Such a famtastic video this. Every time I see it I try to record. But Im just so in awe as soon as I hear it I cant take my eyes off it. Other than seeing the Lancaster Bomber in the flesh this is my absaloute favourite. Just Beutiful
@DirtyHarry202010 жыл бұрын
Incredible aircraft. Thanks for the great video.
@baikal6279 жыл бұрын
Some people !!! This is the best
@HiddenPyro8 жыл бұрын
High speed passes are so sick
@woodybenjam10 жыл бұрын
No need for missiles, the sounds is terrifying enough!
@vychuck10 жыл бұрын
Nothing can beat this beautiful beast
@sucellus545210 жыл бұрын
F22, RAFALE, SU35 ca beat typhoon...
@Dokkaebi7079 жыл бұрын
TOTO CACA lool F-22
@sucellus54529 жыл бұрын
Takao Kancolle and? yes you will say something?
@Dokkaebi7079 жыл бұрын
TOTO CACA trash. All 5th gens are trash.
@sucellus54529 жыл бұрын
Takao Kancolle ho an expert in jet fighter talk...
@Aviation4K10 жыл бұрын
Amazing!
@andystuder96139 жыл бұрын
Damn.....I love military craft (have done since I was small)....Millions upon millions to organise/purchase and such.....and considering that.....I love watching them.....Speed......Agility.....Maneouverability (can't spell that word =p)..... I love being British xD Royal Air Force.....I can't get enough xD
@itellzzz10 жыл бұрын
super filming
@deyvi6910 жыл бұрын
I love this airplane!!!!
@claudiaaraujo725010 жыл бұрын
I Love Gripen!!!
@Mr.McWatson10 жыл бұрын
Also an inverted negative g climb from horizontal- never seen that before
@ElwynR10 жыл бұрын
Was this taken with the Sony FDR-AX100 4K you were testing a few weeks ago? excellence quality!!
@guyfihi10 жыл бұрын
I'm not an engineer, but when I look at this aircraft, I see a relatively large wing area compared to the fuselage which I think accounts for the high maneuverability. Conversely, whenI look at the F-35 I see a small wing compared to the fuselage and I think that thing must turn like a dump truck. Although the Harrier had a small wing area and did well in the Falklands, so who knows.
@davetek49010 жыл бұрын
You're right, it's called wing loading. Generally low wing loading (big wing relative to aircraft mass) gives you high maneuverability. Good for dog fighting. High wing loading is less sensitive to gusts, and the smaller wings have less parasitic drag. Good for low level high speed flight, and stability during ground attack runs. If foreign countries who bought into the F-35 think they are getting something that can turn and burn with a Typhoon, Rafale, or Sukhoi, they are in for a rude awakening... The harrier is a awesome plane, but, I think the worst it had to face in the falklands were french super entendards (could be wrong).
@Jonathanlemud10 жыл бұрын
It's also due to the avionics on board, due to the position of the center of gravity (which on this plane can move so that the plane is completely unstable in subsonic flight and stable in supersonic flight) and, of course, due to aerodynamics special design (canard plus delta wings).
@guyfihi10 жыл бұрын
davetek490 I have never seen an F-35 flight demo, but I have seen an F-22 flight demo at the California International Airshow in Sacramento several years ago. It was doing things that this Eurofighter wasn't doing in this display I can tell you that. You could see the effect of the thrust vectoring as it almost stopped in mid air and turned on a dime. I understand the F-35 has thrust vectoring also, so that may be a way to compensate for the high wing loading.
@guyfihi10 жыл бұрын
guyfihi I just checked and if you go to F-22 Sacramento 2010 (or something to that effect), you will see the same show I saw in person. There are several videos.
@davetek49010 жыл бұрын
guyfihi The F-22 is a very exceptional airframe let down by its fragile radar absorbent coating. I've seen an F-22 demo in person, it's impressive. But just from eye-balling it (from demos I've seen online), the Typhoon and especially the Rafale have it beat in sustained turn rate (natural for a delta/canard config). The F-22 can probably turn inside them initially though - impressive for the heavier plane. The F-35B for the Marines has thrust vectoring, but only in the Harrier sense (for V/STOL only). The nozzle can't vector upwards which is the way you'd want it to point to help pull more positive G when turning. If they wanted to make a great collaborative fighter, they should just take the Rafale, give it two vertical stabilizers bent at an angle, and slap some stealth paint on it. Boom, best fighter in the world.
@evandroprestesbrum77219 жыл бұрын
Show!! O caça é lindo eo piloto gosta muito do que faz!!!
@andystuder96139 жыл бұрын
+Evandro prestes brum E assim ele deve ... Tudo que o treinamento ... Ele realmente é bom .... e ele é apenas o piloto de demonstração ...
@jonhart76308 жыл бұрын
The Typhoon is the best fighter aircraft in the world by a country mile. The only problem maybe is its small size, which limits the payload it can carry to be a strike aircraft although they are developing ordinance it can carry to be a strike aircraft.
@TEHGROUND10 жыл бұрын
Impressive.
@hdschoedel9 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile in America we're building the World's fastest dump truck and calling it the F-35.
@Smigger979 жыл бұрын
+hdschoedel Meanwhile in Europe we're buying them, I really was shocked when I seen the top speed of the F-35.
