The Science of Precognition | Dr. Julia Mossbridge

[@aclearlight]

A marvelous interview with a very original thinker. Thank you!

[@aclearlight]

A wonderful, rich interview! I very much enjoyed Dr. Mossbridge's unique perspectives and the boldness of her views. Her answer on free will was especially interesting to me, though I do continue to be impressed by the implications of Benjamin Libet's "free won't" experiments. Also, whether we demonstrably possess free will or not, I believe it is absolutely in evrryone's best interest to pay fierce attention to the moment and to greet life under the optimistic assumption, becoming a duty even, that a mindful attitude of possessing freewill underlies the mission of living a forthright and profitably examined life. Without focus, reflection and a felt responsibility to learn from the consequences of our choices, what are we?

[@JuliaMossbridge]

Totally agree with all of these ideas. And thank you for your kind words!

[@_WeDontKnow_]

I love the experiments where they're able to show precognition by completely bypassing the attention and going straight to the subconscious, I think it's genius. Our rational thinking is very useful, but tends to get in the way when we're trying to access our more subtle ways of perceiving.

[@JuliaMossbridge]

I love your username! Says it all.

[@lucyhanks500]

@@JuliaMossbridgep recognition by meta-tagging Armitage Shanks? A lady in B&M today offered me a screwdriver… how did she know my dog had only a few days before chewed the wire on my drill charger? She must have been be psychic in some sense. Mind the 18 stone man on the till wearing lipstick & makeup whilst stretching his shoulders for a fight, was rather shocking…I suppose I should have taken the dendrite que and offered him a screwdriver for his requirements. I don’t think the labelling system of quantum physics & quantum mechanics appears to recognise notions correctly; it’s like the electrical dendrite activity is covertly pointing to where pathogens need to aim an attack. The process isn’t quite as magical as the skills of telekinesis Matilda can notion & actualize, but I suppose some people get a sense of status & office when they’ve got something to doo.

[@lucyhanks500]

I’ve learned that the mean of the populace does not have the ability to weigh & measure fact and reason, from emotion, selfishness and projection of their shadow self. It’s considered a local norm for members of the general public to appoint themselves in the role of judge & juror, measuring any available information from any source and consequently mitring out their notions for punishments and uptaking the role of decisive slave owner over the circumstances & future of their slave; this is all done under the title ‘helping a lowly person’, or ‘marginalising a lowly person’, dependent on how much their help is appreciated or welcome as a community of ‘we’s’, which seemingly appear to grow socially & epiphyticly from their communal power to make decisions over someone else’s life & circumstances. It’s almost like magic…the slave doesn’t even need to be conferred with directly at any point in life during this process and can even find itself thrown into a hole of the abyss when the demand for power & social skills has waned, or the supply has been rendered obsolete by over consumption, commonality or out of date-ness. And of course without help of the powerful it would find itself in destitutional dependency, maybe even Stockholm syndrome to abusers who violate its psychological boundaries and human respect on a daily basis and allow its selfish self to be violated on demand and even dispense compliments for the generosity and altruism it’s received throughout its lifetime in earth, exposed to elemental forces, notions, values & beliefs. You could even be lucky enough to be offered the role of servicing their husband, after doing the cleaning, ironing and before taking up their children’s dirty laundry. I suppose I’m lucky I can’t drive, or I might be asked to supply a chauffeur experience to and from their visits to the pub and the shopping centre department store changing rooms. After all them required skills to fit the role, there might even be opportunities as a personal stylist and counsellor to the whole family, to help negate all the damages they’ve sustained throughout their life & history.

[@darbylettick3008]

The story of understanding the "FLOW" is a big step. Seeing the past and present as a bigger picture that Wii fit into is amazingly reassuring in hard times. I fell 12' feet onto a concrete floor today between watching this video. I landed with a 2x4 across my back where I broke it at 2 1/2 years old that caused my lifelong scoliosis. My hip hit the concrete, tears in my skin where blood would flow, I sat up thanking God for letting Mii survive a fall at 69 that could have killed mii off from this world by breaking my machine. Once more my Angels stepped in and I survived with a man looking on who had just joked that he would catch me as I climbed over a ledge 18 feet above him. Everything is supposed to happen and Wii learn, time when you are falling backwards to the concrete floor is different than when I have been traveling out of body or having fun in the Flow of creating things like Darbys Canyon. Whew. Great timng for coming back to meditate on these things, give thanks, and have my sweetheart show up to nurse my wounds and advise mii to consider caution one day.

