Duke of Windsor interview on Winston Churchill

[@scottstevenson99]

It sort of reminds me of Queen Victoria's description of her audiences with Gladstone--"He addresses us as if we were a public meeting".

[@RogerinKC]

Throughout their letters the duke and duchess used code names including Cookie for the Queen Mother, Shirley Temple for Queen Elizabeth II, and Cry Baby for Winston Churchill.

[@pamsatira1753]

even when he was just answering in an interview he sounded like he was making a speech

[@sylvesterlennon8925]

....what an extraordinary way of speaking? I had to watch an old episode of Dr Who and the Darleks to remind me where I heard such tone and diction

[@maxwellfan55]

S.L. Try learning to spell with correct grammar before you compare yourself to others.

[@Caro-my9vk]

@sylvester You’re absolutely right! I love the comparison to Dr Who🤣

[@droppedthekidsoffatthepool3257]

He sounds like a newsreader of his era! 😂

[@mindspring57]

According to one documentary, he promised her she would be "Queen, Empress of India, the whole bag of tricks," but as it turned out, he could not even secure her the style of "royal highness."

[@A_10_PaAng_111]

mindspring57 She was a nazi spy 🙄 People wouldn't be able to live with themselves approving that knowing that.

[@petekdemircioglu]

Looks like one can’t just grab the whole power by seducing one of them…

[@popazz1]

I'd recommend reading Sara Bradford's excellent book entitled 'George VI:The Story Behind The King's Speech'.In it there's a highly detailed account of Edward's abdication,all those involved,his Nazi sympathies & of course the Nation's reaction to Wallis.The queen mother,as queen consort,& before then as Duchess of York was vociferous in her criticism of Wallis.But Wallis gave back as good as she got.Fascinating stuff.

[@RogerinKC]

After the Duke of Windsor learned his mother had left him only three small boxes and a pair of candlesticks, he wrote to the duchess: "What a smug stinking lot my relations are and you've never seen such a seedy worn out bunch of old hags most of them have become."

[@gogogeedus]

:)

[@celiacoles6296]

He looks so frail, yet with a strong voice.

[@IrishCarney]

Chain smoker

[@The4preston]

Broadcast to mark Churchill's 90th birthday in 1964. Hence the part about "as he enters his ninth decade."

[@YouSimon1000]

This man never wanted to be a king. The romance with Wallis was the perfect excuse, and cover, for his abdication.

[@chips1889]

I disagree, he wanted Mrs Simpson to be Queen.

[@magnacz]

He was extremely bored with the duties he had to fullfil as the prince of Wales. Not very brighte by nature, more interested in fashion and older woman preferably other people's wifes. He called it kinging.

[@bettinazapkerodriguez5710]

Simplemente honesto

[@halibut1249]

After he abdicated, in the interviews he gave and in his public statements, he seemed to be going out of his way to impress listeners with his understanding of politics, govt, issues of the day, and the bigwigs and influencers, many of whom he recounted as knowing personally, as if to suggest he would have made a fine king....had he just been able to marry Wallis. But recall that he abdicated, after serving nine months in 1936, so he did have a try-out in the position, and perhaps decided it didn't suit him and he wanted out. Ironically, he wasn't happy being king, and it seems wasn't happy in his private life afterwards either.

[@bluegtturbo]

Who could blame him... Boring fucking job pretending to enjoy watching some boring ritual

[@zzzbbbooo]

Yes, it's odd isn't it? I've noted this in other interviews he's given also. Very stilted, very rehearsed.

[@jonathanwaggoner2265]

its now been revealed that the Archbishop of Canterbury was in league with his brother and sister in law to force him out. So he kind of did it to himself by under estimating Bertie.

[@mrFalconlem]

Yes look it up

[@gogogeedus]

so what who cares, he is doing is own thing,don't try and spoil his fairytail without the baggage. he's a nice guy who fell in love with a nice girl,nothing else matters.

