Public Law Lecture - Police Powers 1

[@MrClappy99]

I believe I was unlawfully searched yesterday. Cheers for the video mate, it's definitely an eye opener.

[@lauram7323]

Can you please do a series on Evidence Law? It's so complicated and you explain subjects so thoroughly!! Thank you

[@ASKLLB-l9o]

Note how the sufficient and insufficient grounds under grounds to stop and search overlap and/or are ambiguous

[@JPB-zu6wd]

for the lay man/person this is very clear excellent video, thank you young man.

[@Utubefohevah]

11:00 If you steal a sandwich, eat it immediately. If you have some cannabis at home, don't go home after stealing the sandwich.

[@marcuscleaver]

Smoke the cannabis at home then, when you get the munchies, go out and steal a sandwich.

[@fantabidoze]

marcuscleaver - love this !! Haha 😄

[@mightymouse1534]

Hi Marcus, I trust you are well and enjoying the semi-nice weather! Thank you for the video, really is thorough! I didn't know where to start but this is going to help!

[@fantabidoze]

Wow. This man is a true genius !

[@rachieee0006]

I wonder if you can answer if what the police did to me was legal or not? they came for a domestic stuck their foot in the door pulled a taser and dragged me by my arm out the door because I wouldn't let them in and tried to shut door. They then got me over a balcony rail which was loose by the way and hurt my arm by restraining it behind my back. I told them they were hurting me and they eventually let go but wouldnt allow me access to my property. They then went in my property and eventually left no arrests or anything. I got hurt and did nothing wrong except refuse entry is this right?

[@sophienichols2397]

Brilliant videos, I've got my first year LLB exams coming up, had to defer due to illness and ended up missing a fair bit of uni. However all of your videos are really helping me fill in the gaps! Thanks so much!!!!

[@marcuscleaver]

Oh no! I'm sure you'll soon ace those exams and catch up! ;)

[@ProDemocracy01]

Good video

[@TheresaRocheactress]

Marcus the ultimate.mega-mentor strikes again.

[@charambit3818]

Great video thank you. I am studying law at college (as my school 6th form did not do law). I am thinking of going to Oxford to study law. Great vid. Liked and subscribed.

[@jordanwoosnam6399]

thanks for the help im going to take an MCQ exam on Saturday and this was really helpfull

[@marcuscleaver]

+Jordan Woosnam sweet, good luck!

[@emmanueleko1401]

Where is the best place to find a solicitor claimants letter please?

[@josephharrington9432]

What if it’s your house and you tell the police the person they are looking for is not there. Can they still demand to enter your home.

[@aloop5428]

can say something about firewok act 2003

[@jonniejam-shovel6405]

Marcus Leaver. Thank you for sharing this information with us. I do have a question for you though. My question is: In your opinion are WE policed by consent? Many thanks.👍

[@marcuscleaver]

True consent requires a contract that is freely agreed by both parties but we don't ever get this option. The idea of a social contract should be viewed with scepticism.

[@jonniejam-shovel6405]

We already have the lawful consent we require and its called Magna Carta. Although i'm sorry to say our people have taken their eyes off the ball, and like many policemen/women you'll meet on their beat these people are just as ignorant, and do not know the law. Many Corporations now believe that 'Legal' is 'Lawful' and that is simply not the case. We stand under statutes although we are not obliged to. The worrying example of this is council tax, and the fraud with regard to liability orders. Administrative courts are unlawful in this country. They are company meetings nothing else. It is no more the rule of law than PACE is. We are not obliged to stand under this, as we are not obliged to give our names to a police-officer. We have the right to silence, and we hold the power. kzbin.info/www/bejne/g6LKdXeFaqdri8U kzbin.info/www/bejne/g6LKdXeFaqdri8U

[@jonniejam-shovel6405]

More evidence from Mr Badaloo. Very worrying. kzbin.info/www/bejne/kKGcc6OraNSFfqs kzbin.info/www/bejne/kKGcc6OraNSFfqs

[@scottsound4711]

@@marcuscleaver Consent by silence... Do a notice of understanding and claim of right..

[@scottsound4711]

@@marcuscleaver its VOID but ppl's have fotgotten there rights .

[@rabian5928]

thank you so much for taking the time to help others with your knowledge! I have severe anxiety about my upcoming Public Law exam and you have helped me so much.

[@marcuscleaver]

You'll be fine! Good luck! :)

[@pilothobson]

What is the law on public photography?.

[@alanjones-6639]

The right to remain silent, does that include at the booking in desk process!

[@jgfox1983]

One thing I have never been able to get my head round is that “Reasonable Suspicion” is really quite subjective on the part of the police. This can surely be made up by the officer based on what side of bed he or she woke up on. Could you elaborate as to how it cannot be used as an excuse?

