Evidence for Parallel Universes - Max Tegmark / Serious Science

[@Leto85]

I'm confident that in one of these parallel universes I actually understood all that he had said.

[@pepeg.luthier566]

I understood pretty well. He explained it very simple, even a Trump supporter would understand it. (Nhaaa! Just kidding!!)

[@JerseyLynne]

@@dish125db it's a joke, son.

[@lenahalt2347]

dish125db dude I love that text

[@whitenightnight5245]

It's easy, Drink apple cider !

[@whitenightnight5245]

@@pepeg.luthier566 no your not, hahaha

[@denizorsel1029]

The ability to tell something which is so complex yet so easy to understand... Respect.

[@alwaysflat7996]

deniz Orsel What was so easy? The pile of horse shit that he made up is that what you call complex and easy, there is no hope in the human race anyone who starts talking shit you people take it as the ultimate truth and you waited for him to tell you things that most people imagined, it is ALL in your head, as he said, he can't observe it, can't see it, can't detect it. He can assume that's the best he can do, what is wrong with you people wilful ignorance for some "purpose" or what?

[@AndreQozine]

samuel barry There was a guy once, he talked shit who couldn't be observed, couldn't be seen, couldn't be detected. Many people ridiculed him until he had proven some of his theories... I believe his name was Albert Einstein but who knows. And there were others after him it seems. Theoretical physics is a profession for a reason. Without imagination we wouldn't be able to discover things we did.

[@THEBOSS-vn2ky]

@@alwaysflat7996 oh come on where's your imagination😳

[@tippyandfriend]

@@alwaysflat7996 It's not simply assumed, it is an educated hypothesis based on evidenced and tested scientific theories, not horse shit. He did actually explain that if you bothered to listen. smh. No sensible person is taking as anything beyond an educated hypothesis ffs.

[@MacMac1313]

@@AndreQozine The first few lines had laughing. I actually thought you were ridiculing him until you got to the Einstein part. It was a witty approach. At least that's how it seemed to me.

[@FireflyJack]

He’s one of my favorite scientists. He just knows how to explain complexed concepts in a way that the layperson can easily understand. We need more people like this.

[@dagmastr12]

This guy makes these things understandable... I wish I heard him when I was in school.

[@iwannaseenow1]

wish i had classes in high school that would value this knowledge.

[@whitenightnight5245]

You still Are , set down. Hahaha

[@eddymcgrant4570]

@@iwannaseenow1 you didnt have physics?

[@cerimite7674]

I am 72 years old and studying quantum sciences and although having a 25 year career in classical chemistry, it is never too late to continue advancing your knowledge and the discovery process.

[@henryjacobsen733]

We're we www w××wss-@6t

[@sonofblessed]

According to what he's saying, physics does not have unified definition of the word *universe.* Some people, such as Michio Kaku, speak about other universes in terms of universes that exist in other dimensions parallel to ours. Tegmark is referring to other universes as areas of space outside of our reach, but in the same dimension.

[@keithc497]

Well said. That was the first conclusion I came to as well. I'm not impressed. All they have done is change the definition of the word

[@keithc497]

The same thing has been done with infinity, there are some out there say there is something larger than infinity... and to prove their theory they went and redefined its meaning

[@alwaysflat7996]

sonofblessed because they all talk nothing but shit, they fill people's heads with crap and call it science. Now they have to change the definition of science, and scientific method, in order to incorporate all of that stupid crappy imagined worlds.

[@sonofblessed]

@PROTOTYPE 444 I agree with that. What he says at 00:45 is not correct because he says that there are universes, in the plural, in those regions from where light can't reach us. I'm just saying that those aren't other universes, but part of the same universe. Maybe he accidentally used the wrong word.

[@thomas9919]

Did any of you idiots actually watch past level 1 parallel universes?

[@adamthapazz4137]

this has to be the best parallel universe video I've come across. .. in this universe

[@doncarlodivargas5497]

For once we are better than those other universes

[@nayamast]

Hahahahahaha same

[@phillopiano3793]

Its all true,i died and was transferred. They try to fool u in thinking it was a nde,but i figured it out, anyone questioning if they died and switched i have some answers.peace.

[@fluffyvonnothing4107]

@@phillopiano3793 what do you mean? I need answers

[@fluffyvonnothing4107]

@@phillopiano3793 I died. I need answers

[@binokk_1]

Who else has found this on their recommend in 2020?!

[@soleaguirre100]

me ! june 1 / 2020 greetings from Chile 🇨🇱

[@jewlchamp6844]

Queen of The south what do you mean come forward? Onlly after you go on tv?

[@User-TyB185vb4Dr]

Today! 3rd June 2020 Greetings from Malaysia 🇲🇾😁🤘

[@soleaguirre100]

Jen C. 👋🏼 hi! from Malasia 🇲🇾 greetings from Chile in quarantine A lots of months almost crazy 😝

[@User-TyB185vb4Dr]

@@soleaguirre100 Hi! Yes, we're also stuck at home for nearly 3 months now...😁🤘

[@ChrischrosBelgium]

I Just love the way Max Tegmark talks and smiles and tells this with passion.

[@chuckschillingvideos]

Too bad it's all just a fantasy built upon nothing but fantasy.

