Entanglement is not enough || Leonard Susskind

[@judekessey7913]

Coincidently I was listening to 'Russel's Paradox' by Jeffrey Kaplan, when I came here - Leonard's Complexity expands the entangled Quantum somewhat, both are mathematically defined...amazing how the syncrocity of perplexing subjects confound !? 👣🌏🌀

[@Achrononmaster]

@10:00 what bugged Feynman was that Feynman succumbed to the bias of thinking superpositions were physical superpositions. They are not, they are information-theoretic. We hardly ever observe a superposition, only consequences of superposed information. Closed timelike curves (ER=EPR) can explain this. The few experiments sensitive enough to reveal superpositions are those where the apparatus is not set-up to detect an eigenstate. They are very rare experiments, very difficult. They require getting signals out of a spacetime cobordism where a particle (or system) was in different states very nearby in time, without disturbing those states appreciably, without violating unitarity and without violating causal consistency. Most such experiments give a very, shall we say, "shadowy" signal, enough to say, "yeah there was a superposition," but never enough to cleanly have the same mass at different places in space at the same time, so there is no doubling or quadrupling or infinite-multiplication of matter that Feynman feared. Closed timelike curves allow fundamental "geons" to be at different places at the same time, but not detectably so, once you detect an elementary geon (or, *_that_*_ which can traverse the Planck scale wormholes_ let's say) then by causal consistency it cannot be detected anywhere else, it would be a different state (due to the interactions in the detection) and often a whole different particle, due to interaction. The chances you can actually detect a particle and not have it's state change or re-set, thus drastically reducing it's influence on a cobordism past lightcone structure is small to vanishing.

[@Achrononmaster]

i should add for clarification, this ER=EPR account of superposition phenomenon is statistical. The logic is that of a non-distributive lattice of propositions (so non-classical) but the physics is quasi-classical (GR but with Lorentzian wormholes). The point is, CTCs do not just permit arbitrary superposition, we only get what superposition the wormhole topology allows. So it is not metaphysical superposition as one would assume taking QM postulates axiomatically. it is onyl ever an _effective_ superposition --- meaning because we cannot detect general superposition, we have to assume all states do in fact exist, as a purely mathematical procedure, it is a statistical method, _not_ a method that is saying all these states _have_ to occur in reality. In reality, only some finite measure of them need to occur, the point is we cannot tell which, since we do not know the wormhole topology, we can never predict which states in a general superposition will be actually physical, so we treat them all as potentially physical. Hence the infinite sums or Feynman path integrals. They are mathematical constructs, not physical things, they get us the right probabilistic answers, because so many of the possible superposed states will in fact occur somewhere in a cobordism. As Feynman knew, space is plenty vast enough to accommodate a very large number of superposed states in a given cobordism, just not actually infinitely many, which is what bugged him. Wormhole traversal statistics fundamentally limit how profligate the _real_ finite superposition underlying the infinite mathematical superposition idealization can get. Although CTCs (ER=EPR) make the logic non-distributive (hence "quantum mechanical"), the rest is pretty classical, like the need to imagine infinite rolls of a pair of dice to think of the exact probability of throwing aces, or whatever.

[@notorious_tbageryt1115]

By using data sheets created from the same source expanding in any direction also calculating the amount of revolution or controlling the amount of revolutions the entanglement beyond a black hole can be achieved only with a 3rd particle communication point settling at zero point .0. Receiving and sending packages at A & C ( & = B = Bandwidth of graphite particles , amplified connection with Greater power then the field it self ( .0. ) light bends so it can’t be light / frequencies would have to have (.0.) of (.0.) the 1st (.0.) being physical matter the 2nd (.0.) being the center of the universe/black hole then the length of the funneling we send a stream of particles straight down (.0.) acceleration you can expand the (.0.) field by energetic expansion fractal size @ this point I leave other individuals to write that information because I have my limits on how much i am willing to contribute.

[@Achrononmaster]

@1:20 in an entangled system you do know _bounds_ on the parts, just not specifics.

[@danwelsh6706]

Can someone help me I have a Question : Leonard has spoken about the possibility of a black holes event horizon storing the information of all the matter that falls into it and that we may exist within such a structure..If this is so it would make sense that we exist bound to the event horizon as everything is numerical and mechanical in our perception of the known universe?..the problem I see is we had to fall into the void in the first instance and that would mean spaghettification had to occur tearing everything asunder and doesn't that mean that everything we know doesn't exist anymore and we are nothing more than the data stored on the EH?.. If this is a possibility then we can never see the real scale of things because time slows on the EH and time beyond that would be running at a different speed so moving towards it would be pointless as we are entangled in the mighty hold of a black hole.

[@reimannx33]

Folks, he may have totally lost it.