“Todays topic is Christianity” me hearing it for the 1,000th time : LETS GOOOOO
@lordlongstroke59893 ай бұрын
And yet you still believe all the lies...
@Notypls1013 ай бұрын
@@lordlongstroke5989 yep all the 100,000s of people who died being thrown to lions claiming Jesus is lord and claiming what they saw was correct were lying
@edwardjoseph80076 ай бұрын
The reason the Jews were so hard to govern was because the Romans said you had to follow our laws but the Jews believed that following roman law was an affront to their own beliefs. Most cultures were perfectly fine following roman law in addition to their own personal beliefs but for the Jews they believed if was incompatible hence the irishness
@tuckerbugeater5 ай бұрын
They kept them around
@hermitcard44945 ай бұрын
Thats how monotheistic think. You can always keep peace and cooperation with polytheist because they can agree with different interpretations. YOU CANNOT KEEP PEACE with monotheists, they wont obey, not tolerate others interpretations and eventually convert them. Judaism did it by force, Christianity did it by pressure, Islam a combination of both. That's why no polytheist kingdom has conquered and spread as much as monotheist.
@דניאל-ש2ה5 ай бұрын
@@hermitcard4494 Greek empires, Roman Empire, Mongol Empire all were pagan. Now tell what exactly Judaism did violently? Lived in a tiny kingdom and were exercising their ethno-religion?When pagan invaders came and forced them to abandon their ancestral cult?
@QuizmasterLaw5 ай бұрын
I don't think that is the case. It is the restrictions on Jews following Jewish law which have however often led to social conflicts, sometimes (infrequently) right up to war, not the fact Jews also had to obey the law of an occupier.
@geesixnine5 ай бұрын
It's because they remember how Cyrus the great treated them under their Empire. Also, in the Bible, the Jews strayed from God, hence their exile from Jerusalem initially in the Persian conquest
@BMWE90HQ6 ай бұрын
Constantine did not convert Rome to Christianity . He legalized it and converted himself but it was Theodosius who made it the official religion.
@joshsolomon48255 ай бұрын
35:36 He didn't convert the empire, he just make Christianity legal
@spoonfulofdreams87906 ай бұрын
Armenia was the first state to convert to Christianity not Ethiopia
@tianming49646 ай бұрын
Actually Osroene/Edessa was the first in 200 AD. Didn't last as an independent kingdom for long though.
@ThePoopsmith-123456 ай бұрын
I am Armenian, in part, I always believed that Armenia was first but not it was Osroene.
@robleahy57595 ай бұрын
Georgia was the first Christian kingdom.
@robleahy57595 ай бұрын
Ireland converted around the same time. Go figure the distance.
@ThePoopsmith-123455 ай бұрын
@@robleahy5759 no, Georgia didn’t convert until early 400s ce. Armenia officially converted in 301ce and is well documented. Osroene converted in 200ce but the kingdom fell in 214ce.
@obiwankenobi68716 ай бұрын
As a Eastern Orthodox Christian☦️ this was great to watch but also painful simultaneously, he paints a lot of things with personal spiritual biases often
@algro95676 ай бұрын
Can you go into detail about what these personal spiritual biases are? I just want to understand your perspective as someone from the Eastern sphere.
@charliedontsurf3345 ай бұрын
We all have biases.
@samueldietschi42785 ай бұрын
As a catholic, same. specially when he talks about the Eucharist being psychodelics
@charliedontsurf3345 ай бұрын
@@samueldietschi4278 I need a lot of evidence before I can buy that the Eucharist was a psychedelic.
@abbacab775 ай бұрын
The book is called "The Immortality Key" by Brian C. Muraresku if you actually want sources.
@julian98985 ай бұрын
"Once you imagine the Christian church as a bunch of multi-ethnic working class people, it looks a lot different."
@HunnysPlaylists4 ай бұрын
Because you are trying to justify your own religion, not presenting The Actual Church.
