Allied bombing of Dresden: Legitimate target or war crime? | DW News

[@Ballinalower]

As a three year old child in England in 1944 I stood in the garden with my grandmother and mother and aunt watching hundreds of American bombers get into formation and head off for Germany. My grandmother said. "Oh the poor Germans." One of the other women rebuked her. "How can you say that after what they did to us?" To which my grandmother replied "Those planes are not going to drop bombs on the men who dropped bombs on us. They are going to drop bombs on women and children just like us." The horrible truth of that made me cry then as it does now. I like DW but I am disappointed that they belittle the memory of the thousands of women and children who died in Dresden at the end of this piece by using it to attack the far right. Carpet bombing is not about right or left it is about the cruel indiscriminate slaughter of innocent people. Please DW use some restraint and just mourn all those lives lost, not try and excuse it.

[@borisborkovic8894]

@@christonefeltzs5149 jesus

[@borisborkovic8894]

@@christonefeltzs5149 bruh you didnt understand me

[@Querian]

@@christonefeltzs5149 lmao, still valid point. We won.

[@DisconnectedUSB]

@@christonefeltzs5149 yknow that america owes the world over 30,000,000,000,000,000 dollars in debt right

[@pikachupi3364]

My man was 81 and still remember that day. Your grandmother sounds wise. R.I.P. Chad grandma. (There's no way she's not dead right. Right????)

[@andrewisjesus]

"They were targetting civilians clearly" ok so you said it was a war crime.

[@gregcameron6047]

@@pissiole5654 Very well said. Thanks.

[@TrotzdemDeutsch]

@@pissiole5654 "We started attacking targets in Germany before the Germans did. This is a historical fact." (J.M. Spaight, state secretary in the british Air Ministry in his book "Bombing vindicated")

[@pissiole5654]

@@TrotzdemDeutsch yeah strategic targets of military importance, not area bombing of residential areas like oh i don't know, Coventry?

[@bolivar2153]

@@TrotzdemDeutsch Your quote is incorrect and taken out of context, a tactic frequently used by those seeking to promote apologia for the actions of another.

[@Anon1gh3]

@@pissiole5654 They were targeting civilian hospitals and residents. Churchill wanted to send a clear message to Germany - they weren't in any way limited by Conscience and they will win at all costs, by any means necessary. And that's just what they did. Never for a moment did they stop or slow their attack on the innocent. Then they're lorded as the greatest heroes of modern history.

[@arnoldjr200040]

I was stationed in Germany for five years the fact that they were able rebuild that city is amazing I visited Dresden while living there you cannot tell a bomb was ever dropped there. Germans are truly a amazing people.

[@georgewallace8933]

bunch of racists

[@1Corinthians6Verses9thru11]

I visited Dresden when stationed in Germany (mostly) between 2002 and 2005, and you could definitely still tell it had been bombed, by some current ruins and some almost "futuristic" refurbishing upon older ruins (seemingly "anachronistic").

[@karimtemri1664]

the are particularly amawing at gassing

[@ruhri0411]

@@1Corinthians6Verses9thru11 These buildings, inappropriate for the city, were erected during the communist dictatorship. East Germany was poor and could not afford reconstruction. Reconstruction only came after reunification, when a lot of money from West Germany was invested in the East. At least the communists left the rubble pile of the Church of Our Lady as it was after the collapse of the church following the devastating bombing raids in 1945. The reconstruction of Dresden is far from complete and perhaps in the future Stalinist buildings will be demolished and replaced with reconstructed buildings.

[@ericzhou-y4t]

@@ruhri0411 I thought the intention of keeping the ruins is to memorise the launch of WW2. To some extent, a relic recording what British did in Germany. Apparently, Britain was enemy of the soviet union. The reason was not East Germany was poor. Similarly in China, there were arguments whether the Summer Palace should be rebuilt. The consent was not to rebuild it, just use the ruins to memorise the consequence of being a sick man of Asia. China is rich now, but never forgets the history.

[@overlordb1989]

Geneva convention more like Geneva suggestion.

[@Cybop-xd9mm]

Geneva who?

[@patriciabrenner9216]

The Germans respected it?

[@lilzp9106]

@@patriciabrenner9216 no they didnt. Neither did anyone else.

[@patriciabrenner9216]

@@lilzp9106 wello action, reaction.

[@alastairlaw1192]

@@Cybop-xd9mm hail bomber harris they deserved it

[@ncwoodworker]

The people of Germany had to be told in this worst way, that the world will never tolerate what they inflected upon the world.

[@antoniospanayiotou8619]

Open your eyes... it is happening today, just go visit Lybia, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen......

[@hegemonys]

We don't have to visit. We wait for another 70 odd years and will watch it on KZbin.

[@xponen]

@@hegemonys there's always that KZbin video about Syrian/Russian bomber bombing Syrian city, where civilian dies, and buildings got destroyed, soo many have been destroyed the whole city looks like was struck by some massive earthquake.

[@gushrustalniy8533]

@@xponen What's illegal in SYRIAN bomber in SYRIA? Anyway more legal than American bases in Germany

[@rehmsmeyer]

Yeah, but they're brown. Or so you deny the fact of their skin color? Fug you, we have a military industrial complex that has been starving, let them eat oil.

[@russell4658]

@@rehmsmeyer What are you trying to say?

[@radiousis49]

War is terrible. Let’s try not to have another one.

[@xeasygoin]

Trevor7775 OK then.

[@angelusvastator1297]

What about in self-defense?

[@winchesterchua3311]

@@angelusvastator1297 Ok.

[@johnnyhun1]

well, in africa there are still ongoing wars for decades lol

[@didit546]

Ok

[@Sk_max-k3m]

Very high number of civilian casualties and few strategic targets seems that Dresden bombing was a crime against humanity and very controversial too.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

There were not "2 sides" but rather several conflicting agendas. Even in war, as well as during peace, "a side" doesn't exist, irrelevant of what the "history books" tell us. *Reality? There were "3 sides" on the "side" of the so-called "Allies" alone.* That makes a large part of your comment re. "sides" a "false premise" (please google false premise" in case you're not familiar with the concept). Sad reality? There were three "sides" on the "side" of the "winners" alone, and who would *really win* would be decided after the war, by boring men in boring back rooms making "deals". No leverage = your "side" would lose. "Dresden" and all other cities "area bombed" out of existence would have *2 "winners"* only. The American Century. Communism. The British Empire in the form of "London", which advocated it, would not be one of the "winners" of it's own strategy of "flattening entire cities" (of which Dresden was only one), when the war was over, despite what all the emotional argumentation wishes to claim.

[@Sk_max-k3m]

@@ralphbernhard1757 Most of the strategic targets were outside the city,it seems unnecessarily bombing on the civilian. German soldiers were already retreating and bombing of Dresden at the later stage of war is something unnecessary.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

@@Sk_max-k3m To add to the above: The decision to "area bomb" entire cities was not only immoral, but also counterproductive. The "price tag" for London came after the war... Logically, also fatally flawed: Was your grandfather or or father killed by Wittmann in his Tiger tank, on that day in Normandie in 1944? Was he killed or wounded in the Hochwald Gap, or anywhere else in Northern Europe? Was he shot down by a Messerschmidt, or by one of the famous 88-mm guns? *If not, how about cut to ribbons by an MG-42 machine gun?* Was he shot or badly wounded by the standard German infantry rifle at the time, the Kar-98k? At the time of the Dresden attack, the Mauser Works in Oberndorf in in the south of Germany, barely an hours flying time from the front lines at the time, was still fully functional. It was one of the major German small arms manufactures, including the the feared MG-42, and the old-fashioned but reliable Kar-98k. Instead of frying 25,000 or 30,000 women and kids in Dresden in February 1945, maybe the RAF should have targeted the Mauser Works. At this point in the war, the complete destruction or serious damage to the factory would have meant thousands of machine guns and rifles would have been either directly destroyed, or indirectly lost to production. Thousands of German soldiers, still viciously defending Germany, would have been left without adequate means to do so. At this late stage of the war, with the front lines only a few hundred miles away, there would have hardly been an incentive for the Germans to try and repair the plant, especially not if the factory had been hit successively in a fully coordinated USAAF (daylight) and RAF (nighttime) attack. Mauser was one of the world's most famous arms manufactures of the world, yet strangley anough, it was simply forgotten.

[@Sk_max-k3m]

@@ralphbernhard1757 So you mean to say killing of innocent German civilian by British and American in Dresden was a revenge for London Bombing?? 🤔

[@ralphbernhard1757]

@@Sk_max-k3m No. Fighting a war on civilians was policy for London (the Area Bombing Directives). Harris fought tooth and nail to prioritize city centers (civilians), even if the weather permitted precision attacks on specific targets, which Harris had given the derogatory term "panacea". Harris didn't want to attack factories. He loved the idea of attacking civilians.

[@MrLathor]

The Germans should have surrendered after Operation Overlord was successful. There was absolutely no hope at that point for a German victory. Every death after that had no purpose whatsoever and could have been prevented. Most German military leaders knew this and still fought on.

