Evolution Denier Tries to Debunk Google!

[@TazorNissen]

“Google is still using the same old tired proofs for evolution.” “I don’t change my slides because truth doesn’t change.” I wasn’t prepared for that level of irony..

[@Bollibompa]

HAHAHA!

[@shaneeslick]

Yeah, I noticed that too 🙄

[@flavius7524]

It's pure torture to hear him talk

[@mihaicolceriu-nicola7148]

loled so much at that :))))))))))

[@D-Vinko]

I hate this idea. "Clearly I'm right because the information I'm providing never changes, and it never will." This sounds like a great excuse to people who don't actually understand how knowledge works, knowledge is accumulative. There is higher odds of you getting hit by a bus, while winning the lottery, while being struck by lightning, twice, than to get the answer to a question THIS BIG on your first try. We are going to assume that the very first explanation you made was the right one, and no new information could ever be added on? The idea that an unchanging theory is a good one is preposterous; and has time and time again been demonstrated to be EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE. The more willing a theory is to adjust it's model according to new information, the more likely it will survive, and evolve the scientific consensus, the less fluid models which do not accept new information always fall short, or are overtaken by theories which do accept new information; especially those studies built upon previous information from other reliable studies, which feed more information into the theories we all use today (Computers, phones, geolocation, and the very same technology used to espouse creationist talking points, the internet) all rely upon theories which get better as new information is provided them.

[@SwiftCreationStudio]

"DNA Kent, You can't argue with that" Kent: *_You underestimate my stupidity_*

[@ulipeterson6112]

"i'm not prepared for that."

[@budd2nd]

Velocity your message made my actually laugh out loud. Brilliant 👍👍👍

[@SwiftCreationStudio]

@@budd2nd I gotta say I wasn't prepared for that. Now I feel great because I made someone laugh!

[@glenecollins]

Kent has been playing limbo with intellectual bars since before most of us were born. He is always the better idiot.

[@andrewstoddard6717]

@@glenecollins aren't the bars to be jumped over?

[@joshk3273]

Sooo... His argument is like this: "I have no idea what I am talking about, therefore you are wrong." A real genius

[@standoughope]

Correction: "I have no idea how biology functions, therefore it's a lie"

[@christianege4989]

This does apply not only to him, but to all conspirtards, no matter if it is evolution, ISS hoax, moon landing hoax, flat earth,........

[@joshk3273]

@@christianege4989 ...or all of the above.

[@zeeksthegoblin7564]

AKA Kent Hovind Effect.

[@rolandgunslinger37]

Sounds like most discussions (which quickly devolve into arguments) today.

[@shok24199]

Kent mentioned that dogs produce dogs...except that selective breeding has produced dogs that are vastly different from their ancestors. If it's possible to have a dog breed change so much in the span of centuries (or even less, in some cases), imagine what could happen if you expanded that timeframe to millennia or even millions of years.

[@Alysm-Aviation]

of course he dislikes google, it contains a full record of his legal problems. Very christian.

[@dwightk.schrute8696]

not sure what's worse though, creationist or google fanboi?

[@Alysm-Aviation]

@@dwightk.schrute8696 google has a use, creationist does not. Duckduckgo is even better.

[@dwightk.schrute8696]

@@Alysm-Aviation creationists are useless , google is dangerous

[@Alysm-Aviation]

@@dwightk.schrute8696 google is dangerous in the hands of an idiot. Shame that there is so many idiots.

[@spazbog123]

@@dwightk.schrute8696 Google is a tool. Any tool can be misused. A hammer is for nailing things together in the process of building things but can also be used to break things, cause harm or ultimately kill someone. It is time to stop blaming tools and start blaming the people who misuse them.

[@jetlag1488]

"This is from Google." No, Kent. That's from a website that Google links to. Google is a search engine, not a publisher.

[@fangeo]

THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@irrelevant_noob]

And i was considering making this same argument, until at 10:23 he actually acknowledged that bit was from PBS and *_NOT_* from Google. So he knows, he just doesn't care to be honest about it.

[@eknaap8800]

He's so stupid, he doesn't know that.

[@ottonormalverbrauch3794]

"When I taught math, two plus two was four"... And that was about the pinnacle of Hovind's scientific understanding..

[@wormhole331]

The pinnacle of his teachings.

[@gowdsake7103]

Only if he used his fingers

[@dogwalker666]

He probably argued about that too.

[@trevormillar1576]

He'll never make it as an accountant.

[@rickpapineau5939]

Kent Hovind: "give me the evidence... no, I don't believe that. Give me the evidence I want... no, I don't believe that either." Kent Hovind, when asked for definitive proof God exists: "the Bible says..." Uh-huh.

[@nenmaster5218]

The Learning never ends, so call it silly, but i do have the hobby of asking people if i an recommend them Science-channel or just Education-channel in general to them! Mind if i do?

[@TravisW888]

God: “Kent, evolution is real and part of my creation!” Kent: “You idiot, it isn’t in the Bible is it? You are wrong God!”

[@Zahnzak]

How do you know the Bible is true? "Cause the Bible says it is"

[@dumbledumb6325]

At least he was honest when pointing out that DNA is “beyond comprehension” for him.

[@AngelEmfrbl]

A broken clock is correct twice a day though...

[@davyc412]

Maybe a bit beyond comprehension for Dan too :p . DNA is NOT made out of protein. It's a ribose (in the case of DNA its missing one oxygen and thus a deoxyribose ) sugar with a nucleotide base. There is no protein in the basic structure of DNA. You only get proteins involved when you begin to look at superstructure of DNA like histones. or the transcription or replication machinery, or if you start to look at regulatory elements that bind to the DNA. Many of these things are protein but the DNA itself is not

[@cygnustsp]

@@davyc412 thanks, this is why even science communicators need to be careful

[@gowdsake7103]

I think that includes a LOT of things

[@EdwardHowton]

He meant the letters. Kent Hovind is functionally illiterate. I _believe_ that his nine years in jail included some attempt to finally teach him how to read, but he has never been known to read or write anything for himself prior, and even bragged (lied, like he always does) about "reading at a 5th grade level" when he also claimed to be a science teacher in the homeschool he founded for his church's victims' children. Kent doesn't understand words nor letters.

[@jurassicjack3320]

Everything about Kent annoys me because I have actually talked to people like him and let's just say I am appalled at a large portion of societies ignorance.

