This is an absolutely brilliant scene. Lincoln quietly whittling while they gripe at him is funny as hell. Then he interrupts mid-sentence and tells a funny story that doesn't seem entirely germane to the subject. He laughs at the punchlines before he even says them. Then he proceeds to conduct a complex legal debate against himself for 4 minutes, arguing every nuance of the law and making the arguments of two opposing sides, as though he is actually 2 lawyers making arguments in front of a judge. After a lull and another self-depricating joke, he pronounces his ruling and demands the support of the cabinet. In one scene, he acts as proxy for the attorneys from both sides, then the judge and ultimately transitions to executive. The way he navigated the legal ambiguity and tenuousness of the situation is represented perfectly in this one scene.
@JRobbySh5 жыл бұрын
Indeed.
@bcdside5 жыл бұрын
Well said!
@sherriecaskie31114 жыл бұрын
Lincoln had the ability to view his actions from a "third" persons point of view. That is an admirable trait, in which few people can imagine or be willing to do.
@edjones92354 жыл бұрын
The man was a genius and a champion of freedom who knew how to play the game.
@dirdib694 жыл бұрын
"No one has ever lived who knows better than you the proper placement of footfalls on treacherous paths." Mary is, in her way, in awe of her husband. She talks later about how people will "marvel" at him, and that they should.
@fencingperson4 жыл бұрын
Memorize this real quick: Abraham Lincoln: Back when I rode the legal circuit in Illinois, I defended a woman from Metmora named Melissa Goings, 77 years-old. They said she murdered her husband, he was 83. He was choking her and she grabbed a-hold of a stick of firewood and fractured his skull and he died. In his will he wrote: 'I suspect she has killed me. If I get over it, I will have revenge.' No one was keen to see her convicted, he was that kind of husband. I asked the prosecuting attorney if I might have a short conference with my client. And she and I went into a room in the courthouse, but I alone emerged. The window in the room was found to be wide open. It was believed the old lady may have climbed out of it. I told the bailiff right before. I left her in the room she asked me where she could get a good drink of water, and I told her Tennessee. Mrs. Goings was seen no more in Metamora. Enough justice had been done; they even forgave the bondsman her bail. John Usher: I'm afraid I don't see... Abraham Lincoln: I decided that the Constitution gives me war powers, but no one knows just exactly what those powers are. Some say they don't exist. I don't know. I decided I needed them to exist to uphold my oath to protect the Constitution, which I decided meant that I could take the rebel's slaves from them as property confiscated in war. That might recommend to suspicion that I agree with the rebs that their slaves are property in the first place. Of course I don't, never have, I'm glad to see any man free, and if calling a man property, or war contraband, does the trick... Why I caught at the opportunity. Now here's where it gets truly slippery. I use the law allowing for the seizure of property in a war knowing it applies only to the property of governments and citizens of belligerent nations. But the South ain't a nation, that's why I can't negotiate with'em. If in fact the Negroes are property according to law, have I the right to take the rebels' property from 'em, if I insist they're rebels only, and not citizens of a belligerent country? And slipperier still: I maintain it ain't our actual Southern states in rebellion but only the rebels living in those states, the laws of which states remain in force. The laws of which states remain in force. That means, that since it's states' laws that determine whether Negroes can be sold as slaves, as property - the Federal government doesn't have a say in that, least not yet then Negroes in those states are slaves, hence property, hence my war powers allow me to confiscate'em as such. So I confiscated 'em. But if I'm a respecter of states' laws, how then can I legally free'em with my Proclamation, as I done, unless I'm cancelling states' laws? I felt the war demanded it; my oath demanded it; I felt right with myself; and I hoped it was legal to do it, I'm hoping still. Two years ago I proclaimed these people emancipated - "then, hence forward and forever free."But let's say the courts decide I had no authority to do it. They might well decide that. Say there's no amendment abolishing slavery. Say it's after the war, and I can no longer use my war powers to just ignore the courts' decisions, like I sometimes felt I had to do. Might those people I freed be ordered back into slavery? That's why I'd like to get the Thirteenth Amendment through the House, and on its way to ratification by the states, wrap the whole slavery thing up, forever and aye. As soon as I'm able. Now. End of this month. And I'd like you to stand behind me. Like my cabinet's most always done. (Beat). As the preacher said, I could write shorter sermons, but once I start I get too lazy to stop. DDL is amazing.
@foxwolf71073 жыл бұрын
WOW
@MickeyFlipper3 жыл бұрын
Just a slight emendation. “Why cod at the opportunity.”
@marshalironsides87773 жыл бұрын
Well done.
@RobertWF422 жыл бұрын
Nah, the script is written down on the papers in front of him. :-)
@fencingperson2 жыл бұрын
@@RobertWF42 Oh yeah, it could be hidden behind the pile after the 2:11 cut. Before that, he certainly memorized the first section. The rest...he does looks down at the desk just often enough.
@michaelreidperry3256 Жыл бұрын
Thank you, Mr. Day-Lewis, for playing our president so brilliantly and honorably.
@dirdib694 жыл бұрын
I love how Lincoln appears to be evading the question and then answers the question fully, from every angle. An extremely intelligent but practical man, he's thought about the question quite a lot.
@abehambino5 жыл бұрын
What I loved the most about this movie was its exploration of the legalities and politics behind the Civil War. These days the complexities and nuances are glossed over. I agree, that given the subject matter of dealing with freeing an oppressed people, it’s hard to question the morality, but very few people today understand just how illegal, unenforceable, unconstitutional, and downright dangerously abusive of executive authority it was. This is simply one of the best legal lectures ever put to film.
