Emergency medicine for our climate fever | Kelly Wanser

As we recklessly warm the planet by pumping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, some industrial emissions also produce particles that reflect sunshine back into space, putting a check on global warming that we're only starting to understand. Climate activist Kelly Wanser asks: Can we engineer ways to harness this effect and further reduce warming? Learn more about the promises and risks of "cloud brightening" -- and how it could help restore our climate to health.
Get TED Talks recommended just for you! Learn more at www.ted.com/signup.
The TED Talks channel features the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes (or less). Look for talks on Technology, Entertainment and Design -- plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. You're welcome to link to or embed these videos, forward them to others and share these ideas with people you know. For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request here: media-requests.ted.com/
Follow TED on Twitter: / tedtalks
Like TED on Facebook: / ted
Subscribe to our channel: / ted

[@nivedhithaselvakumaran9429]

Heartening to see that there is some hope.. even if it's little. Hopefully in the next decade more people would wake up to this

[@davec8473]

Don't scroll down, it's not worth it

[@ChaseFawcett]

Its true😥😥

[@bluellamaslearnbeyondthele2456]

How about you look up Tony Heller?

[@Pr0jectFM]

Oh God. I wish I listened to this

[@YourFatherVEVO]

Reading ted comments are about as fun as passing a kidney stone

[@skylerashe]

Crazy how people just cant fathom the future if we keep going the way we are. Listen the the people that are smarter to you... thats the only thing that makes humans special haha. Like if any of these climate change doubters were born into a society with no language you would be nothing but a naked ape. Learn to embrace the gift of knowledge and realize that the tech we have today is the accumulation of all of human histories prior knowledge combined. No one can learn these things on their own and no one got where they are today without building upon everyone before them.

[@titaniastinkerings]

I guess my main question is when will they give us the information on potential hazards of this and how to prevent them? I'm mostly worried that we're gonna lace the clouds with so many chemicals and minerals that its going to be even more unsafe to drink any natural water. We have filters in place for ours, but many countries don't, and wild animals certainly don't. And what kind of effect would the chemical changes have on the plants being watered by the rain? And on the ocean and its many life forms? I like the idea, but too few words were spoken on the potential dangers of it.

[@FadyAnwar]

When people will stop using the word theoretical as if it means hypothetical?

[@hitoshiyamauchi]

I see the possibility. But I prefer to work on the cause, not symptoms. If the CO2 (or any other emitted gas) is the problem, I prefer to handle CO2. If I have a fever by virus, just suppressing the fever without handling the virus, this sounds like a short term solution for me. I really want to work on the cause and real cure. I see this is one option, but I don't see this as the final solution.Still I thank to a nice talk.

[@iancox7874]

Hitoshi Yamauchi exactly! The solution lies hidden within the cause

[@hamzasaleh8570]

Why not both? I think using both of these takes would give us better results

[@MrsPikagirl]

You're absolutely right ! And that's what she also thinks and says. This could be a temporary "solution" but not a real and definitive one, and we really need to work on CO2 emissions. She also says that this technique could be used only a few times so it isn't a real solution that's gonna save us all, and she doesn't want anybody to rely on this solution. At first I thought, "is this really where we are now ? Finding those kind of solutions to save ourselves while we should work on the causes ?" and was really relieved at the end of the video when she said it wasn't the miraculous solution !

[@batrachian149]

If you're sick and the symptoms are approaching lethality and it would be easier to manage symptoms than address the cause, it is best to - at least for now - address the symptoms so you don't die.

[@jhrobbins7084]

Hitoshi Yamauchi gotta address the symptoms first in the case of greenhouse gasses... temps will keep rising even if we get rid of all emissions for 15 years or something. Gotta fight the positive feedback loops by interventions like this

[@loveelies6979]

How she sighs deeply says enough 🌎

[@heathermcrobie3110]

I was really hoping for a talk on this

[@ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869]

It's a redeaux of "scientific" theory to fight the Ice Age in the 70s.