@sameh650010 жыл бұрын
SAMEH,S FIGHTERS,SAMEH,S DESIGN.
@StevieSmith7710 жыл бұрын
I watched this back to back with the f22 display, and to me the typhoon looks much more nimble, much to my surprise
@davidburke436010 жыл бұрын
Its easy to be nimble with no armament, but when your loaded with fuel drop-tanks and missiles it wont be so nimble. With huge drag from external weapons and fuel tank it would be hard to keep it at mach without burning through its fuel rapidly.
@StevieSmith7710 жыл бұрын
As it turns out, it was highly effective at red flag with high loads too
@muppetrolf10 жыл бұрын
This is correct. Eurofighter are very silent about how this ground attack/long range suite effects Eurofighter's aerodynamics. It will degrade the performance of the aircraft, but they won't say how much. To the contrary, the F-15 was so well thought out in 1965 that adding conformal fuel tanks either side of the fuselage actually improves the drag coefficient. About time Eurofighter was put to bed for the money sapping tactically incomplete aeroplane that it is.
@StevieSmith7710 жыл бұрын
Yeah yeah, if it's not american, it's crap. Whatever you say
@davetek49010 жыл бұрын
***** I don't think anyone's saying the Typhoon is crap. I just think it's very expensive for not being stealthy, not having a great passive sensor array, and have specious ground attack capability (as of yet). What the Brits have is a Fleet Defense Fighter, without the fleet to launch it. It's the reason why the Typhoon isn't selling well; no one can afford to have *just* a CAP fighter for that kinda of outlay. I wouldn't call it crap. More like, incomplete.
@Treetop6410 жыл бұрын
D-Day stripes on the ET. Lol, could you imagine...?
@MegaVector20119 жыл бұрын
German engineering plus British Engineering = the best engineering. Here is an aircraft demonstrating that. I dont care about American hype. I'm proud to be European and wish to stay closer to my European cousins.
@fdsdh18 жыл бұрын
+MegaVector2011 British engineering+German management= best lol
@Mr.McWatson10 жыл бұрын
This is gen 4.5 isnt it?
@jonmusic088 жыл бұрын
is it true that the UK sold the entire Harrier Jump jet fleet and spares to the US and yet they could have run that fleet for a year at the cost of one Euro Typhoon Fighter. Guess that sums up the UK Government
@jarmomaltio999810 жыл бұрын
Won Kim PAH :P
@robertobruselas395210 жыл бұрын
Up to the next generation fighter! Or we are loosing the fight! (SU-35&MIG29update&MIG35)
@freenk02210 жыл бұрын
NO F-35!
@TheArfdog10 жыл бұрын
Looks like a 4th gen fighter lol
@Rusfans9 жыл бұрын
летающая телега
@andystuder96139 жыл бұрын
+Rusfans абсолютный вред
@vsn11910 жыл бұрын
Nothing is better than Russian Sukhoi SU-35 and MIG 35's. Typhoon, Rafale, Gripen, Lightning II.... nothing can come close sorry but that's the truth!
@ijjpfsx1710 жыл бұрын
And where is the proof? None of the jets you mentioned were used in combat. You can't use theoretical numbers and calculations to prove how thing would do in practice. You know what is worse than American propaganda? Russian propaganda. SU-35 probably has the best maneuverability of all these jets, but it's not stealth, and the ordinary dogfight was more important during WWII. We are on the 21st century.
@giosue402710 жыл бұрын
on what basis do you say who Sukhoi SU-35 and Mig 35 are better than of Typhoone !? because comparative test show the opposite !
@alexnickolaev10 жыл бұрын
well, i don't know if SU 35 and MIG 35 are better, but definetely not worse. And no one is buying them because Russia doesn't sell them on export yet. thanks for the video, enjoyed the show
@ijjpfsx1710 жыл бұрын
alexnickolaev That's the smart move of Russia: protect itself instead of giving weapons to other countries. Now Turkey is helping ISIS with the F-16s, drones and helicopters that they bought from USA some years ago...
@RandomVideos210 жыл бұрын
LoL yeah right
@Dokkaebi7079 жыл бұрын
What's with all this rafale fanboys lool.
@andystuder96139 жыл бұрын
+Cheeki Breeki If you're referring to the RAF then maybe its because this video was shot in Farnborough, United Kingdom? Fair enough a lot of air forces differ but....from what I've been told by various soldiers at different times (from different countries) they all said that the RAF don't do have a bad job..... I knew a soldier here in the UK too. He said that the RAF are really the "kings of the skies"....How close they can get to it....is another matter but yeah..... ~Andy
@jarmomaltio999810 жыл бұрын
F-16 Old but Best fighter in the world so small so fast in ur six all time and DIE
@jamesalders89610 жыл бұрын
Russia can make a fast and maneuverable plane but their air to air missiles would be out done by a paper airplane.
@davidburke436010 жыл бұрын
I have seen better demonstrations from F-16 and F-15 in the 1980's than that. No demonstration of tight radius turn or high rate role. I thought this was supposed to be a demonstration of something.
@muppetrolf10 жыл бұрын
I don't know why they bothered. Not like any foreign air forces are interested anymore. If the owners of this aircraft cannot afford to run it, how do we expect anyone to buy it? Tornado off to Iraq again I see. Shows Eurofighter up for what it is..... Useless!