏

[@cornwillmentoor8583]

The way the lecture, saturates your mind and enters your heart is almost spiritual. It brought healing to my soul. A peace.

[@Doppe1ganger]

I could close my eyes and fall asleep, not because it's boring, on the contrary, but because the material and the way it's told is calm and relaxing.

[@FearsomeR4Z3]

Are kidding me?! I do this all the time. I'm doing it right now to this video. It's ASMR but with interesting topics where you can learn as you fall asleep.

[@nirmalchandrapati1985]

The best lecture I listen to in last 40 years,after my Physics classes in Pre university ,so easy to follow and understand, the lecture has regenerated my interest in Physics,

[@gayefontoura3292]

TV DC DC TV

[@gayefontoura3292]

By by

[@MichaelSmith-oy3gi]

yhxvcc

[@markmunday4978]

When I saw the length of this video (99 minutes) I thought way too long but I will give it a few minutes. I ended up being glued to the screen for the whole time. Very engaging and really useful insights.

[@kamion53]

I almost clicked it away became my KZbin algoritms had connected me with a lecture by creationist, liar and science denier Frank Turek, who uses his scientific education to baffle his audience with complicated science terms. I got glued to the screen too, once prof Turok unfolded his very understandable explanation of very complicated matter.

[@MARKCREEKWATER1]

Neil Turok is a true "gentleman and scholar" ----- as one can see by his calm, humble, and deliberate manner of speaking, his wonderful smile (showing some of the nicest-looking teeth in physics !!), and his total lack of any trace of arrogance. This video has made him one of my favorite people !! Best, Mark Creek-water Dorazio, amateur physics enthusiast, Phoenix .....

[@darrenmeservia5578]

Been following Turok for, eek, decades(?) now. He has only improved with age. He's one of the good ones, for sure!

[@RC-pw4hy]

I agree ...

[@syedalishanzaidi1]

I only repeat what other people have already said here. This is one of the most lucid and beautiful lectures I have ever listened to. His graphics and videos were stunning and a great help in moving understanding forward in a subject difficult for laymen like myself to grapple with. Compliments also to the audience who one could see were all seemingly composed of academics and skilled thinkers who sat in pin-drop silence from beginning to end. This lecture and its audience defined for me what is finest in the intellectual persuits and achievements of the human race.

[@legalfictionnaturalfact3969]

For All We know, There is no live audience.

[@09SURGEON]

I cried because I now seem to understand what I had missed: a physics teacher who connected everything and my desire to want to learn more and hear more never diminished. The young man’s question made me guilty: I should have pursued my love for physics 40+ years ago….and never would I have looked back. Thank you so much for generating so much verve in me. Thank you.

[@prestonhendrix1199]

You cried?

[@comdrive3865]

@@prestonhendrix1199 is there a problem officer?

[@raaspider]

to teach at this level means the instructor has a deep understanding of the basics which is often what you don't find in a "difficult" subject like physics

[@brahimaouad9902]

@@comdrive3865 es s Las à www w www wsq

[@abhipsha5166]

Wow that is beautiful…. Getting emotional because you connect with something you so passionately love is beautiful. Beautiful is an understatement

[@TomCourtney]

This was excellent. The fact that you could explain such complex topics in an elegant and simple way is just amazing. Thank you.

[@4fingers183]

pls sum-up the things you learned? :D

[@gazmasonik2411]

@@4fingers183 learned that science has become a fund a mental scam.

[@paulgagnon9830]

Gaz Masonika, awww, so cute, you just couldn’t understand a thing.

[@virtualmoyda7221]

You should checkout Brian Greene and his most recent books or Sean Carol(e?). This lecture was not bad but these two take it even further and can explain much of what is left to be questioned here (deterioration, reverse gravity pulses, kaons, dekaons and how/what triggered the big bang (temperature) and birthed our universe out of an energy dimension/universe). A few clues without spoiling the subject.

[@virtualmoyda7221]

@@gazmasonik2411 then you do not understand science and have the scientific method/mind confused with achademia/buisnes.

[@vgfxworks]

I can't help but think how one can be so calm and relaxed while speaking in public. Great presentation !

[@Dick_Gozinya]

I have noticed that the more logical someone is, the less they fear speaking in public.

[@xmfclick]

I used to be nervous as hell about speaking in front of any public that numbered more than about three people. Then I taught middle school for a couple of years, and the fear left me. I recommend it.

[@aliasofanalias7448]

@@Dick_Gozinya Left and right brain isn't it. Logical people are generally less emotional

[@cac2244]

One of the bright side of the pandemic is that we have more time to learn and discover new things and this lecture is just fascinating.

[@sas6561]

Pity the person sitting next to or in front of the person who kept spreading his germs with a continuous cough!

[@carlosidelone8064]

@@sas6561 They weren't "HIS" germs. They were GOD's germs.

[@carlosidelone8064]

Well, the thought came to me, that we are looking at the universe through a STRICTLY human viewpoint and assuming, that OUR VIEWPOINT can register a valid representation of reality. Very different beings may perceive reality very differently.

[@sas6561]

@@carlosidelone8064 ... thanks for clarifying Carlos!

[@康奈尔威廉]

Yes

[@susanevans1294]

I am getting some of it, slowly it makes sense. I will listen and watch this many times. Your style of teaching reaches my novice brain. Thank you.

[@nishantintouch]

Susan Evans You are a woman. Ofcourse you have a novice brain. Chill

[@clivewells7090]

Susan Evans; this is more than most people take in on a whole degree course. I hope the people in the audience got dvd's to study at home!

[@darrylschultz6479]

@@nishantintouch silly comment.

[@I_Am_AI_007]

All of us have a novice brain. I have a brain that is exceptionally novice lol 😂

[@karamjitsingh5338]

@@I_Am_AI_007 how novice is a novice brain listen to bad brains it's only rock and roll I

[@Arsenic71]

What a fascinating lecture. I may not understand everything Neil explains, but I do understand much of it. He is a great educator and a very sympathetic person. Great talk, very informative, thanks for publishing this!

[@mehmetsarikaya1157]

Nice review of physics of everything (nearly) as we know today!

