Episode 3 : Long Range Fires

[@atifmajeed9962]

I am one of the guys who immediately watches the video as soon as it is launched.Huge fan of this guy has a very good observation of Chinese Forces.He is not anti Indian he is very patriotic and is warning Chinese threats.But Chinese will never take any piece of land from India.

[@amalchakrabarti2357]

Yes ,china will not take a piece of land . We have not lend money from them at the expense of territorial integrity and sovereignty.

[@Mubashirhassan-mf3qk]

Yes only changing British Empire unfolded legacies

[@anilpardhe6790]

Ha ha ha ha ................Lienese r worried about QUAD and they call it Asian NATO! AUKUS is the real Nightmare Trioca. Ha ha ha .......Porkis sold their body to Lienese and soul to Americans. Porki aavam crying hard with begging bowl and nobody is throwing a single penny to them. Modi captured the Indian Landscape and make in India recently crossed 1 Trillion dollar trade. Ha ha ha ............No more buyer here 4 Lienese and porki agenda.

[@adafridi]

Me too. Dont waste a sec.

[@amalchakrabarti2357]

@@Mubashirhassan-mf3qk what do you mean

[@bobogogo1671]

Indian Military has the answer ‼️ 56" Red eyes ‼️ This happened when Gobar and Gau Mutra has reached the brains since 2014 ‼️

[@amalchakrabarti2357]

Bro this guy is talking about a technological gap of 30 years . Narendra Modi is in power for 9 years . Before that the Congress was in power for all most all the time . Kol sahani have created this magazine in 2004-2005 . Before that he was in force as an artillery officer . What was he doing in army with so much intellectual property?

[@KobayashiMaru-]

@@amalchakrabarti2357 the Chinese have acquired major capabilities from 2016.. the doctrine was adopted in 2006

[@bobogogo1671]

@@amalchakrabarti2357 nobody can Defeat 56" Bhakts & their Lannd bhakti ‼️ not even Chinese 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@nirmalbhel3231]

Why you hate Hindu so much

[@bobogogo1671]

@@nirmalbhel3231 Telling Truth is hating Hindu ⁉️⁉️⁉️

[@umarfarooque3687]

30 years behind!

[@hussainzahid6526]

Now I understand the real threat from the Chinese side Wake up time for our side.. Thank You

[@itlearner1175]

I'm thrilled to see such an excellent series, and personally, I'm gaining a lot of knowledge from it. Thank you so much for creating and sharing this video. In my view, China, being India's biggest neighbor, and with both countries coexisting, I don't see why there would be any long-standing conflict between them. It wouldn't be beneficial for either nation's people, and only the West and the US would benefit from such a situation. I strongly believe that the leaders of both China and India are wise enough not to engage in a damaging and unnecessary conflict. Overall, this video has given me a lot to think about, and I'm looking forward to learning more.

[@SatpalVerma000]

India didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1860. Turkey didn't exist before 1914 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 16th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms. Turkey was created after the fall of the Ottomans empire. Dozens of countries were created based on nationalities after the fall of the Ottomans empire. Italy was created in 1860 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian nationality. Similarly, Germany was created in 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of German nationality. Similarly, all European countries were created based on nationalities. Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations. India was created out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example, English, French, Russian, Dutch, germans, Spanish, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations. There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations. Nations are Punjab Kashmir sindh Baluchistan gujarat Bengal Maharashtra tamilnadu etc. And in modern world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities. But India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions. Bangladesh was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971. Punjab should be a free country based on punjabi nationality like Bangladesh. But hindu Punjabis and Muslims punjabi don't want to leave india and Pakistan, so we Punjabi Sikhs can't force them to follow us. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Punjabi muslims of Pakistan dont support Punjabi nation state either. They support Pakistan state that is based on Islam religion. Similarly, Bengali Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and want to live in India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi muslims, Punjabi Hindus, and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to muslim Bengalis, who created Bangladesh (based on Bangla nation) without Indian bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims. As simple as that. We Punjabi Sikhs have no problem living in a Punjabi Muslims or Punjabi Hindu majority Punjabi nation state. The Punjabi speaker population of Muslims is around 10 crore. Punjabi speaking population of Hindus is around 3 crore (Punjabi Hindus in Punjab, Himchal, Haryana, Jammu and Delhi). Punjabi speaker Sikh population is around 2 crore. Hence Sikhs would be minority if both Punjabi muslims and Hindus or either one of them come form a Punjabi nation state with us Sikhs. But their radicals minds prefer religion over their nationality and they love to give up their Punjabi nationality and adopt Hindi and Urdu nationality in order to create a state based on their respective religions. So when Sikhs alone form a Punjabi nation state, it would automatically be a Sikh majority Punjabi nation state called Khalistan. What's in the name? You can name it whatever you want. But in practice it would be Khalistan just like India is a Hindu rashtra in practice regardless of its official name or regardless of its constitution.......