[@surebuddysure6070]

The germans had no hope way before d-day. The Germans were in full retreat in the eastern front and there is not enough resources or manpower to have a successful counter offensive in the east. Germany was doomed since the end of 1943.

[@freekjobse7051]

As long as the mustache man was in charge, there was no hope of peace. So he had to go first, which fortunally happened.

[@pizzawarrior4974]

@@freekjobse7051 im late but i wonder if operation valkyrie suceeded

[@ralphbernhard1757]

They knew there'd be another Versailles, so they thought they might as well deserve it this time.

[@controversialpsychologist3052]

@@freekjobse7051 Churchill was the warmonger

[@CascadianPatriotII]

You say Dresden, I say Warsaw. You say Hamburg, I say the Blitz. You say Budapest, I say Leningrad. You say Tokyo, I say Nanking. Don't dish out what you can't take.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

*What about Warsaw, Budapest and Leningrad?* Guess what? Not even two years after WW2 and you would have gladly nuked them... Nanjing? I guess all you'll need today to nuke them to be able to thump your chest and chant "got what you deserved" is someone whispering "Chy-naaah" in your ear...

[@bolivar2153]

@@ralphbernhard1757 "Everybody got what they deserved." - Ralph Bernhard, June 2021

[@bolivar2153]

@@ralphbernhard1757 "The only criminal thing about Coventry and the bankrupcy [sic] of London was that it didn't happen soon enough." - Ralph Bernhard, May 2021

[@sebastianschrader838]

“Don’t dish out what you cant take” is not applicable to civilian populations not participating in the war. That’s just murder lmfao

[@Dale-TND]

shalom

[@ChuckN0rr1st]

What most seem to forget to mention is, that the bombs were designed to kill (not destroy or injure). There was an initial wave if carpet bombing that cleared the housing roofs and another wave of fire bombs to set everything on fire. They were well aware of what they were doing and the war was pretty much over by that point. It was a last chance for British revenge....

[@seamusoflatcap]

Chuck : the attack was carried out at the request of Stalin. Dresden was a hub in the transport of troops and weapons etc to the eastern front. Was there any element of revenge? Maybe, and so what? After everything the Germans had done is it any surprise? As Bomber Harris said "As you have sown the wind, so shall you reap the whirlwind."

[@ChuckN0rr1st]

@@seamusoflatcap That's some great logics there. Bombing of Dresden took place two months before the Germans lost. There were so many bombers involved that Dresden was flattened just after three days (about ~2500 heavy bombers). Destroying the housing of half a million people and a culture rich city sure was only a strategic (military) decision. Or it might have been an act to inflict so many public casulties to break the moral of the people. But at that time nobody cared about the Geneva convention anyways, why shoul've Britain?

[@seamusoflatcap]

@@ChuckN0rr1st Thanks. Plus there were factories in Dresden engaged in war work. At the time, the Allies weren't to know exactly when the end of the war in Europe would end. Obviously they knew it would be soon but meanwhile the Germans kept fighting not only on the ground but also launching V1 and V2 rockets. Dresden was a legitimate target. What happened was tragic but then so was the whole war. People criticising the bombing do so from the comfort of an armchair in peace time and with the benefit of hindsight.

[@seamusoflatcap]

@@ralphbernhard1757 I never said he was a nice chap.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

@@seamusoflatcap Correct, but "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" is a slogan that cost the Brits their Empire. Did you know the slogan is false dichotomy? Even without hindsight, it was a mistake to isolate France and completely destroy Germany. Two key elements in the balance of power.

[@sjaakdewinter6258]

Ask that to people from London, Warsaw or Rotterdam.

[@kakadukif1676]

Or maybe also the people in Rome, Copenhagen, Oslo, Helsinki,Bucharest who were part of the "strategic Bombing"

[@sjaakdewinter6258]

@@kakadukif1676 Birmingham, Coventry and also a city in Spain... or> make wind and you get storm. Churchill said> we gave them an extra dosis for what they did to us, That s war!

[@andrewalbrandt7585]

Britain killed over 2-4 million citizens with bombings, Germany killed roughly 400,000-600,000

[@markcarey8426]

@@andrewalbrandt7585 Germany started a war that killed 50 million. Crawl back under yr rock.

[@LauraOvTheePsychicYouth]

@@andrewalbrandt7585 source?

[@S2Tubes]

The only unforgivable crime in war is losing.

[@benfennell6842]

@Führer 将軍 Shogün maybe the edgiest username pfp combo in existence

[@unserland6948]

Hello, I am german!

[@coolddude6563]

"History is writen by the victors"

[@Mitch_Richard44]

Revisionist stories are written by apologists.

[@dieflutkommt]

And look what the empire gained ? That bum Churchill sold out the empire for Eastern Europe to be communist ; enabling the Cold War and thus giving way to red China. The empire is no more and Brits will be a minority in their own country in a free decades. Karma.

[@ssobergruppenfuhrerpeanut3674]

True

[@ronprater4715]

Made possible by evil aggression. Germany deserved worse in my opinion.

[@cato9939]

@لبنان العظيم 🇱🇧 The Great Lebanon im english and i agree england didnt get so much from being kind. Churchill was a war mongering alcoholic mudering fanatic.. ww2 was orchestrated by the ysnks and many other countries. The joooos was murdered by the yanks

[@Teboski78]

No such thing as “the good guys” in war. If you’re looking for morality you’re looking in the wrong place.

[@charlessanders7972]

This war was the exception. Emphatically so.

[@Teboski78]

@@charlessanders7972 Nah they weren’t really *the good guys*. They all just happened to be fighting much much much worse guys

[@ajcso7844]

@@Teboski78 And because the bad guys where much much worse we are the good guys.

[@Teboski78]

@@ajcso7844 *least bad guys

[@ajcso7844]

@@Teboski78 You do not need to be a saint to be the good guys. The difference between good people and bad people is that good people feel bad when they do bad things.

[@rogermarsh9806]

I seem to recall the German people were asked if they wanted total war, they said yes, that’s what total war looks like.

[@tempo5366]

I absolutely love this. Do you believe they held a vote or something?

[@godlink4186]

@@tempo5366welll…. Yes?

[@dafeekielelliott2442]

Its crazy to me how many people don't know that Germany had sent multiple peace offers to Britain which were all ignored by Churchill. In fact many peace activists were arguably illegally arrested in Britain.

[@dafeekielelliott2442]

@@tempo5366 Total war was waged by Churchill first.

[@kindlingking]

But who were you to deliver that "total war" to them? If you think you had moral rights to incinerate their cities because of a couple of bombs, how far should've USSR went?

[@RackHasAttacked]

People saying this is a war crime but they should look at what happend to Warsaw 1944-45 nothing was left of Warsaw

[@Etzelsschizo]

Didn't know kids and women flight in planes.

[@incubi51]

Does war-crimes in Warsaw exclude one occurring in Dresden?

[@RackHasAttacked]

@@incubi51 of course not because dresden wasn't a war crime

[@ironsandhammers359]

yeah soviets killed more polish people than the germans ever did

[@gianmariacelardi8580]

@@incubi51 yes.

[@spacejamsham2440]

I find it quite interesting that people talk about this a lot more then Nanking does...

[@crumpetcommandos779]

It's because the Japanese are seen as the victims of WW2 because they got nuked so no one talks about Nanking lolol

[@niccolofattori4393]

It's also a German TV, which reasonably deals with German events from a German perspective. I don't see anything wrong with that.

[@Tal__]

wow, you are very smart! you must have a very high iq to talk about something that other people aren't. (it's definately not because nanking is completely irrelevant to this discussion and talking about it is quite thoughtless)

[@saeedvazirian]

Nanking shouldnt be spoken about more because it wasnt done by the US or UK. Nanking is irrelevant.

[@Jacksparrow-zf9tn]

And artifical bengal famine

[@ROMA--AETERNA]

_Why in the world are they continuously talking about the “right wing”…?!_ I thought they were going to discuss the historical event.

[@theurbanexperience6787]

Cause they are trying to remove the right wing as a whole, I never understand why, but its like they just want to make everyone conform to their political stance instead of the 'political liberties' that everyone talks about.

[@matthewdavies269]

@@theurbanexperience6787 You are watching a documentary about WW2 and you "don't understand why" the right wing is a bad thing. Do you not see the irony in that?

[@ROMA--AETERNA]

@@matthewdavies269 , _enemy in WWII = the “right wing”…!?_ You're not that simple, are you?? 😳

[@FlyByWire1]

@@theurbanexperience6787 is this a serious question or satire? I honestly can’t tell.

[@hotsaucejosh8982]

@KZbin Netizen Definitely not lol

[@thetruth495]

Targeting civilians with mass bombing was, of course, a war crime, but in war the victors are never 'guilty'. Guilt depends on whether you lose or win - the losers are always guilty.

[@johanesgumabo17]

Yes ... agree

[@thetruth495]

@Johnny Myers Just a meaningless statement. Lazy.

