Expensive vs. Cheap Martin Acoustic Guitars | 000-X1 vs. 000-42

[@jonwilliam3597]

As a retired 'soundman' (and I prefer that name as opposed to the more grand sounding sound engineer), I have found that sound is very subjective, in concert audio systems and in guitars. I have travelled the world producing live sound for many top artists with a variety of different cheap to expensive instruments. It was my job to make them all sound as pleasing and as good as possible. In this video I actually prefer the brighter sound of the cheaper guitar for my own personal use and it being better to add into a mix with other instruments. Many will prefer the more mellow tones of the more expensive one. Both sound great and it is your personal choice. Do I think the most expensive is worth 10 times more...definitely not. In a live sound mix or studio I could make either sound great, the same or entirely different. I think there may be a playability difference but that would be personal again and of course there is pride in ownership for some with all the fancy inlays etc. of the more expensive guitar which may persuade some. However do not be fooled by the most expensive or the most complex being the best because often it isn't.

[@tossemanden]

Oh for sure you’re right. The more expensive one is much more complex. I would imagine a “flatter” or less complex would suit a modern mix better and be easier to work with. The 42 however: would sound great accompanying a voice or in a simple context where it could really add some depth to the soundstage. Really interesting to hear the differences.

[@regiginang3672]

I think the price is more about wood quality, build and finish quality and of course the endurance.

[@chuckschillingvideos]

That's a very good point. An instrument with less dynamic range (in terms of both volume and frequencies generated) will be easier to set up for both recording and amplification.

[@shaneross7428]

I preferred the crisp and warm sound of the lower end Martin too.

[@G_Demolished]

I always thought the best sounding standard series Martin is the cheapest one. (D18)

[@jamesmargolis1958]

My dad bought a Martin New Yorker for around $200 in 1959 when I was 13 and had proved I loved to play guitar on the Stella it replaced. Loved it even after someone fell on it at Ocean Beach and had to have it completely repaired in 1972. It was stolen from the trunk of my car in 1992. Still Miss it

[@jmelizares9053]

you know the topic is of importance when jesus himself has to explain it on youtube.

[@stevesalt8003]

Lmao

[@NicodemiSoundtrack]

As am I

[@indriyuana1]

Hehe

[@jonjeffries3265]

😇

[@claudiagibsonmusic]

They’re both nice Jewish boys!

[@hidesertmusic]

I picked up a D42 and strummed one chord. I’m sure my jaw dropped when I heard the wonderful tone and resonance I then pu it back on the wall. I couldn’t afford $6995 and I already had a $4200 Taylor. Once you have heard and felt the D42 or 00042 you will be plagued by the desire to own one even if you only play that one chord after you have it. Thanks Cooper.

[@jelau4851]

The trick in guitar store, is walk fast past Martin display, and look the other way.

[@eugenejoseph7076]

That's because you are Guitarded! Just like me.

[@rmyAddison]

I'm a retired musician, life time Martin player. Price is more about woods, craftmanship, appointments rather than the more you spend the better a guitar sounds. My favorite guitar is not my most expensive, a first year OM-18 Authentic. I have others 3-5 times the price, I don't expect them to be 3-5 time better. My lifetime experience is different tone woods for a variety of voices. I have 3 OM's with 6 different woods (OM-18 Authentic Adi/Mahogany, Custom Shop OM-28 Alpine/Madagascar, 2005 OM-45 Engelmann/Tasmanian Blackwood w/alternate torch). 50 years of playing and 37 Martins has shown me personally that different tone woods in different body sizes gives a wonderful variety. Don't get hung up on just rosewood, or just mahogany, try tweener woods like Koa/Tasmanian Blackwood. FWIW my high enders were not closet queens, they went on gigs, carefully monitored, and I never had a problem, "play your best to sound your best".......

[@lowellcalavera6045]

😃 Wow! A Man of The People. That OM-18 was $3,000 new..... 🤔

[@rmyAddison]

@@lowellcalavera6045 Good luck with your musical journey.

[@StevenBornfeld]

@@rmyAddison Nice demonstration of restraint there! ;-)

[@texhaines9957]

Yes, play your best, sound your best. I agree. Ever try Ziricote with Adi? love it.

[@StevenBornfeld]

@@texhaines9957 Adi=Adirondack spruce? I've actually never even heard of zircote. And I see Martin is using it--live and learn!

[@BirdYoumans]

The 42 had a more full bodied sound for lack of a better way to describe it. the x1 had a certain constraint to it. But each sounds good in it's own way. I would probably eq each one to it's own voice so to speak, but I assume you recorded them both with the same setting. Only way to get a fair comparison of how each sounds unadorned so to speak.

[@williamcatalano1762]

All of these videos you guys have been putting out the last 6 to 8 months have been awesome.Keep it up!

[@RogerThat902]

Agreed.

[@sergi23]

Agreed!

[@BaktaBak3]

@@sergi23 ditto

[@glorioskiola]

Agree, yes!

[@hmessec7682]

Martin guitars, to me, have always sounded well balanced with crisp, clear overtones. But, from the first chord on the expensive Martin I heard the mid tones project with a brilliance that I could not believe. Without hearing it live I still believe it may be one of the most beautiful sounding guitars I have ever heard. The less expensive Martin sounded muted an dull by comparison although still with a good Martin sound.