@corterapidoetramontina29043 ай бұрын
Do not forget the psychodelic wine 🍷🍇 😅
@julian98983 ай бұрын
@@HunnysPlaylists im not justifying anything. I was quoting a line from the video that i thought was interesting 🤷♂️
@HunnysPlaylists3 ай бұрын
@@julian9898 you saw stnism on your screen and began to worsh1p.
@HunnysPlaylists3 ай бұрын
@@corterapidoetramontina2904 Communion Wine Is Pure Water and Genetically Pure Red Grapes, all of which Blessed.
@SD1Airsoft4 ай бұрын
"I'm a Christian" and then its just nonstop heresies, half truths, lies, and rumors.. Rudyard I love ya but you really got to stop these faulures
@m3c4nyku434 ай бұрын
It's because he's a Ma -son. Not a Christian.
@acem825 ай бұрын
1. The Eucharist (Communion) was not (originally) a hallucinogen. It literally was the Passover bread! This claptrap comes from 1 of 2 fallacies: A. Everything needs a mechanistic explanation. This is obviously false. B. These people absolutely need to find some way to make Christianity “dirty” or a trick so they can discount it. Not only is this claim nonsensical, it also violates the concept of Ephesians 5:18 “Don’t be drunk with wine, because that will ruin your life. Instead, be filled with the Holy Spirit” and 1 Peter 4:3-4 “For you have spent enough time in the past doing what pagans choose to do-living in debauchery, lust, drunkenness, orgies, carousing and detestable idolatry.” 2. It wasn't simply claimed by Christians that Jesus died, it's denied by pretty much zero historians. He lived, was condemned, and was executed. All the relevant sources say such. 3. There are *not* lost books of the Bible! There were a bunch of books in the 1st 2 centuries that claimed or implied that they were authoritative ...and they were rejected by the early Church for very good reasons. 4. Please stop the constantly disproven claptrap about December 25th (or Christmas in general) being some sort of pagan holiday. It wasn't. Any reference that the pagans celebrated that day post dates references that Christians celebrated that day. In fact, it's the pagans who tried to steal the day from the Christians! Why December 25th? There was an old belief that prophets died on the day they were conceived. They knew Jesus died March 25th, so they went back (Edit: actually forwards, as @Ch-ew9tm points out below) 9 months to December 25th, and that's when they celebrated his birth. … Given I've found errors in other history you've presented, and a lot here (in a subject I know well), I'm really wondering why I'd trust you to avoid pitfalls of historical thought in other subjects. After all, just because someone wrote it in a book, that doesn't mean it's correct!
@TheFifthofFive5 ай бұрын
Yeah, a lot of what he said in the video just drove me crazy. I think he just reads random books on the subject but doesn't check the quality of the source. I usually really like his video but after this it made me realize he doesn't know how to filter out bad sources.
@johnnyboy25375 ай бұрын
The pattern with Rudyard is that he's great when it comes to the big picture but usually gets the details wrong so the comments are usually good for correcting and balancing him out
@grogdizzy58145 ай бұрын
You don't know about saturnalia and the winter solstice yet claim to know everything about Christianity? I think faith relies on ignorance.
@acem825 ай бұрын
@@grogdizzy5814 1. I don't know everything about Christianity. I'm not God. 2. I know about all the claims that December 25th was a pagan holiday. The issue with these claims is that they post-date our evidence that December 25th was already being celebrated as Jesus' birthday. They also ignore that we already know *why* they celebrated it then, in that it was thought to have been when Jesus was conceived. InspiringPhilosophy has a dozen or so videos on this subject.
@grogdizzy58145 ай бұрын
@@acem82 like i said, faith relies on ignorance
@Chris-es3wf6 ай бұрын
Here before the reformation in the comments starts.
@BrockSamson185 ай бұрын
Remember, Jesus literally and actually rose from the dead and now sits at the right hand of The Father.
@abbacab775 ай бұрын
"scoot over, Michael."
@thorpeaaron11105 ай бұрын
He didn't.
