Explain Semiconductors or Fiber Optics without quantum mechanics; you can't.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Where can we get this?

?

We know the output ..u explain maths ....explaint how it does..when we ask how things move explain how it does ...not satrt with probability says

10:30 How can Inertial Gravity be a force? Force is a push or a pull. Force is one part of an Aether Disturbance which has two "vectors" to it. The Outward force vector and the inward Acceleration vector which is inertial and the opposite of force. Force/Acceleration North/South, discharge/charge I use Force to throw (push/disturb/North/Discharge) an object into the air. When the object reaches the end of the force (push/pull/disturbance/North/Discharge) vector, the object accelerates (South/Charge/Gravity) with out a push or pull. Gravity is not a "thing" that is "pulling" or "pushing" an object. Gravity is an innate inertial part of the Object which accelerates (returns/South/Charge) to Aether which is Inertial. Gravity is not Force. Gravity is not Pushing and it is not pulling. The Object is Aether Disturbed and its Acceleration is back to Inertial Aether (rest/power) Gravity is Acceleration which is the Opposite of Force and innate to the Object (aether disturbance)

11:00 So would C be the rate of induction?

The Government corrupts Science through grants and Salaries which they Borrow and we pay interest only through taxes, never principle, which is rolled over into new debt. This is how it got to 35 trillion. It will go to 100 trillion before it ends. Thank God the whole entire system has begun crashing and burning right before our eyes. Its embers will snuff out into 2032. Maybe then The People will be free from the false belief that a Republic with its easily corrupted Representative is the best form of Government and we can then wisely use BlockChain as a Voting Platform in a Direct Democracy where the Government is actually of the People, By the People and For The People

Noone talks about "The feynman "disk" paradox" where a solenoid and some charged spheres produce angular momentum upon achieving EMF. By this logic you can rearrange the experiment and achieve linear momentum (by having the coil as a donut) And by having the external disc charged positively when charging the coil, changing the external disc negatively and discharging the coil you would achieve directional propulsion

The cosmos runs on BOTH the electrical force and gravitational force. AC + DC => ADC. Tensor bosons are the actual formats within space fabrics, and active (non-nuclear) fusion agents. The electric universe people have their electrical force. Leedskalnin has his magnetic force, which is actually the electrogravitics force (which is this dual ADC force). The entire cosmos is tied to the matter tensor bosons and Aether tensor bosinos ... ADC. Meissner force field, Be'nard's Convection in the photosphere, Lord's Convection in the chromosphere, supercompacted space fabric strings and loops in the stellar engine create the fusion agent tensors. Both electrical force overwhelms the Van der Wahl's radius of the ionized electron shells, allowing the gravitational force to fuse the 2 atomic nuclei together overcoming the Coulomb boundary. The gravitational force leaves, then the electrical force leaves, picking up its residual ionization from the electron transitions back to steady state. Spiculae in the photosphere-chromosphere boundary are interlocking Aether domain tensors and Matter tensors. Coronal filaments, coronal loops, and detached coronal mass ejections are all gravitons and tensors. Birkeland currents are cosmic energy levels of tensor bosons. Everything of cosmic tension in the space fabrics and (sub-)quantum entanglement, wave coherence, wave interference, are all tensor ADC forces. Using the word electro-magnetism is an ancient word, only used for the ferromagnetic elements ... and don't even talk about paramagnetics or diamagnetics of all remaining periodic table of elements. They need external applications of increased electrical and gravitational forces (i.e. ADC tensor currents) to make them activate any electrogravitic properties. As such, Distiniti should change out the word electromagnetism for the proper word electrogravitics. In doing so, Distiniti will find that the ES and EG Model gives him all of the remaining format for developing his mechanical models, and using the ADC force, which is Tesla's definition of unlimited energy from the Aether (i.e. ADC forces) as free energy, anti-gravitational properties with electrostatic force fields neutralizing gravitational attraction, creating a worm bubble around an air craft or star craft, giving the opportunity for light speed and warp speed through a moving worm bubble that appears to be a wormhole, negating everything of conventional Einstein General and Special Relavitity, including Newtonian physics. Such are the UAPS/tic tacs having supersessional flying abilities. The ES and EG Model gives the Grand Unified Field Theory, which then allows intelligent advancement into properly manufacturing ambient temperature superconductors (which are "conduits") into the Aether, and downloading Tesla-Birkeland cosmic currents ... unlimited free energies ... into such machines that can then manifest supra-conventional physics ... i.e. magic to the conventionally programmed sock puppets and false teachers of the Standard Model, Big Bang, cosmic expansion, etc. Leedskalnin did use such generator machinery that manifested ADC forces, not electrical force and not gravitational force, but both, thus allowing the proper use of tensor forces to negate gravitational attraction, lifting 20 ton coral limestone blocks and spinning them in all directions, and emplacing them within a coral limestone wall, that can't be done with any telephone pole tripod of a block and tackle pully system. The Coral Castle is the methodology of using ADC tensor boson forces ... that Leedskalnin said was the same technology used in building the pyramids blocks and moving and installing Stonehenge from its previous location. Even Leedskalnin did this with his construction at his first location, then de-construction and movement to Homestead, where he again constructed the Coral Castle with the same technology.

