Edit Your Landscape Photos to Create Dimension with Photoshop & Lightroom | B&H Event Space

[@MrWitmis]

Super professional, informative and helpful. Thanks a lot.

[@melissahall7009]

Love her teaching!!

[@Julius_S]

Have loved your photography for years, it's really great to see your process. Thanks for the great video!

[@guido_laremi]

poor video quality to appreciate the edits...

[@onairsebcycling]

Came for the edits. Stayed for the Tool t-shirt.

[@jimmyjavalog]

how had nobody thumbs upped this yet?!

[@EhtishamHaider-p8o]

The video quality sucks. Apart from that it’s an informative video❤

[@AntonAverin]

Thanks for digital art, but it's not photography.

[@hyperslavk8306]

Why people so negative for doing sky replacent, while everyone uses LR? If you tell it is not photography, stop using programs for enhancement of photos and make photos on film.

[@Buttercup697]

I’d have gotten fired from my newspaper staff position for doing this stuff… it’s digital montage art using photos as a source of inspiration.

[@doderiolarkisso4038]

@@Buttercup697 well, newspapers do kinda have to reflect reality..sometimes..

[@highwhen]

This is a fraud.

[@adventuresofjandk]

So much for all the true photographers that actually chase light. If you are doing sky replacement you are no photographer. You are a fraud. As simple as that.

[@jameskelson1891]

I would not call it fraud even if digital manipulation is beyond what most of us consider to be photography. Plenty of people consider themselves to be digital artists and enjoy the creative aspects of that. On top of that there is a continuum. Even "straight" photographers have been known to remove distracting elements or tweak the saturation slider. Ansel Adams was a master of darkroom burning and dodging to add drama and impact. Anyone who wants to sit in front of a computer for hours working on enhancements and modifications of a single photo is welcome to it.

[@Julius_S]

@@jameskelson1891 Yeah, agree - this comment is wildly and unnecessarily dismissive. Professional photographers have been doing sky replacements since literally the 1850's - see "Jenny" by Henry Peach Robinson. If you look at Jess' work I don't see how anyone could claim she doesn't "chase light." She's consistently out in very remote locations often photographing from sunset through sunrise for a single incredibly-detailed and masterfully-crafted image that very few people have the skill and eye to create

[@rioosodog]

If you want to do journalistic shooting that is fine and to be so much of a snob that you can't appreciate ARTISTIC interpretations of scenes that is fine also, but to be a hater is not cool. Besides, go find Ansel Adams' book called "The Print" and tell me that his "dodge and burn" schedules are anything but a FRAUD by your interpretation of art! Anyone that shoots digital knows that the images that come out of them have been manipulated because sensors don't capture REAL colors. They have been manipulated by an engineer in a basement of some big corporation.

[@adventuresofjandk]

@@rioosodog 😂. Ansel Adams did not replace sky’s.

[@rioosodog]

@@adventuresofjandk We are talking a matter of degrees. Like I said unless you look at the dodge and burn schedules by Ansel you are delusional. There is the added fact that if you want to be hateful because YOU don't like the process it is not nice... there are people that would call anyone a FRAUD for not using film. We, as artists have a hard enough time making ends meet without the snobbery. Then there is the FACT that "fine art can"t be anything but B&W.......!