Endeavor CRJ9 performs emergency landing at Kennedy Airport. Loss of nose wheel steering. Real ATC

  Рет қаралды 24,601

You can see ATC

You can see ATC

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 86
@walterappling6230
@walterappling6230 Жыл бұрын
And the actual available landing length for 31L remains a closely guarded secret.
@AEMoreira81
@AEMoreira81 Жыл бұрын
Displaced threshold means about 10,500 feet. The threshold is past 22R/4L.
@federalburrito
@federalburrito Жыл бұрын
The controller said. Only displaced threshold was closed. So no difference.
@Tygreton87
@Tygreton87 Жыл бұрын
Hahahahah totally. The pilot asked that like, 5 times? 😆
@amb865
@amb865 Жыл бұрын
That was an interesting one. Pilot was super-clear and didn’t hesitate to ask when he needed ATC to repeat something
@RLTtizME
@RLTtizME Жыл бұрын
Could you repeat that?
@gravity69100
@gravity69100 Жыл бұрын
nothing like declaring an emergency, and then having the controller ask you 30 seconds later if you’re going to declare an emergency
@jamescollier3
@jamescollier3 Жыл бұрын
it used to be fuel and souls a few times. once per controller
@sylviaelse5086
@sylviaelse5086 Жыл бұрын
Yes - if he'd said MAY-DAY MAY-DAY MAY-DAY there would have been no confusion, though note my comment about PAN-PAN.
@wizerdjuice9589
@wizerdjuice9589 Жыл бұрын
Well done by the crew and ATC.
@RLTtizME
@RLTtizME Жыл бұрын
@@sylviaelse5086 No. You just made that up. There is no factual proof of that.
@MrRadarrat
@MrRadarrat Жыл бұрын
Having been a controller what you don't hear are the other 30 aircraft he's talking to, the coordination going on its nowhere as neat and tidey as these clips
@Joe-Guybee
@Joe-Guybee Жыл бұрын
The length of 31L must be classified.
@t.p.mckenna
@t.p.mckenna Жыл бұрын
'Er, excuse me, sir ... that information is on a strictly need-to-know basis. What is your need to know? Please advise.'
@ailivac
@ailivac Жыл бұрын
"You're 10 miles from MEALS" But we're hungry now!!
@t.p.mckenna
@t.p.mckenna Жыл бұрын
Unfortunately this is one of those 'aaarghhhh!!!' exchanges when you just want to scream out and say, 'oh, for pity's sake ... someone!! ... Please!!! Just give the man some GODDAM yardage!!'
@Rosarium2007
@Rosarium2007 Жыл бұрын
2:10 - sounds like tower repeated amount of fuel back wrong and then later asks about fuel again, only in time.
@Supernova_sapiens
@Supernova_sapiens Жыл бұрын
Doesn't the Kennedy Approach controller sound like the folksy controller from Die Hard 2?
@MattyEngland
@MattyEngland Жыл бұрын
"We're gonna need tugging off on arrival
@blockbertus
@blockbertus Жыл бұрын
"Could you take the highspeed exit with your inop nose wheel steering?!" Both ATCs were kinda all over the place here.
@amb865
@amb865 Жыл бұрын
Could you imagine the PA announcement? “All right - once we land, I need all passengers to unbuckle, run to the right side and leannnnn - maybe we’ll make the high speed exit.”
@RLTtizME
@RLTtizME Жыл бұрын
I think the commenters missed your mirthful innuendo.
@amb865
@amb865 Жыл бұрын
@@RLTtizME or chose to ignore it!
@RLTtizME
@RLTtizME Жыл бұрын
@@amb865 Humorless twits. Stiffs.
@chrisschack9716
@chrisschack9716 Жыл бұрын
Heading 090 looks correct to me, possibly they missed one of the previous turns. Judging this from JFK's runways and the angle the later heading 150 makes.
@josephroberts6865
@josephroberts6865 Жыл бұрын
I agree. Magnetic headings are much different than true headings or grid headings. The isogonic lines of variation on a VFR Sectional show the difference from true course to magnetic course (or heading after adjusting for compass deviation) that result in a significant shift with east isogonic variation being subtracted from true course and west isogonic variation being added.
