Flash Graphene + Flash Joule Heating | Nanotechnology Course Lesson 06

Рет қаралды 104,570

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер

@GraydonTranquilla 2 ай бұрын

Yes I have loaded my own bullet shells with that specific loader and just completed a 40+ year Electrical Engineering career involving arc flash studies and fully understand everything you are talking about here. So glad that you are doing this R&D.

@Infinity-fz3sn Ай бұрын

Absolutely it's just nobel job what he is just sharing with all good intentions Just loved it

@Infinity-fz3sn Ай бұрын

Never came across such a great, pure content on youtube sharing so much so pure with absolutely with all the good and pure knowledge It's just nobel Hats off "SIR"

@david-cz9pi 3 ай бұрын

Appreciate your efforts my friend. Blessings to you and yours my brother in Christ Jesus.

@reyhudson563 2 ай бұрын

Marvelous, Prof. Tour! My dad was a lecturer, and a good one, and had a good understanding of physics, optics, mechanical engineering, energy efficiency, astronomy and space science. Though he was, nominally, also a Christian, he didn't bring Jesus to work. That's sad. God bless and prosper you in the work you're doing and the testimony you give.

@omegamkandawire3576 3 ай бұрын

Waiting. I recently discovered Dr Tour on KZbin, he makes a lot of sense.

@noway905 3 ай бұрын

OR, is he making lots of cents? 😅

@omegamkandawire3576 2 ай бұрын

I have listened a few of his debates and presentations. He makes a lot of sense.

@josiastorrecampos5475 2 ай бұрын

@@omegamkandawire3576 that's right

@larryclark9380 3 ай бұрын

Always appreciate your explanations Dr. Tour. Making the unseen understandable.

@harryedwindavies 3 ай бұрын

Honesty and truth . Eventually, at last 🙏💕🐶

@FrankPCarpi 3 ай бұрын

Dr. Tour, thank you for another informative and entertaining presentation about Flash Joule graphene production. And regarding your last comment about turning dead bodies into graphene, it made me think about something funny. Imagine God having to reconstitute the resurrected bodies of the saints from their molecules if they were used in various construction materials. While the bodies of the saints are being raptured up to the clouds, buildings would be collapsing below. Yes, it was just a funny thought that I had. I don't see that actually becoming a customary way to use the remains of our loved ones.

@HoangNguyen-hc9og 3 ай бұрын

It's fantastic research. Thank you for your amazing lessonS.

@sammcrae8892 Ай бұрын

There was a startup project plant in Missouri, or perhaps Arkansas some time back, and I don't know if it is still going or not, BUT -- that facility was able to take anything organic, hydrocarbon, or (I think) carbon based, such as the unusable by products from all of the chicken and turkey farms in the area (which was why they set it up), and with high heat and pressure, in a few hours, they could turn it into high grade crude oil stock -- ready to go to the refinery. And it was competitive at about 80 - 90 dollars per barrel with conventional crude oil sources. It didn't matter what it was, as long as it was hydrocarbon, or organic molecules. Feet, feathers, beaks and brains, fat or anything left over from the poultry processing operation. The REALLY cool thing about it was it would also take ANY organic or oil based plastics (most of them), rubber, including old tires, and all kinds of otherwise useless stuff like old newspapers, wood pulp, plant stalks, rotten hay and straw, dead animals, and leftover frying grease from restaurants. Literally anything that was based on or even mostly based on organic molecules; and turn it into oil. Oil you could use for all the stuff that we use oil for, from fuel, lubricants, and plastics. Even though it's not usually cost effective merely for the fuel production, when you consider that it's a good way to get all that stuff out of the environment or the city dump, or to keep from having to just burn it, it's still a great idea. But as with many great things that would benefit our society, like liquid salt cooled Thorium Nuclear Fission Reactors (Check KZbin for info) it seems to have fallen off the radar. But if you consider that process as a better and more effective method of recycling, it makes a lot of sense. Oh, as an aside, those Salt cooled Thorium fission reactors can use the so called but not really Nuclear Waste left from our current inefficient nuclear reactors for fuel, and burn it up for energy; which would result in much less "waste" left over, and much of that is not actually a waste product, since most of it is useable for nuclear medicine, and various other helpful things. Sometimes it really does make you wonder if we are truly running things for our best advantage, or just hobbling ourselves by allowing entrenched special interests to call the shots for our representatives, and our policies.🤔🤯👀

