Dragons or Dinosaurs? (2010) | Full History Documentary Movie |

[@peterkimball3323]

It's funny how people who believe in "science" will scoff so arrogantly at someone who believes the bible, and dragons. People since the dawn of time have spoken of dragons, believed in a creator. Every culture has dragon stories, Chinese zodiac is made up of 11 animals and 1 mythical creature? It's obvious it's 12 real creatures. Science constantly changes it's findings, I'm sure these things will come to light in time. Great doc!

[@nightforest1693]

Hey I just want to say I totally agree with you! If Dragons don’t exist then how come so many different Cultures/Countries that supposedly had absolutely no contact or knowledge of the other Country existing somehow all came up with stories/artwork featuring the same animal but although sometimes features different physical characteristics but all of these Dragons told in stories all have the same set of physical traits, even if everything else is different such as having scales, having the ability to breathe fire or some other poisonous substance, most of the Dragons mentioned have claws etc I know a lot of people say if Dragons really existed then where are their fossils and my theory is that the reason we don’t see Dragon fossils or even here stories about them anymore isn’t because they never existed it’s because they fled to far remote places in the world e.g islands, mountains ect and they reason they fled is due to humans, after all there are many stories of humans hunting and killing Dragons and if the stories are true then the Dragons probably knew their time was going to come to end on this Earth if they didn’t do something about it, and breathing fire wasn’t a threat anymore to us humans because we had developed amours and other protective gear when hunting them so they did the one thing they could do they fled. To islands/mountains untouched by humans. Who knows maybe they are still alive today or even if they are not I’m sure if one day humanity discovers those places we might find dragons fossils or dragons bodily remains. Finally I want to say that many people believe that Dragons could never exist because there’s no way that a four legged animal with two wings (I believe this type of dragon is called the European Dragon) could exist because there is no animals currently on this Earth that have four legs and wings but I don’t agree with that. There are many animals today that according to Science shouldn’t even exist or be able to do what they do, e.g science says that bumblebees shouldn’t be able to fly yet obviously they can fly and science also says that animals like the saber toothed deer, aardwolf shouldn’t exist but they obviously do. And there are weirder animals on this Earth that do exist also talking about supposed mythological animals, did you know that giant squids exist? Apparently we have found out they exist but we have only seen young/babies of the species we have yet to see a fully grown adult. But for many centuries the giant squid was said to nothing more than a legend but obviously they did exist that’s why we found them eventually. When it comes to Dragons I still do believe they are real and are out there somewhere away from humanity, after all it’s not every mountain/island/ocean/continent that us humans have discovered yet who’s to say that in some jungle on a undiscovered continent somewhere on earth that a drake (a flightless dragon) or a Wyvern (another type of dragon) isn’t living there still to this day? Sorry for the long comment but I just had to say what I had on my mind for a long time and also because I’m glad I see someone else who believes in the existence of dragons I also apologise for any spelling mistakes/poor English, I’m typing entire comment on my phone and it’s prone to autocorrect stuff so yeah that’s all I gotta say, to whoever reads this comment I wanna say thanks for doing so!

[@JPOG7TV]

seek mental help

[@cross8215]

The word dinosaur never was created until 1842 either. The closest thing to the word dinosaur was Dragon, which also meant no longer exists.

[@nightforest1693]

@@JPOG7TV lol 😂 imagine telling someone to seek mental help just because you don’t agree with their opinion/beliefs

[@andrewgroberg8844]

I don't disagree that man and dinosaur walked the earth together. Many of the presenters in this program are doing exactly what they are accusing scientists of doing. They are condescending and cherry picking how science is portrayed. Some of it is completely misconstrued. The book of Enoch says that the fallen angels created the nephilim. Maybe they created animals that were not genetically pure. That would explain why dinosaurs could not be on the arc.

[@geneticawakening2.016]

If it wasn’t for the word dinosaur and the lack of faith in the witnesses and evidence everyone would be much more aware of the facts of the dragons 🐉

[@Xenosaurian]

Classic! I love this documentary!

[@juanrambo7634]

Puff the Magic Dragon lived by the sea

[@DucDervin]

I have a relative named Pippy

[@mwmmidwestminiboats9543]

Why did the people that made this video decide to back a political party , I'm done watching thanks

[@Jonahch2v9]

It wasn't until I studied Anthropology that you find out how badly holed the evolutionary theory is. There's a clear divide between those researchers trying to get it right either way, and those with the attitude, "ok, we know evolution is true, we just need to prove it." Which validates ignoring a whole lot of evidence and issues.