[@유도마-v2r]

I actually had purchased one of those less expensive one on line, but I sold it right away because it sounded cheap. I bought 000-15 Streetmaster instead, and I was finally satisfied.

[@davewinkerson8221]

Martin made a huge mistake when they start building knock-off versions of their own product.

[@spiritualawakenings6251]

Lol

[@landosazo7506]

AFTER A FEW GLASSES OF WINE EVERYTHING SOUNDS GREAT REGARDLESS OF PRICE

[@AurioDK]

My better half doesn´t, she sounds weird and complains a lot. I am a hugger when I get a few glasses and she hates it, she doesn´t drink much.

[@bigbrother458]

NO

[@chrish1695]

Wrong

[@brucemarrs2596]

The more you drink the better I sound.

[@warrenrutherford1713]

@@brucemarrs2596 ...and the better she looks.

[@boudicca7181]

Love your comparison. Both guitars sound beautiful.

[@Cowelly84]

I bought a £130 guitar when I first started, I handed it to my guitar tutor and it sounded amazing. I believe, a £500 guitar can sound like a £5000 in the right hands.

[@StevenBornfeld]

Yes--so much is the player. James Taylor (for example) is recognizable as James Taylor on a Martin or an Olson.

[@acedia4453]

Ive been doing this a while and no, not even close. A trained guitarist will definitely make any guitar sound great but a high end guitar is a completely different instrument to a 130 guitar. That being said, you shouldn't be learning on a high end guitar. Think of the expensive stuff as something you must earn through mastering guitar with the lower cost pieces.

[@robertowen1956]

@@StevenBornfeld Jimmy Olson? Super, man!

[@TheNcmore]

@@acedia4453 Having the good fortune to start out on a Martin D-18 didn't hurt me one bit. I hadn't played guitar in 30 years when I bought my D-18, but way back then my guitar was a cheap entry-level acoustic and I never progressed beyond strumming a few cowboy chords which I'd long forgotten, so I was effectively restarting guitar from ground zero with the D-18. The biggest advantage of having a guitar of the acoustic quality of the D18 (properly set up) from the get-go is how richly it facilitates and rewards advancing skill - the instrument is never an obstacle to improvement. I like that the D18 has a bling-free understated appearance; you are paying for the quality of materials and workmanship that contribute to the D18's sonic qualities, e.g. nitrocellulose finish. A KEY sonic difference to my ear between the sound of most of Martin's less-expensive lines (made in their Mexican facility) and their flagship lines made in Pa - is that the lower-end Martins have that over-bright sound that's nearly indistinguishable from the tinny (to my ear) characteristic tone of Taylors (I have a Taylor 110e as my backup acoustic) - and the warm resonance of the D18s and up. The D18 is simply far more fun to play than the Taylor 110e.

[@Soccernz007]

Nope!!!

[@RickLegg]

I have been playing for 49 years, and it took a long time before I got to own high-end Martin Guitars. Both of the guitars you demo here sound good, but the 000-42 definitely has a warmer sound to it - a depth that is not reached with the 000-X1. The low end projects out more and is more in balance with the higher notes. And the sustain is fuller for a longer time. I have a Martin J12-40, a D12-35 with Brazilian Rosewood back and sides, a D-41, and a D12-41 with Adirondack top. All of them are top of the line for Martin. But I would not take one of them camping. The 000-X1 would be great for camping and still get a great sound while playing around an evening fire.

[@michaelmendillo7513]

Definitely a difference,,,,

[@set3777]

@@michaelmendillo7513 "Definitely a difference,,,," - BUT perhaps those two guitars compared may have different quality and gauge strings installed from their different factories. I put more expensive (12-54) strings on my very cheap guitar that came with 10-48 cheap strings and there is also "Definitely a difference,,,," too especially the bass and sustain. Then I change my pick to thinner ones and I get nice high frequency out of the thinker strings too. Online comparison may be misleading?

[@gabrielmojay7720]

I agree with your analysis absolutely.

[@spiritualawakenings6251]

Lol. You read too many forums.

[@edsautter51]

Good comparison video. Way to tell it like it is. I worked for Martin back in the 80's at "Woodworkers Dream". It was in the old plant on north street. Dick Boak was my boss at the time. I assisted customers and Martin repair centers in ordering parts for repair and spec's for all the Martins. I say all that to say this, the triangle on the back of the headstock is their for looks and to mimic the old Stauffer guitar that Martin made when they first started. You see the wood they could purchase was much to thin to make a "one piece neck" so they pieced together the neck from three pieces. The headstock triangle was a dovetail joint of sorts. It allowed the neck to be attacked to the headstock. Since the guitar was strung with gut strings there wasn't the strong pull on the headstock to cause issue. Many of Martin guitars still carry that triangle like the D28 but the D35 does not. So yes it adds strength to the area but it's more for cosmetics than anything. Side note when I worked at Martin a employee D28 guitar was 600 dollars. That's how they have grown in value. Wish I took them up on the offer and bought a few back then. I'd be the richer man for having done so. I would say what a great company to work for. They treat everyone like family still to this day. It was a time in my life I'll never forget.

[@StevenBornfeld]

I had no idea Martin was copying Stauffer. Thinking about some day looking around for a nice Stauffer copy. Good to hear that Martin is a good boss. Was a little sad (but not surprised) when they moved some of their production out of the country.

