AI Detection Bypass: Uncovering the Only Method That Works! I Tried Them All!

In this video, I'm sharing with you my experience using different AI detection methods. I tested all of them and found the only one that really works!
Undetectable AI: link.andrewstapleton.com.au/6av
Originality.ai: link.andrewstapleton.com.au/0c5
▼ ▽ Sign up for my FREE newsletter
Join 19,000+ email subscribers receiving the free tools and academic tips directly from me:
andrewstapleton.com.au/newsle...
▶ Become a Master Academic Writer With AI using my course: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
▶ Use my Ultimate PhD Kickstart: 12 Point Success System for Aspiring PhDs to start your PhD strong: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
▶ My best KZbin advice curated into an an easy to follow course, Effortless Academia: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
▶ Applying for a PhD? Get my FREE PhD application resource pack to apply with confidence: www.subscribepage.com/freeapp...
▶ Learn what I wish I had known before starting my PhD in my ebook bundle: academiainsider.com/ebook-bun...
Undetectable AI: link.andrewstapleton.com.au/6av
Originality.ai: link.andrewstapleton.com.au/0c5
................................................
▼ ▽ TIMESTAMPS
0:00 - introduction
0:37 - initial scores
1:39 - synonyms
2:08 - tone
2:46 - paraphrasing tools
3:06 - manual paraphrasing
4:07 - resequencing
4:33 - details in prompts
5:21 - perplexity and bursting us
6:12 - undetectable.ai
7:46 - what you should really be doing
................................................
▼ ▽ RECOMMENDED ACADEMIC TOOLS AND SERVICES
AI TOOLS
▶ Best PhD Writing Tool - Writefull - link.andrewstapleton.com.au/w... (Get 10% off with my link)
▶ Chat with PDFs, Websites and more: HeyGPT - heygpt.lemonsqueezy.com/?aff=...
▶ Best Literature Search - Litmaps - app.litmaps.co (Get 10% off with code STAPLETON)
▶ Best Literature Review Writing Tool - Jenni.ai - jenni.ai/ (Get 20% off with code ANDY20)
▼ ▽ RECOMMENDED KZbin TOOLS AND SERVICES
▶ VidIQ - vidiq.com/drandy
▶ Camera - Canon EOS 650D amzn.to/3aDOog6
▶ On camera mic - amzn.to/3iMTzx0
▶ Webcam - amzn.to/43a8YyP
▶ Shotgun microphone - amzn.to/34gzcUX
▶ Portable recorder - amzn.to/3kUzF53
▶ Lighting - amzn.to/2YgbAfv
▼ ▽ Socials for shorts and reels
Instagram: / drandystapleton
TikTok: / drandystapleton

[@DrAndyStapleton]

For those wondering about a text that was written manually. I put my PhD thesis literature review into originality and got a 1% AI score. Make of that what you will!

[@imj.o.a5740]

Well done for your exploits of AI as an academic writing tool. I'm still waiting for that book you haven't written yet. i.e., "Completing your thesis in 6 months using AI tools". I bet once the first school summons the courage to adopt AI as an ordinary writing tool, your book will be handy for the ambitions. These tools are long overdue for research purposes and in aiding the physically challenged to contribute to the body of knowledge (imagine what text-to-speech could have done to the likes of Professor Stephen Hawking, of blessed memory). At the end of the day, it is original ideas that will triumph.

[@drdarien777]

Andy, I also wanted to thank you for you hard work. You have inspired me on many mornings when I just did not want to write. I watch a video and I want to work.

[@malwinaszmaglinska8120]

I actually scanned my proposal paragraphs -which were written before GPT existed - and it detected 98% AI... so I wouldn't say it's very accurate unfortunately.

[@evanext802]

Try and do it one or two paragraphs at a time. Originality has an issue with smaller bites.

[@aritraray2501]

But normally most people use Turnitin for plagiarism check. Now Turnitin can also detect AI. So can you make a video about Turnitin AI detection?

[@jamesbundi1468]

If paraphrased work is being detected as Ai then it means that AI detection tools are way too harsh now and they are punishing slightly original content as well

[@ObelixBarbatus]

Not only slightly original but completely original - and that is the purpose of AI, viz. to create sufficient uncertainty in us and to arrogate all thought and power to AI. Paranoid? You bet!

[@_boracic_atreus_23]

I would absolutely challenge any AI detection to my work. If detection tools are giving out "97% AI" for paraphrased work, then they're clearly not fit-for-purpose. I dont think any student or academic will be failed or rejected on the strength of AI detection tools alone. Plagiarism can be proved without any shadow of a doubt. It is easy to build a really strong, irrefutable case for plagiarism...the same cannot be said for AI generated content. There will always be room for doubt. Someone may just have a writing style that is very similar to a generative AI tool. There is no way to definitely prove that a piece of content has been generated by AI. Institutions would end up being sued if they start heavily penalizing people on the strength of detection tools.

