Head to brilliant.org/TheB1M/ for a 30-day free trial and get 20% off an annual premium subscription 🙌
@adrienparisse82999 ай бұрын
Hi B1M, Please note that at 3:27 you have written 28.5m ^2 foot print which must be typo and should be the length of the side of the square footprint. Or else thats smaller then the average home footprint in even the UK.
9 ай бұрын
You have a mistake in the video - at around 3:25, you state that the building's footprint is 28.5 m², but that would mean that each side of the building is just a little over 5 meters long. That wouldn't fit even a bathroom, obviously. 🙂 According to Wikipedia, floor plates are squares with 28 m sides, that means that the footprint is about 784 m².
9 ай бұрын
@@adrienparisse8299 Damn, you have been faster than me. :)
@efox20019 ай бұрын
👎 Your "background music" isn't in the background. It's distracting and interferes with the people talking.
@gregc24679 ай бұрын
Reminds me of the Rainbow song ' Stargazer '
@ViolentCabbage-ym7ko9 ай бұрын
How about completing the Jeddah tower first before attempting a ridiculous 2 km skyscraper?
@xyzabcd36069 ай бұрын
Two different companies
@KatoombaTourGuide9 ай бұрын
Same country though
@xavilend9 ай бұрын
It's not like it's the same people working on one project at a time lol.
@sgb47989 ай бұрын
@@xavilendsame people funding it though, no?
@AbdikarimMohamed-fh8jo9 ай бұрын
1 is private and 1 is government backed
@_mickmccarthy9 ай бұрын
"The Vertical Line" Looking forward to seeing how this one gets scaled back
@KatoombaTourGuide9 ай бұрын
They wanted to make a ruler to measure the line lol
@n3ff8489 ай бұрын
If they scale it back at the same factor as their "horizontal line", the would end up with a 29 meter tall building. I think they could manage that.
@jonathanj83039 ай бұрын
"The stump"
@_mickmccarthy9 ай бұрын
@@jonathanj8303 👏😂
@owenstockwood50409 ай бұрын
@@n3ff848 I, for one, welcome the world's most overengineered midrise!
@flolupo9 ай бұрын
Just from the discussion itself and the proposed solutions it is pretty clear that this project is not an answer to any need (like, putting more office space into a crammed location), but rather just the simple desire to build a building of 2km, just "because".
@TheJojo019029 ай бұрын
Agreed … a vanity project.
@highcap49529 ай бұрын
Skyscrapers above 500 m are never an answer to any need. They are just for Publicity. Especially in the desert, where you have more than enough space!
@kik1kik9 ай бұрын
Hey now, don't underestimate the need of "we're insecure and need the biggest phallus shaped construction the world has ever seen" ;)
@imaverageatgamesbutimostly34319 ай бұрын
Is that bad thing? To build a monumental building just for the sake of building it?
@144digital9 ай бұрын
"Because" "That works"
@alexolife9 ай бұрын
"If there's one thing we've learned, it's that middle eastern oil states would rather fail at 1,000,000 oversized vanity projects than succeed at 1 piece of useful infrastructure or build a real economy."
@personmuc943Ай бұрын
Same thing you guys said about Burj Khalifa. Now look at the benefits it brought to the UAE. You banana republics keep talking while the oil states keep working.
@vasvas891426 күн бұрын
@@personmuc943 you're not in position to look down on other nations when 90% of your economy depends on taking stuff that lays under your feet. You would be irrelevant camel-riders without natural gifts the land gives you.
@dmaar88568 күн бұрын
You don’t know anything so please read learn then comment if you want to say a negative comment you need to prove your point Burj Khalifa is one of the most successful project fyi
@auglesher41159 ай бұрын
You know your project is screwed when people trying to wrap their heads around have to say “well if we disregard the laws of physics…..” 😂
@RosinDaddy52809 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂❤
@hellomate6399 ай бұрын
I feel like I'd believe one of these if they had a reinforced concrete pyramid for a base.
@JeffDeWitt9 ай бұрын
It's not that goofy. It's kind of like dreaming what you would do if you won the lottery, then, knowing you won't, you consider you can't do what you were dreaming of, but what CAN you do with those ideas and the resources you actually have.
@MrSeanman308 ай бұрын
Landing on the moon was once thought, "Impossible." Among many other things.
@yourdadow4468 ай бұрын
@@MrSeanman30yeah not like they promised 3 different big projects and we dont see any progress on them
@mathieulandry18149 ай бұрын
The fact that they managed to put an engineer and an architect in the same room without any arguing its also really impressive 😂
@dredeth9 ай бұрын
In reality, in proper professional offices this is how it's done. Leave that dislike between architects and engineers for sweatshop meme offices...
@jimbim44059 ай бұрын
they're both Arup employees. Thats why.....
@XTSu-sl1bb9 ай бұрын
He’s a young engineer with open mind. Not very common to find these
@demoman29 ай бұрын
he's not a structural engineer but in the department "Integrating expertise in mechanical, electrical and public health engineering, we design the systems that support buildings and create a delightful environment for the people who use them."
