EU Law - Freedom of Establishment and Services

[@Meankeen]

Thanks a lot! I have an exam coming up in two weeks. Freedom of establishment will be part of it, and your explanation is even better than that if my professor!

[@marcuscleaver]

+Dylan Julian Cheers Dylan, thanks for taking the time to comment!

[@markwashere6687]

our commercial law professor gave us the cases which they are below for Freedom of Establishment and Services Case C-345/08, Pesla • Case C-118/09, Koller • Case C-225/09, Jakubowska • Case C-137/09, Josemans • Case C-359/09, Ebert • Case C-101/10, Pavlov & Famira • Case C-470/11 Garkalns SIA • Case C-475/11 Kontstantinides • Case C-539/11 Ottica New Line • Case C-575/11 Nasiopoulous • Case C-111/12 Architects • Case C-492/12 Dentists • Cases C-159/12 to C-161/12 Venturini • Case C-367/12 Sokoll-Seebacher • Case C-390/12 Pfleger • Case C-492/12 Conseil national de l’ordre des médicins • Case C-509/12 IPTM • Cases C-58/13 and C-59/13 Toressi • Case C-365/13 Ordre des Architects

[@kirstenhiggins558]

I have my State Law exams in Ireland (FE 1s) coming up in 4 weeks. These videos are saving me! THANK YOU! You really condense it but hit all the KEY Points! THANK YOU THANK YOU!

[@marcuscleaver]

You're welcome, best of luck in the exams!

[@alparslanerbay8768]

Excellent video! Brief but at the same time all of the important points were covered, thank you.

[@antoanD]

Clarifying and much time-saving video. Thank you!

[@chej.6110]

My exam is in the morning and i'm literally falling asleep listening to your videos. Thank you soooo much for these ..!

[@marcuscleaver]

I'm not sure if falling asleep to them is a compliment or not!!!

[@chej.6110]

marcuscleaver It is no worries..! 😊

[@omanraja7588]

EU exam week and I just found about this channel now Ffs But thanks, still got time to watch other EU vids

[@albetix]

Thank you for all your EU Law videos!! So helpful ❤

[@marcuscleaver]

Thanks for taking the time to comment!

[@daft2114]

very good. thank you!

[@Alex12312]

You saved my life! Thank you so much

[@marcuscleaver]

Glad it helped!

[@Sased88]

do you have a video on equal payment and equal treatment? Thank you so much. I failed my EU social law exam quite a few times. im getting a better feeling in preparing with your videos. thanks so much!

[@waqasahmed2757]

was of great help Thanks..

[@hassanasadqureshi7283]

Thank you so much. Very helpful lecture.

[@yusufosman3347]

I am graduating with your videos mate

[@marcuscleaver]

Yes!!! That is amazing news!

[@denialchristopher2937]

would you be able to a video on 'Unincorporated associations'?

[@harrygoonan4045]

You've saved my degree, thank you, you are the dude

[@aonghusodomhnaill4883]

Liar

[@tusharsmate]

Thanks vEry much indeed! Really helped a lot.

[@Mark-en3ig]

Can compensation measures be derived from primary law? I assume that if it is necessary for a member state to impose compensation measures, they are obliged to do so. But in a case where the directive does not apply, what happens then? As it follows from Dreessen C-31/00 that "It is not the purpose of those directives to make recognition of such diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications more difficult in situations falling outside their scope". In Case C-104/91 and C-234/97, the candidate was required to show that the knowledge and qualifications were acquired, by passing an exam. This would be the same as an "aptitude test". However, do the candidates have a right to be imposed compensation measures, in order to be recognized, or can the host member state simply choose not to impose these measures and reject the application all-together? That would seem counter to art 4 "The Member States shall take any appropriate measure, general or particular, to ensure fulfilment of the obligations arising out of the Treaties or resulting from the acts of the institutions of the Union." The question was asked in case 166/20 "should Articles 45 and 49 TFEU and Article 15 of the Charter be interpreted as obliging the competent authorities of the host Member State to (...) if necessary, to apply compensation measures? The ECJ unfortunately did not answer whether this was an obligation. They quite simply said "If that comparative examination reveals substantial differences between the education and training undertaken by the applicant and the education and training required in the host Member State, the competent authorities may set compensation measures to make up for those differences."

[@fgb33]

Very useful thank you🙏🙏

[@ege9069]

thanks sir.

[@shakiraalevine4657]

From where i can get these slides ? I need it plz give me a link or something

[@katherinehudds3939]

Hi Marcus. What rights does an individual have (pre brexit) if they wanted to have a job in an Eu member state but that country had laws requiring the individual to have worked in that said country for a certain amount of years. Are there any cases similar to this? Any help would be greatly appreciated

[@SaharAtif-e2t]

Can you explain how in a problem question do i use the services directive 2006/123? For instance if it falls under the directive or is caught by the directive then what is the outcome?

[@laiminnie2875]

So If I have a company based in the UK, let say is a property agency service. If I want to set up a branch in France to expand my business in the summer time only. What company law do I follow? for example, if France need to have certain amount of asset in France in order for me to setup a branch? also, if I am not running the business through out the year, but just the few months of summer time?

[@lukagoshi]

Thanks for the explanation. It's a judoka by the way ;)

[@marcuscleaver]

Lol it's a shame people don't get to see the look of panic in my eyes when I realise I have no idea what the word for that is!

[@ElmerFudge]

Another lucid moment from the video MC (see what I did there?)

[@marcuscleaver]

I see you ;)