[@edsautter51]

Staffer was what Fredrick Martin guitars were named in 1833. To copy a guitar they made was only to pass on something they thought was signature of their name. The "volute" as it was called must have been that signature.

[@StevenBornfeld]

@@edsautter51 What, on the headstock?

[@edsautter51]

@@StevenBornfeld the volute is as they call it the diamond on the back of the headstock.

[@StevenBornfeld]

@@edsautter51 Thanks!

[@im-un-fragile]

I didn't know Ashton Kutcher knew so much about guitars! Seriously though, nice comparison video. I love when someone does this and plays the same chord/lead riffs for each instrument in comparison. Unfortunately a $6k guitar will never be in my budget. Thank you for this video.

[@genesultry6447]

Your noodling is much different than my noodling lol... Great demo, young man! I look forward to seeing more in the future.

[@gildavis8266]

Yes, I agree there's a difference in the tonal quality of each guitar. The more expensive one has a lighter overall precise sound while the less expensive one has a deeper flat sound that more, or less resonates along with each chord as you play it. To me it's like the difference between mono and stereo. Both are excellent instruments.

[@glennjustice2760]

Great demo man. I’m amazed at these Mexico made guitars. I have some nice standard Martin’s. I love them. But I find myself often picking my south of the border Martin. It’s a great time for owning great sounding guitars. The technology that goes into them is the reason they sound so good. Thanks for the great demo. It’s great that in these hard times most anyone can own a Martin.

[@judsonh1949]

The gain is actual, but it is not a straight line. The sonic benefit gets incrementally less as the price goes up. At a certain point, you begin paying for things other that sound and more for perceived value of exotic woods and bling.

[@Soccernz007]

and the fact it will hold or go up in value and........... snob value...which of course you can never put a price on!!! :)

[@JustinSmith-hr6qg]

Is there a sweet spot model in regards to Martins?

[@timlarson9033]

@@JustinSmith-hr6qg Sure. Order a quality Martin without the bling for half the asking price of the piece of art above. I have an HD-28 and I play it all the time. I use it for my job. A straight up HD-28 costs $3,199.00 retail. You can possibly get a better deal from a music store. I got mine for $2500. Still a lot of bread. But it's a lot less expensive than a custom version HD-28 with all the trimmings at $4,499.00. In my opinion, it's worth it to play a quality instrument. They are also easier to play IMHO.

[@JustinSmith-hr6qg]

@@timlarson9033 Thanks for the response!

[@dxcman1]

I owned one of the x series for a bit. Fantastic guitars.. I sold it to a friend that wanted a good acoustic and it allowed me to upgrade. If you only have 600 to spend versus 6k then it is a no brainer. A wonderful guitar for the price.

[@DonaldMerrit]

I have a Martin DXc1e. Had it for about ten years now. I believe it was Martin's first low budget offering. It is the first and only Martin that I have ever owned and when I first picked it up to play it I instantly recognized that Martin sound. The neck is made out of a resin composite that kind of resembles Heartwood. At first i hated the fact that it was not wood, But! It turns out that the neck is incredibly stable. It is un affected by temp and climate. Awesome!

[@ignaciofelipe2826]

Clearly the expensive one has a brighter sound and has a bit more “echo” on the sounds and the “cheap” one sounds deeper and personally I prefer deeper sounds over the brighter sounds tho the echo on the other one sounds cool but I stick to the 000X1 plus no gloss is 🔥

[@graynotescartridgebox]

I think the gloss finish really diminishes the sound of raw spruce.

[@el34glo59]

The expensive 42 will open up and dry out and be a monster

[@jonmedley3160]

In a quick an easy way to narrow it down. The 000-42 has a fuller Warner sound with more frequencies in the bass. The 000-X1 has less bass. Both guitars high end sounded exactly the same. Both guitars sounds extremely amazing.

[@steveb9325]

For a working musician it comes down to this "for me". I have both. For gigs (when we could actually play clubs w "people") played the way less expensive one. For home and studio played the nice one. You don't want a 5 or 6 K guitar at a beer joint and they play and sound just great. Np. Plus, the biggest thing for me is I can relax on breaks not worrying about a 6K guitar as I go to bathroom or outside for some musicians cologne.....

[@emmanuelserrato7805]

Whats musicians cologne haha ive never heard that before

[@steveb9325]

@@emmanuelserrato7805 legal in several states now aka mary jane

[@celsodelacruz4060]

@@steveb9325 I figured haha

[@ScottRandall31]

That's my take, too.

[@herbythechef7624]

Now when youre talking cheap are you talking under a grand? I would take my 2k gibson so a gig instead of settling for a low end for performance. I want my nice guitars to be heard not just played at home

[@donalddecker1640]

I've been player guitars since 1957, with a Sears Silvertone F-hole with bridge adjuster, a Martin folk in 1960, an electric Guild Starfire 1967, a Ymaha FG-50 classical, a F-800 acoustic (2021)...my verdict on this: The least expensive guitar beats the expensive guitar handsdown.

[@dougalmuir]

I have a trip 0 28. Absolutely agree that the 000 28 is perfect. I also don't need the 42 for the abolone shell either. my trip 28 is so beautiful nd has the most beautiful sound. The Indian Rosewood sides and back give it all of the warmth it needs. Great video series man!

[@flycubfly]

The Martin Guitar factory is about 4-5 miles from me . Worth the time to do the tour .