[@michaelengel3407]

@Johnny Myers Did all citizens of Dresden who died really sow the wind ? Quotes from the hebrew bible do not turn a crime into a "higher call"

[@michaekrynicki8330]

while the truth germans defenatly were guilty of war crimes

[@thetruth495]

@@michaekrynicki8330 As were the allies, but the allies won and wrote the history books.

[@dennisdevries2226]

Gravity did this

[@awbrothers3067]

🤣

[@1wun1]

Lmfaoo

[@Graymenn]

prove that mass attracts mass

[@James-2248]

Wind helped do this

[@henryseidel5469]

Obviously gravity has caused a lot of damage to your brain.

[@jr8163]

Germany started bombing british cities in WW1 and started doing the same thing in WW2 with no reguard to who were killed,we gave them some of there own medicine in WW2 hence a 1000 bomber raids that flatened their cities as for innocent people there has never been a war that did not involve innocent people the ones who start it are to blame.

[@Rosa01010101]

Then you cant complain about "muh innocent people" being killed by the germans, because clearly that isnt important, only who "started" it

[@JustFun-fe7ux]

Both are war crimes. End of the story.

[@StayTunedReviews]

Anytime civilians are targeted during war, it raises certain ethical questions. With that being said, you reap what you sew. Germany during WW2 Gaines a reputation for targeting Allied civilians, starting the Holocaust and mistreating POWs. They broke the rules and they paid the price with interest.

[@michaelengel3407]

You are right. Germany committed war crime and got war crime back. Logic of war. Unfortunately most people reaped that what they never sowed . Never broke the rules but were paid the prize anyway. No matter if in cellars of Coventry or bunkers of Dresden. Mostly the unguilty, that were the people you called "they".

[@bolivar2153]

@@michaelengel3407 More than half of German's were voting to dismantle democracy. They were voting for authoritarianism. They got it. Where was the massed voice of opposition when the rights and civil liberties of the citizenry were slowly nibbled away piece by piece? Their freedom wasn't stolen, it was given away. Their silence cost the lives of 60,000,000.

[@borna4625]

@@bolivar2153 How is 37% in federal election in 1932, more than half? I think you maybe have wrong informations.

[@tarot-sama3119]

The allies were the first one to bomb civilian targets to " affect the morale "

[@PlaneBoy2520]

@@tarot-sama3119 did you just completely forget about the Germans bombing Warsaw?

[@kingcobra8840]

Well, Dresden was a legitimate military target, whether you consider the bombing itself to be a war crime is another story.

[@derekantill3721]

If targeting civilians in Dresden was a war crime, so was the indiscriminate bombing of civilians in London by German V1 and V2 rockets also a war crime.

[@michaelengel3407]

Yes, it was. Therefore we haven't erected any monuments for our bomber crews. "The butcher" is celebrated for killing masses of people. For Indiscriminate bombing. That's quite strange and a big misunderstanding in english history.

[@bolivar2153]

@@michaelengel3407 "the butcher" was a nickname given to him by his own crews, based upon the severe losses they were incurring in raids over occupied territories. It was not given in reference to any moral judgements of the day.

[@Ayahuasca98]

Both are war crimes

[@BlueDragon1504]

They were. Whataboutism doesn't change what is and isn't a warcrime.

[@sarban1653]

When has anyone said the bombing of civilians in London wasn't a war crime? Or is that your personal view?

[@chippewaguy4193]

It was the biggest war the world has ever seen and probably ever will, rules went out the window.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

Rules maybe, but not logic... British leaders were fools, and ignored the big picture... And of all the "big pictures", this is the biggest of all... The worst choice of all was ignoring the reality of how Europe had been "set up" to protect the British Empire. The British Empire was actually protected in Europe by uniquely "balancing powers" on the continent. For more than 100 years, "balancing powers" on the continent, kept these powers opposing each other, unable to divert military or economic resources to affront the status of the British Empire as the nr.1 in the world... According to the logic of this policy, completely ruining a power on the continent, would lead to an imbalance, which could then be directed at the British Empire... Therefore, totally destroying Germany was neither wise nor in GB 's interests. Concerning WW2. Firstly, a 100% collapse of Germany as a power...was a dream condition for communism (Moscow) and US corporatism (Washington D.C.). After WW2, there was no strong Central Europe to "balance out" the rise of communism (Moscow). France broken, pissed off by Mers el Kebir and slipped under Washington's wings... Germany = alles kaputt Eastern Europe = overrun by the commies... GB was no longer the boss. Nothing left to "balance" with... Sorreee. That's just how it goes if your eternal "balancing" games on the continent go south... [Search for: britannica(dot)com/topic/balance-of-power] Washington got tired of bailing GB out, and decided to become the "balancer of powers" in Europe herself. And down went the British Empire too... Sad. "Justifiable" is a bs premise for any debate concerning war. What really counts is smart leadership, and Brits sucked at geopolitics/geostratey, and lost their Empire....

[@chippewaguy4193]

@@ralphbernhard1757 hindsight is 20/20

[@ralphbernhard1757]

@@chippewaguy4193 Not even the "hindsight" excuse is valid. In reality it was a lack of foresight, and sheer stupidity. Because interestingly at the same time as German industrialisation after their 1871 unification, there was another "power" concurrently rising on the other side of the Atlantic. Concerning "the biggest picture of all", aka "geopolitics", they too, were in the advantageous position of a having geographical advantage. Only this time, the rise of technology (steam trains, railways, steam ships, turbines, etc.) at the end of the 19th/beginning of the 20th Century, meant that the geographical advantages the *American Century* enjoyed, would eventually surpass the geographical advantage of the rather narrow English Channel. Similarly to London concerning the continent... [Search for: Splendid_isolation] ...Washington DC could similarly innocently claim to be "just isolating" themselves, while at the same time gaining from the mistakes of other less "isolatable" European powers... The world was M-A-I-N after all, so why not? :-) After WW1 and especially WW2, Washington DC was now in the same situation as GB was pre-WW1. The Atlantic as a "barrier" between the *Americas and Europe,* had supplanted (in importance) the English Channel as the barrier between *GB and the continent.* They had the political "leverage" to impose a favorable geopolitical situation for themselves. After 100 years of playing "balancing games" with the continent, the British Empire became a victim of their own *"game".* That isn't "hindsight". More like sheer ignorance, stupidity, arrogance of power, misuse of a geographical advantage, short-sightedness... And if you give me a few more minutes, I can come up with a few more terms...

[@glennfarr2000]

You know we Americans have been at war ever since?

[@2Dylandog]

@@ralphbernhard1757 The writing was already on the wall. It had been for Empire since the end of WWI. I don't understand how you can ignore the independence movements in India, and later in Africa and the far East. Playing at power balencing in Europe wasn't ever going to prevent the inevitable.

[@trinaholman4083]

War is a crime.

[@johnsmith-hw5bv]

no

[@yorkshire6458]

Why do you make such Videos when you forget the bombing of all countries at this time like Coventry fire bombing etc

[@sovietpie]

Germany wanted total war they got total war

[@ralphbernhard1757]

So Winston *"expire the Empire"* Churchill... ...teamed up with.... Bomber *"burnt the Pound Stirling in a whirlwind"* Harris... What could possibly go wrong? Oh yeah, you lose your "empire". One nation's leaders chose to answer with *"more than the measure",* and as a result bombed themselves into financial and economic ruin... *Too bad they didn't read their Bibles, where it says "an eye for an eye"...* Quote: "The findings are that the strategic air offensive cost Britain £2.78 billion, equating to an average cost of £2,911.00 for every operational sortie flown by Bomber Command or £5,914.00 for every Germany civilian killed by aerial bombing. The conclusion reached is the damage inflicted upon Germany by the strategic air offensive imposed a very heavy financial burden on Britain that she could not afford and this burden was a major contributor to Britain's post-war impoverishment." [Google "GB 1939-45: the financial costs of strategic bombing"] *Note: an average house in London cost around 3,000 Pounds in 1944]* Imagine that. A house in London, for every "Oma Schickelgruber" killed in Germany. *Lose your Empire, and then some...* Aw well. Too bad. Should've read their Bibles... *"An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth".* It doesn't say "more than the measure".