@vincetoscano7018 3 ай бұрын

Thanks Dr. Tour for this presentation. I would like to think that back in the day, the use of glass was a better vehicle for the use in food and drinks. I have not looked at the cost reusing glass in this way. We would not be dealing with waste plastic. One to add is bags, recyclable.

@jimpsonuyaguari9665 2 ай бұрын

God bless you Dr Tour. I look it up that graphene is used in many products like batteries, clothing and more. I look to buy the viralwall air purifier because I have allergies, but I can't find it here in us.

@Clyens Ай бұрын

It is often the case that researchers working in one field can learn something useful from researchers working in a seemingly unrelated field. In that spirit I think it would be useful to point out that processing materials employing the rapid discharge of a capacitor bank has been/is used widely used by other material scientists, mainly involved with powder metallurgy. Although this work, dating back to the early 1900’s, mainly focusses on the consolidation of materials the work has also shown that electrical discharges from capacitors can be used to prise materials apart. One of the difficulties working in this area arises from the many different names that have been used to describe electrical discharge processing of materials. The names that have been used include, among others, electric discharge compaction (EDC), high energy high rate (HEHR) sintering, capacitor discharge sintering (CDS), Dynamic Magnetic Compaction (DMC) and flash sintering (FS). Between 1906 and 2010 around 450 patents dealing with the rapid electrical discharge processing of materials were published. Key, early patents describing methods that (in my opinion) most closely resemble the methods employed to produce graphene using electrical discharges are as follows; Bloxam A G 1906 GB Patent No. 27,002, Taylor G F 1933 US Patent No. 1,896,854 , Hoyt S L 1932 US Patent No. 1,843,768 , Gilson E G 1930 US Patent No. 1,756,857, Inoue K 1966 US Patent No. 3,241,956, Okazaki K 1990 US Patent No. 4,929,415 What a pity that the early researchers employing electrical discharges to process materials did not know that, when using graphite electrodes under vacuum, they were most likely producing graphene.

@ickorling7328 Ай бұрын

Hello, can we discuss rapid electrical capacitor bank parts and safety suitable for flash graphene or faster.

@TheWildColonialBoyAus 3 ай бұрын

30% increase in compressive strength of concrete and 20% increase in tensile strength is incredible the annual savings alone to the construction industry of production and applications are staggering

@dallynstevens7855 3 ай бұрын

The most useful things to humanity tend to be revealed to God fearing people

@88njtrigg88 2 ай бұрын

@TheWildColonialBoyAus The Mico plastics when these buildings will be demolished will be staggering. Start end end use needs to be quantified. As it stands Road base is the most recycled product on the planet. Wood and water are still the most renewable source ever.

@mysteryteacher9 3 ай бұрын

Wouldn't it be possible to use this system in some way for economic energy / heating?

@johnlindsey-ep6nr 3 ай бұрын

So if you do same Type prossee with titanium will it find it best structure thus strongest state .? Diamond dust ? Quarts crystal?

@TimFarner 3 ай бұрын

Fascinating and encourageing

@jim1scoggins 3 ай бұрын

I'm new and have a question about "cloning" is it moral and real life?

@binhanh296 3 ай бұрын

I would say it is real life and moral, just taking the fact that all the cells in our body created by God keep cloning themselves and changing into different part of the body. However, there are things to consider. While the cells created by God have the ability to clone itself perfectly, the question is, was the cells made by human be able to do so, because if it can't, then the result would be... well, I don't want to imagine, and if that living being would be able to have a soul or not is unknown... so if it's a failed attemp, you would have to kill it, and that will make it immoral. If you can do it perfectly, no fail product, then it's not immoral, if you can't, then please don't.