[@ZaneDalton]

Lucky!

[@FrugalInventor]

6:32 vs 7:59 6:59 vs 8:30 7:26 vs 8:57

[@xo.vxnessa]

appreciate it:))

[@ryandriver3341]

Thank you !

[@toddleclaire5700]

I own a 000X1, I am very happy and pleased with the sound

[@elijahkeen8305]

Both sound great but honestly the more expensive one sounds so much better the highs really ring out brighter and the tone all together

[@유도마-v2r]

It does't sound 10 times better ; it sounds a thousand times better.

[@fhare666]

I have an '80s X1, it sounds absolutely fantastic. It smells, looks, feels, and plays like it's big brothers.

[@cindysouthern]

Same! Love my 80's X1!

[@tradeka4206]

I have one of the x series guitars and I love it. It might not be quite as nice as the high end Martins but at around $500 I don’t think you can get a better acoustic for the price. It blows everything else in that price range out of the water

[@jonadams9410]

I have always liked the sound they put out. Great guitars for the price!

[@cheffy101]

I have a dx1 and i agree, they sound great. I am looking to upgrade to an all wood but i am satisfied with what i have for now.

[@ronj9448]

I have an X and it is pretty good. Don't count out Seagull guitars at 500-600

[@timrussell1559]

I'd be so paranoid about every little nick and scratch on the ultra high end instrument that it would completely take the enjoyment out of playing guitar. Isn't that the whole reason we pick them up to begin with?

[@rmyAddison]

The day I got my OM-45TB ($14K MSRP in 2005) I was the opening act at a Dallas Songwriters event and asked to do the sound check. The sound tech accidentally hit my guitar (small ding) setting up microphones. He was really upset and knew it was a brand new very expensive Martin, and started apologizing. I said it was an accident, the world wouldn't end, and we ended up having drinks after the show. Guitars, IMHO, cheap or very expensive are meant to be played. At least with my player friends, we had no "closet/case queens", we played our best to sound our best, but to each their own.............

[@user-ib8ky6eo4f]

@@rmyAddison this begs the question, what is the point of such expensive instruments in the first place? Never handled one so I don't know if it feels all that better but the sound isn't worth the price

[@vindieseldouble]

@@user-ib8ky6eo4f The hell it isn't.

[@paulcollingridge8387]

Originally felt that about my Lowden (Irish) but 35 years later it is beat to hell and still sounds beautiful (very Irish compared with Martin's classic Americana)

[@forrestw62]

I have an OM 28, love it to death, I play daily and acoustic is my go-to. I do take a better care of it than say my Stratocaster, but guitars are meant to be played. I don't sweat it in a manner that keeps me from enjoying using it, and I don't worry too much if I can't help sweating when I'm playing it. I love how an acoustic instrument moves with humidity changes. My electric axes also feel entirely alive, the Martin is a whole different category.

[@russellharris5072]

Martin have been around such a long time that they have perfected a regime of design,tonewood selection and construction that works well no matter the price point. I may sound like an advert which I'm not,but currently owning four at different price points I am an advocate.By virtue of the above,Martin can produce a consistent sound through all of their instruments which has become known as the "Martin sound."All guitars have a different voice depending on size and wood selection,Martin have the skills to minimize that difference..................

[@rrrrkoop2776]

I own 2 martins, which i could play as good as the quality they have. lol. D76 and a D28 150th anniversary

[@StevenBornfeld]

I do find that they are more consistent than (for example) Gibson flat tops

[@gggrindingguitaristgg3474]

A Martin GPC-X2E owner here. I love it and enjoy playing it day in day out :) And even though it has HPL back and sides, I still noticed it sounded better after months of playing, probably its solid top has opened up. Its resonance is beautiful. Would love to have an all-solid Martin one day, maybe an all-solid mahogany, but I am happy with my GPC-X2E.

[@johnwbanjo]

The difference was there but not as noticeable as I anticipated. I’m a 000 fan and I love the 42, but there’s no reason to be disappointed with the X.

[@erikkibler3466]

I bought a guitar because of you guys and I couldn’t be happier with it.excellent job fellas.thank you

[@cedartop1]

Wow, I was surprised that even on my phone I could hear the difference. looking forward to trying it out on a sound system.

[@lilyguitarea1762]

The 000-42 sounded warmer and more resonant to me. I kind of felt like you played better on 000-X1 though, maybe because you were more warmed up. They both sound great anyway! Thanks for the cool demo 👍

[@carlvensia5136]

Your cheap guitar is more expensive than my most expensive guitar.

[@michaelcameron2292]

Ha ha Agree the cheap one ain't that cheap

[@herbythechef7624]

I hope that you all one day get to own a guitar more expensive than $1500 because they are so much better above that price.

[@michaelcameron2292]

@@herbythechef7624 wish you hadnt said that I just tell myself the difference is purely cosmetic but theres always 2nd hand market some great deals out there if your careful

[@herbythechef7624]

@@michaelcameron2292 true but if you ask my opinion the cosmetic difference really only starts at over 3 grand. Guitars between 1500-3000 are just better quality instruments than guitars that are less than that. If you see pretty guitars above 3 grand then you are paying for looks. If you are serious about guitar playing just save your money and make sure you buy something thats all wood. Not laminate with a fake wood fretboard like the X series martins

[@trevorwilliams632]

Difficult to get an opinion on sound on a smartphone as the speakers aren't good enough. But as a general rule the 6,000 dollar model will probably sustain better and sound will be about 20% better. The 600 dollar model will be better value dollar for dollar but the more expensive model will always sound better. The best way to get a good guitar cheaply is to buy a second hand one which is already played in or get one from a Taylor road show where Taylor will put their best sounding models on show and you get the benefit of getting a model that is played in as well. You can get a 6,000 dollar model for a lot less that way.