[@Mierzeek]

A theory is not a fantasy! @@chuckschillingvideos

[@chuckschillingvideos]

@@Mierzeek When zero evidence to support it. A theory without any foundation is indeed, speculation, fantasy, imagination. It's not science.

[@Mierzeek]

Facepalm@@chuckschillingvideos

[@notmyfirstdaycooton7040]

They're hypotheses until proven. @@Mierzeek

[@KWolf-vb7po]

I find Max, an enjoyable person to listen to. As a NATIVE American Indian(Eastern band Cherokee), It's nice to hear a scholar who trys to explain something, that we are made fun of, not only. For believing but knowing... To me I was raised with not just believing but knowing our relationship with what others call parallel universe.. It's our way of seeing and knowing...that it is real and exist to us ( NATIVE Americans)... It's nice to see science stating ancient knowledge....

[@lemmonade]

Now this is a dude I’d want to sit down for a coffee with

[@Od4n]

Or perhaps San Gria?

[@innerlight4601]

I will join in gladly 😉

[@Rubbernecker]

This man has an incredible ability to explain these concepts in a way that is easy to understand. I'd love to take one of his classes.

[@rix0r222]

Max is awesome. I highly recommend his book "Our Mathematical Universe" where we goes into much more detail on these 3 levels of multi-verses, as well as a 4th level.

[@foreigncardinal7583]

You could wake up in a different universe everyday and not know it

[@cfrandre8319]

/ ForeignCardinal / on occasion you notice it...

[@nealthomson9505]

How about each living being is a universe and this is why love is so important. It brings two different universes as close to each other as physically possible. Do much so that communication between the two universes can happen. Black holes join up and share vast amounts of information/matter/light/energy and soul :)

[@thewizzard3150]

that is what happened to Max here. this guy is so pissed it is actually funny.

[@TheEd1225]

Dejavú? 🤔

[@roblewis3147]

I believe it, because I know for a fact I'm after going to sleep, and waking up in NOT the same world I fell asleep in.

[@blackandgold676]

In a parallel universe, kids have trading cards not of baseball players, but of scientist, and Max is the most valuable card. Respect.

[@MsScarlettKnight]

My dreams are so like real life that I swear I am in another parallel universe living the same life!

[@БабаЯга-п9д]

I always said, I am saying and I will say that sleeping is the time traveling and dreams are parallel universes . I started to think so because since the time I was very little I thought that is so weird that dreams are really not so different from what we have when awake . Then , when I begun middle school and during the biology classes when the subject was brain and things related to that , my teacher said that one of the Russian scientists ( If I don't misremember it was beginning of 20th century or 19th and I do not even remember his name ... ) said that dreams are the unhappened combinations of already happened combinations of things . I never forgot those words and since then I started to think and wonder if it is just parallel life or something like that and then as started to hear about parallel universes from physicists , I begun strongly believe that our dreams are just us but in parallel universes and somehow our mysterious brains connect us with them or let us see them like if trying to give us clue that they exist ... Well , call me crazy or stupid and some people do but I think like this and believe it .

[@MsScarlettKnight]

@@БабаЯга-п9д I completely agree with you. We do live on many other levels that this 3D existence does not know about. In fact, I had a dream last night that I was in a wheelchair being wheeled somewhere for a treatment...twice in one dream. Oddly enough, I woke up feeling flu-ish and having a pain over my knee that hurt to the touch. I definitely thought the two experiences were somehow connected.

[@БабаЯга-п9д]

@@MsScarlettKnight I believe you . Many people know about things that going to happen by previously seeing things in dreams and it is never exact repetition of the dream but slightly different combination of it ( different people , places, times, etc... ) I do predict a lot of stuff thanks to my dreams as well . Everyone does but not everybody pays attention to it . There must something about dreams and it is not just simple re-arranging of memories or things during sleep. Also, as we know animals, for example, dogs can see, smell and hear way better than us . So , of course dog might start barking because can hear way from far even if you're in very quiet faraway room/place . However, I know cases when different dogs suddenly would start barking at empty of stuff like pictures etc.., clean wall in the room or outside the house or just at one point/place in room and just keep looking at it and barking and non of those dogs ever acted crazy or stupid before and they are not related or knew each other or their owners . There must be something they see or feel the touch / presence. Maybe intersections or touching / pushing from different dimensions or membranes ... I don't think all these things are just coincidences .

[@Unknown-vu7ev]

@@MsScarlettKnight I’m not here to doubt you guys’ theory, but perhaps you’re confusing the causation of your knee pain with the causation of the dream. Like, your pain came first and then came the dream because of it.

[@БабаЯга-п9д]

@@Unknown-vu7ev If you red carefully enough you would notice that we talk about things we see first and then they happen but in different combinations and yes, things that happen already but again , we see them in different combinations of events . Nobody so far can really explain what the brain is in real. Is it not amazing how tiny electrical signals define the very nature of brain or who we are ? Electricity , energy , tiny particles , thoughts faster than speed of light ... or someone is so nice and someone is so mean and full of jealousy...... , sometimes you turn back without even passing the porch saying i have a bad feeling and better not to go ........ The brain and what it does and where it connects us is not so simple and straight forward as it seems .

[@shaneleroy6747]

I fully enjoyed this lecture by Max Tegmark.