[@justaccount6369]

ccccccccccccccc

[@justaccount6369]

ccccccccccccccc

[@zmo1ndone502]

What an amazing talk and what an amazing voice

[@ryansimpson5776]

That was the best math presentation I've seen in a long time. I wish I had teachers who could made math interesting, I probably would had a different life, instead of waiting til 37 to live.

[@dankuchar6821]

I created a Physics\Mathematics class for High School. I was successful because students found that math could help them understand the physics, yet the Math alone meant nothing because it was too abstract. I wish more mathematics could be taught this way.

[@oo88oo]

I tutored math and physics for years and I had a real knack for it and loved it, and my students loved it, and I was going to become a math teacher, but then I failed the official California math teacher certification essay question, “Why would Hillary Clinton make a great President?”

[@ninehundredxd8833]

Lol that`s what i was thinking about as well! :)

[@steveperreira5850]

This is just delightful and wonderful, with a warm and engaging genius. I need to watch this over and over

[@vadimbellous8313]

@@oo88oo Wow, at first I thought you were joking about getting asked such an irrelevant question. Then again it makes perfect sense and shows how they filter out the "wrong think" among the staff they hire. America is completely fu*ked. "Give us the child for 8 years and it will be a Bolshevik forever" Vladimir Lenin

[@geezergonewile]

One of the best physics presentations I've ever seen. TY for the clarity ... so far!

[@SoonerSquatch]

Explain what you learned?

[@LeroyBored]

@@SoonerSquatch you’re a wave?

[@Limbiclesion]

Neil …this is one the best lectures I have heard in 40 odd years as an academic ..your presentation style is impeccable ..your reduction of complexity to a level anyone can comprehend is masterful ..plus you seem to be a really nice human being… if you have students they are so lucky to have such a great teacher 🙏🙏🏿👍🎩👏👏🦄

[@liamchild9741]

What a wonderfully lucid presentation,I love his clear diction and calm explanations of the impossible.

[@davidofmorris]

High priest in the church of the absurd. Run.

[@iroulis]

@@davidofmorris That c.h.u.r.c.h. is what gifted you the ability to write your comment h.e.r.e.

[@pjoeberlin]

I´m happy to mention that the mere gravitational physics Paradigm is about to leave the podium. The big bang model, black hole, dark matter, dark energy, "loneliness of empty space" universe is obsolete. This began with Wilhelm Weber in the 1850´s, went also thru nobel price winner Hannes Alfven on the Record, as well as many others, and is called the Electric Universe Theory. I tried to debunk it to my self, having held lectures about the "settled science" model, but after some time, not long, the EU (Electric Universe Theory) just won in every way. Give it some contemplation and these kind of lectures here seem rather funny. Sophisticated, well funded, colossal fallacies! But that is the nature of science, isnt it? The big problem today is the special interest of where the funding comes from ...

[@MaxxPwrrr]

I agree. So lovely to listen to.

[@lesliekollerprivate5062]

@Brad Watson I hope you dish didn't/don't reproduce.

[@MaxxPwrrr]

I love the way this man speaks and presents this material so articulately. I find it so soothing to listen to as it washes over my mind and really engages my full attention. Thank you for posting.

[@david-pb4bi]

I disagree, thought he was very poor at explaining more confused now than when he started.

[@treborsirrah7916]

I agree,though i must admit, late at night when I'm listening to him in bed ,i do nod off

[@tracyavent-costanza346]

I must confess that it is strangely stimulating to have ideas presented which are mostly outside of the boundary of things I have thought about. Maybe it is something about needing additional space in theoretical models I HAVE THOUGHT ABOUT to accommodate some of these.

[@laurentdubois2268]

Amazing. I think I almost understood everything (I may have to watch this twice to really understand everything). I love the way Neil talks, he is very clear, he makes it simple for everyone. Thank you for sharing.

[@innosanto]

If you cannot sY it simply you do not inderstand it.

[@tortysoft]

Utterly astonishing. So, I'm not daft after all ! Scale is important !. Wonderful linking of maths concepts to each other right up to the end of time. Clarity of description plus that linkage solidifies things wonderfully for me.

[@Anthony-sn9kl]

Scale is important

[@SoonerSquatch]

What a joke ! This entire lie, makes believers? Hahaha

[@chocolatecityoutlaw6258]

@@SoonerSquatch Duh, what's up doc?

[@Salsadans123]

Thank you for sharing this. It is a relieve to see people with interests in sience. Sometimes I take comfort in these kinds of things on the internet to escape the superficiality of my environment. Certainly in recent years it seems as if wonder and dreams are coming under increasing pressure. I have few people around me who still question themselves other than the most basic things. Away from (this is not a discussion) the increasing pressure to have opinions about everything and the emerging religious dogma and the aversion to anything to do with science.

[@ganzentspannt7172]

I feel u :)

[@kpzcbttp]

What a charming man, a joy to listen to.

[@gabkoost]

+kpzcbttp I personally think he is a Dick.

[@kpzcbttp]

+GabKoost Takes one to know one, I suppose.

[@gabkoost]

kpzcbttp I am not a Dick. But he definitely is.

[@stvbrsn]

+GabKoost Very cute. But I think the original comment was regarding the speaker not the Dick giving the intro. :)

[@JoshYates]

+kpzcbttp The host had a last name "Dick"

[@dstew8540]

Excellent instruction Clearly Director Turok LOVES what he does. I don't think I've ever heard anyone turn physic's into a story book hour as he does. Definitely, a very fine tuned and unique art.

[@jasonestrada7581]

l llllll llll l ll

[@hiufuxthevideographer9877]

Interactive Park Studies kzbin.info/www/bejne/goi8h3ltqtiLi9U

[@sprightlyrandom1550]

I’ve watched a lot of public science lectures looking for one to give me an overview of theoretical physics and I have to say this was easily the best, very cohesive. The speaker manages to pack a lot of important points around each topic without making it overwhelming, this surely will inspire a lot of curiosity and admiration for physics

[@cesarrojo1960]

Just FYI, watched the entire video and was captivated by a different perspective without taking a different pov as far as opinions. In a nutshell it is good to see different perspectives on opinions not just on belief. Fixed belief is in expectable

[@ossiedunstan4419]

Opinion is not fact until the science supports them. A fucking philosopher does not base their opinion on facts , read any philosopher , PHILOSOPHER`S do personal opinion not science.