[@SadFemboy]

My brother is like this, it's hard to handle when I see him

[@thunderflare59]

Odd that they aren't as critical of the Bible. I believe Jesus really walked the Earth, but admit the missing documentation of his execution among other things leaves room for doubt.

[@shaunelliott8583]

Consider how stupid the average person is, and then remember that half the population are even more stupid than that

[@smashexentertainment676]

@@thunderflare59 science promotes criticism. Questioning bible is a big no-no.

[@jurassicjack3320]

@@shaunelliott8583 Yes exactly, it is quite frightening how many stupid people there are in society.

[@stopmojim]

I was unfortunate enough to be educated in the southern US from middle school on. My "science teacher" and I use that label loosely for that man, told us to skip the chapter in our text books on evolution because he did not believe in it. Even as a child, I sat shocked with my mouth agape as he instructed us to turn to the next chapter. I made it one of my life's purposes to learn all I could about science.

[@jasonwiggins]

I was born and raised in the South and that didn't happen to me.

[@Gapines23]

It appears you skipped sections of grammar as well

[@Dutch_Vander_Linde_]

​@@Gapines23No, you just skipped past the chapter on reading comprehension.

[@michaelawford7325]

Seemed quite good everyday grammar to me, where do you claim he was ungrammatical?

[@nothere7198]

Hovind : "DNA is so complex !" Hovind : "Here's a 6 minute KZbin video that explains it all." ...shs.

[@dunningkrueger8932]

Maybe it does

[@jimd9339]

@@dunningkrueger8932 Abbreviated explanations are beyond the evo mindset... They do know how to mock and ridicule anyone who disagrees with their silly debunked hypothesis... Civil debate? Nope. They think that mockery and ridicule wins the debate! It only demonstrates their weak position!

[@dunningkrueger8932]

@@jimd9339 Listen Buddy...we could argue.... But that wouldnt bring us far. Fact is, that one day, you gonna die. The question is, if God exists, were will you go? Einstein, Louis Agassiz , James Dana, John Dawson, George stokes, Charles piazza smyth , Rudolph virchow, Phillip h gosse, Gregor Mendel, Louis Pasteur, Henri Fabre, William Thompson, lord Kelvin, Joseph Lister, Joseph clerk Maxwell, Bernhardt Riemann, John bell petigrew, George romances, Richard Owen Edward Hitchcock, sir Henry rawlinson, sir Joseph Henri Gilbert, Thomas Anderson, sir William abney, Rendel short, l Mersin Davies, Cecil p.g wakeley, Leonardo da Vinci, johann Kepler, Francis bacon, Blaise pascal, Robert Boyle, Nicholas Copernicus, Isaac Newton, William Hershel, Michael faraday,Samuel miller, Benjamin Barton, Timothy Dwight, Galileo, William Mitchell Ramsey, Werner von Braun, A. Render Short, john Ambrose Fleming. They all couldnt deny, that there has to be a God. If all of them say, scientificly, that there has to be a God, why not search for him? If the christian God is true, you are in real trouble....

[@jimd9339]

@@dunningkrueger8932 HINT: I am a Christian.... I will be with my Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ when I die! Philippians 1:21

[@dunningkrueger8932]

@@jimd9339 Alright, I propably missunderstood ya... then we'll see us in heaven, then we`ll talk.

[@KH-mx7bg]

*Me watching this video while eating breakfast before going to work at a genetics lab* “DNA is beyond comprehension.” Well cheers Kent, I guess I’ll just go back to bed then.

[@mangojulie123]

DNA is beyond comprehension indeed ... TO KENT!

[@fjccommish]

Make some from nothing.

[@irrelevant_noob]

@@fjccommish a bit heavy on the hidden assumptions there? You didn't even bother to DEFINE that nothing you're talking about, you didn't care to explain why it even matters, and lastly why should we spend any amount of effort trying to perform magic tricks only for your benefit?

[@KH-mx7bg]

@@fjccommish I make DNA in the lab everyday from free base pairs, heat, and polymerase. You know, like in nature.

[@Fleato]

Got to love that because they don't understand it means that no one can.

[@sourisvoleur4854]

When a "missing link" (intermediary form) is found, creationists say "two new holes in the fossil record discovered"

[@nenmaster5218]

Idea: Lets use the reportbutton to fight Kent Hovind and with that fight Anti-Science? I mean, regardless of all chanes, i think it's worth a try, especially as it's really quick.

[@magnetiktrax]

Kent's nonsense worked well for him before the days of the Internet when he could gish gallop his way through every discussion. Now he's getting hammered by debunkers left, right and centre.

[@Kualinar]

... front, back, above and bellow, and every direction in between.

[@JohnnysCafe_]

It's rather scary to think that someone who could not pass grade 3 science has such an influence over so many

[@adamboyen4727]

He also claims to have multiple PHDs

[@albino5995]

I wonder where he printed them off from 😂

[@sourisvoleur4854]

@@albino5995 - He got his PhDs from HPU

[@atlas1924]

@@albino5995 a church cult

[@twilightparanormalresearch186]

He actually did teach school.

[@GDTGaming]

"Chickens have a lot of eggs and when they hatch guess what they turn out to be?" "Breakfast?" "Chickens!" Oh right, dinner. My bad.

[@annk.8750]

Apparently in Hovind's world, roosters and bulls don't exist...

[@siwilson1437]

"Same old tired arguments" says the guy waiting for Jesus to return for 2000 years ahahaha

[@albino5995]

We all know that even if Jesus was real and he did return, he would be killed again by these same morons who have been waiting for him because ‘heresy’ 🙈 religion is a wonderful thing 😂😂

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@albino5995 Someone should make a short film about that - you are bang on!

[@alexalbuquerquerodriguesal108]

@@albino5995 You know, that doesn't seen far off given the state of Christianity currently (and historical facts like how the Catholic church used to burn people if you dared to give a different interpretation of the Bible than what It was given by the priests in the Medieval Era)

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@alexalbuquerquerodriguesal108 Right, need the script by next week, then we start shooting on the following Sunday. 😎

[@alexalbuquerquerodriguesal108]

@@JB-yb4wn Now thats a plan

[@happalula]

every time i see that deluded grandpa i get the feeling he tricked the caretakers and skipped taking his medicine... its so sad what he is trying

[@tiuhti__]

It's simple, he just can't or doesn't want to understand evolutionary science. It's sad, actually

[@DjVortex-w]

"Animals only produce their own kind." "True. That's the reason why birds are cladistically classified as dinosaurs." "Ridiculous!"