@deitchj0035 ай бұрын
@@thorpeaaron1110you are a sad person and I pray for you
@BrockSamson185 ай бұрын
@@thorpeaaron1110 Pinochet recognized this Truth.
@mountainmanmike10145 ай бұрын
But on which side of the moon?
@Taiyama25 ай бұрын
There's a lot wrong here, alas. You can tell that Rudyard's high openness (he mentioned he's on the far right of that bellcurve) sometimes leads him into traps, since he wants to assume the truth is always hidden and needs to be uncovered rather than being out in the open. The bread and wine is "just" bread and wine in material terms. The magic is that it's also the body and blood of Christ.
@Drummr884 ай бұрын
Wrong. Christ was sacrificed ONCE, and now sits at the right hand of the Father. Jesus says we're to take communion in "remembrance" of Him. Transubstanciation is pagan, superstitious nonsense, unfortunately, and is intended to keep believers dependent on the Roman Catholic institution.
@Taiyama24 ай бұрын
@@Drummr88 A. I'm Anglican, not Catholic. I don't believe in transubstantiation either. I believe in the Real Presence a la Luther. B. Is omnipresence an aspect of God?
@memphisallen80216 ай бұрын
Christ is lord and king!!
@history19826 ай бұрын
Lol
@DeFu-dt4qt6 ай бұрын
Naw 😂
@michaelgranholm75986 ай бұрын
Christ is lord and king.
@ShivanshThakur-sh8ub6 ай бұрын
Nope.
@maryhildreth7546 ай бұрын
Candace?
@Rocknrolldaddy81-xy8ur4 ай бұрын
“Pontus Pilot = Deca Records X 3” Rudyard Lynch Awesome - I love this channel and his other channel. Keep em coming Rudy!
@scottanos99815 ай бұрын
Rudyard, I think you might find a book on the history of the turbulance in the early Christian Church to be interesting. It's by James E. Talmage and is titled "The Great Apostasy". You were discussing various groups like gnostics trying to infiltrate the Christians from almost the beginning, and this can help explain how even the Apostle Paul was writing in the Epistle of Jude over the matter. Also, I think the third group you were thinking of among the Jews were named the Sadducees. Hope this helps!
@temujanradari11055 ай бұрын
Didn't know they were Hellenistic... Always thought they were lovers... as they were Sad, you see
@carteraskelson7825 ай бұрын
Great Book!
@haraldthi4 ай бұрын
There's an easy alternate explanation to psychedelics in the Eucharist by the way: The Roman Catholic church claims that they are literally transforming the wine of Eucharist into the blood of Jesus by magic ritual, even to this day. And if people literally believed in that, I can understand how they were scared. No need for psychedelics.
@Byronjesk60046 ай бұрын
“As a Christian I’m legally obligated to say it was all God’s plan.” Ha! This man barely conceals his non-belief. Very edgy.
@TheGreenKnight5005 ай бұрын
He's just not a blind adherent to ideology.
@deitchj0035 ай бұрын
@@TheGreenKnight500you have your name as a knight. Who are based on Christianity. You cannot escape God.
@FozzyBBear5 ай бұрын
@@deitchj003 "the green knight" is literally a paleo-British demonic icon, a legendary trickster archetype akin to Loki in Norse mythology.
@DrakusLuthos5 ай бұрын
@@FozzyBBear The Green Knight is a figure from the Arthurian tale of Gawain and the Green Knight, most likely some sort of fae spirit. If you want to know how the faithful considered tales such as this, look no further than J. R. R. Tolkien, whom penned a loving rendition of the tale in poetic verse. He was a devout Catholic.
@spoonfulofdreams87906 ай бұрын
Christ is king!
@rgeipoj3255 ай бұрын
No
@spoonfulofdreams87905 ай бұрын
@@rgeipoj325 god bless you!
