Michio Kaku | Quantum Supremacy | Talks at Google

Professor of physics, cofounder of string field theory, and author, Dr. Michio Kaku, joins us to discuss his book Quantum Supremacy: How the Quantum Computer Revolution Will Change Everything, an exhilarating tour of humanity’s next great technological achievement-quantum computing-which may eventually illuminate the deepest mysteries of science and solve some of humanity’s biggest problems, like global warming, world hunger, and incurable disease.
Get the book here: goo.gle/3UA8Vcn.
Dr. Michio Kaku is a professor of physics at the City University of New York and the author of several widely acclaimed science books, including Hyperspace, Beyond Einstein, Physics of the Impossible, and Physics of the Future. He is the science correspondent for CBS’s This Morning and host of the radio programs Science Fantastic and Explorations in Science.
Moderated by Mark Kropf.

[@williamcarr459]

I love good ole Michio! He does a great job making science fun for all us folk! He’s a national treasure! Thanks Dr. K.

[@osirisakkebala6751]

Two places at sa.e time is not that anlusionary reflection more sothana physicaltranportation osiris

[@santosocanas7730]

​@@osirisakkebala67515 🎉,4mo4 fzl Eject 5.9os,5 tmx444fgm9.gj gr g 😮gr t s😮?.

[@Maverick5866]

I wish I had a grandfather like Michio Kaku. I could listen to him lecturing all day long. I read "The Future of Mind" last year and I'm excited to read his latest "Quantum Supremacy".

[@2liter8]

I'd like to be a janitor in the building where he works. What you could overhear just hanging out.

[@PHAD-rf3oe]

You would listen to him when he would babble around without explaining the details of how it works? He neded half the talk to go into computer prehistory and fill the other half with suppositions without explaining the workings if a quantum computer.

[@davrasyavuz]

B. SZ 3:49 3:49 3:49

[@davrasyavuz]

❤😂

[@davrasyavuz]

@@2liter8A asAaSx ZXC VB N 3:49 3:49 a M❤🥎🕑🀄️🎴🕔

[@crazygrandma]

I wish Michio Kaku was my Math teacher a long time ago. He explains things so well!

[@talkdatalk1002]

i’m going

[@WallStreetPirate]

me too.

[@michael-4k4000]

Michio is a master of disaster

[@user-yv4gg7jb2f]

lol df

[@EddoRats]

Why do none of these famous celebrity Physisists show of by applying their fancy equations to the 9/11 disaster in New York in 2001? Let me refresh your minds with my proof based on high school level energy equations. Epotential = Ekinetic remember? So Mgh = 0.5MV^2. V=52/m/s(terminal velocity of free falling objects) M= nonrelevant g =9.81m/s^2 Calculate h = 137.81m Thats the free space h underneath plane impact location that is needed for the upper tower part to reach free fall speed. But underneath the impact locations In the Towers there was no free space. There were 40 floors who should have resisted free fall. How did this magic trick happen celebrity physists ????????? Or are you'll also full of shit!!

[@user-hj1mk7zy6t]

Just blows my mind! I'm 75 years old and I am so excited about multi-universes and string theory. I have had experiences which have shown me that we don't die and I'm looking forward to the big adventure(s) beyond this existence. I am hoping the best for humanity. Love is all there is. Thanks for this lecture, it was fascinating;

[@JeffJohnson_123]

First time I watched 1 hr + lecture without skipping anything like full on. Just wow

[@S1ll]

fr, it's crazy interesting

[@TheStringBreaker]

*I was captivated by Michio Kaku's show on the Discovery Channel in middle school, and I remain a fan to this day. He never fails to impress.*

[@gotmilk91]

Michio Kaku explains the unexplainable in the most elementary possible ways, and in a longer session like this, he really shines with myriad examples that most will fail to understand bcz they can't sit thru things "too elementary" for them 😮

[@brentsobol5076]

Lp 50:24

[@brentsobol5076]

2 52:50 ❤7 6th

[@brentsobol5076]

😂😂😍🤗

[@brentsobol5076]

❤ 53:22 😂

[@muhammad1502]

no he doesn’t-go take a Physics class and find out how much of a charlatan this guy is.

[@famousbangla7689]

Humble Thanks to Talks at Google ! You meet us someone very special Dr. Kaku. We found everything like a filmed reel in our fantasy and our mind.

[@A.RAHIM.]

Michio deserves another Nobel Prize for the way he explains it!

[@ryanskynet6423]

He hasn’t won one. String theory is bull shit.

[@gauranshbansal]

what do you mean by another? He never won a Nobel prize but I second you on that.

[@ninahasacomputer]

Except he's often wrong about how quantum computing actually works, or what it might be able to do. I know this because I'm a physics engineer in quantum computing. No Nobel prize for popularists with factual errors sadly.

[@gauranshbansal]

@@ninahasacomputer Could you please tell me what's wrong with what he says about the future of quantum computing?