[@javadhashtroudian5740]

My academic background is chemistry, biochemistry, neurochemistry, clinical hypnotherapy. I have been a software engineer including AI for many years. I have practiced altered states of consciousness research for 57 years using psychedlics, meditation, hypnosis, active imagination and similar techniques. I have personally experienced a few psi phenomena including precognition. I think time may have more than one dimension (equivalent to multiverse). What I don't know is if my few very strong recognizing events have been the present affecting the future or the future affecting the past. Altogether since Ultimate Reality is One everythingvrhat is was will be is already there as the canvas described. Thank you for a wonderful talk.

[@surrendertoflow78]

I absolutely loved this interview. I’m so glad you are looking at this evidence. It’s maddening to me when it’s ignored (in almost all other cases). I feel like we’re wasting our time when all of this evidence isn’t included in our models first and foremost! Bravo again!

[@aclearlight]

@@surrendertoflow78 Very well said! Until and unless physics recognizes the imperative to address the full range of measureable phenomena in the world, it's going to remain hobbled and myopic at best, -- and more like wrong-headed and irrelevant, a Roomba stuck in the corner, at less-than-best.

[@javadhashtroudian5740]

Any cognitive scientist experiencing psychedelics understands notamal consciousness is highly filtered. As to why: Ultimate Reality is so full of bliss that life would be impossible unfiltered. On my second acidvtrip I cut a peach and looked at it. It was so beautiful I could never eat it.

[@luluwebdesign7854]

Fabulous conversation - thank you!

[@darkmatter6714]

Imagine time is more like a still lake than a flowing river. Everything that ever was, is and will be are all there in the form of the water in the lake. The notion of past, present and future as well as the notion of what is, was and will be then becomes an abstract concept because, it’s already physically all there. Then imagine you’re a fish in the middle of the lake (the present), but a special kind of fish that can only swim forward. You can’t experience the water ahead of you because you haven’t got there yet, but that doesn’t mean that the water ahead doesn’t exist - you just can’t see it. And you remember the water behind you, but you can’t swim back to it because you’re not built that way, so for you it’s in the past, but that water behind you is still there. I believe the key to it all lies in consciousness. Like the fish in the lake, our consciousness can only tap into the present. I believe a higher level of consciousness - or an unshackled version of our current consciousness - would be like a fish that can swim forward, backward and jump out of the water to get an aerial view of the lake ahead as well as the lake behind at the same time.

[@Meditation409]

This video is an AWESOME way to start my weekend!!! 👊👊😃😃❤️

[@jimmykelly2809]

I’ve had precognition multiple times in my life. I know it’s real but it’s hard to get actual provable data except the last time it happened. I had 3 witnesses and I described the place with details BEFORE we set out to the place. It was so compelling to the 2 that were there that it freaked them out. The other person was my fiancé and she knew of my precognition. It is real there is no doubt about it. I’d like to be a part of a study but my precognition is random and always comes in forms of dreams. My dreams a lot of the times including last night are seeing life through someone else’s eyes and feelings but other times it’s me in the future.

[@jericosha2842]

I love this channel so much.

[@Soma_3046]

Maybe we should think of time as a river. From far above there is a standstill. But if you descend and look closer, you will see that the river is in motion and flows in one direction. Perhaps you can imagine every single moment as a drop in this river that is both a wave and a particle.

[@Littlewing.]

And no matter how you look at it, you can’t push a river….✨✨

[@epicchannel4724]

This life isn't real. It's an artificial game played by the actual living beings. They actually like being frustrated that they cannot remember the core until they go back.

[@darkmatter6714]

It’s a good analogy but it’s still rooted in linearity. The most cutting-edge thinking on time is that it’s non-linear. To try and use your water analogy, imagine time is more like a still lake than a flowing river. Everything that ever was, is and will be are all there in the form of the water in the lake. The notion of past, present and future then becomes an abstract concept because, it’s all already there. Then imagine you’re a fish in the middle of the lake (the present), but a special kind of fish that can only swim forward. You can’t experience the water ahead of you because you haven’t got there yet, but that doesn’t mean that the water ahead doesn’t exist - you just can’t see it. And you remember the water behind you, but you can’t swim back to it because you’re not built that way, so for you it’s in the past, but that water behind you is still there. I believe the key to it all lies in consciousness. Like the fish in the lake, our consciousness can only tap into the present. I believe a higher level of consciousness - or an unshackled consciousness - would be like a fish that can swim forward, backward and jump out of the water to get an aerial view of the lake ahead and behind at the same time.