[@jefferyhankins1370]

@@ossiedunstan4419 220 wow

[@kamo7809]

Lol are you arguing with science?

[@markrockliff2286]

Thank you Professor Turok. If I intuit you algebraic explanation for i2 = -1 It infers that The Absolute implicate location is omni locational. Its location is the Quantum of the Bell Curve between the Two directions of the created creation. The continuations or continuous between future and past, Dual Universes. You are correct, simplicity. I think we may both appreciate the simplicity that takes place at Point: 9 [(9:0) - (9:1)] Nine belongs to both sides and the binary of the One and Zero is sheared between the two. Between the sheared functionality of the unity between the symbiotic of the two/both Universes. Who would have thought the functional opposing natures of the left brain and the right brain of Mind would tern out to be such a close mirror and catalyst for revealing the natrure of the truth and the solution. Cheers. Mark Anthony Rockliff.

[@The1SuperAtheist]

I really enjoyed this lecture. It calms me down and relaxes me. I watch this at least once a week. I'm kinda addicted to lectures

[@erixdoang1585]

D3kjhoo

[@eduardocavanagh]

What is astonishing to me ( a physicist) is the clarity of Neil Turok in explaining this, the physics and mathematics of the universe. A master teacher, to present this profound mystery with such simplicity

[@goldnutter412]

No mystery with a new model. Still bound by faith in.. math of the undefined. This theoretical moment in time is impossible, and the Planck uncertainty limit is because our extremes of visibility going both ways.. optics.. inverse of the optics is both advancements in essentially both directions. Already been modeled in a new way that anyone who wants to equate in terms used now.. cant start to talk about things in a new way. But if you throw out every assumption. If you want it to work.. QUANTA ? FREAKING QUANTA You cannot use infinity in your math. And you can NOT USE NON INTEGER assumptions. But you can model this entire reality with the kind of computing power that is opposite to what the experience of life in this universe tells you. Thats far too big. It cant be conceptualized. Well.. not with such massive assumptions and ignoring the elephant over and over. Simplicity ? elegant model without particles... ok it works.. but.. so god is a computer ? or I am an AI or some shit ? People just get lost here... All in good time. Its beyond easy. And the old model will die instantly in your own.. shameful realisation. It really was completely wrong.. maybe you are just dreaming.. ahh head hurts ? All in good time :-) undeniable except for "in denial". Logic has to be obeyed. Your model of reality is not == reality. Your model of reality says.. something is wrong. BANDAID MATH F

[@KosmiekAltertainment]

What a fantastic teacher. Thank you very much Perimeter Institute and Mr turok!

[@evrardmusic]

Turok is a pure genius and joy to listen to.

[@leon_noel1687]

He's the strongest player in the game curently.

[@Hythlodaeus69]

Having a very rudimentary mathematical foundation, that whole “i” shpeel he gave really threw me off my rocker. That’s so freaking cool

[@quantumpotential7639]

Well. You said it. Ï-$hpéél Now what to do with it? 🤔

[@dunuth]

Indeed. High school was far worse than useless for me: making something so brilliantly elegant seem oppressive and nonsensical. I chose biology therefore :) Not that I regret it... But, seriously, it wasn't new because I actually had seen that explanation on a fantastic KZbin channel of all places (3Blue1Brown) but the understanding of that makes me want to go back and start again, academically.

[@_barncat]

F joe biden

[@ohnitro8850]

@@dunuth p

[@ohnitro8850]

@@dunuth p

[@user990077]

Finally an explanation on KZbin of Plank's constant that is easy to understand.

[@RobertPreeti]

Such simplicity can only be derived from deep understanding. Excellent scientist and brilliant public lecture by Neil Turok. I love the way he puts you at ease.

[@jimgeary58]

please get more lectures by this man. listening to him is an absolute pleasure. can't handle degrasse-tyson, kakau or krauss' stand up bs. jim al khalili is good too. it should be about the topic, not the speaker. of course, sagan is still greatly missed.

[@MikkelGrumBovin]

Spot on ! Theres nothing more toecrumbling , than , see De Grasse Tyson´s neverchanging "Ha-ha-ha , They dont believe in NASA , but they belive in UFO´s ..hahahahah - (and then the finale ;) "TinFoilHats"(this is where he make foodnoises, rolls his eyeballs, and make a salaciousness little dance of pride -), - and i simply CHOOSE , not to TALK to them - cause they are TOO stupid" (Great MO , from Cosmologist, and TeeWee Consensus Pope ! ) - then we got a full on Smartass , Cocky, leery, unsymphatic, downright ugly piece of shit ! - Lawrence "Craterface" Krauss- i wont have to go any further with him - ill get vgomitreflexes, and abhorent facial experessions,- cause he´s simply a degrasso Tyson Clone, without ANY redeeming characters, just a bully , and a smartass prick,- which leaves me with Michio Kaku - The LEAST "Smartassy" , and least unFunny , of these bullies - BUT..... he have a sad tendency , to get REALLY angry , and outright.... weird ... if, and WHEN... anyone , accuse him , of being a "Front Puppet" for the "Powers to Be" ..- just ...like....anyone would be - if they really WERE a "Front Puppet" and had some serious ...hmmmm.. reasons ..... to "Divert"- get the REAL "Story" sidetracked, (i think he is under some BAD BAD people´s thumbscrews) I remember him , freaking out in a BAD way - to a jounalist , on RT TeeWee channel - to the point , were he was SCREAMING : DO you BELIVE that 9-11 was an Inside Job ??? ( as he´s LAST card , to get trhe inteviewer to STOP , asking REAL questions - AS IF.... its somehow predicitive , of BAD journalism , to NOT believe the NIST-Report ! ... Now ...THAT was telling .. and for ME , atleast , a SHURE sign , of Michio Kaku , being , between a stone and a hard place !!! - now - for the nontalents , who will , in REFLEX, call ME a Stupid , Scientisthater , and so on - ..know that i LOVE , dudes like Richard Feynman, David Deutch, David Bohm, Bostrøm,Cambell and his Big Toe , Einstein, Bohr, and people like them - who never would go on ANY lecture circuit, to "Play there Funnyman Ridicule tinfoilhat Tours" That generates the BIG money - on the "Lecture (ridicule) Circuit" , again - isnt it FUNNY , how these "Pinnacles of human Knowledge, Consensus Stars" like DeGrasso, Krauss, and Kaku, Stick" - allways make a BIG point out of telling , that the reason , these "TinfoilHats" .. "LIES to COMMON people" - is for monetary gain !!?? - now - lets see - hmmm... who makes MOST money (on Books, AND Lectures !)!??? The "Clever Consensus Popes of Science TeeWee" - or , the dude , or duderine , who had a HIGLY strange interaction, with , what he , or she , believes , was from another World (dimension , or starsystem - the diffence is the same same , but different) I HATE shameless doublestandards, and i hate Smartass bullies, who believe they know more than ANYBODY else !

