Energia II (Uragan) Fully Reusable Soviet Rocket Concept

[@ectogaming20]

Those boosters lining up for approach is majestic.

[@stevenwilliams1805]

Absolutely

[@syc8150]

Imagine if the falcon 9 landed like that. Just... like a falcon.

[@ADogNamedStay]

They left out the fact that as soon as the first touched down and deploys chutes, the one behind it will be significantly closer that what it was before.

[@AllThingsCubey]

@@ADogNamedStay Yeah they would stagger the landings a lot more than this

[@andrewkinsey8754]

Gave me chills

[@jeffvader811]

You make the best conceptual-spacecraft renderings on KZbin, you really deserve more subscribers.

[@JustinRK81]

Perhaps you can help answer my question in the comments I stated if you have the time to read it please.... Ty

[@jeffvader811]

@@JustinRK81 This one? "Sure it's reusable here on planet Earth but I'm pretty sure it would be useless in Mars's atmosphere. I'm not a rocket scientist but can anyone in the comments tell me if I'm right...? Just totally a reusable rocket here on Earth with a runway and proper atmosphere correct..?" You're right, the density of the martian atmosphere at ground level (~0.020 kg/m3) is about 61 times less than the density of Earth's atmosphere (~1.225 kg/m3). Since lift is directly proportional to air density (assuming wing area, velocity, and lift coefficient remain the same), winged vehicles on Mars would produce about 61 times less lift than their Earthly counterparts. So yeah, something like this wouldn't be able to fly on Mars unless either the wings were made bigger, or they travelled faster.

[@chrisediger2061]

I think the every time one of these videos comes out. Always very good quality.

[@omfgstfuandgtfo]

Are you Darth Vaders brother? Could you get me his autograph?

[@exoplanets]

Agree

[@КосмонавтикаВидео]

Завораживающе. И это все могло случиться 20 лет назад... Thank you, Hazegrayart!

[@mathiaslist6705]

the landing is even cooler than the one of Falcon Heavy Boosters

[@ВладимирМакарчик-ч1х]

это было уже практически готово в конце 1989 года....Горбачев СССР - всё.... Отличия незначительные от Энергии. Но тут немного не точно. Для Энергии 2 планировалось 6 ускорителей первой ступени. Три пары под углами 120 градусов. Там где "сидел" Буран планировалось еще 2 блока и тогда выводимая на НОО выводилось не 100, а 200 тонн... как то так....

[@praba4036]

Hi kyoko.. Workout mission veg travels

[@ParallelAmmeter]

Who would have thought then that the Union would collapse? For us in Russia, a trip to the stars is a dream that has been taken away from us.

[@cedriceric9730]

Usa kept Russian space program on life support To keep it from the chinese

[@normalhuman9260]

what's it like with mainstream media's constant propaganda? As bad as ours in the states?

[@Herobrine-sj6zm]

I guess there is still a chance roscosmos will reach for the stars again one day

[@rolflandale2565]

They would have been far ahead of the USA space espionage race, this is why the symbolic travel to the Moon & back public was imposed, JFK wanted to unify all governments globally into the space colonization goal, the Soviet was gaining in so many achievements, the USA felt BOTH him & the USSR, *had to go* ...While the USA brought men back from the moon, the Soviet desposable Cosmonauts already burned many times into Earth and Venus, even been secretly to the moon. When the USA sent the first two Voyagers, it's because the USSR may have already orbited Mars, As well Cosmo-nuttz enough to have tried a dive into Jupitor and reach local enough to even witness the moons & rings of Saturn. By the time western espionage snatched the USSR pictures of Venus surface, DEFCON had forsaken them from the Iron Giant bros on earth. By the time private companies were participating in the vertical idiocracy chem-fuel burn to orbit tournaments, ufology sightings of the real tax collected space expense program of USA version anti-gravity technology was lurking, of what even the days of Nazi couldn't allow. By the time you demand links to any of these, further thread messages of this will now self destruct.⚡💥🔥 ♨️

[@SimonBauer7]

@@Herobrine-sj6zm one day. if putin stops wanting to wage wars and cares about the good old space race again.

[@homesbymatt8053]

Wow man, the Energia II would have been a heck of a sight to see! Crying shame it never went any farther than it did. Your visualizations are amazing!

[@tamtamich4]

Energia Buran program was canceled by fall of USSR, Gorbachev destroy USSR.

[@zed7038]

@@tamtamich4 Not just Energia. The MAKS air launched spaceplane, a fleet of Antonov 225s, the Buran shuttle program all got cancelled due to the dissolution. It's really sad.