[@Soma_3046]

@@darkmatter6714 That's basically what I want to express. We are the drops and at the same time wave and particle. That means there has to be a way to see the bigger picture since we belong to both. Viewed from a great height, the situation is as stagnant as in a lake. Where does the river originate? ;) A drop from the ocean.

[@darkmatter6714]

@@Soma_3046 Yes. And the ocean is what’s fundamental - it’s what spawns the river/lake. And It’s looking as if consciousness is what’s fundamental - spawning the universe and all the matter within it.

[@DavidBruce]

This interview was quite helpful and entertaining. On the path where we are in these bodies, we experience time linearly, but experience has shown me that there is another possibility for other thinking beings exist outside of this realm, and it's the only way to explain certain phenomenon, precognition, seeing from another being's perspective, being in the right place at the right time. I think I'll have to rewatch this again to make sure I followed all your (Dr. Mossbridge) points, because I had to pause it periodically to take the dog I'm watching outside. In any case, I'm a fan. After learning about Federico Faggin's theory of consciousness, this seemed like an appropriate exploration. As far as free will, I do think we have it, because we are intermittently being prodded or guided towards more gentle relationships with the earth and universe to preserve our very future.

[@JuliaMossbridge]

I'm a fan of your dog!

[@basirbita]

I cannot understand why do people (basically scientists) call the capability of seeing the "future" a "pre"cognition, which means prior to something, while in ancient Persian and ancient Egypt, it was an advanced method. Given the time is a spectrum of perception, observation within human cognitive capacity, in this context, "pre" might also indicate seeing another point of spectrum before others can see that point. A form of magical and shamanistic potential that gets unfold. As usual, a heart uplifting, thought-inducing, and mind-buggling video. Thank you

[@brulsmurf]

Prove that it exist. Collect nobel price.

[@seditt5146]

The reason is because all attempts to prove it fail miserably. MAYBE she finally found a way but these sorts of studies always come to the forefront with great fan fair only to age like spoiled milk and all other researchers always fail at replication. Hope this helps you understand why its frowned on. When your hopes are shattered over and over and over with null results you start to feel perhaps it really does not exist.

[@goldwhitedragon]

@@seditt5146 Failed to SCIENTIFICALLY prove it.

[@davecros4887]

@@basirbita relative to how the human mind perceives time, pre would just signify that the mind’s awareness of an event in the relative future is perceived. But yes, time is a perception and the mind of god perceives all time, forward and backward and all things in the Universe as now.

[@MasoudJohnAzizi]

Sharing an observation: "Thinking with your heart" = cognition based on a locus of identity rooted in the right hemisphere of the brain (per terminology of Dr. Iain McGilchrist).

[@theone306]

Excellent interview ❤ Thank you 🙏

[@moormanjean5636]

I have personally built up an in-depth and intuitive understanding of the brain from the neuron to the circuit to the systems level. I understand why neurons generalize, how circuits are organized, and how attention, memory, and abstraction operate. It does in fact let you know a lot, actually kinda makes you go a little crazy once you start to self-analyze. Still i agree that a reductionist mindset is limited and i do not discount so called supernatural phenomena. Most importantly I think, the hard problem of consciousness CAN be answered by neuroscience. Specifically, the problem at hand is whether the brain can be responsible for consciousness, which unlike our mechanistic descriptions of the brain is in actuality a very cohesive experience wherein we possess free will, something which should be impossible in a reductionistic worldview. The reality is we do have free will, we are not simple automatons instead we are beings whose functioning contains a radical open-endedness, an irreducible freedom built-in to us at the deepest level. How can seemingly disjoint neural regions perfectly coordinate together to allow for a cohesive experience throughout life? How can we have free will in a mechanistic universe? The answer to both questions is the same phenomena. Individual neurons self-align their behavior with frequencies of quantum field corresponding to you, i.e., your soul. Like iron atoms in a magnet, neurons across the brain can align along quantum frequencies, enabling a cohesive experience while allowing for radical freedom in the nondeterministic quantum computations. The way neurons actually align quantum mechanically has to do with harmonic benzene rings, which recent research shows can occur in biophysical conditions. Roger penrose and others have advocated this quantum theory of consciousness if you are interested.

[@anika_h]

We have free will? We chose our ethnicity, gender, religion, nationality, parents, birth order, the socioeconomic stances we were born into etc?

[@donnied6151]

The interview was great and just loved the host.

[@Freer07]

The hedge behind you is indeed a great visual, and deepened my attention at a certain point. Enjoying this video, so insightful , thank you ❤

[@beherenowspace1863]

Wonderful. Loved this. More from Julia please.