@rovidius2006 2 ай бұрын

@@binhanh296 Cloning in theory only , all trials failed so far ,ending in defective short lived specimens .

@davegeorge7094 3 ай бұрын

How many joules capacitor is needed for 1 gram carbon conversion?

@jtjames79 2 ай бұрын

Tech ingredients has a DYI. They did this method, it's super effective.

@Tresador 10 күн бұрын

@DrJamesTour 3 questions. Do you still need investors? How can I give you money? Are you licensing your patents?

@TataLinoNetwork 3 ай бұрын

This could kill the current market competition with that price gap.

@bradjones5107 3 ай бұрын

Can a similar device be devised to produce Borophene?

@cristilaye5912 3 ай бұрын

If I took 1 fizer jab, will I have nano structures?

@bogdanpopescu1401 3 ай бұрын

yes, and you will last forever

@Redheadedlady55 3 ай бұрын

~I have accepted the Bible as Truth & my Lord allowed me to come to HIM with grace & love. Listening to Dr. John Lennox which I dearly love. Reading Henry Drummond book & Oswald Chambers. Billy Graham has been an inspiration to me through Daily Bread mthly daily readings. Thank you Dr. Tour.

@leawilliams8476 3 ай бұрын

Did they use graphene in vaccines??

@KenJackson_US 3 ай бұрын

I heard him answer this at some point. He said you would be able to see it in the vial, and you can't. So no, there was no graphene in vaccines.

@marjan4jc 3 ай бұрын

@KenJackson_US 3 ай бұрын

[Wrongfully censored--restoring] He said you would be able to see it in the vial, but you can't. So no, there was no [g..e] in [v..s].

@tamlynburleigh9267 3 ай бұрын

Loved your science, and also love our Saviour Jesus.

@jeffreydani8616 3 ай бұрын

This similar reminds me about the inventor of the Otis T Carr craft who built his craft that mimics how the solar system and galaxy operate. The craft was pure electromagnetic that can travel more than the speed of light.

@jimmieblue6262 3 ай бұрын

All plastic comes from oil. Turn it into fuel gasoline and diesel. They are doing it India with excellent results.

@Broody58 3 ай бұрын

When the day comes if its dimensionally bonded, say cube form, I wonder what it'll be like? I dont even know if its properties can be calculated? Hopefully "the material of the future"!

@Nah_Bohdi 3 ай бұрын

Very cool.

@gregvisioninfosoft Ай бұрын

Im lost. I learned that 'graphene is a one atom thick sheet of carbon atoms'. If one shoves a glass tube with material and 'flashes' it. Wont the result be a 3D solid? as opposed to a one atom thick carbon sheet?

@ickorling7328 3 ай бұрын

Le Clair effect is almost the same thing, impulsed current on water with plates where one plate is solid and the other has small round holes in it. It's fusion energy. All amazing energy transformation phenomenon are from self organization of space-time under the conditions of an ultra-fast impulse.

@ickorling7328 3 ай бұрын

Open source is the only way to keep impulse technology off the black self of 'fear' and ensure nobody can own and suppress it. Dr. Seven Greer's disclosure efforts and ideas are the spirit we need, and even better tech to open source ideas without getting shut down.

@RoboArc 3 ай бұрын

I wish he was my professor, I'm over looked pretty hard.

@MasterChief4U 3 ай бұрын

The dream is in Battery Efficiency\Capacity....

@preciousplasticph 3 ай бұрын

I have started building my own flash graphene processing. I recycle plastic but I skip a lot of the steps, It has a very basic separation, grinding and no washing. I then extrude it into lumber. I would like to add it to this low grade plastic to make structural materials like concrete rebar. As for now without the graphene I am making fence posts and landscaping materials. But even all that, i get so much more plastic given to me than what I can process at this time.