@IggyTthunders4 жыл бұрын
"This is simply one of the best legal lectures ever put to film." Watch John Adams debate the Declaration of Independence w/ John Dickinson. kzbin.info/www/bejne/nnSlmIyDh6eYY68 kzbin.info/www/bejne/eIKrnHqGjbJ2i5o Now *that* was debating an illegal and dangerous political maneuver; and that was just the manifesto of the States declaring independence.
@sherriecaskie31114 жыл бұрын
@Doug Bevins Yet again well writ! Regardless, of my personal reverence for A. Lincoln. I'm compelled to ask you if he made any actions that could've been deemed impeachable?
@StrategicWealthLLC4 жыл бұрын
@Doug Bevins - I'm amused at your self-righteous rant. Your comment about the Greeks doesn't come close to addressing the tensions between the authority of the federal government and state governments in Lincoln's era...especially prior to the 14th amendment which completely changed the game. You have not addressed - AT ALL - how a federal executive had the authority to overturn a state's laws while simultaneously claiming that those states were not in resurrection against the federal government. As the actors in that clip discussed, while it could reasonably be argued that freeing slaves DURING THE WAR (against whom?) was justified (using the logic you expressed), there was every reason to believe those freed men and women would be re-enslaved after the war using the logic expressed in the clip. And the "you know, YOUR white supremacy" comment was the comment of a jackass.
@StrategicWealthLLC4 жыл бұрын
Doug Bevins - You may continue to copy and paste as you did before but, like before, your points are not addressing the points brought up in the clip. That is so obvious that it borders on the ridiculous.
@StrategicWealthLLC4 жыл бұрын
Doug Bevins - No, you didn’t.
@kkroeger5868 Жыл бұрын
I can't imagine having a president this morally clear and dedicated to higher goals...
@ambrosephill9 Жыл бұрын
Really higher goals, have you seen the crime statistics in our major cities and who is committing them?
@adamwallenfang Жыл бұрын
@ambrosephill9 You seem to be implying that abolishing slavery was a bad thing. Besides being an extremely minority position in the 21st Century it's also an inadvertent admission that the war was indeed about slavery.
@Mattribute Жыл бұрын
The movie character is quite different from the reality. The real man was a horrible person and president. Maybe even worse than Millard Filmore.
@ambrosephill9 Жыл бұрын
@@adamwallenfang I don't really care if people think that the war was over slavery. It does not matter. Slavery was legal. The North never boycotted any of the crops produced in the South. The North just seemed to love Southern cotton, rice, sugar, tobacco, alcohol, indigo, etc...... If they had a problem with slavery. They should have boycott the South. In fact if the North had that much of a problem over slavery the should have kick the South out of the Union. That would have solved the problem.
@662wc5 Жыл бұрын
@@Mattribute Thank you for giving us such a fine example of confirmation bias in action
@TomKaren942 жыл бұрын
Daniel Day Lewis may very well be the greatest actor of all time.
@dougdouglas21122 жыл бұрын
I agree. I'm hard-pressed to think of a second best actor that has anywhere near his talent
@dougdouglas21122 жыл бұрын
Hear, hear
@notd0ll1092 жыл бұрын
Nah he is.
@michaelreidperry3256 Жыл бұрын
No doubt.
@AttilatheNun-xv6kc Жыл бұрын
It's hard to think of an actor whose range of technical and artistic skills is superior to his.
@peterkierst2744 Жыл бұрын
This is artistry of a very high level. The writing captures much of subtly and sophistication of Lincoln's thinking, the performance of Lewis captures that, as well as Lincoln's personality as described by people who knew him, in a completely authentic way, and the direction and performance of the other actors creates a thoroughly realistic, almost jarringly authentic, sense of what being in a room full of people talking about something important is actually like.
@johnschuh8616 Жыл бұрын
That Lincoln could have let an old lady get away with murder rings true, for both judge and jury would have regarded his action as equitable, as themselves being overruled by a higher court, or as the old lady having been pardoned by executive action.
@mikecoles66024 жыл бұрын
I think this is one of the best 6+ minutes of acting by one individual in movie history. Just my opinion. There's humor, anger and a sense of uneasiness all rolled into that scene. Lewis did a 5 star ⭐ performance as Lincoln.
@dougdouglas21122 жыл бұрын
100% agreement!
@petermancini593 Жыл бұрын
Brilliant scene. Tony Kushner hit this out of the park.
@yorktown99 Жыл бұрын
It's not stated in this scene (yet is stated elsewhere in the film), but Lincoln wants the Amendment passed by Congress before the war ends. He understood that if the war ended first, the Amendment might not pass at all, either because of the readmission of the Confederates or from Northerners' desire to change as little as possible.
@B2Roland Жыл бұрын
It makes a lot of sense to pass the amendment with the southerners not at the table in Congress and begin reconstruction with a 'clean slate' and with the issue of slavery done and settled.
@662wc5 Жыл бұрын
Did you watch this scene? Watch it, again if necessary. It's absolutely stated in several ways throughout this scene that the 13th A has to happen before the war ends, such where he and others in the room explain that the EP was a war measure and won't stand up after the war is over, so the 13th A is needed before that happens. It's also stated again where holds up a pen and says he wants to sign the 13th A on February 1st (in 1865, in other words, before the war ends). It's what the entire scene was about.
@dkupke2 жыл бұрын
This scene embodies why I think Lincoln was one of, if not the best and most capable presidents we’ve had. The constitution does grant the executive office expanded powers in times of crisis, and the situation Lincoln walked into was absolutely a crisis. Problem was that because they’d never been invoked before, no one really knew what they were so he had to wing it and improvise as he went along. And I don’t think anyone could have done better.