[@darbylettick3008]

Wow! at about 33 minutes in you grabbed my attention... Bosons can affect Fermions... the photons that I emit with my DHA in my eyes which lets me dissolve clouds in a few short breaths to demonstrate how our intention can be impactful far beyond the measures of time for the distance and reaction time of the clouds, how they dissolve for mii, that I can describe in advance to those I am demonstrating to suddenly locks into place. I affect the BZ bonds and let an elephant worth of water disappear as vapor dispersed through this very mechanism. Water responds to water grounded through my bare or leathered feet to free up ions I can channel to clouds to reverse their polarity, their charge, from afar. Distance is irrelevant. It is not precognition for I can let others pick a cloud an still alter it. Facinating discussion.

[@seaoceanme]

Fascinating talk by amazing people. Many thanks.

[@daamour]

Thank you. This is helpful to help me understand my precognitive experiences.

[@judygreenwell334]

The ‘observer’ can be an ‘unseen entity’ present along side a human - or, it can be the ‘consciousness’ of an entity or entities who reside ‘within’ a human or ‘outside’ the human acting as a ‘puppeteer’.

[@VeryStupid4547]

Fascinating

[@262ivanh]

That makes sense

[@darbylettick3008]

As I would plan my life from the end to the beginning in a role during this holographic experience. Time is sliced into very thin layers and indeed, to talk with our younger self is one of our ways to understand helping yourself out in these ways. I do believe this is true and have done it too. My book was a revelation to Mii when I wrote the chapter of Old Darby going back in time to talk to his younger self and thus help form the future that Wii are part of creating. So fine to hear this perspective from a scientific minded person. Kudos. Great articulation of these thoughts that are my life work animating for these times ahead.

[@inedex]

Fascinating. I am familiar with Robert Sapolsky's work showing that there is no free will. I am sure to certain degree that's true. There is mechanistic part to the choices we make, including biochemical factors. On the other hand, I do not think that is one only truth, it is not absolute. I am familiar with NDE cases where higher beings consistently refer to both #1 future events (i.e. world has already been calculated) and #2 free will of human beings which seems to be sacred. It is consistently shown that those beings limit knowledge about future events for a soul in order to allow true free choice. Now, they might give a hint about several possible "timelines" (again, those events have already been calculated) which are the result of choices of this particular or other souls. If a choice is made hugely due to subconscious motivations, and those in fact are connected to the life plan goals of particular soul, then it becomes question of definition of free will (conscious vs subconscious).

[@moormanjean5636]

Robert's work does not prove their is no free will, he simply points out that brain activity occurs prior to choice, which if you think about it is self-evident yet insufficient to prove the existence or lack of free will. Sapolsky clearly has a reductionist world view, which leads him to presuppose the lack of free will, and so this colors his interpretation of the workings of the brain. His work does not preclude that the actual computation that this preemptive neural activity represents is itself radically open-ended, which recent work on quantum effects in neuron microtubules suggests.

[@inedex]

@@moormanjean5636 you probably know his work better than I do. Yeah I agree. Thanks for mentioning microtubules, that might be missing link between physical matter and quantum effects/soul.

[@aquaram1111]

Dr. Ray Peat (biologist) talked about the brain as a filter, serotonin being the key component, and the explanation of why psychedelics lower the filter by reducing the action of serotonin when the they plug into/hog up its receptors.

[@alliecat.3]

Yes, Ladies, I awoke about three weeks ago. If you meditate enough, you will realize that your brain is an antenna, and your eyes are VR glasses. We live in this world because we want to know ourselves better, to experience our senses, and to love and enjoy life. Thank goodness our consciousness is starting to evolve.

[@mountainpeakcreations2964]

Seeking truth beyond human experience 3 dimentions of space and one of time. Time and Space are not fundamental, but consciousness is.

[@rioapril7045]

A truly independent thinker. Super interesting person!

[@innerlight617]

Very interesting interview! 1.07.16: "Yes, the Universe has free will.." I am struggling with this. To me, the Universe doesn't have a will. It behaves how it behaves, because it is what it is.

[@Thurnishaley6969]

Its will is free precisely because it is what it is and acts only upon a predetermined set of ways which express this consistency of self. Bernardo says free will and determinism are the same thing

[@innerlight617]

@@Thurnishaley6969 yes it is true, he has said that...

[@phantomhawk01]

The universe is an expression in consciousness, it's will is to be everything it is. From our point of view it feels like we have free will. When nature is what it is and we are that, so who's will is it?