[@ninahasacomputer]

​@@gauranshbansalYou can google "physicist reviews Michio Kaku" for a lot of examples. I work in this industry every day, and all my colleagues think Kaku has lost the plot, and his book is either just sadly misguided or knowingly makes up a lot of things to sell to a general audience.

[@re8et355]

Michio is such a prysm inspiration to all of us who still believe in the evolution of the string theory.

[@AnitaToutikian]

If you had a bad day, just listen to this!

[@fernandocortes1187]

1:30 is there ? 6:00 computer 2000 years old?! 22:20 Quantum computer and the future of economy 24:40 Acordiones futuristas 29:00 chemistry without chemicals

[@changbeerbeer]

I wish the technology to extend Mr Michio Kanu life was available now! Great smart guy that’s always great to listen to! 👌❤

[@tomasinacovell4293]

He's just a talk-show, neoliberal. He use to say that FTL wasn't possible with warp engines making it impossible to travel to the stars and for "aliens" to come here, that is before everyone was talking about the Alcubierre Drive and then he had to ride that too, he's just as much a suppressor as he is a booster and his toilet is after 200 years of doing with a lab test.

[@tinypurplefishesrunlaughin8052]

Or the opposite, meaning his existence stunts progress.

[@-ross3778]

I honestly don't know how you could say that after listening to the guy spend an hour saying practically *_nothing_*_ of substance._ Were you and I watching different lectures?

[@changbeerbeer]

@@-ross3778 it’s not about one video, this guy has done so much! But I guess easy to hate from your armchair! 🙈

[@tomasinacovell4293]

@@-ross3778 Excellent, Truth, I know just how you feel! :) He's just a talk-show, neoliberal. He use to say that FTL wasn't possible with warp engines making it impossible to travel to the stars and for "aliens" to come here, that is before everyone was talking about the Alcubierre Drive and then he had to ride that too, he's just as much a suppressor as he is a booster and his toilet is after 200 years of doing with a lab test.

[@vera98021]

I a simple individual enjoyed this presentation immensely!!

[@3dvfx792]

Dr.Kaku's words blow my mind, the future ahead is unbelievable!!

[@lagillas]

sadly he is very old, he has dementia, i think since 2010 he started to develop dementia, rn, he's sadly, very out of this world.

[@tomasinacovell4293]

@@lagillas Kaku likes to subvert the USA with the H-1B program too! I wish I could see how his money really flows. He's just a talk-show, neoliberal. He use to say that FTL wasn't possible with warp engines making it impossible to travel to the stars and for "aliens" to come here, that is before everyone was talking about the Alcubierre Drive and then he had to ride that too, he's just as much a suppressor as he is a booster and his toilet is after 200 years of doing with a lab test.

[@vincelefaive5218]

We are beyond fortunate to have a mind like Dr K's out there working for us every day.

[@lazarusblackwell6988]

Progress always comes at a price but people who are pushing the progress dont really care about the negative impact on society. Would any of us really ignore and reject progress because it comes at a price? Thats the question a lot should be asking.

[@sincereflowers3218]

Human beings are organic lifeforms bound by the processes they evolved to satiate. The version of us that will dominate space, if we do not destroy ourselves first, will think of us the way we think of Neanderthals and early Homosapiens. As barely conscious animals.

[@sbastos01]

Great speaker. He dances with the results... Love to deep dive into a simple example how... Is it by parallel processing... ?

[@michaelcuellar6600]

Wowwwwww yall be glad this man just basically read his newest book in front of you!

[@dezerter9200]

Enigma code was cracked by Marian Rajewski .During a meeting in Pyry, near Warsaw, in July 1939, Rejewski and his colleagues demonstrated how to crack the machine and gave each allied side a replica. This allowed Alan Turing to continue their work at Bletchley Park.

[@profbri.02]

I did not know that. Thank you. I love learning stuff. Peace 🙏

[@derp8575]

Why do you believe it?@@profbri.02

[@Pvilchez1188]

Exactly! Polish mathematicians deserve a great deal of credit for this breakthrough. Unsure why Historians, including Michiu Kaku here are not even mentioning Marian. Ridiculous!

[@QuantumSquirrel]

hard to sit through an entire lecture about quantum computers without spending time talking about how they work, which is very fascinating. This lecture was about use cases for a quantum computer, not the science behind it. but a lot of people seem to like the talk which is good

[@olldomu5790]

the use cases are the hard bit to understand without such a lecture

[@hyderalihimmathi1811]

