Electrogravity--Unified Field Theory -- Release announcement

[@FractalWoman]

Fantastic Robert. Can't wait to see what you have come up with. I will pass this along to my KZbin subscribers.

[@oguardiaodosaber]

Thanks, ypu bring me here. I hope Kenny take this to.

[@zdenekbreza3770]

I don't know, but it could be similar to what Mr. Distinti says. Years ago, we experimented with water vortices. We have found that the water towards the center of the vortex is colder, denser, rotates faster and the pressure drops significantly. And of course it drains (flows away) from the center at high speed perpendicular to the direction of rotation. Like galaxies and their jets. In the middle of the vortex is air or vacuum. What if it's similar to matter and ether? What if matter is the very thin ring of very dense ether with an empty ("empty") inside? In terms of total volume, "mass" would then appear very rare (light, thin) compared to surrounding ether. The density and speed of rotation allow further suction of the surrounding water (ether) - the growth of planets, stars, ... After reaching a certain limit, the vortex either disintegrates or gets rid of a certain part of the material (amount of water). As MasterIvo did on his youtube channel (and not only him) the electric field has its inertia (ether flow), the same is true for the magnetic field (another ether flow) and we perceive the third ether flow as motion, force, ... Therefore matter may not use ether as fuel, but at this place "only" transformation of one ether flow to another occurs (or electrical and magnetic ether flows transform to motion, force ehter flow). The law of conservation of energy is maintained.

[@codetech5598]

Sounds like Viktor Shauberger. I think there are different "temperatures" of Aether and the energy vortex is powered by those temperature differences. Aether of one temperature goes in, and Aether of another temperature comes out.

[@zdenekbreza3770]

@@codetech5598 Yes, the experiments were based on his work. Among other things, we wanted to check whether it is true that if you water the garden with such "treated" water, then whether the harvest really is up to 1/3 higher, 1/3 less water consumption and ripens about 1/3 faster. And we found that to be the case. And the same goes for magnets. And obviously also for the electric field.

[@codetech5598]

@@zdenekbreza3770 One theory about the "treated" water is that the bond angle between the two hydrogen atoms is wider.

[@zdenekbreza3770]

@UCXmEn1ATw6NYk2h4VplTBEA I think the temperature probably just depends on the pressure. Movement, direction of movement and above all frequency determine "only" the temperature gradient or how quickly something heats up or cools down. Frequency and movement do not determine if cooling/warming occurs. If there is pressure in the center of the vortex (current technology, explosive), heating will occur, if there is a negative pressure in the center of the vortex, cooling will occur (implosion, Schauberger). It's still the same vortex, only once the apex of the vortex is at the top (explosive-the higher the frequency, the faster the heating, energy loss-kinetic energy decreases), the second time the apex is at the bottom (implosive, suction-the faster the frequency, the faster the cooling, condensation, kinetic energy increases, energy gain - it is possible to have more energy at the output than at the input).

[@gbpferrao]

I'm so happy youre active Distinti!

[@AmaterasuSolar]

Wish I was not disabled, denied assistance, destitute, and technically homeless. I would help if I could.

[@oguardiaodosaber]

Lets go Retroduction this! Thanks, nobel friend.

[@russellsheridan3957]

I can hear Theoria Apophasis now: "Descriptions are not explanations. Explain what a 'field (phenomenon)' is and what 'forces' are. You can't do it." (Disclaimer: I watch you both.)

[@DeathValleyDazed]

Exciting news!

[@codetech5598]

Can you build a flying saucer?

[@marcmillis3867]

We need to talk about electrodynamic action in the zéro volume élasticity collapsible aether for that. All forces have been unified by Webber in 1846......

[@Blurns]

Yeah, once you realize it's all about manipulating Lorentz force & electrostatic repulsion.

[@door0empty]

I'm going to check your website and see if you have an email listed where I could send you a letter I have quite a few ideas and questions I'd like to share

[@rdistinti]

post your idea on the blog site etherealmechanics.info

[@johnzientek735]

👍

[@davescruton2829]

Electro gravity? Have you made anything physical that proves this theory? Until Engineers can use your information to affect Gravitation on an object, your idea is useless.

[@zackalil2920]

You understand if the math works then the math works right?

[@davescruton2829]

@@zackalil2920 The math works in a million video games it doesn't make it correct. Hell 99,9% of the math in General relativity says it is the correct model but we know it isn't due to the.1%

[@zackalil2920]

@@davescruton2829 What are you saying? If there's logical consistency within the model, and i can guarantee with the spree of consistency math has since the dawn of the model, then all that's left of ambiguity is the philosophical interpretation--- then we delve into metaphysics because that's where you will be able to explain stuff like the Aether and God, and at that point even language fails to grasp and stops at contradictions.

[@davescruton2829]

@@zackalil2920 I am saying if it can't be applied by engineers, it's wrong.

[@zackalil2920]

@@davescruton2829 The "what are you saying" was in disbelief at the ignorant claim. I know what you're saying. Last time I checked, a criteria for Truth wasn't its practical use, or even potential for practical use. What happens now when we get into logic in higher dimensions? Do you just pass off the logical consistency and maintain a skeptical position because of your belief?

[@youdulima]

Gravity is not a force .

[@rdistinti]

Then what is holding your butt to the chair as you type "Gravity is not a force"?