Michio Kaku is IN CONTROL! (361)

  Рет қаралды 113,121

Dr Brian Keating

Dr Brian Keating

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 774
@JURSSICZ
@JURSSICZ Жыл бұрын
Oh look another REUPLOAD. Very misleading Brian, your channel will never grow this way, you're getting terrible advice if you think so. If you reupload make sure to mention it's a reupload and put the original date in the title.
@hervigdewilde3599
@hervigdewilde3599 Жыл бұрын
You mean like the bit in the description that says: "In this repost episode of Into the Impossible from 2021..." 😉
@himanshu36010
@himanshu36010 10 ай бұрын
Kaku can win nobel prize in comedy, guy is hilarious af
@specialbeamcharlie7250
@specialbeamcharlie7250 Жыл бұрын
So Michio's response to the criticisms of string theory is basically "Haters are just jealous" lol
@sergejadam8860
@sergejadam8860 Жыл бұрын
I'm jealous too, I want money without performance but their sermon is more fun than in church😟
@manusarma
@manusarma 5 ай бұрын
We have one Scientist who introduce himself as a doctor (to remind us and him), asking us to click the like button and subscribe to the channel. While the other boasting about his invention of a theory followed by the praises he received. What a great science show! I’d watch it again.
@LimousineIndianapol1
@LimousineIndianapol1 7 ай бұрын
If he is Einstein then Forest Gump is the next Nikola Tesla! He still leads the dead end string theory!
@vincewatkins8439
@vincewatkins8439 4 ай бұрын
Kaku isn’t even a scientist. By definition, scientists practice science. Calling Kaku the next Einstein is like calling dog poop the next chocolate. His entire career has amounted to less than completing today’s sudoku.
@illomens2766
@illomens2766 Жыл бұрын
Michio Kaku, master of making outlandish claims with no evidence behind them. This man's a con artist.
@shmick4203
@shmick4203 Жыл бұрын
I’m glad someone else can see this!
@JamesCairney
@JamesCairney Жыл бұрын
There is a big difference between a media "luvie" and a con man. A con man has something useless to sell, a media luvie is trying to sell themselves. He is a media luvie looking for a wage from an audience. It's easier than doing science. Physics is full of media luvies, Brian Cox, Brian Green, Mr Tyson. The list is long.
@siddbastard
@siddbastard Жыл бұрын
@@shmick4203 yes, yes yes YES !!!
@johncurtis142
@johncurtis142 Жыл бұрын
Yep...I'm with Eric W....
@PrivateSi
@PrivateSi Жыл бұрын
Electro-Positronic Field: -ve gas binds a ball of +ve cells freed by Full Escape Energy as electron-positron pairs +ve/-ve Particles: pull in/pump out then pump out/pull in -ve gas that collides at the centre and spirals out at 90' Spin: lateral outflow force cancels in all directions but motion increases -ve gas intake, biasing spin at 90' to travel Magnetism: spin flows straight to a neighbour. Energy conservation and field balance preservation cause external circuits Mass: inward -ve gas flow acceleration drags spheres of cells further apart inwardly but closer laterally to a packed core Gravity: like mass but slower acceleration with drag on field cells cancelled by dark energy so cells remain equidistant Dark Energy: more -ve gas near mass shrinks field, expanded by less in voids + new matter creation / black hole growth Heavy Force: mass multiplier mechanism pulls in field before annihilating all heavy composite particle cores but protons Heavy Fusion: in the Big Bang (and stars?) 2 positrons oppositely hit 1 electron (more than 2 electrons hit 1 positron) Proton: (pep) 3 core particles heavily fused. The 2 half neutralised positrons repel each other preventing annihilation Neutron: (pep_e). Beta- radiation loses the electron, beta+ is a new positron expelled and electron retained by a proton Positronium: (e_p) 0 core particles, muon (ep_e) 2 core, tau (epep_e) 4 core. Neutron mass is halfway between muon and tau Antimatter: 1,2 e_p pairs annihilate, 3 make a muon or proton+anti muon/proton, 4 a neutron+anti neutron, 5 a tau+anti tau Lifespan: (anti) muons/taus at close to electric force speed (C) barely feel it but Heavy Force takes over when they slow Nuclear Force: neutron electrons bond to protons. Mass and magnetism compacts and strengthens the nucleus Black Hole: converts all matter to heavy force e+p crystal with a slowly annihilating centre, preventing a singularity Photon: compressed, concentrated -ve gas wave core pulls in field cells as it passes. Field warps diffract and interfere 2 Slit Experiment: photon/particle field warps diffract and interfere, guiding the core. Detectors interfere with guides Entanglement: field physically links objects but there could be hidden variables (ie. absolute temporal synchronisation)
@yaserthe1
@yaserthe1 Жыл бұрын
Kaku, has literally repeated everything he said in the podcast , verbatim on a 1000 other interviews .
@DjRenect
@DjRenect Жыл бұрын
He’s a bit of a weird one. Ask Jim Norton.
@Spawn303
@Spawn303 Жыл бұрын
Eric Weinstein is right
@yrebrac
@yrebrac Жыл бұрын
To me he talks what sounds like science to the uneducated and sounds like empty fluff to me
@metalhead375
@metalhead375 Жыл бұрын
@@yrebrac1000% with you.
@floor5173
@floor5173 Жыл бұрын
He's definitely crazy
@phpn99
@phpn99 Жыл бұрын
Kaku is a professional fabulator. The US media system has bred this genre of "performance scientists" who get swallowed whole by their stage act. It's no longer valid to call Kaku a scientist, nor is it valid to name any of the others, like Tyson, Greene, Weinstein, etc. They're all posers trying to ride the coattails of Sagan, who created the genre. The one who toyed with it but managed to remain a scientist was Feynman. I listen to this sort of podcast vulgarisation as drunk priests debating the gender of angels. A decent exception in the influencer-sphere (to a degree) is Hossenfelder, who is much less of a storyteller than she is a reporter, with sometimes an opinion piece and a wicked sense of humour. I think the narcissistic segment of this posse needs to re-imagine the nature of their discourse : The patent risk in excess vulgarisation, is to make a travesty of the complexity inherent to the subject matter. Instead of trying to pander to the mass market, focus on the relatively literate audience, like Rovelli and Turok do, and avoid crafting misleading and ultimately idiotic soundbites like "God Equation". Also, drop the ridiculous Gandalf demeanour and get back down to earth. The "prophet" persona is so tired.