Distinti - more and more the Electrostatic (ES) and Electrogravitic (EG) Model is showing its validity in replacing the entirety (and false concepts of the Standard Model, Big Bang et al ... in recent days it now supports and validates recent European experiments finding "decay" products from smashing Beryllium ... the product is a range of string loop theory, the likes of space-time fabric string theory (gravitons-tensor-gravitons ....) from the atomic neutron. Electrostatic (ES) and Electrogravitic (EG) Model -electron/positron pairing bosons- positron/positron pairing electron transition series Matter universe PARTICLES (5% cosmic mass) operating within light/particle physics and QM/QCD Tau composite energy level -----light speed------ Tau electron Tau positron Tensor Neutron Photon Graviton Lyman (gamma rays) Muon composite energy level Muon electron Muon positron Tensor Neutron Photon Graviton Balmer (UV rays) Electron composite energy level Electron Positron Tensor Neutron Photon Graviton Paschen (visible light) ~~~~~ Quantum boundary, quantum foam, ... actual active CMBR identity (not Big Bang remnant ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -electrino/positrino pairing bosinos- positrino/positrino pairing electron transition series Aether domain PARTICULATES (95% cosmic mass) operating within wave physics and QM/QED Small electron composite energy level -variable light speed- Small electron Small positron Tensor Neutrino Photino Graviton Pfund (infrared) Electrino composite energy level Electrino Positrino Tensor Neutrino Photino Graviton Humphrey (infrared) Graviton (basement) energy level Graviton - Graviton + Tensor Neutrino Photino Graviton Lord (microwave, radio waves)

Ran across Professor Dave a few years ago. Once was enough. 🤡

Dave is a shill

That Professor Dave guy is a mainstream shill who defends the hokey pokey. He probably has videos up about how safe and effective the new RF structures have been over the last 6 years or so.

So interesting to watch this awakening.. For me it started a few years ago with Wheeler. I still think both he and this Gentlemen both are over complicating things. All kinds of crazy vocabulary, diagrams, etc... To me it is extremely simple. Light = Electricity = Gravity. Thin layer, concentration, pulling it away/releasing the concentration. It all starts with the visualization of the electric hyperboloid . . .. ... ..... .......

Lol another EE thinking he knows more than the physicists....

Is there oil off earth? What feeds people off Earth that can't be done on Earth?

Super clear. Would you be interested in doing hering's paradox too?