[@kekistanimememan170]

@@ralphbernhard1757 peek skitzo posting

[@ralphbernhard1757]

@@kekistanimememan170 Sorry Mr Mememan, but after WW2 the British Empire imploded rather rapidly, with *"a little help from a friend".* Because during WW2, British leaders had bombed the British Empire into ruin. Apparently "flattening Germany" was a too expensive burden for a failing empire to shoulder... "At the end of the war, Britain, physically devastated and financially bankrupt, lacked factories to produce goods for rebuilding, the materials to rebuild the factories or purchase the machines to fill them, or with the money to pay for any of it. Britain’s situation was so dire, the government sent the economist John Maynard Keynes with a delegation to the US to beg for financial assistance, claiming that Britain was facing a *"financial Dunkirk”.* The Americans were willing to do so, on one condition: They would supply Britain with the financing, goods and materials to rebuild itself, but dictated that Britain must first eliminate those Sterling Balances by repudiating all its debts to its colonies. The alternative was to receive neither assistance nor credit from the US. *Britain, impoverished and in debt, with no natural resources and no credit or ability to pay, had little choice but to capitulate.* And of course with all receivables cancelled and since the US could produce today, those colonial nations had no further reason for refusing manufactured goods from the US. The strategy was successful. *By the time Britain rebuilt itself, the US had more or less captured all of Britain’s former colonial markets, and for some time after the war’s end the US was manufacturing more than 50% of everything produced in the world. And that was the end of the British Empire, and the beginning of the last stage of America’s rise."* [globalresearch(dot)ca/save-queen/5693500] How'd that work out after WW2? Brits being squeezed like a lemon by US banks, having their Pound crushed by the US dominated IMF, being refused the mutually developed nukes to act as a deterrent against the SU's expansion, munching on war rations till way into the 1950s, losing the Suez Canal in a final attempt at "acting tough" and imposing hegemony over a vital sphere of interest...and going under..."third fiddle" in the "Concerto de Cold War"... Maybe they should have informed themselves *how "empires" tick,* because there was another "ring". A "ring which ruled them all". *The American Century.* So they woke up one morning, only to discover that their "best fwiends forever" had stolen all their markets. Such a "special relationship" :-) US historians are far more candid about how "Empire" got screwed over.

[@gary8306]

@@ralphbernhard1757 flattening Germany twice mate was well worth it.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

@@gary8306 Losing your Empire a little bit, then totally after WW2, then flat broke, and then getting screwed over by "best fwiends" was very entertaining. I'm still ROTFLMFAO...

[@TheSmithDorian]

Dresden bombed by the Allies - 3 nights - Bombs and Incendiaries dropped - 4,000T London bombed by Germany - 71 nights - Bombs and Incendiaries dropped - 18,200T (+ anti-personnel parachute bombs with delayed fuses) Where was the war crime exactly ???

[@papageitaucher618]

One should assume number of casualties is a more relevant figure than the weight of Bombs dropped.

[@NissEhkiin]

You seem to not understand that there can be more than one war crime in a war. Or is it only the worst one that is a war crime and the rest are forgiven?

[@richardwills-woodward]

@@NissEhkiin No such thing as a war 'crime' when fighting for your life. It is not a court. It is survival. Looking retrospectively from snivelling millennial armchair critics gets tiresome.

[@NissEhkiin]

@@richardwills-woodward well you sure are dense. By your logic there are no war crimes at all in the history of the human race

[@TheBlackfall234]

London 25.000 Dead Dresden 250.000 Dead. Where is your sanity exactly ?

[@McSlobo]

Moral of the story: when you throw the rules of war out of the window don't expect others to follow them either. I think Germany was let off relatively easy considering the harm done.

[@michaelengel3407]

I agree. And that is the reason why RAF and USAAF committed war crime on Dresden. Allies can't escape from this point of responsibility.

[@Mountainclimber-zv4u1]

Germany got off easy, and the Palestinians got punished severely

[@michaelengel3407]

Germany got off easy? Are you really aware of what you are talking about ?

[@hellboundchaoscommand7567]

Agreed

[@Mountainclimber-zv4u1]

@@michaelengel3407 compared to the people who didn't do the holocaust but were punished for it anyway (the Palestinians), yeah they did

[@xSUBIACOx]

Germans bemoaning war crimes. Precious.

[@fuwa9616]

Yeah, burning innocents is always a war crime. This is why the world is siding with Palestine when they see this happen in modern times.

[@dafeekielelliott2442]

To be fair it was not Germans who intentionally targeted British population centers first, it was the British who targeted German ones. Perhaps not in WW2, but throughout history Britain has been the clear winner in terms of sheer number of war crimes committed.

[@leokobayashiborges9260]

It was a war crime, but it is never seen this way when the winner commit it. The same applies to Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

[@leokobayashiborges9260]

Commits *

[@nichderjeniche]

@@FreeIsraelll the spam troll has a bug.

[@tonyt7372]

What about the London blitz? Coventry? The German war machine felt no pity for the many England cities they bombed. It ony hurt when someone did it to them.

[@michaelengel3407]

Dresden was bombed because of Coventry. Five years later ? Ok. Well, Dresden was bombed to ashes to fullfill the strategy of RAF "area bombing directive" which had been managed since early 1942. Therefore Dresden was not the first city attacked like that and even not the last. No reason to be proud of "the butcher". Ah, you raised a honourful monument for him in London? Well, that might be the famous british humor.

[@bolivar2153]

@@michaelengel3407 "the butcher" was a nickname given to him by his own crews, based upon the severe losses they were incurring in raids over occupied territories. It was not given in reference to any moral judgements of the day.

[@lupusdeum3894]

Warsaw met a similar fate, as did many European cities. Much of Europe was rebuilt from pictures & film footage. The German word for this type of war was Vernichtungskrieg - war of annihilation.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

The idea was to turn the east into farmland. A policy idea later copied by the west as Morgenthau plan. The main reason it wasn't implemented, is because the beginning Cold War meant that Germany had to be rebuilt as an ally.

[@bolivar2153]

@@ralphbernhard1757 The idea (Generalplan Ost) was the extermination of the existing population down to levels that would enable those lands to feed the Reich. These lands would be settled by German's, using any remaining population, deemed sufficiently "acceptable" on their sliding scale of racial "purity", as slave labour. It was indeed Vernichtungskrieg, in every sense of the word.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

Note...the above is sarcasm, if it isn't immediately evident from the wording ;-)

[@ralphbernhard1757]

@@bolivar2153 Note: "the above" comment was also swiped again by the censor...

[@brucenorman8904]

@@ralphbernhard1757 the Morgenthau plan was dropped before the cold war. Hard economic facts came into play. If Germany had been deindustrialized the Western allies would have been forced to provide economic and or food assistance for the indefinite future as Germany could not produce enough food to feed its population without its industrial base would be unable to produce the wealth needed to purchase food for import.

[@pedropinheiroaugusto3220]

Allieds had the right to defend themselves, hey Germany?

[@Da_Fonz]

Dresden can rebuild itself in ONE generation, but Africa, Haiti and many parts of Latin America can't rebuild itself in MULTIPLE generations!

[@patriciabrenner9216]

Maybe ask why.

[@mrnobodytheuser2950]

@@patriciabrenner9216 We know why, its because they are simply not capable.

[@masyaf897]

@@mrnobodytheuser2950 No because they need money and resources which they don’t have. You don’t rebuild a nation from thin air

[@abelmartinezmujica3915]

Well, south america is on its way there; but France was still charging Haiti for its independence until recently, and in the case of Africa, an african ruler that puts its people before the country's mafias is a dead ruler.

[@muratyildiz506]

How can somebody that this is not a war Crime ???? This is a big war crime

[@katys.7767]

only the winners of a war arent targeted for war crimes.

[@Trhrha]

maybe because the Germans did the same but worse

[@tiernanwearen8096]

Germans got what they deserved!

[@MSM4U2POM]

That's exactly the point, my friend: in 1945 there was no Treaty, Convention or any other legal instrument that stipulated what was and what was not acceptable in air warfare. The laws of war on land and sea were well established, but large-scale aerial assault was a relatively new phenomenon. Attempts were made to reach international agreements during the interwar years, but by the time the second world war started, nothing was ratified. This meant that the entire subject was only covered by a few paragraphs of vague and ambiguous language, most of it from the Geneva Convention of 1907, and which pre-dated air warfare by almost a decade. So what little law did exist was wide open to interpretation, and both sides exploited this to the full. You are making the classic mistake of judging historical events by modern standards. Area bombing was not outlawed until 1977, by Protocol One of the Special Ammendment to the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949. Of course it was a war crime in today's legal framework, but that framework simply did not exist in 1945. The shocking fact is that German and Japanese cities - and the people who lived in them - were perfectly legal and legitimate targets under existing international law, because these locations contained production facilities of use to the enemy war effort, and also because the bombers had to fly through defended enemy airspace in order to reach them. The legal situation really was as simple and as straightforward as that, and the contention that Dresden was a war crime only holds water from a moral standpoint, because in law it most definitely was not.

[@TabascoKid]

Because Germany wasn’t doing anything at the time to deserve it? Yall forget the Holocaust?

[@fastair8546]

civilian bombing in ww2 was so terrible. Imagine thinking oh its just another bomb raid, little did they know that they were coming to turn the entire city to dust.

[@stidy8315]

War is horrific, such a waste of beautiful lives to appease the will of weak insecure men.

[@ColoradoBirds]

I mean if an army was firebombing your capital city and taking over Europe, how would you react? Completely impossible to compare your life to what people were experiencing then.

[@CAL1MBO]

Male feminist?

[@arturpojo]

Not a war crime because of the time(only75 years ago) ? i cannot believe that those people are serious...

[@patriciabrenner9216]

Not a war crime at all. Sweet retribution.

[@LittleHomieLightningtech]

​@@patriciabrenner9216objectvely, it is still a war crime today

[@patriciabrenner9216]

@@LittleHomieLightningtech Who cares? After all people are upset at Israel defending itself today.