Michio Kaku prepares his keynote speech with Hollywood-style drama to appeal to the ignorant masses, because he knows that quantum physics is a dull topic and that most people only care about its practical implications for humanity. However, it's important to note that Michio Kaku is an accomplished physicist and science communicator who has dedicated his career to making complex scientific concepts more accessible to the general public. Quantum physics, while intricate and challenging, has far-reaching implications for various fields and our understanding of the universe. While it is true that practical applications of quantum physics often capture people's attention, it does not mean that the subject itself is dull or uninteresting. Many individuals, including scientists and enthusiasts, find the fundamental principles and concepts of quantum physics fascinating. Michio Kaku's engaging presentation style, which may include elements of drama and storytelling, is aimed at captivating his audience and sparking their curiosity. By employing relatable analogies, thought experiments, and examples from popular culture, he strives to convey complex ideas in an approachable manner. It's worth noting that presenting scientific information in an engaging way does not imply that the audience is ignorant or incapable of understanding the subject matter. On the contrary, effective science communication aims to inspire and educate a diverse range of individuals, fostering interest and promoting scientific literacy. While different people may have different preferences for how scientific information is presented, it is important to recognize the value of efforts made by scientists like Michio Kaku to bridge the gap between complex scientific concepts and the general public. Michio Kaku is a world-renowned physicist and popularizer of science. He is known for his ability to explain complex scientific concepts in a way that is both understandable and exciting. In his upcoming keynote speech, Kaku will be talking about quantum physics. He knows that this is a topic that can be difficult to understand, and that many people find it boring. However, he also knows that quantum physics is essential to understanding the universe, and that it has the potential to revolutionize many aspects of our lives. Kaku has decided to prepare his speech with Hollywood-style drama in order to appeal to the ignorant masses. He knows that most people only care about the practical implications of quantum physics for humanity, and he wants to make sure that his speech is both informative and entertaining. Kaku will start his speech by talking about the history of quantum physics. He will tell stories about the great scientists who have made discoveries in this field, and he will explain some of the strange and wonderful things that quantum physics can explain. Then, Kaku will get into the practical implications of quantum physics. He will talk about how quantum physics is being used to develop new technologies, such as quantum computers and quantum sensors. He will also talk about how quantum physics could revolutionize medicine, energy, and transportation. Kaku will use a variety of visual aids and dramatic techniques to make his speech more exciting. He will show videos of quantum experiments, and he will use music and sound effects to create a sense of suspense. He will also use humor and personal anecdotes to keep the audience engaged. Kaku knows that his speech will not be everyone's cup of tea. However, he believes that it is important to make quantum physics accessible to a wider audience. He hopes that his speech will inspire people to learn more about this fascinating subject, and that it will help to change the way that people think about quantum physics. On the day of the speech, Kaku is nervous but excited. He knows that this is a important opportunity to communicate the importance of quantum physics to a wide audience. He takes a deep breath and starts his speech. The speech is a success. The audience is captivated by Kaku's stories and his passion for quantum physics. They learn about the strange and wonderful world of quantum physics, and they are excited about the possibilities that it holds. Kaku's speech is a reminder that even the most complex subjects can be made understandable and exciting with the right presentation. It is also a reminder that the practical implications of quantum physics are vast and far-reaching. Quantum physics is not just a subject for scientists and engineers. It is a subject that has the potential to change the world.

[@hyderalihimmathi1811]

It's a talk by Michio Kaku about the practical implications of quantum physics. He talks about how quantum physics is being used to develop new technologies, such as quantum computers and quantum sensors. He also talks about how quantum physics could revolutionize medicine, energy, and transportation. Kaku does a great job of explaining complex scientific concepts in a way that is both understandable and exciting. He uses humour and personal anecdotes to keep the audience engaged, and he shows videos of quantum experiments to illustrate his points. I think this is a great video for anyone interested in learning more about the practical implications of quantum physics. It's informative and entertaining, and it gives you a good overview of the potential of this field. Here are some of the practical implications of quantum physics that Kaku discusses in the video: * Quantum computers: Quantum computers are a type of computer that uses the principles of quantum mechanics to perform calculations. They are much faster than traditional computers, and they have the potential to revolutionize many industries, such as cryptography, drug discovery, and financial modelling. * Quantum sensors: Quantum sensors are devices that use the principles of quantum mechanics to measure physical properties. They are much more sensitive than traditional sensors, and they have the potential to revolutionize many industries, such as medical diagnostics and environmental monitoring. * Quantum communication: Quantum communication is a type of communication that uses the principles of quantum mechanics to transmit information. It is much more secure than traditional communication, and it has the potential to revolutionize the way we communicate. Kaku also discusses some of the challenges that need to be overcome before quantum physics can be fully realized. These challenges include the development of new materials, the miniaturization of quantum devices, and the control of quantum systems. However, Kaku is optimistic about the future of quantum physics. He believes that these challenges can be overcome and that quantum physics has the potential to change the world. Indeed, Kaku is known for his ability to explain complex scientific concepts in an accessible and engaging manner. The topics you mentioned, such as quantum computers, quantum sensors, and quantum communication, are indeed some of the key areas where quantum physics is being applied. Quantum computers have the potential to solve certain types of problems much faster than classical computers by harnessing the power of quantum superposition and entanglement. They could revolutionize fields such as cryptography, optimization, and simulation, enabling breakthroughs in areas like drug discovery and material science. Quantum sensors leverage the sensitivity of quantum systems to detect and measure physical quantities with high precision. They could enhance medical diagnostics by detecting diseases at an early stage or provide more accurate environmental monitoring for pollution levels, for example. Quantum communication, which relies on the principles of quantum mechanics, offers enhanced security in transmitting information. Quantum key distribution, for instance, allows for secure communication by encoding information in the properties of quantum particles, making it virtually impossible to intercept without detection. While there are challenges to overcome, as you mentioned, the field of quantum physics continues to advance. Researchers are working on developing new materials and improving the control and miniaturization of quantum devices. Progress in these areas could unlock the full potential of quantum technologies and pave the way for transformative advancements. Overall, understanding the practical implications of quantum physics is important as it provides insights into the potential future applications of this fascinating field. It's an area of ongoing research and innovation, and its impact on various industries holds great promise for the future.

