NOTE: If you plan to use WiFi card slot for M.2. eGPU, better double check that port. Because: 1. If some cases you'll need an adapter to PCIe mini 2. Most likely bandwidth speed will be limited to x1 PCIe line
@foggy8256Ай бұрын
Why your English so Russian?😮
@tuannamtran9030Ай бұрын
Hi. Can i ask you some questions 1. Can i use my WiFi Card Slot for my M.2 SSD 2. How much PCIe bandwidth lane is on the M.2. NVME slot My laptop only have 1 NVME slot so i want to swap my SSD to WiFi Slot and use an USB WiFi. Then i will use Oculink through my NVME slot. I just wonder the bandwidth of its to choose a GPU in my budget. Thanks for your video. Great content.
@thedukeofdeathpt626224 күн бұрын
@@foggy8256 Can't you tell from his accent? It's because he's Slavic (not necessarily Russian)
@daz-kunboiii7792Ай бұрын
man, i used to plan to have a egpu but it price is unaffordable for me so i'd rather buy a whole pc and laptop is just for work. Your video explain very detail. thanks for that
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
And I think that's the right decision. You can find used components and build a decent PC with great upgradability. Wish you the best deals on the component market :)
@onigvd7723 күн бұрын
So my takeaway is Thunderbolt is convenient but not so performant right now, OCULINK is less convenient but more performant. Thunderbolt is more common, but OCULINK may require an adapter. Is that it basically?
@03codey29 күн бұрын
thunderbolt 5 is really going to take things off with 'power up' stations and mobile handheld gaming as a whole
@Fisheee123Ай бұрын
I ordered the egpu dock from aliexpress, ordered a 500w power supply, and just got the Zotac GTX 1070 today. Can't wait to try out the egpu setup. If anyone's wondering, total cost was $255. Dock was $120, Power supply was $40, and GPU was $95 used from ebay. My laptop has a 12th gen i7-1255U 32gb ram MX550 GPU, which is why I'm getting the egpu cus the mx550 is not the best.
@jakerosper9239Ай бұрын
I'd love to hear how it goes for you. I want to do something very similar for short blender rendering.
@baksooobaksooo4816Ай бұрын
Ur cpu is low power.
@mightymallet547429 күн бұрын
Bruh give us an update fr
@Fisheee12329 күн бұрын
@@mightymallet5474 oh yea I forgot I commented this. I ended up finding out that my laptop doesn't have a thunderbolt port, but rather an "always on" USB c port which is also labeled with a similar lightning bolt. I ended up returning everything ☹️
@GhostGamer79925 күн бұрын
@@Fisheee123you could have used m.2 version or pcie of the wifi card
@EnraticАй бұрын
Perfect timing dropping this video
@jambabuckАй бұрын
Quality content and insights here on eGPU options and comparisons. Thank you.
@EzaneeGiresАй бұрын
The editing of this video is really good bro
@Theboss00077Ай бұрын
Not all USB-C eGPU uses PCI 3.0, some of them uses PCI 4.0 x 4 lines like ADT-UT3G which give higher bandwidth with better performance.
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
I hadn't noticed it before, and no wonder why. It's very hard to find any decent information on it even now. Apparently it can run faster on USB4 devices, but it's still a way off 4x4.0 Looks interesting though, thanks for the info
@Theboss00077Ай бұрын
@@trysometech52 Yes it doesn’t give the full bandwidth of 4x4.0 because of the limits of USB 4 which is 40 gbps, but it give higher bandwidth than 4x3.0, which is about 30 gbps.
@truonghothien75926 күн бұрын
It could reach oculink's level on pcie 3.0
@daniel_izraelАй бұрын
awesome videos😯 let's chill with simple thunderbolt connection and wait for tb5 :D
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
Thanks man! Sounds like a plan :)
@ciw86887 күн бұрын
Any info on when will tb5 come out?
@SplarkszterАй бұрын
Would be cool to see the PCIe 4 x8 performance with the Framework16. We would need to adapt their thing to oculink but there are some projects on the framework forum already.