@zuukash 3 ай бұрын

so ur wasting plastic to make coal hmmmmmm nah dont get it

@Bytheirfruitsshall 3 ай бұрын

Please expand on your comment. Dude is making fence posts. @@zuukash

@zuukash 3 ай бұрын

@@Bytheirfruitsshall graphene is coal we have more than enough coal FOR now but platics are MORE precious than coal also we already HAVE coal energy u know burning stuff schould be the LAST option not because we cant be fucked

@Bytheirfruitsshall 3 ай бұрын

@@zuukash Graphene can be made from coal (Leonardite) sure, is that why Bill Gates bought all that non Ag land?

@zuukash 3 ай бұрын

@@Bytheirfruitsshall @Blissblizzard @Blissblizzard why would a billionare buy non agrucural lands? to hope building HOUSES WILL be permitted there in the future DUDE HAS MONEY like HAY WTF WHY THE FUCK WOULD HE NOT AND WHAT THE FUCK HASbill gates BUY LAND TO DO WITH ANYTHING bill gates is not BUYING LAND BECAUSE TOUR MAKES GRAPHENE ARE YXOU FUCKING BREAINDEAD? lastly WHY THE FUCK ARE U EVEN BRINGING UP BILL GATES BBILL GATES IS NOT A CREATIONIST ANYWAYS sooo u a pointless hack dude ur literaly like tomatos red therefore god exists FUCK YOU ALREADY

@jamesbaran9409 3 ай бұрын

Yes but all that recyclable plastic could be made into like building blocks like Lego blocks just bigger sized and made it to use for houses you might have to add a little wood chips or something to it to make them a little more durable

@FortBaker2011 3 ай бұрын

Dr Tour, I wonder if you have seen this paper, “Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study.”

@Bytheirfruitsshall 3 ай бұрын

I've been directly asking him that on previous videos too. It is peer reviewed in Korea and Japan l believe.

@qinaan Ай бұрын

That is why Plasma is a magical state of matter. Soon you will find the gateway to other realms through the central core wormhole of Plasma the fourth state of matter leading to unknown destinations.

@nadanalia3000 3 ай бұрын

Hi Dr Tour, it’d be amazing if you and Dr Sy Garte (Jewish biochemist and Christian) could connect. What an amazing chat that would be! ❤❤

@Frodojack Ай бұрын

@@nadanalia3000 I think they already have.

@rogergriffin9893 3 ай бұрын

Why can't the reprocessed plastic be used for food items? And the environmental costs of producing new plastics are uncounted and not included in costs.

@susangriffis1588 3 ай бұрын

yes!

@platinumpig 3 ай бұрын

Congratulations on making very expensive soot. Could we see the actual products that were made from this soot ? Like a bottle or a plate or some utensils ?

@aryaman05 3 ай бұрын

Did you listen to him explain its use in concrete ?

@unlicensed_camera Ай бұрын

Soot that if you put 0.1% of in concrete by weight increases compressive strength by 35%. So yeah, this soot is very valuable. Not the same molecular structure of ordinary soot.

@eddyimpanis 29 күн бұрын

Thermal depolarization turns all organic materials into FUEL, CH4…C8H18…etc

@CharlesMatheson-w1z Ай бұрын

Maybe it's time to just move back to glass, and not the cheap crap that is available in North America, but the thicker reusable glass that is still used in some European countries

@Llansara 26 күн бұрын

@CharlesMatheson-w1z so agree with this, like the old days milkman dropping off the bottles then you'd leave the empty bottles in the crate to have more milk the next day... that's keeping farmers in business and recycling natural, not like today mate xx

@Opamachtplanetarbeit 3 ай бұрын

There are ways to recycle plastic without collecting, sorting, washing, drying, transportation...

@Opamachtplanetarbeit 3 ай бұрын

kzbin.info/www/bejne/fWWykpV-gcxrqpYsi=ExwVp5OU5VZuienN

@shaunperhat Ай бұрын

WoW!!!!!!!!!!!!

@brianwarnock 2 ай бұрын

If this concept is viable I hope it never goes into public ownership. Elon finance?

@darkfox77 3 ай бұрын

Peer reviewed= herd agreed.