[@zahm2011]

TLDR

[@derp8575]

You didn't miss much. The OP was shilling for Kaku. @@zahm2011

[@justmeisthatu9069]

I just for the life of me can't figure out why people don't point out the obvious doesn't quantum physics prove there's a creator of all of this I don't care what you call it. But instead they go off on the most ridiculous million-dollar word campaign to make it sound also complicated that nobody even thinks to look into it because it's designed to look like it's meant for geniuses only to understand. Quantum physics the string theory the split test I mean science is only discovering things that are already here so like I said doesn't science prove over and over again that there is a Divine Creator why is that so hard understand

[@JonPChamberlain]

You must think you're very clever, "writing" a very obviously AI-generated reply.

[@tiffsaver]

I used to like Dr. Kaku, but of late all he does is continually hawk his new and unending books, without EVER addressing the obvious negatives facing our world today, things like the clear and obvious dangers of A.I., and of it's short and long-term effects. In fact, you will NEVER catch him discussing just how we can get out of our CURRENT mess, only of his dreams of a glorious future created by high technology. The fact is, simply by viewing the current rate of ecosystem degradation by human beings, we actually have very little time on the geological clock to even guarantee that we'll even be around to see the miraculous future visions Dr. Kaku so enthusiastically promotes.

[@lilith_soph]

or maybe A I is not the problem but the overpopulation is?

[@tiffsaver]

@@lilith_soph Overpopulation is a major problem. But AI is something entirely different. It took millions of years for humans to evolve to this point, but it will only take weeks, months, or years for computers to evolve, eventually completely overtaking human intelligence as we speak.

[@brankogredelj6153]

When there'll be a collaboration between "all the major players of the sillicon valley", and not "a race" (for what trivial pursuit? prestige, money, dominance?; we're still hardly a step above a dog's level of consciousness) then I'll be optimistic about the future of human kind

[@jeffbguarino]

From the point of view of the electron in the double slit experiment, the whole universe has become a wave and the electron does not see a double slit. It may see the two slits superimpose into one slit. Then an instant later the detector screen pops up from nowhere and the electron collides with the screen.

[@josephbohme7917]

Our life is not governed not by intelligence but freedom to make any choice without fear and do things with a purpose.

[@kaoskryst6688]

Would have been nice for more questions. 😢 Still love hearing him talk and explain things. my number one search is michio kaku.

[@mervemeran8962]

I now believe that the past tribes and communities were different from the present and had superior scientific and even metaphysical-physical knowledge designed with a fine mind.

[@nickkinny4715]

I like most video to watch in KZbin is Dr. Michio kaku explanation

[@pranavmarla]

Brilliantly explained.

[@davidwalker5054]

I think understanding the quantum realm at a fundamental level is beyond the limit of our brains capability. Common sense and intuition closing our minds to it's true nature

[@dottedrhino]

Mister Kaku won me a bit for quantum computing with this video.

[@musiqueetmontagne]

What a fantastic talk and session. Thank you so much for this...

[@bmebri1]

Kaku is always over the top.

[@gocybertruck8189]

Professor Michio’s talk is awesome and right on.

[@tomasinacovell4293]

He like to subvert the USA with the H-1B program too!

[@VienNguyenlam]

Everything has good and bad sides. But the strong development of quantum computers will benefit humanity much more.

[@danielcooper2382]

Didn't Richard Feynman win the Nobel prize (physics) in 1965 for the quantum computer? That paper is an excellent read.

[@danielcooper2382]

Rossi said his patented device (2015) can produce electricity for $0.01/kWh, which, for this analysis, I will assume is true. However, he did not factor in the cost of distribution, which is currently no less than $0.05/kWh and considering needed infrastructure improvements to incorporate his devices into the grid, $0.10/kWh. Since the Chinese currently deliver electricity to their businesses for $0.05/kWh, retail, and have plans to do so for the next 40 years with the same tried and true coal fired electricity generation plants, and Rossi sold them the rights to his device (for manufacture and distribution in China) for $100 million, any means of producing electricity that utilizes the same central distribution system (the grid) will fail (be non-competitive). If any candidate chooses to jump on board the Make America Great bandwagon, I suggest that they do so with a more realistic financial prospectus.

