ECHR Lecture

[@kaiiofficially]

Figured I should get a head start before the next semester... so I came straight to Marcus Cleaver. One word mate: LEGEND

[@marcuscleaver]

Cheers pal!

[@kelechiokorie2863]

Absolutely awesome. I'm not sure whether I am more impressed by your smooth delivery or your obvious immense knowledge for one so young (at least you look very young). Great lecture.

[@marcuscleaver]

Haha thank you. Always lovely to receive such kind and positive comments! :)

[@laurenrickwood4446]

I have found this incredibly helpful for completing my assignment around absolute, limited and qualified rights! Just what i needed, so happy to have found this on youtube :)

[@marcuscleaver]

Hooray! Glad it was of some use :D

[@janak.6796]

Thanks for putting it out. I had Human Rights lectures more than 10 years ago and this nicely refresh the basic knowledge ☺️👍

[@nicnaxnax51]

this was really good and clear the question is how do retain all of it??

[@monerahayder3201]

thank goodness I found your channel. it is so useful 😀 thank you

[@faederaewisch]

Just watching your video to cram lite* for an exam, and it's a huge help! Thanks very much for consolidating everything this way.

[@nicnaxnax51]

Areas I wish you would discuss - in Criminal - Defenses and Contract - Mistake. Honestly i would like you to do lectures on all the elements of contract: misrepresentation, frustration Duress and undue influence - but this might be asking for too much. BTW thank you so much

[@marcuscleaver]

+nicnax nax Thanks for your kind comments. I will definitely look into it and get back to you!

[@stephany9786]

Thanks for the summary, well done! I'd like to add one thing: You mentioned that the european court ruled, that laws of same sex marriage could not be imposed in a specific case involving austria because it's mainly catholic. I did a bit of research and I am glad to announce, that banning same sex marriage was ruled as unconstitutional, which means it will be legalized by the 1st of 2019 (:

[@marcuscleaver]

Yay, I will be so glad when this video is out of date!! :)

[@stephany9786]

Me too! It's really about time though. I was shocked to hear that it's not yet legal here ... and a bit embarrassed that i didn't know that before. I just assumed that it was. Lesson learned: Never take human rights for granted. So thanks again for the nice data (:

[@lesliea.6440]

Lovely! Thank you for posting..would you happen to have anything on minority protection via the Copenhagen Criteria w/ EU Enlargement?

[@manolisko8881]

Very helpful summary! Perhaps you should include more key court cases!

[@jokerkhan4129]

Thanks for such a great lecture. it help me alot thanks again

[@seherrajput305]

Supremely helpful:) thank you .

[@darceydiaries42]

May i say, you my friend, are AMAZING! I am a first year LLB student with my exams fast approaching and this lecture was brilliant! Do you do any individual support?

[@sabakhelashvili6360]

I dont know enough English but I would try to ask you what I want to know: If I am arrested and sentenced to imprisonment illegally, Is ECHR able to obligate my country to release me from the prison instantly or it is only able to obligate the country to pay me some money as a compensation? thank

[@rugbywindow]

Thanks for the video lecture. Do you have similar video lectures on the African and American equivalent Covenants? the ACPHR and the COAS etc.? If not, do you know where I could find online video content that explains them? Many thanks.

[@camillaviktoria2038]

Hello, On the ECHR website there is an opportunity to see at what stage of communication the complaint is. app.echr.coe.int/SOP/index.aspx?lg=en Please tell me what `` Date of Introduction`` means? Is this the date the complaint was filed or the date the complaint was received by mail by the ECHR staff? For example: by mail, the dispatch date is 01.06.2020, and delivered to the ECHR on 05.06.2020. Which of these two dates will stand in place of the ``Date of Introduction``? Thank you in advance for your response. Oksana

[@marcuscleaver]

It is the date on which a completed application is sent to the court.

[@reehanacharya6229]

Your videos are great

[@fasm9326]

found it very interesting regarding the hijabi ban was other religious garments in similar correlations like the Nuns placed under this ban too or was it exclusively for Muslims? thanks

[@advbhumika1768]

Nice one .regards from an indian

[@abduboss9667]

Movie no. surprised me the most, and it did so… Movie no. touched me most overall, and it did so because ... Movie no. made me most angry/sad, and it did so because ... Movie no. made me most happy/positive, and it did so .......

[@abduboss9667]

can you pls answer this questions

[@nobody___knows]

So helpful, thanks!

[@nicnaxnax51]

also do you lectures on Criminal, contract, etc??

[@marcuscleaver]

Have one on EU law coming up but can do one on contract/criminal in the future. Any specific area you are struggling with?