[@ninetyandthree]

jim geary I thought I was the only one who thought Tyson is an overbearing obnoxious fuck! Ty, Tyvm for sayn it!

[@petersage5157]

For me, Neil deGrasse Tyson's biggest shortfall is pushing back from the edge of what we don't know (usually invoking the G-suit at the end of Raiders of the Lost Ark with "we've got top people working on it" and not dropping any names), yet criticizing his own hero Newton for stepping back from that same edge in his time. I want to hear about what people think we might discover when Neil is taking his little ice fishing trip to Europa.

[@Charles-Anthony]

Jim, what's wrong with Krauss? He's a great speaker imho.

[@Tadesan]

jim geary Jim Al khalili is verbose too.

[@bronson8x993]

Mesmerizing lecture. Thank you!

[@fjaresj]

Awesome, awesome!!! So many concepts condensed in a very simple way.

[@staninjapan07]

What a great presenter / teacher. That was fascinating for me, a non-technical viewer.

[@raja.residence]

load of bollocks if you ask me..

[@elizabethfletcher1487]

After 50 years of trying to understand planks constant, I get a clear picture in a 30 second, or less, description from this guy. LOL! How did all those teachers I had fail to explain it? I think they did not understand it. You cannot explain what you do not understand. Anyway, thank you very much for the clarity. It illuminated so much of what I could not understand about light. He even got me close to understanding, I think, that the space-time “grid” around matter is bent by the gravity created by the matter, not that the warped grid IS gravity. The warped grid picture just shows how things entering the warped field behave around matter. Hence the search for the “gravity” particle becomes logical. I have a degree in Radiation and Nuclear Technology so it isn’t like I did not have the background to understand these concepts with more learning. Oh, and this guy was right. Hig’s Boson found! Gravity waves detected! My first intro to a theoretical physicist was at OSU. He decided to teach Optics and Relative Physics to people who did not yet have Calculus. What a slog that was. 4 of us passed and that was only because he weighted the final heavily towards optics. But what stood out about him was his delight in showing us working models that described basic physical concepts. He would get snagged by them and repeat them over and over again until he heard the tittering begin. He finally admitted that although, as a theoretical physicist, he knew these concepts worked because the mathematics said they would, he still found it astounding to observe them actually functioning. Another time he was into the fifth blackboard when he stopped, chalk poised, turned slowly and knocked us all down with “ it is beginning to appear that space is granular, like sugar.” Whereupon he turned back to the chalkboard and continued the equation he was showing us. I loved that guy!

[@SolidSiren]

I'm surprised he clarified anything for you here. He is not going into depth and detail that I'd expect necessary to clarify for someone already possessing a physics degree.

[@3glitch9]

Gravity created by the matter? Sort of like a barycenters relationship to orbitals? Wouldn't that be magnetism? Or shall I say, couldn't it be also possible to use the word magnetism to also describe it? Even if it supposedly isn't magnetism, playing around with the idea and replacing the word gravity with magnetism works in so many situations.

[@elizabethfletcher1487]

@@SolidSiren I agree with you entirely. My degree centered on being a radiation safety technician in the field. My job was to find and document the radiation hazards likely to be encountered during work by others, map out and set up barricades and/or tents and ventilation systems, lay out the dressing and respiratory rules to be observed, create a temporary work permit defining the rules, and observe and provide guidance during the work as well as keeping on top of emerging hazards. All I learned were the basics about electromagnetic radiation, enough to be able to understand how to provide advice for working in the varying hazards and which detection instruments to use for what and when. I stumbled over a physicist teaching chemistry so I learned a heck of lot about bonding as well, but that is about all I learned after high school physics. So not really a physics degree. This lecturer is lecturing to my level of ignorance.

[@elizabethfletcher1487]

@@3glitch9 As you can tell by my writing, I do not yet understand gravity. In the same manner that looking at the old drawing of electrons orbiting at different levels around a nucleus works to get most people by, I have used magnetism as a pretty good cartoon picture in my mind to deal with gravity, whatever the heck that is. The most I understand at this point is that that damned warped grid describes NOTHING more than how objects behave in a gravity "field?". Chicken or the egg? Gravity and matter? Gravity or matter? Gravity then matter? Matter then gravity? Something else not yet discovered? I am having enough trouble wrapping my head around how anything could be so dense it could suck parts of galaxies down a well and NOT be spitting a product out the other end...somewhere (somewhen, like, say, the point where the, or should I say, a big bang started. Or does the thing in the bottom of a black hole self-destruct at some point in time of maturity that has not yet been reached (or observed yet)...jeez, I am going to die of old age before the solution to the mysteries will be revealed. It is like reading an incredibly captivating mystery novel all the while knowing full well you will never know how it ends.

[@3glitch9]

@@elizabethfletcher1487 I think you would like Dan Winters. He's figured it out. Or he's definitely figured out something. And it's mind blowing. Perfectly fits in with everything. I came across his work in doing my own research into it. Phase Conjugate Fractality: HOW Gravity is CAUSED "Golden Ratio / Conjugation / Fractality CAUSE Both Gravity and Mass- because only they permit charge to be efficiently (and in the case of gravity- IMPLOSIVELY) ..COMPRESSED!" If I try to share links my comment will be deleted, so I am going to spell it out in hopes it doesn't get deleted. Replace words in caps with appropriate characters wwwDOTfractalfieldDOTcomBACKSLASHconjugategravityBACKSLASH

[@ptolemyauletesxii8642]

I also enjoy his work as a dinosaur hunter and great warrior. It's good to see he finally found his way out the the Lost Valley.