[@Miguel_and_The_Microbes]

I was about to watch this but then the opening has people who think man and dinosaurs lived at the same time. Good grief religion is a clueless black hole.😅

[@davidyemm7910]

Thought this was going to link the fossil record with legend origins. Disappointed.

[@Dan-dj3cx]

Nope it's creationist propaganda 😂

[@dammitesme4547]

Ew creationism

[@joelhammack2792]

Wow these are the people worried about drag queens

[@Dan-dj3cx]

@@joelhammack2792 Don't worry in 10-15 years there will be Christian Drag Queens and they'll try to ruin drag like they're trying to do to rock n roll.

[@hahna77]

​@@joelhammack2792 the word "drag" comes from the word dragon. These dragon queens are of their father, the d****l.

[@jojofarley4511]

I think it is the other way around, humans were around during the age of dinosaurs and interacted with them.

[@Monjfrum]

There is "science," and there are theories. Science must be repeatable and is based on observations of facts.

[@nursekate6772]

Natives would not have reassembled bones. They would have used them as tools for everyday life.

[@vikingskuld]

Great video guysbjustbwanted tocsay thank you

[@charlesdaviddenler2064]

I really want this to be true. Question: If we continually uncover human remains and skeletons from the last 1000 years, why are we not finding any dinosaur skeletons of the same age? We find mammoth skeletons that show human interaction, spear points etc, but we have not found any dinosaur skeletons with similar human evidence. I do believe that dinosaurs and humans may have existed together, but the evidence needs to be much more concrete. If all of these dragons were killed by humans in legends, wouldn't they have kept the skeletons or heads? There is just no actual physical evidence to back this up. Dinosaur bones are found in a layer of stone that denotes a time period, but we have not found a single human bone in this same geological layer. If humans and dinosaurs existed together we would find skeletons of the same age, but there is no evidence outside of legends and art. I do believe in creation from a Biblical worldview, but this film does not offer enough evidence to actually prove that dinosaurs and humans lived together. Show a set of dinosaur and human bones of the same age and you have a solid argument.

[@nastynate2379]

With all of this technology , why can’t we find these LARGE CREATURES yet ?

[@manolitowyco9130]

Why dyna sour didn't ment in 12 zodiac sign? Why the monkeys are there and dragon. What are the first the 12 zodiac sign or dyna sour?

[@Balthazar3923]

I love how KZbin brought me this video. I wanna find more. With that being said I’ve always questioned the science I was taught. I mean really if evolution was a thing why has humans not evolved anymore. Even though many still live in extreme conditions.

[@sabrinaabela4712]

Why haven’t turtles or some fish evolved over millions of years?

[@commoncents4145]

great lecture. TY

[@DucDervin]

Giant lizards especially the Monitor Family could easily be a dragon, not flying around or fire but yes awful to be around

[@icyone]

a rose by any other name... This is a great docu. and i really appreciate all your hard work.

[@scottdean7613]

None of the descriptions mention 🪶🪶🪶 feathers.

[@TutankhamaruCapac]

You were expecting feathers on Sauropods? What are most of the dinosaurs you see here? Hardly any are Theropods. Pay attention

[@brookeclark2219]

I have always known in my heart that any evolution found was short term for survival. God created all creatures and your program tells me what I always felt in my heart. Well done and thank you.

[@shanehester5317]

please explain.

[@narancauk]

55:51 Lava came up from older layers (now on top),older that superficial layers

[@carnivorehypnotist]

It seems some people want to pick and choose what history they want to consider and thus believe.

[@cwhall5430]

God did not tell Noah to bring ALL the animals in 2 x 2. Read the Word again. There were far more animals in that HUGE Ark than 2x2,... God Bless and ALWAYS be a good berean.

[@TutankhamaruCapac]

Any intelligent man would bring baby animals that consume much less food, produce less waste, take up less space and will have more offspring instead of brining the hugest adults in the wild

[@Pierre-g1b]

This video is amazing.......we all of us are accountable to our Creator..,.He created everything,including the dinosaurs. I too believe dinosaurs were here right along with Adam and Eve. I had rather believe,know we have a Creator, snd and that His one and only son,Jesus Christ died for all of us, for our sins. Now we do have hope,we have a Savior. Thank you again for the truth.