[@DSScully]

People with Asperger’s Syndrome and Autism write very similar to AI. Since AI came out, I have been accused of being AI. I am not. Just Asperger’s Syndrome.

[@ayrtonarthur6162]

I was just failed on a assignment for Ai Detection.

[@SFgamer]

Agreed. AI is far from perfect. AI detection included.

[@mikhailhunter5277]

Especially in marketing, because AI has been loaded with a lot of marketing and blog writing styles. I have an about page article that was written for one of my websites that came back with parts of it. AI generated up yo 57.2%. So now I'm trying to figure out if it's just the writing style or if the writer used chat gpt. The detector I used is copyleaks, the best one I've found so far

[@PeterBrusso]

I'm new to the AI thing but I write books. I think you are right, the AI tools bomb everything out and perhaps if you pay for them, maybe they will give you a pass. I don't know but even with rewriting the AI stuff it detects it as 100% AI. Something is fishy here I think.

[@Steve-br7oc]

Going to start my own ai detector that just flags everything as 100% ai.

[@BibleBreakout]

Already exists - originality AI is broken. It’s to the point actual originality is detected as AI

[@5minutescience579]

it's sad......what if someone is a good writer? Good with grammar? And so on......these AI systems are giving false positives to convince people to buy their "premium version" or more "tokens".......make it make sense....... there is a war on AI software programs that don't have people's best interests at heart.....its all a game

[@ahmed4kp]

The only reliable Ai detection is Turnitin

[@Roonlovesfish3874]

Lol 😅

[@gjbquist]

There are already ones out there that detect 100% AI in their demo so you'll pay for their service. 🤣

[@joshuafoley4883]

So...2 things: 1) The percentage shows how confident the software is that the tested text was generated by AI; NOT the percentage of text that was generated by Ai. 2) I just ran a paragraph of my PhD thesis through it. I 100% made those lines of text because it is (literally) my original contribution to the field of IR. The results came back 50/50...First impression: This is a dangerous tool if professors think it is the end-all be all to detecting Ai...a lot of students might lose that battle just because the professor can't see my first point and into my case study (which proved to be very not accurate)

[@junglestar]

Exactly, these tools don't work. There is no way to detect 100% AI content, and we need to hold these software vendors to firm explanations of what they're tools. There is absolutely no way to detect these thing. LLMs work but using probability and other factors based on HUMAN written language. OpenAI is a closed system, even they couldn't create a tool that can tell 100% ai written content. These vendors are going to create a big issue for academia and professionals.

[@blkretrosamurai]

My thoughts exactly. There is no protection for actual original writings.

[@Itonyreyes]

This is exactly my point. It will lead to people who don't understand this nuance accusing others of creating articles using AI.

[@Prof_C]

Agree 100% NEVER USE THESE TOOLS.

[@desmonda.pringle1737]

I ran a section of a paper I did before the release of ChatGPT and it came back 50/50. I thought I was AI :)

[@michaelroussi7292]

I use AI for framework and direction/guidance in bullet points and then research each bullet point to write in my own language. This works. AI is your assistant to write not write on your behalf.

[@TheChamberRoomExperience]

I am wondering why this guy is typing in the percentages. I pasted a text that was AI-generated in this "detecter" and it came back with human. I did this more than once. I would not trust this. But if you use A I as a guide and then research yourself, it would be good.

[@terrynarvaiz9197]

I actually tested papers from 2015 in several AI detection bots and they were flagged as AI... I am in college so this has become very stressful for me to have my essays flagged when I know I wrote them without the help of AI.

[@slayer2608]

Same lol

[@leunca]

AI detectors like this are not accurate, different company produce different scores. The results of my test, all of my Google translate results were detected as AI even though I wrote the original text from scratch. Even when I wrote several paragraphs of nonsensical fictional stories. I tried to translate my thesis to English using Google translate, it was detected >90% AI, even though my thesis was made from scratch and was a super niche topic. My thesis was written in 2010, when AI didn't even exist. 🤣

[@kinghassan3122]

You are ai lol

[@Seek99_06]

I have an 100 point essay I have to turn in and I'm scared I'll get failed for it (my teacher has already failed 2 students for it due to the ai checker “turnitin”) bc I worked really hard on it, but I've put it through ai checkers and all come back saying it's 40+% ai. ☹️

[@kinghassan3122]

@@Seek99_06 Even using Grammarly considered to be ai by ai check websites

[@cryptolew8885]

Thank you for this. Excellent demonstration and guidance, especially for students. It's the lower end AI scores that at least alert me as an educator to check carefully for AI/plagiarism. Upon further investigation--typically I find more, and it is provable as plagiarism without a detection tool. I'm finding that some detectors are clearly better than others.