[@callumkent7155]

People should watch a documentary called hellstorm. Shows the true horrors of what really happened in Dresden

[@pt020]

Germany killed so many civilians that it sound ridiculous him complaining about war crimes.

[@cyclingtrailsuk9978]

@@as-wv8ktwhat about bristol cardiff portsmouth plymouth southampton sunderland hull swansea belfast glasgow birmingham coventry manchester sheffield liverpool and so on who were targetted by the germans

[@KCrucis]

the bombardment of civilian zones was started by the british, search it up.

[@philmay7834]

No different than Germany did to a lot of cities. War is war. Unfortunately.

[@peterson7082]

@War Child?

[@israelc.8586]

@War Child Seriously? So Germany invading Poland and occupying other territories is justified? War was inevitable with Germany invading other territories!

[@xx-wp3mq]

​@War Child They broke many promises and their leaders spoke of world domination. You sit here defending a tyrannical dictator, who wanted a "racially pure" nation.

[@literallyatank3918]

@War Child BOMBER HARRIS DO IT AGAIN

[@shadowbuffed6367]

@War Child you've shitted your pants right now huh?

[@gsxrinfrance5827]

Legitimate target...over 400 small factories in Dresden making optics, gun sights, periscopes, wireless radio communication equipment, radar, binoculars, cameras , electrial components, instruments for aircraft and vehicles, all for military use. All housed within the city itself. It was also a main rail hub for troops headiing East, and later retreating west to defend Berlin..so indeed, a legitimate target.. There are many good books written on Dresdens period during the war years, many noting the destruction of Coventry, and targets like York and Bath.

[@user975bg]

Very sad! WW2 is a horrible example what happens when human hatred and human prejudice are unleashed.

[@BlaiseTighe]

Just imagine what WW3 would look like.

[@americanozoomer9738]

And the bad guys won again

[@JogenMogen]

@@americanozoomer9738 the bad guys won twice indeed, next time won’t be so fun

[@americanozoomer9738]

@@JogenMogen damn straight

[@bellabacci8056]

Still happening today

[@derhades7340]

Arthur "RAF LIT-AF" Harris approves of the destruction of Dresden.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

If God wanted Harris' Bwitish Impure to survive, why did He make them so bankruptable?

[@alexlevinson8629]

Arthur Harris definitely fooked. That man destroyed a whole city. Imagine what he could do to a cervix

[@Hi-vo9ku]

@Omar Little I wish to see the logic behind your vulgar statements.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

@therightstuffbiz Why should citizens waste their tax Euros on nuclear deterence if British and US taxpayers pay up big time for Germany?

[@stephenjenkins7971]

@@ralphbernhard1757 Germany doesn't have to; that's the point. Which is the only reason they have yet to kick the US out of their territory. Personal unwillingness to militarize.

[@HolisticHealthEducation]

War crimes.

[@STI6061]

They had my attention until they started talking about the "Far right"...lame

[@blazejabc7330]

after torturing and killing millions of innocent people, they talk about war crimes?...

[@ralphbernhard1757]

Who is "talking about war crimes"? The title? Look closely. It is a question.

[@blazejabc7330]

@@ralphbernhard1757 1:58 Did u even watch this video, or just commenting ?

[@ralphbernhard1757]

@@blazejabc7330 Yes I did. He said "in my opinion", meaning he is speaking for himself.

[@blazejabc7330]

@@ralphbernhard1757 so what ?

[@ralphbernhard1757]

@@blazejabc7330 Expression of opinion? That's "freedom of speech". What's wrong with that?

[@garyacker7388]

War is a crime! The winner writes the history.

[@e9cw196]

This is obviously a horrible thing but honestly considering what happened to other cities in europe as well I am not surprised.

[@michaelengel3407]

I agree. All air raids on civilians were pure war crime.

[@rwrae72]

Oh that's rich! Germany accusing others of war crimes. Oh man, now i''ve seen everything. What's next: Japan asking for reparations and an apology from Nanjing? lol

[@qksf1645]

War crime and definitely more than 25k died

[@mrthomasfritz]

War crime

[@garethhanby]

@@FreeIsraelll ...and all the world becomes blind.

[@erikso1233]

Pablo Maz you know who died? Women and children. families. How tf is it an eye for an eye

[@TWOCOWS1]

destroying this jewel of human civilization just few weeks before the end of WWII, has been a crime against humanity and civilization. there was no military reason to do so, but the Brits would like us to believe so. if Dresden has any military importance, it would have been bombed long before, since even the distant Koenigsberg was bombed earlier. But victors alway are "right" and innocent of all and every guilt. yeah, right!!

[@OleLeik]

Dresden was not much of a Western allieds concern and almost made it through the war unbombed before it's luck ran out and it got on top of their target list The decision to bomb Dresden was in response to the Sovjet requests to aid their advance toward Berlin by disrupting German communications and transport hubs within eastern Germany such as Leipzig, Chemnitz and Dresden. Dresden happened to be the primary one used as a staging are for troops and supplies to the Eastern front. The bombing of Dresden was not some random pointless act of savagery, but a part of a military campaign against a military target. The attack on Dresden, horrific though the results were for the population, was an act of war and not an "atrocity against a civil cultural city." RAF and USAF weren't Dresden keepers, the German Government was. The true obscenity in 1945 was that Germany was still prelonging the war. Germany had lost the war, everyone knew it, but they refused to stop let alone surrender. If they wanted to go down fighting so be it. In 1945 it was big boys rules at play.

[@TWOCOWS1]

@@OleLeik Russians had their own heavy bomber plains by the thousands. Dresden was only about 50 miles from the Russian front when it was so criminally destroyed by the British, dragging in the Americans. If Russians needed to destroy a non-militarized, NON-DEFENDED city (it fielded no air defenses to make it clear it posed no threat). Do not try to whitewash them. The Allies were as much of a war criminal as the Germans were in that fracas.

[@OleLeik]

@@TWOCOWS1 The short answer is no. In 1941 the USSR did launch a series of raids, mostly at night, with four engine bombers on targets in Germany & Poland. the raids were small, & effect small as well. From 1942 the USSR kept a small heavy bomber group, but not anywhere as numerous as the UK or US fleets. The USSR didn't have remotely near the resources necessary to maintain a strategic air war against Germany while at the same maintain the eastern front. While the Western allies presumly would not mind to turn a blind eye to the activities of Dresden & Co and let them continue to feed German troops to the meat grinder on the Eastern front instead of having to deal with them on the Western front: Some horsedeal was made between the big 3 bosses and the UK and US bomber force ordered to destroy those hubs

[@TWOCOWS1]

@@OleLeik baby, when Dresden was bombed in Feb 1945, the Russian forces were close enough to use long range artillery against Dresden. Stop covering up for the inhumanity, barbarity and incivility of "Bomber Harris" and his war criminal pile

[@PeterMuskrat6968]

“No military reason” The rail hub and industrial quarter of the city disagree. Also, jewel of human civilization? Really? I’ve seen outhouses with more prestige than this place.

[@radiofun232]

Definitely a war crime for which the UK and US authorities were never sentenced. That still has to be done. E.g. Winston Churchill and Marshall Harris were responsible. 16 february 2020.

[@peterson7082]

Nonsense

[@radiofun232]

@@peterson7082 Please tell me your considerations.

[@kd8249]

Oh what about London oh wait we don’t talk about that:)

[@radiofun232]

@@kd8249 London was not "carpet bombed". And apart from Berlin we have: Dresden, Köln, Aken, Hannover, Düsseldorf, Hamburg, cities in the Ruhr area and much more big German cities. Apart from random attacks on civilian trains, train stations, purely random "aims" (when the bombers got back from Germany) etc etc. Read e.g. the book of Guy Gibson. Or: "Aufstieg aus dem Nichts".

[@TheMrBennito]

A retoric question, easily answered: it was a war crime.

[@thema.sosoudid2229]

And?

[@Trhrha]

another east thing to answer is German bombings in that case were also war crimes

[@reaperz5677]

It's really not. The allied bombings were and still are justified.

[@miltiades8822]

@@reaperz5677 how

[@powerdude6835]

@@reaperz5677 no they are not. Warcrimes are warcrimes even if they come from the supposedly "good" side.