@ominousviewАй бұрын
Thanks for the video. I see similar increases between the 2 connections depending on resolutions (i.e. CP77 benchmark with the X1 and onexgpu (7600m XT) 33%-52% increase from TB vs oculink 1440p-1080p, X1 with a SGWzone 4060 desktop, same benchmark 28-41% increase from TB to oculink). Yes it's more convenient for TB and some games just don't need oculink bandwidth to play 120fps at 1440p or even 200+fps so I save oculink for more demanding games if I don't have access to my 3080 desktop
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
Cool. That's a smart way to use it :)
@AdzzVR13 сағат бұрын
What would you say could match up with a Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 125U (12 Cores/14 threads) + 16 GB LPDDR5-6400 MHz RAM running with Thunderbolt 4 (40Gbps signaling rate)?
@EargasmicAudioShackInternalАй бұрын
Thanks for the inputs, I'm planning to make a back up gaming rig via egpu with a Dell Latitude 5400 with i7-8665u. This video gave me ideas for the build.
@kaelt755 күн бұрын
Awesome, thank you so much!
@Russiangamerpro2021Ай бұрын
A lot of people don’t make too much videos about EGPU maybe make more videos of it by using it to plug-in directly to a handheld because they might up to 80 gigs of speed by using USB 5
@vonhellusКүн бұрын
Maybe a stupid question but would this work with Alienware alpha r2? Like the stronger version of the steam machine
@RobloxianX8 күн бұрын
TB5 will be even beefier than Occulink. eGPUs will do incredibly well with Mini PCs
@RK-qn7tgАй бұрын
So what better thunderbolt or oculik WHAT TO BUY?
@Nicky_TM28 күн бұрын
OCuLink if possible, better performance and pricing although a bit more hassle
@Samwsd23 күн бұрын
first you need a oculink port or external pcie oculink device
@wayne8797Ай бұрын
Jumped on the egpu bandwagon with a mini pc and dock from Ali too. Still waiting on the dock but I already received my RX6800 and corsair RMx PSU that’s supposed to be very quiet. My first pc build in 20 years 😂 all for the sake of sim racing 😅
@TheRochlan3 күн бұрын
You mentioned in your video that all existing eGPU docs are built on Thunderbolt 3 specs, i.e. it doesn't make sense to use them on TB 4. What about those eGPU docks which are advertised on Aliexpress as being compatible with both versions (3 and 4)? Or is this really just saying "it will work with TB 4, but with the specs/limitations of TB 3 with regards to downwards-compabitility", i.e. you won't get TB4 bandwith with these eGPU docks, even if your laptop supports it? Also, is it better to use shorter TB cables to get the most bandwith (most docks come with 0.5 to 2m cables)?
@trysometech523 күн бұрын
I think they're just saying that it will work on TB4/TB3 because of backwards compatibility and they have the same bandwidth limit. Regarding cables - it will work on max bandwidth on 2m cable just like on 0.5m.
@jasonross843415 күн бұрын
Hello! If i go for the M.2/Occulink from laptop to the thunderblot egpu chassis, will i then be able to connect my thunderbolt monitor by thunderbolt cable to the egpu board rather than then the GPU card HDMI to HDMI?
@AmybnuyАй бұрын
Having to restart is such a pain tho :p Maybe thunder bolt 5 will rescue us
@danebeee1Ай бұрын
Would,love to see a video about your method for that p.c. gaming setup for your bed!! Not many videos on KZbin showing how to do that well.
@faizannabi7540Ай бұрын
I don't have oculink port on my pc what can I do use converter to pcie or thunderbolt will it affect bandwidth?
@tdm3brosАй бұрын
hold up, I've heard that it works on both USB-C 4 and Thunderbolt 3 or later (without the need for AMD),
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
Yep, I said exactly the same. USB4 or Thunderbolt 3/4. There is also text hint: not necessary to be AMD for USB4
@damson3413Ай бұрын
let's be clear here, most gpu activity does not use the full x16 bandwidth, it's A LOT of bandwidth and for most of the time it's just not used, it's mainly for loading textures and data onto the GPU, so basically, the only thing link bandwidth beyond a single pcie 4.0 lane will affect is load times. making sure the pcie lanes connect at the latest standard version of pcie that all your hardware can do is more important. I've run thunderbolt gpus before, the only real overhead with it is the fact that you're sending the video back over the thunderbolt cable and onto the laptop's screen, so just buy a better gpu lol.