[@Warnerchild]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/ip7OaKF3q9WAjrM

[@zhubajie6940]

Sulfates also don't just make clouds they also cause acid rain.

[@Hyper5nic]

Exactly, and this kind of acid rain pours on our hottest earthlike planet around the sun, Venus.

[@macareuxmoine]

I’m afraid the salt option might be equally problematic 🤔

[@jacobopstad5483]

I'm always amazed by how a lot of the most interesting solutions are based on simple ideas. The earth is getting too hot: let's reflect sunlight! Wouldn't it be possible to do that without using carbon or other harmful particulates?

[@qman1434]

Carbon is not a harmful molecule. It is the basis for all life forms on Earth. For instance, planting trees, they need more carbon dioxide because it is the very breath of the tree and all other plants on Earth. More carbon dioxide equals more vegetation. More vegetation equals more food and more oxygen. The United States right now has cleaner air and cleaner water than it as in decades. The hoax is about changing our system of government and will bankrupt our country leaving us to the mercy of China, Russia, Iran and North Korea to name a few. They have no mercy for you. They call you "Useful Idiots"! I call you traitors and dumbasses!

[@kirstinstrand6292]

@@qman1434 maybe you should research Methane Gases that is LETHAL and will kill everyone, Mr Know it all.

[@WhichDoctor1]

@@qman1434 Carbon is absolutely not a harmful molecule. It does however trap heat energy. China is the worlds biggest investor in renewable energy. China has installed more than half of the worlds solar panels on Chinese soil since 2017. They are the leaders in this new technology. They might well call the USA dumbasses, or something similar, but its only because you are handing them the future of energy production on a silver platter while clinging onto coal like a moldy old safety blanket.

[@jacobopstad5483]

@@WhichDoctor1 Carbon can be both a beneficial and harmful molecule, depending on the form it comes in. Yes, carbon is present in all living things on earth and yes, we need it. The same can be said for water. We can drink water or we can drown in it. We can consume carbon or we can be suffocated by it.

[@WhichDoctor1]

@@jacobopstad5483 Yes but the form literally everyone is talking about in this discussion is Co2 in the atmosphere, carbon is simply used as a shorthand for Co2 in this debate. Although having said that I was infact wrong, as Co2 in the atmosphere dissolves into the oceans causing them to become more acid and less hospitable to many forms of sea life, in witch case it is directly harmful.

[@qman1434]

Teflon on your pots and pans is great!

[@andrzejkapera1130]

Protect the forests !

[@MichaelAPoynter]

The solar winds are already seeding the atmosphere and we're still warming. We need to cut CO2 and methane--stat.

[@jamessewell9655]

This was a fantastic and balanced debate including moral hazard ethics. Great TED talk!

[@leveljoe]

It was not a debate. TED talks never are. What it is, is fear mongering for job security....

[@phant0]

It's reassuring and terrifying at the same time. Reassuring because we have ways to buy more time. But terrifying because I feel like if these measures work governments will use this as an excuse to no longer take carbon emissions seriously.

[@macareuxmoine]

Don’t want to be a buzz kill here, but what about salty or sulphuric rain resulting from these aerosols?

[@maryazaki255]

Time to make big changes!!!

[@batrachian149]

@@Exodus26.13Pi *tinfoil intensifies*

[@veritasluxmea80]

I would like to see a chart that goes back further than the 80's so we can see the whole picture. You can't say definitively until you look at the entire earth climate history (which we have in ice cores)!

[@donnashookedcreationsxoxo635]

This and other things that have been suggested could help if they ever get implemented

[@TimothyHall13]

Our grand conceit will be our ruin.

[@michaborski7383]

fascinating

[@ShaneHummus]

Very useful video. You see, one of the best investments we could have is our health. Health is wealth my brothers and sisters. Cheers to everyone.

[@paulomolina4723]

@Wake Up you are a weirdo

[@divyamurugesan5557]

Why only marine clouds?

[@nicolaiecostel]

So acid rain is the solution ?

[@cyberspaceDv8]

Imagine the effect on forests!