@sakaar_uk9 ай бұрын
best comment
@-vz-9 ай бұрын
this was the politest and longest way to say "never" I've ever seen
@TekkLuthor8 ай бұрын
They said the same things about building simple buildings back then. I'm no engineer but I imagine a building like that will need to be a core within a core within a core and every 100 floors or so should be able to shift in any direction to kind of compensate for it swinging
@dastankuspaev92177 ай бұрын
With new materials. Sure
@SevenMacEleven3 ай бұрын
@@TekkLuthorwtf are you talking about, the tallest tower atm was a struggle to build and they had to compensate but making it really thin at the top
@Kiwi27039 ай бұрын
Yeah we all know it's never gonna be built lol
@KatoombaTourGuide9 ай бұрын
Instead, I believe that they should make Transit Oriented Development ( TOD ). Don’t get me wrong the tower would save space, however if it’s all spread out surrounding say, a train station; it would make a community and a sense of belonging. One more reason to not make a giant skyscraper is the sun. When a skyscraper is made in front of the dawn of dusk points of the sun, it will block off light to the neighbouring street bellow… but that’s only for a small skyscraper.
@SnowTheKitsune9 ай бұрын
Well they tryibng build the line city.
@xxdesertstorm9 ай бұрын
for real the only people to believe this will be simps to OPEC+ nations as these nations won't be getting money once Western Nations say no to the price gouging Arabs they are
@red.aries14449 ай бұрын
Yes, but maybe they will at least build the foundation. Then they can dig the deepest hole ever for building a skyscraper...
@LogsMaggot9 ай бұрын
@@SnowTheKitsune the line that was originally supposed to be 170km long but will actually be around 2km in reality, if that? That line? If we go by that ratio, then this 2km tower's gonna be shorter than the apartment where I live lol
@Connorpellatt9 ай бұрын
Excellent content. This is exactly the sort of thing I subscribe for. I learned a lot here, cheers Fred and team
@aftonline8 ай бұрын
I would probably build not one tower, but a set of say 6 or 8 slender towers arranged in a circle, interconnected with horizontal sections between them at regular intervals, and a central tower which houses the express lift shaft that goes all the way to the top. The office or residential space would be in the horizontal sections as well as the vertical sections. The entire building would be cross braced for rigidity because of those horizontal sections, which could extend from the outer towers to the centre as well as connecting the towers around the perimeter. The idea is to minimize the vertical loading by restricting each tower to one lift. If your destination is in the top part of the tower you take the central express lift to the closest horizontal level, and then walk horizontally to one of the peripheral lifts to go the rest of the way up. The towers wouldn't be separated by more than about 50 to 100m so your horizontal walk would not be very far.
@maolcogi9 ай бұрын
500 floors, 500 cable cars, and no stairs or elevators. Emergency escape will be ziplining down the cable, or a parachute. xD
@Tony-op6xf9 ай бұрын
Parachutes 😅
@franciscodanconia43249 ай бұрын
A zip line with a 2km drop would be… exhilarating. And probably have to be 10km long. :)
@harbl999 ай бұрын
"In case of emergency, don parachute and yeet yourself out of the escape window."
@tientje1249 ай бұрын
A 2 km long slide is the dream of every child. And i guess a lot of adults would try it too😎
@krashd9 ай бұрын
@@harbl99 That would actually be fine for something like the Burj Kalifa, but in a city packed with other skyscrapers like NYC or Shanghai you would splat against the side of another skyscraper. 😂
@Jonassoe9 ай бұрын
Saudi Arabia and UAE seem like the kind of places where ambitious architects can just pitch their crazy projects to the rulers, and they don't have to go through any committees or bureaucracy to get started. Projects don't have to make sense or be economical, they just have to look cool and bring prestige to the country.
@FahadKhan-cz6cd9 ай бұрын
right
@hvglaser9 ай бұрын
Not to mention total disregard for ethical and environmental concerns.
@07419219 ай бұрын
There's no environmental concerns in the middle of the desert
@Bb131909 ай бұрын
@@0741921 building such a building would produce a lot of carbon, no matter the location, the problem is the construction. And of course, the exploitation of the building (maintenance, elevator, air conditionning).
@dg-hughes9 ай бұрын
If you think that's ambitious UAE wants to buy a chunk of coast in Egypt near Libya for $50B and build a new city there.
@AUZZEN049 ай бұрын
Big fan of architect Jack Harlow
@KatoombaTourGuide9 ай бұрын
…
@serebii6669 ай бұрын
😂😂
@rocketronin9 ай бұрын
You crazy 😂
@FauzanGhazy9 ай бұрын
For real 🥶😂
@lossless41299 ай бұрын
😂😂Lol
@LewisTL959 ай бұрын
Really interesting and technical (but easy to consume) video to watch - seeing whether the design could work conceptually at a high level and key challenges that would be faced. More like this Fred!
@lucasmartinez42487 ай бұрын
Having those two experts explaining this stuff was really interesting, nice video!