@Jamhael12 ай бұрын
And that is why Lincoln is not only a great president, but a great LAWYER: he measured the legal consequences of the issue of slavery and the Civil War, the lack of real limits of presidential emergencial powers, and did the needed, but measured approach to the situation. I think that, based on the circumstances, Lincoln would follow Washington's example and refuse a 3rd term is he was not assassinated - he wanted to solve the Civil War and slavery issue, not to be a dictator for life.
@akasmarty20034 жыл бұрын
Lincoln was a genius. Way ahead of his time. RIP Abe
@kayvan6713 жыл бұрын
He sure knew how the Game worked. He was a political genius indeed.
@johanneshjortshj86468 ай бұрын
I always come back to this scene for some reason.
@jacobcorcho25183 ай бұрын
Because humanity. What it is like to be a human that doesn't hate others for the color of their skin or where they come from.
@collinsagyeman61314 жыл бұрын
I love how Stanton is just sitting there stone faced. Not laughing at any of the jokes
@nonsense15584 жыл бұрын
Stanton was known as a serious, no nonsense man. He was exactly the man Lincoln needed to run the War Department!
@bcdside4 жыл бұрын
In the immediate chaos after Lincoln was shot, Stanton ran the country, no question (Seward and his son Frederick had both been injured and nearly killed that same night). Even after Johnson was sworn in the morning of April 15th, it was Stanton who was pulling most of the levers of power.
@AbeBSea4 жыл бұрын
Stanton does that to this day.
@jguitar1514 жыл бұрын
Classic Stanton
@mikevaldez76843 жыл бұрын
@@bcdside It has been speculated that Staunton was at the top of the plan to assassinate Lincoln
@siege2218 Жыл бұрын
One of the best written, most engaging scenes I've ever watched. Tony Kushner + Daniel Day Lewis = Magic
@BobPantsSpongeSquare972 жыл бұрын
I love how after his eloquent monologue, this other guy seemingly not listening or understanding, just labels Lincoln a tyrant by twisting meanings of the law. And Lincoln is just like, "Well, I gave the people a year and a half to consider what I did, and they reelected me so there."
@johnschuh8616 Жыл бұрын
Lincoln is NOT a sophist.
@benkeel29662 жыл бұрын
Daniel is so amazing. This performance is profound and epic. Like Lincoln himself, Daniel is passionate and has embraced this character with his heart. This is why he retired. He went out on top. GOAT
@iana38922 жыл бұрын
I found the voice choice strange at first. Today, I cannot imagine Lincoln’s voice as anything but this: soft but strict southerner with a tinge of elderly age and an overall tone of wise. Daniel Day Lewis nailed it, from before the front to after the end, even if I couldn’t understand it then. I truly can’t imagine Lincoln any other way now, I can see why Daniel had said that this was one of the few characters he has performed whom he truly loved. It’s hard not to.
@ijunkie3 жыл бұрын
Story telling is the most important art a lawyer must master
@pendragon09052 жыл бұрын
Can't agree more
@howardlovecraft7502 жыл бұрын
After this movie was made it became an instant classic, one that'll be watched over and over again for years to come.
@mikegalvin4843 Жыл бұрын
I remember being a young child in school and asking my 2nd grade teacher, What did Lincoln do that was so Great? She told us that he had saved the Union. This movie certainly helped show me, years later, the conflicts within his party and himself. I had read the books, but they didn't show the human side of the man. Arguably one of the best performances by an actor ever done. This scene and its roller coaster of emotions was a big part of it.
@lenharper85023 жыл бұрын
It’s amazing how much thought went into his analysis. Pondering benefits, risk and morality and weighing those data points against the tools available to the government. I like how the movie depicted Lincoln’s decision making process and the explanation behind it.
@jacklandaupresents3 жыл бұрын
Lincoln was 5 steps ahead in the art of legalities.
@lenharper85023 жыл бұрын
@@jacklandaupresents I agree. In my view, this scene is an excellent example of critical thinking and planning.
@dougdouglas21122 жыл бұрын
Well said, couldn't agree more. Not only having that thought process but then being able to explain the process in an understandable way.
@662wc5 Жыл бұрын
It's why Lincoln aged so noticeably in five years. He was only 56 in 1865 but he looked like a man in his 70s.
@johnschuh8616 Жыл бұрын
Lincoln carried Euclid around with him as he rode the circuit. He was a great logician.
@pedrozaragoza22535 жыл бұрын
God bless Abraham Lincoln.
@DoorknobHead3 жыл бұрын
Without people feeling a justified god given superiority over other people, would there have been slavery during this time of U.S. History? Seems this god character likes to play both sides.
@jasonhayden50773 жыл бұрын
@@DoorknobHead god had given free will. What you do with it will be deemed at judgement day.
@mism8473 жыл бұрын
Tribe god Kanahaah bless Abraham Lincoln
@64MDW2 ай бұрын
@@DoorknobHead Don't mock God.
@DoorknobHead2 ай бұрын
@@64MDW Yeah, I don't respect any precursors to blasphemy "laws". ON THE BRIGHT SIDE: All gods are mythical, so technically it could be said I can't mock that which does not exist. WINNING!