[@obamagaming-zv4vy]

All because of gorbachev

[@fork9001]

The new USSR (Union of Soviet Sovereign Republics) could’ve made this work sometime in the 2000s, but sadly those damn commie hardliners stormed the Kremlin and Yeltsin restored the Russian Federation whilst Gorbachev was held hostage.

[@michaelreinert987]

This is simply astonishing. To me it is just unbelievable how much work you must have put into this in order to make it look so close to real. Thanks for these amazing renderings!

[@JokubasVas]

3:23 I love how the boosters have that ambient choir music and it just transitions into the roaring of the main core 😂😂😂

[@louisshelley6631]

This looks so good. The quality is amazing. Absolutely loved the attention to detain and the lighting was really nice at 2:00. Well done

[@davidrogers8314]

31

[@jack_2037]

3:24 The cut from music to the rocket was amazing and movie like

[@exoplanets]

Yes

[@bigemugamer]

I concur. =D

[@jasonearls7259]

GOOD LORD THAT MUST BE THE MOST POWERFULL THING ON EARTH...AND OFF EARTH. WOW

[@psychos1s.]

Idk but it feels funny 😂

[@AstroGoalHorns]

@@psychos1s. ikr

[@denysxenyev3929]

Да, хорошая идея. И по идее такая система должна обладать бОльшим ресурсом и надежностью, чем Falcon с вертикальной посадкой, потому что по сути это просто набор реактивных самолетов с ракетными двигателями, просто взлетающих вертикально. А вообще конечно очень круто, респект. Надо бы сделать радиоуправляемую модель такой системы, проверить как будет летать и садиться, чисто из интереса. А потом сделать что-то вроде масштаба Rocketlab, для вывода небольших. поначалу грузов - это вполне реалистично.

[@andrewsuryali8540]

This is incredible animation, but I humbly suggest two possible changes that I hope you would consider if you ever plan to do such a project ever again. The first is that the way Energia II was designed, it was probably intended to work more like Polyus than Buran. The elongated nose section would have carried its own separate payload and final stage rocket. The connecting fairing would hide the nose of the Buran-like main stage. So the launch sequence would have been booster + main stage -> main stage -> final stage. The main stage would have returned from orbit right after launch. If the final stage carried a reentry-capable payload, then it would have had to return like a Soyuz. Otherwise, the payload could just go its merry way to orbit or beyond. Two pieces of the rocket would always be discarded: The fairing and the final stage rocket engine. The second is that the positioning of the wings would require the boosters to land with a high angle of attack, which means the landing gears in the model are too short. Also, given the empty weight of the boosters themselves, they would likely need only a fairly small and simple pair of rear landing gears. That said, this is already a very beautiful and technically accurate animation of what could have been and honestly doesn't need any improvement. I salute you and your imagination for this wonderful work of art.

[@therobot1080]

Actually, it would work almost exactly how shown, atleast for the whole payload part. The Energia 2 core would open in that way and let the payload out, but before orbit, with the payload performing final insertion, but the core could still bring itself into orbit if need be. It would "skip" over the atmosphere a few times aerodynamically to line up with its landing site then, and the rest go as it did.

[@KsaltDin]

Отличный комментарий, спасибо!

[@Vladimir-ui3ij]

Given that the real Buran landed in unmanned mode as gliding, the concept is quite realistic.

[@gavintheobald4560]

this is crazy ! just imagine the BFR with 6x falcon 9 boosters !

[@astrosasha]

reddit moment

[@ImieNazwiskoOK]

Meh. Orbital refueling better.

[@smainebelhadi1193]

It's much more better than Elon concept.

[@africanelectron751]

Much more

[@filipebraga355]

@@smainebelhadi1193 to be better it has to work

[@Ckayt1992]

Смотрю и слёзы на глаза наворачиваются.Будущее,которого не было...которое так и не наступило.

[@testvrg137]

Наступил старшип...

[@picoolov2427]

@@testvrg137no se necesita ser un anciano para tener corazon y Razon

[@brendanwood1540]

This is like an epic challenge trying to watch the whole playlist without getting the urge to play KSP so hard!

[@ColdConceptOfficial]

I most impressed by both the animation and the sound engineering...kudos to whoever glued this together

[@AlexSchendel]

Imagine how it would have transformed rocketry if this concept was built back in the 1980's. Took over 20 years to reach the sort of reusability that this rocket aimed to achieve.

[@rocketyak4014]

Yeah this was one of those amazing rockets that was born too early.

[@ancaplanaoriginal5303]

@@rocketyak4014 the Energia II was a concept someone came with after the fall of the soviet union, no real plans were made for it

[@rocketyak4014]

@@ancaplanaoriginal5303 I disagree. There was detailed planning on applications of the technologies in the Energia rocket before the collapse, with the mark II version being one of them. The ultimate plan for Energia was full reusability. However as the Soviet Union approached collapse and high cost space projects came under scrutiny, it lead the relatively expensive launch system to being cancelled. However I'll concede that plans for the building of the Energia II were limited, with the main focus on improving the mark I and making derivatives like the Energia-M.

