I am totally open to Dr Peyam's explanation of closed sets. Well done!
@cybersecurityguy2 жыл бұрын
I'm taking this course as a prerequisite for general relativity. Amazing videos.
@drpeyam2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!!
@aneeshsrinivas90882 жыл бұрын
[a,b] be like, all your limits ℝ belong to us.
@MrWater2 Жыл бұрын
Thank you! And please continue teaching us with so much passion! Amazing teacher and videos!
@raminrasouli1914 жыл бұрын
Thanks. This video could be a very good start for topology.
@mathwithjanine4 жыл бұрын
Such an informative video! Thank you Dr. Peyam!!
@iabervon4 жыл бұрын
I found it a bit odd that open is defined by balls but closed is defined by sequences. So: a point x is a limit point of E if, for all r>0, there is a point in E in B(x, r). The proof that this definition is equivalent is like half the proof that the complement of an open set is closed and vice versa.
@drpeyam4 жыл бұрын
I completely agree! The sequence definition is more practical, that’s why I started with it
@emanuelvendramini20454 жыл бұрын
Excelent class of sets! Thank u man
@jamesbentonticer47064 жыл бұрын
If you can find time in between your teaching and research, you should write a math text book. Maybe DE's.
@masoudsakha2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the great video I have a question: In some references, there is a difference between the set of all limit (accumulation or cluster) points A' and the closure of a set "A bar". They define Closure of A (A bar)= union of A' and A I think A_bar=A' when we do not have isolated points.
@claracherif622811 күн бұрын
thank youu dr peyam🥰🥰🥰
@mfonpeter1248 ай бұрын
You are a life saver. Thanks so much
@drpeyam8 ай бұрын
Happy to help!
@danieldulchevsky3 жыл бұрын
I'm taking Topology this semester at ASU; I didn't know you taught here!
@drpeyam3 жыл бұрын
Woooow what a small world! I was there last year :) Enjoy your topology course!
@dgrandlapinblanc2 жыл бұрын
Ok. Thank you very much.
@Happy_Abe4 жыл бұрын
If the complement of an open set is not open then what about R? R is open and its complement, the empty set, is open too.
@drpeyam4 жыл бұрын
I said not *necessarily* open! It could of course be that the complement of an open set is open but it isn’t always the case
@suayhossien4 жыл бұрын
Sets are not doors
@suayhossien4 жыл бұрын
Remember complement of open is CLOSED not NOT OPEN. Not open and closed are different bro bro
@suayhossien4 жыл бұрын
Keep in mind one criteria for a topology on a set is that both the everything and nothing are elements of the topology, strictly via definitions this implies they are both closed sets as well as they are complements of one another. Sort of also in def of connected , it doesn’t assume the sets that form serparation need be closed it only assumes open but then by def they are both open and Thus clopen lol
@Happy_Abe4 жыл бұрын
@@drpeyam oh my bad, thanks for the clarification!!!
@morgengabe14 жыл бұрын
One that is non-trivially openable and clopenable
@eliyasne96954 жыл бұрын
very intriguing!
@jeffreyanderson12495 ай бұрын
What about not a ball but a sphere? Is that open?
@ahmedmghabat79823 жыл бұрын
Hi Dr Peyam Is N*(set of naturals without zero) closed in real metric?
@drpeyam3 жыл бұрын
Yes, a convergent sequence of natural numbers is eventually constant, hence converges to a natural number. Same thing if you remove 0