EQ Comparison - Tube Tech vs Behringer - Software vs Hardware

[@MOOTANT1]

Info: KZbin had added copyright notes because I was seemingly using a song from an artist called Mobb Deep. This is incorrect. The drum loop is from a very old and rare sample pack from the 90's It is Mobb Deep who used a loop taken from someone else's track.

[@iampuesa]

I feel that the boosts on the plugin sound as something added to the sound whereas on KT boosts sound like the part of the sound. I notice this on the transients the most. Both sound usable though.

[@producermind9030]

Not volume matched. I know you tried but 1db makes a difference. The Gain match vst would have been really helpful here. They both sound good though. Definitely not the same but useable.

[@chrislyth9813]

Great content Chris - Informative and entertaining.

[@MOOTANT1]

Thx namesake. They were good times Lyth :)

[@iankelly49]

I think the Q's must be quite different on each unit, which may explain why matching is quite hard.

[@teabeforesleep3010]

thanks for this

[@piotr803]

10:00 TubeTech has more high end but Klark is smoother, less harsh/digital.11:20 yeah, Klark has the same sound almost but it’s punchier.

[@jovantrendmaker4722]

On the finnal left is more natural its breathing and has some "air" to it. I like it more bit the differences are suttle really.

[@jmizzbeatsj-jigga7888]

swab the ubes and do a update