Dr. Rex, thank you for sharing. It might be beneficial when HR is significant to show the absolute risk difference between the groups. It will help estimate the risk exposure. For example in this study, the absolute risk increase for inflammatory heart disease was 1.23 per 1000 patient-year. In addition, one of the limitation in all VA study was that they have few female in their population. It's the nature of VA population, but it might be difficult to put inferences to female when only 10% of cohort were female. I think it's important as female had a different risk profile than male particularly after menopaused.
Dr. Rex 一直很敬佩你這個channel提供理性又update的醫療資訊。但這次的內容有感可能把causation和correlation混淆了,所以所以希望提一些意見以供參考。入院和重症ICU的病人,身體都是比較弱,有心血管的疾病的機會相信亦比較高。所以這兩樣病症狀同時出現的機會也大。所以不能因為數據上這些病人因為中了新冠病毒之後有血管疾病,就說Covid 可以引起心血管疾病。兩樣病徵可能同時發生,並沒有因果關係。
@DrRex-lb7gn2 жыл бұрын
this may be true but this virus can cause vasculitis eg MIS C so it is not illogical to think if infection is serious cardiovascular system may be affected
@AlfredC2882 жыл бұрын
@@DrRex-lb7gn 根據Nature 的報告中了新冠肺炎每一百萬人有40 個案有心血管疾病 而打了三種的疫苗的人是 一百萬人中有 1,2 or 6 個個案。所以打疫苗仍然是有好處的。謝謝你劉醫生
Dr. Rex, thank you for your sharing. Can you further explain how COVID-19 affects blood vessels and what recovered patients can do to reduce the risk of getting heart diseases?
@@arthuryau187 In as much the same way as there are medical practitioners who speak ill of the drug, there are also a lot who accept the drug under the circumstance. It is a matter of opinion from different angles and different circumstances. As an alternative, what, in your opinion, is a more constructive way of handling this COVID-19 situation as oppose to just doing nothing. Currently, no one would force anyone to get inoculated, and for the greater good of the community, can you offer something better? Please allow me to say this, an optimist can see opportunities in a crisis whereas a pessimist can only see the weakness in an opportunity. Breakthrough can only come from optimist who always look on the bright side of things.
@hohoho4972 жыл бұрын
Dr. Rex, has this data mapped with patients taking or not taking vaccines, which brand/type of vaccines, what kind of medicines/injection those patients taken during treatment in hospitals? As these cardiac diseases might also be caused by long term side effects from vaccines, medicines, other injections
@billylai62 жыл бұрын
All the symptoms Dr. mentioned sounds like all the reported side effects from vaccine.
@wpgc22 жыл бұрын
Not directly in this study but I think the research team is working on an extension of this study to compare infection with/without vaccine. Another study shows vaccine helps long COVID patients so most will expect vaccinated people will have less chance of getting long COVID.
@Dobame2 жыл бұрын
I was about to ask the same question too..
@Dobame2 жыл бұрын
also, the result is from delta or earlier type patients not Omicron. Omicron just appeared late last year. No one year record to compare.. Omicron is a much weaker virus. Risk of having long covid is much lower than from delta..
@terencey282 жыл бұрын
Non-hospitalized patients have higher portion of vaccination, ICU patients have lower portion of vaccination. So that I don't think these cardiac diseases are caused by the vaccine. Of course, these cardiac diseases might be caused other medical treatment, but it is not the key point for the public. The public just need to know the importance of vaccine, the vaccine can reduce the chance of hospitalization and the corresponding medical treatment.
但當全人類大部份人(e.g 80%)已打了針(either 1,2,3針) 但又受感染...咁請問將來可以點解讀complications are resulted from those EUA vaccine or nature covid 19 infection? 是否根本已冇得統計.只可信官方既應為呢?
@meiwong79312 жыл бұрын
叮噹筆不見了?
@johnlee25482 жыл бұрын
Dr. Rex, 醫管局採購的默沙東新冠口服藥莫努匹韋 有冇副作用, 如果不幸確診入院, 可否拒絕服用莫努匹韋?