[@dougmackenzie5976]

Every guitar is worth exactly what you would pay for it. Been playing 50 years. I have old Martins, old Stellas, old Nationals, and a few cheap newer models. Pricier guitars will sound better for many reasons, but, sometimes, a cheap guitar can be very surprising. In the end, it is simply what one prefers.

[@patious7779]

I've spent alot of time trying to decipher the difference between high vs low dollar guitars. His playing is incredible on either guitar. But the 000-42 is far superior in tone, sustain, and resonance. If you have the resourses the decision is easy.

[@russsimmons9960]

I normally prefer the sound of the high-end Martins, but in this case I actually prefer the cheaper one. It just sounds better to me. And now I'm really perplexed.

[@lukekelly4360]

My opinion just go for a high end Sigma. It'll look the part and it'll probably cost less than the bare bones Martin

[@gregoryschleitwiler9601]

@@lukekelly4360 Martin will last forever and sound better over time. PERIOD

[@lukekelly4360]

@@gregoryschleitwiler9601 Anything can last forever as long as you look after it.

[@gregoryschleitwiler9601]

@@lukekelly4360 my 00018 is 50 years old and looks like Willie Nelson's as far as being beat up. Aesthetics has nothing to do with the sound.

[@lukekelly4360]

@@gregoryschleitwiler9601 The older guitars I agree fair enough but the way guitars are made and mass produced today all you are paying for is the name, especially with these budget Martins. I have a faith Venus acoustic guitar that I bought for 400 bucks 2 years ago. I’ve played Martins, Taylors and Gibsons. Sound wise my guitar competes with the big brand’s that are 10 times the price.

[@annavonstraussenburg7946]

I definitely hear a richer tone with the more expensive guitar. I grew up playing my mom’s older 1940’s Martin. I just bought a 000-28 (Eric Clapton edition). I haven’t played in quite a few years and I felt like I needed a really good instrument to inspire me.

[@brucemarrs2596]

I was hoping to say "no difference," but really, the 000-42 sounded like heaven. Thank you.

[@phillmaf7319]

The low priced one was more lively whereas the expensive one had more audio depth and restraint ,but was a sleeping tiger sonically. Thanks for your hard work.

[@tomdaoust]

Very fair comparison. Thanks for including a full description of the builds for each guitar. One thing you didn’t mention is cost of ownership. I just bought a 2019 Martin D-18 used for about $2500. I will enjoy it for years and when I-or my family-sell it 10 or 15 years from now I could probably get all of my money back (I admit, in inflated dollars). But I would have enjoyed a very fine guitar for 10 years. So if I can readily pay $2500 I should enjoy the higher priced guitar. It’s just a better way to enjoy life and play an upscale instrument. It’s a personal choice. My cost of ownership is very small. I should mention I am almost 72 yrs old. I won’t be owning my Martin guitar for 55 yrs, as I have owned my 1969 Mosrite combo electric. I am the first and only owner, and the Mosrite is worth about $3k to $4k today. I paid $325 in 1969.

[@wesmalkin916]

I listened to it without looking (phone was in my back pocket) and I didn’t hear the announcement of which guitar. Had on decent bt earbuds and I could definitely hear the 000-42. Over all EVEN without highend cans I could hear the difference in the harmonic structure. Everything rang with a different clarity. The HPL isn’t a bad guitar but it’s not close to the 42. That said having a guitar that plays well will make all the difference in the world to beginners and intermediate players... the lower end martins are head and shoulders above most other inexpensive guitars.

[@vishalreddy1515]

The 42 is possibly the most beautiful tone I've heard to. The tonal difference is noticeable in comparison, the resonance and the tension felt absolutely dream like. Hands down 42.

[@PainkillerDCXVI]

When the guitars are all solid it's completely subjective imo, soundwise not the build quality... I really enjoy all mahogany guitars as an example because I pretty much only play fingerstyle and the bass notes are always there they never get lost while playing they almost feel like the focus when I play I love that.

[@gibby6904]

There is beauty in the simplicity of the the 000x1 as well.....sounds beautiful too! IM in the middle I like my 000-18. ....solid wood.....no bling....just does its job very well......although I could be quite happy with the 000x1

[@ZJMusic1990]

They both sound great!

[@martinpollack5806]

Thanks for the fantastic comparison, and your very astute, and honest remarks about the 10x price difference. I can't agree more. Yes, the expensive one has better resonance, and projection, and has an overall superior sound. But, what can you expect of a laminate bodied guitar, compared to solid Sitka Spruce on top of solid Rosewood? That "cheap" laminate guitar still has the quality of a Martin. It does not have the projection or clarity of the 10x one, but it still sounds very good to me. It has a warm sound, and it seems to project and resonate better than any such a guitar that I have heard in quite a while, if ever. You have made a very good point, and are a darn good player too. Great job.

