Zigzag Structure | Corrective Structures | Elliott Wave Structure: Rules, Fibonacci Relationship

[@SebastianLecona]

great video! corrective waves have liquified my brain and now they makee a loot moore sense!

[@pragatmudra8372]

Awesome video, it's helping me, thx buddy, plz keep posting.....

[@bipinmakwana3597]

Sir, I would glad to clarify what each of combined corrections forms 9, 15 and 23 swings and to label each of swing as w, x and y. If possible, could you please make video

[@riyas2khan]

14:22 does it meet the fibonacci relation? ((b)) seems not retraced atleast 50% of wave((a)). can you pls clarify

[@ElliottWaveForecast]

Hi. There's no absolute rule that wave ((b)) must retrace at least 50% of wave ((a)). What's more important is to get confirmation that wave ((a)) has ended. We could look for trend line channel for the confirmation that a new cycle has started

[@julesbar3545]

Do u have a daily analysis for forex etc?

[@ronypazavinoamhatuka6508]

I must say that I love Your explanation approach .Thank you by the way..what's your name?

[@ElliottWaveForecast]

Start 14-Day Trial: bit.ly/1nOKJec

[@xdbgtl]

Im ur fans

[@checkmate3355]

Can B wave also retrace to even 95% of Wave A? Is it still valid and considered as Zig Zag?

[@ElliottWaveForecast]

Yes, as long as it doesn't break below beginning of A. When it's very deep retracement, sometimes it can become a Flat ABC structure (3-3-5)

[@opponentx7539]

BRAVISSIMI

[@omaralikiani2818]

Can the Wave C in a zigzag target the 261.8% in rare cases?

[@marioshalongo9943]

I also thought about it