[@ikmixes4112]

Sir you from future, people will understand you after 30 years only

[@balur104]

Thank you to Dr Pravin Sawhney for great video

[@shaikhraisuddin4878]

"Remote Strike Warfare" is new paradigm

[@joem0088]

👍👍👍💯💯💯👍👍👍 Thank you !!

[@hbc511]

Isn't the hypersonic missile costly to produce? How much can they stock up on these missiles.

[@puggleski6097]

Precision sharpshooters in artillery based on spotter shooter concept, spotter being drone mounted. Drone absolutely indispensable in case of shadow zones in mountains and deep dense jungles like in the North East.

[@tjwatsonsoccer7945]

Very sharp mind. India is lucky for producing such a mind

[@amitabhshrivastava3121]

Are you kidding?? Pravin speaks round and round, says the same thing over and over, and does not come to any coherent point. A paid joker.

[@davidchang1827]

😮

[@fkbaber]

Very detailed analysis 👌

[@husnarabegum8482]

Your videos are very interesting

[@MAG_2371]

Can this be possible for you to upload a series how big was India since it's civilization how many countries emerged from India with there names and areas they are now and why can't we take stand as china taken no more humiliation one China

[@jimiz]

30 years!!!!!!!!! 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱

[@amalchakrabarti2357]

The guy forgot to talk about the large fleet of thousands of china made mig21 aircrafts

[@beluga9596]

Your writings and works have been fascinating. I personally like your lack of jingoism and criticism , taking detailed notes on this .

[@madhunainan4714]

Brilliant and detailed analysis! If possible, please analyse the military impact of Bhutan PM recent statement on Doklam. Thanks

[@indersingh4684]

Bhutan is immaterial...it will ever take a stand when things will heat up ...

[@aftabkhanize]

I am not a Military person. But I just enjoy listening to your talks and then understand why PLA invites you to their top most level programs. Appears India is destined not to benefit from your Knowledge. I am trying to phrase a question. Does the army set up inherited by India has some inherent obstructions where positions of higher responsibilities are required not to be humble before your subordinates and lend your ears to get some wisdom. I am sorry I can't express my point in a simple manner.

[@arunsen6868]

There can be no wars between India & China as long as parveen is alive . If parveen really want a war then this parveen has to pass away.

[@amalchakrabarti2357]

Right

[@mazeeshan]

Interesting

[@bobbygaad2023]

From Pakistan.... With respect Sawhney Sahab, as far as I understand, deep battle concept was established by Soviets for their particular battlefield realities and needs. e.g. Large armies, stretched over hundreds of miles with deep logistical ops, which could be exploited by concentrated and overwhelming combined arms operations both at the front and behind it. This requires huge expanses of favorable terrain and mostly mobile warfare with air superiority. Presently, a land battle between India and China across high mountains with very limited border objectives from both sides - (the dispute between both nations is a shallow border instead of a national ideological struggle) - precludes the possibility of this old concept. Isn't The notion of this two-front, full scale war with China is actually a ploy by the Indian military-industrial complex to siphon money from Indian exchequer? Logically speaking, China would never indulge itself in a full scale land battle for the sake of shallow border gains (the areas in dispute contain no significant mineral / strategic resources), which it can otherwise achieve by other limited means over time......Your kind comments sir?

