Fitna Inkar-e-Hadith : Shaykh ul Islam Dr Muhammad Tahir ul Qadri : Episode 2

[@khuramhashmi]

Dr.Tahir-ul-Qadri is presenting the true peaceful message of Islam .

[@azizurrehman4306]

Dr sahib log ab khaty hai k namaz ka inkar krty hai kuka namaz rakty nahi hai is lia namaz sirf zikar ka nam hai wzahat frma day by muhammad shaikh from canada adopt this akeda

[@FasihaSiddique]

please add all episodes link (of this lecture sereis) in description of each video

[@khalidmajeed2886]

sir in loogo ka iteraz hazrat essa alia salam per us ka kia answer haay

[@adilrasheedonline]

It is important to know a few basic things about hadith before claiming these hearsays to be the word of prophet and branding their rejection as biddah. The sunni scholars reject shiit hadith and viceversa. Bukhari himself rejected 99% of the hadith he collected and retained only 1%. Now the scholars misguide us by making us believe that these hadith are the undoubted words of the prophet. Here is what Allah tells us in unambiguous words: [Quran 45:6] These are God's revelations that we recite to you truthfully. In which hadith other than God and His revelations do they believe? In response to the above verse our sunni ulema present six hadith books and the shiits ulema present 4 authentic hadith books. Haven´t they made a mockery of Islam ? Hadith are mere hearsay. It is something like A heard from B who heard from C who heard from D....who heard from G who claimed that the prophet said / did so and so. In modern terminology this is called Chinese Whisper, which has no credibility in preserving information. Try circulating a paragraph of text through a chain of 10 narrators and verify for yourself. A hadith shouldn't be confused with the statements or actions of the prophet. Those who claim hadith to be the words or actions of the prophet run high risk of attributing falsehood to the prophet no matter how nice they sound or appear. Any hadith is actually an alleged saying attributed to the prophet and propagated through a chain of 7- 8 narrators over 200 years or more. What we have (for eg. in Bukhari collection) are 7000+ hadith categorized by Bukhari (not by Allah or the prophet) as authentic from a total collection of 700,000 hadith circulating at his time. The methodology that was used to authenticate hadith is called "Sound chain of narration". In this, the character, sincerity and mental health etc. of narrators in a particular chain was evaluated by hadith compilers several decades / centuries after the narrators had died. This act of character evaluation involved backbiting and slandering which is considered a sin in Islam according to the Quran. The organized slandering and backbiting was conducted at an unprecedented scale in human history. In Quran, Allah tells us that there were hypocrites among the sahaba and the prophet had no idea about them. Ironically, in one hadith prophet is alleged to have said that on the day of judgment some of his companions will be take away from him and Allah will inform about their bad deeds. It is interesting how hadith collectors could evaluate the characters of those narrators who were dead long back and even prophet himself was not aware of their character. The most authentic collections of Bukhari and Muslim do not match 100% because of personal biases and judgment. These two major collections are rejected by the Shiits sect of Islam as unreliable. Thus is can be said that belief in a certain set of hadith automatically divides the Muslim ummah into at least two distinct sects: Sunni and Shiits. Such sectarian divide is strictly prohibited by Allah. There is a consensus that there is not a single hadith in the entire collection which can be considered a verbatim quotation from the prophet. Just like majority of Jewish, Christian, Hindu scholars can be wrong about the basic of religious beliefs it should not come as a surprise that the majority of Muslim scholars are also wrong. In fact, Quran criticizes those people who follow scholars, ulema blindly and take them as Gods. One can find story tales, blasphemy of the highest order, contradictions, unscientic and illogical stus attributed to the prophet. In fact one can use hadith to project the prophet with diametrically extreme and opposite personality characterwise. Most of the abuse that the enemies of Islam hurl upon our prophet has some basis in these hadith collections. Although, the clergymen and hadith followers claim that they let Quran superseded hadith, there are numerous occasions where the verse from the Quran are abrogated by hadith despite a command from Allah that none (including the prophets) can abrogate his verses.