Lavistro discusses the Dragon Age Franchise and the Upcoming Dragon Age Vielguard. VetGamerBociefus's Channel for the Dragon Age Vielguard livestream: @VetGamerBoceifus01
Пікірлер: 26
@VxDAMAGExV_I4 ай бұрын
Bet Inquisition has more players after a year.
@UniqueBreakfastTaco4 ай бұрын
theyre more concerned with everything but making a good gaming experience.
@sofajockeyUK4 ай бұрын
Just as well the previews are glowing, so it looks like they did make a good gaming experience.
@UniqueBreakfastTaco4 ай бұрын
@@sofajockeyUK lol... Oh wait, you're serious...lemme laugh even harder... 🤣
@sofajockeyUK4 ай бұрын
@@UniqueBreakfastTaco You've not read/watched the previews then? Fair enough. More of a surprise for you when you play the game.
@UniqueBreakfastTaco4 ай бұрын
@@sofajockeyUK what's funny is you still think shill access media have any credibility. They removed most of the world states...which was the point of DA from day 1. Then they made the qunari look like trans, made the women look like trans, and made the men look like trans. Nah...I ain't playing this trash.
@Dragonage2ftw4 ай бұрын
Source?
@anonvoila48834 ай бұрын
Thank you for these finally world my friend. I'm over here paying my final respect to this once-lost fantasy. I refuse to play this final game cause its not bioware final game so yeah
@Dragonage2ftw4 ай бұрын
“Final game”?
@yumeyumi36794 ай бұрын
Like it or not, this is part of the lore.
@Dragonage2ftw4 ай бұрын
This!
@scotthotvedt90574 ай бұрын
I won't get the game. I feel as if I've been lied to with all the changes they've done. I Loved the history, although I really disliked the ghey lesb stuff they pushed In the game and it progressed too far. Now they sacrificed all that came before for a gimmick and turns out so many agree with me on this too. Sadly they don't care, so now neither do I.
@sonnenblumefrau20484 ай бұрын
You do know Zevran and Leliana were bisexual right? Everyone in 2 was bisexual as well. Inquisition had it along with gay and lesbian. You can CHOOSE to be straight, you know that right? Our first transgender character was Maevaris in 2012, then Krem in 2014. Patrick Weekes and David Gaider are supporters of the LGBT community. So really, you were never a fan to begin with.
@ImnotMattMurdock4 ай бұрын
@@sonnenblumefrau2048Thank God someone gets it. I commend you
@sofajockeyUK4 ай бұрын
If you disliked the gay and lesbian romances, the mistake you made was to do gay and lesbian flirting. You don't get those romances unless you instigate them. Tip for your next playthrough.
@Dragonage2ftw4 ай бұрын
I don’t think a lot of people agree with you…
@danielnolan88484 ай бұрын
@@sonnenblumefrau2048 Inquisition was pretty bad tho
@kuronoagone40994 ай бұрын
For me it is a super easy descicion. this game is going to be a Dragon Age only in name. This is going to be as much as a Dragon Age as Metal Gear Survive was a Metal Gear game. Whats the point of playing this coming all the way back from origins if they are not the same team telling the story?...It doesn't matter anymore, thats why they are so eager to drop everything their predecesors did. So, personaly, im not going to pay to see the story and characters I liked be disrespected like that.
@Dragonage2ftw4 ай бұрын
The people who wrote this wrote every other DA game… What are you talking about???
@PlanetaryPluto3 ай бұрын
3:35 Do you have ear holes? The first words out his mouth is "the chantry tells us". This was never established fact. Just the chantry's version. 16 minutes in and man's just waffling. Haven't said a single thing about the lore that has changed. Crazy
@lavistro843 ай бұрын
@@PlanetaryPluto 1:55 I tell you. Second seems every one else disagrees with you on my reflection of thought. But let's unpack it since you want to focus on chantry tells us: Yes "the chantry tells us" "it is the HUBRIS of man" this part is the chantry version but it's never not challenged. For example do you wish to explain Corypheus? You know one of the seven Magisters Sidereal? Or in Inquisition there's a codex of dwarves who saw 3 tall darkspawn who argue over failing to take the golden city? Shall I list more?
@PlanetaryPluto3 ай бұрын
@lavistro84 Explain to me how the lore was changed. You still haven't done that; which is impressive. At this point you're just saying things. How does the phrase "defy the (elven) gods" change the lore??? It's just a slogan of sorts anyway because we know they're not really Gods. They're just thought of as such. None of that has changed as far as I'm aware. So again, what was established and what was changed? Simple.
@lavistro843 ай бұрын
@PlanetaryPluto Explain Corypheus and the Magisters Sidereal. And then explain the Dwarven lore codex about darkspawn arguing about failing to take the golden city. Is it possible you won't because you don't know or do know and know it discredited your argument that it was "never proven" that "the hubris of man that brought the darkspawn" as attested by Corypheus and the dwarves own lore about it? Sounds more like you never played the game and just want to discredit a video that doesn't bend to corporate shills. You may insult me, because I didn't say what you like, and that is fine. But in doing so already lost the argument before I even commented. But a playtester has already allegedly came out and confirmed what I said. And before I make it to 10 minutes I summarize each 3 games and talk about the tresspasser dlc. And why I think Veilguard doesn't follow lore with the Creative Director even stating the previous lore doesn't matter. Which is what, as I said kept me intrigued with the franchise- the choices and story carry over and each three games main story was a continuing of the previous. So you didn't watch the video it seems.
@PlanetaryPluto3 ай бұрын
@lavistro84 "Sounds more like you never played the game and just want to discredit a video that doesn't blend to corporate shills." I haven't insulted you before. But I will now. You sound absolutely insane. I asked you a simple question. All you've done in the video is poorly communicate things. Also stop asking me to disprove your claims. The burden of proof is on you. The ancient elves were using blight magic long before corypheus. Corypheus getting tainted and corrupted with the blight doesn't disprove or change anything about the lore so I don't understand why you keep bringing it up. The blight existed before corypheus and the chantry's story is that the maker, which most likely doesn't exist, punished corypheus and his cohorts with the blight for their pride. THAT was NEVER confirmed. Since we now know Solas created the veil, do you consider that changed lore as well, seeing as the chantry claims the maker did?