[@RalphDratman]

I feel like I could go crazy in this world

[@gammaraygem]

you´d fit right in !

[@melissabooth325]

This woman is saying that we should RESEARCH marine cloud brightening so that we understand all the risks. She is urging us to learn the science (microphysics, cloud chemistry, meteorological effects, biologic and ecological consequences, etc.) so that the world will have the needed information to do an INFORMED cost-benefit analysis and decide whether or not this climate intervention is a good idea. She is not advocating to use this technology in this TED talk. She's saying that we need to invest in studying our options so we can make good choices for ourselves and future generations. If we do not collect this information, desperate policymakers in the future will likely wield these tools without any knowledge of the consequences. It is imperative that we gather data about all possible solutions right now. That data empowers us to select the best alternatives for Earth and human well-being and discard ideas that we learn are too risky. If we don't do the studies, we won't have the information to make good choices.

[@MaJoRMJR]

We need action today, we have solutions today, it needs investment, this is a pipe dream that may never happen and if it does, might not work. I'd rather invest in the solutions we know do work.

[@moonstuff8582]

Go crowdfund this!

[@qman1434]

CFCs will make you more comfortable in your car!

[@steveco1800]

A carbon tax could fund the marine brightening ships. If Governments don't make it possible to run as a business it won't happen.

[@googlenutzer8768]

Nothing there could go wrong....

[@derbersdiscoveries5938]

We can see how they manipulate the upper and lower atmosphere.

[@stabinojablonski]

this comment section is pain

[@dangelobenjamin]

Scary tbh

[@ericvanoppens3179]

The real problem is never mentioned. Word population growth.

[@Missemilie97]

True, but what can you REALLY do about that? Now a days you need to think about the ethical aspect of every decision

[@lexon196]

@@Missemilie97 promote abortion

[@MindlessTube]

@@Missemilie97 More death penalties less welfare.

[@kugreymon]

Changes in the albedo through clouds (the reflectivity she mentioned) does not necessarily help. Cloud themselves trap a lot more heat than co2. Increasing reflectivity reduce energy coming in, yes, but think of global warming as traffic jam, you can reduce the amount of people coming in, and it would help, but if the blockade exist still, it is still going to be jammed for a long while. She graphed 2 worlds, but she failed to mention the 3rd, one that cool through the first half of the century, and rapidly burn up in the second half. That is when the heat trapped outweigh the heat reflected. And it is one of those tipping point that literally does not turn back. Example? Venus

[@jhrobbins7084]

kugreymon it’s all about cloud location

[@kugreymon]

Jonathan Robbins in general, I think clouds are mostly over the oceans, given thats where most of the evaporation is coming from, and that is why they are 0.2 out of 0.3 of the Earth Albedo. Where they are doesnt matter as much as how much of them there are most of the time. (Exception exist only for clouds over the poles, those doesnt increase albedo significantly) In other words, where they are dont really matters, it is how much aerosols you put in and how that can affect the atmosphere.

[@Thebetteryoutalkshow]

Wow

[@johnnovell2477]

So these"clouds" that look like stripes in the sky and can be watched coming from the aircraft that spray it is really coming from ship's in the ocean.........hmmmm

[@UncleRayRayGarageEmporium]

It is from both. Combustion produces water vapor, CO2, CO, and a few others including sulfur compounds in diesel. This rises in the atmosphere to where the temperature allows for condensation, and poof, a cloud. Like our breath or car exhaust in the winter.

[@JustOneAsbesto]

I really like how she says the cooling effect from particle emissions reflecting sunlight is equal to the heating effect while she simultaneously shows us a graph that says the net effect has been to massively warm the planet. Good job.

[@viktorjaakkola200]

What she means is that the masked cooling (could be up to 1,1C according to her presentation) equals the experienced warming, also 1,1C. This means without the aerosol masking effect we would be 2,2 C warmer. Which is something James Hansen also concluded in his latest report Global warming in the pipeline.

[@the_traveller6994]

Data shows we have passed the point of no return. I'm afraid it's too late to save the planet.