@bryantstudentd383129 күн бұрын
Amen
@Noname-iq1gz27 күн бұрын
I’m your king and daddy
@shroomsopenminds36239 күн бұрын
Christ said specifically not to call him or any man king or master or rabbi
@playmaka20076 ай бұрын
The problem: "One of the best traits of Christianity is it's adaptability" @18:20 I know what you mean in that humans have tried to adapt "Christianity" to make it palpable to them However Hebrews 13:8 directly contradicts this. Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever. Christ, and what he tells us it means to follow him, is the least adaptable thing imaginable.
@ikengaspirit30635 ай бұрын
I think you're confusing what he means there. I don't think he's talking of changing doctrine but changing organization. Christianity has managed to survive in many different forms from as organized state religion to as decentralized as having no priesthood. It has managed in agriculturalist and pastoralist societies etc.
@felippogaglianoneneto6214 ай бұрын
The adaptability of christianity is not about changing the message of Christ's teachings, it will always stay the same, but rather the presentation. Paul says in 1 Corinthians 9.20-22: To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law), so as to win those under the law. To those not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law), so as to win those not having the law. To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all people so that by all possible means I might save some.
@charliedontsurf3345 ай бұрын
“There was room for Yahweh on Mt Olympus, but no room for the Olympians in the Holy of Holies.” The Casual Historian. There was no way the Jews would worship other gods after the Babylonian Exile.
@TheGreenKnight5005 ай бұрын
@@charliedontsurf334 The tribe still seeks revenge to this day.
@charliedontsurf3345 ай бұрын
@@TheGreenKnight500 Which tribe?
@jon94285 ай бұрын
@@TheGreenKnight500 For what, not letting the Olympians sit on the Holy of Holies? What are they seeking revenge for?
@HunnysPlaylists4 ай бұрын
@@jon9428 against God For Giving Us His Church.
@HunnysPlaylists4 ай бұрын
pgn "gods" are dmns by the way.
@Interne738594 ай бұрын
The Virgin Mary absolutely doesn’t come from Isis.
@hismajesty62726 ай бұрын
It spread because the hearts and minds of Judea, Rome, and beyond were open to the Fullness of Truth, the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
@Meow-gp5nk5 ай бұрын
Christard coping as per usual
@Drummr884 ай бұрын
@@Meow-gp5nkHaha, you're a few ounces shy between the ears. 🤣
@hologramjosh5 ай бұрын
Good video but a few notes: - Rodney Stark argues convincingly that early adopters of Christianity were largely of the upwardly mobile middle class. A better analogy might be a small business owner rather than a walmart worker. - Calling the Essenes "hippies" might be misleading. They observed the ritual law very strictly, but did so in isolated communities not unlike later Christian monasteries. - The third group were called the Sadducees and represented the aristocratic class. They had the most power and best relations with Rome, hence the trend towards Hellenization. - The Rest is History did a good podcast debunking the idea that Xmas was stolen from pagans. Likewise Christians traditionally did not depict God the Father in artwork and depictions of the Father as a Zeus-like bearded man are usually renaissance and later.
@WhatifAltHist5 ай бұрын
Interesting. Thanks
@SacClass6506 ай бұрын
I love Diarmaid MacCulloch's description of Christianity: 'It is a dialogue between Judaism and Classical philosophy.' (His works on the history of Christianity are exemplary, highly recommend.)
@UrbanBard14 ай бұрын
I can't consider myself a good Christian, because I struggle with it so much. But, being WOKE seems insane. Partly, this is because I have been influenced by the Stoics. Christianity, to my mind, is about conforming myself to God's wishes. "Love God with all my heart, soul and mind and love my neighbor as myself. " Stoicism pursues the Best life by changing how we think about whatever happens to us. External events can be awful or disconcerting, but we have no idea what good can come from those events. So, a Stoic asks "what lesson are we supposed to learn from this?" Thus, a Stoic practices the four virtues: pursue Wisdom, exercise Temperance (or moderation), be Just (doing the right thing) and possessing Courage. I believe God wants these actions from us. Thus. we are expected to act toward other people, by being modest, gentle, kind, mature, peaceful and selfless, where it makes sense. God has given us a brain so we can determine what is the wise response in any situation. Nothing is automatic, nor must we necessarily allow ourselves to be manipulated. I ask, instead, "What does God think is wise?" While being WOKE looks like Live Action Role Playing. It is virtue signaling on a global scale. It never looks at consequences or reactions. Disaster tends to follow such people.