[@richardeaves8529]

Sorry mate, you sowed the seed and reaped the whirlwind.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

Not only Churchill, but an entire network of "old boys" stiff-upper-lipped Empire into ruin... Because there's always a big picture... And of all the "big pictures", this is the biggest of all... The worst choice of all was ignoring the reality of how Europe had been "set up" to protect the British Empire. *The British Empire was actually protected in Europe by uniquely "balancing powers" on the continent.* [britannica & balance-of-power] For more than 100 years, "balancing powers" on the continent, kept these powers opposing each other, *unable to divert military or economic resources* to affront the status of the British Empire as the nr.1 in the world. *Note: nobody in Europe ever applied for this "honor".* It was simply imposed on the continental powers, decided behind closed doors by a few London lords without negotiations or accords with those so "divided"... London made Germany, the strongest continental power, "the enemy", as a default setting. According to the logic of this policy, completely ruining a power on the continent, would lead to an imbalance, which could then be directed at the British Empire... *Therefore, totally destroying Germany was neither wise nor in GB 's interests.* Concerning WW2. Firstly, a 100% collapse of Germany as a power...was a dream condition for communism (Moscow) and US corporatism (Washington D.C.). After WW2, there was no strong Central Europe to "balance out" the rise of communism (Moscow). France broken, still angered by Mers el Kebir and slipped under Washington's wings... Germany = alles kaputt Eastern Europe = overrun by the commies... GB was no longer the boss. *Nothing left to play "balancing games" with...* Sorreee. That's just how it goes if the eternal "balancing" games on the continent go south...you loose your empire to the new kids in town... From the unmistakable *"Nr.1"* in 1900, down to *"merely on par"* with Washington DC after WW1, down to *"third fiddle"* during the Cold War. All in less than a single lifetime... Washington got tired of bailing GB out, and decided to become the "balancer of powers" in Europe herself. The world was divided in "East" and "West". And down went the British Empire too... Sorry 'bout that. Causality is a b*tch...

[@Bernacide]

Keep in mind, we only know what those in power want us to know. Also, who knows...had England and France honored their commitments to Poland and actually helped them in 1939, it's possible no other allied cities would have been bombed.

[@richardeaves8529]

@@Bernacide uh. Make a point please

[@xnite_6549]

@@Bernacide They weren’t ready to take on Germany at that time though lacking military means

[@JonJohns-s2k]

"They sowed the wind" Say no more!!! 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧

[@BoggWeasel]

London, Coventry, Bath, Portsmouth, Dover...... the Baedeker raids (specific civilian targets)... V1-V2..... it goes on......

[@cmcneill60]

Good job allies

[@ralphbernhard1757]

Good job American Century too. They had a gweat team... *And so Brits bombed themselves into financial ruin.* "At the end of the war, Britain, physically devastated and financially bankrupt, lacked factories to produce goods for rebuilding, the materials to rebuild the factories or purchase the machines to fill them, or with the money to pay for any of it. Britain’s situation was so dire, the government sent the economist John Maynard Keynes with a delegation to the US to beg for financial assistance, claiming that Britain was facing a *"financial Dunkirk”.* The Americans were willing to do so, on one condition: They would supply Britain with the financing, goods and materials to rebuild itself, but dictated that Britain must first eliminate those Sterling Balances by repudiating all its debts to its colonies. The alternative was to receive neither assistance nor credit from the US. *Britain, impoverished and in debt, with no natural resources and no credit or ability to pay, had little choice but to capitulate.* And of course with all receivables cancelled and since the US could produce today, those colonial nations had no further reason for refusing manufactured goods from the US. The strategy was successful. *By the time Britain rebuilt itself, the US had more or less captured all of Britain’s former colonial markets, and for some time after the war’s end the US was manufacturing more than 50% of everything produced in the world. And that was the end of the British Empire, and the beginning of the last stage of America’s rise."* [globalresearch(dot)ca/save-queen/5693500] Aww. Too bad. Can't all be winners :-D How'd that work out after WW2? Brits being squeezed like a lemon by US banks, having their Pound crushed by the US dominated IMF, being refused the mutually developed nukes to act as a deterrent against the SU's expansion, munching on war rations till way into the 1950s, losing the Suez Canal in a final attempt at "acting tough" and imposing hegemony over a vital sphere of interest...and going under...lol, "third fiddle" in the "Concerto de Cold War"... Aww. So sad. Too bad. *Lost their impure empire, and then some...* Maybe they should have informed themselves *how "empires" tick,* because there was another "ring". A "ring which ruled them all". *The American Century.* So they woke up one morning, only to discover that their "best fwiends forever" had stolen all their markets.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

@the boss Yup. But look on the bright side. Winston *"expire the Empire"* Churchill... ...teamed up with.... Bomber *"burnt the Pound Stirling in a whirlwind"* Harris... What could possibly go wrong? Oh yeah, you lose your "empire". One nation's leaders chose to answer with *"more than the measure",* and as a result bombed themselves into financial and economic ruin... *Too bad they didn't read their Bibles, where it says "an eye for an eye"...* Quote: "The findings are that the strategic air offensive cost Britain £2.78 billion, equating to an average cost of £2,911.00 for every operational sortie flown by Bomber Command or £5,914.00 for every Germany civilian killed by aerial bombing. The conclusion reached is the damage inflicted upon Germany by the strategic air offensive imposed a very heavy financial burden on Britain that she could not afford and this burden was a major contributor to Britain's post-war impoverishment." [Google "GB 1939-45: the financial costs of strategic bombing"] *Note: an average house in London cost around 3,000 Pounds in 1944]* Imagine that. A house in London, for every "Oma Schickelgruber" killed in Germany. *Lose your Empire, and then some...* Aw well. Too bad. Should've read their Bibles... *"An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth".* It doesn't say "more than the measure". *OPERATION UNTHINKABLE STATUS: BURIED* *GB STATUS: BOMBED INTO TOTAL FINANCIAL BANKRUPTCY* *BRITISH SPHERE OF INFLUENCE STATUS: SUPERSEDED* *PAX BRITANNICA STATUS: CANCELLED"* *EMPIRE STATUS: GAME OVER* Reap as you sow counts for all.

[@patriciabrenner9216]

@the boss Not at all. It was retribution.

[@patriciabrenner9216]

@the boss It was sweet retribution. A pity more weren't incinarated.

[@dingdongchingchong8659]

Good job joe biden. Send in more of those illegal fighting aged immigrants

[@demonorse]

War crime. Also Hamburg.

[@michaelengel3407]

@@FreeIsraelll Bible sayings do not always correspond to the truth. Bombing Dresden was war crime same war crime as bombing Coventry or The Blitz

[@michaelengel3407]

@@FreeIsraelll "Who starts" isn't the point. The point is that attacking Dresden and many other cities was the same war crime as Coventry was. No moral difference. No "Eye for an eye" but hate and destructivness.

[@michaelengel3407]

@@FreeIsraelll Do you mean Auschwitz ?

[@demonorse]

@@FreeIsraelll Concentration camps were first used by the British during the second Boer war. By your "logic" does that make the London blitz, or the use of V-weapons appropriate?

[@demonorse]

@@FreeIsraelll Yet again, I've wasted moments of my life engaging a fool.

[@michaeldillon3659]

Look what London looked like?

[@johnpapa8681]

War is war, no matter whatever people want to call it. We will continue to have wars as long as people embrace hate instead of love.

[@shukesisthespoon1962]

haha because that's possible isn't it?

[@lvsoad22]

What’s your point?

[@LukeLovesRose]

Who embraced hate? All the NSDAP wanted was to get rid of Communism. But of course you probably the lies which lead to these atrocities

[@johnpapa8681]

@@LukeLovesRose a lot of people embrace hate. I don't like communism either, but we weren't fighting communists when we slaughtered the native Americans. We weren't fighting communism when we first bought slaves, and then treated people of color like second class citizens. Even a lot of our tv shows are based on supremacy. Audiences want to watch people lose. I see hate all around.

[@LukeLovesRose]

@@johnpapa8681 I don't consider it hateful for people to embrace their abilities, talents, and pat themselves on the back for how good they are. Even Jesus told us that we should be perfect because God in heaven is perfect as we are perfect. Communism doesn't make people feel better about who they are. All it does is bring people down to a level that will best serve the state

[@rykkiee]

“Ah no! You can’t bomb Dresden! My family is there!” Yeah, and mine was in London. You get what you dish out, Kraut.

[@patriciabrenner9216]

And mine in Warsaw.

[@lukejs3182]

The Civilians did nothing. They didn't order the bombings of London. Both are terrible crimes.

[@rykkiee]

@@lukejs3182 Neither did the civilians in Warsaw, London, or Rotterdam.

[@lukejs3182]

@@rykkiee yeah that's what I said. Both are terrible. Have some compassion please.

[@patriciabrenner9216]

@@lukejs3182 compassion for this band of murderers? You are joking aren't you!

[@mclovin5976]

It was unnecessary but Germany bombed uk cities for 59 nights killing 40k people. The deaths wer horrific for those caught in firestorm and especially in the air raid shelter.

[@gregcameron6047]

6 million in cocentration camps, Warsaw plus other minor events,

[@thomaspridmore106]

They got what they asked for but it was terrible

[@nuckingfuts3204]

@@gregcameron6047 Prove it. To date there is still no proof of extermination. As for the concentration labour camps, didn't British have concentration camps with Axis prisoners? Didn't Americans? Didn't Soviets. Your arguments are based on ignorance, because you've never actually studied history and merely digest what they tell you to, like good cattle.

[@patriciabrenner9216]

@@thomaspridmore106 no it was sweet retribution.

[@SteveZussou]

Actually, get your fact straight. England bombed germany multiple times well before germany retaliated. Englands indiscriminate night raids killed close to a million civillions, thats why germany retaliated on UK cities. Two sides to every story, don't be blinded by patriotism.