[@MrBulky992]

@Petek Demircioglu Celebi No, it is not true: George VI had absolutely no wish to be king - it was forced on him because he was next in line and, being a dutiful son, he had no choice. His wife had no wish for him to be king either and blamed Edward for the early death of her husband. She could hardly have done so if George had been a willing conspirator. Baldwin (the PM) and Cosmo Gordon Lang (the Archbishop of Canterbury), on the other hand, did conspire: they had already determined that Edward was unsuitable for a variety of reasons and used Wallis Simpson as a convenient excuse to get rid of him.

[@10081918]

I cannot hear the name of Lord Beaverbrook without spontanously continue "... Siiiiiiiir Winston Churchil! Siiiiiiir Antony Eden! Clement Atlee! Henry Cooper! Lady Diana!" etc.

[@konnnnnnneeee]

In the end, the crown always wins!

[@jdaze1]

Someone should remind Harry of this.

[@gogogeedus]

@@jdaze1 Didn't win in Russia.

[@Flirri]

@@gogogeedus but in Bulgaria, we voted our Tsar back in!

[@micsomers]

Did win in America.

[@BillyBob-ec5ox]

To me, the one unforgivable thing Edward did was palling around with the Nazis while his brother was trying to hold down the fort. That’s really where Edward looks fatally flawed. Not because he gave up the throne. He knew his brother didn’t want the throne anymore than he did, but was put in a very tight spot. I can understand Edward not liking quite a bit of people in the Royal family. There’s no doubt a lot of snobbery involved. But George was a genuinely down to earth, good guy. He deserved better from his brother. The least he could have done was had his back, even if he cut contact from everyone else. Not hanging out with a psychopath.

[@bravesoul5743]

I agree with you on this one. Edward made a mistake sympathizing with the Nazi!!!!

[@elliottschertzer876]

Agree 100%

[@KateMiddelton]

I’m sorry to hear that you’ve fallen for the propaganda. Bertie and his wife were a very ambitious couple and they orchestrated a coup together with the prime minister and bishop of Canterbury. The whole Nazi thing is just smoke and mirrors. Entire aristocracy including the royal family at the time of Edwards visit to Germany felt that war against Germany was not a good idea and that they should try to appease him. Even the Prime Minister went to visit Hitler and see if they could negotiate, this was around the same time Edwards visit. Churchill was an outlier for knowing appeasement won’t work with hitler, and he managed to persuade parliament after many years, eventually became prime minister in charge of the war. There is no evidence at all that Edward had any contact with Nazis or showed any sympathy after his visit. All of it has been manufactured by royal historians who get their sources from the same royal family who orchestrated the coup.

[@askhowiknow5527]

A state visit with a lunatic dictator isn’t necessarily palling around…

[@nts821]

He looked and talked very regal.

[@thehonorablelordrevan7660]

nts821 yeah compare him to the younger royals, Edward is TRUE ROYALTY

[@rosemarie3784]

I love him! ♥️

[@mindspring57]

Some believe that if Germany had won the Battle of Britain, Edward and Wallis would have been installed as Vichy-style puppet monarchs.

[@Soulthinker2007]

Which is why they sent them to the Bahamas.

[@gogogeedus]

and some believe in the tooth fairy and easter bunny

[@hymatwat9412]

Not a chance

[@palastofhistory4026]

That's Highly unlikely

[@Jonathanbegg]

At 90, Winston was entering his tenth decade, not his ninth.

[@jdaze1]

Confuses alot of people the same way the centuries do (i.e., the 1200s are the 13th century).

[@SavvySide964]

In his mind : " That big meanie whacked my best buddy boohoohoo "

[@awesomedude584]

This is bizarre. Clearly he had been given the questions in advance and had the answers prepared and was reading them like a speech. A spoiled and entitled man to the end.

[@gogogeedus]

you didn't know him so how would you know.

[@NakedCryptoTrading]

He was a Prince, a King, an Emperor and then a Duke, that still gave him more entitlement than 99,9% of anyone on earth

[@lostindiancamp]

The Duke of Windsor was so angry at his family for not accepting Wallis, he was willing to do anything to get back at them. He acted like a spoiled brat not getting his way. He lied about his finances to get more money from them, so he could keep Wallis in jewelry.