@pyromania10182 жыл бұрын
The Emancipation Proclamation was a political gesture that gave the UK and France an excuse to not get involved in the war after the battle of Antietam (which Union propaganda painted as a "second Zama") made them question the Confederacy's chances of victory. That it brought the subject of abolishing slavery to the forefront made supporting the rebels (who didn't even try to hide that protecting slavery was their reason for rebelling in the first place) politically unthinkable for two nations where slavery was illegal (and hated by the working class), as did the Union's possession of a crop that both nations considered far more valuable than cotton: grain.
@moblinmajorgeneral2 жыл бұрын
And after helping the Ottomans win the Crimean War, Turkish cotton became significantly cheaper in the short term, so they could afford to cut the South loose and not lose money on textiles.
@joaoascencao575 Жыл бұрын
That was certainly a big reason following the summer of 1862. I would just say that at this point in 1865 Lincoln's viewpoint on slavery as it pertains to the war had changed a lot and it became almost a spiritual perspective. Lincoln came to believe that the bloodshed and suffering of the war were to atone for the sins of slavery and that there was now virtually no distinguish between the ending of the war and the ending of the institution of slavery
@662wc5 Жыл бұрын
Yes, the EP had several purposes and was an excellent tactical move. Acting as a restraint on European involvement was just one of those purposes. Lincoln had such great intuition about leading public opinion along while being careful to not get too far out in front of it. He if lost the border states or got tossed out of office by the voters in '64, the whole effort and sacrifice would have been moot. It was an incredible balancing act.
@SomeFreakingCactus6 ай бұрын
Besides: The South’s greatest natural resource of the time was cotton, of which Egypt was able to produce a fair quantity.
@whyme39044 жыл бұрын
The other actors listening to Daniel were like....man hes good
@007ndc3 жыл бұрын
In a historical context just about every man in the room ran for the presidential nomination in 1860 against Lincoln himself. Their egos made them think they were better than he was.
@benn4543 жыл бұрын
@@007ndc And Lincoln's brilliance in appointing them to his Cabinet to both assuage hurt egos and enable him to keep an eye on his political rivals was a stroke of genius.
@2259r3z2 жыл бұрын
@@benn454 Keep your friends close and your enemies closer
@scottloar4 жыл бұрын
The man Lincoln did have powerful argument and subtle reasoning.
@blueconverse873 жыл бұрын
I don’t know if the black and white was intentional, but it gave the scene a good Turner Classic Movies feel.
@adamwallenfang3 жыл бұрын
It was intentional...but to avoid copyright infringement.
@chrisholmes61324 жыл бұрын
He does such a good job of acting that he makes you forget that its acting. Its like you're watching Lincoln himself
@dougdouglas21122 жыл бұрын
True that! Get chills watching and listening to that scene
@christianrubert126 Жыл бұрын
Wish they had VHS back in 1865 closest well get
@johnpitchlynn93414 жыл бұрын
There is no dubiousness in Lincoln's policy. The Constitution and his oath gave him the authority to do what he did during wartime. He wasn't the first President to exercise these powers nor was he the last. God bless Abraham Lincoln.
@mightymartianca2 жыл бұрын
Whether true or not, without the amendment once the war was over, it would become a question of states rights.
@palmerlp2 жыл бұрын
Spielberg is a master of every filmmaking technique known to man and a few he invented himself, but in this scene he shows that with a great actor sometimes the slow push-in is all you need
@tomrockhill86342 жыл бұрын
I still can't get over how much he looks like Lincoln.
@NealX_Gaming Жыл бұрын
You know what else was dubiously legal? The Declaration of Independence.
@ProjectEkerTest33 Жыл бұрын
That wasn't dubious at all. It was flat out illegal by British law but then illegal isn't the same thing as unjust
@major_kukri24307 ай бұрын
@@ProjectEkerTest33eloquently said.
@RakeeshJ42 жыл бұрын
‘Version of cheap labor’. Well that’s certainly one way to refer to human slavery.
@64MDW2 жыл бұрын
He who accepts slavery as an institution should be willing to have himself and his own family wear the chains and be sold like cattle at the whim of his owner.
@ctotheb77752 жыл бұрын
The look on Secretary Staunton's (Bruce McGill) face throughout this scene is brilliant.
@ronditchen66645 жыл бұрын
You know you always hear about Einstein and Tesla on all these other scientist great men that they said wer geniuses Abraham Lincoln was a genius he was a very very smart man blows me away about some of the things he's wrote and some of the things people's wrote about things he said and did was so far ahead of his time just a great great man
@said114 жыл бұрын
Lincoln like Einstein, I don’t know about Tesla were INTP’s on MBTI scale., just like myself. Lincoln was giant of a genius and intellect. He understood that in order to keep the United States together and strong well into the future and not splinter off and eventually be concurred by another country like Spain, Portugal or Germany. The demonic practice of slavery had to be abolished in perpetuity. Hate for another race is a cancer that rots from within. If America had fractured permanently, could we have fought and won WW1, could have defeated Hitler and the Nazi weakened, probably not. We face this same cancer in 2020. How many Americans will side with “the better angels of our nature”? Certainly not the on sitting in the Whitehouse right now. He’s not even a real Republican. Not a Democrat but a deranged demagogue.
@markdudley56563 жыл бұрын
A "score" is 20 years. In the Gettysburg address of 1863 when Lincoln said "four score and seven years ago" he was referring to 87 years before (1776). So in the description of this video, "150 score and 2 years" is equal to 3,002 years ago.
@mickeyj59224 жыл бұрын
Didn't know that there were hidden cameras in 1865 hot damn.
@dougdouglas21122 жыл бұрын
Dude, they are EVERYWHERE!