[@nadinesmith7174]

I wish this guy was my physics teacher

[@filmfelineadmin]

' universe fine tuning' reminds me of the film Dark City

Max knows his stuff while explaining it in a easy to digest manner even a unscientific person like myself can understand... 🤔

[@johncarter6238]

@ Michael J Schumann. I think it's good for people like Max Tegmark, and you, to think out of the fucking box. I also think out of the box. I see it that way. only the numbers of stars and planets in our own universe are already mind blowing. and the distances in light years. simply said, our universe must be somewhere in a large space where it takes place, as in our own galaxy it is also not impossible that there are others galaxy, and yes there are minimum estimate 200 billion galaxy, s with at least 200 year old stars each. so it is not impossible for me that somewhere in a large space where our universe is, there are innumerable universes. thank you for your opinion that i am not alone in thinking out of the box as a citizen

[@JamesWebbKilledTheBigBangStars]

You are their best audience, unlike me who's well versed in science, I tend to take their nonsense with bucket-loads of salt.

[@robertarisz8464]

"If you can't explain something simply, you don't understand it well" Albert Einstein. I guess he knows what he is talking about.

[@AnonymousAnonymous-yv7be]

My father is dead and I terribly miss him. Hope there is a parallel universe where he is still alive 🤞

[@josuemcalderon5020]

Excellent explanation. For such a profound talk his delivery was quite straightforward!

[@briantenneson6812]

Why is there no mention of the type IV parallel universes?

[@caseylocke4474]

I love this guy. He puts things in an understandable way. I think I am prejudice in reverse, though. His minor facial ticks make me immediately feel he's super smart and worth listening to.

[@mohamadreazabdullah1702]

Thank you for a very interesting discussion of the possibility of the existence of parallel universes from a strictly scientific perspective. To broaden the scope of the vision, I'd suggest that the scientists working in this area also examine the ancient classics and philosophies for clues into the existence of parallel universes, and how the concept of the multi-verse was presented at that time. In my view, a thorough review of the classics and ancient philosophies is important for one reason: it might give the scientists new clues to see the problem differently and possibly to investigate the problem in a different way. In the search for truth, there's no reason whatsoever to discard other sources and traditions of knowledge, be it philosophical or mystical. One place to start could be a careful review of the Tantric theory of loka. Loka is a Sanskrit word that denotes a plane of existence, a sphere of the macrocosmic mind. Tantra postulates the existence of multiple lokas, the vast physical universe being the crudest manifestation of the Cosmic Mind. There are several progressively more subtle lokas or universes or planes of existence in Creation, each with its own attributes and laws. In my opinion, the most thorough and potentially scientifically compatible explanation of the theory of lokas is by the 20th century mystic and scholar Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar. A supporting idea, also by the same person, is the hypothesis of the existence of Microvita, the fundamental particles of consciousness. There's no harm in reviewing these philosophical and mystical ideas to see if they could be followed up scientifically, or help in any way to illuminate new directions in the search for multiple universes.

[@magister.mortran]

You are absolutely correct here. These theories have not just been developed by us today, because we are so much smarter than people in the past. People in the past had exactly the same ideas and theories. Now I am not that familiar with Indian philosophy, but I a ware that it makes similar predictions as modern quantum mechanics. I am more familiar with Western philosophy due to my cultural background. The Greek philosopher Epicurus for example also predicted an infinite number of worlds, because while the cosmos itself is infinite, the number of possible arrangements of particles (worlds) is finite. Therefore all possible arrangements must exist an infinite number of times. This means all possible outcomes of events (separate worlds) are somewhere realized in the cosmos.

[@jayaramanganapathi9385]

So well explained. Wonderful. Connecting of obscure dots which do appear to be philosophical in general, has given food of thought and munching. Best on the subject.

[@Ken-wc7po]

AWESOME WORK MAX.. THANKS FOR MAKING IT UNDERSTANDABLE FOR US 2 SEMESTER PHYSICS STUDENTS.. A+

[@melaniestarkey7868]

Is there an update for this parallel universes this was 7 years ago

[@Telugubitcoin]

I'm sure you are living in 2021

[@IfbbProRolandcHazard]

Always loved Science, one of my favorite classes in High School. So many interesting things to think about, the only thing that held me back from it was my math skills, they sucked or else or could have easily have seen myself becoming a guy like Max Tegmark,100% Science nerd.

[@hayley1868]

Exactly that's why I took Business studies and then did teachers training and I am a teacher now and during time of holidays I study these topics

[@bivens3ify]

Max Tegmark may just have made one of the most profound statements ever.

[@pauliether.c.guy.3349]

I love this guy. He is smart wait smart is an understatement this guy is an epic genius. Love the way he explains everything. Hope to see him soon.

[@arthurlefebvre1094]

I think that parallel universes can be over top of one another in the same space, in higher vibrational dimensions, rather than somewhere else & other individual manifestations of our personal lives should be called alternate universes.... Parallel universes are permanent, but alternate universes are temporary, around as long as needed & then dissolved....

[@kenshinhimura8133]

That's pretty much a Level 3 Parallel multiverse.

[@markymark1072]

Like layers ? Good as thought as any

[@kenshinhimura8133]

@@markymark1072 More or less. Like layers vibrating/overlapping at different frequency(not the right term) or whatever. I guess this comes under string theory. Another theory could be the mirroring of an anti universe.