[@dennisclass]

@@danielcooper2382 "After the Army funded Rossi's research, it learned that Rossi's devices could produce only 1 Watt of power." New Energy Times 2016

[@danielcooper2382]

@@dennisclass NOT the point. Implementation of any proposed ZPE (zero point energy) generator, like Rossi's, that must utilize the Grid (central distribution of electricity system) is doomed to fail because it, no matter how good the inventor claims it is (Rossi claims $0.01/kWh), arguendo (for the sake of argument we presume what he says is true), cannot compete with China's current and proposed means (coal fired plants) of producing electricity; $0.05/kWh retail (to the end commercial consumer). That's because using the Grid costs no less than $0.10 kWh. If your proposed electricity generation device (solar; wind; wave; ZPE; whatever) cannot be installed in a house or in a commercial building (unsubsidized) and produce electricity for everything therein (including all heating and cooling) for considerably less than $0.05/kWh, say, less than or equal to $0.01/kWh, implementing it, throughout the United States, will only cause the further financial ruin of the United States. It is NOT possible to "make America great" by proposing a means of producing electricity that will do that; cause further financial ruin of the United States. Hence, if you are a candidate for public office, running on the "make American great" promise, and don't have such an economically feasible means of producing electricity, you are committing mass fraud upon the citizens of the United States. By omission, if you are a candidate, running for public office, that is NOT proposing to save the United States from peaceful take over by the Chinese (via lawful business), then you are also committing mass fraud upon the citizens of the United States.

[@user-kh7kx9en9l]

Big props to Google for promoting a talk with one of my favorite pseudoscientists

[@buttmuddbrooks]

His dry delivery of jokes is fantastic.

[@blondeeagles]

🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

[@LeyDing-yo5sd]

❤❤❤I Ley Ding learning so much from the doctor Micho kaku! 😅 Everything 😍 is possible 🙏 if you use your mind!

[@rd264]

but how?

[@neophytefarmer9646]

This is an excellent piece of information that provides valuable insights and knowledge.

[@xgnglint6466]

Professor enjoyed your lecture. Everything is possible. If we say welcome to it. 1% logical 1% brain cells. We get everything we want. Good job Professor. Thank you for everything. Mother Nature has no physical body, but is pure energy. Therefore, it can be any place and you are aware of this.

[@kimboslice69544]

Thanks much!! Eager to hear more 😃 6-19-23 5:45 pm pacific

[@TheYoga1212]

Interesting Dr Kaku presentation, hope Quantum computers are made and helping human beings

[@claragabbert-fh1uu]

Transmutes? You might say that. I usually think of it as "processes". Others regard it as "controls by logic". All together, it amounts to being that a quantum computer works by talking to itself; it arrives at answer BY the logic that we put into it in design of it's process, called an "algorithm"; ancients called it a song or a tune. The process is composed in relational definitions and is sequenced essentially by words that we use; we have already evolved into those words logic useful to us in thinking. We have represented that logic as alphabetic characters and punctuations and sentence syntax of word reference by function. So really, the quantum computer mimics our use of logic, but it uses signals of quantum bubble presence or collapse as its characters, and it does so very fast. In fact, by using words as titles for subroutines and functions, like titles of books, the computer, just like us, can create new dimensions in information processing, leaping far ahead in time to the answer because it can figure out how the answer behaves from any attempt that it figures out; instead of only finding an answer to a question as we ask it, it can find the answer to an easier question and then from there figure out what the answer is by changing to a more complicated question. So you see, the quantum computer is a language computer that works because Man has discovered logic and put logic into Man's languages; Man discovered logic BY paying attention to, remembering and considering God in all that Man did, over a VERY long time. The Universe taught God's logic to Man, who put it into language, then translated it into signals, notes and numbers that a computer could work with. Then we downsized the computer processor to qubit size (very few atoms at a time, as a bump on a chip) and downsized the "clock" to 1 or two atoms for VERY fast speed. The result was QUANTUM COMPUTER. Now you understand HOW it works, WHY it works, and HOW it came to be that way. It is easy to comprehend (get the general picture of). BUT, when you get down to atomic scale with electrons, simple things become VERY inordinately complicated, and nothing is obvious anymore without being proven. But because the speed increases so much, you can resolve the proofs against complications and still get the answer blazingly faster than if you yourself had to figure it out. This is a compliment, but you might think of it as talking to a (speed talking) South American or a Hindu or East Indian; such old societies have been talking about complex, ancient problems for so long they evolved everyday languages that really "cut to the chase". Every time I think about it, I am amazed and astonished at how BRILLIANT! ancient ancestral cultures were, especially compared to today.