@____uncompetative
@____uncompetative Жыл бұрын
Very interesting insights.
@billballinger5622
@billballinger5622 Жыл бұрын
SUPER well said. Only thing I would add is that Feynman was a moron just the same
@sidhuggins9387
@sidhuggins9387 Жыл бұрын
He is working on a problem that hasn't had a solution in over 70 years ... they still don't have it.
@markarmage3776
@markarmage3776 7 ай бұрын
Oh, I'm sorry, is the quest of mankind in searching for the nature of our Universe taking too long for you? Homie, show some respect, the likes of you are enjoying the results of things done by other people that you're completely incapable of doing.
@michael-4k4000
@michael-4k4000 6 ай бұрын
Michio is "out of control "
@Grandunifiedcelery
@Grandunifiedcelery Жыл бұрын
*Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts (Richard Feynman)*
@madislanddoctor
@madislanddoctor 10 ай бұрын
String theory is dead. Forget Occam's Razor. More like, Occam's Axe.
@henryjfischer
@henryjfischer Жыл бұрын
Michiu Kaku often speaks aimlessly. That diatribe about wolf pecking orders did not contribute anything to his conclusion about how far we are from artificial general intelligence.
@uninspired3583
@uninspired3583 Жыл бұрын
It's also factually wrong. Dogs know we aren't dogs, just how they interact with each other vs us. They get super excited to see other dogs, they don't react the same way to see a person walking down the sidewalk. Also, alpha authority in wolf packs has been debunked. It's like he's trying to be wrong in as many ways as he can.
@gasperstarina9837
@gasperstarina9837 Жыл бұрын
Also not to mention his very poor knowledge about quantum computers...he was also the seller of "positive thinking vibration" 10-15 years ago...so I think for him it might be good to enjoy his pension...
@michaelbarker6460
@michaelbarker6460 Жыл бұрын
@@uninspired3583 Bruh you're just jealous. Michio always sniffs butts when he greets new people he doesn't know. Thats why he says dogs think we're dogs. He's just way more alpha than any of us.
@weichen5596
@weichen5596 11 ай бұрын
He just wants to talk to have fun, useless
@classicalmechanic8914
@classicalmechanic8914 6 ай бұрын
String theory is a religion and everyone who disagree is envious infidel.
@d0ubtingThom4s
@d0ubtingThom4s Жыл бұрын
Sadly, just because a dude tries his hardest to look like Einstein does *not* make him the next Einstein
@dougsie8791
@dougsie8791 Жыл бұрын
Sometimes I wish we could find a perfect internet theory to end poor streaming quality.
@AV8R654
@AV8R654 Жыл бұрын
Yes indeed outrageous that he even uploads this, smh.
@daffidavit
@daffidavit Жыл бұрын
In 1972 I was a sophomore at FIT in Melbourne Fl. All students, even those who studied economics,. were required to take a year of chemistry, physics, and different fields of math. But at no time were we ever exposed to particle physics. The closest we came was chemistry. I despised physics during those years, but learned to love it many years later on an amature level after reading books by Hawking, Kaku, Greene, Susskind and the like. Interviews like this are worth their weight in gold, IMHO.
@tobyw9573
@tobyw9573 Жыл бұрын
Physical chemistry (P-Chem) is I was told, (too late) is the key to chemistry and the fun part.
@michael-4k4000
@michael-4k4000 Жыл бұрын
Element 115
@gene4094
@gene4094 Жыл бұрын
From my career in Analytical Chemistry, I realized that anomalies are places where new science happens. With the impending Climate Change catastrophe looming, we need a new source of energy. This anomaly is the Nobel Prize winner “Negative Refractive Index Meta Materials” (NRIMM). This phenomenon of these Synthetic (NRIMM) material create energy by a refraction of an electromagnetic field that creates a catalyst that creates energy. To make this process shorter; this electromagnetic field is pumped into a (NRIMM) Bismuth ferrite catalyst that absorb and increase its energy as a blue-shift.
@SpotterVideo
@SpotterVideo Жыл бұрын
Both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature. (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree. String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. ===================== Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length ) The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge. Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles. .
@davidkrase2801
@davidkrase2801 Жыл бұрын
Can't even stop killing each other.
@Thengloz
@Thengloz 9 ай бұрын
Word
@gaetonzorzi9595
@gaetonzorzi9595 Жыл бұрын
I’m really starting to question the sanity of both these guys
@ruslb818
@ruslb818 10 ай бұрын
same here.
@shane1067
@shane1067 9 ай бұрын
imo most visionaries need a little edge to them, it feels natural as that's why you've gone so far outside of a common living.
@frankicon9521
@frankicon9521 7 ай бұрын
Eric Weinstein, is that you 😂
@Rustinpeace117
@Rustinpeace117 Жыл бұрын
The only criticism of your podcast I have Mr. Keating, is that you tend to repost interviews you did in the past as new content, and it is not quite clear when the interview has taken place. It would be helpful if you clearly labeled the dates of interviews. Other than that, I appreciate your work and please continue to bring in these most excellent guests!
@YoungChunds
@YoungChunds Жыл бұрын
Agreed
@spaceted3977
@spaceted3977 3 ай бұрын
I think Prof Michio is brilliant ! There are some scientists who are a bit Jealous of him. (So he must be Really Good !)
@andreykolmogorov4424
@andreykolmogorov4424 Жыл бұрын
The thumbnail is just good trolling.Well done Dr Keating 😅😂😂
@siddbastard
@siddbastard Жыл бұрын
sometimes the troll isn't worth the cringe
@ericberman4193
@ericberman4193 7 ай бұрын
The “next Einstein”??? Really????