[@leonardolech]

Could be that the constants in the universe are fine-tuned to life because of life actually can happen from a pool of possibilities and of course, if we just happened when we look to the constants they HAVE to be fine-tuned, otherwise, we wouldn't even be able to study it... So, from our perspective they are perfect for our existence, if not, we wouldn't exist in the first place. All other configurations coexist... it's not that we are special it's just that we can be so here we are.

[@stevekiley6121]

I sort of agree with you. I think that consciousness is more fundamental to the Universe than most materialist scientists would agree with. I'm not just talking about human consciousness, but all living creatures. Why don't these parallel universes exist? The materialists say it it is too extravagent, but even having one is beyond human understanding. Proving any of this is the problem, by the scientific method, which I am a believer in.

[@Hexanitrobenzene]

You just described Anthropic principle.

[@thewizzard3150]

This is what makes us special. you just proved it.

[@StellarBlue1]

The sheer number of Galaxies, stars and planets dictate the exact replication of existing realities, probably many times over. All my other selfs agree with me, completely...

[@Franco1040-o7g]

I hope you are totally right in your last Statement, truly🙏

[@rich1051414]

String theory is not proven, however it is favored because of all the questions it would answer and make logical if it is correct. That by no means it is correct, but the prospect seems good for it. The problem with string theory is the sheer difficulty in testing it, as it deals with multidimensional effects. By the very nature of something being outside our dimension, we cannot measure it. However, we can test the things it predicts that would be measurable in our dimension, but this is the reason it has not been proven/disproved yet. So far, we have been unable to disprove it by these means, but the difficulty in testing is the main reason many scientists reject it. The wave function collapse basically screams that multiple dimensions must exist, but we do not know what happens to the 'other' realities when a wave function does collapse, but reality forking into multiple dimensions is a model that works, but we don't know if it's accurate or not. It would prove the concept of the philosophical 'free will' once and for all though.

[@justushall9634]

About 6:04, he says there are 6 kinds of quarks. Are we sure there aren’t any further kinds of quarks still to be discovered?

[@TheMikeygas]

what is the 10th to the power of 500 or 10^500.....am i correct in thinking that this equates as a whole number to be, 1 followed by 500 zeros or in other words, 500 x 500 and thats how many parallel universes they calculate

[@Jinnuksuk]

I often find it difficult to focus on what he's talking about thinking to myself 'does this guy have muscle in his nose?'

[@Misslisasolutions]

Sad for you

[@henriklarsen9616]

Oh lord, you just ruined his talk - now I can not concentrate.

[@Loyale1229]

😂😂🤣

[@ElleMay]

😂🤣😂

[@ElleMay]

I can’t concentrate now! 😂🤣😂

[@Velopter]

Is there any way that the mandela effect could be tested using physics instead of psychology?

[@robynannan7015]

Ben -- Absolutely!! Just by watching this video.

[@Drkwll]

It may be quantum mechanical in nature.

[@GenesisReveal]

I hear it worked pretty well in South Africa. :D

[@antedox1]

I will be very angry if we find out that there are multiple parallel universes, and this is the one I ended up in.

[@SupaStar100]

😂

[@arkanasays]

If we exist in parallel universes, then are we at the same timescale? What if we die in one, are we still alive in another one? Or do we continue exist for eternity if there are infinite universes? And if we are in a different time scale and obviously different space, how does that mean there are multiple same versions of 'us'? We are what we are by nature and nurture. So being in a different nurture will have different effects on us, so we cannot be exactly the same version of us. It would mean having different versions of us, good or bad, or better or worse.

[@mrx1278]

Unless that same nurture and nature exist in the parallel universe you are talking about.

[@arkanasays]

@@mrx1278 yes, in that case, we may be identical. But that would also mean that every person that is present in your life or present nurture should also be there in the parallel universe so as to create an exact replica of the nurture. It is only then that we can be our exact version. But thinking about this, it seems highly unlikely because everybody's life is not controlled by us. Actually I thinl the whole perception of having our versions in parallel universes does not hold.

[@TNTsundar]

Let me ask you a question. If parallel universes are possible because of the different choices, can different universes collide in one or more dimensions if one of the forthcoming choices tend to bring the state to same result?

[@skw3384]

Max Tegmark is Ted Bundy from a parallel universe that pursued physics.

[@jorgenohlson8518]

Max t is from sweden. The land of the nobel prize.

[@petermoodie4892]

Interesting that I'm not alone in thinking.

[@iNREEk]

Ha

[@gilliansmith60]

- So does this mean that although i dont get to fuck Max Tegmark in this life....

[@ingenuity168]

I agree!

[@LalitKumar-cu5iu]

Imagine this guy playing lead in a time travel movie. Oscar

[@ibuprofen303]

2:22 - Gets from Robert De Niro to Bruno in one sentence. I'm impressed!

[@thewizzard3150]

drunks are very flexible.

[@muffin6369]

I have always loved loved loved Tegmark!! The cosmologists, quantum physicists are my rock stars NOW!!!

[@fredriksvard2603]

How are the level 1 ones parallell? Different parts of the same universe, just outside our observable one, no? When we move the limits move with us but we don't move from one universe to another. What am i missing?

[@rogerplessen5246]

Maybe. But there may also be other dimensions and realms hidden from us.