@elainecolling6883
@elainecolling6883 Жыл бұрын
THESE PILOTS HAVE A GREAT RESPONSIBLITY TO MAKE SURE ALL PEOPLE COME TO SAFETY GIVE SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS TO THEM THEY GO THROUGH MANY HOURS OF TRAINING WORKING TOGETHER IS VERY SERIOUS TO ACQUIRE A SAFE LANDING🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊❤️❤️🙏🙏
@brmam1385
@brmam1385 Жыл бұрын
It’s always astonishing to me how clear & calm pilots sound when there’s big trouble going on.👍♥
@jillcrowe2626
@jillcrowe2626 Жыл бұрын
These men and women are cut from a different cloth than you and me.
@buckmurdock2500
@buckmurdock2500 Жыл бұрын
nose wheel steering is not exactly a life threatening situation.
@teamscrew
@teamscrew Жыл бұрын
I’m curious how they would know they have an inoperable nose wheel while they’re in the air?
@golfkid333
@golfkid333 Жыл бұрын
Me too
@rdspam
@rdspam Жыл бұрын
My first thought reading the summary/intro. I assume they got a warning/alert - slow hydraulic leak that took time to trigger a sensor?
@AviateNavigate671
@AviateNavigate671 Жыл бұрын
CRJ driver here! It’s not so much that the Control Unit knows that the NW Steering is inop, rather it senses an issue with some part of the aircraft that would cause the NW steering to become inop. So an issue with the hydraulic 3 system, the centering cam for the nose wheel (which is the device that keeps it centered while the NW is retracting), or even an issue with the Proximity Sensing Electronic Unit (PSEU; monitors the position of the landing gear) could all trigger a STEER INOP caution message
@golfkid333
@golfkid333 Жыл бұрын
@@AviateNavigate671 awesome! thank you!
@pk7549
@pk7549 Жыл бұрын
NWS control unit failed, that's all.
@atomicgiraffe250
@atomicgiraffe250 Жыл бұрын
Forgive my ignorance... why does inoperate nose steering require an immediate return the airport? Couldn't they continue onto their destination and deal with it there, presumably with a much lighter fuel load?
@saxmanb777
@saxmanb777 Жыл бұрын
Long runway, familiar airport, loss of hydraulic pressure…. Just better to get on the ground and not go to destination.
@UnshavenStatue
@UnshavenStatue Жыл бұрын
it's about length of runway, quality of emergency response on the ground, and to a lesser extent, maintenance. jfk surely has longer runways than laguardia or norfolk, and probably better emergency trucks than norfolk too. jfk is also likely a maintenace base for endeavour, but even without the maintenance factor, jfk or newark were clear best choices to handle a no-steering emergency and possible runway excursion.
@yooein
@yooein Жыл бұрын
​@@UnshavenStatuealso you better have any passengers at an airport where you can put them on another plane than some random other airport.
@luv2fly452
@luv2fly452 Жыл бұрын
It doesn't most of the time. But they probably talked to maintenance and flight control and the company determined it would be better to return to JFK. They probably had a spare aircraft at JFK which could make for an easy swap of aircraft.
@johnburgess2084
@johnburgess2084 Жыл бұрын
Knowing nothing about the CRJ, if the failure is due to a hydraulic problem, perhaps the problem could get worse as the flight continues. Better to land before more things break.
@yooein
@yooein Жыл бұрын
JFK was surprisingly helpful. Could have been nicer, but they were extremely nice for JFK
@kghjgjgjrfrty
@kghjgjgjrfrty Жыл бұрын
I could use a tug and pull
@sylviaelse5086
@sylviaelse5086 Жыл бұрын
"... have a good day". What do you mean? He's already having a bad day.
@holylee30
@holylee30 Жыл бұрын
from now on
@yooein
@yooein Жыл бұрын
may the rest of your day be good after the mess
@theshiningnova
@theshiningnova Жыл бұрын
kinda curious how they know they have inoperable nose wheel half way through their climb. Does in-op nose wheel has any effect on their ability to fly to their destination?
@AEMoreira81
@AEMoreira81 Жыл бұрын
No ability to fly…just a problem on touchdown. The wheel well will have sensors.
@saxmanb777
@saxmanb777 Жыл бұрын
It literally pops up on their screen. NWS inop or something like that.