[@tmanwattsutube]

Great comparison! I much preferred the pricey model sound, but they BOTH sound great. Excellent intonation up and down the fretboard for both. My ears heard distinctively more sustain in the 4 figure guitar, as well as something I don’t have a word for but know it when I hear it: “ringy-ness”. Meaning, I could hear more detail in each string and note, very much like the difference in sound you get when you FIRST string a guitar and the strings have that amazing tonal quality for a few days. The “Inexpensive” guitar sounded great and I’d be more than happy to gig with it. It sounded a bit more dry and muffled in comparison to the other. An intangible that only YOU can answer: it appeared to me you were working harder to play the lower end model to get the same results, maybe pressing harder, concentrating harder…. I don’t know. It’s just something I noticed. I can see how a sound guy would prefer it though. The more dry sound is much less likely to feedback and the crispness of the notes during the solo portion of the demo I think edged out the expensive big brother. But the open chords, hands down to our $5k friend!

[@clarenceshim4339]

cooper you are the Man, you gave the best assessment of guitar price points Ever, I have always wanted a Martin, but the cheapest American made one was like $2000 or more, that lower price Martin made in mexico sounded really good, and you say that the new model has a pickup in it that's great Man, SHIMI from Rochester NY

[@DaltonPhantom]

I love a soft V too, Coop! 😇

[@mrfrazz]

What was cool, is that I dropped the remote between the cushions of my couch and low and behold, I found $6000 dollars in there. So I went and bought that 000-42. Are you kidding me? Who has that kind of money? I would love that guitar, but I don't think I'll ever have that kind of money to spare. Martin is the best ever made, but I will have to stick to the working man's version. I'll take it. Thanks for the review, amigo. You are very articulate and knowledgeable, even if you are a bit out of touch with working people's budgets. Thanks!

[@752brickie]

I like the X series sound for the price difference !

[@philippelastours7860]

The cheap one sounds beautifull in your hands Cooper!! Wich proves as always that the player makes the difference in the first place , then the guiars . IMHO. Thank you for your demos .

[@banjo1434]

I'd pay to have that abalone shell taken off. Never understood why they decided it brought anything to the instrument. The beauty of the acoustic guitar is in the wood and the craftsmanship.

[@wilsonfu9304]

Agree

[@RogerThat902]

agreed. I don't want something that feels like an heirloom. I love broken in acoustics so much. For me that means obvious wear and tear from someone who played it a lot. You get any kind of mark on that and you'd cry. No thanks.

[@michaelbosch9024]

with you on your abalone take. They can loose that finger print magnate high gloss finish too.

[@glorioskiola]

I agree. I really don’t like all those embellishments on the high end one.

[@michaelcameron2292]

Spot on makes no difference to the sound Excuse to hike the price

[@davidcarroll8735]

Congratulations on both the 100k subscribers and the 700k views on this one! Great review, headphones make the difference

[@kofiofosu9051]

Martin really knows how to make their higher end guitars sound considerably nicer, fuller, basically grand.

[@devinmichaelroberts9954]

haha not true... there is really no way to say that the higher end will sound better. In this video the cheaper guitar is far better sounding

[@brohemian]

@@devinmichaelroberts9954 youre deaf or need to level up your listening abilities

[@devinmichaelroberts9954]

@@brohemian oh jesus your fucking name "broheim" says it all.

[@gosman949]

@@brohemian I agree. He must have cotton in his ears.

[@유도마-v2r]

@@brohemian It usually is uncureable.

[@kieranmahony5919]

Hey, 2024 here, I bought a Recording King RO standard, got it set up professionally, and it is a killer, a Martin Killer.

[@Whirlwind-tf4mh]

The lower priced guitar has a cleaner sound to my elderly ears; it truly does!

[@hudsoncaceres6820]

As a previous owner of the 000-X1, it is the absolute best bang-for-your-buck guitar on the market. The tone, playability, and visual character of the guitar are spectacular for a guitar of that price point (about $600, and I recommend it to anyone looking for a guitar in any budget below $1500.

[@colinclement2752]

I personally find the Martin x-series guitars absolutely horrible. But to each their own.

[@rickchaffey9521]

Loved the review and obviously the 42 is a better richer sounding guitar, but the x1 is a fantastic guitar for that price. I love the sound the x1 produces and the materials used for the neck and body are extremely durable especially if you play a lot of jams where I would feel uncomfortable bringing a $6k guitar. I think you are getting more for your money with the X1.

[@davewinkerson8221]

The 42 is the kind of guitar that stays at home, and the X1 you can take camping.

[@csilt]

Great playing and good choice of mic and room etc because this is much better sounding than a lot of KZbin videos.

[@kevininman2013]

The 42 sound deeper and brighter in sound. That being said they are both nice sounding!

[@acemereel3117]

You are great with breaking things down . Very thorough and Honest . Undoubtedly the “All wood” has a warmer tone , but the alternative has the stratabond neck and I prefer those over any other neck for Martin .

[@DD-eight]

The 42 sounds great but for the price wow tht X series sounds good!!

[@RogerThat902]

I thought so too. Would be a great guitar to have around the house laying around. I bet it can take a lot of punishment too.

[@majingazetto5147]

Agreed. I always thought, that Martin is putting out some awesome budget guitars in their X series. I think, at that price point it’s hard to find a better sounding/playing guitar.