[@erikblaas5826]

Kent H : Animals reproduce after their own kind... Me : Ehmmmm, Kent ?? Only after ???? Not before ???? Yep , me cherry picking on words ... lol....

[@user-gk9lg5sp4y]

Kent reproduces after his own kind. Mentally challenged yet arrogant charlatans

[@srikar6480]

Evolutin isn’t real. But Evolution is real.

[@watfordjc]

I believe the chicken and the egg debunks this. Chickens are selectively bred (in some cases) for egg production or bigger breasts. Sooner or later the thing that hatches will not be of the same kind. Of course, you could always argue cauliflower (Brassica oleracea) and broccoli (Brassica oleracea) are the same thing.

[@xnoreq]

Ask him for a scientific/biological definition of "kind". Not examples, but a proper definition.

[@bobiboulon]

"I'm not sure if he was prepared for that" :'D

[@ralfhaggstrom9862]

I`m not prepared for that ................

[@HarryMudd]

🤣🤣🤣 That's his motto 🤣🤣🤣

[@jaybeemhardscrote7466]

Zing

[@ClawsandPawsOfficial]

Evolution today.. an Australian researcher has released a paper saying humans have experienced a micro evolution as we now have an additional artery in our arms. This is people comparing 1880 till now and 20% more people have this artery.. that is observable within known history!?

[@eminence_front6043]

Not to mention more babies are being born without the ability to grow wisdom teeth.

[@brendenpeterson5684]

@@eminence_front6043 good, mine are bothering me like hell right now

[@todo9633]

Fascinating stuff, I wonder how many other changes will happen just because of our better diets and generally healthier lifestyles.

[@jaseimmitchell1145]

@@todo9633 I wonder how many changes will happen due to horrible diets in america

[@BSunE]

I agree with your point, but be careful of the term micro evolution, its a term invented by creationists to dismiss the process of evolution, by separating out the part that is evident. My understanding (although I'm 2 decades out of university) is this is not a scientific term. The development of an additional artery is an example of evolution.

[@randolphphillips3104]

His level of understanding of how the world works is clearly demonstrated when he claims Google has programmers creating all the content that is for evolution, then turns around and tells people how to google a video that he clearly states is made by someone else. The irony is so thick you could forge it into cutlery.

[@Steampunk_Wizard]

Did anyone else catch his incredible dishonesty at 6:00? The line reads "There is not one such fossil" yet he reads out "There is no such fossil" While a small difference, it changes the meaning so much. The original text (to the best of my knowledge), with emphasis on the word 'one' is implying that no single fossil can ever be called a "transition fossil" as every fossil is already a transition, due to the incredibly slow but steady pace of evolution. Because of this, the changes between species simply could never manifest in a single fossil, since that's just not how it works. The fossil record functions much like the set of real numbers in that regard. Sure, the number 7 could be considered a transition between 6 and 8, but we consider it it's own number. What about 7.5? 7.25?? -- All you end up doing is blurring the lines between arbitrary points with even more arbitrary points. Due to the nature of fossils, any one with significant differences between two species, is simply going to be called a new species. And that makes sense, considering it's kin probably lived for thousands of years before and after it, barely indestinguishable from itself. Maybe I went too far in depth? But I think that's the point. Legitimate scientists are smart enough to weave such a vast amount of meaning into so few words. Yet deniers like Kent either refuse to see it, or simply can't. They take the words out of context, strip them of their true meaning, and regurgitate them to make gullible people believe that real human scientists support these ridiculous bogus ideas like flat earth and anti-evolution.

[@EdwardHowton]

He's functionally illiterate, he doesn't know the difference.

[@lmoral222]

Great breakdown. Sadly, KH's loyal followers are not capable of this level of analysis.

[@builderdex]

Every fossil is either transitional or an evolutionary dead-end.

[@christiananderson8686]

Thank you for the detail, I'm not great at learning about stuff like this but I try, and that explanation helped me to get my head around it a littlw better. Much appreciated 🙏

[@robertbetz8461]

Great catch!

[@arcanics1971]

"When I taught math..." Is that like when you taught high school science for 15 years, but it was actually not in a high school, not science, and not for 15 years? Or is it how you earned a doctorate by paying a degree mill and wrote a dissertation that actually begins "Hello, my name is Kent Hovind..." Yeah, tell me more about your academic rigour, baby!

[@aidanclarke6106]

Pretty sure he got a PhD, as in Permanent Head Damage

[@richardneri9759]

I wonder what Kent thinks of those videos that show that 1+1=3.

[@Bollibompa]

@@richardneri9759 What videos?

[@erikblaas5826]

Yep, doctooor K. Hovind has a degree for reading 1 book. In any other field of education, just reading 1 book is not enough.... In any other field of education, you have to do actual research and testing.... In any other field of education, you have to come up with "background material", showing some of the sources from where this type of educative material is from.... Doctooor Hovind did not do that, he wrote a paper about the bible for a "university" that looks only towards the bible and nothing but the bible.. So he got a degree from an complete wothless education, from people who are complete worthless in educating other people other than "reading the bible". So doctooor Hoving wants to "educate" us in a field he has no education in himself, and expect us to beLIEve him on his word?!?!?

[@niallevans2375]

He used to say he was a science teacher.

[@thecaravaneer5652]

>google keeps showing the same tired old arguments >yeah i can keep saying the same thing because the truth doesn't change

[@nenmaster5218]

Idea: Lets use the reportbutton to fight Kent Hovind and with that fight Anti-Science? I mean, regardless of all chanes, i think it's worth a try, especially as it's really quick.

[@attila0323]

And he uses the same tired old arguments he has for every "debate" he has.

[@mistycrom]

My favourite part is where he pretty much describes a form of evolution that can be seen in action.. if two parents of different hair colours have a child, their child may have hair that is different to either parent. Or, in other words, the child will be a mild evolution from their parents. Also, see mixed-breeds of birds and dogs, or ligers as a very prominent example, being significantly larger than either lion or tiger parent. Not that any of that would be considerable as evidence of evolution at-all.