[@A_10_PaAng_111]

Jody Sort of like how Prince Harry is today with his wife Meghan Markle. You ain't gonna tell me Harry wasn't angry at his family when he decided to marry Meghan Markle..

[@magnacz]

@@A_10_PaAng_111 no not when they married. Later when she wasn't defended and protected from the grotesque lies of the media he became angry at the system the courtiers that decided to put rocks in their shoes at every step. The RF internally have a very poor opinion of the press. Just look at Anne or Phillip over the years they see them as flees that they have to put up with unfortunately. No respect.

[@alejandrosotomartin9720]

He did a Harry and Meghan.

[@gogogeedus]

@@alejandrosotomartin9720 Harry was never in line for the throne,unit after Charles and William so no,but kinda.

[@lisacassar2321]

does anyone have a clip of wallis speaking? i would love to see them both in an interview.....he may have loved wallis but his country wasnt what he wanted,,,albert did not want this yet did what he knew he must & persevered god bless albert

[@thejoyofsoxmovie7211]

Here's a 25-minute interview of her and her husband: kzbin.info/www/bejne/f2GVl416mZJ1eMU

[@mohamedbinelias8045]

Thank you very much

[@Wobdifurousness]

King George VI was a very good King and a very good man. I am glad for my country that King George was our monarch and not this fellow, Edward VIII was a fatally weak man, I don't know if he really was a traitor, but I think he was dangerous and I am they sent him to the Bahamas out of the way.

[@Norfolkgal22]

Dude, you've got some serious problems... Reading your previous post. If you are German, why do you give a shit about the British monarchy. Troll is the word that springs to mind.

[@Al_o_bri]

Norfolkgal22 maybe because the royal family are German?

[@dezboss]

I presume that this was broadcast around the time of Churchill's death?

[@karldelavigne8134]

No, it seems it was around the time of his 90th birthday.

[@nicokakes4736]

It's David Dickinson

[@cspike9061]

where's the rest of the interview?

[@Ferr1963]

00:30 It was July nineteen hundred and fourteen; Is this a posh way to say 1914? Somebody could help me to understand this expression?

[@iwfgb]

yes that is exactly what it is

[@ianthain8638]

Nineteen hundred and fourteen is English. 1914 is mathematics.

[@zenden6564]

Ferr1963 actually in formal English it was in antique times including "in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred......" so he was being brief.

[@evm6177]

Saying in full sounds better & important. More worth remembering. 🍷

[@harryleid]

That was Edward before. D he said what was in the vision.

[@johneunson]

yes, there's a clip on here where she tells of meeting edward.

[@johneunson]

we would be speaking german and celebrating hitler's birthday.

[@iTube22100]

I would also like to have such jewerly without paying ! Just wonder why Cartier, Van Cliff, Winston etc. continued to supply him ... or he changed suppliers at the purpose ?

[@mindspring57]

Actually, I think it is improved by the admixture. William seems to have a lot more sense than his father, and his children may even be better.

[@lordburlap4514]

He "abdicated" the throne.....he never "relinquished" it.....BIG difference.....

[@grandmasterezioauditore982]

The Duke called Churchill "Cry baby"

[@robertbeveridge1691]

Thank goodness this man abdicated

[@stucardiff1969]

Why is this not subtitled so that Deaf and Hard of Hearing people can follow what is being said?

[@raymonddaubney3612]

Stuart Parkinson Because it is not worth knowing about.

[@mikaeljvabom67]

Master churchill was a great man and if anyone says against it then bugger off

[@zyeyo1]

For what is a man, if he is not allowed to live with the woman he loves and constitutionally not allowed to speak and say what he means.

[@bronzerat012]

Totally agree!

[@zzzbbbooo]

He always comes across as the most oddly stilted, bizarre interviewee ever - almost as if he's reading everything from an idiotboard. So glad he got out when he did.

[@rah62]

Look at 1:44 - he WAS reading.

[@hoodooguri]

He talks as if he had been a man of importance and some stature in his life. He wasn't.

[@RADIUMGLASS]

This is real footage. Not an actor.

[@Norfolkgal22]

For 11 months, never actually crowned.

[@Norfolkgal22]

Who suggested it was?

