Euronaval 2018: Focus on Naval Aviation

Naval Aviation is one of the main talking points at Euronaval 2018.
In this video, we are focusing on:
Launch the studies for future aircraft carrier(s) in France
Dassault Aviation NGF New Generation Fighter concept
General Atomics EMALS
U.S. Navy E-2D Advanced Hawkeye
Interview with French Navy about E-2D
Airbus / Survey Copter Aliaca UAV
Airbus A320Neo MPA Maritime Patrol Aircraft

[@Gsmooth10455]

I was very impressed by the Airbus A320 Neo. J'ai été très impressionné par l'Airbus 320 Neo.

[@javierjosechavezbenitez3707]

FIELDING MELISH I saw this video for that VERY reason, to see the A320 MPA - an A320 variant for the armed forces.

[@RogerSanGabriel]

I am too.

[@hansmeyer7225]

basically

[@michellelagos-young3398]

Excellent reporting and thank you for the highlights!

[@jccalvente]

Airbus A320 NEO is amazing.

[@jamieshields9521]

Any new development on NH 90 helicopter for navy version? Great vid👍Airbus new MPA got hardware, I wonder what nations are looking to purchase it?

[@Puzzoozoo]

Looking at the list of navies and their equipment, apart from naturally France, and even they may not have the money, I can't see any that would put in such a big and expensive order for the Airbus MPA. Even the profligate Saudi's are buying the American Poseidon.

[@yahyyahy3055]

#T50 foooorr

[@markbrisec3972]

I would like to ask that big shot from the General Atomics why the hell today, in 2021, two years after this interview was taken, Ford class carrier still has problems with their EMALS and AALA systems which break down and malfunction much more frequently than the steam systems they are replacing. So what gives man? More money? Underpayed engineers? Overpaid management?

[@philchristmas4071]

EMALS is working great now. It's 30% more efficient than steam and takes up a lot less space. It's also much easier on the airplanes and much less maintenance than steam. It just takes time to get a brand new system and the technology figured out.

[@jasons44]

U.S Navy planes are all fine and updated systems . But there a old design and need a totally new hornet f-19? Stealthy, vector thrust, super Cruise & and shit people havnt heard of yet ;)🇺🇸

[@Carbon_Based_Life_Form]

If it's cheaper to strap missiles and sensors/radar onto a converted civilian jet rather than building a military jet, then you're mazy if you choose not to. A 747 can hold a shit ton of missiles and radar equipment. The only concern id have is survivability/durability. How safe are the pilots? Anything less than a purely military aircraft will be unacceptable.

[@brentoninsertname5948]

fredy no, they have a difference in military requirements to civilian standards. This is the direct opposition to Boeing’s 737 maritime patrol aircraft and awacs.

[@Carbon_Based_Life_Form]

@@brentoninsertname5948 its a civilian built 747 and converted into military standards, right?