[@StatisticsSupreme]

Pls follow up this video with a broad range of original texts and original-AI-mixed texts and how those checkers perform there. Thx. Great work you are doing.

[@cashbuyer4221]

Chatgpt doesn’t write well enough for academic papers anyway. It’s great for providing a general structure that can be heavily edited and elaborated or for getting started just to build momentum.

[@_salvax_]

Andy, great video, as usual ! Many thanks. Please, note however, that most of these tools are not able to make a difference between text created by AI and text corrected by AI, and will give all of them a low human score. This particularly impacts non English native people that tend to use AI tools to correct their texts. (I know it by... personal experience !) Based on my own experience, UniCheck gives a very different score to text generated by AI and text corrected by AI, which could be because it is capable of making that difference.

[@SamuelWebster]

In this scenario, I think the best option is to ask for suggestions, not corrections. That's a better learning method anyway.

[@moahaimen]

thats what happening to me

[@tesladrew2608]

​@@SamuelWebster Not every one knows native English speakers

[@Thischangeisnottelling]

which one's AI score was higher? the AI generated one or the one corrected by AI?

[@_salvax_]

@@Thischangeisnottelling I ran several (non scientific) tests over the last weeks using different texts across almost 10 tools and found that openAI's AI text classifier and zeroGPT are the less ambiguous (which does not mean the more precise...). On the other end of the spectrum, UniCheck and Winston went wrong almost every time they were submitted a text corrected by AI

[@rubyg8749]

Thanks so much! I used your affiliate link. So pleased with their service.

[@donglasgow11111]

It appears from what is written here that, using Grammarly to correct errors in my writing, have turned it into potentially AI written. So, still going to use Grammarly just only for spelling and typos, and not their sentence suggestions.

[@tamtam9034]

The research was interesting and torough. I’m definitely subscribing.

[@emmanuelannan5992]

I typed in "how are you" into an AI detector and it says 100% AI. Right there I knew these detectors were actually fucked up. Their outcomes are based on how they feel about a particular sentence or phrase. 😅

[@maxwellhunter8255]

Or person. Lol.

[@lifegenius763]

My goodness 😂😂

[@GarnonEre]

Legend. Love your work man!

[@miladmzz]

I think the AI detection scene is a bit of a mess. I put my own text that I wrote 2 years ago in chat GPT AI detector and it told me it's 100% AI written

[@googm]

And you're right. These things DO NOT work. There currently is not a single known AI model or system that can produce better _quality_ in a task than an equivalently trained human. Image recognitition, writing, writing detection, etc. - more generally, perception, creativity, and reasoning. You see things like "our proposed AI system outperforms human readers by 3%" or whatever in a medical imaging study, which is impressive, but you have to contextualize it within a highly currated dataset that in no way captures all of the variability observed in the world. These models up to now always fail on adversarial examples, while humans do not. And so my point is, if humans cannot reliably detect AI-generated content (except maybe Noam Chomsky), there is no model in the world (looks nervously at Google) that can reliably do so either. And the reason ChatGPT is so disruptive, is because humans cannot reliably classify the content it generates. This video was an ad.

[@kabirkin6666]

so true 😢

[@misterchristopher8857]

Very helpful in navigating the AI vs authentic, human created content.

[@TQuantP]

I think it's actually fine to use AI to produce academic work. AI doesn't generate original ideas, it just implements them. Think of chat-GPT as a lab assistant or something. I have used it to generate the code needed to run my regressions nevertheless. Since I don't really like the way AI writes academic work I don't use it that much in the paper, but since in my field all experiments are statistical I use it heavily as an intern 😂

[@_salvax_]

for the last 40 years (at least) the academic world "relied" on enslaved research assistants to write articles that were signed by the dept director (and sometimes the research assistant was not even mentioned in the authors list), and this has never been a scandal... But now, all of a sudden, only because it is AI writing it, it is becoming a big problem. Where is the problem/scandal if you generate your data, you generate your analysis, you come to your own conclusions and after you provide your guidance to get chatGPT to contribute to or assist with the writing of the final paper...? I understand that we should define the boundaries of "contribute to" and "assist with" but for me, introducing AI in the flow of actions in research could be more an opportunity than a disaster. I agree with you --I don't see that having an AI copywriting support is an issue (as long as you, not the AI, went through the phases of the research)

[@BibleBreakout]

@@_salvax_exactly, these AI detection tools aren’t going to last long - especially if AI actually starts to mimic human writing

[@nuvotion-live]

Keep in mind it’s difficult to define what originality means, and that originality and creativity are emergent properties of intelligence. More powerful models will surely be capable of both, and I suspect that had you seen a glimpse into 2023 from the past you might have thought the results of LLMs were creative and original.