@thatitladi96509 ай бұрын
We need more of these expert discussions Fred... this was really fascinating to hear experts exchange ideas. Very insightful stuff
@JxH9 ай бұрын
3:26 On-Screen "28.5m²". *WRONG !!* That would be 5.34m x 5.34m = 28.5m², or about the size of two parking spaces. That tower is skinny, but it ain't that skinny. "m²" has a well-defined meaning, area. Don't confuse it with what some people say, "28.5 meters squared." People are supposed to know this.
@JxH9 ай бұрын
3:46 "133m²" Again, same error in units. 133m x 133m cannot be described as "133m²".
@Tr1111on9 ай бұрын
That’s embarrassing for Arup!
@TheCraigy839 ай бұрын
i saw that . Even 28x28 meters is very small for the height.. a 11story block of flats near me is around 15meter x 35meter footprint , its probably only 110ft 🤷♂️..
@bg739 ай бұрын
Well done - I noticed this too. I have an entertainment area that is 6m x 6m and I was thinking how on earth is that bigger than the base of that building???
@RobinNashVideos9 ай бұрын
You're right! But there's also no need to say it with a pretentious tone... In any case, it seems more like the editor's fault than the hosts, it's pretty clear that they MEANT length and the editor simply assumed it was area. Which isn't good ofc, but also, the editor presumably isn't an engineer. Even if they were, small slip ups like this happen all the time on post production. It's not gonna ruin anyone's life so really no point in getting angry or worked up about it Still good to point it out!
@takuan6509 ай бұрын
Why not a 2 km. high spiral staircase ? And a slide to go down. That'll keep You fit.
@franciscodanconia43249 ай бұрын
We all know the people that will occupy the top floors will be able to afford to commute by helicopter to the roof.
@saumyacow44359 ай бұрын
Make it a waterslide :)
@mitchell6you9 ай бұрын
spiral train on the outside of the building
@deadmxss9 ай бұрын
I just wanna thank everyone in making this video for using the SI units
@1queijocas8 ай бұрын
He is British, not American
@deadmxss8 ай бұрын
@@1queijocas no shit dude 🤯🤯
@1queijocas8 ай бұрын
@@deadmxss then why would he use imperial units? I don’t think you know this but the uk uses SI units
@deadmxss8 ай бұрын
@@1queijocas and the roads are still in miles and yards. Tell me you haven’t been to the UK without telling me
@1queijocas8 ай бұрын
@@deadmxss roads are the only place in the UK which hasn’t converted to SI. This is an engineering video and engineering is exclusive done in SI in the UK. And I’ve lived in the UK for the past 9 years, I work in engineering and the only place I see imperial units are roads or people height/weight.
@henene49 ай бұрын
3:28 There's a pretty big mistake there. 432 Park Ave isn't 28m² (28 square meters), it's 28m squared - thats over 700m². Same for the proposed tower - that would come out to over 17000m² with 133m sides.
@antonerlandsson9769 ай бұрын
Great video! This should be a series. A series with the same guys discussing different projects. Big love from Sweden.
@Arrynek019 ай бұрын
Can't believe I have to say it but... 133m by 133m is not 133 square meters. Probably should fix that.
@mx0r8 ай бұрын
I had to replay it multiple times, as our apartment is around that and it certainly is not larger than NYC block. 😅 It clicked me, when they included the side lenghts.
@-Muhammad_Ali-8 ай бұрын
True. 11.5x11.5 is going to be 133sq.m.
@ruprup-p1h9 ай бұрын
I love how he tries to zoom in on the printed picture at 2:09 :D
@MultiSciGeek9 ай бұрын
Hahahaha
@horribleIRUKANDJI8 ай бұрын
lоl
@Bannana-Smile8 ай бұрын
He wasn't 😂,i think he was trying to flaten/presse down the tracing paper against the underneath image/photo to see clearly and locate the other building.
@stephen-he4iw8 ай бұрын
I love the attempt to pinch and zoom on paper at 2:10
@drgeoffangel54229 ай бұрын
As a retired mechanical engineer, here's my thoughts on a structure that is so high, and thus so massive. I am not a civil engineer, but I would have thought that for such a structure to be built, it would need a foundation, at least a quarter of the total height, below the surface, perhaps even equal to a third of the total height. That would mean digging a huge hole down into the bedrock, which in itself could be a huge engineering structure. Of course, the building could be stablised like tall radio masks with " guy" rods coming down from the structure from various heights, and that would mean that the foundations, would not need to be so deep. The biggest problem for any structure so tall, is the mass, and thus the compressive stress at the foundations. One could envisigage a structure, that has cast iron at the foundations, up to a certain level, then steel, then an aluminium monocoque structure, there on up to the top. For stability, the width to height ratio has to be just right, and thus the foundations would have to cover a huge area, akin to the Effiel Tower. Maybe, they just scale up the Effiel tower design, with material adjustments for mass and stress, because that structure, has done pretty well so far. Can it be done, yes of course, when money, and sense is no object! But whoever designs it, will need to know what they are doing, especially when it comes to identifying all the possible loading conditions. Once it is built, the real practical problems start, like emergency staircases, you walk a freakin 2Km down, or up, if the lifts dont work!