[@justaguy2742]

Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

[@justaguy2742]

Ii

[@kishorchatterjee603]

@@justaguy2742b

[@fractalnomics]

21:22 FT; 36:54 i ; 37:43 expo real; 39:45 expo i; 41:50 sinusoidal wave; 43:53 light, no scale; 45:12 everything a wave;49:07 equipartition, 58:23 unitarity QM; 59:45 QM; 1:11:53 equation;

[@syedmohdjaved]

Thanks sir Regards from AMU, Aligarh, India

[@glennet9613]

The first ten minutes is promotion but when you get to the lecture it is excellent, he explains the things I already knew in a different and insightful way so I understand them a lot better.

[@robertturley5046]

Best math lecture I’ve ever seen! You’re an incredible teacher, thank you for sharing ✌️🙏🌌

[@sas6561]

So true ... but get the continual coughing idiot and germ spreader in the audience OUT OF THE LECTURE HALL!!!

[@TheLivirus]

Math lectures without math are fantastic indeed!

[@kimmiet39]

Extraordinary presentation, thank you so much! ♡♡♡

[@geofthompson3844]

Finally, an explanation of how light can be both a partical and a wave that made sense. This lecture seemed so laid back and almost disorganised in style, but out of the vagueness would come clarity. Woodwards work should be more recognised too. Brilliant 👏 👏 👏

[@schmetterling4477]

That's cool, man, except that light is neither a particle nor a wave. It's a quantum field.

[@triaxon3791]

Shockingly Beautiful and Shockingly Simple. I learned so much from this presentation, thought I can't really put my finger on it. 😀

[@maciejrogozinski3855]

im 30 now and full of regreds...if i had a teacher like this guy 15 year ago...my future would be much brighter...

[@ahmedennajari5392]

Maciej Rogozinski it s never late

[@Hr1s7i]

Bro you have plenty of time. People start new careers at the age of 50 and even later. "It's time for a change of pace" and they go and take up a new challenge/job/whatever. If you start putting yourself out of the loop this early, I assume plenty of people were trying to drag you down in the past. Forget that noise, find a rock you want to break and start chipping away from it. Worked for millions of people, it'll work for you as well.

[@jessiehermit9503]

Maciej Rogozinski So learn it yourself.

[@MARKCREEKWATER1]

Absolutely !! He's for sure a "gentleman and a scholar."

[@gerardjones7881]

Maciej Rogozinski Become the teacher you crave.

[@3000ararat]

Thank you for this great job

[@STArwarmer]

I am always awarded by a old the most excellent and challenging lectures I have heard echoing out this hall. The hall and the

[@sekoivu]

That was deep talk, and spoken in clear language. Very interesting. And thanks for putting out some real math in public talk like this.

[@hiufuxthevideographer9877]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/goi8h3ltqtiLi9U

[@kaypo1212]

I wish he went into more detail about the famous split experiment. How can a particle act like a wave? How can one particle exist in multiple places and yet only appear in one? Theories go to say that when we observe these particles we can change the outcome of the experiment and therefore change our reality. Really want to know his thoughts on this, as its my favorite experiment. Do we have any control on our reality??

[@MARKCREEKWATER1]

Get a copy of BEFORE THE BIG BANG (1997, 2001) by Ernest Sternglass, available from Amazon. In this book, Sternglass "busts" the so-called "double-slit experiment" ----- saying that the electron has an energy field large enough to, indeed, go through both slits at the same time. He says that the experiment doesn't work if the slits are too far apart, where "too far" is a very short distance --- I can't remember exactly how much. The textbooks don't mention that little fact !!

[@naimulhaq9626]

Most physicists have a confused view of 'observer's role', Turok gives the best insight into that role, simultaneity vanishes.

[@TheDavidlloydjones]

Brandon, I think the problem is that your very sensible "How can a particle act like a wave?" is a non-question. There aren't any particles acting like waves. There is a reality that seems wavy to us some ways and particulate to us other ways. We have a very very usable grasp of these views, usable enough to build an industrial civilization on, but we know it's wrong. Moving right along, it's not at all clear what your next sensible question maens, either. What do you mean by "places"? I'm sure we can agree on a meaning of "place" that makes sense enough if we're talking about bus stops, or houses, or even theoretical points on theoretical lines. We know, however, that we don't know what "place" might mean for an electron. Electrons come in clouds now. We really are in a transitional situation now, it seems to me -- or at least we would be if there were any clear vision of where we're going. There isn't. What there is is a very usable hack at The Whole Thing combined with a lot of very sophisticated demonstrations that it isn't really whole. Nor a thing. Nor, quite possibly, a "the." Ain't it fun!

[@vsiegel]

Naimul Haq - Yes, but "simultaneity vanishes" is one of the most mind bending concepts, I think. It means, for example, we can not start watching the video at the same time. Because the moment just fundamentally does not exist. Thinking that actually feels like it is physically bending my mind!

[@tuck-brainwks-eutent-hidva1098]

@@TheDavidlloydjones Amen and Amen!

[@deeneyugn4824]

Sometimes a little imaginary will help you see the universe. Thanks you for sharing your knowledge and explained it in a simple terms.

[@ephrosse]

absolutely fascinating and beautifully delivered lecture! i wish our children were taught in schools this way. they all would've come out brimming with scientific curiosity and love for the universe we live in

[@SolidSiren]

I agree. Teachers should teach both bottom up AND give top down overviews such as this so students have *context*!

[@periklisspanos7185]

But we don’t see nothing how they know

[@michaelmauzy2909]

That was probably one of the very best and enlightening lectures in my lifetime.Hail Turoc

[@afterthesmash]

1:04:00 I've heard it said (more than once) that if you are introduced to Maxwell's equations in the right way, that when the grand moment finally arrives where c practically leaps off the chalkboard is the most astounding moment of an entire undergraduate physics degree. And finally Turok underlines why: speeds aren't supposed to come out of this kind of formula in any way, shape, or form. Well done in making this explicit.

[@scottymills9739]

I just took a very restful nap listening to your voice and dreamed of my own version of how the unverise began. Thank you Neil. But I do listen to you regularly.