@michael-4k4000
@michael-4k4000 6 ай бұрын
Give me a break? Eric Weinstein is "the man" 😮
@sharthakghosh970
@sharthakghosh970 6 ай бұрын
I was 12 when I heard about string theory on discovery science. I am 30 now, still the same shit
@frankfaga
@frankfaga 5 ай бұрын
“Michio Kaku the next Einstein”?! “A wonderful reputation as a world-class scientist?” Sorry. You just lost me. (You also compared him to Captain Kirk? At least Star Trek was relatively realistic for its time and inspiration future.)
@sgramstrup
@sgramstrup Жыл бұрын
Dogs don't think we are dogs. That's not science.
@tofo2
@tofo2 7 ай бұрын
Dogs like us because we share the interest of food.
@RWin-fp5jn
@RWin-fp5jn Жыл бұрын
Michio is ok. And Michio’s string theory in itself isn’t a bad idea. He is 100% correct that elementary particles are NOT to be seen as little erratic moving biljart balls, but excitations of one and the same omnipresent field, where the different orthogonal modes they can vibrate in, determining their classification. Where string theory DOES next lose the plot is that such vibrational distortions can’t be actually cut-off from the fabric as ‘loose’ objects. A Universal equilibrium always requires connectivity to the all-engulfing spacetime fabric, that Einstein called ‘aether’ in his 1920 `Leiden lecture’ closing words. I urge anyone to read these closing words. Only if attached, can orthogonal vibrations, cause longitudinal contractions in the same fabric, which -o surprise- is what causes gravity in the first place. As such, the true theory of gravity is Einstein special relativity where speed causes vibrations in the fabric it moves in, contracting frontal space and time, which is wrapped in a standing wave of orthogonal ‘quanta’ of windings around the speeding object thus ‘giving it’ extra mass (inverse time) and energy (inverse space). This is why space and time are not each others ‘equivalent’ and neither are energy and mass (Penrose got that right!). We don’t NEED a ToE, as we already have one. For 100 years we were told not to look under our feet. Is suggest we do and start applying it if we want to become a spacefaring species…
@seriousmaran9414
@seriousmaran9414 Жыл бұрын
I will believe it when there is actual evidence to support it.
@zarat5151
@zarat5151 Жыл бұрын
That is an interesting idea, I'm with you that particles cannot be viewed as independent from the fabric that encompasses them. And even when you said speed causes vibrations in the fabric contracting space and time, I could understand it as a rephrasing of time dilation and length contraction. But when you said, "wrapped in a standing wave of orthogonal ‘quanta’ of windings around the speeding object thus ‘giving it’ extra mass (inverse time) and energy (inverse space)." I feel this is pure conjecture, have you done any calculations to demonstrate that such a formulation is equivalent to current predictive theory?
@michael-4k4000
@michael-4k4000 Жыл бұрын
Mr Michio created String Theory to solve an equation that Einstein was working on when he died....
@seriousmaran9414
@seriousmaran9414 Жыл бұрын
@@michael-4k4000 and actual detection of strings?
@S1nwar
@S1nwar Жыл бұрын
15:03 wow what a bunch of nonsense. you dont need friggin god to celebrate the achievments of fellow humans
@frankicon9521
@frankicon9521 7 ай бұрын
Please get Michio Kaku and Eric Weinstein in one discussion.
@michael-4k4000
@michael-4k4000 6 ай бұрын
OK bud we will try to make this happen. Thanks for watching bud.
@michael-4k4000
@michael-4k4000 6 ай бұрын
Wanted to give u a quick update. Spoke with Brian and he loves the idea 💡...... he wants to make it happen, I want to make it happen, u want to make it happen, u see where this is going?
@frankicon9521
@frankicon9521 6 ай бұрын
@michael-4k4000 If this is legit, thanks for the update, appreciate it
@Dannafilms96
@Dannafilms96 5 ай бұрын
Eric is the one who said Kaku is "out of control" seemingly the reasoning for the title of this vid lol
@AlexStock187
@AlexStock187 4 ай бұрын
@@Dannafilms96 I still can’t get over Eric saying that. I know the sentiment, and I largely agree, I was just caught off guard with both the phrasing and expressive delivery of “Michio Kaku is out of control!” So funny.
@randymartin5500
@randymartin5500 Жыл бұрын
Brian please get Ed Witten on. At 29:42 Dr. Kaku says no, membranes and strings have not been unified, when in fact Witten formulated M-Theory in 1995 which unifies all four sting theory versions with membranes (branes). Sorry but Kaku is biased and not being honest. Back to your question, yes, this is the most comprehensive theory that literally compactifies everything we know about physics into one framework. The problem is the general populace simply does not understand how brilliant the theory is because they are too lazy or don't have time to study how complicated it is. The commutation relations between spin operators are similar to those of the quantum oscillator. The spin values are also quantized with only integer and half integer values. Stern-Gerlach revealed the electrons have half integer due to their opposite orientations + and - when a stream of electrons passes through the magnetic field. Photons have full integer spin 1 unit of angular momentum since they are quanta of the EM field which have U(1) gauge symmetry. Gravitons have spin 2 units of angular momentum moving along the z axis with no polarization but conform to the Einstein field equations with the Rank 2 Ricci curvature tensor. The quantum field is a constant fluctuation of these energy modes exchanging quanta back and forth with interactions between all the names we derived for these "particles" and their "force carriers". But!! We need more degrees of freedom than 4D spacetime since gravitons are so weak in flat space that they "leak" into higher dimensions (sub-manifolds in the quantum vacuum) that our detectors have no hope of seeing with current technologies. Just because our macroscopic instruments can't see a string does not mean its wrong or not there.
@austin_semiconductor4153
@austin_semiconductor4153 Жыл бұрын
He's a kook, I don't know why you would even consider giving him air time. He makes outrageous claims, then gets called out and has to walk it all back. Waste of time. Been doing that for decades.