[@arrow2380]

​@@BibleBreakoutwhich will very very soon as AI follows an exponential growth curve

[@user-bs3dx5wg1e]

I condense about half of the content in my own words, which often leads to favorable grading from my professor. This approach saves time on reading and researching. While I recognize that it's primarily the professor's responsibility, the industry heavily relies on AI for various tasks such as policy writing, coding, and drafting letters. Those who fail to adapt risk falling behind. As a side note, this message has been enhanced with AI.

[@NiniDeserve]

This is not true AT ALL. I put in my papers from my undergrad from 2014 in this Undetectable Ai and it told me that it was written by Ai 99% which is just rubbish since Ai was not around at that time.

[@andreinikiforov2671]

The Originality AI seems overly sensitive, skewing towards false positives. I tested one of my original articles from the early 2000s, and it labeled it as 79% AI-generated. It appears to default to marking everything as AI-produced unless proven otherwise. It's a case of 'guilty until proven innocent'

[@JohnDlugosz]

This reminds me of the case where the professor flunked the entire class for using ChatGPT to write the essays, even though they did not. Seems his tool was flagging everything as "AI detected" regardless of whether or not it actually was written by AI. 100% false positive! How do we know that's not what's happening to you? Perhaps any well-organized grammatically correct text is flagged as AI.

[@celsoruiz4339]

Great video. Time for college to stop using essays and get into testing and quizzes.

[@utkugunaydn4822]

Thanks for the video!

[@user-fx8wk6xb1e]

It worked. Thanks for the tip.

[@OiVinn-eq1ml]

Great video! I feel like while people are just discovering the advantages to use AI for academic work, there is a small gap to even take advantage it. The speed of technology & AI is just too fast.

[@prayagregmi369]

Just gone through your comment, I want to suggest to use another tool @stealthwriter. I have been using it for multiple writing purposes so give it a try I'm sure you are going to like it.

[@Rakkeyal]

Something I've been doing is - I will use OneNote to dictate what I want to say, and then ask ChatGPT to fix the grammar and punctuation errors from the dictation software. Then I can usually ask it to improve the item "while keeping my personal style of writing". This usually gets 0% detection on GPTZero. To be fair though, at that point basically all the content is already mine. That is my way of getting past my "blank page" writers block.

[@bigbee3289]

gpt zero is useless with teh new version of chat gpt, your writing is still gonna get flagged as ai in turnitin

[@uniquehandle1999]

This was the only real breakdown I have found. Thank you Andy for this honest and straightforward breakdown. I thought there was a cheat code to smash out blog posts, but alas, the hard work can never be bypassed it seems! haha

[@giuliamay_quinb_academy]

that is my conclusion too - back to writing it all myself

[@bro_dBow]

My take is like showing your steps in math solution, you can give meta data, which are the stages of paper to prove its veracity. It is something like what we called footnotes.

[@lifegenius763]

Great video..very informative 👍 I think we’re all getting used to these AI tools but I guess the issue is that they are here to stay and undoubtedly will be one sophisticated in the future. What really worries me are these AI dectectors giving 100% red flags to self-generated/original work!? How ridiculous 😮 You are absolutely right to be ethical throughout to avoid any reasonable doubt and or accusations of academic dishonesty. One should only use Chat GPT as an assistant and not the writer. Always best to start off writing your work in your way, doing a self evaluation, make manual changes, ask AI to suggest additional thoughts/angles and cite the evidence as you would with books/references, re-draft your work, put it through undetectable AI then through originality AI as a final check, then check it all a manually again the next day with a fresh pair of eyes, add your own style and personal touches, add quotes, diagrams, submit it and wait 😊 So unfortunate now that it’s all becoming a minefield and my worry is that students may decide to dumb down their academic standards to avoid AI detection!? There has to be a compromise here if AI is here to stay 😢

[@cintiaspataro3205]

In my experience so far, I check paragraphs that show 90 plus porcent of AI when I manually paraprhased it entirely. This is gonna bring trouble because often times will appear to be AI generated when it is not. We'll see.

[@digantamudoi1785]

Really, You have done a great job.👍

[@boredscientist5756]

Glad I wrote my thesis before AI craziness. I would have been SO tempted 😂

[@DrAndyStapleton]

Me too!

[@pointingtojesus247]

Run your thesis on any of them, it will still show AI detected. The whole thing is shit!

[@jacksonscarrabelotti]

It's like anything, as long as your using it as a tool. Just like spell check and grammerly. I don't see any issue with it.

[@ichtozavuzovsky8370]

@@jacksonscarrabelotti Grammarly modifications use ai and are detected as such, that's the problem.

[@23andrelopes]

There is another way, just ask AI to give you some ideas, then write some sentences by yourself, be comprehensive, then ask AI to re write

[@hrtlsmoe]

and that's the best way to do it, instead of asking it to write as a whole :), but also fix reviese and edit it, ask ai to use alternate words according to your understanding. In that sense you make it your own from ai generated text.