@christophercaldwell68884 ай бұрын
Interesting ... early cameras DID exist at the time of the American Civil War (and slightly before), called "Daguerreotypes". We actually have stills of Lincoln. Alas, not very good for spying: Huge, noisy (loud flash required) and STINKY (developing chemicals). About as subtle as a tank. And of course, totally unsuitable for taking moving pictures or sound track. Still, people being people, you just KNOW somebody tried to use one of these things surreptitiously!
@jacobcorcho25183 ай бұрын
They needed to get all those angles baby @@dougdouglas2112
@daviddelaet8116 Жыл бұрын
Lincoln was the best lawyer in our history.
@Eazy-ERyder Жыл бұрын
The Emancipation Proclamation was the most UNpopular of our Great president's decisions, and also tbe best thing that could have EVER happened to this country.
@dclark1420026 жыл бұрын
This is the best scene in Lincoln, IMO. A very clear and direct assessment of the legality of the Emancipation Proclamation...and also a very good assessment of why legality and morality are not always the same thing. Laws are useful guides, but they are also the servants of their corrupt masters. Where the law is obviously confused...someone must take it upon themselves to deliver meaningful and positive change...and that prerogative by design in our system lies with the legislature. Executive action may be of use in emergency...but the judicial checks on it are such that the only real power to effect justice lies with the people and by extension their legislative representatives. Obama's executive orders were a timid step in the right direction, but unfortunately he did nothing to garner support in the legislature for the just cause he had begun...i.e. the roll back and dismantling of the absurd immigration rules and system we have established since the late 19th century. The people repudiated his efforts and now we have an administration attempting to enforce the laws without providing the due process services required by those laws. If only we would back up and divorce ourselves from the silly requirement to be 'authorized' to work...this whole problem could be solved...and millions outside of the protection of law would then be protected. Of course, that would mean substantial changes to our welfare system...
@alalalala574 жыл бұрын
Obama also, unlike Lincoln, had a largely opposition Congress.
@dclark1420024 жыл бұрын
@@alalalala57, doesnt mean much. The art of politics is getting people to support your proposals. Relying solely on brute force party strength is evidence of a weak politician. I place most of the blame for our broken immigration system on the legislatures inability to move beyond selfish 'party-only' legislation. I consider both the GOP and Democrats to be failures and active hinderances to good government for the people. The sooner we get rid of these two evil groups, the better.
@alalalala574 жыл бұрын
@@dclark142002 "doesn't mean much". Tell that to Lincoln. Why is it then such a hurdle for him to pass the 13th amendment _after_ a Confederate peace if he doesn't fear the former-South reps and moderates of his own party voting down any thing remotely like it in Congress? The two parties have not been any more or less functional now then they were back during the Civil War era. Its just none of were born then to remember the shit show.
@dclark1420024 жыл бұрын
@@alalalala57, and yet Lincoln worked to get Democrats on his side. Did Obama? Lincoln appointed people that hated him to positions of authority...sacrificing some of his goals for the goal of the amendment. Did Obama? People like to blame opposition for the failure of their goal...to which I ask...what did you do to change the opposition? All either party says right now to that is...nothing. They just blame the other party rather than actually working at politics to get something done. I refuse to accept the excuse anymore. All it indicates is the lack of competence by the person making excuses at politicking legialation.
@parkergroseclose69563 жыл бұрын
@@dclark142002 Mitch McConnell literally bragged about how he would not let a single bill pass while Obama was president. Looking at the Republicans now, its amazing Obama did anything.
@demibarton42714 жыл бұрын
Lincoln (2012) and Steve Jobs (2015) are both movies I enjoy watching. It is the dialogue I think that hooks me. Hours go by very quickly.
@mikevaldez76843 жыл бұрын
Slavery was not the South's "version" of our "cheap labor", as Adam Wall tries to state here in the description; it was one of the greatest human injustices of all time.
@jeffmorin58673 жыл бұрын
calm down there short pants.
@michaelterrell50612 жыл бұрын
@@jeffmorin5867 He’s correct though.
@arcade85_2 жыл бұрын
slavery is ubiquitous throughout human history. All living humans today are descendants of slaves, as well as descendants of slave owners. Slavery predates civilization.
@adamwallenfang2 жыл бұрын
Yah, I didn't actually mean to glorify slavery with that comment but merely draw a comparison. In fact depending on your outlook, slavery might actually be more expensive since the "employer" has to actually cover a minimum amount of food, clothing, and shelter, but that's actually one of the South's common arguments against the Union and I'd prefer not to clothe myself in the rhetoric of slavers and traitors.
@mightymartianca2 жыл бұрын
@@adamwallenfang The problems with slavery had been known since the days of the late Roman Republic, where the millions of people who had moved into Rome were largely underemployed, requiring one of the world's first mass social services program, and much of that had to do with the wealthy and merchants relying on slave labor, which was cheaper and with the growth of Rome's power and conquests, seemingly have those people an endless supply of cheap indentured labor.
@ttrestle Жыл бұрын
Imagine being an actor and memorizing all of this
@davidlawrence3645 Жыл бұрын
THE best scene in a movie of many best scenes. Lewis was masterful. The script was masterful. I doubt that such a movie could be made today. There are not, after all, any Marvel comic book characters in it.
@joliecide Жыл бұрын
This was an excellent explanation of why the 13th was needed in the first place.
@anthonyburn10105 жыл бұрын
Best and most important scene in the film.
@dougdouglas21122 жыл бұрын
100% agreement! That scene explains everything Lincoln has done to that point.
@nickcara974 жыл бұрын
The devil himself doesn't have a scowl quite like Edwin Stanton.