@thiagofacanha208116 күн бұрын
Hello. In order to turn on the oculink egpu we just need to turn on the power suply? or the board has any kind of button? Thxs
@trysometech5215 күн бұрын
Hey, power supply is always turned on, but there is a power button on the board itself
@BrentMaxwellianАй бұрын
Super interesting - thanks!
@SplarkszterАй бұрын
Wish i could enable usb4 in my Yoga 16ARP8... the 14arp8 and ideapad 16arp8 do have usb4, I don't understand that.
@danieldiazgiraldo8337Ай бұрын
:) as always, nice video!. Soon I will see ETA prime competing with you.
@user-qw9jj5gf9dАй бұрын
Здорово, пойду и себе куплю
@tylocookАй бұрын
Do you ever have problems hot plugging thunderbolt? For me, something about either my enclosure, my cable, my device, or my operating system means it frequently fails to work and I end up having to restart almost every time.
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
Usually everything works fine. I've had a few instances of Legion Go disconnecting when moving the handheld, but that's more of a port issue + cable bend.
@tylocookАй бұрын
@@trysometech52 Interesting. My GPD Win 4 only ever recognizes my eGPU when I plug it in during the boot-up process. If I plug it in when the machine is already running, it always fails.
@THESHADOW9713927 күн бұрын
Hello So there is no PCIe 16x to PCIe 16x riser??
@KosmatyWilczekАй бұрын
Thank you, you do one of the most interesting GPU related benchmarks out there. Just want to confirm. Are you sure you have not hit any (even if little) bottleneck with 4090? 40%~ usage (for example for God of war) for CPU may be misleading based on cores utilisation. It is just weird to see below 99% for GPU in direct connection.
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
Hey, glad to hear that. Thanks! Regarding CPU, I have a video where I compared it to 14900K in games - kzbin.info/www/bejne/eYPZqGCArc2Cn7c Also check pinned comment there, because I had even better results there.
@-iIIiiiiiIiiiiIIIiiIi-Ай бұрын
Bro, nobody is talking about Thunderbolt 4 when comparing to Oculink. EVERYONE wants Thunderbolt 5 to come out and take a shit on Oculink and bury it under the sands of time.
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
I think we're on the same page :D But compared to what we have at the moment
@heshijieАй бұрын
mcio for egpu is way better than tbt5
@ciw86887 күн бұрын
@@heshijiewhat is mcio?
@benhillard919Күн бұрын
@@ciw8688thank is mini cool edge if I remember correctly
@VioletEvaАй бұрын
Hey just a some question, i heard from reddit and Eta prime that AMD RX is not very optimized for egpu is this true? I've seen rtx 3060 outperforms the rx 6750 xt. Maybe you can test it in the future with the same performance bracket e.g. rtx 3060 vs rx 6600? Thank you so much!
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
Can't say for sure, haven't used AMD GPUs for a while.. but maybe in the future i'll get one
@VioletEvaАй бұрын
@@trysometech52 Thanks for the reply! I'll look forward to it!
@Jeetmon_ZadgeАй бұрын
That definitely looks like Spider Man at 7:23 😂
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
Oops 👀
@Jeetmon_ZadgeАй бұрын
@@trysometech52 just human error lol
@rob-the-goose19 күн бұрын
could you in theory use a m.2 adapter to usb c and plug that into the thunderbolt port instead of losing your wifi card or nvme?
@aithernight19 күн бұрын
I'm pretty sure you'd lose the same amount of performance as normal thunderbolt
@yijiazhan45Ай бұрын
I have a Thunderbolt egpu, and a G14 laptop with a Ryzen 7 6800 CPU and USB4. Considering RX6800, RX7800xt, and 4070 Super. May I get some recommendations on which one to get please?
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
In this budget I bought a 4070S for myself and used it as an eGPU in my previous video. I just don't mind using DLSS3 and AMD's FSR isn't that good yet in my opinion.
@NoBodysGamerАй бұрын
If you dont care about ray tracing and DLSS, 7800XT will be faster.