@azeemabdul1433 ай бұрын
This comment needs to be pinned....love from an architect ❤
@tokiomitohsaka77703 ай бұрын
You’d probably need to switch to exotic materials like carbon fiber for the higher parts especially. Maybe even some high compressive strength ceramic materials like porcelain being added to the concrete in the foundation to make it handle the insane compressive loads, and keep holes for cables to keep tension across the different internal parts of the building so it won’t topple by wind. Also make ceiling height for each floor higher to reduce the number of floors and thus reduce the weight and occupancy. Also, unlike current skyscrapers with their counterweights dealing with wind, such a tall structure would likely experience low frequency standing wave oscillations from the wind and would require multiple pendulums to counter the motion for the peaks of the wave where constructive superposition would occur. Either way, this is a Richard measuring contest rather than practical. Still interesting from an engineering perspective.
@HakimFalkner9 ай бұрын
Classic engineer: “I can only really draw squares” … proceeds to draw a wonky parallelogram!
@Siranoxz9 ай бұрын
I find this quite ridiculous at this point.
@KatoombaTourGuide9 ай бұрын
Why don’t they just make TOD instead of like 1 giant building?
@Siranoxz9 ай бұрын
@@KatoombaTourGuide The Saudi´s have always been unrealistic with their expectations to eventually wow people.
@silvervixen0079 ай бұрын
Yeah what's the point
@ayushkumar-bg1xf9 ай бұрын
Because it’s not happening in west , till 2000 all westerners were measuring their development in terms of infrastructure but when china started overtaking in infrastructure they went silent on that front
@GLJosh9 ай бұрын
Being ridiculous IS the point.
@mr.cyprian9 ай бұрын
what a good channel - so interesting! well done to both!
@k7y9 ай бұрын
current height of Jeddah tower is 252 m from planed 1000m+. They just about build a quarter KM tower and they already talking about building a 2KM one
@leebloketube9 ай бұрын
Really enjoyed the video. Great to see something a bit different for the channel 👍🏻
@HelloHi-g2u9 ай бұрын
Always a good day when there is a new B1M video!
@HUNVilly9 ай бұрын
03:47 I don't quite understand 133 m2, is 11,5×11,5 meters. If the average city block is 80 meters wide, that should be more than enough. I'm not sure that the units of measurement are ok.
@lochkarteorg9 ай бұрын
I guess they meant 133 * 133 m2 and 28.5 * 28.5 m2 So: 17689m2 and 812m2
@mailxxxxxx9 ай бұрын
The two guys said it correctly. What that extrapolation gives you is a building with a footprint of 133m x 133m. The video editor just incorrectly „transformed“ that into 133m2.
@tommelfinger9 ай бұрын
28.5m2 should have been 28.5x28.5 m^2, the 2000 meter tower was 133mx133m. They messed it up :)
@Nounooon9 ай бұрын
Yeah I think the structural engineer went above his skillset trying to calculate a surface area. Hope he's not the one who was contracted to build the house I live in.
@bensblues9 ай бұрын
@@Nounooonneither of them are structural engineers, but Arup have the best engineers in the world. Clearly the video editor has misunderstood what they said.
@florin96869 ай бұрын
The footprint IS NOT 28.5m2. One side is 28.5m. That makes for a footprint of 812.25m2 respectively.
@manueledelisio9 ай бұрын
Great video, as usual! The funny bit was hearing ARUP's engineer ( Vini ) talking about the potential use of wind turbines in order to generate power... in split-screen with some stock footage of the Strata tower in London, with its wind turbines turned off ( forevah )
@rsn93949 ай бұрын
one of my fav channels. more videos with construction guys and architects drawing and teaching!
@into_the_void9 ай бұрын
Constructed by ACME.. lead designer Wiley Coyote
@m.32579 ай бұрын
😂
@raymondjurie90479 ай бұрын
It'll be about as successful as Wile E. Coyote's usual endeavours, one would imagine.
@SeanMatheson-n3x8 ай бұрын
Yup, it's the modern, real-life equivalent of Wiley Coyote's sling-shot technology.
@Amm17ar9 ай бұрын
This was awesome guys. You guys already put out insanely high quality content....but this was perfect. Its always nice to hear professionals in the field giving their opinion on the feasibility and possibilities of projects around the world. Always gives us a very unique point of view of the challenges and techniques. Also having a bit of a sneak peak into how some great minds would go about getting something like this built. Really unique and fascinating work. Would love to see more of these two and/or others sprinkled in every now and then on new and proposed infrastructure and projects. Im not a very smart person so I love hearing people a lot smarter than me dumb it down and simplify it. Either way, I love hearing people who know a bunch about their field and love what they do. It really shows, and it always fascinates me. Keep up the awesome work!
@rednekokie9 ай бұрын
The only question is WHY? Unless they wish to reproduce the tower of Babel. Utterly ridiculous!
@RichardFraser-y9t9 ай бұрын
You do know that they are both fictional, right?
