Here, Sahar Joakim briefly discusses a priori (knowledge) compared to a posteriori. For more, visit www.saharjoakim.net
Пікірлер: 6
@AttilaM-p6x3 ай бұрын
Thank you for your video.
@rogercarl39693 ай бұрын
A bit of a personal story regarding tabla rosa. My first conscious memories are simply that, memories about consciousness. I would fade in and out of consciousness but had no sensory experience. Everything was black. No experience of sight, sound, touch, smell, or taste. But I liked being in that conscious state and wanted to remain there. First was overcoming a fear about losing that conscious state when fading out but it always came back so got over that worry. The second thing was even though I knew this conscious state would come back I wanted to remain in it anyway, and did not want to fade out, just because this conscious state was where I was happy. (I image it was difficult for my parents to get me to sleep at night.) I had desires even before I knew of this world.
@shareef.almiqdad3 ай бұрын
Big fan, Dr. Joakim. If for a second we take for granted the four categories of analytic a priori, analytic a posteriori, synthetic a prior and synthetic a posterior, in which category would you put 7+5=12 and in which category would you like epistemological research to take big strides? If you can oblige us with your own opinion, notwithstanding a defense of that opinion and other philosophers’ opinions. (Thank you for the great content)
@saharjoakim3 ай бұрын
I enjoy how Kant explains math and his link to a priori judgements
@TragicEntertainment3 ай бұрын
Great video, good inspiration. Some of the stuff I've heard of, some of its new. Mentally stimulating. if I wanted you to read/review a book I wrote. Would you consider reading it and giving me feedback?
@saharjoakim3 ай бұрын
Sure! my email etc is listed on my website: saharjoakim.net