Episode 22: The Kepler Problem - The Mechanical Universe

[@paulg444]

David Goodstein in these lectures is a gift to the world !

[@LoneStarGemini]

The algebra graphics are done so quickly that it actually helps to pause the video, write down the equations, and do the math yourself. 😬👍🏼

[@powerdriller4124]

Pause the video is now easy, in the 1980s when the program was first broadcast, once we had done the burden job of recording the video from the air signal we could play it, but pausing was blurred; trying to go from one section to the other required rewinding for minutes.

[@afonsodeportugal]

Kepler's achievements are even more remarkable when one considers the great tragedy that was his personal life... what an extraordinary man!

[@sivakumar-oh2if]

Oh man u r almost in all the videos in this series 🙏🙏🙏👏👏😱😱

[@afonsodeportugal]

@@sivakumar-oh2if Yes. I find this TV show brilliant. Imagine if the producers had the resources that are available today!

[@sivakumar-oh2if]

@@afonsodeportugalyes bro, if the producers r having the resources that r now, they can make an excellent video lesson that r soo easy to understand and getting a degree is not very hard with those lectures we can complete degree very fast bcz we can easily understand the concepts of subjects and the peoples who watches those lectures all become phd students 🙏🙏🙏

[@afonsodeportugal]

3:39 “The crowning glory of the Renaissance”: using Newton’s inverse square law of gravity (law of universal gravitation) and Newton’s second law of motion to obtain a second order differential equation for the orbit of a planet; the solution to that equation is an algebraic equation that can be used to describe any conic section. 7:50 “Twist or torque cannot be applied by gravity”; substituting F by M.a in r x F = 0 and using the product derivative rule to obtain the differential equation d/dt(M.r + v) = 0, which can be integrated to obtain a constant quantity L, the angular momentum. 8:49 “A planet orbiting with constant angular momentum L stays in a single plane; its orbital speed varies in a precisely determined way; the area A swept by its radius vector r changes at a constant rate”, i.e. dA/dr =1/2r x v (Kepler’s second law). 11:02 “Newton’s discovery that the orbits of all objects in the heavens obey the equation of the conic sections started out as a question: why are the planetary orbits ellipses sweeping out equal areas in equal times? The answer is most easily found in polar coordinates where the rate of change of area dA /dt is equal to ½.r².dθ/dt. In terms of angular momentum, the result is a differential equation obeyed by all objects moving under any central force L = M.r².dθ/dt.” 17:58 Using Newton’s universal law of gravitation, the second law of motion and the conservation of angular momentum to obtain a x L = D.dȓ/dt, which is then integrated to obtain v x L = D.(ȓ + e) and finally r = (L²/DM)/(1+e.cosθ), the algebraic equation that can be used to describe any conic section.

[@skeeterburke]

r hat! Howd you do that?

[@Mayank-mf7xr]

Nicely put

[@sivakumar-oh2if]

👌👌👌👌👏👏👏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@sivakumar-oh2if]

Plz can any one explain, at 8:13 how dr/dt times v became v and disappeared and left with r times dv/dt

[@davidwilkie9551]

Episode 21 established the pivotal foci, string-like nature of conic-cyclonic modulo-geometrical cross-sectional compositions,to use in building on point-line-circle Geometric Drawing techniques, for triangulation and charting in navigation systems and basic Observation of a beautiful Mathemagical Revolution, but still had not chipped away the dross to reveal the kind of knowledge in Michaelangelo's art and craft. Pure-math Fluxion-Integral Temporal Calculus structural-coordination holography-quantization is ready for 2023 Students to work on.

[@universocalculado4639]

Entendi , depois que Kepler formulou suas três leis , ele criou um grande problema . Por exemplo , por que os planetas se movem em elipses com o raio vetor varrendo áreas iguais em tempos iguais ? e a resposta de Newton foi que , os planetas se movem dessa maneira , porque seu movimento é determinado pelo momento angular constante ( já que ele percebeu que a gravidade não gera torção , mas que a gravidade é apenas uma força de atração ) e pela lei de gravitação universal , gerando assim uma nova expressão para a primeira lei de Kepler ( r = L² / DM / 1 + cosθ ) . Há , mais uma coisa , que interessante essa comparação das ciências com as artes , a poesia e a música , achei legal .

[@mohammadfallahzade2110]

Incredible Episode. Thanks for sharing

[@philoso377]

Wondering why the class writes with the left hand?

[@rafazm]

Where can i find a reference to the SOUNDTRACK?

[@afonsodeportugal]

Good question!

[@mappingtheshit]

Look for in 17th century

[@philoso377]

There are two ways to appreciate the “pulling” force. 1, spontaneously : Pull by matter. 2, reasonably : Pull by vacuum. But there is nothing in vacuum? Vacuum is filled with Aether where gravity force and electric force resides. We are experiencing those forces and have ruled out existence of Aether? No, we have not. We only ruled it out by mistake, in believing it exists detached from and blow through matter like wind. By mistake? absence of air current doesn’t mean absence of air. Absence of Aether wind is not absence of Aether. No Aether wind? Aether attaches to and drag in equal speed with the interferometer, hence no fringe activities or Aether wind. Aether is an incompressible fluid that has no mechanical but electrical properties, such as e0 and u0 are measurable attributes of Aether. It ATTACHES to all matter enabling the coupling of E and B fields into vacuum space. It also attaches to matter to construct a gravity effect. Otherwise no Light or Gravity.

[@Mayank-mf7xr]

music at 4:00 really gets the blood going

[@mnada72]

Now it seems logical that the trajectory of projectile is parabola. This is like the apple fall as well as the moon

[@michaelawford7325]

Why was Kepler’s ant burnt at the steak

[@ieimagine]

Thank you!

[@boylaca123]

Không hiểu

[@djredrover]

All I want in this world is to see how these students look like today!

[@5Andysalive]

there is a bit too much guesswork and assumptions on Kepplers mental and emotional life given the thin sources. Also Galileo was put on trial for a astrological prediction that went to far for the church. The heliocentricism became mixed in with it over time. That's actually quite complicated and confused everybody involved. Worth looking into. Which was btw highly controversial even within "the church" which was hardly a monolitic block with one opinion and no politics or arguments.

[@csanilkumar5415]

Kepler's law are only assumption The difference between the Apogee and the perigee of the earth orbit is 5000000km. As per the Newtonian law gravitational force is inversely proportional to the squad distance. When the earth comes close to the sun gravitational force is more, when the earth goes 5000000km away from the sun the gravitational force is less. When an object want to escape from an orbit it wants to change its orbital velocity into escape velocity. For this change need extra force. There is no such non force present.

[@chrisoconnor6579]

Anyone else notice the large number of left handed students in the audience?

[@davidste60]

The video was probably flipped horizontally in those shots.

[@SFKelvin]

22!

[@buninparadise9476]

Beethoven in the thumbnail

[@tovahkaplan9222]

best of the inland northwest inlander 25th annual carvalhos journey jewish film showcase over the hedge

[@potatonoodlebear8035]

Tovah Kaplan ？

[@afonsodeportugal]

Tovah Kaplan Please, take your medication!

[@Mayank-mf7xr]

doing meth instead of math?

[@Loagun]

Sure, yes it is a part of history and western culture as it was the theory the scholars choose answered most of the problems of the previous Kepler chosen theory. -> I love how we title Newtown for solving the Kepler problem yet doing so resulted in the Newton Problem of having to solve the problem of gravity. And we're still waiting...

[@ieimagine]

Thank you !