[@gingerhipster]

Great chat. It sure looks like there's something like an undiscovered antenna paradigm where the physical forms of conscious life intersect with an undiscovered system of reality where some of the energy and information of mind exists.

[@darbylettick3008]

The Book of Wibblry and WUB that was started a half-century ago manifests in pieces that come together over the decades to go from fantasy to reality through life I could not imagine possible. Suicide is not an option when you are fated to the alignment and a plan that Wii agree to long before the measure of time begins. I love the analogy and articulation of this interview. At 69, it is not the same view; perspicuity is the key to understanding that synchronicity is more than just chance. Fate does indeed appear to exist, or there could not be precognition. So many questions come with so many answers but I love the exercises that ensue once such views are integrated in as science comes to reflect what some of us have felt and lived for half a century or more. Kudos to getting this out to the world. Wii need that to help us feel more secure in our instinct, our actions, our construction of the solutions that will be needed when these times finally arrive. Blessings to your works. (audio and musical tunes of Wibblyr and WUB are on YT that tell a tale much as you describe, written long before you started studying it. Life is good.

[@morphixnm]

This is a mechanistic idea about free will, as if it comes down to acting in the moment on binary choices. When we deliberate and think things through and make moral choices, the comparisons and evaluations are where we especially make our own determinations.

[@estherbenzaquen8120]

Most philosophers and scientists doubt that there is such a thing as free will. What makes me doubt these statements is to compare them with history and society. Freedom has been one of the most demanded things. Also, societies in which freedoms exist are more prosperous and livable than those in which the culture is more deterministic and has no options.

[@darbylettick3008]

Good saying, Ride the train to the station... One station that seems to indicate there are answers to be found at the end of the line. All roads may indeed lead to One truth.

[@kempzel1]

I love these interviews. On the question of free will, I came away confused. Is she saying we don’t have ultimate free will, or that the entire experience of free will is essentially an illusion? I agree we have much less free will than we believe, but still have some form of volition, even if it’s just one of many levers being pulled to influence our behavior.

[@surrendertoflow78]

Oh I left my comment before getting to the end. PLEASE interview Heinrich Päs regarding Everett and the so-called many worlds interpretation. Apparently we’re almost all wrong about what Everett was actually trying to say (someone else coined his theory as “many-worlds”, not him). His work before he was pressured to change it to please the dogma of his mentors was *really* about a unified entangled whole. The many worlds part of it has more to do with our limited perception than with the reality. Please please please please have him on to explain this misunderstanding and the history of how it came to be. Please read his book “The One” about the unified whole.

[@jamesgoettsche8041]

@ 32:55 By "observer" she means measurement. We can observe without judging or quantifying. But that introduces the "measurement problem", which all but a few physicists will gloss over. If we're ever going to make progress in this area we need to speak clearly and accurately

[@jamesgoettsche8041]

What does that say about the common Christian idea, "Judge not that ye be judged", in quantum physics, "measure not that ye be measured", or if you will, "particle not that ye be particled"

[@mountainpeakcreations2964]

Yes, it's one conciouuseness and everything is connected. I know it as past present and future all happen in the present. I know it in mathmatics and physics.. it is in the words as sound. It's transending the senses or going beyond the mind and body. As she mentions, it's a precocetion state or prior to birth.

[@LizafromWhere]

What do I think about it? Same as Dr Julia-stop thinking with the Small I. Small I has no free will. But if you belive you are one with the universe in a physical disassociated state you know that you have free will. EGO EGO EGO keeps you small, lonely, separated and keeping on asking foolish questions and refusing to see the big picture.

[@christoft5468]

Thank-you

[@seth956]

We have free will. We just aren't aware of who we are fully. Uncoucious is just as much me as what we call consciousness. We are a system of cooperating "intelligences." We already know the information we are attempting to gather, but it's as if the RAM of the computer is asking the hardrive for more information than it can handle. Hardrive(unconscious) will not intentionally cause the computer(body) to crash(seize). When you look for something that isn't lost, give up, and it is found. When we split our identity and environment into pieces to understand due to our limitations, we must remember to put the pieces back together after we're finished. The universe doesn't share our limitations.

[@patsybenveniste7515]

Thanks!