@felippogaglianoneneto6214 ай бұрын
Stoicism is very popular today, but i really don't know why, because it is christian ethics without God. Justin Martyr already said that in 150AD, in his dialogue with Trypho, that stoicism is worthless in knowing about God, because it teaches that believing in Him is unnecessary. And, without believing in God, there is no reason to seek a virtuous life, unless you're doing it for self gratification. Stoics just end up being self-centered and self-worshiping people, and i'm not saying that is your case, i'm just saying this is what the philosophy leads us to believe.
@UrbanBard14 ай бұрын
@@felippogaglianoneneto621 It's not that simple; I don't see it as a replacement for Christianity. Christ is my first go to. Sadly, people will try to manipulate you, if you let them. What do you do when you have turned your cheek and been slapped again? Clearly, this advice doesn't always work. Especially, when they also ridicule you. So, you look for something else. Stoicism is a philosophy for how to deal with the world of imperfect men. It can be seen as an ancient form of political science. In large part, it is about controlling oneself and lessoning one's expectations. People will let you down. It teaches us to avoid self sabotage through a lack of restraint. Throughout history, men have claimed to embrace God, but committed the most terrible atrocities. I am presently viewing a "Brief history of the English monarchs." I have to shake my head at these monarch's blindness and selfishness. They were nominal Christians, but hardly real ones. www.youtube.com/@BriefHistoryOfficial/videos If you plan to become an anchorite, then you have no need for Stoicism. If you look forward to involving yourself in commerce, then, knowledge of how to avoid errors can be valuable. It's the same reason a person should read history. You can learn much from the mistakes of others. Stoicism is a 2500 year old record of other people's mistakes.
@felippogaglianoneneto6214 ай бұрын
@@UrbanBard1 but that is exactly the point, christianity is about being slapped on the face and turning the other cheek again and again. That is why following Jesus is so hard, you'll need to be a boy scout if you want to be a christian, and not every person wants to be like that.
@bryantstudentd383129 күн бұрын
@@UrbanBard1No matter how great your sins are the blood of Christ is greater. Even though you and I both are not deserving of Christ's love He gives it to us all the same.
@vortigan90686 ай бұрын
49:08 lmfao rudy is really something
@barrackobama24226 ай бұрын
Arf Arf Arf! That was so fuckin random it was funny
@94sweetgoats525 ай бұрын
yeah that killed me lol
@skyhighstax4 ай бұрын
I am not religious but I do understand the importance of religion in society. We are doomed without it
@m3c4nyku434 ай бұрын
Then you're a doomed individual.
@HunnysPlaylists4 ай бұрын
@@m3c4nyku43 The Church, and only The Church could, Created ALL you know, don't know, and take for granted. without your Remaining Catholic Capital you lose it ALL.
@m3c4nyku434 ай бұрын
@@HunnysPlaylists bro he said he's "not religious". Say that to him. These type of people who say "I'm not religious but we need religion" are on a high horse and believe themselves superior to the average person and they think they don't need religion but it's good to keep the cattle in check, that's their belief system. I used his own words to point out the hypocrisy. And if we're to split hairs, it's not the Church that created everything, it's God. He created the Church.
@danielwatcherofthelord18236 ай бұрын
The Sadducees were a sect and also there were the scribes who were in alignment with the Pharisees, but had a different role in the religous structure. And lastly, the Herodians were aligned with the state and Roman state influence, possibly Greek also but not completely sure on that.
@charliedontsurf3345 ай бұрын
They weren't really in alignment. They were quasi-theological liberals who only accepted the Torah/Pentateuch as scripture.
@pre-debutera69415 ай бұрын
You have a bad habit of presenting theories as fact
@johnnyboy25375 ай бұрын
The pattern I've noticed with him is that he usually nails the overall picture but misses or gets details wrong that can mess up the point he's trying to make if you know more about the subject than he does. Still worth listening to though.