[@me5946]

nice video

[@radovantocka5787]

i would like to say something about the so-called ECHR.therefore, that court is in the service of legally damaged EU citizens, 1. so let’s say that when you send an e-mail to the ECHR to explain what the problem is, that court will not consider it, because the ECHR does not provide legal advice.2 if you go to strasbourg look for a lawyer to explain why you came and what to do and it's pretty complicated because in Strasbourg you have to make an appointment, and the question is whether that lawyer wants to speak English (I tried this myself). and let me just tell you the experiences of lawyers in my country with the ECHR (researched by two journalists).In 2018, out of 139 lawsuits filed with the ECHR, only 3 were considered by the court. Prominent Croatian lawyers, with experience at the European Court of Human Rights, jointly stated in the Croatian Journalists 'House that the court in Strasbourg is just a place for destroying documents', numerous Croatian media noted at the time. As many as 97 to 98 percent of lawsuits that come to the court for human rights from Croatia are rejected at the outset, ie they are declared inadmissible. Thus, lawyers in Croatia are generally accustomed to receiving rejections from Strasbourg, but in addition they are already accustomed to not receiving explanations of the decision on inadmissibility, which is contrary to the Convention on Human Rights, in addition to brief information.and just to consider how much the lawsuits filed with the ECHR cost, so for ECHR I can only give a thumbs down

[@YS-in1jk]

Succinct and digestible thanks!

[@nehagurung7555]

very helpful Thank you :)

[@marcuscleaver]

You're welcome :)

[@bubblenut6926]

Can a British lady living in Malta be entitled to the PROTOCOL 'Peaceful enjoyment of her property in Gozo Malta ?

[@francispowell1811]

A bit late, but the meme at Art.14 is really funny!

[@rue.olearywalker]

How’s this changing after Brexit? I don’t suppose you’d be making another video about this at all 🙂 Also, does “interest of national security” include some guy in admin who thinks it’s funny 😒

[@marcuscleaver]

Altogether now for the 504th time: 👏 HUMAN 👏RIGHTS👏LAW👏IS👏NOT👏EU👏LAW 👏.

[@rue.olearywalker]

@@marcuscleaver Ok man. I was referring to human rights law in Europe though just as curiosity. The answer is this. I should of googled, I guess I was trying to create a conversation. www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/our-human-rights-work/what-does-brexit-mean-equality-and-human-rights-uk

[@Temo990]

@@marcuscleaver But leaving the EU means it is easier to leave the Human Rights Convention if Britain desire to do so, isn't it? Aren't EU members required to be part of the Human Right Convention or at least have to fullfill all conditions of the treaty?

[@nayabzafar123]

Do u have a video on complete uno structure ?

[@apolloguesthouse2737]

We live in the Medieval Town of Rhodes. This has World Heritage Status and I am about to write to them with regard to regulations regarding the standards required( if any) to have this status maintained. But my questions pertain to another problem. Permission has been granted for a person to open an all night, open air club attracting over 500 youngsters each night. Music starts at 12.00am and continues throughout the night severely affecting the community of inhabitants in the Old Town. A group to protest this has been formed and I feel our rights as citizens are being violated, I notice every person has the right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence, or the right to peaceful enjoyment of property. The Police are ineffectual and the Mayor has done nothing to alleviate the situation. It seems there is nothing we can do to end this. The old town is a living place not just a monument and there are families with young children living close by. People cannot sleep and are becoming stressed and very frustrated with it all. Comments and advice very welcome. Could I write to the European Court? This is noise pollution and I wonder if there are any European statutory restrictions on this too. It seems nothing can be done here. Don't I have the right to a good night's sleep?

[@marcuscleaver]

+APOLLO GUESTHOUSE Your best course of action is to bring a case in your local court against the Regulations and to raise human rights arguments as part of that (enjoyment of property etc.). Explore whether there are local or national rules about acceptable sound levels and remember to gather evidence and keep records about all of your actions.

[@apolloguesthouse2737]

Thank you very much for your reply. We have a meeting with the Mayor next Wednesday. Fines are imposed by the authorities but the bars and clubs just pay them and then start over again. People are angry that inspite of protests nothing ever seems to change and there is a feeling of powerlessness. However your comments point us in some direction as we were considering appointing a lawyer. I can certainly try to find out about legislation if any on acceptable noise levels. I appreciate your time and consideration of this matter. M Holland

[@Zoltan-ri6tj]

Vriau să fiu ajutat la cede am fapte pe nedrept hn italia

[@janak.6796]

Sorry - refreshed

[@NothingYouHaventReadBefore]

I'm glad we agree on the architectural merits of the ECHR. It's a very ugly building.

[@LindaPow]

PS here's to you

[@nipabegum1241]

Cute boy.thank you.so much

[@darrenbrown692]

I cont get into fucking Court ! Let alone have fair one. This court is out off it's fucking mind. Up there on a pedestal thinking there above all and sundry.

[@yaquineben415]

Hello, i am writing just to tell you, you made a mistake for France, the niqab and hijab are allowed however the burqa is banned

[@PipinhoSnow]

:)

[@nipabegum1241]

Cute