[@sunchis717]

If someone doesn't give interest in "Quantum levels" in future for the purpose in the workplace then what will be the alternatives and how is it going to impact densely populated countries? Thank you for the video and conversation.

[@henriquetamashiro2762]

i'm from Brasil, i'm always watching all his shows!!

[@mcfrenchfry2196]

I love Brilliant people, especially the Ones from the Past.

[@user-mm7qb7pf4e]

Nature uses flow, creation organizes that flow and matter begins

[@kesodabul]

His last statement, he meant that!

[@abdulaibari9099]

Not be lazy to learn,always improving, what I do because knowledge is power. 😅

[@DataChiller]

hey Google, thanks for sharing such inspiring interviews with broader audience.

[@claragabbert-fh1uu]

Yes! I've explained how a quantum computer is like an atomic, electronic musical steel drum "computer". Now you know HOW it works. Let me explain WHY it works. So, you know that morse code communicates by short sequences of 2 characters (dots & dashes); this is just "binary" code based on 0 & 1. But also, a xylophone can compose meanings of signal in 2 ways: 1) by sequences of "lettered' notes that we are familiar with by assigning a letter to them. With this we can build words that we are already familiar with based upon the number of notes per measure of music (or cycle of computer system time). This is like the individual signals if quantum entanglement bubbles "measured" when they either collapse or are felt by the rim of the qubit. Or, 2) we can compose a tune as a sequence of note signals, and assign it to a word we already know, like the Title or Chorus of a song. This lets us compose subroutines faster by sets of words that we recall just from the title alone. This is like the path, algorithm or song/tune of the computer qubits "arrangement". So by binary we can represent numbers (or anything), and by signals of bubbles or their collapse we can compose words, phrases, sentences, paragraphs, stories subroutines. Now, resolving the answer becomes much like you interpretively reading a book. The computer does much the same, interpreting words as subroutines by manipulations of logic. The final answer is a composite signal that must be interpreted in the context of these definitions of signals, even like smoke signals. So a computer CAN think because it can be enabled to talk with words that we think with, as a propagation of AI into the language ... kind of like "Trick or Treat". Just watch out for the noise and the "dog doo" of power supply spikes .n.U.

[@umashika5155]

Regarding Bell's inequality, is it not a mistake to set S between -2 and 2? As a basis for this, it is assumed that this world is not a three-dimensional space, but has the possibility of being more multidimensional. When an object in a multidimensional space is replaced with a lower dimension, for example, when an object in a three-dimensional space is replaced with a two-dimensional plane, the parts that are not in contact with the two-dimensional plane exist as shadows. Have you ever found out that what you thought was 2D is actually a 3D shadow? In that case, S needs to consider the invisible dimension.

[@MangthangHaokip2024]

Lots of info and need to watch more than one times 👍🏻

[@urimtefiki226]

I am reading teh 20 th book, it was good that i didnt inturrupt my learning 3 years ago, you were helping me a lot with quatum extra chromosome.

[@jollymess1]

Awesome interview with genius Dr. Michio Kaku.

[@tonyfernandes2342]

Professor, the "Mediterranean" is not an ocean; it is a sea! Thank you!

[@Robin-ou1gg]

39:10 finally i have use for this information, thank you school 🙏🏻

[@KunalUniverse-ri3ws]

its great to watch and attend your such profound diatomic lecture.

[@davidl6757]

Love it!!! Here we go……. Thrilling to be at the beginning of communication…

[@jeffjenkins7979]

I now have, at least a cursory understanding of quantum computing. You are correct concerning politicians, self interest will ruin progress. But great power needs a quantum computer constitution. No joke.

[@natalia001]

11:30 as same as polish people who decoded the first enigma what helped Turing with the second one...

[@kflashcarr888]

Such a great orator.

[@MrNomad123]

The Host, seemed rushed, while Kaku seemed chill, like he could have stuck around for at least another 20-30 minutes answering questions, with no problems. Host seemed uptight, for no reason, as if the Host was ‘worried’ that Kaku would become angry for being held longer, than ‘expected’. It was rather odd. But pretty nice presentation and overall talk.

[@tomasinacovell4293]

Kaku likes to subvert the USA with the H-1B program too!

[@elledemain6646]

This is a revelation. Thank you so much for this video

[@makelife9661]

My voice is during a group call very quantum. I am at different places at the same time. This is called "Quantum Voice".

[@pgiulan]

Very interesting comment about the Apple logo as a symbol. I've always wondered about it and feel it has multiple meanings. I'd assert another one is the forbidden fruit. Nonetheless, a genius representation.

[@FrancisTSYu]

It is a pleasure to inform you that my book on “Introduction to Physically Realizable Physics” has been published by KDP with a paper bound book, which can be found on Amazon. I anticipate this book will change the dynamics of our modern physics.

[@EnigmaticStatic6]

Absolutely astonishing. I loved this lecture wow.