@thorpeaaron11105 ай бұрын
From an apocalyptic Jewish preacher to world religion Christianity has had quite the ride. Your talking about the Sadduces.
@TheGreenKnight5005 ай бұрын
@@thorpeaaron1110 It's crazy how it started off as a lunatic cult that preached the world was ending in everyone's lifetime. It was a genuine lunatic cult and Christians have tried really hard to make people forget that. I think Christianity became less psycho only because it became Europeanized and had Greek and Roman values put into it. If it remained strictly Middle Eastern, it would likely be just like Islam and be the source of mass terrorism.
@northidahoshorts6 ай бұрын
Love your channel god bless. Do a video on the early church schisms
@cupholderincorporated5 ай бұрын
30:04 I think you need to watch some inspiring philosophy videos as inspiring philosophy debunks all of those fabricated myths by atheists to diss Christs word
@deirdrecarney70934 ай бұрын
Excellent video that perfectly expresses what a lot of us feel. It’s good to know other people feel the same.
@utarefson94 ай бұрын
The host actually talked back! Please, more of that!
@humbertosoares35634 күн бұрын
Love your videos. Keep up the good work.
@synth4045 ай бұрын
Let's do Mezopotamia next, maybe one day peloponnesian wars or the different crusader Knight orders
@ikengaspirit30635 ай бұрын
30:03 our first source of the mitra/sol Invictus on December 25th literally post-dates the first source for christmas on that date. So, no, it isn't adopted from a dif religion.
@feliciaf84 ай бұрын
yep this one irks me, and also the eucharist too
@ikengaspirit30634 ай бұрын
@@feliciaf8 I think the Eucharist stuff comes from moderns being unable to understand how people can have altered state of consciousness experiences without drugs and how people can believe in the supernatural as much as they believe in the natural. It's why they come up with so many ridiculous explanations to explain away the resurrection while there's more realistic explanations of they either just believe it or look at how people that still believe in the supernatural today in semi-modern countries, act around miracle.
@jonbenson61095 ай бұрын
Christ is King!
@MidwestArtMan5 ай бұрын
"A bunch of working-class multi-racial people taking psychedelics." That's literally Joe Rogan's audience.
@feliciaf84 ай бұрын
even tho its not true at all in regards to psychedelics
@us3rG2 ай бұрын
Christianity needs your mind to be clear.
@us3rG2 ай бұрын
Adam was created masculine in God image, sbove emotions in perfect peace woth love and wisdom Eve is life, Nature, mother of all living, everything feminine and part Adam Masculine for women is like light for a plant. They thrive and became full of life Christian in its pure form is the natural order God Christ Man Woman Children Love is from above This is why fathers are important
@dolphadomian47624 ай бұрын
Correction: Armenia was the First Nation to convert to Christianity
@Petrusanak6 ай бұрын
The Edict of Serdica in 311 AD/CE forbade the persecution of Christians in the Empire The Edict of Milan in 313 AD/CE legalized Christianity as one of the religions of the Empire The Edict of Thessalonica in 380 AD/CE made Christianity the State Religion of the Empire
@BABYPOP0286 ай бұрын
Some Gregorian chant music in the beginning would have set the mood a bit more proper
@Mcfunface5 ай бұрын
Maybe some polyphony too
@HunnysPlaylists4 ай бұрын
The Holiness would repel his unforgivable blasphemies.
@RockawayCCW2 ай бұрын
The book at 54:55 is Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years by Diarmaid MacCulloch
@declanodenki97286 ай бұрын
9:03 can you please provide some sources of Roman or Greek authors saying things like I don’t believe in the Gods?
@notsocrates95296 ай бұрын
"No. Don't think I will." 🥄👨🏻🍼
@Chris-es3wf5 ай бұрын
@@declanodenki9728 His point was that most bureaucratic classes provided lip service to the Gods but weren't religious. Consider politicians today. Even today almost no politician would say they are atheist, despite no one actually believing these politicians are at all religious. Similar concept. E.g. Biden is a Catholic, but is ok with abortion. Ted Cruz says he's a Christian but clearly is not. Etc.