Hi Robert. I've been folowing the channel for a long time and i remember a video showing how photovoltaic plaques actually heat the ambience higher than CO2 but couldn't find it on the list. Please, could you point me to it? Thanks

Very well explained! Thank you❤❤❤❤❤⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Hello, sorry, I'm not a very bright guy, but how could I explain the fact that the horizontal vector at the beginning was blocked, but then that it came back once the third polarizer was introduced? (though less of it, obviously). Thanks for all your efforts.

You can only introduce such an algebra at the price of giving up the intuitive understanding.

E.H. Kennard performed a modified experiment in 1917. He eliminated the voltmeter circuit and used instead a cilindrical capacitor inside an induction coil. The capacitor charge could be detected subsequently. I recommend the video "Faraday Paradox Unipolar Dynamo Part 2: The Solution" from the plenum88 channel.

Where i can repair the same equipment

Just cut brass tubing using a mini pipe cutter and a drill motor. Works extremely fast using both hands. I then took the cut pieces and placed one in the chuck using needle nose pliers. I then used a needle file to deburr the inner wall while rotating in the drill motor chuck. File for the top edge surface while in running drill motor and all done!

Goodness gracious, you're actually insane. You gotta see someone, mate... Take more drugs or less drugs, idk but your current dose of drugs is NOT correct.

Just what I expected when I read "World Leader in Electromagnetic Physics".

Yes yes reject humanity return to monke....

The Source created the void in the void consciousness created the sound then the sound created light the light created partiki the partiki fluctuated between manifested and antimatter creating frequencies of fusion and fision pulsating matter between this and antimatter universe then this is the origin of electrodynamics and all the phenomena in the universe and anti universe attached to us.

I'll tell you something about physics. Normal physics has a precise measurement with a tiny error factor. Quantum physics is a giant error factor with a normal physics measurement calculation. Quantum physics is the error factor. Seriously, mathematically that's what it is.

Aste Incall astuce mund.

Hi robert.. did you have the chance to look into the tychosium after all? It triggered a lot arguments relative to what is gravity after all.. or how could a gravity theory fit into the tychos. Im really curious on how it could reason with ethereal mechanics. Best regards!

link to video kzbin.info/www/bejne/moSrnJ6elLOcbqM

Many things in science taken as fact are actually interactions between a test device and the equipment. So how we interpret data is critical. Distinti has step by step pulled apart what is actually happening in the world of magnetism. I invite everyone to take this very seriously. America is being left behind on the bleeding edge of science. China and Russia do not get bogged down in any attachments to old models. A day is coming where a switch can be thrown in China and all electricity in America will stop flowing. No war, no missiles, but it will mark the end to this country and the people here. Just examine history and you will find that those who advance in knowledge wipeout those who stand still. Having said this we also have a great opportunity to use this new knowledge to create new clean energy sources. To break our dependance on oil. To eliminate hunger on this planet. To bring modern devices to all people on this planet. So mankind is once again given a choice. To obtain profit from war or help mankind. Our past is not good. But our future can be better.

It can be readily shown with iron filings inside a ring ... place around a magnet ... and there will appear "O"s around the magnet. These are the "right hand" magnetic flux, but it is actually a flux loop (closed) ... or is a closed-loop of a spiral flux. There is no possible left-hand rule, because no matter how you look at the flux line, it always shows the right hand rule.

I bought the X-E version and I was missing the extra digit of resolution on a regular basis. As I result, I also purchased the X version. So I did not really save $150 but instead cost myself $400. Fortunately, I have a use for the X-E version. My advice is that make sure you don’t need that extra digit. On both units, I have to say I am very pleased with them and I would buy the X version again. Also, the remote control using the Ethernet port works as advertised. (I did not use Siglent’s software but I wrote my own software for a PC.)

None, seem to take into account the application of centrifugal force on a conductor in the presence of a magnetic field as the cause of this apparent paradox. The stress applied to the conductor rises from the center to the periphery, as should amperage. Try testing with variable contact points from close axial to rim to see what I imply..