[@alt8791]

crazy to think that if it had been built it would have serviced the ISS along with the American orbiters. Would have been quite the sight to see 2 space shuttles docked to the ISS.

[@111danish111]

SpaceX rockets are still only partially reusable you know .

[@lvwpy]

This is probably your video that I enjoyed the most. The views are amazing, those four boosters lining up for landing, just beautiful!

[@nucio95]

I've to admit that probably it's the most incredible video ever!! Astonishing the view from space!! Thanks for doing this...

[@raimundoferreira7626]

FilippoZ Vídeo from space !?

[@nucio95]

View from space after boosters separation!

[@keithbrown2458]

Absolutely beautiful incredible work thank you for sharing. I worked aerospace for 30 years and I’m impressed. Course I’ve been retired for 10 years, But that does not make it any less impressive.

[@АлексейГаак-ю7з]

Energia II was SOVIET rocket concept. Not only russian.

[@alexgainsborough4921]

U kaklyadi podgorelo XDDDDD

[@tankogradec]

@@alexgainsborough4921 ну вообще то он дело говорит, такие проекты разрабатывались всем совком

[@burzhumhungun7652]

@@tankogradec по башке тебе совком

[@bbro3440]

Man! ESA's rocket demonstrations need you! This is awesome

[@narwalsman8471]

what?

[@leobieker9631]

This is awesome dude. Mad respect for putting in the time and effort to do these spacecraft justice. Keep doing what your doing!

[@OldGamerNoob]

At the beginning here I actually thought I was watching original launch footage I had never seen before. VERY well done simulation.

[@andreylag2184]

Впечатляет! Спасибо за визуализацию!

[@adarshsr8015]

The most underrated channel on youtube!

[@adarshsr8015]

@Şahanşah Bnoarg Thank you!

[@fuzzyboi1721]

Why isn't your channel more popular!?! The animations you make better than pretty much anything I have ever seen. Your better than Mustard even. I hope you get recognised for you work one day, please keep it up!

[@riot2136]

Fuzzy Boi well the animations are better, but they don’t narrate or show a bunch of information about the craft and how it was designed and the logistics of it. Both channels are great.

[@fuzzyboi1721]

@@riot2136 I probably should have been more clear. Thats basically what i meant

[@milotv120]

People in Kazakstan: living Also them: Why is the 4 boosters landing here

[@LightningShiva1]

Bruh, there's fixed locations

[@adidia2163]

@Sascha Sebastian nah.. it just rapid unscheduled disassembly

[@arcaipekyun4232]

Sascha Sebastian its everywhere this way you know right? Russia-kazakhstan, US, China, ESA

[@milotv120]

@@arcaipekyun4232 well, yes but *takes out falcon 9*

[@1312_PV]

@@arcaipekyun4232 in China they have fallen over population.

[@centaurupperstageenthusiast]

3:23 * Holy music stops *

[@martintiburciocruz3153]

lol. boosters: *looking amazing and majestic* Orbiter: "I'm About to End This Man's Whole Career"

[@СашаБаюков-щ2ю]

Как.было.бы.нормально.если.мы.не.боялись.бы.радиаацыи.

[@poljakov13]

unholy silence starts

[@That_Freedom_Guy]

Putting wings on boosters and gliding them back seems like a good idea. I honestly never thought of that before! As always , fantastic work! Thanks! 👍

[@Danger_mouse]

What a wild concept, love it 👍

[@CarlosAM1]

I swear I made something almost equal to this in ksp, just with a spaceshuttle ish cargo bay and a single big thrusters bfr style, it takes off, stages, booster is light af and lands easily, then the rest gets to orbit, deploys a payload, deorbits, lands like a space shuttle because its light since the tank is empty.

[@adrianj2666]

good job

[@exoplanets]

:O

[@inthefade]

It is a cool idea, landing like a shuttle (if you have runways).

[@Astrelix]

Me too, but with the boosters

[@Oombu008]

Post it on KZbin dude.

[@Leon-Hardt]

-Space X: "I was the first to build a rocket reusable" -NPO Energia: "Ha!...,Hold my vodka"

[@mildot5482]

Looooool

[@cwehbe]

Energia was just a cartoon and concept, it never existed! Space X exists. See the difference.

[@sampokemppainen3041]

@@cwehbe yeah. Stealing other's work is considered success.

[@alexspartan3842]

@@sampokemppainen3041 stealing? and from who exactly? pretty sure you don't really know what you are talking about lol

[@crugleberryandfriends4740]

This is a concept video the real Energia only launched twice, and the only recoverable part of it was the Buran shuttle it launched on its second flight.