[@PinguWithAnAxe]

Kent: "Google are still pulling out the same old arguments for evolution" Also Kent: "I don't have to change my arguments because I'm right"

[@SinnerD2010]

ah yes, superiority complex with a splash of hypocrisy at its finest.

[@AngelEmfrbl]

No.... It's 'because I'm stupid but won't admit it'.

[@x-raf7652]

'Two plus two still equals four'. Actually it can also equal 100. There are 10 types of people that understand binary: 1. Those that do 2. Those that don't

[@Punderman11]

He doesn't seem to understand that saying "I'm right" over and over again does not make it so..

[@Punderman11]

@Son Of Cherve Except for the fact that Kent is obviously wrong... which makes his slides wrong.. Truth is determined by what the facts support. And the facts support evolution.. the facts do not support anything Kent has ever said.. Kent lacks the credentials to be considered an expert in any scientific field so why do you think him saying "I'm right" over and over again makes him correct?

[@bra24hnt52]

I admire Hovind for how confidently wrong he is. I'm not even that confident taking about things that I actually studied.

[@ronaldolson6553]

There's a name for that. It's the Dunning Krueger effect.

[@skelet8337]

Yes the more you know the less confident you are bcs you know that there is even more to learn

[@erikblaas5826]

@@skelet8337 .... as for the more I know ( in having knowledge of some subject ), the more I know ( realize ) that I do not know everything...

[@PixelatedH2O]

I'm not here to get into a debate and I know it's not a perfect analogy, but people who purely think something is created and can't evolve don't understand history. Music was created and has evolved -- we didn't suddenly go from Medieval chants to hip hop. Building styles have evolved. Language has evolved. Technology has evolved -- we didn't go from discovering the wheel to the internet in a week.

[@SebastianTombs]

God created the internet! "And on the seventh day He created the World Wide Web so that He could beat one out to some mom porn" Genesis 28:12

[@tma2001]

but their argument (and yours) is about Intelligent Design and does not apply. They rely on incredulity that evolution has no end goal in mind - which they deliberately confuse with 'random'.

[@icemediapro]

Actually, hip-hop is less advanced than medieval chants. Hip-hop and crap-rap took humanity backwards. That’s DE-evolution in process. That’s real.

[@Justwantahover]

And for their "intelligent design" argument: Cars started with the invention of the wheel and wasn't fully developed until the invention of the pneumatic tire. The car design evolved, it wasn't intelligently designed from scratch.

[@theroachoftheroachea9199]

No creationist that I know of has ever argued against the evolution of thought, design, or knowledge. I'm quite sure that creationist simply don't believe in the evolution of the physical form of humans and animals. Perhaps all the evolutionists are just racists like Darwin, believing that black people are closer related to apes than white people. That is about how logical your argument is.

[@WarDaddy8917]

How ironic it is that Kent says that evolution is a stupid imagination we think of. While he and his fairytale is soo so true

[@iterumconare4258]

Kent: Animals can't produce different types of themselves Also kent: so a baby born to a blonde mother may well be a brunette

[@fpszombie1]

Oh look, it’s “Dr. I’m not prepared for that”

[@SwiftCreationStudio]

It's Mr. I'm not prepared for that. get it right :P

[@grahvis]

@@SwiftCreationStudio . Don't be unfair, he paid good money for his PhD. Admittedly it's not worth anything, certainly not as much as it cost.

[@fpszombie1]

@@SwiftCreationStudio very true, my mistake :p As one who is planning to apply to research for an actual PhD, it annoys me that he calls himself doctor by buying one

[@SwiftCreationStudio]

@@fpszombie1 All of the degrees are from places that hold no value and I can't really say what he does or doesn't have in those terms (I just read the Wikipedia a while ago to check on his credentials and they won't even mention them because they aren't worth what he paid for them :P From what it said there he didn't even do his own research (Shocking, I could have sworn that they are did) but I wish you the best on yours

[@fpszombie1]

@@SwiftCreationStudio thanks :) and yeah, his research paper is up online. I’m pretty sure the first words in his introduction is “hi, my name is Kent Hovind”. There’s literally nothing that really is his apart from when he talks about himself. There’s no references, no bibliography, his thesis is too personal and the layout is a mess. If you wanna read it, just type Kent Hovind PhD thesis into google. You’ll find it on wiki leaks

[@julius5256]

The worst thing about Kent is not only himself, but who ever is laughing in the background too

[@brianchelette1336]

Dolts who cling to anyone saying the things they need to believe so they can sleep better at night. Kent’s a classic grifter.

[@hockema56]

One of his idiot offspring

[@Kalleron]

I really despise Kent and his giggling sycophants.

[@talandelana6873]

It's his employee. I laugh at my boss's jokes.

[@chris.eskimo]

He, and Mark Sargent, need to be shut down, PERIOD. Seriously. Many weak minded individuals waste their money on them. Their 'beliefs ' aren't simply opinion. They are committing FRAUD.

[@Nx2.1]

“Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, not those who know much who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.” - Charles Darwin

[@Ulvetann]

I am pretty sure I got more knowledge from reading Donald Duck as a kid.

[@glennkonklin2926]

His smugness is cringe worthy.

[@Psyberify]

Kent Hovind gives us endless entertainment.

[@NZSpides]

I’d say frustration more than entertainment, but I know what you mean.

[@tsopmocful1958]

The cringe oozes from him.

[@LadyNicola]

I memorized everything he taught. I have deleted my recycle bin and now I learn real Science. I can't believe the garbage I "learnt" from him

[@jonasaman9104]

Congratulations!

[@Nx2.1]

Well done, there's so much to learn.

[@aspirerl4807]

Awesome! I hope you have a good time on the path to real knowledge

[@andystokes8702]

Welcome back to the land of reality, it really is a wonderful place.

[@vestafreyja]

I'm sad that you learned "Science" from Kent - although to be honest if you didn't know the answer to a question you could always put "God did it!". But seriously learning real Science makes the world even more amazing. I'm currently reading Neil Subin's book Your Inner Fish: A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year History of the Human Body; it is not to technical, the writing is very readable and it explains in a manor that someone with a minimal science background will have no problem understanding. Those of us that have a science background will find the content equally educational.

[@MrKillerno1]

They should have asked Kent to play the role of that man on the toilet in the movie Jurassic Park!