There is no such thing as a radio wave. What we always have is radio pulses. A radio pulse is not photons. Photons are not em waves. A radio pulse is a an em pulse. Electrons do not make a radio signal (pulses). Elektons make radio signals. Elektons are photons that are hugging the surface of the say Cu wire, propagating at the speed of light, giving us elekticity (on the wire).

Robert.. have you looked into the tychosium by Simon Shack?

Finally solved. m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/gZ2TXqaBl7-mga8&pp=ygUXRmFyYWRheXMgUGFyYWRveCBzb2x2ZWQ%3D I need to thank the producers of this video and the entire KZbin experimenter community.

Nooe, that 'artifact' is not the 'edge current'

Please also review the Ether theory of Delbert Larson

Very good video. In vacuum, even visible light can ionize but the degree of ionization depends on the wavelength. It is the ion thrust that spins the radiometer.

TL;DR: You can rigorously multiply and divide vectors using a framework that already exists: Tensor Analysis. You have really only invented a notation, not new math. Vortrix algebra is tensor algebra. would be nice to see an example worked out so we know what the vortrices mean. I am fascinated with your work, and I really do want you to succeed. The way I see it is that you found that you needed a vector multiply and vector divide to express your work. Upon not finding any, you decided to create your own, starting with Q-vectors and working up to Vortrix Algebra once you found out that Q-vectors were ambiguous in 3D. It turns out however that there actually is a framework for multiplication and division of a vector, one that preserves all properties by collecting them in a matrix, something Relativists and engineers use all the time in Special and General Relativity, moments of inertia, internal stresses, etc. It goes by many names but the most popular are Tensor Algebra, Tensor Analysis, and Tensor Calculus. These matrices have special properties that allow them to be used with any coordinate system, not just cartesian, thus making them a Tensor. There are many different sources that will explain this to you, though I have found quite little that explain it intuitively; the explanations are usually centered around mathy terms like Vector Spaces, Tensor Spaces, etc.) Tensor Calculus was invented by Einstein, Ricci, Weyl, and others, and uses index notation and the Einstein Summation Convention. The main ideas to wrap your head around are Covariance and Contravariance (these are the “Flavors” of the components that make up the vector or tensor). An invariant vector can be decomposed into contravariant components multiplied by (”Contracted On”) the covariant basis vectors, (which is how we typically use them. The contravariant components are collectively one object and is called a Vector. The covariant components are called a Covector. Covariance means something varies jointly, contravariance means it varies inversely. (Inverse to what?) the basis vectors you are familiar with, i,j,k, etc. there are also basis tensors which are “Tensor Products” of the basis vectors) If a transformation inputs a vector, it must spit out a vector of the same flavor as the input. The great thing about this is that your result can be shown entirely with vector algebra, even if it’s a complicated one, and all the tensor stuff can happen in the middle. This is one reason that Vortrix Algebra cannot be so advanced that the result cannot be explained in vector terms. If an equation cannot be expressed with vector operations, it is not a vector expression. However, what goes on in the middle cannot always be calculated with vector algebra; that’s where tensor analysis comes along and saves the day. *Alterations to the tensor ideology that I have made to suit our needs are that division by a contravariant vector is equal to multiplication by the covariant components divided by the squared magnitude. This actually flows straight from Tensor Analysis, but I have seen no mention of it anywhere (probably because not many people feel the need to divide two vectors), so I had to verify that it does, indeed, follow all the tensor transformation laws. This is because the squared magnitude is literally the covariant components multiplied by the contravariant components, a de-facto self-dot-product. (I will definitely be using this in the future should the situation arise.) However, I was not able to come up with such a transformation for the basis vectors which are themselves entirely distinct abstract entities, and while the invariant vectors can be decomposed with respect to a