[@ReprogramYourMind555]

Great explanation that ai should be used as a tool rather than a replacement.

[@MichaelBrueckner]

Now, what does Unicheck say, if you have actually written the text by yourself?

[@squpsqup2708]

Unfortunately, that’s going to be nightmare for students who is even writing by themselves without any using gpt but still detecting as ai ,academic will not understand that till 3 years will pass

[@a1c3b29]

Just what I wanted!!

[@mukhtarabdi824]

Hi Andy, thanks for the video. We would appreciate if you could make a video like this about text corrected or paraphrased by AI like chatGPT. I mean using ChatGPT like grammarly and Quilbot, but not to generate text.

[@hegels86spirit]

It's on the video. Check it carefully.

[@Genius-Freedom]

Originality gained soooo much input data during the past few months that it is now saturated... so anything is scanned as AI. I believe it's done. There are others tools to detect your texts. Try to use more than one, compare and adjust.

[@unmotivated_might]

There is absolutely no way to 100% determine if something is written by AI. I even passed an old paper through this and it still gave about 60% confidence that it has been written by an AI. And the last time I checked, I was very human. I'm a computer science grad so I've been trying to crack what patterns these detection tools look for determining AI generated content. The level of false positives given by these tools leads me to believe that there is no quantifiable method that can be used to detect AI generated content. Accuracy of AI detection is also substantially worse than the accuracy of information in AI generated content. Detection tools should never be used as a grounds for dismissal in academia, given how they are biased to give out a false positive. Being fairly new, there hasn't been any acceptable form of large scale testing for the detection tools. Any product that hasn't been tested with large datasets by multiple third parties, should not be implemented to determine futures of students.

[@g.personal342]

100000% correct. We are now using algorithms to detect other algorithms. Should we create another algorithm to detect those algorithms detecting each other? This is nonsensical, how stupid are we getting at this point?

[@SamuelWebster]

I use some AI tools in my research. I've found it pretty useless at writing anything for me, but I do use it to provide a very short summary of papers (which is labelled as AI generated, and is thus never used anywhere but in my Bibliography notes on Obsidian - not actually for my dissertation, but I'm trying to build an archive of stuff I've read so I can find things again in post-doc/other non academic situations) and use an AI Obsidian plug-in which other notes each of my notes is 'similar to' (it's a basic similarity checker with a percentage output) which helps me connect ideas I have written on separate occasions about different texts. The fear, of course, is that if I write 'AI tools were used in the research portion of this dissertation, but not in a way where their output was used as part of the dissertation itself', I would still run the risk of people without a full overview of the system assuming it meant I didn't read the papers, or that I didn't write the notes. Of course, a paper trail of my notes exists, as well as my highlighting and multiple drafts, and none of my notes would ever trigger an AI detector (because none of my notes use AI), but would it be worth going through the hassle? My experience is that AI can't write a decent high school essay, let alone a focused dissertation, but there are a lot of people out there using ChatGPT as if it's smart and not just a language model.

[@SamuelWebster]

On that note, I'm actually super pro-AI detection. The only way AI is going to get useful implementation in academia/elsewhere is if there is no fear of it plagiarising or cheating. There are clever ways to use a super powered computer that takes high level language input/output to make life easier - having it write your essay is the one I would be least interested in.

[@SamuelWebster]

The most valuable piece of advice I can give for anyone looking into using AI at all in their workflow is this: Mark EVERY SINGLE thing that AI gives you as 'AI generated' or 'GPT'. You need to be 100% sure that it can never make its way into your drafts. Another tip is to refuse asking AI to do tasks which involve writing anything longform. Some tools (Research Rabbit and LitCharts for example) are AI powered and helpful, but not in the realm of ethical incursion.

[@dammydan2859]

Thanks for the insightful video, but a quick question, please. Will my content count as AI content if I create content and use Chatgpt to paraphrase it for fluency? In other words, will the paraphrase of my content by Chatgpt count as AI content? Thanks in anticipation of your scholarly responses

[@fridabenazzouz9564]

Thanks ❤

[@dudeseriously57]

I'm dating myself here, but I remember when I was in the 7th grade, calculators were a complete no-no. Writing essays with AI reminds me of that-just my thought.

[@snailrancher]

Ah, a fellow Gen Xer 😊. I always had to leave my Casio calculator watch on the teacher’s desk

[@user-dd7pq2to3o]

Can we be sure originality doesnt just score everything high for ai? What if you get it to check a bunch of self written work?

[@bonniehoke-scedrov4906]

Great video! Thanks! WOW. Very powerful. ********************** Listened to the end and I love your conclusion about using it as a tool, NOT to generate content. Very reassuring. Thank you so much!