[@dan61131]

to measure or calculate through quantum physics always has a "point of origin" to work. then it can direct to continuous circular round motion to any point of distance.

[@ilifeletitovo7723]

A dramatic enlightening presentation!

[@arnaudjean1159]

Get A.I. to resolve how to improve the alignment of mirrors. For example a circular fractal pattern of atomic scale mirrors will considerably reduce the size and increase the power

[@MrCirorockert]

Always a inspiring and clear thoughts from him. Amazing Dr. Michiu Kaku. Love your books. You Will be mentioned thousand years ahead. 0/ Thank you Google Talks

[@reinduhr]

Even if string theory fails, yeah sure we love Michio =3

[@MrCirorockert]

@@reinduhr Indeed , my fella. Now is study more about M Theory and look beyond for Worm Holes, Quantum mecanics and WarpDrive

[@MyKharli]

He popularizes pseudo science and is an unashamed bookseller first and foremost . Avoid .

[@reinduhr]

@@MyKharli You go and avoid him buddy. Let other people think for themselves, please

[@reinduhr]

@@MyKharli Wait, you want to avoid Michio yet you came here for a video he is in? You got a complicated life, don't ya? ;)

[@arturasstatkus8613]

Thank You,Dear Sirs.

[@geraldterencio8635]

so that must be the dejavu thing, when the frequency fluctuates and we get a glimpse of a parallel universe haha mind boggling!!!

[@frankjohnson123]

I think it's important to point out that a classical computer CAN do everything a quantum computer can do because it can simulate a quantum computer. The problem is that it would require exponentially more memory and/or time to do so, so certain problems become totally impractical to compute classically.

[@ricardofiguerroa1153]

Me gustaría hacerle una pregunta,y que sea el Dr quien me la conteste,y si consideramos a la gravedad como un fluido,con nosotros dentro,como afectaría esto a las teorías que mencionan siempre al espacio tiempo juntos.saludos desde República Dominicana.

[@davidl6757]

Love to understand the principle conception with quantum theory and computers

[@Vejur9000]

Michio, is a master.

[@LWJCarroll]

14:51 but it produces fractal patterns, coastlines, flower rosettes etc Which digital can create as well??? Laurie NZ. 😊😊😊😊

[@ThomasButryn]

Great lecture. Thank you

[@LarrySerflaten]

Why are protons stable? I'll take a stab at surface tension. When you study a proton, we are told they contain 3 quarks, and when you study the nucleus of an atom we are told that is where the protons and neutrons reside and is typically drawn as a group of spheres of one color or another all jumbled together. But what if the nucleus was more like a drop of water? We know water comes as a molecule, but when included in a drop of water individual molecules lose their identity, fluidly interacting with all the other molecules in the drop. So, I would suggest to apply that same grouping result to the items that make up the nucleus of the atom. Once included in the group, the different quarks quit acting like protons and neutrons and start interacting with all the members of the group. It then becomes the surface tension of the entire group that forces them to remain in the proximity of the nucleus.

[@claragabbert-fh1uu]

No, it balances. Now you will understand why a quantum computer operates very much like a musical "steel drum". The "qubit" is like a mesa plateau of many atoms that raise it above the substrate surface. This makes the qubit like a mason jar in that it affixes the electromagnetic field of the mesa island to the upper rim of the qubit, like a soap film clinging to the mouth of a mason jar that you invert into soapy water, remove & set upright. The electromagnetic field, like the soap film, sets the tension within the qubit like a tight-walker's rope does. Now, the field (like a soap film) exerts influence upon the atoma in the qubit; it creates an "entanglement" or equilibrium among however many atoms that it takes to make a quantum, or electron circulation, (soap) bubble of the same tension as the field (film). This is how the rim of the qubit is made to feel the presence of the bubble inside. The tension of the field film establishes both the speed of the qubit switch, the size of its signal compared to "noise" AND the shape of the signal that the bubble makes when it collapses. This is important to know the purpose assigned to that bubble. All of this so far is like making one dented area in a steel drum that pings 1 musical note. The "computer" comes from linking these qubits together in sequences of connection that make a "song" or "program" that answers a question. This is done in 2 ways: 1) different size qubits (or the same size qubits) are placed in differing geometric patterns around each other, so they can handle different numbers of (inputs + outputs) that basically in math define a "word", meaning (characters + aspects of answer), which is the same as saying they do an "operation" of math or of relational truth called "logic". 2) then all or some of these qubits are linked to each other as needed by structures inbetween them that make fields between them, much like more soap films. This is like clustering a bunch of mason jars together into shapes, with just the screw part of the lid on each, and putting small magnets between only some of them. By designing these tension pathways of (magnet) films, we can make sequence circuits like mazes that solve problems "bit by bit". Doing this is like making a musical steel drum to answer a specific question. Ancients actually made steel drums AS computers TO model the stars in the heavens, to see how big a problem would become, and by THAT knowing that if they could solve it. Some steel drum musical tunes became their "program" to solve it. Today, the quantum computer leaps beyond that. By being atomic (quantum), it is fast, so it can resolve very complex problems with the blazing speed of an orbiting electron. By being electronic, meaning based on streams of electrons, we can reconfigure the computer quickly to resolve all kinds of problems with the same or with different programs. Steel drums can only solve a few problems at a time, beyond which we enjoy making noise. So THAT is how ancient knowledge became new ... AGAIN .U.