@zuukash 3 ай бұрын

nope ur so WRONG

@ianlee5812 3 ай бұрын

@@darkfox77 Kinda makes you wonder why he’s willing to submit his graphene and molecular machine research to peer review

@KenJackson_US 3 ай бұрын

@@ianlee5812 Only way to get it published so it's accepted as science.

@johnkuykendall7028 Ай бұрын

I’m betting I can do it cheaper. I’ll mention your channel when I post a video.

@Vandrelui Ай бұрын

cARA METEU O loucO. jesus!!!! NO MEIO DE UMA PARADA DE CIENCIA, sOOU COMO UM ignorância TREMENDA.

@Skookman 3 ай бұрын

Investing?

@yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559 3 ай бұрын

❤God said the climate will be fine. Genesis 8:22 - While the earth remains, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, shall not cease.”

@christinesandilands9662 3 ай бұрын

@@yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559 hallelujah and Amen 😁🙏

@MentalWanderings 3 ай бұрын

This isn't the place for mistranslated and misrepresented old world texts.

@yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559 3 ай бұрын

@@MentalWanderings are you implying that there is universal and timeless standard of morality in the universe, organizing the places where it is appropriate to say certain things? Or are you just attempting to give me commands on your own authority?

@yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559 3 ай бұрын

@@MentalWanderings Or simpler terms, Jesus is the king, not you.

@65gtotrips 3 ай бұрын

@14:30 - Wood is better than plastic because God created first fully mature trees, the wood fibers and seeds.

@darkfox77 3 ай бұрын

We all know what peer reviewed actually means .

@jacquesdemolay2699 3 ай бұрын

I am pretty sure if you bump into a tree with your car - the tree would be furious -- just that it can't tell you anything. furious trees are not known to have come down town to revenge though. maybe in the far future they will grow legs and arms - and then humanity will have to be more vigilant.

@horsejohnson7959 2 ай бұрын

Gang what I will definitely debate you about Jesus dying for sins not yet committed (that's crazy and not the contractual type of interaction in older texts) and that he even "died" on the cross which isn't what's described even in the current heavily edited version of history in the modern Bible

@rogergriffin9893 3 ай бұрын

Great that they may be able to repair spinal cords using graphene. But I don't want head transplants. Sometimes, we just have to accept our deaths. Our souls can be returned to the place where souls dwell.

@jeffharmed1616 Ай бұрын

Thanks. Nicely presented. CO₂ emission when making cement is absorbed as the cement cures.

@rockzalt 3 ай бұрын

Turning people into graphene 🤣. No doubt some radical green energy people might write that into their last will and testament.

@kohlWinters Ай бұрын

i guess everything is 1/3 of co2 production, because vegans are saying cattle produce that much. green party says our traffic produces that much. i remember during covid they said planes produce that much, so people would be less inclined to fly i am sure... i guess as long as you look at the data the right way... you can make anything be the producer of 1/3 of our CO2 emitions... i feel this is just a buzz phrase to get support and public funding.

@kohlWinters Ай бұрын

its funny too, he seconds later says its 8% lol...

@ianlee5812 3 ай бұрын

Dr. Tour, do you have plans on debating any of these people now that you’ve debated Dave Farina? Gutsick Gibbon (Erika) - knows paleoanthropology (human evolution), debunks young earth creationism extensively - Aron Ra - knows paleontology and evolutionary biology, argues against various flavours of theists in biology - Creation Myths (Dr Dan) - knows genetics, disproves very specific claims of creationists mathematically - Forrest Valkai - knows a lot about biology, great for education of science newbs and ex-YECs - Dapper Dinosaur - knows a lot, debunks all kinds of pseudoscience, kinda like Prof Dave but more livestreams - Based Theory (Grayson) - knows abiogenesis, debates many topics in molecular biology and geology - Age of Rocks - very small channel, has great explainers on radiometric dating and how it works - King Crockoduck - knows a lot, had a famous debate with Kent Hovind on age of the universe