[@patthonsirilim5739]

still the commander in cheif and head of state of more or less around 20 percent of the world land area at that time

[@babs66]

He served 25 years as Prince of Wales and during ww1

[@zanealpha4075]

Heil to the king love is all we need

[@sixbells99]

The Royal family are paid for by the taxpayer, but the deal is they represent the very best of the United Kingdom, that their behavior sets and example for the common person to strive towards. But if they behavior like common people, then they should have the same treatment as "common" people. They should have no special privilege nor lands or money. The Duke of Windsor behavior was like that of a normal person, he fell in love with someone and wanted to marry them, if he is nothing more than a normal person then he should be treated as such. Yet throughout his life he lived in luxury and a generous allowance by the taxpayer who he so savagely let down. A weak spineless man who was willing to take all the benefits of royal life but none of the duties.

[@willhovell9019]

My father and I (not the King) , Churchill and Max Beaverbrook showing poor judgement yet again. Churchill was a great coalition war leader but his mistakes over the decades were notorious and very costly in human life , suffering and political resentment amongst the people of South Wales , London, the working classes and the empire , particularly Indians and ANZACs

[@truthlifefishing1730]

This not a lie, it is an absolute betrayal of truth.

[@gregwalker1913]

Just don't mention Gallipoli.

[@dezboss]

Yep, it was us who invaded Poland after all wasn't it?

[@elsaseaford]

a social climber...??? You mean a former King who gave up his thrown.... a social climber... that's erm an interesting theory right there...

[@dezboss]

Of course, it was us who invaded Poland after all.

[@markdoery7932]

Churchill couldn’t stand the former Edward VIII. Despised his Nazi sympathies and the Abdication effect. But diplomatic words shine through from the former King🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

[@MrBulky992]

Churchill supported Edward VIII during the abdication crisis and spoke up for him. The speech to the country delivered by Edward VIII on the radio was written by Churchill ("I cannot bear the heavy burden...without the support of the woman I love" etc.). Churchill turned against him after the abdication when he realised his mistake. Edward's support of the Nazis continued, his 'state visit' to Germany, his passing of intelligence in WWII when in uniform on the British Army to the Germans prior to the invasion of France, desertion from his post in France in World War II and flight to Portugal (Churchill threatened him with court martial if he failed to return to his duties), his defeatism during his tenure of governor of The Bahamas and his illegal currency transactions following the War. There is enough documentary evidence against him including intelligence documents from the Nazi era in Germany which name the "Herzog von Windsor" as the source of vital information. There are also letters in the archives of Windsor Castle never released. These were obtained from a castle in southern Germany on secret instructions from Buckingham Palace. The deputation included Sir Anthony Blunt - these letters had to be found before the American occupying forces found them. Let us also not forget the cruel and callous comments he made when he was younger about his youngest brother, Prince John. He was self-indulgent and self-absorbed and the word "duty" meant nothing to him, unlike his brother George VI.

[@MrBulky992]

Hitler was also personable and likeable in private, so it is said. Those characteristics did not make him a good man.

[@IrishCarney]

Churchill was almost alone in the British establishment in supporting Edward in the abdication crisis. It was yet another reason the establishment disliked Churchill, considering him to have (despite formidable gifts in writing, oratory) poor judgement. But yes, once the abdication happened, Churchill swung around immediately to give his full support to the new king. And Churchill's strong anti-Nazi stance also created a rift, such as how Churchill threatened to have Edward court-martialed if he did not return home to England rather than hanging around in Portugal (a den of Nazi spies and intrigue).

[@markdoery08]

@@IrishCarney All very true. Winston was a true patriot and pragmatist amongst other traits. Duty and protection of the Crown was his sim. Even if the establishment weren’t in agreement with his method. Drawing a long bow perhaps has an input into his crushing 1945 loss in the UK Polls🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

[@markdoery08]

*aim

[@johnjessop6169]

Why did we only declare war on Germany then?

[@Lockstock95]

Why were his answers rehearsed

[@miriamhavard7621]

Getting along in his years?