[@peterbryan3081]

Well, what an interesting comparison! I have 4 Martins, including a DJR10, a 1965 0018, and a 1948 0018. I just recently picked up a used 2005 000X1 (which was American, not Mexican made). I got this guitar off Marketplace at an absolute steal of a deal, and am completely blown away by it. I had to do some work on the truss rod (to flatten the finger board) and to both the nut and saddle (which I replaced) to get the action where I wanted it. The tone is really good and it is very comfortable to play. It will be my "camping guitar", as I think the HPL will stand up better to heat and humidity changes. What a great guitar this has turned out to be!

[@ShadyOne9]

As a registered poor man, this decision will never haunt me…..

[@billbertagnoli4226]

The previous comment by Jon Williams is so right on. If you have five grand and Desire a "Art" level instrument Go for it. If you are of more Modest means rest assured That Martin and other guitar Makers have you covered. Try a basic guitar with the Basic fishman pickup through A loudbox. It will make you Smile 😊

[@RamDanesseMusic]

You definitely played the lead guitar licks better on the X Series! Or it could be that I’m biased because I just bought a Martin 000 X Series Special Acoustic-Electric. Lol. Great demo!

[@timmack2415]

I can tell you that I absolutely love my Mexican Martin DX-1 for bringing out to parties or campfires. After a good setup, it's a wonderful players guitar.

[@BentRim]

I was fortunate to find a US made Dx1 years ago. It's one of my favorites. Plays nice, sounds good to me.

[@Jrj777-v5p]

Totally agree. Love mine too and dont have to worry about losing 3500 if it gets damages or stollen.

[@bornwild3955]

I bought a $20 bucks Mexican guitar and $10 bucks d’adario classic nylon strings and I enjoyed playing it and taking it to parties or to the beach or friends houses and letting other people to play it was a lot of fun..Then a bought a $500 bucks Ibanez electro acoustic and I was worried about her all the time. Not fun. Pick the right guitar for the right moment.

[@anthonyb2334]

A great video. Over the past six years I have tried and purchased nearly 80 acoustic guitars (still own 12). I presently own four Martins but have owned the 0001X AND a 00018 side by side.You can feel and hear the difference in the guitars. If I could afford the $6000 guitar I would definitely buy it. But the lower line Martins still retain a specific sound that tells you “yeah, it’s a Martin”. For me, the perfect mix is in the middle ground somewhere but having said that, I love my 00015m as one of my three favorites. Thank you

[@jonadams9410]

I prefer the $6,000, but my 64 year old fingers only have about $600 worth of life left in them. The X series sounds great-tho not as great as the TPL0 42.

[@HarryNicNicholas]

i have a OOOX1 it's the best of the 50 or so guitars I've owned, including my 66 j45 and 69 epiphone texan....

[@koolbeans8292]

Harry Nicholas Absolutely Harry!!!! My xxx 1AE is by far the best sounding guitar I have owned. My 64 yo deaf ears have been looking for a long time. 45 years and at least 25 different guitars.

[@tomfocht3292]

I hear you my 67 year fingers would be happy with either one☺️

[@boudicca7181]

still young.

[@funstuff2006]

I've seen people pick up a sub-$600 dollar guitar and get $6000 dollars worth of sound out of it. If you let me play a $6000 dollar guitar it'd probably sound like six bucks 😁.

[@jhustler1992]

I had a 000X1AE model and it was a great guitar. I sold it as I had upgraded to the American Martin OOO-17. However, I'm very partial to the American Martin guitars as they are a huge improvement over the Mexican built models. I'am a firm believer in getting what you pay for in most cases. I say the 42 sounds the best. I also love the OM models too.

[@davewinkerson8221]

I would never uy a Mexican Martin. I think they bring the Martin name way down.

[@MrNilOrange]

I have a handmade Lowden that cost me £1500 about 20 years ago. But I mostly play a Japanese guitar that cost £14 about 50 years ago. Music is about feeling. Hard to put a price on.

[@tyshred9251]

Le facts.

[@pmvoice88]

The pricey one had better clarity but I kinda liked the cheapo because it was deeper and fuller to my ears. A blind test would have been interesting.

[@pads-zr9ln]

I had no idea the price, the start of the expensive one sounded harsh to my ear, I'm trying out an x2 when I can find one

[@micktepolt6276]

love your playing, and that OOO-42 she would be proud to have you play her, you all have a Happy New Years from Oregon Coast

[@monkeysweeperguitar]

Just a side note: The volute, on the headstock of a Martin, is a nod to their past. The headstock and neck used to be two pieces joined together, and the volute was the joint. When they switched over to a one-piece neck, they left the volute there for aesthetic purposes.

[@el34glo59]

Bingo

[@danielallen7384]

I had a Martin DX-1 I bought several years ago and got in a tight and had to sell it. Well it caused me to stop playing guitar period. I didn't want to play anything else. Well, in what I could afford. Those cheaper Martin's are fantastic and sound so beautiful. Most definitely worth the price.

[@markkuefner2535]

You could make rubberbands around a shoebox sound good! Keep em coming Thanks

[@scottwallace7949]

After listening to this video a few times I decided to order the x2e, we'll see in 2 days 😀

[@JimsMusicLegacy]

I actual prefer the sound of the cheaper model, especially when you played lead and scales. The notes sounded more distinguishable on the cheaper model, whereas the expensive one started to wash out with the more echoey resonance. I just bought the Martin road series and I love it.