[@horizon-highway]

“All you know is it died” that annoys me as someone going into Geology and who has worked on world famous paleontology dig sites in New Mexico.

[@vestafreyja]

My husband and I a number of years ago spent part of our summer vacation working on a dinosaur dig site for the Tyrrel Museum; what we uncovered were Duckbill Dinosaurs that appeared to have been caught in a rivers flood.

[@horizon-highway]

@@vestafreyja That’s so cool, that museum is up near Drumheller in Alberta Canada right? I went to the Atlas No. 3 Coal mine, the hoodoos and down towards Dinosaur Provincial Park but never did anything relating to paleontology there. It’s an unexpected place when traveling from Banff.

[@Alex_Mitchell]

@@vestafreyja I visited the Tyrel in 2019. What an absolutely fabulous place.

[@AC-gb7do]

“The “same old tired arguments...” Oh Kent, the irony is painful. For anyone who wants a laugh..rationalwiki.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind's_doctoral_dissertations

[@menmanamikaze1830]

Kent Hovind promotes himself as Dr. Kent Hovind or Dr. Dino. Prior to his 58 felony convictions and ten-year prison sentence, Hovind received a Ph.D. from Patriot Bible University, an unaccredited Christian college. Because of Hovind's use of the title of "Doctor" based on a degree from an unaccredited institution, legitimate scientists have closely examined his bona fides, including the work he submitted to fulfill the requirements for a doctorate. i- rotfl

[@Corrivalchain45]

oh. My. God

[@TheGarageLifedrums4u]

Is your profile pic a pic of Vaughn from community?

[@JD-ym2hg]

Good read. 5/5

[@thomasdadswell858]

@@menmanamikaze1830 I was surprised to find that on rational wiki they cite freaking Wikileaks has his leaked "Dissertation" from his fake Christian university if you want a laugh wikileaks.org/wiki/Young-earth_creationist_Kent_Hovind%27s_doctoral_dissertation

[@Garthdon]

Remember when Kent said you don't need to pay taxes, and he then went to jail for not paying taxes.

[@mihaitha]

No, he said *he* doesn't need to pay taxes.

[@wormhole331]

Member when he said he taught kids.

[@jaydeejohnson7]

Yeah! I member!

[@VyraFall]

I am just so speechless after every video on your channel. I mean, humans managed to understand so much of their nature and the one surrounding, we explored and found out, we created, invented and learned over thousands of years. And then there are people, who tell you that 1 kg is lighter than 1 g. How on earth can they be so awesomely foolish?

[@sabre0smile]

Why can't animals do this now? -Have you seen what dogbreeds looked like 100 years ago?

[@AngelEmfrbl]

'but their still dogs, they didn't become cats...' He is so predictable... You can literally predict his stupid answer because his arguments are always the same.

[@patricknelson]

“MiCrO eVoLuTiOn!”

[@LaneyTheOne]

Human intervention would be a good answer

[@dogwalker666]

Horses, cows and sheep would be totally different.

[@ilyaleytes1611]

@@LaneyTheOne yes artificial selection, using the tools of and mimicking natural selection.

[@Sandy.J.Lloyd.Sr.]

The comedian Bill Murray said it best, “it’s hard to win an argument with a smart person, it’s impossible to win an argument with a stupid person”.

[@zorrodahousecat9104]

That is a twisted quote from Mark Twain, Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

[@dancedecker]

And they don't come much more stupid than this idiot!!

[@user-gk9lg5sp4y]

And eventually other people won't be able to tell the difference

[@rhetoricalrobot8359]

If you're deferring to the stupid person as to who won the argument, you are the stupid person.

[@dancedecker]

@@rhetoricalrobot8359Er.. No, I think not...as I'd suggest the word you are actually looking for is "referring" to. Deferring is to put something off. Like... I am obviously deferring to learn better English. Lol. Classic. I'm "stupid", but you use totally the wrong word. Love it. Lol. Absolutely wonderful. I don't think we really need to say anymore now do we? I thank you. Oh that's just absolutely brilliant. Lol.

[@mitchellconner6928]

"I'm not sure he was prepared for that..." Well played, Dan.

[@elcarpe9186]

Kent vs. Google...? I'm so not prepared for that. - love a great backhanded call-back - especially when it slaps the stupid out of a fools mouth.

[@etherealessence]

Truly and amazing dig

[@theeagle3948]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i36bY6SurdiekKc

[@WIDGI]

@@theeagle3948 Hahaha! Standing at the Grand Canyon, "we see no signs of erosion"! Wow.

[@blahblingo7605]

he wasnt prepared for that. he. was. not. prepared. at. all.

[@hiaosengvilay9107]

This guy just loves to hear his own voice. Even if the facts hit him in the face Kent will deny it

[@thorfinnmckenzie]

Kent's logic makes as much sense as the color 3 smelling like purple..

[@slate613]

Wait, I thought it smelled like green. I'm so confused. . . 🤣

[@MrMturko44]

when I eat my color 3, it taste like wood and dirt

[@barrylangille3523]

Given that synesthesia is a thing, the color 3 smelling like purple makes more sense. Kent's just a liar playing his shtick for money. I've come to the conclusion that he really is a fraud, plain and simple.

[@ryantoth676]

@@barrylangille3523 as someone with Synesthesia, I can confidently tell you 3 is brown. He's also pretty chill.

[@Nawmps]

@@ryantoth676 I'd respectfully disagree, 3 is a nice deep, vivid green. The smell of banana is a wavy brown pattern though!

[@falsetitle6940]

There are two kinds of people: people who know that evolution is real and people who don't understand evolution.

[@terryglenweaver]

Try this as it has been my stance... Evolution is true except where it attempts to disprove Creation. When Evolution tries to disprove Creation it then must produce a base. The big bang theory is a base but easily disproved. Evolution with Creation as a base (and that means Creation via God) works. Any other method does not work.

[@falsetitle6940]

@@terryglenweaver There is no proof of creation therefore it doesn't need to be disproven.

[@terryglenweaver]

@@falsetitle6940 Ahhh, but there is substantial proof of Creation, because of lunacy, the denial without evidence is given validity... you know, your type of denial. In fact, proof of evolution is disproved each time someone tries to defeat creation using evolution as you are proof evolution is non-existent. Your denial proves you have not evolved.