@RecommendableАй бұрын
I bet you can't wait to get that thunderbolt 5 in your hands :P
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
Oh yeah, you're goddamn right :D
@Russiangamerpro2021Ай бұрын
They did said USB 4 port will work fine directly to external graphic card because they said it’s comfortable with Thunderball for directly to USB 4 means you can get some transfer speed really well to get some performance boost in the future future that they will fly away that USB 5 five up to 80 gigs of speed
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
Bro, sorry but I have no idea what you're saying. Но ты можешь попробовать на русском)
@Ra896Ай бұрын
@@trysometech52LMAO
@Russiangamerpro202126 күн бұрын
@@trysometech52 sorry it’s just I using speech to text by using a microphone so I don’t know how to type. I have a learning disability so I meant thunderbolt 5 port
@LuminousSpaceАй бұрын
multiple monitor setup with usb4 stutter a lot, so oculink really is the way to go for now
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
Only if one of them internal screen. External screens doesn't affect bandwidth as far as I know.
@LuminousSpaceАй бұрын
Idk i teat it out with one browser open 9 videos and the other running game, the game perform as bad as 780m@@trysometech52
@RicardoSalinasFournierАй бұрын
Hi! What base do you recommend? The OcuP4 or the Beast Oculink from your previous video?
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
Hey, the OcuP4 just has a more stable stand and it works with my handheld because of the power button. The Beast has the same performance for less money, so it's up to you :)
@RicardoSalinasFournierАй бұрын
@@trysometech52 thanks for the response! Currently I have a 2080Ti connected to my laptop via TB4. Do you think the performance will improve if I connect them via M2 with the Beast Oculink?
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
Yes there will be a little improvement over TB just like I showed in this video with RTX 2060. Just keep in mind that 2080Ti is also PCIe Gen 3. So you will not get full benefits of Oculink port. Also don't use Wifi m.2. slot for that, I recently figured out that it most likely will be not x4, but x1 PCIe lines.
@RicardoSalinasFournierАй бұрын
@@trysometech52 thanks for all the info. I’ve just bought the oculink beast. Hope arrive soon. And I will connect them to an ssd m2 port. When they arrive I will send you my results! Thanks a lot
@RicardoSalinasFournierАй бұрын
Hi! Yesterday I’ve received the Beast base. It works great with my 2080ti. It performs better than the TB4 connection. I was thinking to upgrade to a Rtx 3070 but my M2 port is Gen3. Soooo, I don’t know if it worth it. It will be limited by the bandwidth. What do you think?
@DaddyBensonАй бұрын
I’m using this power bank for my Rog Ally. But it can’t activates the 30W mode of it, regardless that its OUT2 port supports 65W output. Except for that I have no complaints.
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
Hmm, I just checked on my handheld. I had around ~85w from OUT1 and ~55w from OUT2. But my battery on handheld is around 50%, we should also take that into count.
@DaddyBensonАй бұрын
@@trysometech52 Neither works on OUT1. On their label, out1 doesn’t support 20V*3.25A 65W output, so this is expected.
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
I am not a pro in this question, but it works for me, so it's possible. Are you sure that we have the same version? I know that there is the same looking but older one. Also if all 3 ports are used - power output is different. And last point is cable - make sure that it's good. Mine supports up to 100w of power delivery.
@orez1236Ай бұрын
what about this EGO1-M eGPU
@pisosyam22 күн бұрын
Привет. Что думаешь на счет lenovo thinkbook 14+ и внешней видеокарты по oculink? По-моему, хороший мобильный cpu способен обеспечить норм производительность в играх
@trysometech5220 күн бұрын
В теории заучит круто, но обзоров ещё не видел на него. Да и вроде как их тяжело достать
@dankewurstАй бұрын
There are laptops with Oculink. Intel Ultra Powered Lenovo ThinkBook 14+ & 16+ 2024
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
I showed them on as upcoming laptops at 3:02, but I didn't find any info that they were already released. At least at the moment of preparing script.
@patchface_foolАй бұрын
@@trysometech52the were released in China. It is complicated to buy them as of now.
@izack0128Ай бұрын
0:07 Ahh the comment gave me "🤡" aura.
@teckmology4824Ай бұрын
So any laptop with usb 4 can run egpu?
@NoBodysGamerАй бұрын
If your laptop has USB4, yes, you can use both TB4 and USB4 dock, BUT TB4 dock is 1gb faster, there is only ONE brand that makes such GPU docks for now and they have no charging, but they 30% faster VS the BEST TB4 dock, you basically get FULL PCIe Gen3 X3 speed TB4 dock on USB4 PC: 2500 device to host and host to device USB4 dock on USB4 PC: 3500-3700 device to host and host to device The worst speed is on Intel, TB4 on Intel will be 2200-2300MB/s
@duyethoangnam2262Ай бұрын
can i use my usb c on thinkpad e590
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
4:23 :D
@user-sl2jm9wz6j3 күн бұрын
32 gbps is pcie 3.0?