@phantom5573
@phantom5573 Жыл бұрын
This is tantalizing Dr. Keating. We really need to have Eric Weinstein and Michio have a discussion. It would be entertaining and maybe we call could all learn something.
@michael-4k4000
@michael-4k4000 Жыл бұрын
String theory is a hack 😅
@frankicon9521
@frankicon9521 7 ай бұрын
😂 I would pay to see and listen to Eric Weinstein and Michio Kaku in the same discussion, I would like to hear Eric Weinstein tell Michio Kaku he's "out of control" lol 😂😂
@jessemontano762
@jessemontano762 Жыл бұрын
Michio is gonna say verbatim, what he always says. The picture of Einsteins desk, and his mom wondering why cant he just get a nice Japanese girlfriend
@Entropy825
@Entropy825 Жыл бұрын
Michio Kaku deals in unfalsifiable nonsense. The scientific method involves 1) making an observation for which you have no explanation consistent with all other observations and explanations. 2) proposing an explanation for your new observation that is falsifiable 3) testing the explanation using a test that can potentially refute your explanation, 4)... etc. etc. Michio Kaku's method is this: 1) Do some math. 2) Imagine something no one has ever observed and we have no reason to believe exists 3) Build a multi billion dollar machine to look for your imaginary thing. 4) when you don't find it, make excuses 5) build a bigger machine 6) repeat There is a phrase that describes the worst ideas in science, which is, "Not even wrong." It refers to ideas that are so far off the mark that they would have to be much, much better in order to qualify as mistaken. In other words, incorrect ideas are still better than these ideas. Everything Michio Kaku publicly promotes, everything he is known for as a scientist is "not even wrong".
@jimimased1894
@jimimased1894 Жыл бұрын
agree
@taalguru3105
@taalguru3105 Жыл бұрын
Wolfgang Pauli told it how it is
@DrDeuteron
@DrDeuteron Жыл бұрын
I think String Theory ended physics envy. The nuances of the standard model and GR are cool, but setting to have a single parameter model that fills in the SM constant that winds up with infinity parameters and extra dimensions, making zero testable predictions in 50 years is not something to envy.
@KipIngram
@KipIngram 7 ай бұрын
The NEXT EINSTEIN???? That has got to be the single most ridiculous thing I've heard in... well, a long time.
@_UnknownEntity
@_UnknownEntity Жыл бұрын
Schrodinger laughing from beyond the grave 😂
@guerrabraga
@guerrabraga Жыл бұрын
Michigan Kaku, the New Einstein? hahahahahaha... 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@benjaminbeard3736
@benjaminbeard3736 9 ай бұрын
Maybe the hair.
@bernaldelcastillo1768
@bernaldelcastillo1768 Жыл бұрын
Who said "Michiu Kaku is out of control ?"
@1981bobbyg
@1981bobbyg Жыл бұрын
Eric Weinstein. He's got some nerve calling anyone out of control.
@mark5150ty
@mark5150ty Жыл бұрын
You think he's the next einstein?? That's an insult to Einstein. Him and Neil deGrasse Tyson are the biggest clowns
@davesantos2592
@davesantos2592 Жыл бұрын
Branes consist of woven Strings for a combined String-Brane Theory.
@Andrew-lo5sc
@Andrew-lo5sc Жыл бұрын
I think String Theory lacks a key ingredient. On par with what Einstein has trouble with. A "multiverse" full of universes. Instead of an emphasis on space itself. There is a reason why momentum exists. A physical reason that may not be bound through an understand of particles alone. There's a reason we would not be familiar with a 2d/1d space. It would be extremely detrimental to the health of particles on a whole.
@alienteknology5390
@alienteknology5390 Жыл бұрын
He is absolutely correct. The general public need figures who can make physics interesting to them. In turn, physicists need the public to become more interested. It’s a win for everyone.
@thelawnmoerman
@thelawnmoerman Жыл бұрын
Kaku should’ve taken Edward Teller up on his offer. Would’ve diverted him from this BS, string theory, and more towards something real.
@joshuarichardson6529
@joshuarichardson6529 Жыл бұрын
If you can't find a unicorn, you're not looking very hard. Rhinoceros Unicornis: The one-horned rhino, also called the Indian Rhino. Thats what all references to Unicorns was referring to until the 15th century.
@menelikkkk
@menelikkkk Жыл бұрын
Bro just compared one of the greatest minds humanity has ever seen to an off the wall, mid-table physics orator
@mrcleanisin
@mrcleanisin Жыл бұрын
I've always been fascinated by physics, mathematics, and chess. While I may not be able to match the expertise of these brilliant minds, I've discovered that I have a knack for solving puzzles that even they struggle with. Whether it's deciphering a board game strategy, repairing a malfunctioning appliance, tinkering with a gasoline engine, or devising an innovative solution to an everyday problem, I see it all as a form of puzzle-solving. Inspired by this perspective, I'd like to present my own string theory puzzle. Initially, I envisioned using a stick for this thought experiment, as pushing something seemed more intuitive than pulling it. So, let's imagine we have an extraordinarily rigid, non-stretchable string. If we tug on one end, does the other end react instantaneously? If so, let's insert our string between the Earth and the Moon and pull on the Earth end. Would it instantaneously tug on the Moon? To eliminate the influence of gravity, let's place the string in outer space. And to ensure we don't disrupt the molecules or create a shockwave, let's pull the string gently. Now, let's attempt to prove this with a formula: [0+0=0]. While I recognize this may appear as a simplistic thought experiment, I'm genuinely curious why no scientist has addressed it directly. I understand that some of you may attempt to answer this question, but I kindly request that you present your credentials alongside your response. I hold an Associate of Science degree in Electromechanical Engineering Technology from 1973, and I've spent years fixing broken objects. What have you fixed?
@ashleyobrien4937
@ashleyobrien4937 Жыл бұрын
At 34:11 Michio says we effectively know the inverse square law for gravity works at the galaxy scale, but, does it ? isn't frame dragging that very thing that makes Newtonian gravity fall to pieces ? outer arms of spirals moving much faster than they should ?