[@Emperorhirohito19272]

@@terryglenweaver no one tries to “defeat” creation with evolution. Evolution describes how life changes, it makes no claims whatsoever on how it began. It seems you fall firmly into the camp of “doesn’t understand evolution”😂

[@terryglenweaver]

@@Emperorhirohito19272 Yeah I've heard that arguement before, and many times. Y'all should rethink your stance as claiming to know nothing about everything is not a display of intelligence. As for me, I do not claim ignorance. I certainly believe in evolution except when it counterdicts God. Here I will give you the best reasoning possible to seek the One True God. First, Prophecy is proof of God. Claiming you cannot understand Prophecy is just another act of trying to use ignorance to prove intelligence. I am NOT trying to offend you! I am trying to educate you for your safety and the safety of people you care about. Please read Revelation Ch 13 and align it with Today and this COVID-19 perils. COVID-19 is not a name, it is a mathematical equasion and it's total is shown in Revelation Ch 13. Do not accept any vaccines for COVID-19 or any of its variants. The Mark of the Beast may have already been passed to people who accepted any Vaccines for COVID-19 or its variants. Can you prove that you were given a COVID-19 Vaccine from a vial and not a pre-filled syringe? Consider the abilities of Satan... Is it possible that these injections contained an RFID Chip much smaller than what we have been shown? Also, is it possible that no matter where an RFID Chip is injected, that this could be a Smart Chip that relicates itself into one's hand or forehead? Personally I do not really believe that current and past COVID-19 (and its variants) vaccinations contained an RFID Chip. However, I am just as certain, its coming. As these Variants develop the situation becomes more dire. They started right out of the gate with Identifiers for people who got Vaccinated and that progressed to Fake Vaccine cards. Israel emulated the same parameters displayed in Revelation Prophecy Ch 13. Soon the restrictions for those remaining un-vaxed will elevate to crimes and punishments for anti-vaxers. Notice the Vax promoters do not even slightly delve into COVID-19 and Prophecy. Everyone who receives the Mark of the Beast will go into perdition with the Beast. You must do diligent research into exactly what is going on and where it is going. Time is crucial and time is becoming more-so. If you want my help, just ask.

[@HarryMudd]

EVERYTHING is rocketscience to Ken.

[@gertjanvandermeij4265]

kenT

[@NS-ks5qc]

It certainly is not rocket science, it's paleontology

[@ChilePicanteWey]

This man makes me feel sad, but at the same time I can't stop laughing at him. He is the human with most self overrated inteligence I know.

[@SysterYster]

The more stupid you are, the smarter you think you are, because you cannot fathom how much more there is to actually learn about a subject. So stupid people overestimate how much of the whole they know. Intelligent people tend to do it the other way round. They realize how much more there is to know about a subject, and think they know less of the whole than they do, and so they think they're less knowledgeable. Funny that.

[@ChilePicanteWey]

@@SysterYster funny and sad, but true.

[@nasapayrollsystem8701]

When Kent says “ is that the best You Guys can come up with “ Is he referring to the finest minds, geniuses and centres of learning since the beginning of man, from all parts of the globe, each year building on the previous work to date and thereby improving it ? And all them people, past present and future . Are wrong ... Against the might of ..🤔... Some unqualified guy .. on KZbin .... Which one would you choose to believe?

[@mitchellconner6928]

saying yes to that being the best we can come up with is still inaccurate. Because we aren't making answers up, we follow evidence, facts, and logic and those are the results of the hard work of geniuses over decades and centuries. Not 5 minutes of looking at a rock or an afternoon reading religious texts.

[@nickfifteen]

Dunning-Kurger at its finest. What's even more frustrating is how NOT mutually exclusive Religion and Science is. Nowhere does it say that Evolution denies God, and even the Genesis Creation story (if one wants to believe in it) says that life came from the seas, which sounds like Evolution to me. ... er, not that the Genesis Creation Story is in any way factual, as much as a Evolution can very easily fit into that belief system. ANYWAYS... Oh, here's another good one: Kent Hovind thinks "evolutionists" teach that we evolved from a rock... but he has no problem believing in the Genesis Creation story that explicitly states that God created Adam by breathing life into a pile of literal dirt. So... evolving from rocks is nonsense, but created from dirt isn't? I can't wrap my head around that one: if he has no issue with the latter, then surely the former would not violate his belief system, right??

[@leftpastsaturn67]

@@nickfifteen Yeah, but you're forgetting their handy get out of jail free card... 'it's god innit, he can do whatever he wants'.

[@rhetoricalrobot8359]

KZbin! I can count to potato.

[@fjccommish]

He's referring to the nonsense arguments and so called proof. You find a bone in the dirt, and you claim that proves life evolved from rocks and that mosquitoes and elephants have a common ancestor.

[@matthewmeehan9155]

Shame his prison time didn't knock any sense into him

[@michaelmalone1624]

His whole argument for Noah's Ark states that Noah did not have 2 of every animal but, 2 of every kind. ie... 2 dogs that EVOLVED into all the breeds and wolves, 2 horses that EVOLVED into many different mules, quarter horses, Arabians etc.

[@MsNightblitz]

Kent will be my first subject on my 'Find a Felon' show.

[@wolfieinu]

"The people writing the software are lying" Imagine being a whole (fake) PhD and not knowing the difference between software and content

[@BlackburnBigdragon]

He's obsessed with going after evolution constantly because it makes him $$$.

[@octopusgoodness1909]

It's this kind of person that makes all us religious people seem like a bunch of dunderheads.

[@0cgw]

Hey-Hey-Hey, it's Kent the Klown. Let us not forget his latest book, "How to Prepare for a Debate" by K. Hovind (ISBN 06542-017, Escambia County Jail Press).

[@ilyaleytes1611]

I wonder when his book “I did not commit tax fraud” going to come out. What I don’t get is, he gets his butt kicked in every debate and yet still goes out and picks fights. Does he enjoy public humiliation?

[@heatshield]

". . a Prah-gresh-SHAWN of Ehvil-Lou-SHAHN " My gahd, can't this guy just say words right?

[@wanderingprophet3948]

That manner of speaking on his part is for two reasons. 1. It’s his only method of emphasising a topic, since he knows nothing beyond that. 2. It triggers all the brainwashed kids to react or they face his ‘wrath’. Conditioning 101

[@darkyboode3239]

The craziest evolution denier ever who was even sentenced to ten years in prison from being convicted of failure to pay payroll tax.