[@iliketrains0pwned]

4:52 Soviet Space Program: Builds the Energia II as a successor to the Energia-Buran program Also the Soviet Space Program: _Still uses Soyuz to dock with the ISS..._

[@DragonSFS]

Energia II isn't manned

[@andreylebedenko1260]

Мультики с каждым годом всё лучше.

[@edga7999]

Это не мультик, БАРАН, это пректы которые будут реализованы. 😉

[@ОлегМарченко-б7б]

@@edga7999 )))))) Ахахахахахахаха

[@Vitaly_Sketch]

@@edga7999 когда нибуть , но это не точно

[@rk-700simplechanell2]

@@edga7999 но это не точно 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@Андрей-д1х8й]

@@edga7999 вот такими пректами вас и кормят

[@CausticLemons7]

That was super cool! Really hope Roscosmos can get back to doing amazing space work.

[@k-osmonaut8807]

search about the yenisei

[@lenar1763]

no man, we can't because Rogozin can only tease others. He is not the greatest constructor like Korolyov

[@mzsov]

@@lenar1763 He's not even an engineer or scientist.

[@juliap.5375]

Max S Two idiots? Rogozin is head of corporation (de facto ministry). Korolev was head of design department, just constructor, one of many. He was not ministry. Different roles, different goals, different everything. You both need return back to school and study what state is and how it organized. And for you knowledge, head of NASA is former director of museum. Incredible level of stupidity.

[@constantinethecataphract5949]

I would prefer a more competent Space program like the Chinese to build sth like this to be honest.

[@robertevans6481]

Awesome, wish we could see the main section land as well,but it was awesome to see the boosters line up for landing. 👌

[@baxterjohnson-ronald]

I've read about this concept before, and it was really interesting. This rendering makes it a whole lot interestinger!

[@antoninmathieu8701]

I would like to re-do some of these things on Ksp. This rendering is of very very good quality.

[@eduardodiaz5459]

=...( Beautiful... So sad that the time for those ideas had passed.

[@ImieNazwiskoOK]

What about Starship?

[@ImieNazwiskoOK]

@Luke skywalker The Starfleet commander Yes. It's very cool because it uses liquid Hydrolox so yes it's very cool, literally.

[@hmmmmmm7512]

@@ImieNazwiskoOK this was planned in 2000 by soviet union but USSR collapsed in 1991. Compared to starship its 2021. And energia is flexible and can transport more to orbit because they had more chamber pressure. And efficient.

[@pseudotasuki]

@@hmmmmmm7512 Energiya had significantly less payload capacity than Starship. In fact, even Falcon Heavy in a fully-expendable launch beats it.

[@pseudotasuki]

@@ImieNazwiskoOK Starship is a very different concept.

[@TheK4nT0]

2:10 - 2:20 absolutely breathtaking, mesmerizing reflection, incredible... true cinematic experience

[@redpug5042]

people laugh at this idea, but people also laughed at Elon when he said he was going to land a rocket booster, and then that he was going to make a fully and rapidly reusable rocket. Here we are, just months away from its first orbital flight, and less than a year from seeing a booster and/or starship being caught.

[@luoyufan7771]

Awesome job! I hope the directors of "for all mankind" can consider adding this scene to their next season.

[@MrHichammohsen1]

Bro i am in LOVE with your work!

[@JustinRK81]

I agree but if you have a free moment will you please read my comment and help answer the question I stated...

[@MrHichammohsen1]

@@JustinRK81 Can't find it. Can you please ask it here?

[@KsaltDin]

Спасибо за вашу прекрасную работу!

[@vibrolax]

You're always going to get a thumbs up from me. A bit too heavy film scratch effect at the beginning, but nicely muted colors. Needed more distance haze, as the depths around the launch pad weren't quite convincing. I know how much care you put into each work, and I appreciate the results.

[@HuntingTarg]

*GREAT* visual composition and rendering. I'm quite impressed. Having a US Orbiter at the ISS looks like zeerust, but is still wistfully appealing to type like me.

[@landonr4370]

I love this concept a lot and truly wish it had flown. It's kind of sad that only now do we have prospects of fully reusable spacecraft with Starship on the horizon. Of course, ignoring the SN1 failure lmao.

[@jeffvader811]

Yea, the thing that holds back most of our space-aspirations has never been physics but politics. Plus, from an entirely aesthetic standpoint, spaceplanes like this are cooler than self landing boosters in my opinion. They feel a bit more elegant and bird like, nonetheless both are extremely impressive from an engineering standpoint.

[@DOSFS]

Wing concept for booster has problems especially the added component for landing (flight control computer, wheels, wings) and the separated speed is too much for normal wing.