[@bobbygaad2023]

Apropos my question above... Comparatively, the logistical equation for China in a war across high Himalayas due to the Tibetan Plateau is more complex than the one faced by the Indians. Terrain doesnt allow large maneuvering battles in the deep. But ironically the reach of IAF is limited against PLA's major CGs in the Tibetan region, even with SU30 / Brahmos combo (there is only a limited number of air launched brahmos units available necessitating very very selective use...)

[@amalchakrabarti2357]

@@bobbygaad2023 Bro all the sukhoi aircrafts are able to carry rudram anti radiation missile . Enough for anything they have including the export variant of s400 with compromised capabilities.

[@bobbygaad2023]

@@amalchakrabarti2357 thanks for the addendum. your point actually confirms my assertion that India vs China conflict is actually more of a border conflict (requiring shallow strikes and rapid actions) than a greater struggle (requiring deep battles on any belligerents' part.) Deep battles can't be fought in this particular case because of limited objectives and extremely difficult terrain precluding large maneuvers. Ergo, the need for appropriate level of air superiority deeper inside the enemy air space - using whatever combo of aircraft / weapons - will be 'unwarranted'. Hence, even in the case of a full time military escalation between India and China, the objectives would be limited requiring force concentrations on certain border points and their support areas immediately behind those points. So my point about limited reach of IAF (or PLAAF) wasn't about a particular weapon combo but more about the objectives and the terrain....But anyways, I was hoping for a reply from the expert Sawhney Sahab.... '

[@amalchakrabarti2357]

@@bobbygaad2023 Bobby last year india was the part of 48 international level military exercises including both bilateral and multilateral exercise . Ex air Marshall of pakistan air force Zaid Hamid is also under confusion like you over the India's active participation in so much military exercises . He posted a picture of beach landing by Indian forces in twitter and expressed his fear about the possible preparation of agrassion against Pakistan .please don't confuse regular friendly exercise with like minded countries or timely replacement of ageing equipment s as preparation of war .

[@charantk]

CI warfare has definitely made Indian army loose its focus, but hope it turns its weaknesses into strengths by some sensible people who are not cronies in the top brass.

[@ارسلانپٹھان-ف2خ]

Sir today 3 indian missiles misfired

[@babaabrar.191]

Sane person ... A well researched and well crafted knowledgeable update as always ... From Jammu and kashmir

[@lifestylemaster6186]

What we can understand you are nothing but a joker from bhikaristan barking here without knowing any facts, go and feed your country people

[@sssaaa4177]

Sir, why stopped Hindi version.

[@zahidumar6805]

Top man

[@read7641]

Smart man

[@shahidqureshi4708]

Indian mind set is governed by political leaders . With Indian politicians , good relationship with China & Pakistan is out of question .

[@zaffazad4040]

Thanks for doing this part of the program, Dr. Sawhney. The future wars are network-centric, but listening to the top Indian military leadership sometimes does not reflect if they know the challenges they face on the Northern border. Modern wars are planned, executed and analyzed in the cloud, not on the LAC, man to man and machine to machine. Modern thought is the key to achieving these objectives. However, the current Indian top military leadership lacks the clarity of thought and the vision to change their training and war concepts from the 20th century to the present day. Unfortunately, the leadership in Delhi is more interested in boosting its image rather than putting efforts into understanding challenges on the Northern Border, LAC etc. The Indian MEA and NSA cannot analyze what they are dealing with; Foreign Minister's job is not to manage the crisis; his job is to comprehend the possible challenges and avoid those before they become a problem for the country; Mr. Jaishankar has failed India in managing LAC crisis. Mr. Doval's disastrous input in revoking 370 has led China to do what it did in Ladakh, exposing the shallowness of Indian military leadership, its preparedness and management of a crisis. A country needs to have the brain power and physical infrastructure to manufacture relevant chips, the brain power to design sensor suits, program these and design algorithms/software to collect data, analyze, plan, execute and get real-time feedback for further action in an electromagnetic domain. Unfortunately, although Mr. Modi's focus is how to deal with his image boosting at home and abroad, the current Indian political leadership lacks the vision, capacity and understanding of what they are dealing with and what they have put India on the US lap, creating an imaginary foe on the Northern border that will cost a couple of trillion dollars to deal with in the next twenty years. It's unfortunate. Indeed, the political elements are so political in Delhi that no leadership can create an environment of trust that is a prerequisite to the liberation of thought, a pre-cursor for innovation and scientific development that is required to develop technology for a cyber-space and cloud-based, network-centric technologies to operationalize a modern war strategy. And that is ware down the adversary's network and communication system before it can even think about launching the akinetic strike, a missile etc.