basis, it is impossible to decompose the basis with respect to itself. Furthermore, the squared magnitude of the basis vectors is different in different coordinate systems, whereas the squared magnitude of an invariant vector is an invariant. It turns out, however, that this quirk is actually beneficial, as it tells you whether the multiplication forms an invariant vector or a variant tensor. “[T]he products [and divisions] of even numbers of [invariant] vectors (even products) result in matrices [Tensors], odd products [and divisions] result in [invariant] vectors.” An altered quote by Robert Distinti, VortrixAlgebra_V1p3.pdf. When I was deriving NEV5 from the Pretonic Tensor Field, after the derivative I was left with (invariant vector quantities are enclosed in braces here) the following: ({Z}_i)/({Z}_j). This meant I had to multiply by (r^i)({Z}_j), so I knew there would be dot products involved. One of the useful things about tensors is that, although a proper multiplication or division of vectors cannot be commutative or associative as you have shown, the components of the vectors are, because they are just collections of numbers representing an intermediate process. What Tensor Analysis does is it pushes the non-commutativity and non-associativity as far to the end of the calculation as it can, making it a trivial case (Technically, since tensor equations only contain the components and don’t contain any basis vectors, this problem never occurs. But I find the basis vector abstraction useful in the understanding): {A}{B} = a {i} b {j} = a b {i} {j} [{i}/{j}] {j} = {j} [{i}/{j}]= {i} [{j}/{j]] = {i}, where i, j, and k are all basis vectors. When you initially take an ambiguous expression and attempt to ‘tensorify’ it, there are many ways of doing it that result in vastly different expressions. When you write a tensor equation using index notation, the placement of the indices removes all ambiguity from the expression (Ambiguity is for Mystics). For example, taking your Pretonic Vortrix equation, I was able to ‘tensorify’ it in 3 different ways, all of which gave very different NEV5 equations. However, I realize that Vortrix Algebra has very strict rules on the order of operations, so I picked the ‘tensorification’ that fit with those rules. Ironically, following these rules reveals that the Pretonic Matrix Field is actually just a scalar field written as a matrix. In other words, it is an invariant, 0-dimensional numerical expression that only looks like a matrix because it is hidden behind the interim steps of the Vortrix notation. Unfortunately, using these Vortrix rules also results in an incorrect equation for New Induction. For more information on tensors and tensor analysis, here are some resources that have helped me: The Poor Man’s Introduction to Tensors (Paper): justincfeng.github.io/Tensors_Poor_Man.pdf Tensor Calculus - Faculty of Khan (Video Series): kzbin.info/aero/PLdgVBOaXkb9D6zw47gsrtE5XqLeRPh27 Introduction to Tensor Calculus - Pavel Grinfeld (Video Series): kzbin.info/aero/PLlXfTHzgMRULkodlIEqfgTS-H1AY_bNtq Introduction to Tensor Analysis and the Calculus of Moving Surfaces - Pavel Grinfeld (Book): www.amazon.com/gp/product/1461478669/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1461478669&linkCode=as2&tag=freeboundarie-20&linkId=57NNIQE5GSUZXPNB&ICTYTNew Tensors for Beginners - Eigenchris (Video Series): kzbin.info/aero/PLJHszsWbB6hrkmmq57lX8BV-o-YIOFsiG Tensors: Richard Feynman: www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_31.html Keep up the good work. P.S. It would be much appreciated if you would reply to this post. Obviously it’s fine if you don’t want to use this but I would be curious to hear why. As it seems you are quite busy with all of this, I would think it would be much more convenient to use a powerful framework that already exists instead of spending days creating your own. But I’m not you. What do you think?

12:12 - but Venus DOES spin in another direction than other planets in our solar system.

Physicists dont claim any of those things...what you're describing is the "woo woo" that results from secondary sources misunderstanding the primary claims of the field. E.g. Einstein was always cautioning against anyone thinking that physics is an objective description of the universe. Also, Anyone saying that photons are making decisions is straight up misunderstanding the dual slit experiment.

Tribotex.

Get a dog....

Too new...get the best used 97-98 jeep grand cherokee....and restore and keep it running....low tech...oldrr Buicks are FAR SUPERIOR to amy car on THE road...cheers

Not a bad theory!