[@nevanovna]

The blood line of Diana was more Royal than the Royal family,she descends from Charles 1 and the Merovigian Kings of France.As for Mrs Simpson,she was just a super nanny,who was lumbered with Edward,she missed the boat,she really thought she would be queen!

[@miriamhavard7621]

She did alright. She'd been relatively "poor" in Baltimore.

[@johneunson]

yes, she should be canonised. he would have been a disaster.....he acted like a spoilt child and, yet, we know he was not. it would appear he saw little of his parents.

[@santapermalloo7147]

the sod cant' even have a personal opinion, he is readig from words prepared by a third party.

[@gdcat777]

Didn't she come from money already? If so, why would she need to dig for gold? At any rate, why does everyone have to meet your expectations of what a human should be? Who are you?

[@gmvtv4648]

Where Churchill ?

[@randymanmaximus8419]

Passed at that point likely

[@columbaiona3081]

I think it is completely untrue he was a traitor to his Country - he was though not cut out to be King and he knew it was not for him - Wallis he loved and the burden of being a King and not having her for his wife was not what he was prepared to go through with. Please recall that he served honourably in WWI and did his best to get into the Front Lines as much as he could.

[@babs66]

Yes 25 yrs people conveniently forget as Prince of Wales

[@lindahalperin2009]

He certainly was a traitor and a Nazi sympathizer. He also did not want to be King and was happy to leave that job to his younger brother. Who can blame him, it's a crappy job but he spent the rest of his life partying and knew nothing of duty, a word you rarely hear today. I find him to be a thoroughly unlikable character and the world ducked a big one when he quit. I believe Wallis was for him, an easy out but you might not agree.

[@columbaiona3081]

@@lindahalperin2009 Well in what way do you think he was a 'Traitor'?

[@RedZHunter]

@Cristabel Montague Noah? Seriously? Noah didn't fucking exist, and Galileo had nothing to do with establishing that the Earth is spherical.

[@TyrSkyFatherOfTheGods]

The biggest favour he ever did Britain, the Dominions, and the Empire was to abdicate.

[@global001]

He seems a bit over dramatic & not a particularly confident public speaker.

[@JohnJohnson-uw8dm]

Why?

[@jointhe6461]

It's decade not decayed.

[@matthewlaurence3121]

I doubt that, the germans prefered to install native people in existing institutions to rule over conquored nations (not so with Poland and the East), everything would be the same, only the british army would be replaced and nazi costoms introduced. Parliment, courts would continue, and german would be a favourite language taught in schools. They respected the language and culture of the british as they did the french. Though the birthday part is proberbly right.

[@hunkhk]

traitor!

[@gotch09]

Uh, you noticed too,huh?

[@sudaev]

Whenever the subject of British royalty comes up in discussions with Brits, I always tell them that my favorite was the Duchess of Windsor (Wallis Simpson). I also will troll them by continually referring to her as "her royal highness".

[@andygupta2757]

Why not refer to her as the Queen!

[@gogogeedus]

Do you mind If I use your idea,I love to getting people going like a top.

[@henman09]

A Misjudged Man, A Man who knew pain and anguish.

[@barryallen3883]

He always talks like he's in a public speech

[@SpaceGhost67]

Reading a script, floridly rhetorical, in deference to Churchill, whose twofold mission in his case was to hide him under the bed and pretend to spank his German bottom.

[@joliva30maple]

This guy is no George VI, Britain falls if this guy was the King during WW2!

[@javieranguiano9555]

How can you trust or consider someone who doesn't look at you in the eye, his acting like a puppet reading the lines from his script LOL.

[@mdwilliams79]

He was Edward VIII. And who are you, other than a troll with too much time on their hands?

[@Norfolkgal22]

He was never actually crowned king though... To be fair, he was a very controversial figure. Accusations of Nazism and all sorts.

[@babs66]

It's thought he had Aspergers

[@sporkfindus4777]

Is it just me, or does he have a slight south-east regional accent in his voice towards the end of this clip? Definitely not RP. The interviewer has more plums in his mouth than the former king of England. I wonder why! Maybe his naval career. I think if he was going to lay into a British prime minister, it would be Stanley Baldwin.