[@Red.bulldozer3]

Production of long range missilles and drones are very critical for modern warfare as shown by russian ukraine war. Even a super power like russia running out of missiles and drones. Now it started buying from Iran ,north korea and may be china, Although india has some missiles , the production is slow and cannot cope up intense all out war with china

[@nayanmalig]

Just before WE 2 Russians bought tank gun turrets from Germany but the Russians were secretly building better gun turrets. This gave the wrong impression to Hitler that Russia was weak. When Germans cut off the supply of turrets to Russia they thought they can just walk into Russia and takeover.

[@nayanmalig]

WW 2

[@agonnoga6100]

You've hit the nail on the head. The first shots will not be fired in air, land or sea but in space and cyberspace where our communication network will be taken out. We have nothing to protect our assets in space. China has a space station which will be used for military purposes. The last but not the least is economic warfare where China has a staggering 101 billion dollars trade surplus with India. Our companies are merely selling Chinese goods under their brand leading to such enormous trade deficit. In other words, we are paying for China's rise and dominance.

[@Jagira554]

Sir I am following your analysis on capability building in new trends in war fighting with India 🇮🇳, pak and china 🇨🇳 in focus, while I agree with your assessment of flawed priorities of indian defence forces when it it comes to fine tuning and reviewing the art of war and capability building… but I think the assessment of Chinese (PLA) capabilities may not be beyond capability demonstrating stage .

[@NasirKhan-fx8hq]

Chinese are 30 years ahead in defence technology and their capabilities to take Indian defence forces at their will is very scary. Present government is only interested in winning elections and checking their opposition but totally ignoring the seriousness of adversaries.

[@KobayashiMaru-]

Very well said, the agenda is of domestic politics not national interest

[@nassermj7671]

​@@KobayashiMaru- Big of you to acknowledge that. I fear his historic legacy may not be so kind

[@amalchakrabarti2357]

Rakshamantri rajnath singh have cleared that india will buy weapons worth of 100 billion dollars over the next 5_10 years . How much new Weapon was purchased between the time span 2004-2014?

[@KobayashiMaru-]

@@amalchakrabarti2357 One has to watch Colonel ( retd ) Sawhney's video a couple of times to understand what he is trying to convey, only old timers or serving soldiers will grasp its true meaning .. hats off to Colonel Sawhney , on his trying to educate the uninitiated. An unenviable task indeed

[@amalchakrabarti2357]

@@KobayashiMaru- Bro i am living beside one of the oldest ordinance factory of india . Historically defence ministry officials are playing the role of management and veterans are playing the role of workers and supervisor in such kind of organisation.

[@pradeeps95]

Some good points Praveen ji, but still seems a rather one-sided view of only strengths of China. Hard to comprehend that Indian military has no alternatives or plans to deal with PLA. If that is the case what are the Chinese waiting for?

[@spade1974]

the chinese are waiting for the destruction of US military first and if successful ,it has only to demand india hand over AP otherwise india will be next?

[@KayyHong]

China is not interested to take over India and be responsible to feed, house and educate its impoverished citizens. China only want to regain areas they believe belong to them. China is willing to negotiate but India is encouraged by the U.S. to reject negotiation.

[@ImranKhan-ty6mx]

Your shirts are amazing! Are they Indian? I had a very poor opinion of Indian sense of colors and style when wearing western clothing. But Parveen Saheb has such a great selection of shirts. Maybe you should offer those for sale as a source of income, but also to promote Indian products. ❤ from 🇵🇰

[@mozart4128]

These shirts he bought from Landa Bazar of Lahore

[@ImranKhan-ty6mx]

@@mozart4128 did you get your used mobile from Chand Bagh?

