Effect Monsters Were a Mistake in Volume 5

[@JanjoZone]

Listen to my extended thoughts here! > www.patreon.com/c/Janjo

[@musvijajuzagrilariocara8583]

My theory about the direct attackers is that they were made basically to explain the rule that not every monster can attack directly. Not everyone reads the rule book and the combat system in yugioh is a pretty large section of the rules.

[@JanjoZone]

Possibly! That would be a good reason

[@Bad_Gazpacho]

Hey, now. Pale Beast was a threat back when we were swinging with Witty Phantoms and Terra the Terribles.

[@Ledluver]

Yo pass me suma' that Bio plant 😵‍💫👍

[@christiancinnabars1402]

I've always wondered why Black Skull Dragon was given a higher rarity than Meteor Black Dragon in Master Duel even though it has lower Attack. It's even more odd now that I know Meteor Black Dragon (and also the R rarity Blue-Eyes Ultimate Dragon) was even limited to being a prize card for a bit, while Black Skull Dragon was widely available off the bat. Is Archfiend support (whatever that means in modern Yugioh) and a somewhat more supported fusion material really worth that much? It's still just an effectless 3.2K beater.

[@kingofgrim4761]

I’m assuming this is the last set included in the “Kaiba the revenge” power of chaos game, since most of these cards are about as far as I can think of in there, minus a few like Gemini elf

[@justanotheremptychannel2472]

Wow, my childhood's fav high-level monster effect's was actually azz originally

[@theentity5201]

Effect monsters were SUCH a mistake given what it's led to today