[@paulmasterson386]

It could have been worse. We started building the atomic bomb because we knew that Germany was trying to build one. That’s why Paul Tibbetts was chosen to drop it as he had been flying over Europe. The first target for an atomic attack would have been Berlin,but of course Germany had surrendered before the bomb was ready,and Japan became the target.

[@iTheusxz]

"War crime"? War alone is already a crime

[@michaelengel3407]

Yes, a never ending sequence of war crime, retaliation, revenge, retaliation, revenge, etc...

[@AsymmetricalCrimes]

war is not a crime.

[@Attmay]

@@AsymmetricalCrimes no, it is not. Not retaliating against war crimes is a crime.

[@Greggee100]

and twenty years to-the-day Operation Rolling Thunder commences in Southeast Asia...Go Figure, history does have its way

[@fckeu88]

Linebacker as well

[@jeromemajewski4813]

If he considers the bombing of Dresden a war crime, what does he consider the destruction of Warsaw by his fellow Germans? The Germans started it all and they were paid back in kind.

[@dafeekielelliott2442]

The Germans did not "start it all," in fact Britain was the first to violate the informal agreement between them and Germany to not target civilians in bombing raids.

[@KK-rg1wz]

@@dafeekielelliott2442 Wrong, the germans started, the bomb ing of Wielun in Poland took place on September 3th, 1939.....

[@dafeekielelliott2442]

@@KK-rg1wz While it doesn’t justify it, the bombing of Wielun was based on incorrect intelligence that a Polish battalion was stationed there. Regardless the agreement was in regard to German and British cities and the British did not react to the bombing of Poland.

[@Viking1080]

@@dafeekielelliott2442 I belive it was the Luftwaffe. Whether that was a delibrate act or caused by someone messing up is unclear to this day. In the end it did not matter, once the deed was done it was gloves off

[@Mitch_Richard44]

@@Viking1080 Agreed. All anyone needs to know is that the Germans pioneered bom bing civilians in WWI with Zeppelins and Gothas, then in Spain at Guernica. They started WW2 with destroying Warsaw, then terror bom bed Rotterdam. There's no sign of the Germans having any sort of issue against bom bing civilians.

[@afolabiadebajo6489]

And Warsaw, Stalingrad, Kursk, Leningrad, London, Antwerp, etc, and Gaza today, hypocrisy!!! 😗

[@mayapiotrowska9444]

That reminds me: my great parents also lives on the top floor in the center of Warsaw during the war. The city was bombarded in September 1939 and again in 1944. They also hid in the cellar. My grandmother hid the photo albums there. Today we can see what a great lives they had before war. This war was started by Germany. Many civilians died, lives destroyed on both sids. Did we learned anything ?

[@patriciabrenner9216]

Don't forget how the Geermans bombed the escaping civilians from Warsaw from the air in September 1939. And they have the chutzpah to complain?

[@halohalo505]

No we ever?

[@sandranatali1260]

I guess we haven't learned anything from WW2, since we are witnessing what's happening with Russia and Ukraine. More people dying, homes being destroyed, people fleeing and years of people having mental problems. Especially the children! What a shame, our governments have not learned a thing. They are still willing to destroy the lives of their citizens. Political issues are more important than the lives of people.

[@patriciabrenner9216]

We learned a lot.

[@patriciabrenner9216]

@@sandranatali1260 Oh they have learned.

[@speedygonzales1431]

100% mission accomplished.Germany had to taste some of its own medicine.

[@JimCCorn]

Maybe don't start wars that you can't finish.

[@pagedown4195]

That goes for Japan as well

[@michaelengel3407]

Yes, you are right. But war was not finished at the skies over Dresden. War crime does not finish any war. However allied fairy tale of humanity was finished finally.

[@patriciabrenner9216]

@@michaelengel3407 The llies were fine. The Grman civilians were all guilty.

[@Jeremy-y1t]

Harris later said, "I want to point out, that besides Essen, we never actually considered any particular industrial sites as targets. The destruction of industrial sites always was some sort of bonus for us. Our real targets always were the inner cities."

[@ajc389]

You started it, you should not have invaded Poland.

[@nazfrde]

"...He's been collecting photos and videos of Dresden since the 19th century for his film archives." That's a pretty good trick.

[@stevejhkhfda]

It doesn't take long to find out that the German 'strategic' bombing started from the outset in Polish cities and British civilian areas (The Blitz). After such aggression yes the Allied forces did strike back in Dresden which was a garrison city. In this era it is unacceptable and rightly so, and it is horrible now thinking of the German civilians who suffered in this way.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

The "garisons" were not stationed in the sport stadium in the city centre, which was the *target point.*. According to released material, the direction the bomber stream was taking had the *intention* of creating a fire storm in the city centre...again. No soldiers were stationed here. Furthermore, today one doesn't find apologetic Germans, raving about Warsaw and Coventry, as one does of other nationalities in the forums of the internet, 75 years after these events.

[@michaelengel3407]

The Frauenkirche and homes of civilians, burnt to ashes, were garrison buildings ? Dresden as a "garrison city" wasn't in focus of bomber command that terrible night. Attacked were the entire city with all people within. That had been real purpose of "area bombing directive" since early 1942. Dresden wasn't the first victim of that directive and even not the last.

[@joaov.m.oliveira9903]

​@@ralphbernhard1757 WTF?? But Germany were the aggressors to begin with. Its entire gangster Government, if I remember well, were executed for Initiating and waging wars of aggression. It's just normal that a sane individual will prefer not to defend his country plundering another country for no reason.

[@AlexxxxxSaysHi]

​@@michaelengel3407 the city employed 50000 munitions workers. Also, it is common to use a large, visible structure as a point of reference for bombing because, you know, bombers had a spread of several miles in ww2....

[@Aliye4]

4:16 “If it were to happen today it would be definitely certainly be regarded as a war crime” But there it is happened already in gaz@ and no one said it is a war crime !!!! What a hypocrisy is that !

[@megasc0rcher]

To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize

[@Attmay]

Whites, heterosexuals, and Gentiles. They are the ones who shout “free speech“ the loudest while suppressing the speech of everybody else and threatening our livelihoods if we question their hegemony in any way, shape, or form.

[@megasc0rcher]

@@Attmay Im sorry, this must be satire, that was a good one

[@melgibsonafter5beers626]

He cries out in pain as he strikes you.

[@dingdongchingchong8659]

Jjjuuuiiiiccceeeeeee!!!!!!

[@syashadeed7552]

Obvious war crime

[@JonDoeNeace]

Nope.

[@robzonefire]

This is the reason why I despise warfare.

[@Lalasfritas]

Yeah. Soldiers on either side just blindly follow orders and sooner or later they don't even know what they're fighting for anymore.

[@DangerousWordsPodcast]

Don't push socialism on people enjoying freedom.

[@lettuceman9439]

>industrial Complex >military garrison >Propaganda victim blaming >SS is there >the luffwaffe bombing warsaw, minsk and london >Telling the slavs that they will be massacred

[@carllee7384]

Really, the Holocaust and Rape of Nanking don't get you pizzed off? Azshle.

[@idonhaveanyideawhattocallm1472]

Both sides commited atrocities but because the Germans lost only they had to pay

[@Pommern712]

@@christonefeltzs5149 not

[@Pommern712]

@@christonefeltzs5149 America is not a person

[@mackjohnson3918]

@@christonefeltzs5149 Canada.

[@spleensthecat8776]

USA has never won a war

[@someonenoone1636]

Germany : bombs half a hundred European cities, and committing thousands of war crimes Uk: bombs Germany back Germany :surprised pickacho face

[@Bernacide]

@War Child 👍✌

[@michaelengel3407]

I agree but that makes allied war crime on Dresden not undone. However that is how to recognize a war crime: It is justiified by another.

[@OleLeik]

Dresden was a legitimate military target and no warcrime comitted as no laws of war was violated. In all fairness the same goes for London, Coventry and other UK cities that was bombed by the Germans.

[@michaelengel3407]

I don't get the question. Of course it was allied war crime. In other words said, Dresden (and many other german cities) was a legitimate target just as London, Coventry, Rotterdam or Warschau were legitimate targets. There was no moral difference between these criminal air raids. Hate and blind destructiveness flew the planes on both sides. Shame on those who gave the orders in Berlin or London. Vae victis ! Some were convicted of death, some were honored for the crime they had done.

[@b.w.9244]

If there was one soldier in Dresden then it was a legitimate target. They got nothing more or less than what they had coming. Same for Japan.