[@shanehester5317]

ok there are no such thing as a dinosaur

[@banmanashah]

Dinosaurs didn’t exist. Dragons did.

[@Mastermirror89]

You people are legit stupid lmao. It's funny and sad at the same time.

[@kimduiveman4148]

The moment ... its an American documentary that says enough

[@Dolphins8200]

No dinos but giants

[@feelyoung79]

Do some research.. "man walked with dinosaurs proof" which you should be able to find on KZbin probably better than this one.. search through them and find a good one.. overwhelming evidence of dragons which is what they were called before being named "dinosaurs". There were definitely dragons..

[@TutankhamaruCapac]

Then what do we do with all the images of living dinosaurs produced by cultures all over the world? Some of the creature descriptions are even consistent and continue to be described consistently similar in the Congo by those who claim to see these creatures like Kongamato and Mokele-M'bembe.

[@hahna77]

There were both. They have used giant human bones to create "dinosaur" fossils though.

[@hahna77]

@@TutankhamaruCapac there aren't thousands of dinosaur species like they claim, only a handful, like the Dragon, Teradactyl & Stegasaurus, as well as various giant sea creatures. These are the ones you see on cave drawings around the world. Science mixes a lot of lies with truth to confuse the masses & to lead them astray.

[@M4x77]

Kiwanis??

[@narancauk]

Species do not die out on 1 2 3 now

[@michaelransom5841]

OMG.. for real... well that's a strawman if I ever heard one... @14:30, he tries to claim that Carl Sagans argument in "dragons of Eden" was that "we evolved from reptiles so part of our brain is a sort of leftover of when we lived in the age of the reptiles and so dragon legends are really, if you like, inherited memories... "..... WTF.. where did you pull that nugget out of?? First up, Sagan was a physicist, not a biologist or "evolutionist" (not a scientific field, that term literally just describes anyone who takes the theory of evolution to be true), and when he wrote The Dragons of Eden, he went way out of his lane to speculate on the evolution of human intelligence. The title "The Dragons of Eden" is borrowed from the notion that man's early struggle for survival in the face of predators, and in particular a fear of reptiles, may have led to cultural beliefs and myths about dragons. This is particularly true of snakes... in multiple experiments, time and time again it has been demonstrated that we have evolved to be exceptionally good at detecting snakes in our environment. This is called the snake detection hypothesis, to quote Wikipedia, "the snake detection hypothesis, suggests that snakes have contributed to the evolution of primates' visual system. According to the theory, predatory pressure from snakes has selected individuals who are better able to recognize them, improving their survival chances and therefore transferring such skill to their offspring. From this point of view, snakes were responsible for the modification and expansion of primate visual systems which made vision the most developed sensory interface with the external environment for modern primates." There is a literal mountain of evidence in support of this postulate with double blind controlled studies showing we can detect the image of a snake through a blurring filter far faster than we can detect images of other objects and animals. The oddly distorted prospective taken here stems from the now defunct triune brain theory, where it was believed that the human brain evolved layer by layer. the triune brain hypothesis is no longer espoused by neuroscientists as it has been proven to be overly simplified, although there is still some overlap with the contemporary understanding of the brain. the idea was that the deepest portion, responsible for functions like movement and breathing as well as instincts like hunger, survival, and mating, originated from our ancient reptilian ancestors. The second layer, the limbic system, controls emotional responses and arose in more recent mammalian ancestors. The third and final layer, the cerebral cortex, allows for language and reasoning and only arose in humans. Sagan was a proponent of this hypothesis, and thus he often attributed the emotion of fear to the "reptilian brain"... this does not mean that "dragons were an ancestral memory from the age of reptiles" rather, Sagan's view was more about how our brain's evolutionary history influences our psychological responses and perceptions. He suggested that our primal fears, like the fear of snakes or large predators, could be rooted in this ancient 'reptilian brain.' This idea aligns with the broader concept of evolutionary psychology, which posits that many human behaviors and responses have evolved to solve problems of survival and reproduction. However, this is a far cry from claiming that dragons are a direct ancestral memory. Sagan never implied that our ancestors literally encountered dragons or that these creatures are a literal memory passed down through generations. Instead, he explored the idea that our brains, shaped by evolutionary pressures including the need to avoid predators, might be predisposed to imagine fearsome creatures like dragons. This aligns more with the concept of an archetype, a sort of collective unconsciousness described by Carl Jung, rather than a literal ancestral memory. In essence, Sagan's work in 'The Dragons of Eden' explores the fascinating interplay between our evolutionary past and our cultural myths, but it doesn't claim that myths like dragons are direct memories of our reptilian ancestors. It's more about understanding the roots of our fears and imaginations in the context of our evolutionary history. But what else should i expect from a creationist documentary... If you can't win with fact, win with lies, right?