[@SilverToster]

i always wonder why queen didnt like her uncle because he married 2 times american divorcee but hey because of that she was a queen because her father was a king and dies

[@willhenry5385]

he Nazi king. Loved them.

[@gogogeedus]

but the Nazi party wasn't bad then and who killed Tzar Nicholas,Edwards cousin?

[@mindspring57]

If he were a man, he would have told them to go to hell, and he would have married whomoever he pleased. Can you imagine anyone telling Henry VIII he could not marry someone? The problem with Edward VIII is that he was a wimp and a traitor, and Britain was well rid of him, for whatever reason his removal could be accomplished.

[@miriamhavard7621]

He WAS a man, and married whomever he wanted.

[@IrishCarney]

Traitor perhaps. But wimp, for being a constitutional monarch rather than trying to be an absolute one? Britain wouldn't put up with an absolute monarch anymore even in the 1640s, let alone the 1930s.

[@harryleid]

Actuall Why bothers skiing the question In anyway one cousin or two cousins. We Should Change the world but they can't.

[@mindspring57]

Amen!

[@sghu11]

A brilliant man .. one of the greatest regrets of the 20th century. True king.

[@ahargrov1]

He was a traitor and a coward what are you talking about?

[@sghu11]

@@ahargrov1 if he was a coward he would have done what people told him to and marry who ever they asked him to. He was a true king and respected by the most powerful people including Winston Churchill in the true sense and not just as a nominal head. It was the insecurity of the Royals that followed (queen mother)that gave him his bad reputation. And they were right in being insecure given the superstar he was back then.

[@lesigh1749]

@@sghu11 Does that include his sympathetic support of Hitler, and his notions that we ought not to get involved in the war? MI5 were tapping his phones long before he abdicated, and nothing to do with the Queen mother that followed him.

[@sghu11]

@@lesigh1749 the royal family after him had their own machinery to make sure he and his image were kept at bay. Hitler was supported earlier on because he was anti communist. And not wanting another war is a bad idea in your book?

[@lesigh1749]

@@sghu11 You are trying very hard to maintain a fiction. When he was Prince David, his own parents were bitterly disappointed in his attitude and behaviour also. he was a womanizer and a playboy, with dubious taste in friends and no responsibility. MI5 didn't just tap anyone's phones, they did with him because they thought he was passing sensitive information to the Nazis, long after it became clear what sort of threat they were.

[@homounsapiens1287]

why this guy always sound like he inhaled a royal helium balloon:?

[@henman09]

As true as your statement is, that doesn't mean he's not fascinating.

[@meirwise1107]

Love is blind and can turn you into a real idiot! He would have made a fine King but threw it all away for that, ugly, twice divorced gold digger. Shame.

[@MusicLover-wt7tx]

We lost a great King, as the Duke of York was an alcoholic, stammering man given to terrible rages, they looked to to the other brothers as a possible king. The Duke of Kent was brighter than the rest of the brothers but had affairs with both men and women, as a drug addict the Prince of Wales took care of him whilst he was weaned off heroin and cocaine. the Duke of Gloucester was also an alcoholic and despatched to Australia to avoid further embarrassment. All the lies and half truths which were told about the Duke of Windsor were merely to prop up a weak and very ill King George VIth. His wife having failed in her many attempts to marry the Prince of Wales, had to settle for the next in line and she was determined to be Queen at any cost.

[@EEDiazL]

+Windsor Edward Who confessed to you all this, Queen Mary, Princess Mary, or The Duke of York himself?

[@minafanelli8931]

Let's NOT forget little John! The son this family hid from the world... Adorable boy...Sad, but I am not surprised. Prince Edward wrote letters about this brother John he loved so dearly,to Wallis Simpson.... Messes up big time.. King George was disgusting, as was his wife...

[@keziahkn9973]

+Incredible Mann Incredible History ?

[@maryt2196]

very 'sad about Prince John....but that's what was done back then....people were hidden away, denied.....in all classes of society...

[@RADIUMGLASS]

Yes that's what was done. The relative was still taken care of but kept out of sight. The original "Changeling" from 1980 staring George C. Scott tells that story well. Disabled son kept in an attic room.