It's cliche at this point to say Daniel Day Lewis is a great actor, but, wow, he is fantastic here. I've seen dozens of actors play Lincoln in films and television shows. Most are cartoonish and hammy. A few, notably Henry Fonda, managed a fairly good performance. Only Lewis has ever risen above the hat, and the beard, and the weight of history, and found an authentic human portrayal that was neither melodramatic, saintly, nor corny. Lincoln was a great man, but he WAS a man, and Daniel Day Lewis brought him to life in this film - a remarkable performance by a truly great actor.
@dragonchr154 жыл бұрын
This is what happens when you surround yourself with men who hate your guts, but still want the same ultimate goal....
@footlesskicks17502 жыл бұрын
That DDL sure is special
@manilajohn01824 ай бұрын
While the Emancipation Proclamation was of dubious legality, it cannot be accurately stated that it was illegal. Lincoln's action tread the line on legality and by doing so raised questions regarding interpretation of then- existing law which had never been answered- because the questions had never before been raised. Taken as a whole. Lincoln's interpretation of Federal and state law at the time was superlative.
@carrickrichards2457 Жыл бұрын
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness/ Edit: 14th ammendment meant no law can overide the Bill of Rights.
@amlosaxon17733 жыл бұрын
So historically authentic for the guy who uploaded this video to record it in 1865.
@dougdouglas21122 жыл бұрын
...that is why it's in black & white, right?
@stargazer78762 жыл бұрын
We will obviously never know what was said during those real times, but damn was that amazing to just dream. What an amazing to put that on film.
@adamwallenfang Жыл бұрын
To me it's weirdly like another Spielberg classic, Jurassic Park. I know we don't know what dinosaurs actually looked or sounded like (in the raptor and T-Rex's case it's very likely they had feathers), but in my mind JP is what they looked and sounded like. I'm clearly not alone as the Rex roar has been recycled several times in other movies featuring one. In a similar way, I know Speilberg condensed and changed conversations and events surrounding passage of the thirteenth ammendment to make things more cinematic, but in MY MIND this movie sort of becomes what actually happened, lol.
@Krebssssssss8 ай бұрын
“I knew the people would tell me. I gave them a year-and-a-half to think about it, and they re-elected me.” That’s what a leader does. You stand on principle, and you LEAD. Make your case as clear, as frequent, and as concise as possible, carry out your agenda, and let your people make their decision. Now days, politicians look at the polling, or get hung up on a few holdouts in Congress and throw their hands up and go, “Whelp, nothing we can do.” The leaders go out and get the votes. They don’t wait for the votes to come to them. Our leaders these days are cowards only concerned with their titles and positions.
@thomashiggins93204 жыл бұрын
All justice systems, all laws, comprise attempts by flawed human beings to achieve justice, according to their flawed understanding of that concept. No justice system, no set of laws, ever created by human beings has ever approached perfection. They've only ever been the best the people of the time could do, at the time they lived, in the circumstances in which they found themselves. That means, at some point, situations will arise in which the flaws inherent in human systems will become apparent, and indicate a "justice system," as it exists, actually *promotes injustice*. That was the case with the U.S. Constitution, at its inception, that declared black slaves as only 3/5ths of a human being, for the purposes of determining the number of representatives a slave state could have in Congress. The representatives of the Southern States wanted them counted fully for the purposes of representation, as if they were citizens, but also wanted to deny the slaves any of the rights and liberties of citizenry. As part of what was called the "Great Compromise" (division of the Legislative branch into two houses, with members of the Senate set at two per state, and members of the House set according to population), the agreement was never anything more than a kludgy compromise that all the Founding Fathers thought would get altered or improved by amendment, within a few decades (if it even took that long). Based on that horrible compromise, the Dred Scott decision -- and others -- steadily destroyed any vestige of protection for the rights and liberties of black people, in the United States. However, until corrected, that grotesquely injust system remained the law of the land. It took 87 years and a brutal Civil War to correct that terrible inequity. But until that Civil War was fought, and the slaver states curb-stomped, and the 13th Amendment passed, nothing could change. This wonderfully cogent analysis of the situation explains exactly why, and presents the necessity in a fascinating scene brilliantly executed. It is one of my favorite moments from a film I enjoyed very much.
@steventorchia39055 жыл бұрын
If only we had such an intellect in the White House now.
@michaeldukes41085 жыл бұрын
Steven Torchia ... Laaaame. Easy. Predictable. Can we leave Donald J. Trump out of one comment section, in the name of God?
@steventorchia39055 жыл бұрын
MICHAEL DUKES Trump recently referred to himself as the greatest president in history. I'll let you be the judge.
@ruthlesshack12795 жыл бұрын
@@michaeldukes4108 That orange POS cannot EVER be left out of anything. It must be derided and challenged, along with those who support him, and finally EXPOSED to ALL for being the true racist, narcissist POS that he is and always has been, period! Go ahead, you align yourself with trumpturd and get EXPOSED for being a racist POS traitor!
@alalalala575 жыл бұрын
@@michaeldukes4108 Putting God and Trump in one sentence? Poor taste.
@abehambino5 жыл бұрын
If only we had such an intellect in the White House in the last thirty years. Trump is just one in a long line of idiots who have no respect for the Constitution and liberty, and yes, that includes the previous administration.
@Bulacanos2 жыл бұрын
Jim Crow really took on the 13th for another century
@dougdouglas21122 жыл бұрын
LoL
@philovance19403 ай бұрын
I read ‘ Team of Rivals’ a book about Lincoln and his Cabinet. Fantastic book. Lincoln was Truly an amazing man the likes of which Americans have never seen again.