@thehomedecorworld5479
@thehomedecorworld5479 Жыл бұрын
Dr Michio Kaku is 76 now, 78 and 83, 85 will be ages when he will give great knowledge to humanitya as to be known as Einstein.
@rastislavbrodziansky2698
@rastislavbrodziansky2698 9 ай бұрын
Sacred (fixed) geometry is the key for understanding the creation of the Universe. Tetrahedron is the building block of our reality. Space, time and consciousness are the three points of reference required for us to be aware of who we are and where we are. Our reality is built on a 9 dimensional model as symbolised by the Metatron's Cube.
@Kronzik
@Kronzik 7 ай бұрын
lay off the DMT and pick up a physics textbook - you'd be much more interested in penrose tiling and quantum optics if you went to school instead of the dispensory.
@treborironwolfe
@treborironwolfe Жыл бұрын
Brian says to his professor, "Here, smell my foot!" ;)
@karlgoebeler1500
@karlgoebeler1500 Жыл бұрын
Law of conservation of Energy and Matter. Was talking on a Facebook account disciples of Micchio Kaku. Talking about teleportation. In a stabilized Singularity there would no room for any addition of energy in the form matter to the singularity. That energy would have to go somewhere. Hawkings solution would create matter on a "Reciever" another stabilized singularity. Wolfgang Pauli's quantum coupling postulated at that time of the effect of recreating and transmitting any object thru both Space and Time.
@001Darkcycle
@001Darkcycle Жыл бұрын
Before we look to AI for wisdom we should remember it has been nowhere and suffered nothing.
@l.lawliet164
@l.lawliet164 Жыл бұрын
It's sad to be in Kaku's place, he is basically the Einstein of our generation, but unable to prove his theory, because we don't have the technology yet. Einstein already reached the most reachable limit that was using light to prove his theory with a eclipse. However Michio need something way more harder, but he is definitely legit, maybe he will get his Nobel prize after death and that would be pretty sad, but we can hope we prove it before that.
@urusledge
@urusledge Жыл бұрын
Based on what?
@loveistheonlything3626
@loveistheonlything3626 Жыл бұрын
He is out of control, not in control. We need physics back.
@theomnisthour6400
@theomnisthour6400 Жыл бұрын
No God worth the name would impose His idea of perfection on everyone else. No one would respect such a putz for more than a day of creation.
@tornadochaser1969
@tornadochaser1969 Жыл бұрын
I do not know a single scientist who has a theory that isn't just a theory for NOW...
@blijebij
@blijebij Жыл бұрын
Don't forget that even aprox 100 years ago Einsteins theory for gravitational waves took science a century to proof. The further we zoom in the harder and more time consuming it will be to proof something.
@rickjason215
@rickjason215 Жыл бұрын
I was never taught about Quantum Physics in college. I had no idea that the quantum world didn’t follow regular world rules.
@user-rx5dh4le5x
@user-rx5dh4le5x Жыл бұрын
What do you call the regular world? Is it classical mechanics?
@Chillypuwn
@Chillypuwn 5 ай бұрын
No
@martinschlegel1823
@martinschlegel1823 Жыл бұрын
So I won’t take String theory as a scientific theory until it gives me measurable predictions. That is the basic minimum for something to be scientific. I really like it because it’s elegant. I personally suspect that it’s neither of the mentioned theories, not String theory, not quanten loop gravity, something either little known today or something nobody has thought up yet.
@cybervigilante
@cybervigilante Жыл бұрын
I suspect Wolfram is right, and it has to do with graph theory.
@martinschlegel1823
@martinschlegel1823 Жыл бұрын
@@cybervigilante that would be possible, have seen some interesting ideas involving graph theory. But at least I haven't seen anything "mature" enough yet to really do anything with it.
@danscieszinski4120
@danscieszinski4120 Жыл бұрын
Take the latent energy of a proton, divide it by the vacuum energy of a plank volume = number of plank monads needed to keep a proton propped up and existing. Now you can extrapolate the total spacetime ‘footprint’ of a single proton. X number of plank volumes transact creating the geodesics that surround and permeate through said proton. This implies the gravitational field boundary of a proton is finite. Someone piggy back, or tell me why the concept couldn’t be used to re-approach GR as a more granular and transactional theory than it is today.
@kanis999
@kanis999 Жыл бұрын
Michio is very likeable, but I wish he hadn't given me false hopes 10 years ago that by now medical tech would let me live for 100s of years.
@nikokapanen82
@nikokapanen82 Жыл бұрын
He wasn't the only one who made such promises, he simply popularized it with his movie-style documentaries. I remember reading science magazines in 2000 and they were already promising that all the organs, for example, would be grown in labs in 5 years, meaning in 2005.
@kensho123456
@kensho123456 Жыл бұрын
@@nikokapanen82 the bad company argument. *tut* *tut*
@nikokapanen82
@nikokapanen82 Жыл бұрын
@@kensho123456 Yes. He admitted it himself several times that he isn't that smart, he interviewed 300 top scientists and only told us what they told him.
@kensho123456
@kensho123456 Жыл бұрын
@@nikokapanen82 I think you are barking up the wrong tree. If anything I am accusing him of being TOO smart.
@JackPullen-Paradox
@JackPullen-Paradox Жыл бұрын
This an interesting conversation. But I have heard that no particle other than the Higgs boson (which may be enough) has been found by the Large Hadron collider in Europe. I'd like to know to what extent this is a true statement.
@kogarah1
@kogarah1 6 ай бұрын
That’s hilarious “unfortunately we said Higgs Boson and the Machine was cancelled lol 😂
@thebuttonfreak
@thebuttonfreak 10 ай бұрын
How can you have a Hamiltonian and no Langrangian if they are related by a Legendre transform.
@kayakMike1000
@kayakMike1000 Жыл бұрын
Kaku is a fraking joke. If any of his theoretical work us actually correct, its by pure accident.