[@MonkeyJedi99]

Imagine 'debunking' the equivalent of a strangely re-sorting card catalog while not daring to crack open a single one of the non-fiction books.

[@john-jw1jx]

Not even 2 minutes in and we got a yodel, man I love these vids

[@gaellafond6367]

2:24 "When I thought Math, 2 + 2 was 4" Then tell me, Kent, why 2 + 2 is 0 when you file your taxes...

[@Loofrewop]

" He dodged that and decided to debate Consiparcy Catz instead. I'm not sure he was prepared for that" Ha, I got that reference!

[@callmedavid9696]

I love how all his material references text books from the 80s and 90s...

[@jasmijnariel]

Or stuff from 300y ago as well... sometimes he does🤣

[@TheDupacz]

I'm doing masters degree in archeology this year, and I love hearing crazy people trying to deny the evolution, witch is kinda subject of my professional interests. One thing I love even more than that is hearing crazy people deny that Earth is a Globe. Thank You Dan, for providing me, and many of my Professors many of laughs. Keep on doing what you do, and stay safe. Cheers!

[@heatshield]

" D N A, Woah!" Good argument, Kent. " published a couple months ago, WOAH!" Nicely done, Kent.

[@Maerahn]

'Dr' Kent the Incompe-tent needs a new slogan. I suggest he adopts the one occasionally used by Adam Savage - "I reject your reality and substitute my own!"

[@firesondiego7666]

Evolution is the best explanation for man’s origin given the evidence we have. Period.

[@DaveJonesActor]

Let’s be honest, Kent isn’t a good case for evolution.

[@bushmasterflash]

Kent is good evidence that evolution doesn't have any specific outcome goals and can go any direction.

[@ianchenofficial]

He’s proof of “genetic entropy”. There you go. It’s actually true!

[@Blazs120gl]

Well, he's got a son just as dumb and arrogant, a great example of contra-selection.

[@ki5aok]

Kent is an example of a gene pool that needs some serious amount of clorine.

[@wormhole331]

Actually he's a very good case because the vast majority of the time mutations in genes arent a benefit.

[@SlideRulePirate]

Creationist Kid: Doctor Kent! Doctor Kent! I've found a fossil, what can you tell me about it? Doctor Kent : It died. Creationist Kid: Whoa... You're so smart Doctor Kent.

[@glenhughes8013]

1:10 "Google are presenting the same,old, tired arguments." 2:10 "I don't have to change my arguments because they are right. Truth doesn't change." Typical Hovind B/S. 😂

[@nicmost3044]

Brown hair is dominant over blond hair. Everybody knows that, but I still don't know DNA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!???????????????????????

[@greatestscott6599]

POLICE: You're under arrest. HOVIND: No they _don't_ . POLICE: ... ? *"I looked at water in July. I know it won't change in December - ice is a myth."*

[@thephoenixking1086]

But Computers are made of Calculus, and Maths is how we know Metal is liquid.

[@russelltodd5255]

@@thephoenixking1086 "and that is how we know the world to be banana shaped" Monty Python

[@thephoenixking1086]

@@russelltodd5255 Banana Theory - Still better than Flat Earth

[@RealityCheckThat]

According to Kent Hovind (I refuse to call him Doctor) his son should look exactly like him and I and my brothers should look exactly like our father. The very fact that we don't look exactly like our fathers and mothers confirms evolution! Small, almost unnoticeable, changes over time.

[@Tjalve70]

According to Kunt Hoe-Wind (AKA Kunt Queefer), you can't have brothers unless they are your twins. Because your father and mother must have died the moment you were born. Since something can't come from something else, and that something else still existing. After all, humans can't have come from chimps, because there are still chimps.

[@hans-joachimbierwirth4727]

Especially those chimps our ancestors came from. I mean in person. Just look for old chimps. I mean very old chimps. As in very, very, very, very (and so on) old chimps. Lol...

[@randomname6710]

I love how his quotes are from before we even had the internet lol. Like my dude we're trying to colonize mars with re usable rockets and a space station on the moon.

[@BoneySkylord]

If you rubbed Kent Hovind's nose in one of his own turds he would insist it was chocolate.

[@princestevenii.772]

Kent Hovind the Tinfoil Gent.

[@JohnDlugosz]

It's hard to imagine that Kent scoffs at Flat Earthers, when by all rights he should be one of them. He scoffs at plate tectonics and geology in general, believes Genesis 1 is literally true, but somehow Earth is a sphere floating in empty space at the same time as all that "waters below", "waters above", "firmament", etc.

[@morpheon_xyz]

Well not every Bible believer is a flat earther you know. Flat earthers take the Bible out of context just as they take science out of context, so nothing new there

[@patricknelson]

The one amazing thing about science is that it’s generally *very* consistent. Unlike these folks.

[@Elios0000]

he knows what he says are lies but justifies it by that he has to lie to convert people and more so targeting CHILDREN and that this makes his lies ok... he is nothing more then a con man

[@Jermbot15]

It's all about demographics. The Flat Earth pond is all fished out and he doesn't want to have to go up against big names like Nathan Thompson.

[@Justwantahover]

Believing in a 6,000 year old earth is the same sort of ignorance as believing it's flat.

[@user-gk9lg5sp4y]

Speaking of Google, Google Kent's "doctoral dissertation" from his time at Patriot Bible University if you want a laugh

[@DarranKern]

“Hello, my name is Kent Hovind...”

[@lmoral222]

@@DarranKern What's funny is I can imagine his loyal followers responding to that like, "what's wrong with that, don't you introduce yourself when you meet new people?" 🤦

[@San_Vito]

@@lmoral222 I've neved stopped to think about that. Thanks for ruining my evening.

[@lmoral222]

@@San_Vito I am sorry

[@12345.......]

I have never written a doctoral dissertation, but every paper written in university was always third person. Anyone else have likewise experience?

[@tekkaman65535]

You gotta give Kent some credit though: when he's not body slamming his wife, he's shopping for some really sick Hawaiian shirts.