@bassdaddy65482 жыл бұрын
Great scene! The Ethan Allen story scene is also one of my favorites.
@JRobbySh5 жыл бұрын
Excellent. Ironically, it illustrates the limitations of the law in the midst of a war, But also the usefulness of it in setting boundaries. Lincoln WAS a dictator in the Roman sense. or a tyrant in the Greek sense. But in each case, there was a moral dimension put to the use of force, an aiming for the common good. But that good was only partially achieved, and in the course of that achieving, much good was lost. Force always is unjust to a greater or lesser degree.
@HappyHauntsMaterialize5 жыл бұрын
But then again they had to use Force because the South wasn't cooperating and Lincoln was in a precarious situation with the union slave states. Also England was interested in helping the South that made things much worse.
@abehambino3 жыл бұрын
@@HappyHauntsMaterialize I agree, with both yourself and the OP. I’ve often been of the opinion that had Lincoln survived the war, he would have faced impeachment in Congress. Not that he would’ve been successfully removed, but once all these things came to light, the urgency of war over, and his political opponents restored to a little power, the discussion would certainly be had, and rightly so. The Congress would essentially ratify his actions by not removing him, as he claimed the people did by re-electing him, but make no mistake, he was treading some dangerous waters and much of what he did, for the noblest of reasons which I wholeheartedly support, we are still feeling the impacts of to this day.
@jonathancummings64002 жыл бұрын
What is "just", or "unjust"? Who decides that? Without forceful leaders throughout history, there would be no "CIVILIZATION". Maybe, not even Neolithic Farming communities. Even hunter and gatherer groups have governments, like Native American and New Guinea tribes having powerful Chieftains, who had powers that enables them to force the tribal members to do things against their free will or be forced out from the tribe or be killed outright, or suffer some horrendous punishment worse than a quick death.
@DeltaWolf- Жыл бұрын
May I know which what is the name of this scene and what is the title of this movie plz?.
@adamwallenfang Жыл бұрын
The movie is "Lincoln" (2012). Not sure if there's a name to the scene.
@neilpemberton55232 ай бұрын
@@adamwallenfang "Lincoln bosses his cabinet" sounds good. 😂
@kewltony4 жыл бұрын
Here's where it gets slippery
@dougdouglas21122 жыл бұрын
Powerful stuff
@martymcdonough11115 жыл бұрын
1:02 onward - D-Day sitting there nonplussed...
@timmaloney99765 жыл бұрын
When the end titles said "Whereabouts Unknown", nobody had a clue he could travel through time.
@hlysnan64183 жыл бұрын
This is my favorite scene in the movie. Shows the brain at work.
@gerrymcguire75212 жыл бұрын
To me, I would like to think, this is Abraham Lincoln! What an incredible actor. hands down my favorite president we have ever had. I think he was sent down here by God to lead us out of this mess. Daniel Day Lewis is mesmerizing in this role
@uwillal4 ай бұрын
Even Lincoln knew legality doesn''t mean a rat's rear end in the middle of a war.
@jamest24012 жыл бұрын
It’s been a long time since I’ve seen the film in it’s entirety, so I can’t remember. Is this scene in the movie, or is it a deleted scene? And why is this in black and white?
@Minoltalphafan Жыл бұрын
How about the dubious legality of enslaving another human?
@miguelservetus95344 ай бұрын
Oddly, unethical yes but by the laws at the time, legal. As the Dean of my law school said on day one, if you came to study ethics you are in the wrong school, but the law is a tool , a path to ethics.
@neuvocastezero18385 ай бұрын
The only reason that I'm not giving this a thumbs up is because of the possible algorithmic interpretation of a "like" assigned to a video entitled "Dubious Legality of the Emancipation Proclamation".
@robertoacevedo38054 жыл бұрын
Daniel Day Lewis is a fuckin boss! What great acting, flawless! Wow!
@kayvan6713 жыл бұрын
He sure knows how to play good 19th century Characters
@dougdouglas21122 жыл бұрын
DDL is on another level, by himself
@bradchristy50025 ай бұрын
Brilliant analysis!
@benkeel29662 жыл бұрын
What's funny about this story is that Mary Todd threw a piece of firewood at Lincoln early in their marriage. True
@Brianboru88 Жыл бұрын
As humans we sure tie ourselves up with words. Legality is whatever a body of elected reps say it is. In the UK, law and legality is whatever Parliament says it is.
@cynthiacassel5 ай бұрын
I love that movie. Daniel Day Lewis did a perfect Lincoln.
@hugorivarolamedina61728 күн бұрын
Que maldita gran pelicula...para verla y volver a verla 100 veces.
@leftymcnally6913 Жыл бұрын
Bruce McGill's subtle reactions are brilliant
@onehumanhistory4 жыл бұрын
lol stanton looks so pissed
@neilpemberton55232 ай бұрын
Yes, he didn't have much of a sense of humour!
@jeanmorin32477 күн бұрын
How can an actor who can internalize so completely such great wisdom and abilities not be himself a great leader. His rendition of Lincoln has to come from a recess in his mind where there is a Lincoln who could come to life if he was called out for acting.
@PatricKlein86 Жыл бұрын
Amazing how the found this original footage from a historic cabinet meeting!
@miguelservetus9534 Жыл бұрын
What a tour de force of writing acting and film making. And Lincoln was a gift from God. We could use him today. I still tear up when he walks out to attend the play. I want to scream Stop. Don’t go.