[@SatpalVerma000]

He's not Indian, he's Punjabi. But hindu Punjabis have given up their freedom and nationality for the sake of Hindu country just like you muslim Pakistani Punjabi? That's why his dressing sense is better than Indians. Does it make sense? NO? wait

[@SatpalVerma000]

India didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1860. Turkey didn't exist before 1914 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 16th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms. Turkey was created after the fall of the Ottomans empire. Dozens of countries were created based on nationalities after the fall of the Ottomans empire. Italy was created in 1860 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian nationality. Similarly, Germany was created in 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of German nationality. Similarly, all European countries were created based on nationalities. Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations. India was created out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example, English, French, Russian, Dutch, germans, Spanish, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations. There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations. Nations are Punjab Kashmir sindh Baluchistan gujarat Bengal Maharashtra tamilnadu etc. And in modern world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities. But India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions. Bangladesh was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971. Punjab should be a free country based on punjabi nationality like Bangladesh. But hindu Punjabis and Muslims punjabi don't want to leave india and Pakistan, so we Punjabi Sikhs can't force them to follow us. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Punjabi muslims of Pakistan dont support Punjabi nation state either. They support Pakistan state that is based on Islam religion. Similarly, Bengali Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and want to live in India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi muslims, Punjabi Hindus, and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to muslim Bengalis, who created Bangladesh (based on Bangla nation) without Indian bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims. As simple as that. We Punjabi Sikhs have no problem living in a Punjabi Muslims or Punjabi Hindu majority Punjabi nation state. The Punjabi speaker population of Muslims is around 10 crore. Punjabi speaking population of Hindus is around 3 crore (Punjabi Hindus in Punjab, Himchal, Haryana, Jammu and Delhi). Punjabi speaker Sikh population is around 2 crore. Hence Sikhs would be minority if both Punjabi muslims and Hindus or either one of them come form a Punjabi nation state with us Sikhs. But their radicals minds prefer religion over their nationality and they love to give up their Punjabi nationality and adopt Hindi and Urdu nationality in order to create a state based on their respective religions. So when Sikhs alone form a Punjabi nation state, it would automatically be a Sikh majority Punjabi nation state called Khalistan. What's in the name? You can name it whatever you want. But in practice it would be Khalistan just like India is a Hindu rashtra in practice regardless of its official name or regardless of its constitution..........

[@sunnyIndian8519]

Do you have any solutions sir...why are you not explaining them.

[@rashidsarwarsyed]

A very nice analysis

[@amalchakrabarti2357]

Probably not . According to let cds gen rawat at the end of the day it's the boots on the ground that matters . The guy is talking lot of things about the war doctrines of America and russia .just see what's happened with usa in Afghanistan or what is happening with the Russians in Ukraine with all kind of technological advantages they have . Ukrainian are continuing their battle even after 6000 missile strikes .

[@harindersingh-kc1ei]

Me too

[@billlin9656]

If India can have a good relationship with China, it will be win-win case, why not?

[@bdh2564]

Too bad that this gentleman has few Indian hindu subscribers, they must not like to hear those hard truths. I notice mostly only comments from muslims to his videos

[@shokivarma7134]

Most of the us are taken up by the main line media's view that we are invincible.

[@deepakseth6256]

I have been watching for a long time Mr Sawhney dishing out distorted views of Geo Politics . Please note the following . India China border dispute long Pre dates America China discord . India China dispute is independent of America China problem. Yes India needs America to safe guard it's borders and Amarica needs India to safe guard it's Super Power status. True India and Amarica are at the two ends of the Globe but they have much in common . On the other hand China Pakistan have nothing in common . Only thing that they have in common is their desire to keep India down

[@damodargautam754]

Catching up China take 50 years for India. By the time Chine will another 50 year ahead. Therefore forget about other, take your people out of poverty and let them realise they are culturally rich.