[@llbodlearning8591]

Thankyou

[@evanext802]

One big issue is that simply correcting 100% original work and running it through Grammarly can show up as AI. This has been happening while I have been writing comps for grad school. I am worried that schools will use Originality as some sort of definitive answer, when it seems to not link scientific writing that has perfect syntax and Grammarly corrected. I have multiple examples saved on my computer that show a before and after with Grammarly being the only difference, so that I can defend myself if I am accused. side note: I rean this for AI: it came back 94% likely human. Got this from grammerly: One big issue is that simply correcting 100% original work and running it through Grammarly can appear as AI. This has been happening while I have been writing comps for grad school. I am worried that schools will use Originality as some definitive answer when it seems not to link scientific writing that has perfect syntax and Grammarly corrected. I have multiple examples saved on my computer that show a before and after, with Grammarly being the only difference, so I can defend myself if I am accused. now its 53% likely AI. take away... Originality is a false positive machine. Just to pass its "detection" you have to write worse on purpose. They are going to lose a bunch of lawsuits if students get kicked out of programs as a result of their tool.

[@seanaevelyn7518]

Just came on to say this as well. I took a sentence that I wrote. Originality identified it as original, but I used Notion AI to check it for errors. It didn’t make any changes and it flagged as 100% AI. This is a terrible tool.

[@evanext802]

@@seanaevelyn7518 it is a false positive machine. What’s funny.. you can take something as 100% AI, mess with it one word at a time, and you get one little change that will turn it to human. It makes no logical sense.

[@UniversityAIed]

As you may already know, Grammerly Go is just another Chat GPT API. So, under the hood of Grammerly Go is Chat GPT. Are you using Grammerly Go?

[@evanext802]

@@UniversityAIed no,. Simply using the checker that fixes syntax and gives suggestions on how to improve clarity. The tool that have been available for a long time

[@ChefRonJenkins]

This is so true. I have tested my work and a few of my son's middle school essays. Original work 95% human, then with grammarly 100% AI. I have come to the conclusion that originality AI is to grammar sensitive to use for anything.

[@mandella_effect]

i am currently writing my thesis of Bachelors and i am using AI to generate research questions, find the research gap and a little bit of main points for research. i plan on expanding on these points to get a final result. let's hope this bogus AI detection doesn't ruin my work

[@Academic_Bites]

Good luck! 🙂

[@mayy7s_]

how did you do?

[@mandella_effect]

@@Academic_Bites Got A+ 12.0 Grade points.. Aced it

[@saberalavi8729]

I have a question/ problem; the issue is, when you generate a text with chatgpt, then paraphrased by any tool, once you copy the paraphrased text and paste it into chatgpt again, it will detect the text. So far none of the websites/tool for paraphrasing works. have you tried this?

[@consideritdunn691]

Loving the Hoodie Andy 👍

[@DrAndyStapleton]

Thank you 👍 Made it myself!

[@romanfanta3990]

I have very mixed experiences with these detectors. I tried to put my text into HiveModeration, ZeroGPT, GPTzero, Writefull, Copyleaks, AI DETECTOR, AI Text Classifier, and now OriginalityAI. I tried to put two versions of the same text into them. The first version is raw text in latex format (with citations and equations in Latex format) and the second version is text copied from pdf. Some of them show that there is some AI written text, some that it is original work, and some of them with one version showing it is original work, but the other version is not. OriginalityAI shows it is AI written text most of the time based on one word or phrase, which is general. Most of them label the text below the equation explaining each variable as AI-written or as plagiarism. The most crucial thing is that they don't understand how citations work. They show sentence is written by AI because they have maybe seen it during their training and ignored that there is a citation right after that sentence. Showing that the original text is written by AI when it is not can be very dangerous.

[@skd]

Ai detection doesn't work. Everytime you get a 100% score, question it. I copy-paste old articles from 2008 into ai detection and it was 100% AI. So yeah, AI detection is just not working. Try it yourself.

[@MacAutomationTips]

But what about using AI that based on our own knowledge base? I use Mem and the AI draws upon the content-notes, thoughts, and quotes-that I write or paste in my Mem notebook. Mem Ai doesn’t crab content from outside my knowledge base. But it can write content based on the content I provide it.

[@saarapollonen8138]

So I did my university thesis about 10 years ago when any of this stuff hadn't surfaced yet and for fun run it through one of these AI detectives and got that my own hard work, blood, sweat and tears (I wrote that bloody thing for 8 months) is 80% likely written by AI. Like what the actual fffffffffff 😮 am I an android? 😂

[@tamtam9034]

Consider this as a compliment 😂

[@suma9684]

It means you're too good at writing to be a human 😂

[@MarkSanchez-dp6nn]

Great video. I’m curious to know if it’s the copying and pasting the text from the AI generator that is flagging the content and if I just typed in what was generated would fix the issue. My other thought is I wonder if the data from using AI in general is collected and shared and that’s how other programs know hour similar to AI the content is. Curious to know your thoughts.