[@davidgoldin5759]

Although Churchill supported this jerk, he was the complete opposite Edward. Churchill was brave and always ready to do his duty as he saw it. Edward was unintelligent, self-centered, and waiting for the Nazis to invade England and put him back on the throne as a figure-head King.

[@lordcawdorofmordor2549]

His voice is surprisingly nasally

[@AdmiralBlake]

he was more the fool than the traitor

[@Domhangairt]

Winston Churchill was an Ashkenazi Jew through his mother Jeanette Jerome, and he was a compulsive gambler who was bankrupt in the 1930s. He was rescued by wealthy Ashkenazi Jews on the condition that he lobbied Parliament for a war with Hitler's Germany- which no one wanted- least of all Hitler. The real enemy in 1939 was Josef Stalin- he was a real threat to Europe and the British Empire. But people like me get called "revisionist historians" when all I'm telling is the simple truth. The war with geramny was totally unnecessary, and was the result of a huge propaganda exercise. Also, Britain could have the Ashkenazi Jews much more effectively by bringing Hitler under their influence through an alliance against Stalin, then by shutting him out and sealing the fate of all those he put in concentration camps - which did not only include Jews.

[@RedZHunter]

@Christabel Montague You see, you're lying now. Out of your teeth, there is no archaeological evidence to prove noah's ark existed and I don't respect YOUR views on heliocentrism as you throw it out so casually without understanding what it means. As for replying like this, grow up and stop crying over the way someone replies on KZbin comments.

[@justmanic9673]

Eddy should have stayed out of the public eye after the abdication

[@justmanic9673]

He liked the attention but disliked the work

[@faviolabloisa4696]

He was such a nice person . but badly. Treated ..i don't see nothing wrong to leave everything for love .Love is the root of all happiness xx whether if he made the right choice with Wallis ,, I don't know I heard so much garbage .. but his intentions were nobel!

[@backtothefutureman1]

He is no traitor.

[@kevinmorgan8534]

Try reading some history.

[@backtothefutureman1]

@@kevinmorgan8534 no you should.

[@adrianconnew5309]

Should have been hung for treason.

[@wolfganghasenmaier8350]

Churchill is far less impressive to me than Bronson, Ray Winstone, this Duke here or the Gypsyking Tyson Fury. Like 1000 times less impressive. Nobles know people and mentailities, that`s why were the leaders for a super long time.

[@IzzyferX]

jealous much?

[@SamMak123]

Love him. They can say what they like about him, but the truth is he gave up everything. The sun didn’t set on his empire and he gave it all up. No one else could, would do that. The greed in everyone else can’t comprehend this and therefore come up with lame reasons to demonise and scrutinise him. He is the KING!

[@LordlyJeremy]

Does anyone else notice the weird pseudo-Cockney accent in his voice? I guess rich Brits affecting lower-class speech is nothing new.

[@MusicLover-wt7tx]

As Prince of Wales, he was more concerned about the people than his father. He said he learned how to speak like Londoners.

[@barbabach6540]

Edward? Super człowiek i przywalony politycznymi sprawami ,kierowanymi wiadomo przez jaką nację. Szkoda, że tacy ludzie nie rządzą, wspomagając się odpowiednimi wielkimi ludżmi? Świat byłby normalny i przyjazny , zdatny do życia. Szkoda ,że niszczono tak Wielkiego Teslę ,a dzieci znają dziś wyłącznie niemal nazwisko Einsteina /bardziej metafizyka wg Tesli/, choć nie dorównuje Tesli ,jeśli idzie o postęp dla lepszego życia ludzi. Równania niebotyczne ,nic nie dające ludziom i błądzące w jakby "sztuce dla sztuki', teorie nieprawdziwe itd. - zaprzątają bezkrytycznie do dziś głowy pokoleń ? Wierzę Tesli, który powiedział: "teoria m.in. Einsteina / bardziej metafizyka/ jest jak żebrak ubrany w purpurę, którego ignoranci biorą za króla" ./Wg w/w NT, eter i oddziaływanie w nim zaprzecza wielu teoriom itd./?