@kayrosis55239 ай бұрын
Why? Simple. MBS doubts his sexual prowess, but he has lots of money, so throws them at making something... Large
@elhoward74409 ай бұрын
Like many things men do, it can all be explained by their futile attempts to compensate for their tiny manhood...
@HALLish-jl5mo9 ай бұрын
Actually there is a good reason. Oil states want to bring in other business to create a service based economy. That can be self sufficient, but you need a reason to start moving there. Projects like this are supposed to kill two birds with one stone: loads of services move to the city to complete the project, and they stay because there's all this great stuff around. In theory. But I don't have any better ideas other than going back to camels when the oil runs out.
@TheGamingMotionTGM9 ай бұрын
Tower of Babel itself couldn't be infinitely high to reach God since the ancient builders will lack of oxygen.
@JP_TaVeryMuch9 ай бұрын
Quite the best video you've given us this year, thank you. No doubt a great insight and explanation of behind the scenes considerations engineers are faced with when architects come a-knocking on their door, for those of us who fancy that we know a thing or two already, it was an interesting reminder and led to so many more questions. Was there no room to mention the latest in pre-booking lift journeys; effects of gravity on pumps getting water that high; even the benefits of cylindrical towers with those wind blades spiralling up them? And and and? Please can you consider a part two going into such details.
@GeekyMedia9 ай бұрын
Different kind of B1M video, but I really like it. I hope we get more like it
@georgesos9 ай бұрын
The real question is not how. The real question is Why?
@chrisrosenkreuz239 ай бұрын
cos they literally going bankrupt thats why ^^
@shimmy71699 ай бұрын
Megalomaniac dictator ego
@PROVOCATEURSK9 ай бұрын
Because someone hiding behind a big lake is scared to set them on the right path.
@hsvr9 ай бұрын
@@chrisrosenkreuz23no they ain’t
@theunknownguy2659 ай бұрын
@chrisrosenkreuz23 last time I checked, our economy is growing
@Arational9 ай бұрын
What are they compensating for?
@KatoombaTourGuide9 ай бұрын
Idk
@mark-ish9 ай бұрын
The failure of the line.
@Netizpossible9 ай бұрын
Probably the fact they havent finished the Jeddah tower yet.
@teafanatic84529 ай бұрын
trying to distract us from all the human rights violations that take place there
@marcolini_9 ай бұрын
They have 0 women in decision making positions and it shows. If you only have fat old men smoking hooka making decisions, that's the result.
@Enhancedlies9 ай бұрын
great video, honestyl this is the best stuff! detailed explainers
@jamesney38519 ай бұрын
I really liked this format of video! Hopefully it does well, I look forward to more
@Cloxxki9 ай бұрын
Few architects look to tripods. They work great. Large floors could be spanning between the three legs to form parks. Like Eifeltower has 4 legs. With the leaning-in legs, elevators could even be simply vertical cables like orbital elevators proposed. Bypassing the structure, supoorted from above, very lightweight and efficient way to do it. When building the 2000 meter tripod, from the first cantilevered park, you have the support needed to be stable.
@bc_v019 ай бұрын
The area measurements in the beginning of the video are wrong.
@KatoombaTourGuide9 ай бұрын
🤓
@Mattwattss9 ай бұрын
I’ve been noticing lots of mistakes in their videos recently
@AlphaGeekgirl9 ай бұрын
Yeah, 3:53 … puny two bedroom apartment has a footprint of 60 m²
@tommelfinger9 ай бұрын
28.5m2 should have been 28.5x28.5 m^2, the 2000 meter tower was 133mx133m. They messed it up :)
@cd0u50c99 ай бұрын
Yep just came to say the same, it must be off by roughly a factor of 10..
@FP-ty9qf9 ай бұрын
Waste coming out, did you say? Dubai asks you to hold their beer!
@Flumphinator9 ай бұрын
No, that’s not beer…
@richardpavlov4429 ай бұрын
Inspired by famous poop trucks i envision poop helicopters and perhaps even poop catapults and cannons to deal with this problem
@AlexSSB9 ай бұрын
"There are other ways to keep something tall and thin upright" That's what she said
@citibear579 ай бұрын
What are you saying? The tower should be covered in blue-coloured glass, and called Burj Viagra? 😂
@Rakhtor9 ай бұрын
I was going to say something like "Now you have my attention."
@isiomaagulebu8919 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@FreeFinca9 ай бұрын
@@citibear57 👏🏻🤣
@brianmclean62939 ай бұрын
The idea to make this video was great! Neat to see educated people working on an interesting problem, thanks!
@WowIndescribable7 ай бұрын
Great format! More of these, please!
@xvor_tex85779 ай бұрын
"Disregarding all the laws of physics" this is this project's perfect description.
@oiartsun9 ай бұрын
The notion of a 2km building calls to mind the huge mega-buildings depicted in Blade Runner (1982). I wonder how feasible it would be to build such a structure with a large, wide base, rather than as thin as possible.
@dalemsilas84259 ай бұрын
Good idea.