[@crazysox305]

Hardly know anything about math or physics but here I am. That’s when you know the lecture is good 😌

[@robinhodson9890]

What isn't known, is much more fascinating than the relatively little physicists know. All that we really know, is that we don't (currently) know much. Furthermore, the more knowledge in general that is uncovered, a greater number of unanswered questions arise: Curiosity and enquiry; theory and observation.

[@newoneinblack]

This is also when you realize you've been duped by a paid charlatan...

[@sujitbagchi5474]

@@robinhodson9890 of

[@windjam2739]

Just watched this video again after a year. What a presentation this is! Thanks again.

[@andrew3524]

It’s amazing how an hour listening to this guy made everything I couldn’t understand during my entire middle and high school years make complete sense. A major flaw in our education system is teachers teach without explaining why. It’s just the way it is because that’s what they were taught. This guy has such a fundamental understanding that he can bring the ideas down to that fundamental point and explain outwards.

[@comdrive3865]

teachers are being paid to teach, they're not really doing it out of kindness. They're also underpaid for the stress that they take on. Most teachers let the stress get the better of them teaching. Source: I've not had many shit teachers but I have shit parents

[@lepidoptera9337]

You would not have understood the "why" in middle school. You can hardly remember the "what". ;-)

[@comdrive3865]

@@lepidoptera9337 then explain it to him, or you're being part of the problem and are no better.

[@lepidoptera9337]

@@comdrive3865 I can't explain relativity to a person who doesn't have the intellectual curiosity to learn about it himself. It's not something one can understand on the internet. In university it's a two semester course, one for special, the second for general relativity.

[@comdrive3865]

@@lepidoptera9337 If you can't explain it simply then you don't understand it. Don't do this nasty this habit of commenting about "simple shit" and don't quit your day job then.

[@chandramoulisarkar2935]

“Mathematics is the crystallization of logic”

[@RockBrentwood]

He had the notches misaligned, like someone buttoning up a shirt one-off. It should be "Mathematics is *applied* logic and science is *applied* mathematics."

[@bennymarshall1320]

Goedel may disagree...!

[@ResurrectingJiriki]

@@RockBrentwood and that, in a nutshell, is exactly how they got to the bs he's talking about. As in, nothing to do with reality but all with fairytales and junk science.

[@gammaraygem]

"Logic is the greatest enemy of Truth." Sri Aurobindo. Thoughts and Aphorisms.

[@chandramoulisarkar2935]

@@gammaraygem without logic you can't even reach to that conclusion/aphorism

[@matonmongo]

Thx, and what a clear and gracious man.

[@jaytravis2487]

Intro was great!! Looked like there was a better flying about 5 cm off screen holding the que cards! S7ch a creativity! Yes, so awesome!

[@FariborzGhavamian]

amazing lecture. very understandable for a non-physicist.

[@aubreydebliquy8051]

This is perhaps the most important reflection I have seen in recent times.. The stone the builders rejected has become the cornerstone. kzbin.info/www/bejne/pXebdpKvl7dgjpI

[@larryfromqueens]

@@aubreydebliquy8051 9⁹99999988⁹999999999⁹⁹⁹9999999⁹⁹99999⁹998999 89th⁹9⁹984-9711 99 99th 99898999998 984-9711 998 984-9711 8999999999999999 984-9711 89th 98 I 9⁹99⁹999999⁹99999 984-9711 9999999999⁹⁹999999 I 99999⁹⁹9⁹9⁹⁹984-9711 999999⁹946-5733

[@pereraddison932]

@@larryfromqueens ... Them prime-num-buzz shawennuff mathematically googleplexed mahmind a lil bit-!!!

[@kamion53]

most amazing is that the prediction about getting pictures of blackholes and seeing gravitywaves came true in the time he predicted it.

[@chocolatecityoutlaw6258]

Thank you sir for your time and patience with helping me to understand the importance, complexities, and simplicity of scales! It's incredible the clarity of your explanations and your conveyance of logic which is simply physics.

[@natepeace1737]

KZbin knows the power of this as an unintentional ASMR. You will sleep well listening to this man.

[@simonaelena5438]

If only our math teachers explained the beauty of the i concept and how that explains so much in this universe! Thank you for sharing this incredible lecture!

[@miguelquazar883]

My last math teacher in HS would copy her txt book on the black board and then snack on Reese's peanut butter cups and do the crossword puzzle in the daily newspaper. She would get angry if you didnt understand what she didn't teach. Since then I have had to teach myself and have gotten into types of Math I was always intimidated by and do use in life. It is addicting when you understand. I found out on my own that everything is mathematical. Things also are much simpler than they seem. This applies to everything. Everything is simple. There is no need to panic.

[@miguelquazar883]

My last math teacher in HS would copy her txt book on the black board and then snack on Reese's peanut butter cups and do the crossword puzzle in the daily newspaper. She would get angry if you didnt understand what she didn't teach. Since then I have had to teach myself and have gotten into types of Math I was always intimidated by and do use in life. It is addicting when you understand. I found out on my own that everything is mathematical. Things also are much simpler than they seem. This applies to everything. Everything is simple. There is no need to panic.

[@BraveCat9927]

@@miguelquazar883 I feel like its gotta be intentionally done in school now. Drive us all away from math make it seem like the worst subject so we never figure things out and better our universal understanding. They gotta keep us down in the web of lies and smoke

[@exodus_from_babylon]

Yep you can prove anything you want then. I bet Ferguson uses that logic when he's building his ludicrous models

[@ecourtonlineworld5747]

Polymersuper conductor and graphane. Superconductor can generate quantum high-speed radiation or sensation may Enable us sense the changes in. In blackhole . professor is the pioneer and we whole world are planner to use the quantum mechanic in quantum.computing or sensing changes in unseen spectrum of dark energy

[@BikashDas-lj7il]

"The Greatest Truth is Simplest"

[@markriva4259]

What then, does this-that imply?

[@earllawson5223]

fantastic talk, thanks!

[@pereraddison932]

@@markriva4259 ... simply put, this-that, means... like, this n that, n them, n those, n they... I know, because, I'm an honest man, I tell lies... n, That's the truth, really-!!!