[@parsival]

His thing about the fossils "it only shows that something died" is unexplainably ridiculous. It's like, if I went to the beach and took a photo from the car park where you can see the beach in the background, and then he turns around and say "ah but you never went to the beach, you were just in the car park". Sure from just the one photo you could say that, but if you look at every photo I took that day, you could clearly see I started in the car park at midday, and went to and around the beach, leaving in the evening. How does he not realise that taking one thing, out of context is not going to give you all the answers, you need to look at everything to see the whole picture. It'll be like trying to solve a jigsaw puzzle using only one piece.

[@EdwardHowton]

He realizes plenty. He's just a lying piece of shit. He does not like the truth and is not like the truth. He can NEVER concede any single point, no matter how trivial. He is an abuser and that is what they do. People call it 'gaslighting' now. He loved telling stories about how he used to beat his kid. The sheer joy on his face. He is pathological.

[@justamon2281]

Just started the video but you already know that Kent Hovind is so attention starved that he’ll respond to this no matter what

[@lukelorain5752]

It's amazing how kent was graduated in chemics, biology and paleontology by Google... he is really a phenomenon ... i needed to study at university ... wtf he is really a genius !!!

[@surlybear7907]

Hahaha! That CC joke in the beginning.... I wasn’t prepared for that!

[@MMAGamblingTips]

Dan: “DNA, Kent, you can’t argue with that.“ Kent: “Oh silly Dan, do you not know who the I am?”

[@blahblingo7605]

he was so PROUD that he knew how to say deoxyribonucleic acid. reminds me of me in gradeschool. 🤣

[@marxistopiateaddict]

who the i am??

[@Sleezy.Design]

I love how he still coughs right into his palm, even during a global pandemic

[@vestafreyja]

@Brian Waller Actually he does!

[@Loganbeecham]

Kint hoven is evolving just backwards

[@davidlazarus67]

That’s senility.

[@riccardopucci2764]

So was Jesus riding a T-Rex?... “I’m not prepared for that” 🤣

[@shanewilson7994]

Nope, that was Harry Dresden riding it in Chicago.

[@meangreen247]

I love when people are so early. That they can't count

[@matijabublic]

I was so early that my number went to negative 8D

[@SwiftCreationStudio]

Hey hey, it's called premature ejac-- oh you meant... okay.

[@Grimlock13is13king]

I'm late and still cannot count......Wait, this is something I should not be proud of is it?

[@TotalRookie_LV]

"..it shows, that something died..." Yeah, and that's Kent's credibility, which happened a long time ago, not exactly as long as to make it a -coprolith- fossil, but long enough.

[@alexanderthompson9070]

"No they don't!" That's the argument my child uses ... So this wacko has the same argument powers as a child

[@San_Vito]

Only when he's having a lucid moment.

[@fjccommish]

It's the argument you folks use for evilutionism.

[@irrelevant_noob]

@@fjccommish as opposed to your poisoning the well by deliberately mispelling terms for emotional effects... which isn't even an argument at all. :p And if you really think there's just one argument for evolution (and that it's so lightweight), you've spent NO time looking into the information about it. At all.

[@yourivandermeer3171]

3:55 "Our chickens have a lot of eggs, when we let them hatch guess what they turn out to be?" "Breakfast?" "Chickens" Just different words, same meaning.

[@dentheman1797]

Every single time Kent says “well, it doesn’t” I expected a jodelvideo with proof to pop up. But I mean: EVERY single time. How cool would that be? How long would this clip be?

[@kholdanstaalstorm6881]

Could it be? Could we get a more than 1 hour long debunk of this so-called truth-speaker and religious scientist Kent Hovind? That would be a truly glorious day!

[@gerardbryant4840]

It would become a mini-series.

[@jollybodger]

If we yodelled every incorrect "fact" of Kents, this video would be at least 100 hours long and even though I love the yodelling, that is too much even for me.

[@San_Vito]

I think if that happened we'd get tired of the yodeling pretty damn fast.

[@jansennhenn579]

"Dogs werde dogs", well how he will explain the breeding of different kinds of dogs in the last centuries?

[@Revanbzn]

That they are still that elusive dog “kind” and they are still dogs

[@joshk3273]

"God did it!" ;D

[@veronikamajerova4564]

Better yet, different kinds can´t breed, right? You can´t breed cat and dog, for example. So, why can you breed for example wolf and coyote, or wolf and dog, or coyote and dog, and get healthy offsprings, who can breed further (unlike for example mules, who are infertile).

[@AngelEmfrbl]

He doesn't understand nor want to understand how evolution works. Once you have a bloodline, evolution is committed to that direction. It can divert and become something else. It can only produce more of what it is. What it can do is produce lots and lots of new versions of that creature. If you go backwards from cats and dogs, you eventually find their common ancestor that they shared. At one stage there was no difference. However, once a split happened, one line was committed to cats, the other to dogs. And eventually they became unable to have kids with each other. We cannot predict the future we can only draw lines in the past. You can only ever be the sum of your ancestors. This is how we ended up with our heads on backwards... In the past invertebrates has a common ancestor whose head was 90 degrees at an angle. To compensate, the body twisted over time 90 degrees in the other direction. So we all now have a head on backwards. 😅

[@Punderman11]

I always get annoyed when Kent and his ilk say "kind" What the hell is a "kind" how do you define what a "kind" is? According to the bible everything that swims in the ocean is of the "Fish kind" but Dolphins are mammals.. Often they will respond with "All dogs look like dogs and are of the Dog kind (or the same with cats) so the checkmate here is to ask them to which "kind" does the Hyena belong? Because if we go based on how they look (similar to dogs) then they belong in the dog kind.. but Genetically we know they are more closely related to felines.. Good times...

[@purple_kathryn]

Kent is many, many things but a "gent" is not one of them

[@shadednights6870]

He denies anything that shows he's wrong. Look at domesticated dogs looks completely different from a wolf yet that's where they came from.

[@Hoscitt]

'Dogs produce dogs' Pretty sure he would agree that dogs came from wolves 🤔

[@CathrineMacNiel]

Naaaah. They always were dogs, they didn't knew it yet.

[@misterocain]

He needs to show how two wolves can produce a litter of Dascshunds.

[@dogwalker666]

Compare a Wolf to a Boston Terrier, humm

[@misterocain]

@@dogwalker666 Yeah i often use the Boston Terrier. With it's flat face it's more like a cat in that dept. Although it seems obvious, see if you can get a YEC to list the differences between a Boston Terrier and a cat. Not as easy as you think.