@octaviolopes6843
@octaviolopes6843 Жыл бұрын
Hey, Brian. I loved your joke!!😊🫶
@DrBrianKeating
@DrBrianKeating Жыл бұрын
I'm glad!
@joaochainhonunes
@joaochainhonunes Жыл бұрын
Man, I loved your answer to that professor to figure out your name from your footprint. 😂
@DrBrianKeating
@DrBrianKeating Жыл бұрын
🙏 I Was a wise @$$
@borisborcic
@borisborcic Жыл бұрын
It's an interesting question, how well can we expect to perform in creative generation, an AI trained on an annotated list of historically successful competitive table games? From the likes of Go and Chess to the likes of Backgammon and Dices. At most a dozen, possibly half that. Except ML as we know it is about digesting "grass", not "chocolate"... Ok, suppose we start with the simpler task to decide on the order in which to array existing board games while educating on them all. AI should be up to the task of picking a consistent order when commanded to place some selected game either at the beginning, or in the middle, or at the end of the array of successful games all selected for good example value. Then, AI could pore over the question of how to select among all these array orderings, the one(s) best fit to welcome extension by a beneficial additional member: which in turn would count once obtained, as witness to the I in AI;)
@John-bq9jh
@John-bq9jh Жыл бұрын
As an experimentalist my self back in the seventies working with interactions between atoms. This involved atom beams where one beam containing one atom would cross another beam of atoms at 90 degrees and calculating potentials. Interesting when the velocities were just right you would notice an irregular plot. Calculating the wavelength of the atom at lambda = h/mv with the mass and velocities close the the diameter of the atom being struck one notices complete absence of the particle position being measured. Common physics says this is equivalent to interference patterns and is a quantum effect. However let’s pretend that diffraction and inference were never discovered. Then one would calculate these “bands” as the result of the forces between these atoms colliding would simply mean that the forces between them are not smooth but broken up because forces in fact are made up of discrete energy packets and simple calculations using tangent formulas. Example the famous billiard balls collision model in grade 12 physics of two billiard balls can be also represented by 2 circular boats with man A in Boat A and Man B in boat B both have 5 bowling balls at the bottom. man in in either boat one and a pile of bowling balls. So instead of actual colliding they interact by throwing and catching bowling balls. Point towards each other and as they get close man A throws one bowling ball in boat B and Boat B moves off at angle theta T1 and boat A also moves off at angle T1. Repeat and throw 2 balls and they move off at angle T2. Repeat with 3 balls and 4 balls ….. and they move off at angles T3 T4 ….. see what’s happening that smooth cross sectional now becomes stepped just like an interference patterns. So using virtual particles as transferring the force it is easily seen as to why atom beam collisions show interference patterns like light does through a single slit. Yukawa potentials easily calculates this without any ridiculous assumptions that particles or photons travel as a wave and only when there is a collision does it’s wave function collapse. After numerous arguments in the faculty club which I always won I was told I didn’t understand Schrödinger’s wave equations. Ya sure. Those damn theorists need to get their butts in a lab or outside and look through a telescope. I am convinced that all these ridiculous models from string theory, quantum gravity, many worlds theory, matrix theories…. Shows we are essentially akin to Ptolemy’s stage before Copernicus came around and showed that going from a earth cantered model to a sun centred model made pages of calculations and elaborate models of geometrical shapes just to get close to predicting the motions of the planets and Copernicus model was just a simple few lines to calculate. When I see the words dark and infinities I simply turn off. Physics should not be taking as faith was in the church view that we were the centre of the universe. Most of these cosmological theories are based mostly on faith and their proponents are its bishops and maybe the string theorist’s the Pope. Lol
@wearemany73
@wearemany73 Жыл бұрын
“Fearful host” 😆 I don’t mean this as an insult I promise but Mitchio has a way of talking that I find annoying, like the meanderings of someone profoundly confused. He gets far too much credit for his output.
@classicalmechanic8914
@classicalmechanic8914 6 ай бұрын
Membranes: experimentally not confirmed Strings: experimentally not confirmed Supersymetry: experimentally not confrmed Multiverse: experimentally not confirmed Michio:"You are just envious."
@tonymarshharveytron1970
@tonymarshharveytron1970 Жыл бұрын
Hello, you say there could be a Fith force resulting from a new patrticle. The particle you are looking for is an incredibly small negatively charged ' Monopole Particle ' called a ' Harveytron '. This particle fills every available empty space that is not an atomic nucleus, throughout the universe in a cloud. It is what makes up the ' Dark Matter '. The negative force of repulsion that is prodeced as each particle is trying to repel each other, is the ' Dar Energy ', and is the second force of ' Gravity '. There is a simple experiment that can prove the existence. If Brian and Michio are interested, I am happy to send them a copy of latest draft of my hypothesis. Kind regards, Tony Marsh.
@dawnettahodge
@dawnettahodge Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@DrBrianKeating
@DrBrianKeating Жыл бұрын
Welcome! And Thank you, for your support
@siddbastard
@siddbastard Жыл бұрын
@@DrBrianKeating 2 dollars gets a response, but comments well written and argumented get jack shit. you suck
@BarKeegan
@BarKeegan 9 ай бұрын
I liked the foot joke
@kjelladrian3205
@kjelladrian3205 Жыл бұрын
Applying for money during the cold war: "Russia!" "How much?" I love that! After the cold war: "Will we find God with your machine?" "We will find the Higgs boson!" "So now we have to sing for our supper" I love that last quote even more. Not that this situation is any good for science, but I love Michio's metaphors and at least we get plenty of science lectures to watch.
@DrBrianKeating
@DrBrianKeating Жыл бұрын
Is string theory the correct Theory of Everything?
@ohmaramusic
@ohmaramusic Жыл бұрын
No. I opt for Chris Langan's CTMU as it is really the only real contender for a theory of everything.
@Garspawnish
@Garspawnish Жыл бұрын
String theory is about as valid as multi worlds. IE. No.
@edvinboskovic9963
@edvinboskovic9963 Жыл бұрын
It's something that You have to answer, scientists, scholars. Most of the population of planet Earth is not familiar with Newton's laws, much less with Einstein's theories.