[@papageitaucher618]

@@b.w.9244 if consider reprisals on the general population as inherently justified then I sincerely hope youre neither British, American (or most other nationalities)

[@BOBGRUBM8]

B. W. Its a war crime since there was very little strategic value in dresden

[@davidroberts7282]

@@BOBGRUBM8 There was very little statetic value in Luftwaffe bombing Coventry or the special Luftwaffe's Condor Legion in Spain lent to Franco's Nationalists who mercilessly bombed an entire Basque city of Guernica and its civilians to a indescribable pulp, even though there was anti-aircraft weapons or communications center in Guernica, the German Luftwaffe Condor Legion didnt even bother attacking these targets, it was a terror bombing against unarmed, defenseless Spanish Basque civilians. Nothing more, nothing less. I've yet to see any UN war crimes committe or international organization charge any European government, its military branches or order it to pay reparations or damages to the victims of Guernica or their descendants. What the German Condor Legion did to Guernica wasn't too different in its aims during the Spanish Civil War then what Allied bombers did to Dresden in January 1945, except one, particular city was much bigger and more inhabited then a relatively small, obscure northern Spain Basque town near the French border that's known or discussed among a certain section of WWII or 20th century historians.

[@michaelengel3407]

@Iwannhs o Rwssos I think you don't know what you are talking about. There wasn't any mercy for Dresden and its people. I regret your hate.

[@aclown36]

Germany destroying the city pf Warsaw: Germany when one of their cities is bombed: "Muh culture!!!"

[@michaelengel3407]

An "argument" right from children's playground. Dresden meant just more bodies and just more devastation. Warsaw hadn' t got any benefit from destruction of another city. I hope you will overcome your hatred some day.

[@patriciabrenner9216]

Germans partaking in the loot, cheering murderers and whining when they get it back. They still think they are ubermenschen

[@LW13r]

The only reason this is being “debated” IF it’s a war crime proves it’s not a war crime if you win

[@QuestionEverythingAssumeNothng]

This I actually agree on because usually if you are the victor then you can get away with near genociding a free people. 1.3 million Germans post war estimate deaths.

[@grahamthebaronhesketh.]

Of course it was a most wicked war crime at the closing weeks of the war. To kill civilians indiscriminately on mass using chemical incendiary weapons...What pathetic excuse can anyone use to justify that?

[@patriciabrenner9216]

Different from Ziklon B that they used to murder millions. This lot paid for German crimes.

[@executiveincentives2]

The Germans started it with the battle of Britain.... I don't see the difference.. One good turn deserves another.

[@albertopiergiorgi5980]

People murdered industrially, numbered like animals, anonymously and in humiliation in Auschwitz or in Belarus by Einsatzkommmandos would give a lot for such a dignified and humane death as in Dresden.

[@gamerdrache6076]

yeah is ure love getting killed for something i didn´t do

[@S71xx]

Germans: *Drop bomds on civies* Allies: "We accept your terms." *Drops bombs on german civies* Sub basement IQ people of today: "That was teh bads, allies teh bads!"

[@ralphbernhard1757]

Spanish: Drop bomds on civies (see Riff War) Legion Condor: "We accept your terms." Drops bombs on Spanish civies Sub basement IQ people of today: "That was teh bads, Germans teh bads!"

[@bolivar2153]

@@ralphbernhard1757 Germans : Drops bombs on civies (see Great War) Just like every "good" idea, it originated in Germany. One can't but help admire their resourcefulness and inventiveness, no?

[@michaelengel3407]

Just a quite simple look on history but it is not that simple to relieve Britain of its responsibility. The "terms" were given by british "area bombing directive". Terms of hate and blind destructiveness. Allied campaign against german civilians started in early 1942 and finished in spring 1945. As a consequence and impressed by massive destruction and terrors on civilians people with an advanced IQ made an international law that considers bombing civilians as war crime in general. Well, for many european cities that law came to late.

[@bolivar2153]

@@michaelengel3407 "people with an advanced IQ made an international law that considers bombing civilians as war crime in general" With caveats. The concept of proportionality exists, even to this day. Were they too late in implementing these laws? Definitely. They should have been implemented following the Great War, when the implications for the future were made abundantly clear to all.

[@michaelengel3407]

@@bolivar2153 I agree.

[@chrise.2666]

As long as the left is callous about human lives the Far right will grow in numbers

[@AllansStation]

As a nine year old boy in 1940 ii sheltered in terror as the German bombers came over London night after night causing death and destuction. As Air Marshall Harris said later " they sowed the wind, now they will reap the whirlwind"

[@mr.gigagod9736]

damn 90 year old

[@ralphbernhard1757]

"The bombing of Plzeň in what was then Czechoslovakia. The official history stated that the Skoda works in Pilsen "received 500 well-placed tons", and that "because of a warning sent out ahead of time the workers were able to escape, except for five persons. "The Americans received a rapturous welcome when they liberated the city. Zinn wrote: I recalled flying on that mission, too, as deputy lead bombardier, and that we did not aim specifically at the 'Skoda works' (which I would have noted, because it was the one target in Czechoslovakia I had read about) but dropped our bombs, without much precision, on the city of Pilsen. Two Czech citizens who lived in Pilsen at the time told me, recently, that several hundred people were killed in that raid (that is, Czechs)-not five." Copied from the Film Archives Channel (KZbin) After World War II, Zinn attended New York University on the GI Bill, graduating with a B.A. in 1951. At Columbia University, he earned an M.A. (1952) and a Ph.D. in history with a minor in political science (1958). "It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." Henry Kissinger

[@informationoverload2487]

yet it wasn’t America who did this bombing. It was a joint action by RAF and the USAF. Stop trying to paint the US as a villain. We were all complaisant in this bombing and the war at large. There are no heroes in war. But there is a right and wrong. The Germans did wrong. This bombing was righting their wrong.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

@@informationoverload2487 Plzen was in Czechoslovakia.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

@@informationoverload2487 I'm literally copying the words of one of the US bomber crews who was there. Do you want to disagree with somebody who was actually there? I suggest talking to him, not me...

[@informationoverload2487]

@@ralphbernhard1757 Good soldiers follow orders. If he disagreed with his orders his inaction is between him and god.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

@@informationoverload2487 Yes. They "just follow orders". God will sort them out... Errr...there *is no "God".*

[@misbahulimam2512]

After learning about Dresden firestorm, I can clearly say that there was no battle of good vs evil. It was battle between evil and less evil in which millions and millions of people suffered.

[@OleLeik]

I think you have watched to much Star Wars and Lord Of The Ring with their epic battles of good vs evil. It's fiction. There have never been nor will ever be good guys among the major powers. Some are more evil and dangerous than others, but there is no saints among them. Anyhow: I don't see what's so special with Dresden, just another destroyed city among so many others as far as I am concerned. Total wars are brutal and nasty at the best of times, Far worse stuff happened all over the place at the time and in the human slaughter bill of WW2 Dresden is a rather minor post.

[@PikeBishop1]

Because it was the "good guys" commiting the act, that's why.

[@akmalhafiz8763]

War crime are committed by both side. Unfortunately in this case, only the losers got convicted while the winner are let loose.

[@Whatt787]

Nice grammar

[@cmcreations3830]

Justified. That was the only way for them to feel the heat, pain and suffering that their soldiers was causing on other countries.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

Ah, the "area bombing"-fanboys...lol. The term "naive old buffer" comes to mind. How could they be so wrong? Didn't they know that for any US President, the US would always come first? Didn't they know or even instinctively feel that most of the US elites were just waiting for the British Empire to crumble? *So let's become "best fwiends" with a faraway "empire", the American Century.* And don't even get me started on that "enemy of my enemy is my friend" claptrap. When in history has that ever worked out? Never has and never will, especially where ideological enemies are concerned. *Because Stalin too, was just waiting for the old European Empires to crumble.* So let's make Stalin a friend too. Two "friends", just waiting for you to crumble and fail. "England has no eternal friends, England has no perpetual enemies, England has only eternal and perpetual interests." (Lord Palmerston) *Why should it be different for anybody else?*

[@ralphbernhard1757]

You want children to suffer "as punishment"? Really?

[@jeanvaljean6234]

I see where you come from but the essentiallist, responsibility-by-identity ideology behind your statement makes no sense

[@ambrozz_plays7992]

@It’s All So Tiresome source?

[@MikeBrin96]

@@pahanwoc That's pretty much a lie people tell themselves to feel better about being complacent.

[@thomasmaloney843]

One side of my family was from Dresden, so I am not wowed by the bombing. Elsewhere, dad was in England in WW2 and saw a lot of destruction and cities wiped out due to German forces. Kurt Vonnegut who was a POW during the Dresden bombing thought about 300,000 people got killed. Kurt was from Indianapolis.

[@anthonyeaton5153]

Nonsense! The death total though still bad was c25,000

[@annoyingbstard9407]

Bearing in mind he was a POW how did he count them all?

[@tectoramia-sz1lu]

The official figure was around 22,000 roughly the same number who died in London.

[@KOPITE8989]

Exactly, when the uk was bombed ie Birmingham liverpool leeds etc over 40,000 died​@tectoramia-sz1lu

[@KOPITE8989]

​@@tectoramia-sz1lu.

[@daddyshrek2295]

morale is a huuuuuuuuuuge resource in a war by bombing a large city like Dresden, the allies reduced German morale by a lot, which helped win the war as sad as it is that civilians died, it was a small price to pay to stop the colossal atrocities that Germany was committing against the entire continent so yeah it was a legitimate target