Agree with you Evan, it's pretty hard to tell the difference without pixel peeing (at least for me). The hass looks a little warmer, but easy to adjust that in post to get exactly the same. Color tones are slightly different as you said with saturation, but you can adjust that a bit in post too. When I had a Fuji GFX the big thing I noticed is the transition of colors or light to dark gradient and honestly I'm not seeing a noticeable difference here. Nice video man, enjoyed it.
@rumorscameras Жыл бұрын
I think hasselblad is a one shot camera. One pro shot and end.
@ziggyziggyz175610 ай бұрын
… and enough :)
@forgewire3 жыл бұрын
Hasselblad true colors, smooth tone transitions, less noise and more details in shadows win hands down. You viewers would appreciate it if you sent a link to these files rather than expect them to compare it on KZbin, which is silly. I’ve checked raw files between Hasselblad and R5 and while at 1st glance Canon R glass produced sharper images but with noise in shadows at ISO 100 compared to Hasselblad. after noise correction to level them up all Canon sharpness long gone, I’m not even talking about colors. Hasselblad vs Soni is like comparing mororbike with moped.😅
@TonyNguyenFR9 ай бұрын
It’s an easy win for HB photo quality wise. The real question is if it’s worth the money for that quality jump. I would say if you are doing this type of photography professionally (ads, product, studio, promo), the benefits in workflow alone make the HB worth it. If you don’t do this kind of photography and work mostly in portrait, events, and more personal type photography it isn’t as important.
@misahungry3 жыл бұрын
That was a tough one! I'm viewing this on my laptop full screen, and from what I can tell, they are very close. The colors on the Sony are a bit more saturated as you mentioned vs the Hass looking a little softer and not as vibrant. But like what Mike just mentioned, that could easily be fixed in post to make the colors look almost identical. The one thing that really stands out to me and one thing you can't quite do in post (at least not without some major Photoshopping) would be the softer rolloff for the highlights and shadows. Those softer rolloffs make it look so much smoother and more pleasing. It's similar, but not quite as drastic, but when you compare a similar shot from a phone vs a full frame. The larger sensor and more refined sensor just allows for that softer rolloff to look more pleasing. I do prefer the look of the Hass, but I am nowhere near being able to afford one of those, haha. I'll stick with my A7III until I can afford something like that
@CraigCapello3 жыл бұрын
In my experience I would try and push the raw files in post. See how far you can push the colors before they break. That’s how I knew MF files are better than full frame. Yes, both cameras have plenty of room to recover highlights. But go in to the luminance tab in ACR and drag the sliders for the blues and see where the noise starts to appear. The 16bit color depth of the Hasselblad files should hold up much better than the Sony 14bit. I’d bet the color noise appears much sooner in the Sony. Of course the leaf shutter has its advantages as well with sync speed since you don’t hit the curtain until 2000. But that price just keeps me renting MF. Maybe 2022 will change all that.
@pogiland3 жыл бұрын
Very interesting to see this, Evan! For me the price tag itself is just to high to even consider the Hasselblad - as a hobby photographer ;-) Which picture is better? Very tough... Hard to say. Which one reflects the actual scene, the product and its colors and characteristics better? Only you can see and compare it with your own eyes when setting up the original scene I guess? Looking forward to seeing more Hasselblad testing! Is there anything unique to the Hasselblad where other cameras really fail?
@algirdasmikalauskas33732 жыл бұрын
This is about the same situation when crop and full frame are spawned. On a larger matrix, there will always be better color depth and halftones, better clarity and noise. No megapixels of a smaller matrix and no lenses will make a photo on a smaller matrix better than a photo on a camera with a larger matrix, if the cameras are of about the same generation.