[@pereraddison932]

... okay-now, &, awe-righty-then... The "Plonked-Length" is the dissed-ants X-i$-ting between the top of any give'n'taken bottle, from its' top, or lip, aend, its' bottom.

[@dragonslayerslayerdragon5077]

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler." ~Albert Einstein People love to focus on the first part but neglect the ending. E=mc² wasn't beautiful in its simplicity but in its marketing genius as a familiar expression of F=ma which his predecessors could be at peace with. In practice, the equation blows up to be less simple but more utilitous.

[@hannslunninger416]

Unfortunately, I don't understand the image at about 19:20 - if I take him literally, those are density fluctuations vs. scaling. Does that mean an arbitrary point around which you have meters, 100 meters, 10 to the power of 10, etc.? meters? Thanks for your answers!

[@1ucasvb]

I've never seen that equation for all known-physics before. I understand it's the wavefunction's propagator as a path-integral action integral of all the known field interactions, but I'd like to read more about that particular format.

[@1ucasvb]

+shomolya I know what a path integral over the action is. I'm just not familiar with someone putting it all together like that. I'm also confused about what the V "Lagrange" term is supposed to be, thrown in there.

[@1ucasvb]

I know what the Lagrangian is. The thing is that each term in the integral represents a fundamental interaction, but then there's a "generic" V term that's not attached to anything. So as you said, it does feel like an extra, general "fudge factor" to include. This is one of the reasons why I wanted to read more about where this equation came from. There's also the issue that this is supposed to be the propagator, not the wavefunction itself, but I digress.

[@Asdrubale88]

+shomolya Also. Did Feynman invent integration? Is it in relation with his "summing-over" of a set of events to describe experiments using probability calculus?

[@1ucasvb]

+Matteo Romellini That integral refers to the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics, which is due to Feynman. Basically, it's an integral over all possible "paths" a system could conceivably take between two initial conditions and times. This integral in that equation is actually the propagator of a quantum system. It describes how the probability of future states evolve based on the current state.

[@Asdrubale88]

shomolya Are you referring to the "Vacuum catastrophe" and the "Re-normalization procedure"?

[@Yoursorami]

I personally thank the universe for producing an entity like Neil. As well as being super intelligent in his field, his ability to convey incredibly complex ideas in a clear way is a fantastic ability. Many concepts I struggled with but I was glued for the entire lecture.

[@cynthiabinder3730]

Agree

[@LHoover]

Ok Neil Turok (dino-fighter?), if the 3rd Half is not the multi-verse input of chaos in probabilites, but a cyclical representation. Would it be a resonance of past or formation of future modes of perception/quantum-state. Or, Is, a function of vacuum interaction and/or stability?¿

[@bogdanflorin8927]

I was looking for this video for such a long time. I had one of my fastest sleep in my life with this. Absolutely excelent video

[@stephenfiore9960]

The only reason you went to sleep faster is because time “shrunk” (was shorter). Your getting closer to a black hole. Space time curvature

[@bogdanflorin8927]

@@stephenfiore9960 hahahhahaha. I understood that. As long as I'm just bordering the accretion disc, I'll be👍, probably...

[@tensevo]

In my mind, the dark energy is not driving the universe, but it is a result of mass formation. As mass forms due to moving through time and the ripples in the higgs field, it leaves behind a void, which is the vacuum dark energy.

[@Vieriz]

Interesting take

[@torfla1415]

So your type of bigbang consists of nonmassive particle fields. Is that consistent as one approach a near singular state .

[@tensevo]

@@torfla1415 my understanding is that as non massive particles move through space, they have their mass attributed by higgs field. As this mass moves through space it experiences time. If it were still in space it would not experience mass or time. The mass leaves behind the vacuum it dark energy in it's wake.

[@PrashantKumar-zm3yq]

Thanks from India Tedx.i learnt alot from this platform❤️

[@richardgalea9884]

Great lecture....Thank you, much appreciated...

[@platovsky]

NEIL TUROK gracias por brindarnos una explicación tan simple de la complejidad del universo en 3xpansion 🌎 🗺 🌐

[@keesvanbloois6697]

This was by far the most interesting and easily understandable lecture I have seen in the last few months. Great! Now I just need something to make the underlying math as simple as this 😃

[@sas6561]

How did you like that continuous LOUD cough all throughout the talk? (that loud bang that kept randomly coming was a single harsh cough!)

[@keesvanbloois6697]

@@sas6561 I really didn’t hear that…

[@MrVaypour]

Thank you Mr Turok, for allowing me to fight Dinosaurs

[@voyeur62626]

he did a great job providing us non-mathers with the broad strokes we live for.

[@ThisTrainIsLost]

The geography under and around the Perimeter Institute is very beautiful. It is the perfect place to mull over whatever you have that needs to be mulled over.

[@LukeCleland]

8:30 for anyone that just wants to get to the lecture

[@soulscanner66]

8:46 actually

[@StarNumbers]

8:46 of the channel and speaker self-aggrandizement

[@glennet9613]

9.34 “so what do I mean by simplicity”

[@ChaineYTXF]

You sir are a gentleman and a scholar

[@pikiwiki]

you are the chosen one

[@sbklein]

Physics explains everything that physics is fitted to explain. Brilliant. Inferential gold.

[@VilleValpuri]

+stan klein is there anything physics isn't able to explain?

[@sbklein]

too many to list. Start with one. Consciousness (i.e., the experience of).

[@VilleValpuri]

Even human feelings are just neurons firing in the brain. We may have a lot of reasearch to do in this field, but there is no reason to think that we couldnt explain conscicousness. The fact that something is difficult to explain is very different from being impossible to explain.

[@sbklein]

I do not think you have a clear understanding of the issues: Sorry, but your exclusively biolerplate stipulations (e.g., promissory note materialism) strongly suggest this inference carries some weight. I am not interested in discussing these complexities on youtube -- so feel free to write me off as a big mouth know-nothing if that works for you.

[@VilleValpuri]

stan klein No worries, that is not my strategy. I'm always willing to have a rational discussion with anyone - even someone in youtube. I simply wanted to see if you are able to convince me to reconsider my view on this.