[@user-mp3eh1vb9w]

Wrong. I placed a bible verse and it got flagged as 100% AI. Or is it correct?

[@nee7886]

😂😂😂

[@aronuchukwuezugo615]

I am a 35 year old man. I am a 35 year old man. One of those statements was written by an AI, and the other written by a human. Good luck differentiating which one.

[@oneplus1090]

Andy please do a video on how to use plugins on gpt4 for research

[@ColinBell78]

This is all very well, but the most important question is, where did you get that hoodie?

[@angyangela07]

I agree with another comment that this video is most likely an ad. Andy is tempted considering his large audience since his experiment is biased. It does not include running an entirely original text thru the detectors. Most likely such text will also be marked as produced by AI. If institutions start using those detectors, most likely we will need to start making mistakes on purpose. The hope is that academia will embrace the inevitable technological changes, accept the idea of using technology as help and start adjusting assignments and the way students’ work is evaluated. As for dissertations, I hope that the originality of the scientific work is what is actually important. At least in STEM disciplines.

[@DrAndyStapleton]

Not an ad. Just trying to be helpful, like in all my videos.

[@rv8804]

@@DrAndyStapleton it kinda screams like an AD especially since u didnt mention that you added referral links to the services that you say FOR SURE ARE THE ONLY THINGS THAT WOOOORK. You get paid each time someone signs up using your link. Seems a bit suspect.

[@ASSASSINMACHETE]

Andy, try the summarized version of quill bot

[@hudsonfrank1121]

I've always rewrote what ai generates into my own words and never had teachers suspect it

[@lungelozain3100]

IT WORKED!!

[@scoobygang911]

How would you do a literature review if even when you put your own words it identifies 97% AI?

[@markuspatzer8658]

Hi Andy today ! Thanks for that great information 👍 My problem is with chatgpt plugins and their templates, write an blog post, set the tone, style etc,etc, no matter which prompts I use when I check it in free quillbot AI detector or scribbr it always shows= 100% AI, so it makes me so confusing. Something is wrong but I not find out the culprit. Maybe is it the "robotic" structure chatgpt gives me; the structure with multiple outline, chapters, subchapters and all that? Nobody does writing like this one exception; long form pillar content ,yep there you need this but not with an article or blog post. I Hope you have an idea Andy what is wrong here with me or my prompts?

[@40NoNameFound-100-years-ago]

Dude , I am currently writting a paper, this helped me a lot. Thank you. I am wondering how does an app or software,or a website is able to differentiate between an AI and a human written document? ..

[@googm]

Smoke and mirrors and clever product placements on a reputable KZbin channel.

[@Academic_Bites]

It will be just guessing, based on probability. Can go very wrong.

[@John-is9nj]

Any evaluation has to look at both false positive and false negative rates. There is a whole field on mathematically evaluating detection methods.

[@JaskoonerSingh]

Life saver

[@SteveWray]

Undetectable is rubbish. They seem to think that by inserting lots of punctuation and grammar errors, they will be more human. One of its favorite tricks seems to be something like this: 'The field of "Compliance Management" plays a role, in guaranteeing that activities comply with laws, rules and industry norms.' Note that comma after 'role'. I found that it created this structure in almost every input that I gave it. Did you actually read the output? How could you recommend something like this?

[@Faceless_Mailjam]

YOU CAN PUT YOUR WORK BEHIND A PAY WALL -> thus you don't have to worry about Google. Your customers will appreciate your new content and no spelling errors.

[@morleyjade2408]

The output is without grammar errors. Unreadable. When you use grammar corrections tools . It gets detected as ai generated. If you tried to edit the document yourself. It still gets flagged as ai content

[@jayhendrickson199]

Hi Andy! Thanks for the video. I came across a video of another guy who mentioned Undetectable ai with similar results. Also just today I watched a video about Phrasly ai. Maybe you can test it out?

[@DrAndyStapleton]

Check out tomorrows video!

[@jayhendrickson199]

@@DrAndyStapleton YAY!!! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

[@dr.gregorysmith3120]

Could you put some human written text into that AI detection to see if the AI detection algorithm works, or it just throwing false positives for everything?

[@_Macsie]

Looking at that output from undetectable, its really spotty. If that is what the output is, I cannot make a case for it.

[@user-fz7nw2jl9d]

I'm a freelancer but I have to stop writing essays coz of these AI detection tools. I hope guys making these algorithms are aware that wrong predictions can really end careers or even cause bad grades and they are at fault. Do i have to write dumb to pass an AI check?