[@N8VSniperwolf]

Carl Sagan was an idiot. We get it, you love the guy.

[@ReneeHorth]

Finally the truth ! Special Thank You to these researchers, and Scientists who are working toward truth !!

[@4iMRyan]

Or, DragOsaurs!!!

[@DucDervin]

Like that one

[@MonaTellstrom-wf1pc]

I was so touched that you scientists finally realize that GOD IS REAL! And that he is our creator and created everything we see.😅❤

[@devilsadvocate1436]

Don't praise them. They deserve none for being so slow to understand God's will.

[@Widdowson2020]

Remember to capitalize Science when referring the modern religion of that name, as opposed to science, which is supposed to be a empirical method of observing and interpreting the physical world. In our dystopian world they are no longer compatible. Put simply, if you deny a fact simply because it disproves your worldview, instead of seeking, and creating a new model(or restoring an old) then you are no linger an objective “scientist.” You are nothing more than a believer, a cultist even.

[@jojofarley4511]

But not 6000 yrs ago, the 65 + million yrs mark..if the dating is wrong for fossils it is for the HUMANOID remains foud as well. We overlapped

[@narancauk]

44:00 64 000 000 000 years ago we had not only Noah flood but lot of active volcanos Tsunamis and earthquakes

[@Kishla-f4o]

Reptiles dinosaur and dragons are all reptiles

[@Snoopy16mh]

And so are birds reptiles.

[@jojofarley4511]

OR..God created dinos but decided they were not quite what he had in mind, wiped them out and we, hominids, were the newer version of his plan.

[@flashdale]

Our father did not create evil creatures that was the god of the old testament. Our father does not tempt anyone to do evil and cant be tempted by evil. Mr mythos evidence that yhwh was a dragon.

[@SuperJimmyBennett]

1:22:40 Bran Hughes preaches a "works based" gospel which is wrong.. you dont "repent of your sins" thats a work. Repent means to change ones mind from unbelief to belief in what the Blood of Jesus did for you on the cross..1st Corinthians 15L1-4 KJV. Its not of works in this current church age.. that is to be in the tribulation and the Everlasting Gospel. 7 years..

[@teresawest5602]

How does this relate to dinosaurs and dragons

[@abcamylou]

How do we know if they had sharp teeth? Could some of these dinosaurs have cattle teeth

[@teresawest5602]

Fossils found that's how we know the kind of teeth they had, ah dahhhh

[@KV-1Enjoyer]

No. Just no

[@Xenosaurian]

Huh?

[@shanehester5317]

they are not dinosaurs they are clearly dragons looking at the bones.ok before the flood and what science says is that before the flood or the time they say the dinos lived we know the oxygen levels were much higher.after the flood because of different atmospheric pressure droped over time and made it very hard for dino species to continue to survive.

[@narancauk]

49:50 Nobody or nothing can accelerate nuclear decay.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Only GOD .Maybe.

[@aaabbbbccc680]

Awsome

[@honeycat535]

its like creationists were vocal in the 90s and all are quiet now. how old is this video?

[@Xenosaurian]

What are you talking about?

[@jaredharris1940]

Np man that have ever lived set eyes on a dinosaur of any kind!

[@Monjfrum]

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up... lol..

[@michaelransom5841]

Well technically... birds.... lol.. but I get you're point.. so no man that has ever lived has set eyes on a non-avian dinosaur of any kind... doesn't have quite the same ring though... lol.