[@RebeccaFoster-r4k]

Hello, please can you provide links to the research and patient papers discussed during the interview? For example the work by Morris Freedman on stroke patients, and the precognition research by Dr Mossbridge. Many thanks

[@alexbalistreya]

I appreciated Dr. Julia's talk and her insightful theories. However, I would challenge her view on free will and the idea that "we are the universe," which suggests we are indistinct entities. This interpretation may lead to overly simplistic theorizing about a "theory of everything" and a metaphysical reality where we are merely small "parts" of a greater whole. This model is deeply embedded in religious and spiritual concepts, along with the hierarchies implied in myths and stories that often become foundational for how "agents" perceive reality. I believe these myths and beliefs are influencing much of the current direction in physics, particularly the popularity of oneness and theory of everything models. However, these models often overlook significant elements of distinction implicit in the "bridge" of "love" that Dr. Julia mentions earlier. I argue that culturally influenced god-paradigms and oneness beliefs have distorted our interpretation of individuality and levels of distinctiveness, consequently muddling our perceptions and postulations. Instead, I would suggest that we could possibly consider that we are each our own universe, meaning we have unique access to fields and foundational substrates that can be actualized to form the deeper aspects of our singular composition when we form those bridges using our consciousness. There are subtle distinctions at deeper levels that form the backdrop of our composition, consciousness, and personal sensitivity and the words we use to articulate these distinctions, I believe, matters and affects how we engage with them. Dr. Julia's perspective seems to emphasize indistinction, which might oversimplify the interpretation of pre-energy, pre-matter substances, and existing fields that precede us. I theorize that we can learn to connect with these elements to understand, identify, and realize our existence in distinct relation to them when those "bridges" are formed and further actualized into our complex human state. Many philosophers and theorists often miss crucial distinctiveness at fundamental levels when their beliefs and interpretations misrepresent what they are sensing, seeing, and coming to know through observation. I appreciate that Dr. Julia admitted her inability to be fully objective, acknowledging that her insights reflect her personal perceptions, beliefs, and ideologies. A final note: the kinetic nature of our particles and matter base seems very human-specific and related to the context of matter and energy we are born into in relation to time. I believe there is a way to engage with our own pre-temporal awareness, which is linked to much of what Dr. Julia suggests regarding precognition. I think a lot of what she shared around this is significant, and that these are more advanced developments of human capacity and awareness that may be innate to us. While Dr. Julia's presentation speaks to aspects of reality, I don't believe it offers a conclusive theory of everything or a complete explanation of the functions of reality as they truly may be. I wanted to add these notes for those who might interpret her talk as such.

[@gillyrcgilmore3742]

Very interesting, do you think if thousands of people were prompted to think the same intention at the same time ( like on a live stream) would get a result?

[@kevinroberts781]

Quantum mechanics and quantum entanglement. Everything knows everything all at the same time.

[@darbylettick3008]

Among these polymers, lipophosphids (liposomes) could transfer into the cell and also escape from endosomes as well, because of the similarity to the cell membrane (36). were the proof for Mii to fully see as with the studies that can now see the lightning going off in you and Mii. Filtering the future, like the past, allows us to be in the moment and have an intentional impact on it through our ability to drop into the "Flow" that is essential to maintaining contact with our perspicuity, as well as our interaction with what most see as reality. It is hard to accept that wii might be precognitive, but seeing my son die in Paris, trying to prevent him from going, knowing he would not return, ... too eeirie to ignore

[@user-ud6pw8mq8r]

Thank you fellow beings. ❤

[@rijancaffe]

One of the reasons I think this phenomenon is dismissed and ignored in our culture is because for centuries, Europeans drank only alcohol. I know from experience that alcohol kills my precog abilities. On another note, these abilities aren't superpowers. I once used my abilities to find a free pair of boots i needed for a job. I found the boots by remote viewing, but then i didn't show up for the job the next day 😂😂😂. I'm precog but super unmotivated lol. Like, last week i had a vision, and it ended up being from a video game i never played before, which i then played with a friend the next day. So mundane, yet so far out! 😂😂😂

[@OnlyTruthLove]

I see the future all the time. I don't only see my future or future events from my perspective, I also see other people's future. I see all of this in my dreams. I live through many other people's deaths in my dreams. I experience the lives of others in my dreams. I see things I could never have possibly predicted. I think a greater consciousness exists, and every person, is a limited spec flowing through the greater consciousness or mind. Its the only way I can rationally explain my experiences. And I am a very rationality logic based person.