@edmush20109 ай бұрын
It would be like Neom, but square. :) Too expensive to build. It could use more material than a couple of Three Gorges Dams and some 20 years of construction.
@scipioafricanus58719 ай бұрын
Now I want them to build it just so I can look at a facade full giant commercial with an Asian woman drinking Coca Cola...
@mcribbedherpleasure6689 ай бұрын
Notice the were pyramid design, not skinny pencils
@gaemr_o51476 ай бұрын
I'm not sure concrete and steel could support that
@marcinjemio88579 ай бұрын
432 Park Avenue footprint is not 28.5m2! Each side is 28.5m long, so it is 28.5m x 28.5m = 812.25m2. Still very slim for such a high building, but it definitely is not 28.5m2 shown at 3:27. Same applies to a suggested footprint of the 2 km high building. I assume is side would be 133m long, thus the footprint would be 133m x 133m = 17689m2 and not 133m2 shown at 3:52.
@seb_6179 ай бұрын
Came here looking for this comment. 28m2 is basically the size of a standard living room; would have thought they’d know a bit better.
@StefanoVerugi9 ай бұрын
thought as much, such a mistake is quite embarrassing for a channel promoting engineering
@TrackCityBand59 ай бұрын
You can see the look on the other guys face when that happens. This was not a great video in my opinion. Why would we want to see them tracing and drawing images that are out of proportion 😂
@MrSWphoto9 ай бұрын
I love that at the end they put what they said into an image generator, the results are pretty cool!
@Hectillion3 ай бұрын
6:51 this is an easy problem to solve just have 1 fast lift which stops at every 25 the floor and then have another lot of lifts which go from every floor between 0 - 25 or 25 - 50 etc that way you only have 2 shafts which can take the same as 20 lift shafts
@zukaro9 ай бұрын
What I want to see is a 2km tall building that's also 2km wide and is an entirely self contained city. Just a massive cube in the middle of the desert.
@slaveofjesus38789 ай бұрын
The King of All is preparing a 1,500 mile cube city (with new physics) that will come down to a new earth in His good time! Only those of the faith of Abraham will see that city though.
@carlramirez63399 ай бұрын
@@slaveofjesus3878 I bet MBS thinks you're referring to him.
@dw5s9 ай бұрын
Or a pyramid!
@llook8 ай бұрын
@@dw5s was thinking the same thing
@_Diana_S6 ай бұрын
@@llook Pyramid building was proposed a few decades back for Tokyo. It was envisioned to be 4 km high. The project was not even considered seriously because a) no construction materials could bear such load b) not enough oxygen on higher levels,
@A380_Flyer9 ай бұрын
Imagine taking the stairs in an emergency
@donc-m49009 ай бұрын
Fire pole!😂
@highcap49529 ай бұрын
maybe the upper floors get wing gliders ;)
@jimsvideos72019 ай бұрын
20 centimeters apiece, figure -40000- 10000 of them? You'd need new shoes halfway down.
@donc-m49009 ай бұрын
@jimsvideos7201 American here, so metric is an unknown measurement. But at 20cm times 10,000 steps, wouldn't that be 200,000cm or 2km?
@jimsvideos72019 ай бұрын
@@donc-m4900 1.24 miles, 8 inches apiece, yeah, 10000 or so.
@LarsRR9 ай бұрын
Getting the square meters that wrong really makes me question their expertise. How can two experts both see „28.5 square meters“ as the footprint for a 426 meter tall building and just nod along? 28.5 square meters is the size of my living room 😂
@andreelliott4679 ай бұрын
Love the idea from architect and engineer on this project.
@bartekd98859 ай бұрын
That's a second time I've heard of Arup at this channel. Seems like some hi-skilled engineering company and the guys here are really explaining stuff pretty nice. Would be great if you'd do a video about that company.
@mrsir17259 ай бұрын
I've never seen jack harlow this quiet
@101bennyc9 ай бұрын
432 park avenue is not 28.5m2,it’s 28m on both sides. So it actually 784m2. Also 28m2 is like two parking spaces.
@tobik26279 ай бұрын
the footpring of 432 park avenue is 28.5 m² ? thats 5 x 5 meters? and the upscaled version with 133m² is 11 x 11m. some things wrong. one side of the square with 28,5/133m is what was meant i guess.
@NoBSTravelChannel9 ай бұрын
We need a series on how skyscraper / building is built from start to finish. I want to see the differences between architects and engineers and who exactly designs what etc.
@sohovulture879 ай бұрын
'.....you're welcome...' hahahaha! Very interesting indeed. Like this format with engineer and architect hypothesising. Good stuff!
@fuzzylon9 ай бұрын
I think there needs to be a follow up video - Experts explain why certain rulers, governments, etc. feel a need to build a tallest building just for the sake of being tall - when there's no practical need for it nor for the accomodation and facilities such a building brings.
@AL-lh2ht9 ай бұрын
I brings investment and diversifies the economy. Its that simple. they are building a lot of stuff besides the big cold projects that get attenton.