[@yuriivashchenko7668]

You probably wouldnt open the wings till about Mach one. Much like the Falcon 9, youd get a fair bit of body lift at hypersonic speeds

[@cosmicandrew50]

Khanet Preeteepveruriya it would work. It’s an option and currently we don’t know what the best option will be.

[@DOSFS]

@@cosmicandrew50 That the main problems, is it work better compare to other methods. For now is no

[@craigrmeyer]

Maestro! Maestro! You're doing magic with these, leading people to re-imagine the past, and what could have been, so that we can't help but re-imagine the future, and what could be. I'm not kidding.

[@eldencw]

Amazing graphic artistry! [ as always!]

[@TheUltrabeatdown]

Fantastic work, the rendering is on point ! Sound design is great as well

[@YuriYoshiosan]

Energia Rocket, With Buran Aerodynamic Wings. *Perfect.* *And cruise missile as boosters* Wow.

[@endrioinfiniti]

nice joke/meme but just letting u know the boosters arent missiles. dont r/woooosh me i got the joke but still sayin

[@blakelowrey9620]

Woosh

[@YuriYoshiosan]

@@blakelowrey9620 You fell for it, fool. r/wooooshwith4os

[@Turambar3791]

One of your best videos if not the best!

[@GameplayReviewUK]

I loved this video :)

[@MrHerodoto]

Excellent video and concept. One more subscriber.

[@McClarinJ]

The concept was the Energia II. I googled it to find out when the concept was proposed. Notations on the Wikipedia page about Energia ask that very question. I wondered if Bezos and Musk were aware of the design concept before beginning development on their own reusable launch systems. Nice work BTW!

[@Putins-mustache]

Flyback booster (version) Baikal kzbin.info/www/bejne/oWO2Z3mkqdCchLs

[@juliap.5375]

It was part of Energia project, next stages, canceled together with USSR as a lot of other projects, including Energia itself. Russia tried to sold similar system in early 2000s (look for Baikal rocket booster, nobody bought), so that project also died. In Roscosmos program (2016-2025) exist two similar projects (one from Makeyev Rocket Design Bureau and another from Khrunichev State Research and Production Space Center), but it is unknown is it theoretical works (for preserve of knowledge and experience) or practical works.

[@Horesmi]

Musk has almost certainly studied this design. In the end, his methods of reusability are just better. And they are better because they are more advanced - after all, they are developed 40 years later. Back in the day the soviets couldn't automate a vertical landing as well as they could a horizontal one.

[@kirgan1000]

The consept of reusable launch systems was well known from Von Braun book Das Marsprojekt/The Mars Project from 1952/1953. Cant imagen that a Mars nutt like Musk did not know about The Mars Project book, writen by one of the world most successful and (in)famous rocket designer.

[@vulpes7456]

@@juliap.5375 Automatic systems of the USSR made the landing of the space Shuttle "Buran" in unmanned mode. Do you know what a pain in the ass it is to land a space Shuttle? The USSR did not develop a vertical landing because...this system has no advantages, only disadvantages. Disadvantages of the system: a Parasitic load of fuel, without it, the rocket displays a large weight, but the ability to return the rocket stages is lost. The rocket becomes disposable. Stability when landing is affected by everything! Wind, humidity, worn handlebars, nozzles, vibration, calculation errors, etc. Pros: It looks beautiful. Like a circus performance )

[@1218omaroo]

Simply sensational. I can’t imagine the computing power and skills necessary to do this, and I’ve been in computing for forty years. Well done sir, hat is off.

[@EgorAfonin]

Здорово) Спасибо автору за работу! Теперь люди увидят мысль наших конструкторов

[@metanumia]

Как западный житель, во времена холодной войны и до сегодняшнего дня мы с большим уважением относились к вашей родной технике и технологиям. Представьте себе, что Запад и Восток могут наконец мирно объединиться и объединить наши огромные инженерные возможности для колонизации космоса! Это моя мечта.

[@EgorAfonin]

Anodyne Melody, да. Это было бы здорово, пример тому международная космическая станция. Я сам являюсь авиационным инженером и с детства вдохновлялся достижениями СССР и США. Но политики не заинтересованы в техническом прогрессе, бюрократии нужны деньги и в развитии науки она не заинтересована...

[@bpwarrior1]

@@metanumia Не могут

[@EgorAfonin]

@@LastEventHorizon , докажите.

[@EgorAfonin]

@@LastEventHorizon , почему ты решил, что я должен сам себе доказывать твоё же высказывание? Хочу твои примеры увидеть или они голословные?

[@florianN132]

The sound at initial launch is just incredibly cool in your videos... VERY well done

[@СергейКрокута]

да здравствует наше несостоявшиеся будущие! ура товарищи! очень красивое видео!