@dzikdziki2983
@dzikdziki2983 Жыл бұрын
It's one of the biggest scams on physics
@andyoates8392
@andyoates8392 Жыл бұрын
How did the muon experiment work out? Was a fifth force discovered?
@DaveMichelsen-k6w
@DaveMichelsen-k6w Жыл бұрын
not that my opinion matters to the good doctor but i would like to formally apologize to Dr Kaku. I can't really pinpoint where I acquired this opinion but I thought he was more of a popularizer and youtube scientist than a practicing, cutting edge physicist. btw I think being the former is a huge bonus to mankind so I never thought that was a bad thing. I hit ~22 min in and realized Michio is right there with all the brilliant physicists/mathematicians I listen to incessantly and comprehend sporadically :) Thanks Dr Kaku and Prof Brian.
@pygmalionsrobot1896
@pygmalionsrobot1896 Жыл бұрын
I am a big critic of ST but only because it has been presented as established fact. No it should not be abandoned, it should be studied and appreciated as a 'tentative theory" until we have some physical evidence. Lab results. Experiments.
@IndianArma
@IndianArma Жыл бұрын
Until we "have some evidence"? Lol.
@phutureproof
@phutureproof 10 ай бұрын
@@IndianArma nice fail on the quote there
@netizencapet
@netizencapet Жыл бұрын
I think Michi conflates his vague equations with the more specific findings of later researchers. Sabine brings up the constant series of revisions that string theorists had to adopt to be consistent with emerging experimental data. Then again, the conventional view of expansion and the Big Bang need to come up with all sorts of excuses and arbitrary modifications to explain why surface brightness of stars is constant with distance, why there are so many large and complex galaxies and massive black holes so many light years away that they would have to have been produced at a time when Big Bangers say galaxies couldn't have formed, so much less lithium and more helium than they predicted in certain old stars, so much smoothing in the CMB, so much more matter than predicted by Big Bang.
@SeaSaltAndFish
@SeaSaltAndFish Жыл бұрын
why such a bad recording quality???
@daffidavit
@daffidavit Жыл бұрын
At 39:20 Dr. Kaku refers to the "god of Spinoza" . This sometimes makes me recall the second pilot film of Star Trek TOS where Kirk's friend gains superior knowledge after his ESP is increased by an energy field making him god-like. While reading Spinoza, he comments that Spinoza's philosophy is "childlike".
@zaclovesschool2273
@zaclovesschool2273 Жыл бұрын
Well children are closer to the source, they are not as locked in and decided in their ways. Often children can offer wisdom we forget as we get older. Not always, but sometimes things that resonate with the a young person can be more profound than expected.
@d98ser
@d98ser Жыл бұрын
Ehh..all respect to Kaku as a mainstream presenter of physics, ideas and cosmology..probably he should stay away from AI as a subject😀 Further I doubt Edward Witten, Penrose and the late Sagan agrees with many of his ideas..He is going wild this time😂
@tofo2
@tofo2 7 ай бұрын
The trick to sound convincing is to not spend time on subjects in our reality. Because then we can check the validity. Imaginations only works where they can escape adding confusion when needed.
@GregDidier
@GregDidier Жыл бұрын
I've listened to Kaku for the last 30 years. To the uninformed people, he sounds intelligent. However in the real world, he's a nutcase. He does not stand for real Science.
@Gunni1972
@Gunni1972 Жыл бұрын
Thanks, i am glad you uploaded this so i could scientifically verify, that Michio Kaku is still off his Rockers. He shouldn't have bet his Marbles on a string. As long as he accuses others of speculations, while having no proof for multiple Universes (Multiverse), or "God Particles" himself. Or tries to flee into the numbers of hands God has.(What if Shiva had some more hands)? yeah, i know, that was childish, but so is an entity, we haven't proven the existence of. Believing is not knowing. Heck, he can't even remember in which Universe Newtons gravitational law, or Maxwells equation actually work. (Yes, measured by many methods, not in infinite universes.) To Michio Kaku, PERCEPTION is THE UNIVERSE (What dimension?- Touch, Sight, Hearing, Smell and Taste? Hey, i found some Dimensions, where's my Nobel?) Let me make it clear that a Law, that OUTLAWS MURDER period. Is meant to Outlaw ALL VARIATIONS OF MURDER. just as a law of Physics allows no deviation from it. Masses attract other masses. And Electromagnetic charges support or hinder that. But the Masses still attract. it is just another force between them, which has nothing to do with the masses themselves. Or actual Particle Physics. It's about Energy exchange (conservation of energy) Once a particle is hit with enough Energy, it carries it further. Or disperses it, until it reaches Entropy. And the AMOUNT of Dark Matter and/or Dark energy that was calculated (70%) pretty much contradicts everything we can observe in the Universe. Non-charged particles that collide with other non-charged particles or actual matter do not automatically create a flash (or we could see those collisions as a halo around planets, moons and/or other celestial objects.) Also, collisions are transfer of energy, (according to Einstein). We have expanding and contracting forces. Expanding ones are easier to measure, because they turn visible after a certain wavelength. Contracting forces are becoming smaller and smaller, creating Vacuum. So my question is then: if the Universe is expanding, how much contracting force could it be? None? And BTW ALL the measurment units we apply, WE have made up. And declared a Standard. "The second [...] is defined by taking the fixed numerical value of the caesium frequency, ΔνCs, the unperturbed ground-state hyperfine transition frequency of the caesium 133 atom, to be 9192631770 when expressed in the unit Hz, which is equal to s−1.[1]" See, Wikipedia did my Homework.
@daveyhansen
@daveyhansen Жыл бұрын
I disagree. Dogs know we are not dogs. I have lived by myself with a dog for the past 12 years. She always barks at other dogs, but never at humans. Explain that if you can.