[@marcuscleaver]

The main thing is that the courts are going to ultimately have the final say on this if it is challenged not the police so in Castorina the judge said "Suspicion by itself, however, will not justify an arrest. There must be a factual basis for it of a kind which a court would adjudge to be reasonable."

[@jgfox1983]

marcuscleaver thank you for responding. I appreciate that

[@glennewell2436]

I assume that stealing a sandwich is not an indictable offence and if so how did the police gain entry to the premises?

[@marcuscleaver]

The officers essentially told him they had to do a search before he was given bail. At trial it was accepted the the defendant had not consented to the search and it was therefore illegal. While the magistrate excluded evidence on this basis, this was overturned on appeal. The Divisional Court judge said that the discretion to exclude evidence should only be used when the police have deliberately tricked the defendant or acted in a morally reprehensible manner. Tbh this particular search felt like it was on the border of morally reprehensible and the case might likely be decided differently today.

[@glennewell2436]

Thanks Marcus

[@rlees76]

Brilliant

[@alveeindersingh229]

Does this covers the as law as well?

[@marcuscleaver]

No idea, pal.

[@indianocean1331]

Hello sir Your video is really helpful to understand public law. Sir I need advice on a scenario how to advice someone under PACE will you be able to guide me please ?

[@givmespace]

hello. if you have evidence and it comes to light that it was acquired improperly/illegal by the police. can that alone get the evidence thrown out of court. or is it still possible that the evidence is admissible as long as it does not make the trial unfair?

[@marcuscleaver]

Generally any evidence is allowed although as you correctly point out since 1998 there has been a move to exclude evidence that compromises the fairness of the trial. The "fruit from the poisonous tree" doctrine is mainly just from America.

[@givmespace]

Hi thank you for the reply!. ok so if i search a house without warrant and obtain evidence which is relevant to the case in question, but that evidence offers no probative value, it just serves to make the jury angry at D; that evidence will be inadmissible as it would be unfair against D?

[@marcuscleaver]

It depends on the interpretation by the judge as I can't think of a similar case to that but that does seem like a decent example.

[@givmespace]

thanks for taking the tine to reply i really appreciate it. Have a nice day and i subscribed to your channel :)

[@hazzzdot1137]

Hello Marcus, what would happen if a person resisted arrest and actually ran from the police

[@marcuscleaver]

+Haroon Ahmad well if the arrest is unlawful you can apply Christie v Leachinsky [1947] otherwise you're looking at s. 89 Police Act 1996.

[@haroonahmad6764]

Thank you ever so much, I was just wondering if a person is about to be told the reasons for his stop and search, and ran away, what would happen

[@scottsound4711]

A Judge ruled the other day , it is ok to run from the pigs , if you are not under aressed ...

[@azrahussain6857]

Thank you☺️

[@tcs313]

Is there any way I can download this PowerPoint file?

[@londonrider3219]

Thank you

[@alanjones-6639]

This is now Feb 2018. Does it still apply now, or has it changed for the worse

[@marcuscleaver]

Yes you should be fine still using it now. No major recent changes on this subject.

[@alanjones-6639]

marcuscleaver .....well done and thank you again...

[@lizzypasta1233]

Hi Marcus, do you have the citations for any of the cases mentioned? Thank you!

[@alanjones-6639]

Thank you great info video.

[@swisscheese8628]

I cant reply to you're comment..they need reasonable grounds to suspect you're carrying something illegal and that could be anything they say,the way you're walking the way you act,basically anything they make up

[@nijhoque4856]

U can’t remove hats.

[@Lucario_ae]

With the right powers u can nearly do anything

[@cristinarizzi7163]

THANKS! :)

[@MsRated1]

THANK YOU!!!!! :)

[@salvator6811]

Veteran at being stopped n searched 9/10 tho they do what they want and get there way use sum reason to search u, it's always a fine line these arguments and they don't really work IMO.

[@scottsound4711]

England is a Common Law Country .....Stautes and Acts are not laws .. there rules ideas codes(legalease)and need you to aggree with them(Consent) .

[@jamessettrey9386]

There are inaccuracies in this, Stop Search. Cannot remove hat. Information needed to be given use GOWISELY. I stopped watching better to watch someone that knows.

[@marcuscleaver]

Don't make assertions on this channel, please provide evidence. Here is government information on removal of outer clothing (eg hats) www.gov.uk/police-powers-to-stop-and-search-your-rights

[@gavinmiller690]

This is a bad video, there are major mistakes in the stop & search section alone. It is missing loads on premisis search, 17, 18(1&5) & 32. Better off consulting online versions with PACE and RIPA.

[@hannahetheridge3075]

Thanks 😊