[@HH-xf9il]

Looks great, tell Putin to build it !

[@mikhail_z]

Sencis Вся жизнь - это борьба с экономической выгодой

[@danielwilson7567]

а выгодополучатель явно не простой ваня, платящий налоги

[@timsteel1060]

@Sencis ну ты то экономист от бога, да еще и со стажем, тёплое с мягким не попутаешь даже под кислотой, ага.

[@timsteel1060]

@Sencis вот именно

[@johnconnor9012]

great job guys. nobody has ever described cosmonautics so clearly. great job.

[@sirko1994]

The quality of your videos is amazing! The project Uragan is great!

[@datathunderstorm]

I just came back to watch this - the visuals combined with the accompanying soundtrack are just astounding to experience! Love the inspirational soundtrack.

[@cmilkau]

Hmm, orbiter reentry is missing. I guess space shuttle style?

[@msb3235]

Yeah, I wish he did animation on that too!

[@Peter_Schluss-Mit-Lustig]

@@serghw arent you talking about the buran here? If i remember correctly this thing was made to bounce off of the upper atmosphere on reentry to slow it down more efficiently

[@alt8791]

From what I heard, the Uragan booster would deploy a Buran or Polyus-type payload, or possibly a third stage, then skip off the atmosphere like that WWII German bomber thing until it was back over the CCCP, then re-enter and land like the Buran.

[@epsilon3-175]

@@alt8791 Congrats! You're correct!

[@alt8791]

@@epsilon3-175 yAaAaAaY

[@zaffman]

This was one of the designs considered for the US Space Shuttle. Didn’t happen thanks to a continual lack of insight by the US Congress.

[@geofisika8838]

And you thought Falcon Heavy Boosters land beautifully! This is true beauty!

[@muhammadirfanataulawal7630]

Tbh I got goosebump when the booster glide gracefully and lands

[@wmason1961]

Except that it was never actually done. Big difference there.

[@13thbiosphere]

@@wmason1961 two silk paragliders would have been better than wings

[@odysseusrex5908]

One is real, one is fantasy.

[@BattlestarZenobia]

I officially declare the Uragan to be showing off. Can you imagine how the US would have reacted if the Soviets had done this at the end if the 80s. Something akin to the Sputnik shock maybe, I mean Buran itsalef humiliated NASA with the aditional safety features and the automated landing

[@LexieAssassin]

It's stuff like this that makes me miss the Soviet Union. Everything else can go in the dumpster.

[@Kirealta]

Ah yes, the biggest threat to global peace and all that starvation. The good old days.

[@Consigpal]

And colapse of SSSR brought peace...

[@Kirealta]

@@Consigpal We haven't come close to nuclear war. The only true war. You should pray to Vasily arkipov every night. The only true Soviet hero.

[@nicknamenick9448]

Consigpal where do u see a peace? War is everywhere

[@Kirealta]

@@nicknamenick9448 you're so innocent.

[@MrBigCookieCrumble]

Fantastic, seeing the boosters glide back to the runway was just amazing.

[@renino_4770]

Nice job!

[@Вальдемар-щ1м]

Fantastic spectacle-фантастическое зрелище!

[@widget3672]

I had to ask - do you really think the payload fairing would open on a single hinge? It's a beautiful video and it was nice seeing an older rendition of the ISS, camera angles and sound were spectacular, it's such a cool design and I love how smart it is as a rocket concept, just such a shame Russia never took it further.

[@coenogo]

The Soviets had this minor collapse thing that kinda hindered their space endavours.

[@Lea_Kaderova]

I think in reality, this concept is reasonable only for smaller boosters like side boosters of Soyuz (empty weight about 3,5 t) or side boosters of Proton and wings deploying system would be something adapted from supersonic cruise missiles for example like this in 16:25 kzbin.info/www/bejne/kKech5Z7fd6dqJY or something much simpler like wings on kalibr missiles.

[@Skyserstudio]

Epic work! Fantastic render and music.

[@funny-video-YouTube-channel]

Self-landing rocket boosters solve all of that complexity away. That is why the modern rockets from SpaceX are cheaper to make.

[@lazarus2691]

Even ignoring that and staying within the realm of flyback boosters, using four separate boosters is still needlessly complex. A two stage system like Starship/BFR would have been a much better idea, and indeed some of the early shuttle designs were just that: i.imgur.com/WTu7C9L.jpg

[@sebastianochoa5385]

flyback is less complex. for landing the boosters you have to save fuel, and be able to steer.

[@СоюзниксОкинавы]

@@sebastianochoa5385 The main problem with that like landing is that rocket designed for resist against vertical forces, but for this like landing it's need to resist forces that applied in other directions. And it's pretty hard and make rocket heavy.