@GeekyMedia9 ай бұрын
They usually go more into context of video topics on their podcast
@BlessedHash9 ай бұрын
How do we short this project?
@jameslyddall9 ай бұрын
As a car guy this is like me saying "I'm gonna finish my V8 engine swap build". It'll happen, one day.
@epale8 ай бұрын
Lidl 😂
@iRiShNFT9 ай бұрын
Great work , I wouldn't be surprised if they did use some of your ideas. Great episode.
@citibear579 ай бұрын
25 years in the future: Person A: Didn't you see me waving at you from my 483rd floor window?? Person B: Nope!!
@chumleyk7 ай бұрын
I love the way they are trying to be incredibly polite just in case they win a contract for work in the middle east...
@donc-m49009 ай бұрын
Where do you put the sewage treatment plant? Burj Khalifa trucks it out daily.
@chrisrosenkreuz239 ай бұрын
to everyone's olfactory delight
@doujinflip9 ай бұрын
No, Dubai has since dug in their piped sewage network. The remaining pump trucks nowadays empty flood water and sand-clogged drainage.
@AL-lh2ht9 ай бұрын
the Burj Khalifa has been connected to the sewage system for almost a decade now....
@jamesogden77569 ай бұрын
The roof. For the free solar and wind energy... to aerosolize that shit all over the city. 😂
@chrisrosenkreuz239 ай бұрын
@@jamesogden7756 hey not to crack wise or anything but you might be onto something there. Imagine if they spread that shit all over the desert instead. LUSH
@pacldawson9 ай бұрын
Given that KSA has scaled back The Line to about 2% of its original length, I’m not holding my breath for groundbreaking of a 2km skyscraper
@ThexBorg9 ай бұрын
Wind sheer is the biggest challenge, but don't forget the thinning atmosphere above 1km. There may be some air pressure differentials above 1000 metres. It could be on a rotating base and shaped like a fin and the tower rotates based on wind direction. If fixed, the basement would need to be about 1/4 -> 1/3 the height.
@darringreen86309 ай бұрын
What about 5 towers that are 200 floors tall, and then the remainder of the tower extending from a platform on top of that? Distribute the weight evenly between the 5. Yes, there will have to be an elevator (lift) change to reach the top floors, but that can take place on a rain protected vegitation platform, like a park 1km in the sky.
@prxzmsAU9 ай бұрын
if this ever actually gets made, you know that ill be yapping about this all the time
@KatoombaTourGuide9 ай бұрын
100%
@koaschten9 ай бұрын
7:30 cable elevators won't cut it in a 2000 m high rise building. No word about about options like the Thyssen Krupp "vertical magnetic levitation elevator" which they call "MULTI" ? Bonus, it can not only move vertically but also horizontally, so you have a vertical shaft and when you reach your level you take the exit to a parking position and leave the cabin. Bsically dozens of autonomous cabins zipping though the building. They go at a targeted speed of 6m/s sp 2000m in about 5min 30sec, but passengers will have access to a cabin every 15 to 30 seconds.
@JeffDeWitt9 ай бұрын
Ahh... a Turbolift.
@mikezy82909 ай бұрын
I'm building my 20km skyscraper in my swampy backyard 😊😊😊
@KatoombaTourGuide9 ай бұрын
If it’s swampy then… how exactly?? Good luck!
@mikezy82909 ай бұрын
@@KatoombaTourGuide I have a LINE I wont cross 😂
@KatoombaTourGuide9 ай бұрын
@@mikezy8290 ok I get it now
@fleshreap9 ай бұрын
Eagerly awaiting to see the news and various youtubers cover your 100% real project!
@mikezy82909 ай бұрын
@@fleshreap 😂💯
@senju20249 ай бұрын
Now this was very educational for me. Thank you so much! Great Job!!!
@David-ud9ju2 ай бұрын
I appreciate that the engineer and architect are conforming to stereotypes in how they look. That's always reassuring.
@NSaNelydangerous9 ай бұрын
I don't understand the footprint at the beginning at 03:25. It says 432 has a 28.5m² footprint. That's a studio apartment. I don't understand how it goes on to say the 2km building has a 133m² footprint either. What are these figures supposed to mean?
@passakornkarnprawatlerdwat52469 ай бұрын
432m tall building has 28.5sq.m. footprints so 2km building, which is about 4 times as tall, should at least have 4 times bigger footprint. The point is that the footprint would be stupidly big for a super tall building.
@andreas.richter9 ай бұрын
Yes but the numbers are wrong… 25sqm is 5x5m, which is the length of an SUV (which should be a common us measurement 😉)
@Samuel_J19 ай бұрын
Yeah, it should be 28.5m each side, which gives 812.25m². For the silly tower it would be 17689m²
@sebastian854299 ай бұрын
they mean (28,5m)².... 28 meter squareD. understandebly this is very different from 28 square meter... i guess some writer/editor got this mixed up
@NSaNelydangerous9 ай бұрын
@@Samuel_J1 That makes more sense, it's the length of one side, not a sqm value.