@ebog4841
@ebog4841 Жыл бұрын
BAHAHAHAHA WHAT MICHIO KAKU THE NEXT EINSTEIN??????????????????????????????????? BRUH BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
@bentationfunkiloglio
@bentationfunkiloglio Жыл бұрын
I always enjoy MK’s interviews. Long format podcasts like this one spectacularly showcase two of his most admirable qualities. 1. Passion and talent for exporting cosmological theories and mathematics to the layman-verse. 2. His formidable rhetorical prowess. He is the Muhammad Ali of scientific debate. He masterfully ducked and weaved past the single most challenging question in BK’s podcast, i.e., research constraining the number of physical dimensions to 3!
@DrDeuteron
@DrDeuteron Жыл бұрын
Idk about rhetoric. He opened with an adjective where an adverb was called for, and blew the preposition.
@0neIntangible
@0neIntangible Жыл бұрын
@@DrDeuteron... and also remember to never, ever leave your participles dangling... obligatory lol.
@DrDeuteron
@DrDeuteron Жыл бұрын
@@0neIntangible you know what also dangles, for which you must 👀 Deez 🥜
@matteogirelli1023
@matteogirelli1023 Жыл бұрын
He's full of s*it. Remove your blinders
@jostler5534
@jostler5534 Жыл бұрын
He is an actor...
@Epoch11
@Epoch11 Жыл бұрын
How do we know that an alien on the other side of the Galaxy is riding the same equation? What is mathematics is based on the computation done by a particular structure or nervous system ? What if a brain made out of silicone and structure differently approaches mathematics in a different manner question mark why are we so sure that our way of processing the physical universe isn't unique? What if alien equations have a much different structure and perhaps even show different characteristics of the universe because of the sense organs and metaphysical properties of their physical forms? These are questions I would love to know the answers to even on some basic level.
@phutureproof
@phutureproof 10 ай бұрын
Did you really type out question mark? exclamation mark
@jacquacooper
@jacquacooper Ай бұрын
Broooo the science community has never been so tantalizing lol…but for real though…scientists are probably about to be pop culture.
@captain_context9991
@captain_context9991 Жыл бұрын
Michio Kaku went off the rails yeeears ago. With his wild claims and crazy conspiracies.
@eltoro4814
@eltoro4814 Жыл бұрын
I honestly couldn’t focus on this conversation because of the audio distortion on Michio Kaku 😔
@dr_IkjyotSinghKohli
@dr_IkjyotSinghKohli Жыл бұрын
The problem with critiquing String Theory is that people ignore that it was developed in the same spirit as of all of the solutions of Einstein's field equations. Schwarzschild, Einstein, deSitter, Friedmann, LeMaitre, Robertson, Walker, etc... all came up with solutions of the field equations that they never thought would be tested. In the spirit of shameless self-promotion :), my research was on the Bianchi cosmologies, and I published several results with colleagues in this area, but these also have not been (and probably will not be) tested in my lifetime. Even with respect to inflation, most cosmologists who "believe" in it have no experimental justification for picking the form of the inflaton potential that they do, and why they always evolve the KG equation in a flat/homogenous/isotropic spacetime. String theory is also a theoretical result in which folks are trying to answer the ultimate question: can gravity and QM be unified? It is exciting that they can be theoretically, in the same way Kaluza and Klein unified gravity and E&M in 5 dimensions (for which most people also believe but for which has no experimental evidence).
@pokerlopher
@pokerlopher Жыл бұрын
I have had it with Brian Keating and all these damn reposts. Literally nothing he puts out is original fresh content.
@fullyawakened
@fullyawakened Жыл бұрын
This show is slipping off the edge of the cliff recently
@siddbastard
@siddbastard Жыл бұрын
you think ? what gave it away ? the 50 years of stagnation in the field or kaku being a rambling madmen ? maybe the 50 minutes of yapping about the music of the spheres ?
@wulphstein
@wulphstein Жыл бұрын
What are dimensions made of? How are physics constants built into them?
@Perrydog101
@Perrydog101 Жыл бұрын
He wrote an extremely insightful book supporting Fermi's Paradox. Importantly, it grounded me against outlandishly foolish claims concerning extraterrestrials. No Dyson spheres detected, determined not enough energy to bend space. We're alone .
@user-rx5dh4le5x
@user-rx5dh4le5x Жыл бұрын
So no Dyson spheres therefore no aliens? I just wonder, how many Dyson spheres have we humans created?
@geraldmansfield2631
@geraldmansfield2631 Жыл бұрын
OK then the first time I saw a B1B bomber disappear was in 2021. Our Airforce has this now.
Does beauty deceive physics? | Michio Kaku, Sabine Hossenfelder, Max Tegmark, Juan Maldacena
53:15
Eric Weinstein & Stephen Wolfram: Theories of Everything (357)
1:50:13
Dr Brian Keating
Рет қаралды 245 М.
Who is More Stupid? #tiktok #sigmagirl #funny
0:27
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Michio Kaku | Quantum Supremacy | Talks at Google
1:02:12
Talks at Google
Рет қаралды 763 М.
Should we abandon the multiverse theory? | Sabine Hossenfelder, Roger Penrose, Michio Kaku
53:43
The Institute of Art and Ideas
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
The Elegant Universe: Brian Greene in Conversation with Janna Levin
1:06:12
Dr. Michio Kaku Predicted ChatGPT and the Next Wave of AI Years Ago in Stunning Lecture
54:18
Feedzai | Fraud and Financial Crime
Рет қаралды 305 М.
What is Time? Stephen Wolfram’s Groundbreaking New Theory
1:32:11
Dr Brian Keating
Рет қаралды 367 М.
String Theory, Quantum Gravity and Black Holes (Or, Are We Holograms?)
1:27:56
World Science Festival
Рет қаралды 254 М.
Dr. Michio Kaku: The God Equation
1:06:10
Commonwealth Club World Affairs (CCWA)
Рет қаралды 607 М.
Stephen Wolfram | My Discovery Changes Everything
1:37:04
Dr Brian Keating
Рет қаралды 507 М.
The secrets of Einstein's unknown equation - with Sean Carroll
53:59
The Royal Institution
Рет қаралды 834 М.