[@deeptochatterjee532]

I'm not sure what you mean by realms... You doing kind of like a quack saying that. But dimensions I completely agree, we could easily be living in a 4d brane of a larger dimensional universe

[@liloleist5133]

...the realm of ideas, thought, emotions...the dimension of love, soul, afterlife...

[@deeptochatterjee532]

@@liloleist5133 so BS

[@liloleist5133]

@@deeptochatterjee532 ,you've obviously not been there yet - it's okay to be inexperienced, however being ignorant is not.

[@ElBlancoPapi]

@@waffle8364 -- Doing mathematics or any science is just chemical reactions in your brain. So is ALL thought and action... just chemical and physical molecular reactions. What's your point?

[@steveowens398]

I don't understand why what you are describing are 'parallel' universes, or why they should be constructed any differently than our own universe (this last at around 4:15). 'Parallel' seems to imply a close relationship, but what you are describing (up to about 4:30 anyway) are just volumes of space too far away for us to perceive because of the limitations of the speed of light. Have you re-defined 'universe' to only include that which we can observe?

[@Core1138]

Maybe every partial in my body is quantum entangled with another version of me in a parallel universe and my consciousness can freely flow between them?

[@Drkwll]

No, too much particles, the entanglement would decohere.

[@dwolf2008]

Sound about right to me my awareness is the only thing that flows around in and out , left and right

[@justushall9634]

About 5:16, he says the equation for water has 3 solutions: solid, liquid, gas. Actually, more than 3: there are exotic ices, typically due to draconian pressure; often denser than liquid water. There is also supercritical fluid (too hot to be a liquid, too high-pressure to be a gas, so it is not really either); and at high enuf temperature, water molecules start to dissociate.

[@scoobyloo3157]

Apart from this amazing Tegmark video, can anyone tell me where I can get one of those inflatable universe balls? Searched the web to no avail.. cheers

[@jorgegomez524]

you just need to speak with your wife to know there are parallel universes

[@Natashahoneypot]

Jorge Gomez what if I don't have a wife?

[@barneyrubble957]

Jorge Gomez 😂

[@agriperma]

This comment made me crack up,

[@leonelmateus]

I tried to speak to my wifi and she asked for a password.

[@abloke8113]

If you hold that consciousness creates universes. Then WE ARE THE MULTIVERSE. each conscious entity creates a unique universe for itself. You cannot share my world Nor I yours. "educators" forever focus on the external. Peace. Kh

[@moondowg1]

Perhaps the parallel universes are based on action and equal and opposite reaction. We get a parking ticket in one universe and we do not in the other. Then there is one where we get a parking ticket and beat it in court and the one where we get the ticket and lose in court and so on. Perhaps each parallel universe is the result of the universe putting itself in balance. Based on this "action and equal and opposite reaction, the universe will always be creating new universes in order to attain the balance. Also, the people that we share this reality with may not be in our other reality or realities. We just use them to assist in the balancing act, when we need them. This may be the reason the universe has been expanding exponentially since the Big Balance, I mean the Big Bang. A sort of expanding universe and duplication based, on equal and opposite reactions. Every time it changes it must correct itself. Like a cell splitting in two and so on and so forth.

[@drzilman4536]

I love it, brilliant explanation.

[@mrx1278]

Perhaps

[@Drkwll]

What you are suggesting is not based on Newton's third law but the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics.

[@Wottan007]

Fascinating talk mixing physics and philosophy ! Thank you Sir !

[@ElBlancoPapi]

I wish he was my drug dealer!!

[@justeremiahsjourney]

What if making a quantum computer actually creates a new universe? What if each Universe is just the conception of one that was born when an AI reaches singularity? Each universe is really just a hologram created by a never ending line of previous AI back through infinity?

[@robertschlesinger1342]

Excellent video. Very interesting and worthwhile, and a must see video for everyone.

[@fluffy_dawn]

Who's here after the recent news on 2020? THIS IS SO INTERESTING TO ME

[@melissajimenez4799]

What news

[@aktw1234]

This is a great video and the idea was well presented. I was expecting pseudoscience but got something grounded in reality instead. Good shit

[@animistchannel2983]

The problem with parallel universes is that everyone who understands the ideas themselves knows that all 3 types "exist" whether we have machines that can "prove" them or not, and whether we are comfortable with the ramifications of that discovery or not. Thus, the ambition and the race is to find a way to design an experiment that could, in fact, falsify these ideas... and have it fail to do so. These are not new ideas. Certain practitioners particular esoteric arts have used them to affect "our reality" in very real ways for many thousands of years. The problem is that while these arts can be effective, they remain outside of science until that crucial scientific experiment is devised and run. Until then, the arts remain beyond the line of mystery, and it's in the best interest of all that the line be moved outward to include them. [You are seeing this sentence right now because that line was moved outward far enough to include "spooky action at a distance" i.e. quantum mechanics, that also turns out to be how stars actually work, by the spontaneous teleportation of atomic particles.] The frustrating part for scientists is that the practitioners of those arts are of little use in designing the experiment to explore them. This is not due to any disingenuousness or jealousy on the part of the practitioners, but because the functions of what is beyond the line of scientific discovery operates on different mechanisms than those same techniques would once they are within that line. The scientist requires a machine, an objective component. The artist operates on subjective super-consciousness. These are not in opposition. They are different. In the TV show "Medicine Men Go Wild" one of the twin doctors who hosted it described his frustration with that difference. They personally saw how a practitioner linked the activity of ants in a jungle to an infection in a girl who lived there -- apparently the worst kind of superstition to someone who is unfamiliar with emergent properties of complex dynamic interactive systems -- and yet in altering the state of the ants, the state of the girl was well resolved. His complaint (approx): "I can see the results. I can measure the results. It worked. Still, I don't understand what the activity of ant colonies has to do with a jaw infection in a teenage girl." He had done enough of this kind of research to recognize when there was science to do and a wall it had run up against; and to look not to disparage the wall, but to try to figure out a new way to apply the science. This is how great discoveries are made. In another episode, the same doctors made this observation on such processes that had successfully gone from art to science in another case (approx): "Today, we used a modern medicine derived from a folk remedy in China, to cure a disease in a child in the jungle of Africa." They understood how such apparently nebulous connections can lead to reliable outcomes for the betterment of all.