@agaluszka 3 ай бұрын

The most chaotic presenter I've ever listened to

@ianlee5812 3 ай бұрын

If Dr. Tour is so confident that his statements on origin of life are factual, why doesn’t he publish his critiques on origin of life research in reputable peer-reviewed journals like Nature or Angewandte Chemie? It’s not like you can’t publish critiques in these journals. I read 2 critiques published in Angewandte Chemie and Nature about how a compound made by Stephen Liddle’s group may not exhibit aromaticity. Why CAN you publish critiques on those topics but not origin of life if, like Jim said, they’re both basically synthetic chemistry? Critiques: [{Th(C8H8)Cl2}3]2− is stable but not aromatic, Bonding in a Crystalline Tri‐Thorium Cluster: Not σ‐Aromatic But Still Unique

@TheTruthPlease100 3 ай бұрын

It isn't nonsense because it takes it out of landfills. It is the inefficient, sloppy (on poupose) methods that are insisted on that make it cost more! So..... Stop slopping around and actually "try" to make it worth while and stop "trying" to make it not work and it actually will!

@zuukash 3 ай бұрын

so TURNING palstic into COAL in sorry graphene is a waste of plastic......any comments?

@jon__doe 3 ай бұрын

Graphene is not coal. Graphene is NOT flammable unless mixed with something that is like VOCs. You really are desperate to impugn James Tour. Making things up will only come back on you though. That's exactly what happened to Prof Dave.

@zuukash 3 ай бұрын

@@jon__doe 550C to burn graphene DAMN U stupid but YES graphene are single sheets of ´coal´of more specifily graphite(sorry im taking the biological version instead of the abiological version tomato tomato) so need more PENCILS than plastic NO burning it into coal schouldnt be the first instinct pay MONEY TO PROPELY RECICLE IT FOR THE FUTURE SO WE CAN USE PLASTIC NOW AND THEEEEEEN or wanna talk about how the mouse wasnt healed BECAUSE of the graphene

@zuukash 3 ай бұрын

@@jon__doe yes evertyhing is HYPE as tour would say graphene is flameable 550C, coal well coal is ´biological´ graphene AINT next ur gonna tell me the rat healed BECAUSE of the graphene ignoring WHAT it was doing and IT itself doesnt have ANY healing properties also show u u NEVER looked at BOTH sides of the conversation and were just waiting for tour to say NU-UH dave gave tour over 700 papers that do EXACTLY what tour pretends DOESNT happen

@zuukash 3 ай бұрын

@@jon__doe 550C to ignite graphene DAMN no wonder u think tour is gods magic man ur brain dont work so good

@mirandahotspring4019 3 ай бұрын

Would have been better without the BS about resurrected gods. Stick to the subject Jim, leave the BS out of science.

@flyingtime5501 3 ай бұрын

@@mirandahotspring4019 without God, there is no science

@flyingtime5501 3 ай бұрын

Without God, there is no science

@mirandahotspring4019 3 ай бұрын

@@flyingtime5501 Absolute nonsense!

@zekariasberhe1059 3 ай бұрын

@@mirandahotspring4019 and who are you , you tell what to say what to believe to ppl ?

@mirandahotspring4019 3 ай бұрын

@@zekariasberhe1059 cope harder

@mwmann 3 ай бұрын

Didn't Dolly Parton write a song about Graphene ? Oh no that was Jolene.

@kery1334 Ай бұрын

It sure won't stay at sixty thousand for very long. Mass production will drive the price down fast. Tech Ingredients. does a DIY on this process for more details. Its disappointing to the point that you wouldnt want to try this at home alone.

@ianlee5812 3 ай бұрын

@MuzaffarKrylov 3 ай бұрын

Dave is a fake so he was no challenge for Dr. T. It would be nice to see him humble those other people too. The pattern is clear. If they say "it's just around the corner...." they're just trying ro keep the $ rollin in. Follow the science. You will always find a bank account. Hopefully they have the mettle to face him with their fake claims but once he reads the chemistry, their claims will be DOA. That's the Beauty of Real Science.