@t_t5222
@t_t5222 Жыл бұрын
Better and safer for everyone to land at a hub like new york right away. Destination might not have as good of emergency services if something does go wrong and if something as important as nose wheel steering breaks, there's a high chance that more is gonna break soon.
@danielmillard-g4t
@danielmillard-g4t Жыл бұрын
In this scenario it was better to divert to JFK. The procedure for this issue requires the use of the longest runway available. JFK has longer runways than LGA. Both airport are a Base for Endeavor, once the plan lands it will need to be repaired before it can be flown again. Norfolk has contract maintenance available that can do minor repairs and deferments. For this issue though if the plane where to continue to Norfolk and the Plane would be stuck there until Endeavor could send maintenance down with the right parts. Additionally Delta should be able to rebook passengers to their destination from JFK.
@FeNite8
@FeNite8 Жыл бұрын
​@@danielmillard-g4tNorfolk also has a very short runway due to construction
@imaPangolin
@imaPangolin Жыл бұрын
So in a crj you get this typically with a gear disagree on retraction or with a hydraulic system 3 failure. I’ve had it with a mis rigged proximity sensor. Anything with gear in a crj is 200 kts max and 10000. There’s a breaker that can be reset (on the ground) to get the steering back if it’s PSEU (proximity sensor electronic unit) and you can use rudder to take a high speed. Now if it’s a hydraulic system 3 failure that’s different. No steering. Lucky to have the gear down. Hyd 3 is main gear extension with gravity and hyd 2 assist for the backup extension. The request for longest rwy likely means hyd 3 fail as that would be flaps 20 and a higher approach speed. Also 68 pax with 8000 pounds of fuel is close to max landing weight. The whole runway length discussion is amateur hour. They have JFK charts. Their ACARS landing data will have the lengths as well. Even with flaps 20 and increased landing distance for no inboard brakes and partial ground lift dump any JFK runway works.
@FeNite8
@FeNite8 Жыл бұрын
31L had construction so they were trying to get the actual landing distance...which atc never gave
@pk7549
@pk7549 Жыл бұрын
Then wouldn't they declare a hydraulic failure?
@luv2fly452
@luv2fly452 Жыл бұрын
@@pk7549 It wasn't a hydraulic problem. It was a Nose Wheel Steering Inop problem. Which for all practical purposes is not a big problem.
@albertotognoni4819
@albertotognoni4819 Жыл бұрын
Why they declare Emergency for nearly all sorts of flight control problems
@sylviaelse5086
@sylviaelse5086 Жыл бұрын
We criticise pilots for being unwilling to declare a timely emergency, but in this case, with a nose-wheel inoperative, I'd have thought PAN-PAN was more appropriate.
@amb865
@amb865 Жыл бұрын
Maybe the airline procedures require that they declare emergency in this situation instead of priority handling. JFK ground crew seemed to do a good job of handling once the plane landed
@RLTtizME
@RLTtizME Жыл бұрын
You already posted this. Come on now. Pan pan on outta here.
@sylviaelse5086
@sylviaelse5086 Жыл бұрын
@@RLTtizME This was my first PAN-PAN comment relating to this incident.
@RLTtizME
@RLTtizME Жыл бұрын
@@sylviaelse5086 Mayday...Pan......same issue.
@saxmanb777
@saxmanb777 Жыл бұрын
@@RLTtizMEpan pan is the ICAO standard cooking bacon.
@XPoChangLinX
@XPoChangLinX Жыл бұрын
The pilot and his non-standard phraseology... not great.
Cheerleader Transformation That Left Everyone Speechless! #shorts
00:27
Fabiosa Best Lifehacks
Рет қаралды 16 МЛН
Гениальное изобретение из обычного стаканчика!
00:31
Лютая физика | Олимпиадная физика
Рет қаралды 4,8 МЛН
VIP ACCESS
00:47
Natan por Aí
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
FHP Air31 Full Footage - Best Pit Maneuver of the Year
25:00
SCOOPER
Рет қаралды 793 М.
BOMB THREAT. Republic Airways Embraer 175LR. REAL ATC
8:24
REAL ATC
Рет қаралды 87 М.
Cheerleader Transformation That Left Everyone Speechless! #shorts
00:27
Fabiosa Best Lifehacks
Рет қаралды 16 МЛН