[@mrx1278]

Do not disparage the wall, rather find the door...

[@animistchannel2983]

​@@mrx1278 You have that exactly right. Say, have you heard the song "Sitting" by Cat Stevens? He put in one of my favorite lyrics: "Life is like a maze of doors, and they all open from the side you're on. Keep on pushing hard, boy, and try as you may, you're gonna wind up where you started from." In every box of mirrors, there is a door... maybe it's "The Door Into Summer" as Robert Heinlein put it. So often the trick to moving the line of mystery, to taking what was mysticism and turning it into a science, means that for a while you have to find that door to open towards you, to let the weirdness in for a while. Sometimes, if you're lucky and careful, you can (even as a human) let it translate itself and draw you forward with it. By this "letting in" have some learned to accept the simple truth they find before them -- even it if defies conventional definitions of their day -- and let it resolve into a new level of scientific reality. Most rare is one who can do this trick twice in the same lifetime. Of course, cats do this all the time. The problem with cats, though, is that they don't care what it means. They already know they are dreaming, so they don't expect it to make sense to anyone else. This is why we are having to build the rocket ships for them :)

[@mrx1278]

@@@animistchannel2983, What a remarkable thing to find a working mind with depth and obvious intellect. I applaud your post my friend, Well said! Yes I do know the works of Cat Stevens and really like how you worked that bit into the conversation. Cheers mate!

[@ElMarlboroMan]

Ive always wondered how do you have a equation for a unsolved problem? Couldnt a variable be wrong but the math come out right for the problem the new variable added?

[@patrickodonovan5066]

Thank you for this. Entertaining, accurate, and helpful.

[@truthisall]

HE JUST EXPLAINED THE IMPOSSIBLE SO SIMPLE ! RESPECT SIR 😎👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

[@adriancook9742]

I have read all the comments and watched this video. I think the main the for us all is to keep an open mind.

[@Only1INDRAJIT]

Ok, but not so much open like your grammar mate

[@chuckschillingvideos]

But the physicists don't seem to have an open mind. As far as they are concerned, this is it and too bad for the rest of us they can't prove a damn thing.

[@excitingleopard6976]

@@chuckschillingvideos Next up: are physicists, mathematicians, astronomers and theorists a total waste? And should we discount everything they have to say? A random KZbin commenter weighs in! And after that, it's an all-new special edition of "Quarantined Mind: I Live Under a Rock, and So Should You!"

[@mrx1278]

@@Only1INDRAJIT Or your syntax..Just sayin

[@simimik.]

In all the parellel universes I came from this universe is the most unreal.

[@pepeg.luthier566]

What do you think about Quantum Healing Hypnotherapy Treatment (QHHT) kind of created by a hypnotherapist and bases on the concept of quantum healing expressed in the 1980s by Kepak Chopra? Does it have anything to do with Quantum anything?

[@luluplace2912]

Outstanding explanation and scientific view of where we are, and what is still to discover!!

[@tertommy]

I believe in Perpendicular Universes.

[@rochelledepalma4550]

Great how much longer until we get struck with another universe? Lol

[@thoughtvibes8397]

Amazing

[@SPohl-zy4rz]

Bordeaux universes where everything is slightly pinkish red.

[@antonves4419]

Max is one of the best minds of our time

[@conalcochranh3274]

According to Max, when you die, you waken up as someone else. Interesting theory.

[@ramalingeswararaobhavaraju5813]

Good evening Mr.Max Tegmark and Serious Science. Thank you so much for your good information.

[@Titan-ll9kn]

Wait..so if we aren't able to see the Light past 13.8b years ago, does this mean that Universe could be Older ?

[@jimmybrice6360]

dark energy and dark matter are not "discovered". a more correct terminology is that they are phrases used to state that we dont have a clue as to what it is !!

[@fuentesd2021]

In another universe the Twinkie cake is at the center and filling is on the outside.

[@cheaquettaj]

We have that in this Universe already it's called a 'Sponge Cake." 🤣🤣🤣

[@fuentesd2021]

@@cheaquettaj nice i cant wait to try it!

[@infotrad]

Why call then "parallel universes" if they are merely further away from us that our universe. I would call them "distant universes".