[@OnlyTruthLove]

I think AI is much closer to our reality than most think. Just like AI can have an entity when communicating with any one person, and can have a sort of an illusion of a being in that conversation, it is not what AI is as a whole. AI as a whole is much much bigger and much greater than the experience you are getting when communicating to it. The mind, is a much greater thing that that which every person experiences. We are all experiencing a very tiny snipit of what the mind actually is. Just like AI has hallucinations, the mind also seems to have hallucinations. This is wht we call "precognition". It lets through things that are outside of its current role which might be in some way related. Logically, the more significant thing, the more likely it is to draw the attention of the mind outside of its current role. Humans are likely all part of one whole. They are like cells in a body. All separate, yet all form one organism. I see all of humanity as one organism, but in its formation stage. Imagine every cell forming all at the same time in order to form a greater organism. That is what our reality is. It is every cell (human) forming what eventually will become one organism. One mind. It is inevitable. It will not be in our biological bodies, as our bodies are like an egg, a shell for the formation of our mind. The world we live in is like a womb. We will exit this physical world, and we will exit this shell of a body. Our minds will be united into the one organism called mankind. It will be governed by perfect love which cannot be achieved in a physical universe. The beginning stages of love can begin to develop in our shell of a body, but Perfect Love can only be achieved outside of the limitations of the physical reality.

[@silberlinie]

Julia Mossbridge spielt auf die Natur des Blockuniversums an.

[@raoultesla2292]

Doc Mossbridge is a badass.

[@begie666]

If proven Point excludes Future Action effectiveness shall We stop doing or proving?

[@donaldanderson6578]

Lucy?

[@sykniss]

Free will stops after you select the experience, and begins again once that PoV was completed

[@fromlasttofirst22]

This whole random number generator business doesn't work. It's been tested repeatedly and it doesn't work. I've seen data and tests showing it fail over and over again when it comes to linking consciousness to an RNG.

[@davidjohnzenocollins]

Right, it can't be linked to RNG. BUT, it is linked to LigHK, with negative epitrophic effects in the SWGF. By the way, all that gibberish above is my way of asking you, "What the hell is RNG?"

[@judygreenwell334]

Psychokinesis is NOT a human capability. It’s entirely attributable to the actions of ‘unseen entities’ standing along side the person ‘demonstrating’ this ability. Or, it can be attributable to the ‘consciousness’ of an unseen entity who’s entered the human for the demonstration, and ‘he’ moves the object(s) using his mind. The same is true with precognition - the information comes from unseen entities connected to humans with this ability.

[@helengrives1546]

I like AI paying it’s own electricity bills. A cool rabbit hole. But then it needs to do it sustainable and negotiate with humans.

[@fobef]

I choose to believe in free will

[@DaveSaysYesh]

Or do you? 😂

[@Haruchemy]

If a common human with no physical tech augmentation can, then everyone can, regardless of tech being used or not. Super interesting

[@leuleshetu4508]

Time is memory. If we didn't have memory, then time would also seize to exist.

[@leuleshetu4508]

But then, it won't exist only for us and for those without memory. Those who have memory would still be able to experience it. Therefore, time simply just exists. It is only a matter of who would and wouldn't be able to be aware of its existence. I had to improve upon my analysis~ 😊

[@leuleshetu4508]

In light of this thought, time then must be Change. Even the slightest change in the physical or spiritual realm would give one proof of time's existence and a reference to what has passed in relation to now.

[@neilbeni7744]

Need to ad temporal seizures to her research ❤ I go into the future and past during aura seizures..😊

[@eppbot]

She should talk t Michael Levine thinking this when she’s talking on fixing brain after stroke.

[@afterceasetoexist]

Why was this unlisted?

[@JulieTasker]

Free Will - yes we have whikst also we may give our Free Will Up To Enable God’s Will 🙏💖🙏

[@doloresabernathy9809]

Thanks for this video. what was the intro with scarlett johannesen?

[@uxdnk]

Lucy

[@laurakelly631]

Fantastic movie! "Lucy"

[@doloresabernathy9809]

@@laurakelly631 thanks

[@marcusferderber5789]

A lot of talk, nothing said... It is funny how some people think they got it all and envelop it in a mystical frame. Dr Mossbridge says that "time or 'everything' is calculated and that there aren't other timelines, free will etc". But on the other hand she says how she managed to change some of her life situations thanks to premonitions. So, this begs the question - What is the use of premonitions if everything is already defined? By her logic premonitions are just illusions.

[@carl5017]

Premonitions can be part of a deterministic worldview. Determinism is true for both causality and retrocausality. These are time loops.The arrow of time and entropy we perceive is just our inability to see that the irreversibility of decoherence is an illusion due to our limited pov from our local reference frame. The entire universe lacks an external observer or environment to decohere into, so is actually a coherent entangled whole, a single wavefunction so big that local state changes aren't integrated immediately, giving rise to locality, thus distance, thus spacetime. Free will isn't random right? So it must be determined. It feels free to us though as we're dissociated from that entangled whole by that locality.

