Earthquake Resistant Design | IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016 | Cl- 7.7.3 & 7.11.1.2 | ilustraca | Sandip Deb

Earthquake Resistant Design | IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016 | Cl- 7.7.3 & 7.11.1.2
📌𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐛𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐧 𝐄𝐓𝐀𝐁𝐒 & 𝐑𝐂𝐃𝐂 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐑𝐂𝐂 𝐁𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐏𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐬 (𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐂-𝟎𝟒)
Visit the course here- amitco.courses.store/407721?u...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @ilustraca

[@ravishankar.p5542]

You are always my best guide thank you sir .

[@ChinTanLimbani]

Till day What we are applying till day we can understood here only.... Nice One.👍👍👍

[@shareqinamdar8903]

Very Informative

[@farazfh346]

Please make explanation video on IS 16700 2023 vs IS 16700 2017

[@UnmeshBane]

What is the initial scale factor to be used for response spectrum case in Etabs, Please can you comment on this with some reference

[@arifsardar3650]

For Buildings, lower than 15m in Seismic zone II and Approximate natural period less than 0.4 sec, we only use equivalent static method. In that case lateral displacement check should be done for equivalent static method? If we do then we might have higher displacement as the model still does not have the infill part but we are considering the shear which is taking care of infill part in the Ta equation.

[@ilustraca]

Do you think buildings having height less than 15m will be displacement governing even if we check with higher static force? The time period less than o.4 sec itself describes that building is more stiff, not flexible hence there is no requirement of checking displacement in such cases.

[@erzahidahmad8314]

Sir if I am taking in static method the Sa/g Value as max=2.5 can the dynamic force ( base shear) be greater than Static base shear

[@ilustraca]

First learn how Dynamic analysis is being performed.