[@thestuffoflife88]

Michio Kaku holds me fast..we are dealing with Quantum, Now, now..where Our thoughts and Our focus, create things, our reality. To me Quantum is 'the Force' as referenced in Star Wars. We are at free will to choose our focus.

[@huica1950]

DR MICHIO, FROM A VERY YOUNG I BEGAN TO FOLLOW YOU AS YOU DEMONSTRABAS IN THE LABORATORY SOME NON-REAL IMAGINATED THEORIES. YOU WILL ALWAYS BE MY SCIENTIFIC IDOL. FROM EUROPE I GET ON MY KNEES BEFORE YOU TO GREETINGS. ENGINEER JORDI HUIMAN CASTILLO.

[@crown_ambassador1249]

Revelation 9:6 During those days people will seek death but will not find it; they will long to die, but death will elude them. 38:51 "we don't have to die" Michio Kaku

[@user-om8es5fk4v]

After such great introduction ...

[@musicexplayer]

In a thermonuclear computer the DIE is placed in an absolute vacuum of solid metal. Em um computador termo nuclear o DIE é colocado em um vácuo absoluto de metal macico.

[@franciscomedinav]

What a great content. I watch these kind of content all the time, and stand up comedy to get a little laugh. 😉😎

[@claragabbert-fh1uu]

Quantum computers DO NOT operate on atoms actually being in multiple states or places at 1 time. Instead, they represent probabilities of finding particles in multiple places in the FORM OF wave equations modeling fictitious particles called "calculons". They do this in an analog way using actual atoms. Actual atoms do NOT have multiple states or locations at 1 time; they have probabilities of finding things in any 1 place at any 1 time.

[@womp6338]

Quantum computers don’t operate at all they are just useless junk

[@pokerface73964]

thank you for the info! can you share where I can learn more about this please? currently my research is covering it

[@claragabbert-fh1uu]

@@pokerface73964 a given mass only occupies 1 place at 1 time. Quantum probabilities distribute mass among locations and times. There is a HUGE difference.

[@bible1st]

​@@claragabbert-fh1uuSo it loses mass if it's mutiple places at once? Does it divide that mass?

[@claragabbert-fh1uu]

Mass IS only at 1 place at 1 time. Wave equations represent probability of finding mass at location; this does not allow 1 mass to be at 2 locations simultaneously, but may allow equal chance of finding 1 mass at either location. Pribability is not reality; it is chance if reality. If 1 mass had moved from 1 place to another by momentum, mass loss would be cosmically small, attributed to entropy, and is either permanent as hysteresis or in some places might be regained from background. If 1 mass moved by interaction with another mass, there would be entropic loss, which may show up as mass loss. Whether this is regained at all from background depends on context and circumstance. The question is not as straightforward as an uncharged particle tends to be. But a question is easily loaded with misunderstandings.

[@TheBenbedard]

Michio Kaku needs to proofread his slides. Rife with spelling errors: "Rusts Belt" "Turning Machine"

[@justmeisthatu9069]

But I'm also curious about how do we know how it worked if it never made its destination and if it was found on the bottom of the sea floor are you telling us that it still worked after it was taken up from the bottom of the Sea and after all years ???

[@usher-p]

i would have loved to watch this if i was 12

[@forexy6911]

but Before the epidemic, they talked about the universe to the doctors all over the world

[@JanuszRafaowski-tj5ul]

Mr Kaku is wrong in one part, code of Enigma was broken in December 1932 by Polish mathematician Marian Rejewski .

[@encumbereduser-lw9wo]

Fusion reactor successes are needed. Leveraging AI to control or shape the plasma by manipulating magnetic fields is known and demonstrated. Also demonstrated has been the acoustical levitation of beads. I would like to understand the feasibility of a combined system of magnetic and sonic principles applied in tandem to provide shielding . Am I on to something? 😮

[@SyangjaliThitoMagar]

Michio Kaku = Best Teacher

[@shloksuman8164]

used to watch him on discovery science!

[@johndawson6057]

Wow here's a medal for you 💩

[@derp8575]

$cience Imagine watching corporations lol

[@genejones7902]

Ordered a copy on Amazon! 🖖

[@umairm.5662]

Now we know string theorists overestimate stuff.

[@garystewart3110]

yeah they overestimate their ability to do math. took 40 guys over 40 years now and still haven't gotten close. 100 years ago, it took 1 man 10 to give us literally everything that we know.

[@VeroPereida-tw1mb]

Si no es bueno subestimar a las personas