@trysometech523 күн бұрын
4 lines of PCIe 3.0, yes
@EnochGitongaKimathi3 күн бұрын
I'm very disappointed with Intel that Thunderbolt 5 is not integrated on Lunar Lake. By the time Intel get their stuff in order iGPUs will make Thunderbolt eGPUs obsolete.
@trysometech523 күн бұрын
yeah.. it seems that TB5 will come in 2025
@EnochGitongaKimathi3 күн бұрын
@@trysometech52 I highly doubt it. Panther Lake will be integrating Thunderbolt 4 just like Meteor Lake and Lunar Lake. Many OEMs are not going to be implementing the Barlow Ridge Controller due to extra costs. Alao the performance of a Discrete Controller is not as good as when integrated. Mass adoption will only happen when it is integrated. This is the advantage Apple have with Thunderbolt, they don't have to wait for Intel. For Apple there is no really benefit of moving to Thunderbolt 5 since they don't support eGPUs anyway. So sadly no, I don't think we'll see much traction with Thunderbolt 5 until 2026,fingers crossed.
@trysometech522 күн бұрын
But somehow they managed to put TB5 into 14th gen CPU in Razer 18, right? But anyway we need to wait for the first TB5 eGPU
@EnochGitongaKimathi2 күн бұрын
@@trysometech52 what comedy. The Razer 18 is a desktop replacement laptop with a discrete GPU. It makes no sense to use an eGPU with it.
@trysometech522 күн бұрын
@@EnochGitongaKimathi Obviously no one is gonna use eGPU with it lol, I didn't mean that
@genma986Ай бұрын
Oculink all the way.
@ciw86887 күн бұрын
At 5:27 why is the 4060 is not on the list?
@trysometech526 күн бұрын
Dunno, but it should be there
@NikhilKumar-yq1fxАй бұрын
Bro buy new razer blade 18 with thunderbolt 5 and then try e gpu on it
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
eGPUs with Thunderbolt 5 doesn't exist yet, we have to wait for it
@NikhilKumar-yq1fxАй бұрын
@@trysometech52 i travels a lot So i am stuck on a 4090 sff build with water cooling or a laptop ? But i want to play heavy demanding games ! So which one i choose !
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
@@NikhilKumar-yq1fx PC is always better in terms of performance, but even SFF will be a heavy brick. eGPU with a case will be almost SFF PC size. So if you travel a lot, I'd stick to a powerful laptop and ignore eGPU topic.
@maxanderson918725 күн бұрын
You do realize a 1+ minute sponsorship post means over 10% of your entire content is shilling?
@npaisarapper20 күн бұрын
It's a good video, and 10% isn't that much.
@NoBodysGamerАй бұрын
This video is filled with tons of small errors and maybe outright misinformation. Also the benchmarks are confusing as hell, why not state what device use and not just bandwidth, bandwidth is meaningless, and tehre is no end graph to compare all games. he says there are 3 types of connection types and lists Oculink and M.2 separately. oculink and M.2 is the same exact thing, Oculink is not a protocol but connection type, extension cable. he says Oculink is Gen 4, while in reality it can be anything,Gen 1, Gen 2, Gen 3 , Gen4, Gen 5, it depends on your PCIe and where you plug it and what cable adapter you use or if its factory made then to where they soldered it. In his example of connecting to WiFi slot, he didn't said a word that WiFi connectors are PCIe Gen2 or 3 x1 [most moderns laptops usually have gen3 x1], they 4 times slower than standard m.2 and much slower than TB4/USB4. The main types of connection options are these: 1] PCIe Direct [Full Speed] 2] PCIe extensions: Oculink, M2, PCIe Extension cable. These are usually x4, but can go up to x16. Oculink comes in x4 and x8 versions, if you plug a x8 Oculink adapter into full sized PCIe slot, you'll get Oculink x8, both the adapter and the cable available on amazon/ali and other sites, if you buy long PCIe x16 extender, can be a meter [with reDrivers even longer], you'll get x16 full speed. [There are MORE options, like the cables that used for SAS and U.2: Adapter > Cable > PCIe Dock] 3] TB4 [2200Mb/s to 2700Mb/s depends on the dock and the host] 4] USB4 [3500MB/s-3700Mb/s depends on the USB4 dock and USB4 Host] Using the same brand of TB4 dock he has in his video the Host to device and device to host, on AMD platform will be 2500-2700MB/s [Legion Go]. Connected to