[@leveljoe]

Earth was always doomed. The reset button has been hit several times already and the next one can happen at any time.

[@crazyprayingmantis5596]

The planet will be fine as soon as it gets rid of us.

[@leveljoe]

@@crazyprayingmantis5596 the planet already is "fine", but feel free to do what you wish as long as it only involves you!

[@federicat5383]

Great speech!

[@mihabrilj152]

ok lets go make pompei

[@mmmk1616]

Good talk, I think she is very thoughtful and cautious which is good. On a side note, her outfit is fantastic! That's how to dress for a TED talk!

[@gammaraygem]

als me haar maar goed zit...

[@mmmk1616]

@@gammaraygem Say what?

[@gammaraygem]

@@mmmk1616 human stupidity 2.0

[@lockergremlin]

I'm confused, the factories and ship's pollution are cooling the planet? Nothing to do with the ozone layer being destroyed? Sorry if I'm being stupid but this seems to go against everything I know about pollution 😆

[@willpattie581]

Hezza although chemicals like H2SO4 (sulfate) can be bad for health and can cause acid rain, if they’re emitted high enough in the atmosphere, they reflect a lot of sunlight and can cool the earths temperature. H2SO4 is bad in some ways, but potentially very good for controlling the average global temperature

[@20alphabet]

You know nothing about pollution, and that's the way they likes it.

[@TheLivirus]

This type of research will probably have no problem getting funded. Petroleum industries will throw money at it to divert discussion from renewable energy towards damage control while looking virtuous.

[@lazy_lad_]

👍👍

[@qman1434]

They have no idea if human intervention can do anything.

[@CristalcatXP]

So do you think we should just do nothing?

[@markvietti]

its stupid there will be nuclear war before this kills us

[@AliHSyed]

British Weather Widening

[@Sheeshening]

Let's get real, either we come up with a really good new technological solution or we're getting the full blown effects. China, India and drum roll Africa will want to increase their living standards dramatically. White world has just 760m people, about twice as many as Africa added in just the last 10 years, even if they all vanished tomorrow, the catastrophe would be postponed by maybe 50 years.

[@docholiday6421]

What about air planes they put so much , when 9/11 happen and the planes were stopped from flying the air was tested and was much cleaner..

[@Fedgery007]

Just read an article that talked about an asteroid collision in space millions of years ago that caused an ice age on earth. Tell me again how much we actually know about what contributes to the climate on earth?

[@robertog8008]

Jeffrey B I bet what happened with the asteroid was the same process as the pinotubo explosion bit at a larger scale and instead of lasting 2 years it lasted centuries So we do know (roughly) what contributes and what doesn’t to climate change The problem here (i think) is that we don’t know how it will affect the rest( pollution, impact on storms and clouds, etc) so we can’t yet deploy such new tech

[@lijumnochi8203]

Oh John. 😂😂😂😂😂

[@qman1434]

Talcum powder is safe!

[@joewilder]

I feel hopeful. Perhaps out climate problems will be the impetus to learn how to truly control our climate. We might come out of it with ways to make many more parts of the world fertile or livable in other ways.

[@leveljoe]

And just who do you trust to be in charge of the climate of the Earth?

[@timoffreethought580]

Too many people. Way too fucken many. BUT NOT FOR LONG !

[@Wegnerrobert2]

Why the dislikes?

[@danglinglong2941]

It looks like a lot of the conspiracy theorists talking about chemtrails were actually conspiracy Analysts 🤔

[@welkinator]

So... the ships moved several hundreds of miles while the clouds remained stationary above them as the ship's exhaust emissions rose up to and through the layer of clouds so we can see these streaks on top. hmmmmmnnnnn

[@traytonshelton6928]

If you looked at planes doing this you would see the same results. They move faster than the clouds, and their clouds even move and stay behind them.

[@davec8473]

When I was about 12 I learnt about and understood climate change. It blows my mind that there so many people who deny it.