[@miguelhernandez72]

With regards to the moving trolley with two lasers. Does the relativistic analysis destroy the concept of causality between events? It seems to me that if an observer on the trolley views both light pulses hit at the same time, but an observer standing outside would view one hit before the other, then causal ordering is also relative. Is there ordering to interactions in the universe, or is ordering only relevant when we define a fixed frame of reference?

[@veerleswartebroekx6816]

No, causality still holds as long as nothing travels faster than the speed of light. The order of events may change as long as those events are independent of each other. Your reasoning makes total sense, but thanks to the speed limit causality cannot be broken at least not as per the theory of relativity as we know it.

[@richardpark3054]

Wow! Thanks! That was totally awesome! Just websurfing in my camper at night, after working on my empty lot a little less than 4 miles from SpaceX Boca Chica future spaceport. UPDATE: Still awesome, 1 year later! Thank you, Dr Turok!

[@Jason-gt2kx]

Great voice and ability to simplify complex ideas.

[@MR-nl8xr]

1:03:13-1:03:22 Correct me If I am wrong but nobody really thinks that if you catch up to a moving object, like the car in front of you on a freeway, its speed will start to decrease just from the simple fact you are catching up to it i.e. because the car in front of me is going 85 mph and my car behind it is going 70 mph, it will instantly decrease to 80 mph just because I sped up to 75 mph. I don't think that is what Newton said either; anyone have a link to him stating that?

[@swetsTV]

if you guys didn’t know: back in the 90’s when the video game “Turok” released, the studio had a launch-promotion where they were paying $10,000 to whoever got their name legally changed to ‘Turok’! There was obviously rules like if you changed your name you’d have to keep it for atleast 1 year, or if you had a child & named him Turok- you’d have to send in the birth certificate etc etc. don’t know if he was apart of this, would be cool though!

[@____uncompetative]

First name, not surname

[@gianni_schicchi]

@@____uncompetative omg lol 🤭

[@Jameslaingsmith1]

Love the audience gradually falling asleep, simplicity is apparently very difficult for the mind to absorb!

[@Monkeynumber99]

It's hard for the human mind to absorb because it's antithetical to reality

[@jollydove6314]

Thats probably because it was not simple

[@cosmotalk7227]

We should be spontaneously curious for such lectures being avilable for everyone, I am 12 years old now, and very thankful to see this, I was continously energetic by the whole lecture.

[@smwrbd]

He has a soothing voice

[@The.Kyle.Scott.]

@@cosmotalk7227 good for you. Keep up the enthusiasm and follow your passions bud

[@aloggins69]

I think some more understanding of the universe is definitely needed.

[@saf271828]

Prediction: "Within two years, we're going to see black holes, and within five years we're going to be able to see gravity waves." Reality: "That same year this presentation was given, LIGO detected gravity waves. Four years later, we finally have our first image of a black hole." I'd have to say his predictions were, while flipped around, nonetheless damn spot on.

[@gammaraygem]

both discoveries were never peer reviewed. (but hey, its "modern science" who gives a f)And will come, as has now the Cosmic microwave Background, (also not properly peer reviewed) into big trouble. Faulty instruments, faulty assumptions and very bad, (illegal in science) statistics.

[@ResurrectingJiriki]

So we look for black holes for like 100 years, and then boom, got one and the picture at one go? It's all theoretical physics and amounts to no more than mere fairytales. The universe is electric in nature, gravity is by product/effect. Black holes do not exist. *Insert quote by Mark Twain about being it very hard to explain to someone has been fooled here*

[@gazmasonik2411]

Light is sound.. The conclusion macro and micro one in one thousand is the wavelength and frequency of all wow:-o

[@gazmasonik2411]

Bit like the sloppy climate sciences. Invented lately and financial incentivised by grants that have a similar effect on political agendas A strategy to promote more of lie or Loss of funding? Price of truth in life of highest bidder land is lower than ever.

[@gazmasonik2411]

@QQminusS like Einstein did. Hardly common knowledge but it was the kind of thing you find out when curiosity and information collide. But it would be comforting to find science immune to market forces and standing on objective truth? Which is a highest bidder paradigm after all.. Look at the cash driven climate scientists The revelation of carbon being pollution. USED TO BE "LIFE ITSELF", is carbon somehow! Every one assuming someone knows about the important stuff. But all clueless on origin of life as ever.Same as medicine and physics Appearing you know more is inherent in universities now.This talk was something approaching Noble.. for a change

[@randall.chamberlain]

Fantastic lecture.

[@stevoofd]

1:01:01 I know the wave pattern is supposed to visualize the parameters of frequency, wavelength and amplitude, but ot just occured to me that in this visualization specifically it looks like a piece of plied metal wire being rotated like a roast, and the 6 zero points he points to all follow the line of the rotational axis. If I would be the one cranking the handle on the right hand side, it would be a cyclical motion of pushing the handle away from me when it’s going upwards from its horizontal baseline position, and towards me when it’s going downwards respective to its horizontal baseline. By further analogy, if the wave was traveling from left to right, it would have a left handed chirality. Is this just a trompe l’ouil that I’m looking too much into, or does it capture something fundamental about the nature of lightwaves? We always visualize waves as twodimensional strings elastically bouncing up and down creating the peaks and the troughs, but what if we imagine a wave as a rigid n-dimensional object that is rotating in the dimension perpendicular to its point of emission, and travelling in a straight line from its point of emission to its point of absorption? If there were such a thing as an antiphoton, would it have a right handed chirality instead? What are the implications for entropy and the arrow of time?

[@adurgh]

At the risk of sounding ungrateful for such superb presentation, I thought the trolley thought experiment presented at about 1:04:00 was terribly confusing and unclear.

[@ecourtonlineworld5747]

Feel the geometry and variation of relativity you see an exponential figure is a result or. Time individual no its variation that's time and. Strength increases the radius or decreases as a result the Maxwell theorem is a resultant. Pattern of. Product so. The quantum mechanicsm. Gives. More complex codes than the hexadecimal coding. Used in digital bulean algebra . the. Phase deferences of all functions makes complex figures which can be codes is quantum computing . but a thesis as told more you. Walk more you live long is the. Thing still to be realised from this equation

[@stink0soccer]

What an illuminating lecture!! Amazing how those crazy Canucks seem to be having a good old time up in the Great White North of Waterloo. Looking forward to the next brilliant lecture. THANK YOU!!