[@indersingh4684]

I hope India Army chief see this vedio...and more importantly Mr Ajit Dovel and PM ...couse I am dam scared after this info....not because China is stronger .....but because our Army is under prepared and on top of it wrongly focused due to out dated war doctrine....India should have checked China once it entered Tibet ...British always keept Tibet as buffer zone ......In light of above info it seems for India best bet is that US /NETO subdews / weakens China....or some good sence prevails in China leadership to not to push India to war ...and rather promote peace ...after all India is very good and large market for Chinese products ....India is like hen giving Golden eggs ....then why kill it ....

[@dipongkamei]

sIR this is not your expert area.....what you are saying is demoralization

[@Red.bulldozer3]

Then who is the expert? You?

[@ytadltspv]

i know - he should be bleating - 'sab changa si'

[@nirmalbhel3231]

Sino-India war... if it is short local war, less than a month then India can hold China. BUT is it is long war, more than 6 month then China has an edge. Both India & China will not use long range missiles or nukes.

[@Red.bulldozer3]

Get the facts first before commenting on the indo china war. In a short war of less than one month , india lost Aksai chin (40000 sq km) and whole of arunachaal pradesh. But later chinese withdraw from arunachal pradesh because of some strategic reasons. China still holds aksai chin where it built highway going to pakistan and xinjiang. Now china wants to expand into ladakh as well

[@nirmalbhel3231]

@@Red.bulldozer3 India never lost Aksai Chin. Indian Army was never there. When Brits left India, China slowly moved in and occupied the empty land. Nehru didn't pat attention to defense after 1947... and India paid a heavy cost. Arunachal Pradesh... don't know how much you know, some part of Arunachal (NEFA), Uttarakhnd are still under Chinese control. When it was told to Nehru that Chinese have encroached our territory, he told Army to move forward till we rack Mc. Mahon line and angered China and China attacked both areas. Under US pressure, China moved back. China even told Pak to attack and take Kashmir... it is still a puzzle why Pak didn't do at time (may be US pressure) but did 3 yrs after. What China wants... they want Tawang so that they can connect Lahsa and Tawang. What India should do... India should forget Aksai Chin (let China have G215), give Tawang to China and bargain for Mansarovar amd Kailash, which is a part of India.

[@Red.bulldozer3]

@@nirmalbhel3231 if the indian army was never in aksai chin which is part of northern ladakh then why india claims it belong to her?

[@sharadpandey8571]

He is simply implying china attacking the electricity grid, aviation because india lags the artificial intelligence. In man to man combat indian army is far more superior. He is simply showing the weakness, We should be grateful even if he is opinionated.

[@nirmalbhel3231]

@@Red.bulldozer3 Agreement between British and Govt. of Tibet called Mc. Mahon line. China don't accept this after invading Tibet. Aksai Chin, India's Uttarakhand, Nepal, Sikkin, Bhutan was a part of Xian dynasty, 1000 years ago called 7 sisters and China wants them back

[@Nagpadawala]

Indian's stuck on ramayana

[@santhugowda7179]

Still you have not answered my question.😆😆😆😆😆 When Nancy palosi visited Taiwan country why Chinese radar , electric magic sorry magamtic pulse, technology did not work. 😆😆😆😆😆😆

[@huzaifanaveed3410]

1st

[@kaizerrajrahman3020]

No I was first

[@sshray1115]

⭐⭐ barring precious few, most of 25 mins spent on anecdotal opinionated story telling. Imp time stamps: 14:54 Creating the autonomy at rest

[@sobant4795]

Sir kindly upload videos more frequently so that u can use to youtube algorithm to reach more audience......there is much more war/diplomatic/strategic content out there for u to make atleast 3 videos a week...thanks

[@hamidraza2948]

Sir, u know what happened with 3 Brahmos Missiles today in army training? If u read my comment than plz make a video on Brahmos,

[@nirmalbhel3231]

They are not BrahMos, they are 50 years old Russian shortrange SAM. Army randomly tests these, sometime they miss fire. Army is replacing them with QRSAM. BrahMos is SSM or SAM and one of the World's best

[@amitabhshrivastava3121]

Pravin speaks round and round, says the same thing over and over, and does not come to any coherent point. A paid joker.