[@deregapreyahvattaffdiff]

Actually for Russian geography glide back might be a better idea than VTOL. As a downrange landing zone have to be somewhere deep in Siberia and have to be a fixed place, unlike a drone ship which can move on its own, limited its launch azimuth unless you are willing to pay for a massive landing pad and extremely large road/rail network much larger than what they already have across Siberia or go full kerbal and make gigantic "Autonomous Space Port Crawler".

[@СоюзниксОкинавы]

@@deregapreyahvattaffdiff BTW, Amur stages, without fuel and payload will have weight less than 20 tons (because bigger Falcon 9 FT Block 5 have 23 tons). kzbin.info/www/bejne/r5uwo4WPbrBsh7M This machine (ПММ-2М) can transport 42,5 tons, floatable. 2 of them can be connected to carry 85 tons, and 3 of them can transport 127,5 tons. So, "Autonomous Space Port Crawler" it's not a bad idea...

[@skyr8449]

Super under-rated I wish that it had more views.

[@necronlord52]

Срочно нарисуйте нам мультик. Нужно больше мультиков!

[@johnbearross]

Glorious work. Keep it up.

[@АндрейБ-ь8л]

Хороший проект жалко что просрали .

[@volo870]

Практически невыполнимый проект. Куда ступени сажать? В Пакистан? Китай? Да и не созрели тогда технологии для такого проекта - десяток одноразовых Протонов всегда был бы дешевле в эксплуатации.

[@Andrey_Ivanov194]

У нас был гораздо более экономически перспективный проект - Зенит-3SL и Морской Старт. Просрали в угоду мудакам, лоббировавшим продолжение производства Протона и коммерческие пуски с Байконура.

[@volo870]

@@Andrey_Ivanov194 Зенит-3SL и Морской Старт были реализованы в 1999 году, уже при совсем независимой Украине. РФ удавится вместо того, чтоб сотрудничать с Украиной. Это не лобби - это политика и неоправданные имперские амбиции.

[@Putins-mustache]

Было пять специальных аэродромов, плюс военные, плюс наравне рассматривали посадки на гражданские аэродромы Flyback booster "in the metal" (version) Baikal kzbin.info/www/bejne/oWO2Z3mkqdCchLs

[@Леонид-у9т]

@@volo870 что ты несёш,как раз украина и начала выёживаться!в итоге заводы ушли в никуда,почти все специалисты разъехались по разным странам!доскакались мля.

[@Exalerion]

Sideboosters landing as airplanes? That's the most freakin' kerbal thing I've ever seen LOL!

[@lha987]

i really love these communist punk design

[@thestudentofficial5483]

is there a term for that? lol

[@exoplanets]

Me too

[@Kirealta]

@@thestudentofficial5483 Starvation.

[@kommentator5730]

Sovietpunk

[@Putins-mustache]

Flyback booster (version) Baikal kzbin.info/www/bejne/oWO2Z3mkqdCchLs

[@alvianchoiriapriliansyah9882]

Thanks for sharing. Very cool

[@NSPlayer]

Love the space scenes too, need longer more distant traversing

[@christophehatch-berthier6365]

Wonderful rendering. Bravo Monsieur. My best regards to you from the Rhône-Alpes, France.

[@worldmanagerpeacemaker]

ОПЯТЬ МУЛЬТИКИ ??? ВОДКА УРАГАН, СНОСИТ КРЫШУ НА ВСЕГДА !

[@hisangrogus9873]

а ты не пей… глядишь и от тебя польза всему народу будет… только трезвый русский может воплотить сказку в быль… а мультики в реальные проекты…

[@baikonur58]

Сначала были мультики про войну банановых республик и все ржали, но потом вдруг прилетели Калибры и смеху поубавилось. Дальше показали кино про гиперзвук под визг и хохот партнёров и их шавок, но появился Кинжал и визг притих. Не сомневайтесь, что и по остальным мультикам будет продолжение в реале. Жаль, что не так быстро, как хотелось бы, но это будет!

[@ТрамТарарам-с9л]

К сожалению.. как царь пушка и царь ракета....

[@AIBookshelf-e3n]

Вова, этот мультик покажет на ежегодном выступление! новое секретное разработка отечественной ракетно космической отросли! только сейчас и здесь !

[@sergsol4515]

@@baikonur58 , куда прилетели калибры, иранцы показали, ни одного рабочего образца кинжала до сих пор не найдено. Мультики, пиздёж; мультики, пиздёж; и так изо дня в день. Михаил, смени пластинку.

[@guyfrompoland1358]

You keep getting better at it everytime

[@АнтонК-м8о]

Прости нас, Юра! Мы всё просрали...

