I really appreciate the fact that there is no ads. Thank you for teaching us!
@jamiedell2404Ай бұрын
I'm loving this! To answer your question, YES. Although, it seemed to happen in series'. My mind was all over the place at work and I was given an ultimatum, focus on work or pursue my dream. I chose the later and moved state.. Unfortunately..(maybe/maybe not!?) that didn't work and I ended up moving back to my original state where I landed an amazing job, met a girl, bought a house and new car, then sold it all to move states and travel for 12 months. We started all once we got back, landed another but hit a fork in the road..we split up, I turned to alcohol and have been through hell since with nothing to show but the memories. I've been in and out rehabilitation for 2 years on and off and always looking for that next opportnitistic thing to come along.. Keep it up Stephen, I'm sure you are helping people than you realise!! Love from Australia ❤
@amineech1621 Жыл бұрын
Great episode, thank you very much.
@lucasjanine20003 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@nickyoung38353 жыл бұрын
This was awesome, thanks
@ugurarslan57234 жыл бұрын
great episode. thanks
@Over-Boy4210 ай бұрын
The whole " Getting everything you want becomes misery" reminds me of the Twilight Zone episode, "A nice place to visit"
@americanpyrrho9774 жыл бұрын
At 13:46, your summary that "What the skeptics said is that every cognitive impression, no matter how solid it may seem, will be indistinguishable from some other impression," is confused. In Chapter X of The Outlines of Pyrrhonism (PH) , Sextus Empiricus writes the following, "Those who say that “ the Skeptics abolish appearances,” or phenomena, seem to me to be unacquainted with the statements of our School. For, as we said above, we do not overthrow the affective sense-impressions which induce our assent involuntarily ; and these impressions are “ the appearances.” And when we question whether the underlying object is such as it appears, we grant the fact that it appears, and our doubt does not concern the appearance itself but the account given of that appearance,-and that is a different thing from questioning the appearance itself. This difference between the impression and "the account given of it," is of the greatest importance. The two are not the same. It is always "the account," upon which one should maintain a skeptical suspension of judgement and NOT "the impression," itself, which is involuntarily impressed upon a person.
@itsmezalos Жыл бұрын
Thanks for this.
@valleybiitch3 жыл бұрын
who tf bites into a pomegranate 💀
@bradleycollin6444 жыл бұрын
For the question of the week I got kicked out of my school district for a very stupid mistake, at my new school i met my girlfriend who ive been with for the last 2 years
@Human_Evolution-5 жыл бұрын
The Dan Carlin of philosophy.
@christinemartin632 жыл бұрын
Oh boy ... !
@randyrustybuts95664 жыл бұрын
i laugh like a mad man ? i where ear plugs ha-ha-he-he,...
@justamoteofdust4 жыл бұрын
Such an amazing explanation of scepticism man. This channel is growing on me lately. ❤️👍🏾 Monopoly of thought? Yeah, capitalism qualifies pretty much. 😉
@stephannaro21134 жыл бұрын
Mr. X was also turned down by Grocer M. He also felt miserable for a week and a half before getting a job at a third grocer, Grocer O. One day he too met his future wife at the grocer, but not where he was working, Grocer O. On his way home he remembered something he had forgotten to buy at work, but he was almost home so popped into the nearest grocer, Grocer M - the one he had been rejected by. You're talking about accidents. Accidents are irrelevant for regulating your emotions. I could equally easily invent a scenario closer to your own where the hapless fellow never meets any future wife - though he might have done so if he had gotten the job at Grocer M.
@nosamsemaj91505 жыл бұрын
Yo cover Might is Right by Arthur Desmond/Ragnar Redbeard shit is interesting and pretty unheard of.