[@eyeofhorus4387]

Dave C Do you understand that “climate change” is an umbrella term? That term specifies nothing so that might be a reason why people deny it. Also the fact that alarmism is the entire talk of the “climate”. In 2009 Al Gore released a documentary and talked about “climate change” and his overall idea was that the world would end by 2019. Yeah sure. Now the worlds ending in 12 years? Okay bub. Another thing is just because you “learned” about something at school when you were 12 doesn’t mean it’s true or correct. The fact of the matter is the world has warming and cooling periods. Which is a fact. Another fact is that we do effect the environment, no one denies that, people deny the ridiculous claims climate activists propose.

[@LakierosJordy]

@@eyeofhorus4387 "the world has cooling and warming periods" Perhaps in cartoon form you will grasp just how out of the norm the current situation is: xkcd.com/1732/

[@MichaelLloyd]

"learnt"? You should have spent more time studying spelling

[@davec8473]

@Belial 32 :)

[@davec8473]

@Iann Cuyun I remember doing climate change in a Geography class about 15/20 years ago. The topic was 'Are humans having an impact on climate change?' and it's funny because it was made into a debate in class. We were provided with lots of data and had to make our own mind up. I remember that based on the date we concluded that yes the world warms and cools over long periods of time to much higher and lower temperatures we've seen in our lifetimes but the recent rate of change is unprecedented. Check out the illustration above that Jordy shared for a great visualisation of this.

[@dropkollecter6727]

Are we going to die?

[@Hyper5nic]

Eventually, yes!

[@BV-fr8bf]

Please explain how we will scrub the sulfur from the 22 currently active volcanos? Also, PLEASE go fix India AND China first for their vast pollution emissions including sulfur, before lecturing us in English (European & American audiences) about the problem. Ship based emissions are a fraction of the coal emissions (again, Inda and china.)

[@chetthebee1322]

They won't because China will stop pumping their money and students into American universities.

[@coreyfreedom9859]

Dont forget alot of there emissions are from making the crap the western world buys

[@phillipii4709]

India just recently started to emit CO2. Still far less than the US. West is doing this to earth since 150 years what India is doing for 5-6 years. But still China and India are working unlike the Americans.

[@chetthebee1322]

@@phillipii4709 Repeat after me: China pollution good, American pollution bad.

[@BV-fr8bf]

@@phillipii4709 US CO2: * U.S. net emissions declined 12 percent from 2005 to 2017 due to a range of market- and policy-related factors. Electric power sector emissions fell 27 percent as a result of a shift from coal to natural gas, increased use of renewable energy, and a leveling of electricity demand.* www.c2es.org/content/u-s-emissions/

[@jerrychuskysayrain]

First of all, aerosols have broken our ozone layer that is why aerosols are banned in most industries and around the world. 0:53 she said greenhouse gases trap heat over long periods of time, and then 4:44 she wants us to put more of this heat-trapping gases in our atmosphere? What happens when you put something that is heating up, by giving it more of those the same thing that causes the heating? did not finish the video and she has already lost me. This is a crisis, use the more current images of studies for your presentation, not 2007, please.

[@tmarti69]

One thing to also consider is a while you’re at it strategy. Use planes boats to emit sulfur at GPS locations to protect the ice caps. This is water that cannot return for thousands of years, we will also lower global warming at the same time. We will get acid rain but less in our cities corroding structures. A while you are at it strategy will reduce the cost part of the next decades solutions. There is not a high risk in this. It is what has protected us for the beginning of deforestation of north America and Europe and carbon emissions since the industrial age.

[@killua4717]

good idea but mirrors and colleters at an L-Point are better in my opinnion

[@2828chaka]

Killua Please do the math to figure out the size of the mirror. And don't forget to include the ecological impact of sending it to low earth orbit, then to a Lagrange point.

[@killua4717]

@@2828chaka oky first off all you dont produce them on eahrt,you produce them in space. Also wihle you building them you can build a solar power Satellit to produce Clean energy in the GW area,all of that would only cost 600 billion whit a falcon heavy. So do the maht again but this time includ all the benefits

[@2828chaka]

Killua You're right, I totally forgot about the mirror and hydrogen factories we have on the moon! Now let's do the math to figure out the size of the mirror please.