@fasillimerick73943 жыл бұрын
Edwin Stanton looks appropriately annoyed.
@FEARisCOLD3 жыл бұрын
It’s weird I prefer watching the movie like this. The unsaturated look made it feel almost like a documentary was done back in that day. He also looks even more like Lincoln some how.
@cubefarmerhkc91052 жыл бұрын
What a legal mind.
@ThefightingCelt5 жыл бұрын
... and now you have Donald Trump . The mind boggles .
@yavehsuarez93925 жыл бұрын
He was a Republican
@mitsumikyoya87465 жыл бұрын
@@yavehsuarez9392 "Today version" of Republican. Totally not the original, Lincoln's Republicans.
@kevinmorgan_truth5 жыл бұрын
Doesn't look anything like Abraham Lincoln but still carries on the Republican value of the individual rather than treating people by class or ethnicity. God bless the president of the United States.
@JRobbySh5 жыл бұрын
You had Obama,. He boggled MY mind.
@ruthlesshack12794 жыл бұрын
@@JRobbySh Obama was a decent caring human being, completely unlike the real true orange POS that currently STAINS and DESECRATES the White House today. It absolutely take either a corrupt greedy ass or a completely stupid bigoted ass to embrace that Piece of Shit today, bar none!
@christophercaldwell68884 ай бұрын
I cannot distinguish my admiration for the actor from the man he is playing. Would that we had such leadership today.
@GrymgaRPG4 жыл бұрын
I can't help but question the intelligence of the poster and the description when you say "150 score." Do you know what "score" means in the context of time? 20 years. 150 score is... 3000 years.
@davidw.27912 жыл бұрын
Well then it’ll fit in to Lincoln’s second inaugural speech. 🤣
@adamwallenfang2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for reading my description. I had intended to leave the error, since editing it after the fact seemed disingenuous. Nevertheless, if that is the only error you found, I assume my comparison is fairly sound.
@kimblers Жыл бұрын
What movie is this from?
@adamwallenfang Жыл бұрын
Lincoln (2012) by Steven Spielberg with Daniel Day Lewis as Lincoln kzbin.info/www/bejne/gXu5pqSPoK5loLM
@unbearable97703 жыл бұрын
My favorite scene in the whole film.
@The10folks3 жыл бұрын
Just awesome writing ✍!!!!
@EasyGoer-e3z2 ай бұрын
Incredible Scene Incredible Movie...Lincoln is a Movie That Gets Better The 2nd 3rd Time You Watch as You Start to Fully Understand Who All The Characters are and Their Roles
@johnwagner4776 Жыл бұрын
I used to think that Robert Shaw's speech/soliloquy about the USS Indianapolis in "Jaws" was the finest performance of that kind in American cinema. Daniel Day-Lewis (also a British actor) out did Mr. Shaw. Interesting to note that both those performances were directed by Steven Spielberg
@crimony30545 жыл бұрын
Abe says he never believed that slaves were property, but before he said he wanted to stop slavery's expansion into the territories. 2:49
@benh75 жыл бұрын
And what of the Corwin Amendment? I doubt Abe never believed slaves were property.
@crimony30545 жыл бұрын
@@benh7 Abe was a big liar.
@benh75 жыл бұрын
@Doug BevinsWhere did I ever say he was? From Lincoln's first inaugural address: "I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so." I understand a proposed Amendment to the Constitution has passed Congress, to the effect that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service. Holding such a provision to now be implied Constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable." So your first point is void. Traitors? An attempt to overthrow a government is rebellion. An attempt to separate and govern oneself is not. So point 2 is void. Certainly he was a lifelong opponent of slavery as were many both north and south. And I really don't understand how I can be a "white supremacist" if I'm not white. But you carry on with your insults for no reason and live your hate filled life. All that I ask is to be left alone.
@EricHabshey5 жыл бұрын
Doug Bevins LOL Doug. You’re the historical and Constitutional illiterate. Lincoln said he’d free every slave if it meant keeping the Union together and he’d keep every slave slave if it meant keeping the Union together and that he’d free some and keep others slave if that kept the Union together. He also thought blacks were inferior to whites in every way and should not be allowed to vote or mary or be educated with whites. And you’re an asshole along with being a douche. I suggest you go watch Lincoln by Spielberg again for the 100th time. You can’t handle real objective history so stay in your Disneyfied imaginary one.
@benh75 жыл бұрын
@Doug Bevins First rule of debate is if you have resort to insults you have lost the debate. In any case and in disregard of you being a raving lunatic please note that if you think Lincoln was not a white supremacist(by his own words he was) than I can't help whatever malady has crawled into your brain. Since you don't know me how do you know I am a race hater? Do I hate myself? I think monuments to slaves should re erected in every state. I believe no monuments North or South should be torn down by mobs in violation of law. Indeed, thank God for the historical record. Thank you for your visit.
@marshalironsides87773 жыл бұрын
what a great man was this
@JustSomeCanadianGuy2 жыл бұрын
“I’m sorry Mr. President I wasn’t listening could you start over?”
@sethjohnson52893 жыл бұрын
Cinematic Power... the great Daniel Day-Lewis try matching him!!!
@mickcraven9802 жыл бұрын
Man, DDL is great in this.
@JonSmith-zl5wc3 жыл бұрын
This how politics should be talk about with good friends and colleagues
@dougdouglas21122 жыл бұрын
Amen brother. A man might get the idea that he could make a difference exchanging political dialogue of this caliber
@mariocisneros9113 жыл бұрын
This is acting and true thought in how a movie is supposed to be . Unlike action movies that have the audience of a 14 year old