[@ericvondell5157]

Avialae Are Maniraptorae! (Dinosaurs!)~ and, I'm, Reasonably certain, that I've seen, THESE, Dinosaurs! (Swats at the Velmong playing with the controls 😸🤪🤣) So, unless, we rename "Dinosauria" to: "Drakelsia", as has been Proposed! THEN, Dinosaurs are "Dragons "!🤪

[@newsolo777-r6b]

You can't say that. You don't know what others have or have not seen. You just don't believe that they have.

[@teresawest5602]

Where's your proof

[@xanadood1]

unscience

[@rustycann6887]

i can buy into that man and dinos shared the same time lines but i cant buy into that the world is only a few thousand years old if man and dinos shared the same time line it was because not all the dinos went extinct millions of years ago but they did live millions of years ago

[@shanehester5317]

wait are u saying there was such a thing as a dinosaur

[@grandma-e]

I think sometime we look from our limited human eyes. But, if there is a creator- I know there is but don’t want to assume you do, then what is age to someone who can organize matter? When I bake a cake, each of the different ingredients are at different stages and ages, but my cake is only an hour old. When Adam was created in the garden of Eden, how old was he on Sunday? According to the Bible? Well, one day old. Yet he was fully grown. What ever your conclusions are, it’s is fascinating all the same, that my minds ideas can connect with yours in an invisible space that directs energy and light so we can communicate. What a mystery and miracle

[@kyngpapi]

@@grandma-edeep

[@DucDervin]

Problem is that it was written in Egyptian and Behemoth means Water Buffalo. Same with Leviathan, Big Whale from Mediterranean

[@ianmonk6211]

King James Bible Dictionary > Strongs Numbers > H930 What it means in Egyptian is not what it means in Hebrew. A water buffalo does not fit the description on the bible. Look at the second meaning for the Hebrew word it fits the description. KING JAMES BIBLE DICTIONARY Home Introduction Dictionaries Help Hebrew - English Dictionary H930 - Behemoth Strong's No.:H930Hebrew:בְּהֵמוֹתTransliteration:bᵉhêmôwthPhonetic:be-hay-mohth'Word Origin:Bible Usage:Behemoth.Part of Speech:Noun MasculineStrongs Definition: In form a plural of {H929 } but really a singular of Egyptian derivation: a water {ox} that {is} the hippopotamus or Nile horse Brown Driver Biggs Definition: 1. perhaps an extinct dinosaur a. a Diplodocus or Brachiosaurus, exact meaning unknown ++++ Some translate as elephant or hippopotamus but from the description in Job 40:15-24, this is patently absurd. Bible References: Behemoth Job 40:15 Translation Occurrences: behemoth ( 1 ) Definitions are taken from Strong's Exhaustive Concordance by James Strong (S.T.D.) (LL.D.) 1890. King James Bible Dictionary SITEMAP Home Introduction Dictionaries Strongs Numbers Links LEGAL Help About Us Terms of Use Privacy Policy Copyright Notice OUR WEBSITES The Kings Bible King James Bible 1611 King James Bible Dictionary Websters Dictionary 1828 Textus Receptus Bibles Treasury of Scripture Knowledge   © Copyright 2022 MasonSoft Technology Ltd v4 (10.6.2023)

[@Xenosaurian]

That is simply false.

[@adamadams6740]

WTF,WTAF!!!!!

[@daniell1483]

To anybody who is not a science denier: give this video a pass.

[@jvonhousen3055]

Spotted the npc...

[@daniell1483]

@@jvonhousen3055 I believe in science, therefore I am an NPC? I think that says more about you than me.

[@fredclements6843]

There is one thing that these men are or didn’t include that some of the dinosaurs were corrupted by the fallen angels like a lot of things where so some probably could’ve breathed fire

[@tcray8599]

This video is insane made by people who take a revised translation of God's word and further reinterpret it to... Oh God these people give me a headache

[@jerald6023]

That's really confusing- so if you ARE a science denier, You SHOULD watch it... ? & why? So u can deny it,or learn that you shouldn't be denying it? Can't really tell what you think about the subject matter of the video presented, if you don't believe 900 mile long Dragons or 1,000mile long feathered Serpants existed, nothing personal, but you'd be wrong- ref: Roger Spurr's brilliant Mudfossile University on KZbin

[@Santhony177]

The gospel is an abomination lie. Why? Human sacrifice is pure wickedness and rejected by THE ALMIGHTY.

[@judyenders7301]

Much too religious