@jon__doe 3 ай бұрын

He's already stated he will not debate KZbin personalities, PhDs only. That's why he has no debates, they won't do it. I've engaged with AronRa, he ran away. I've engaged with Forrest, nothing but rhetoric. I've also engaged with Dave, and he ran away too, but with a lot of expletives. And James Tour is not a Young Earth advocate.

@ianlee5812 3 ай бұрын

@@jon__doe Why even debate? Why not publish his critiques in peer-reviewed reputable journals like Nature and Angewandte Chemie? He has no problem subjecting himself to peer review when he publishes research on graphene and molecular machines

@jon__doe 3 ай бұрын

@@ianlee5812 Because he's commenting on science like so many others do. This is nothing but rhetoric. Not publishing doesn't translate to being wrong, it means he's reviewing the work and papers and giving his EXPERT opinion. Seriously, you complain that he speaks on the topic, but can't refute a word he says. Why? All he's saying is that abiogenesis is incredible. You're allowed to believe in the incredible just like anyone else, and abiogenesis is certainly incredible. As the true definition: in - prefix meaning not and credible or Not Credible.

@ianlee5812 3 ай бұрын

@@jon__doe When did I say anything about abiogenesis being incredible? I don’t even think anyone mentioned abiogenesis till you brought it up. Also, I don’t even think I’m saying there’s anything wrong with Jim’s critiques. Which makes me wonder why he won’t publish them.

@ianlee5812 3 ай бұрын

@anthonycarbone3826 3 ай бұрын

Ian why not change your name to troll farm??? I am sure you would be more useful and use your lack of skills for people that might be able to use them. Of course that might a long shot as garbage in garbage out describes you perfectly.

@ianlee5812 3 ай бұрын

@@anthonycarbone3826 Spoken like a person whose feelings were definitely not hurt.

@anthonycarbone3826 3 ай бұрын

@@ianlee5812 That was a dispassionate response to a person trolling a KZbin site. If it looks like trolling and smells like trolling it is trolling. Sorry man I have to be honest and tell the truth.

@ianlee5812 3 ай бұрын

@@anthonycarbone3826 I don't even get how I'm trolling. If I was calling Jim a wife beater or an adulterer, you'd have a point. But I'm not.

@ianlee5812 3 ай бұрын

@bogdanpopescu1401 3 ай бұрын

doesn't matter, it's the origin of life researchers who need to prove that it's possible, not the other way around

@ianlee5812 3 ай бұрын

@@bogdanpopescu1401They don’t need to prove it’s possible. They already did by publishing papers. Jim hasn’t. Thus, HE’S the one who should prove himself

@bogdanpopescu1401 3 ай бұрын

@@ianlee5812 haha, you are so clueless; origin of life research is about proving life can begin on its own by chance; they didn't prove shit; that's why they keep searching and keep asking for funds; the papers they published are small results, far away from the end goal

@ianlee5812 3 ай бұрын

@@bogdanpopescu1401 The fact that origin of life researchers have published papers and research ALONE means they’ve made more progress in the field than Jim. I couldn’t care less about anything else. Just because you say something on the Internet without subjection to peer review doesn’t make it true. I’m sure on the Internet many people say life didn’t come about via abiogenesis. But people also say the world is flat and vaccines cause autism

@bogdanpopescu1401 3 ай бұрын

@@ianlee5812 sure, pal, follow the science

@ianlee5812 3 ай бұрын

@MCstutta 3 ай бұрын

Why would he debate any of these people? The only people he would debate would be people who are claiming to have made significant progress in the area of origin of life research. Dr. Tour, I'm sure, is well aware of people's arguments concerning young earth creation. I'm not even certain he is a young earth creationist himself. But even if he is, it's not his area of expertise, he is a synthetic organic chemist.

@ianlee5812 3 ай бұрын

@@MCstutta But during Jim's debate with Dave, Jim explicitly said that he's not talking to scientists but rather people who don't read the academic literature. In that case, these people are right up Jim's alley in terms of who he should debate. In fact, scientists are the people Jim SHOULDN'T be talking to, especially exclusively.

@ianlee5812 3 ай бұрын