[@killua4717]

@@2828chaka i know that you dont build on mirror and if i remeber the numbers correctly it schould have an diameter of 1000-1500 km if you build only 1. Also you would only get the raw ressurces from the moon or nearby astroids the manufacturing processes would be happening in orbit. The reason why i see this as more efficient than dumping arosols in the atmosphere is that it it gets more efficient over time and is a logical steep in our evolution with or without climate change(i am not a clima sceptic). Ps. Just a qustion but what is your field of work, i dont mean this offensive

[@2828chaka]

Killua Yes. Or as square km, around 1.500.000. An area roughly the size of Greenland or half the USA. Then you'll need the hardware and fuel to put everything in place (and keep it there). All of this in less than 50 years. And with some technologies we don't have yet.

[@divyamurugesan5557]

I dont know why. But this talk dint impress me like other TED talks. Problem is real. The Solution offered is not real. May be I am wrong. Solving the root cause will be better.

[@jhrobbins7084]

Divya Murugesan even if 100% of all co2 emissions stopped, the planet would continue warming for like 15 years cuz of positive feedback loops. This video details a way that could be a good way to control those feedback loops

[@divyamurugesan5557]

@@jhrobbins7084 👍☺️

[@Warnerchild]

How ironic that chemtrails could finally save us

[@dcdevera7365]

not trying to be immature but she kind of looks like the bounty hunter that tries to hunt Anakin and obi wan kenobi

[@thetoad7367]

Bobba fett?

[@dcdevera7365]

Liam Wood zam wessell

[@gurudra]

One thing is certain : either mankind has to die or mankind has to change )

[@reallife7375]

You know nothing my dear

[@reallife7375]

@Lost Hero yeah those dam oceans are consuming all the land

[@qman1434]

@your father Thank you for the advice. I am not "normal". Thanks Dad!

[@kirstinstrand6292]

Just the low IQ son.

[@qman1434]

@@kirstinstrand6292 List the greenhouse gasses by concentration and volatility. I can wait.

[@watmosphere]

Chemtrails confirmed.

[@mihabrilj152]

is fast climet change a scam?

[@shaunrankin8764]

The pilots know how much 🙈

[@GuitarZombie]

Translation........We have no clue about our effect on the climate

[@ChaseFawcett]

No translation we know we are having an effect and it's negative but were not sure what were doing exactly so we are still test things

[@GuitarZombie]

@@ChaseFawcett We can probably do better.

[@leveljoe]

@@ChaseFawcett to what degree?

[@bostonmason2093]

We've always dreaded the day when we had to hear a lecture on saving our atmosphere ,in a human caused atmospheric catastrophe..... AIN'T IT?

[@indoorgangster]

She'll get canceled..

[@brawndo8726]

I'll say this here in hopes someone sees it: Air travel should be banned at night in order to disperse aerosols during the day when we benefit from the reflectivity.

[@danathrower2680]

Stop consuming! Breath in the air!

[@dangelobenjamin]

Some of these comments are not only insane but are genuinely terrifying. KZbin comments are truly the fringes of modern society.

[@davec8473]

I agree. It's easy to misunderstand them as a cross section of society but it's important to remember this is just a vocal minority. Sometimes I click on one of their profiles and then see they liked a video about bigfoot and feel a little relieved.

[@eyeofhorus4387]

dangelobenjamin Yeah I don’t know about that one pal. If you’re terrified about different opinions on a political topic that has evidence as well then you should probably join the military to toughen up.

[@bluellamaslearnbeyondthele2456]

You poor thing.

[@spirgtudsrubec7776]

Why don't you just leave well enough alone.

[@Fedgery007]

We’re all going to die in 12 years! 🙄😜🤪

[@MikeLOldham]

No one says that pansy. LOL

[@dswagler]

@@MikeLOldham AOC did, you little sissy. Https://news.yahoo.com/ocasio-cortez-world-going-end-150517060.html

[@TheNewMaxico]

More like 30 tbh

[@Fedgery007]

Belial Agreed! My comment was sarcastic. Every global Warmer says oh we only have 10 years! Then someone else says 20. Then 50.