Intel: 200-300MB/s LESS. [X1 Intel] If you use USB4 dock, you Gain 1Gb: USB4 Dock on USB4 handheld like Legion Go you get 3500-3700MB/s Host to device and Device to Host. USB4 on AMD USB4 host gives you the same performance as Gen3 x4 NVMe SSDs, you basically max the PCIe Gen3 x4 speed! The only Benefit of Oculink vs USB4 only if Oculink supports PCIe Gen4, in case its pluged to Gen3 and your system has USB4, go with USB4 for ease of use [hot plug, but right now lacks charging]. USB4 is 1Gb faster, because USB4 doesn't dedicated 1Gb for USB passtrought, TB does it all the time, even if the dock has no USB ports! Because of this protocol change even TB4 dock [like his in the video, i have the same one] that is pluged to USB4 Host [Legion Go/ X1 AMD] gains free 200-300Mb/s boost vs. Intel Host that uses native TB4. Next gen Intel like Arrow Lake should come with Native USB4 host, so everybody will be happy, but right now AMD wins twice: TB4 on AMD is 200-300MB/s faster AND AMD has USB4 docks that 1gb faster than TB4 [sold on Ali for 100-120USD]. Also as i mentioned his benchmarks are confusing for most people, he should of written TB/Oculink/PCIe x16, instead of writing bandwidth, bandwidth doesn't say anything to most people. Also it would be nice to get a slide with just numbers table that compares everything, even excel file screenshot.
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
I always take criticism or corrections positively, and if I'm wrong somewhere, it's certainly not to confuse people deliberately. Some of what you wrote I really hadn't heard of, but other than that you yourself are personally starting to confuse others from the beginning. For example, I didn't say there are 3 types of connectivity, I said there are 3 main types of eGPU. These are completely different things. After that, a lot of what you wrote just doesn't make sense. "benchmarks are confusing for most people" - What makes you say that? You're the only one writing about it :) The rest of us just looked up a little higher in the benchmarks and saw that it was already signed in the GPU name. And thanks to you, they will now realise that if Thunderbolt 3 has about 23gbsp, and they buy a USB4 eGPU for an AMD processor, it will work even better for them. Oh and don't you agree that showing a 2060 that runs on gen3 and just signing ‘Oculink’ wouldn't be quite right?
@NoBodysGamerАй бұрын
@@trysometech52 whats up? The right thing with Benchmarks is just say what GPU it is and what device/dock it runs on, thats how everybody does it and it will be great to have a summary so people can take screenshots of, but you do what you want to do. 3 type of eGPU means they unique, while M.2/Oculink is all the same thing, the difference is what PCI express extension cable you you use, M.2 can be Oculink with M.2 to Oculink adapter, its all same thing and makes no difference [and wifi connection is x1 so it should be mentionedy] hence its better to split them up by connectivity ie PCIe/TB/USB4 and actual real bandwidth [you can check bandwidth by using cuda benchamrk or AIDA]. if you need more info, benchmarks and tools [like fixing nvidia USB4/TB crashes aka error 43 on AMD], join iGPU.io its a great resource.
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
But hey, I mentioned that M.2. and Oculink are compatible and you can combine them :) x1 speed on Wifi slot was a surprise for me, I heard this option from many sources and was sure that this is legit option. I'll add that info in the pinned comment. Thanks!
@RobertBitzerАй бұрын
@@trysometech52 Honestly, I think the simple way you described things was perfect without getting in the weeds...you demonstrated a simple relationship between connections using the most powerful Nvidia GPU available and 4k resolution as the common denominator....you basically helped set expectations in a good way. Nice video, keep it up!
@LordOfLoserАй бұрын
Hey man I think I have the same laptop as you the ThinkPad E14 gen 5 with 13700h can you make a egpu video on it or any ocuilink modification for it ?
@trysometech52Ай бұрын
Nah, mine is gen1. It's pretty old already and I gave it to my parents already :) That video fragments were from my older videos.