@lovelywaz9 ай бұрын
They better install Showers in every Elevator. Plenty of time to take a shower and get yourself ready to go out during the elevator ride from top floor all the way to the bottom! 😏😏
@krisstopher82599 ай бұрын
I designed a hypertall in 15 minutes using an X shape and 9 interconnected skyscrapers starting from lower thinner ones on the edges and then increasing the height by 100% and the width by 30%. Two rows of them x4 wings excluding the central and most robust tower in the middle. There are two interconnections (30% of the total height, then 60% and the tower in the middle is maximum elevation. I'm really drunk but i've been designing skyscrapers for fun since 2000, lol. It's an accurate 3D sketch but i can't really show it cause youtube sux
@velisvideos62089 ай бұрын
X shape? Sell it to Musk.
@Zebra_M9 ай бұрын
I designed one too, by skipping the first 1.98 kilometers I was able to drastically simplify the design. Getting it up there and making it stay there without anything underneath will be a challenge, but I'll leave that up to the construction teams to figure out.
@franciscodanconia43249 ай бұрын
So essentially using 1000 year old flying buttress technology. Good idea.
@franciscodanconia43249 ай бұрын
@@Zebra_Mhelium balloons. Lots of them.
@diantonovich3 ай бұрын
Fascinating engineering. I’ve been in Jeddah, that building is horrifying and it’s sucks. I would not like to spend any time in a 2km building like this
@mhuncho3139 ай бұрын
Every video of yours is 5 star quality information 👌 brilliant
@eat_ze_bugs9 ай бұрын
But why though? They have so much land available.
@franciscodanconia43249 ай бұрын
Ego
@AL-lh2ht9 ай бұрын
You know most of said land is worthless wasteland. Like, you spend time outside it's so bad.
@visionentertainment80068 ай бұрын
why not
@MatroX679 ай бұрын
didn't know Andy Serkis was an architekt
@KatoombaTourGuide9 ай бұрын
Same!
@donc-m49009 ай бұрын
Who designed the Two Towers?
@stompingzebra11619 ай бұрын
How about completing: Oxacon, Sindalah, The Line, Trojena, Leyja, Epicon, Siranna, Utamo, Norlana, Aquellum, Zardun, Xaynor, Elenan, Gidori, Treyam, Jeddah Tower, Qiddiya and the Dragon Ball Theme Park before announcing a 2km skyscraper???
@jeremytheimer7443Ай бұрын
The structure shape used by the Jedda tower and the CN tower really does limit space. The CN tower is purely a vanity project, the lower 2/3 of the building only has enough space for an elevator and stairs. The main load is a restaurant and viewing area in the middle. The biggest challenge of building 2km is finding a way to make it profitible.
@Sanobot22 күн бұрын
The numbers for area in the beginning around 03:50 are wrong. What they meant is (28.5m)^2, not 28.5 m^2 and (133m)^2, not 133m^2 respectively.
@xXpearcider19Xx9 ай бұрын
It got the world laughing
@KatoombaTourGuide9 ай бұрын
Hi
@a_d_a_m9 ай бұрын
but the joke was on meeee
@haris.199 ай бұрын
Neom where? Jeddah tower where? 😂
@jamesogden77569 ай бұрын
Now we're cooking with glue! 😅 (Because it makes about the same amount of sense: none)
@n3ff8489 ай бұрын
I wish someone would suggest the Prince to build a skyscraper to the moon, to really show of the Arabia superiority. I mean why settle with the Line horizontally, when you can have a VERTICALLY line?!
@tonymccann19789 ай бұрын
Class video, well presented, well done.
@KristovMars9 ай бұрын
As a fan of Adam Something, I expected my viewing experience to just be me laughing and/or shouting about stupid giant ego-projects. But I was VERY pleasantly surprised to see these guys taking a real crack at "what if" - some of their concepts actually look pretty interesting. Hopefully we'll see them implemented in a (much smaller) building that actually gets built. Got some good world-building ideas for my spec-fiction work too, so thankyou! Have a sub!
@jieth_9 ай бұрын
name of 2km tall building/tower ?
@KatoombaTourGuide9 ай бұрын
The 2KM building
@mark-ish9 ай бұрын
Y2K
@tomvg879 ай бұрын
Barad-dûr
@m.32579 ай бұрын
Burj Arabia
@dalemsilas84259 ай бұрын
Skidmark
@georgeblackwell23069 ай бұрын
What exactly are they smoking when they come up with these projects?
@teafanatic84529 ай бұрын
billions of dollars in oil money
@-_James_-9 ай бұрын
Camelshit.
@666LonesomeSailor9 ай бұрын
Only the good stuff we´ll never get! :D
@MisterMotel9 ай бұрын
Nothing to explain because it will never work. just like NEOM, the line the palm islands etc etc.
@donelmediterraneo86269 ай бұрын
Actually everything that has been made in Dubai works : Palm Jumeirah, Burj al-Arab, Burj Khalifah It's the saudis who're announcing crazy non-sense projects just to catch-up what UAE did 20 years ago
@papendiayediouf51669 ай бұрын
1:50, the way he scaled the size of the project was smooth...