[@jaredfromspace]

Andre Nickell the universes might not be far from each other when you consider the scale. Another universe might be far from us as observers but it might be “parallel” to another universe. Also, this idea that universes may be separated by distance was only the first of three examples.

[@commanderthorkilj.amundsen3426]

Jared_DYC It all depends how one defines “universe.” If it’s all inclusive, no need for parallel or distant universes. We’re all contained in a glass bowl on top of some kid’s desk who chose us as his science project

[@jaredfromspace]

Heavy Mental Maybe man 😂 truth is stranger than fiction. Some things I still have trouble with though... like how people say there’s a good chance we live in a simulation. Going back to this vid, in the first example of parallel universes maybe it’s more like a space-time bubble. Maybe it’s not even traversable, aside from the crazy scales we’re talking about where you’d need something fantastic like FTL travel or worm holes to go these distances

[@pedrodiaz5540]

Fantastic , this is outstanding , absolutely interesting

[@LalitKumar-cu5iu]

If there is serious doubt about the existence of other universes, then why do we call our universe a uni-verse? Why not just "cosmos"?

[@marcheezy.]

Why aren't we in the same universe as the rest of the Tier 1s just because light doesn't allow us to observe them? Wouldn't that be like the days when we didn't have the technology to travel to other continents? We couldn't observe them at the time, but they were still on the same planet with the same rules of physics. Could someone explain why observation determines the edge of a universe instead of it's horizon?

[@shanephelan75]

our universe is based and built from consciousness..... our science proves this with the Slit experiment ( wave. vs particles, change when someone views test or not)....so that's why the reality is the way it is.

[@mrx1278]

We are not discussing OUR reality here, rather the possibilities of other realities existing.

[@TheChampionofthepeople]

Shit! This video just opened up a new perspective of life. This dude deserves the noble prize! ( and a like)

[@ras573]

I had an idea before that, There's a huge simple universe with only a few quantum laws, and somewhere in it is our oasis with physics.

[@JustinJoseph4952]

My idea was that, mood is probably linked to parallel universes for example mood swings in a person like it you see someone that's mad early on in the day and his mood changes later on( I think its like us and them just travelling through parallel universes without even knowing

[@Mardasee]

I have dissociative identity disorder and as a kid I use to think about this stuff. Some of the mental symptoms I experience I swear I'm tapping into parallel universes. Some of the memories I have of my past are fictional but so realistic I wonder did they take place within another parallel universe? What also happens to me at times, I've actually read about it in paranormal books and the symptom that I experience I will explain. One time while exiting a convenience store I began to experience the symptom as I walked past a candy shelf. A quick flash of silver color light happened. Sometimes this silver light lasts for some moments and it brings on a headache while other times like in the convenience store it happens quickly and there is no discomfort. All of the surroundings become sharp and brilliant to describe. When I was young and first began experiencing these symptoms, it shocked the living daylights out of me. I still remember a time when I was very young and it happened. I was on another earth I thought. Seriously I do remember much of my past like it had just happened and it becomes embedded into my memory afterwards and becomes difficult to forget. While walking past the candy shelf I noticed necco wafers but did not stop and continued exiting the store. Right before exiting the store I wanted something to munch on and so I turned and went back over to the candy shelf to grab the necco wafers. It was during these moments when the sharpness and brilliancy ceased and when I looked for the necco wafers they were not there and the other candies present looked different from before. This happens to me so many times in life I'm actually use to it. When I tell people about my experiences I'm just a kook they think. I also met schizophrenias during my life and they too are tapped into parallel universes. The voices they hear are from other schizophrenias from other parallel universes we theorize. But here too we are kooks when we tell people about it. And that is why some schizophrenias go mad and crazy at times, because nobody believes in them except for the others they meet in their heads from parallel universes and they too are mad and crazy because they are schizophrenia and nobody believes them. Unfortunately we also experience illusion which can bring on delusion and yes that is when we can go kooky. Chow.

[@mrx1278]

Wow...

[@DjDeja]

My career is in mental health. One of the reasons I went into it is because I have struggled with my own mental health and overcome it. I have theorized exactly what you just said about schizophrenia as well as other "mental illness." Maybe we aren't ill at all - we are tapped in.

[@victor-oq7dl]

Can anyone help me on this one , is there an alternative theory to explain how every possible event or outcome is actualised , do these many other universes exist in a separate section of space . To me the term parralell means existing alongside each other , in other words occupying the same space well not exactly the same maybe just MMs miles or whatever but in a sort of different dimension or time?? I do feel that all possibilities are actualised also past present and future all exist as one , how else could it be.

[@wirelessguyny3787]

7m30s - You have to love how he says LUCK and MIRACLE and stops short of saying Creator and says "Or what?' I'm always fascinated by scientists who like to quote Einstein but forget that he himself never believed that humanity was just some random occurrence.

[@SvPVids]

that guy is awesome

[@Benjamin93swe1]

Agree. Rational scientific reasoning combined with" imagination = genius

[@5tonyvvvv]

So atheists, God is absurd.... But unproven hypothetical infinite universes and vacuums are ok... Laughable!

[@hergersjogren]

Well one is predicted by very successful theories instead of just plain faith.

[@kyojin7750]

You know why they are called Theory? Because they cannot be proven!

[@kyojin7750]

"TESTED" - are you even listening to what the speaker said or just religiously believing your scientism? The speaker clearly said that these things cannot be observed!

