Рет қаралды 4,729
The assumption is that endless punishment is a critical church doctrine. But that goes against the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed which doesn't even mention the doctrine of endless punishment and it most certainly would have if it were critical church doctrine. The church fathers who gave us this creed had different opinions on that subject.
In this presentation I point out the problem with the concept of endless punishment in the Bible. Namely, the Bible never uses the expression "endless" or "without end" in relation to punishment. It uses the Hebrew Olam and the Greek aionios, both of which pertain to a particular age, being that of the age of the Messiah before the reign of the kingdom is handed back to the Father 1. Cor. 15. A finite period of time.
in context with Matt. 25:46 aionios is used to express both life and punishment. A few thoughts on that. First, the Greek word κόλασιν actually means "corrective discipline as opposed to retribution to satisfy the punisher." And endless correction is, well, nonsensical. Look it up in the Rotherham Bible.
Also, the Nicene Constantinopolitan creed, which nearly all Christians consider critical church doctrine says "we believe in the life of the age (world) to come". This referring to location not duration, this is merely when we obtain immortal life in Christ. Also adjectives are commonly juxtaposed contextually in a single sentence. Consider the following sentence:
"Although racism was an enduring part of early American history; God's love for all people is nevertheless an enduring quality of his nature."
So using the popular contextual reasoning for Matt. 25:46 I would have to conclude that unless racism endures forever then God's love doesn't endure forever. And I use that example because enduring actually is the definition of the Latin word eternal (aeternus) in Latin.
Well, see for yourself: www.perseus.tuf...