[@norbertlohan5951]

Hi Cooper, many thx for this comparison! As Jon William put it, it‘s a bit difficult to judge from youtube and he as a soundman can make everything make sound good. I was perplexed how good that cheap Martin sounds here. And I was not surprised how good the expensive one sounds. That’s what one could expect. But you‘ve named the main aspect: You can feel the rosewood vibrate when you play the 42. And that generally is the main difference to my experience and you have to touch the guitars to feel it. If you take a cheap guitar it doesn’t vibrate and you feel the absence of wood. If you grab an expensive one it immediately starts to vibrate and to resonate. You don’t even need to play it. And then come all the pros and cons you need, scale length, mud width, neck profile and so on. For me it must not be a 6.000 $ one. As long as it really vibrates maybe 1.000 or 1.500 may be expensive enough. F.e. I love these Sigma models of a little higher price range shortly above 1.000. They are really great copies of the expensive Martin models. What about a comparison of a Martin and a corresponding Sigma? Many thx and cheers! Norbert

[@robertb.bricker1248]

We can debate the tonal quality and feel of guitars all day. One thing that cannot be debated is that this guy has the most glorious locks on the internet. ( and decent player as well!)

[@mylohersh718]

I definitely heard a qualitative difference in the sound. It was a richer, warmer tone which is what people look for in quality Martins. I recently was offered a 1969 D-35 from an acquaintance which I bought after being blown away by how good the tone was. Was in excellent condition. I have other inexpensive guitars and it is grade school T-ball versus the New York Yankees. I enjoy these reviews.

[@family3medevals790]

The switch from the 42 to the X1 was drastic, with the X1 sounding flat in comparison, lacking the overtones and resonance of the 42. On the solo, the 42 nearly had a deep beautiful growl on the low strings. The 42 sound is clearly superior. Yet after the initial shock of the switch from the 42 to the X1, the X1 sounds fantastic the longer you listen to it. In fact, there are times I would prefer the X1 cleaner sound on full open cords rather than the 42’s complex overtones sounding jumbled. I would gladly welcome both Martins in my home!

[@bobaldo2339]

I agree. Complex overtones can become just annoying, especially if you are singing with the guitar.

[@el34glo59]

@@bobaldo2339 Yeah you can deaden that with different strings. Different types and brands

[@MattH-wg7ou]

Man, I love the Martin 42 series! One day I hope to own a D42.

[@skwrttj]

If I were any kind of good guitar player, I might be able to justify the 42... but, being the player I am, I don’t think I could make the 000-42 sound like a $6000 guitar, and I sure can make the $600 guitar sound like a $300 guitar!! 🤪🤪😂

[@onemorething100]

I can't imagine there is a guitar out there that you can't manipulate to sound beautiful. Fabulous playing Sir.

[@Donbstard]

I think people should listen to the difference through high-end headphones, there is a big difference in tone between the two. The more expensive has a richer tonal sound but the cheaper guitar isn't too far behind. They both sound great in the right hands and I would be happy with either. Nice job.

[@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549]

I think you should also listen through cheep headphones to hear which headphones are better

[@carolfeben3077]

I love the higher end guitar sound. I paid £3000 for my Martin 28e about 5 years ago and it has been worth every penny, beautiful to play and beautiful rich mellow sound. I had an Ovation before and I tried all the Martin range until I got up to this price bracket before I would seriously consider buying because nothing else felt or sounded as good. The sweet dulcet tones woo all who hear it and it goes on improving with age. Even other band members comment on the beautiful sound when I play it at church. I’d go for quality every time even if I had to pay by instalments!

[@EliNews]

What I love about Taylor is the fact even a cheap model sounds good enough next to the expensive one so it always become a matter of style and taste than a matter of what sounds better. Whereas with Martin I always feel I would be better off investing in the more expensive models

[@carlitobrigante330]

Without question. I highly doubt those X-series guitars will hold any value over time, while a genuine Martin will almost always appreciate.

[@adrianjones8073]

I just bought a Martin X Series Special and I honestly thought it sounded better than many of the $2,000 - $4,000 guitars that I tried. Every guitar is different and sometimes you can find a cheap guitar that just sounds and feels incredible.

[@maureenjennings1792]

I bought a cheao Martin in the 80s, called a SIGMA, (made in Japan). Its been across the country, got broken in a home remodel & fixed by a plumber & I tell you, it still sounds great. I have a few old Gibsons but this Sigma has such a big sound. A freind wanted to but a Martin & I told him about this. You can still find for a few hundred dollars.

[@unclejohnsfriend]

The difference between the two was rather drastic in my opinion. It fully drove home to me that I do not need or would ever have a use for the expensive guitar because I don't have a need for recording but if I were a professional I would absolutely go for the more expensive guitar but instead I would love the cheaper one so that I could entertain my drunk friends with. Lol

[@davewinkerson8221]

LOL, true. That why marching bands use cheap instruments.

[@randybobandy7236]

A d35, j45/50, d28, d18, 00-21, and a 000-28 is my dream acoustic collection. Martins are so beautiful.

[@ricksmith201]

The 000-42 is my next acoustic guitar.

[@herbythechef7624]

I would like to own one day too. That is like the cadillac of 000 guitars