Embedded Schedules in Revit Tutorial

[@junaugalpalipao9613]

Thank You Sir for this great Tutorial, It helps a lot. God Bless

[@petsandpaws8906]

As usual I found this to be a very informative video. Great stuff

[@wesleyzuala2320]

thanks to you, i am what i am today.. thanks a lot.. keet it up

[@leonardo-tc7ou]

thanks for your videos!

[@Engineer-Samibress]

Thanks for your time nice explanation 😊

[@HaoXu-q8z]

Thank you for your video. A question plz does the embedded elements can be scheduled if they are in a different link? Say if we want to create a room schedule in the architecture model and that room schedule contains furniture from the interior model?

[@larryweissenburger]

I'm using Revit 2025.2 and I do not have the embedded schedule tab. Is there a setting I need to turn on to see embedded schedules?

[@gusfe7547]

Do you know how to export in excel this type of embedded schedules? It's never work for me

[@bushrazahra2569]

Thank u for everything.. can u make a video about how to make a custom door handle?!

[@trevorbelmont4633]

Embedded schedules started in which Revit version?

[@HerbHalstead]

filtering those rooms out by number seems less than a robust way to remove those rooms Is there a way to filter them out by furniture count?

[@tictoon]

I would create a new parameter that was a yes/no box for inclusion in the schedule instead of filtering. The most robust way would be to have a shared parameter from the room family and then use that to filter.

[@HerbHalstead]

@@tictoon the yes/no thing is not as robust because it would require setting/un-setting it for every room. The best solution would be an intelligent way to check for NO furniture instances in a room and filter out that way, because new rooms with no furniture or room with furniture later removed would self-filter.

[@tictoon]

@@HerbHalstead Correct, I just think that the work to implement a solution would outpace the ease of the yes/no solution. And I don't mean it to be robust, but just a quick and dirty way to get the job done. Agreed with your filtering idea, just seems complex.