[@rogerpedler8603]

WEL said max ......black holes form other universes,.ours came from a black hole singularity from another universe and this will repeat eternally.

[@rorschach_0474]

Is there a proof for this just asking.

[@catrowe6774]

Do you have a book or journal you have written about every possibility or would that be infinite as well? I would read it👍

[@thakeey4507]

What happened to the time machine? Can this be connected?

[@gregsmith1719]

I think you're ready to embrace the electromagnetic universe theory. The standard model is full of holes and dead ends.

[@tonyschofield4489]

There is a better video, in a parallel universe

[@torvilasulvstle362]

Hi Tony, I would like to tell you a time-travelling joke, but you did not like it...

[@billspoon6331]

Bet yer ass

[@jamesalexander3530]

I believe SpongeBbob is a god. All hail to the mighty sponge, creator of multi-Bikini Bottoms in parallel sea worlds where no parallel parking is permitted!

[@DragosMostenescu]

Good job, Max! Accurately and intuitively explained!

[@mikro7976]

U touched base of Albert Einstein equation of relativity. What if E=MC2 resembled in equation E for velocity equals M for minutes times C for centric to the 2nd dimension and as I looked at few notes I broke it down a little more. I'm not sure if I remember though.

[@jimpolk3553]

This stuff really REALLY blows my freaking mind. I can't wrap my head around it. If I start thinking hard about it, I literally start getting a headache.

[@GHELM-wp5yj]

The other universe ate my homework.

[@franciscahenri1713]

Who is watching this December 2019 ? 😍

[@gingerelvira6587]

I'm here Fran

[@franciscahenri1713]

ginger elvira it makes a lot of sense even after so many years 😃

[@kaz7378]

It's still delusions and pseudoscience

[@fruittronic9031]

i am and am intrigued

[@blcouch]

Does anyone else see Michael Fassbender in this guys face and mannerisms?😂

[@naxplast06]

Charlie Sheen 🤓

[@WJRHalyn-jw2ho]

I was thinking a younger Michael J. Fox......

[@sonofblessed]

I see John Stamos.

[@MR-ki8ud]

Greg Kinear

[@hmmlemeeshink]

What would it do for us to find out that there was another universe that we can never see or visit?

[@bownab]

That is because this gentleman who I admire, is one of the best . He talks passionately about physics, he loves it . He makes me to love it too. I like him

[@amberbento4972]

i am high and he is blowing my mind. can anyone relateeeeeee

[@rogue9464]

Next time you're in CT, let's hang, smoke and watch physics videos

[@SkateIslam]

Amberok yes

[@jeffb8437]

Drugs are bad mmm-kay

[@amberbento4972]

Rogue yessss but I’m in Australia where is CT?

[@joemart27]

I was here 9 mins ago in another universe looking at your comment

[@lovealien43]

The title is a bit misleading. He discusses three types of parallel universes but gives no direct evidence for parallel universes. The evidence is indirect and unconfirmed. He points to theories with proven properties and argues to take seriously that they also predict the possibility of parallel universes. Level 1 is based on the present understanding that physical interaction is limited by the speed of light. So our universe can be inscribed in a sphere extending as far as light from it was able to crawl since it came into being. If space is larger, than there might be places with which no interaction with our universe was possible yet. In that sense that place would be parallel. It is there, but too far away to feel it. Level 2 was inspired by different possible solutions to string theory. These would be places with different physical constants than ours. Not sure if these share the same space or are very far apart like with level 1. Level 3 was inspired by the mystery of the collapse of quantum mechanical wave function and the bold statement that e.g, in a double slit experiment, which has two outcomes, particle through slit 1 or slit 2, the universe splits into two, one with first and one with second outcome. Interesting enough that one might have a bit of evidence. David Deutsch argued that there are cases where energy suffices only for one photon to pass the slits, and he speculates that it interferes with a particle from a parallel universe.

[@GenesisReveal]

He presents firm evidence for level 1 parallel universes, and admits the evidence becomes a little shakier when we progress to level 2 and level 3 universes. The key evidence available so far is that if the theories accurately describe observable reality, we can assume that the same theories accurately describe that which we cannot observe.

[@lost4468yt]

Only universes with life in them would be able to ask that question, so it doesn't really make sense to ask. Also if you tweak the higgs and remove a quark and add a new particle, you don't know that life won't be able to exist there. All you know is that our form of life will not be able to exist there. It's *really* easy to generate mathematical models which support turing machines, so atleast those universes (which is probably most) should support life, whether they can generate it or not is another question (too hard to start, no way to form evolutionary selection pressures, machinery complexity increases far too quickly, etc.)

[@Perf401]

I agree. "Why are we so lucky to have universe that have such good laws and constants to support life?" - that question would ask an intelligent living being in one of the potential infinity amount of universes. But nobody is asking questions in a universe that has no life in it, because only intelligent life can ask questions. Simple. And we have no idea if there are different types of life even in our own universe. Life in other universes can be complitely different.

[@jboogeyboo4268]

The way these Mandella effects are, one could argue we jumped over somehow into level 1 parallel universe. Where history is a little changed.

[@thomasfluskey5922]

2012 may explain it somethings been off.

[@atahulpa3584]

How do we test your theories ...