[@bandera6213]

Не мы. А Пу

[@АнтонК-м8о]

@@bandera6213 задолго до него отказались от возвращаемых систем

[@demoonk420]

Гагарин не был конструктором. Это был космонавт.

[@demoonk420]

@@bandera6213 я видел как Путин кирпичи таскал, а потом бетон заливал. Толи дело при Ельцине. Сверхдержавой были.

[@АнтонК-м8о]

@Hapalon G космодромы будем строить вечно, пока есть что воровать

[@testvrg137]

What about landing of Uragan?) T😊he fairing moved onto the body, and the rocket landed like an airplane.

[@pepperbean243]

Well done!!!

[@Deserthacker]

Amazing, once again. Thanks for doing these!

[@nhhfdyhvdfghh]

Возможно, когда-нибудь Россия сможет осилить такой сложный проект. Спасибо за ролик!

[@Regenerator_]

Андрей Самодуров, она даже такую анимацию не осилит)))

[@Andrey_Ivanov194]

Нам бы локализацию производства Зенита освоить, и хоть как-то прибиться к проекту окололунной станции. Про новую Энергию и аналог Флакона сейчас уже даже мечтать бессмысленно.

[@nhhfdyhvdfghh]

@@Andrey_Ivanov194 мечтать в новых реалиях как раз осмысленно: теперь не государственная монополия на ракеты и выход в космос. Уже даже коммерческих проектов многоразвых систем в РФ насчитывается более 3-ёх. Они скромнее, чем из США, но дело стоит за первоначальными успехами и ростом интереса со стороны инвесторов.

[@nhhfdyhvdfghh]

@@Andrey_Ivanov194 В ОКБ S7 Space уже перетекла часть инженеров и управленцев ЦЕНКИ.

[@vitalegvitalegov]

@@nhhfdyhvdfghh это какие у нас коммерческие ракеты появились? 😯

[@zeemeijer]

Great animation! for a second I thought it was real. Well done! очень хорошо

[@Maravone]

In a very close timeline the USSR didnt collapse and this thing actually flew, putting a lunar station in space, and opening up the road to Mars.

[@BrianBetron]

Great job keep up the good work.

[@YF-23]

IDK if u realise that but everything u do is breathtakin to watch

[@colefrink4795]

I am so happy this came up in my recommended this was super cool I just subscribed

[@la_sasha]

It's Gorbachev's fault that this engineering masterpiece didn't actually get to exist

[@juliap.5375]

Gorbachev, Yakovlev, Gaidar... whole team.

[@la_sasha]

Julia P. Actually yes

[@USAmerican100]

Boosters would have tail strike on landing with that short landing gear.

[@matthewblack7206]

Awesome. I have written a novella; dramatizing a 'Red Dragon', 2x person 'Flags and Footprints' mission to Mars. Falcon Heavy is the principle launcher. I wish I could get you to animate that little epic for me!! Also; have you read Stephen Baxter's 'Voyage' about an Enhanced-Apollo mission to Mars in the 1980s?

[@MarcioLima-dp3fw]

I guess the advantage of Spacex's approach for reusability of the first stage(s) make sense: instead of adding wings, wheels, etc., just add a little more fuel/lox and some fins. Simpler is better.

[@doodleboi7034]

Agree

[@caav56]

Funnily enough, they've tried to start with parachutes, but none of their parachute-equipped stages survived to the point of deploying chutes due to hypersonic reentry. To survive, they've needed to do an entry burn... and by that point, if you do one burn - why not do two of them, with the second one being actual landing one, while swapping chutes for legs and gridfins? Less hassle returning stage from a platform in the ocean, than of having to fish it out and repair the salt-water damage.

[@doodleboi7034]

@@caav56 To be honest, Parachutes won't always work.

[@caav56]

@@doodleboi7034 Indeed. Just sharing how the reusability development went for SpaceX.

[@jimbodeek]

Honestly, though... Having boosters fly back like planes is still a pretty cool idea...

[@YF-23]

If this was real this woud have been awesome to watch especially with spaceX like cameras onboard!

[@ImieNazwiskoOK]

SpaceX's methode is more effective

[@YF-23]

@@ImieNazwiskoOK but this is cool too

[@JakeBiddlecome]

Nice audio - those sea level engines have a very satisfying sound. As for the concept, I'm all for new ideas and I love the last decade of new rocket designs, but I'm not sure how this idea could have really been taken seriously. Those boosters are reentering at several times the speed of sound. If they weren't instantly torn off at deployment they certainly would on that bank it made. Plus that is a ton of unnecessary weight for the three sets of landing gear, wings, and heavier fuselage to withstand that landing, on each booster! Looks cool as hell - I'll give it that.