[@NotoriousB1RD]

If the product is correct and an accurate reflection of the author's views, the literature cited, and the results of the original research, then who cares if an ai, a person, or some combination thereof created the manuscript? If it is good enough to pass peer review, that's all that matters

[@drdarien777]

Andy, from what I understand, AI puts a thumbprint in the code beneath the actual words and word order. It is akin to the metadata of a photo or mathematical equation. If the AI detection can pick up this AI thumbprint, how the text is written will not matter. This is why some AI detectors can be fooled, and some can't. Some only look for wording, while a few look for code. I wonder if undetectable strips the thumbprint from the text? Love this video. The ethics of AI use in Academia are still evolving. I use AI as a TA, Research Assistant, and Copyeditor.

[@RaveyDavey]

It does not put a thumbprint in.

[@LinwoodBlackmore]

If that were the case then paraphrasing would be 100% effective at evading detection

[@peronkop]

That is nonsense.

[@littlesparrow2444]

I need your advice on turnitin which is what should i do? Should i copy from chatgpt and put on quillbot to paraphrase and then put that paraphrase text on undetectable AI or should i just copy text on chatgpt and put on Undetectable AI directly?

[@Docendo1121discimus]

Trial and Error approach?

[@emav]

Can you tray to check stealth writer tool also?

[@gRosh08]

Cool.

[@RaveyDavey]

If it’s detecting human paraphrasing as 100 percent AI then what is it detecting exactly?

[@sevenwindsflutes]

I find undetectable does seem to work better. However I still only get 30% human 70% ai. I share the frustration. The bottom line for website usage is will google lower the site ranking if it detects aI/

[@DavidPeterson.]

Agree with other comments about the paraphrasing bit. Paraphrasing of done correctly is NOT plagiarism. And also should not be considered “ai”. So if you paraphrase ai, a book, a podcast, or whatever else. It IS considered legit and should not be considered the original.

[@danielMills-nd8jj]

I was recently flagged at 99% AI written despite me writing my paper entirely myself.

[@giuliamay_quinb_academy]

I tried the undetectable tool many times to make content More Human and it did not work at all. It seems that AI checkers have caught up with the tool. I was hopeful, but it did not work. Any other suggestions?

[@secretclasher481]

originality generates 100% of AI detection even in already published papers even when chat gpt was not created

[@dtrcs9518]

I usually write the entire text and ask if there's improvements to the readability, grammar etc. Does this also get flagged?

[@SuperiorRecaps]

Dude just redo the answer in your own words it will never get detected, revise revise revise

[@jamesbundi1468]

I have to say that AI detection tools are so unreliable and punishing quality content as well

[@darlamckinnon4546]

I have the paid version of GPT Zero (which they apparently use for academia). Apparently this is supposed to be THE one.

[@umangramsuroop732]

What happens if I write my own text but use chatgpt to improve my text?

[@idiosinkrazijske.rutine]

Remove all the paintings from the Louvre where the help of camera obscura is greater than 35%.

[@nicotesta]

Does it work with other languages? Spanish for example..

[@tomtabasco3517]

Is this a commercial? Do you have a stack in this app? You should reveal possible conflict of interests.

[@pygmy_leopard]

its good for emails and stuff that doesn't matter.

[@GravityFailure]

Here is a problem as well. I have written completely original works and put it through detection and sometimes it will come back as AI generated. BTW, cursing is a good way if you are using Chat GPT as it won't generate vulgar language. As my guy here is saying use it as a tool. Beware though, run your own work through the detection options available because it may just think your original work isn't original, especially if you read a lot, you may have something that is considered derivative. I suppose ghost writers are going to have some problems as well. Cheers 🍺 and good luck!

[@user-jd9gy3co5v]

All is just they are selling their product. I am writing a text with my own, and the software detects 99% Ai. All these companies are interconnected to buy one software than another software.

[@vanilla__latte]

articlerewriter seems to work as well, although I only checked using undetectableai, not originality. I am kind of gutted that the content paraphrased by the user gets flagged as AI, as I often generate drafts and "build" on them. It helps me massively with writing blocks when I would sit for hours not writing a single word and then suddenly write 500 words in 15 minutes. Sure, I finish eventually, but the stress is not worth it.

[@mei_tunes]

Don't worry, there are 100% fool proof ways of prompting to avoid this. Its so easy. All you need to do is get chatgpt to analyse a previous piece of your non AI written work, or work written by someone with a lot more linguistic flare. Ask it to analyse the tone, language, sentence structure, rhythm, ask it why it is completely different to chatGPT style of writing, literary devices, use of punctuation and styles it sounds similar to. Then copy and paste chatGPTs analysis and ask it to rewrite following the rules.

[@vanilla__latte]

@@mei_tunes thanks so much, I'll give it a go! 🙏

[@amantyagi9081]

​@@vanilla__lattedid the above prompt work for you?