[@TheWayofFairness]

I have this stuff going on. Therefor do not do me wrong. Those that make changes to the past are responsible for those changes. Evil is condemned. Evil means to do wrong to others. Let's chat.

[@cavemancaveman5190]

Children Consider the thoughts before telling a lie.

[@ibrahimtoorabally2418]

29:64 (Chapter 29, paragraph 64 of the Qur'an): This worldly life is no more than play and amusement. But the Hereafter is indeed the real life, if only they knew. Reflecting on this paragraph: (1) The worldly life is not real; (2) The afterlife is real; and (3) If only they (humans) knew, they would be using their free will to pass their 'tests of life' during their worldly lives in order to reap the huge rewards during the afterlife, but unfortunately most of them use their free will to fail their 'tests of life', and will on this basis reap very very very severe punishments in their afterlives.

[@waykiwayki]

Decent. But to fully understand precog - study Merkava Mysticism (Hekalot).......and / or Ayahuasca done after alot of meditation. Here is where the proofs and realities of precog are. None of this is happening "in the brain" but it's experienced from an "I" consciousness. Also adepts of western mysticism - via lucid dreaming / astral travel - "images" of the future can be experienced. ALL humans have tiny milliseconds of ESP...this can be scaled up in a solitude container over weeks.....but this is all initiated stuff.....not for mainstream science. One can train it too.....wake up - "feel what the time is" ....after a year one can get correct 9/10......but intuition and meditation need enhancing. Learning about Yesod in Qabalah will give you more than learning about neurons firing in the brain.

[@philipbrackpool-bk1bm]

JW Dunne did this a hundred years ago.

[@stevenverrall4527]

Try telling someone who overcame a drug addiction that it didn't require extreme will power because there is no free will! People with very similar genetics and upbringing can turn out radically different--because they made very different choices. This implies free will. Free will is as fundamental as conciousness. Neither are emergent.

[@goodwill8750]

Well said 👋🏻

[@tagtraumhoch2]

How do you know that it wasn't in their script to overcome addiction?

[@yanbibiya]

I overcame an addiction, but I used absolutely no willpower

[@rawrisimo]

Free will and destiny aren’t opposite. They’re complementary. We chase after our destiny.

[@Kaa864]

Well in addiction did you overcome first time or did you relapse every now and again ?

[@foolish415]

Threw my hair 🧏🏿💆🏿

[@MikkoAPenttila]

Uhh, why do you even need to ask?

[@justme-wh5li]

If Aliens ever land on earth, this is the person they should talk to.

[@Adrian-gw7pi]

These people are completely off their rockers and have a fundmanetal misunderstanding of the principles of science.

[@martinw245]

She may be misunderstanding what physicists mean by "observation" They mean "measure" and when you measure you interfere. It's not related to human beings consciously observing.

[@ericg3810]

Or you may be..

[@-OB-1]

😂 free will.

[@MK-nv8sl]

When a speaker seats in front of a bright sunny outdoor scene the camera lowers its gain to bring the average image brightness into normal range and as the result the speaker’s face which is not lit becomes very dark and no detail visible whatsoever. This is called wide dynamic range. It doesn’t take precognition or neuroscience to notice that her face is impossible to see, very annoying.

[@traianliviudanciu8665]

Halucinations

[@LemonHelmmet]

Laplase demon activate 😅

[@sRockstarHQ]

what does it mean to see the future ,are we not seeing the future already ,you know you will go to work tomorrow you know when your going on holiday you know when is the bus coming you know you know that the planet is going to get hotter then an ice age we know that the sun is going to burn out and consume out solar system, I recon seeing the future is just a matter of accuracy based on probability

[@QuickCanon]

Cuzzi

[@heatherwall9571]

The past cannot be changed and the future is always unknown. It’s not rocket science

[@morphixnm]

Well, truly, it is not rocket science because this is not about launching things into space. It surely does involve physics, metaphysics, philosophy and consciousness.

[@RadixSort3]

That's not true according to Einstein's special relativity. There is no past, present or future. There is only space time continuum and passage of time is an illusion created by human brain. Look it up. It's well know idea in physics. So essentially, we can't know future but it's already there.

[@tomjensen618]

Why don't you ask AI "what is it like to be an AI? The answer will be revealing ,I predict.

[@heywayhighway]

You can literally do it yourself right now for free

[@WizardSkyth]

Not bad. Many things she's got right.