[@thetoad7367]

Jeffrey B bollocks. They’ve said that for years. I’m 30. Bet I’ll come back here in 30 years to say hello to you again.

[@nicosoldevilla5481]

Trees love CO2, it is essential for their diet

[@20alphabet]

That's why they want to eliminate Co2, to kill all vegetation. Five generations later scientists will say "Eliminate Co2? What were they thinking!"

[@markvietti]

your about as smart as a tree too

[@20alphabet]

@@markvietti But you aren't.

[@nicosoldevilla5481]

@@markvietti yes, thank you for being such a kind person

[@jimmypage3183]

When my home air conditioner broke i moved the refrigerator into living room with both doors wide open. It didnt work at all. I tried a fan to but it didnt work either. What? Dumb video needs dumb comments🙃

[@jimmypage3183]

@@Cheeze777 i really did do that with a refrigerator. The look on my girfriends face was priceless!!

[@MJ-jq4kc]

WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE ANYWAY GUYS :D

[@WoW12889]

How??

[@thetoad7367]

Raja Touseef yes

[@michaborski7383]

Trump might not agree :D :D

[@simplerider3159]

Perfect solution for climate activists to preach at us while keeping their iphones shipped by boat

[@diamondfn9600]

Hello man first one to comment

[@kelvinbel8910]

I witness planes spraying North Georgia daily which disperse and it's soon overcast. Who is spraying? Who is funding this program? What are we breathing? Sept 23 2019

[@tristajames7821]

Stop lying

[@ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869]

Dunning-Krueger affect is a bothersome thing to deal with. This silly girl doesn't even know that cooler air will increase hurricane intensity. Why isn't Pinituobo factored on Mann's hockey stick?

[@AkinolaEmmanuel]

where's the silly girl?

[@ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869]

@@AkinolaEmmanuel the presenter. Passing off these ideas from the 1970s to fight the coming ice age like it's some revolutionary new idea. That's 17 minutes of my life I won't get back.

[@estoyaqui5386]

so we need blonde couds?

[@qman1434]

The most intelligent thing you have said is that science is limited. That could have saved us all 14 minutes and 48 seconds.

[@themeddle2449]

omg, I’m thirst to somethinggg

[@alg3221]

she wants to look and sound like a scientist but sounds like a cheap infomercial presenter

[@qman1434]

Don't worry, cigarettes are not harmful!

[@qman1434]

Did you ever notice that the side effects always include diarrhea AND constipation? That's a clue.

[@YourFatherVEVO]

next time try leaving one comment like a normal person

[@PineappleGrenade84]

Let’s go back to boats or maybe everyone should stay in their own countries no more traveling and trading goods 🤣🤣🤣

[@Juiczey]

How does she know those trails are not just chemtrails?

[@revspikejonez]

Because there would be physical evidence, dipshit

[@og_scarah6847]

If you look at stats from thousands of years ago, you'll see that the climate has BEEN CHANGING FOR A WHILE. Meaning it's gone up and down. It has varied. This is not news. Everyone should respect the place we all call home and do their part to help keep it healthy. But this isn't something new and urgent. The earth can take care of itself. We just do our own little share

[@og_scarah6847]

Lost Hero I'm just saying. I did research on it and I really don't see a big deal. I think there are bigger concerns we should focus on

[@og_scarah6847]

Lost Hero and all the things I'm hearing have "could" "simulation" "potential" "possibilities" "suggest" in front of them. like??

[@qman1434]

Including poor Obama who just bought at Oceanfront mansion!

[@tristajames7821]

Stop lying.

[@thebackchannel1641]

She even sounds gullible.

[@mikehoncho3015]

Scam artists these days I swear

[@j0epa51]

2:01 sepia filter

[@mikehoncho3015]

jspotj the ole Instagram intern that just graduated from a third tier college with a marketing degree making it really count hahahaha