@georgios_53424 ай бұрын
Iota in Greek doesn't mean nothing, it is a letter of the alphabet, basically the debate was about a part of the Nicene Creed, that described Jesus as having equal value to God the Father (omoousios), but some heretics thought it was of similar value (omoiousios)
@HunnysPlaylists4 ай бұрын
if reddit was a video. The Church Spread Two Ways: 1) Miraculously, 2) Bld Of Martyrs. unforgivable blaspheming wont change that.
@simmat64196 ай бұрын
Christianty, my favorite religion!
@gregorylatta81595 ай бұрын
My only religion!
@AMRARDvermebrungruppe6 ай бұрын
21:00 Ruddy comes really close to explaining that the Grateful Dead is what the early church looked like
@aasifazimabadi7865 ай бұрын
It's interesting how Professor Lynch keeps referencing the video on the late Roman Empire (which is natural, as that was produced first), but I am binge-watching from the History 102 playlist that has re-arranged topics in chronological order. As per the playlist, I'm going to watch "Explaining the Fall of Rome" next.
@brycetheice79086 ай бұрын
Where are you getting your gnostic history from? I’ve done some light research and it usually states that it started as a twisted branch of Christianity with many different versions like Sethians first appearing in either the 1st or 2nd centuries. Not saying that’s correct just wondering where you got the Iraqi origins from
@tianming49646 ай бұрын
I'm assuming he's saying the dualistic elements of Persian religions particularly Zoroastrianism (which mostly were present in Iraq at that time) influenced gnostic elements in Christianity.
@azlyri5 ай бұрын
In Iraq they are known for their witchcraft and their gold trade.
@ikengaspirit30635 ай бұрын
Nah, what's i've read as well is that gnostic cosmology of the world that all gnostic groups have to be really considered gnostic, pre-existed Christianity.
@felippogaglianoneneto6214 ай бұрын
The real origin of gnosticism according to tradition was Simon the sorcerer, who tried to buy the Holy Ghost's power from Peter and John, as stated on the Acts of the Apostles, chapter 8. He was samaritan. He started teaching it as the "true" gospel of Christ, and his teachings became very popular on the Middle East from the first century AD. John even fought some of his disciples, once again according to tradition.
@tomislav0785 ай бұрын
Those videos are awesome! Could you make them alot longer? I could listen to them for hours
@lostcauselancer3336 ай бұрын
“Iota” isn’t a Greek word, it’s a Greek letter, and it’s the difference between “homoousian” and “homo*I*ousian,” (same substance/different substance). It’s a serious theological debate over the trinity and whether Christ is divine.
@Peak_Aussieman6 ай бұрын
What a co-inky-dink I was just reminiscing on your How Christianity Changed History video.
@Peak_Aussieman6 ай бұрын
@@CmdrDingus As Written...
@tuckerbugeater5 ай бұрын
The Jews created Christianity and it changed people not the other way around
@Xairos846 ай бұрын
Judea was to Rome what Gaza is to Israel today. Strange to say...
@LilgaevOfficial5 ай бұрын
Very accurate
@shaulkofler32475 ай бұрын
This is a factually incorrect statement. Also you unknowingly inferred that the jews had a historical homeland and therefore your statement makes even less sense
@hjs9td5 ай бұрын
The problem with this analysis is that Rome respected religions older than their own. The Jews were given exemptions from Roman religious laws. Despite this, the Jews chafed at Roman rule because they still had to answer to Rome rather than God.
@Interne738594 ай бұрын
The Jews just had anger issues
@steambub5 ай бұрын
Can you please list the book recommendations in the description. It's hard to read the author and title of these books from a webcam.
@SmittywebenjägermanjensenАй бұрын
It’s safe to say modern Christianity is the culmination of paganisric rituals and festivals and materialistic contrivances that overall throughout the millennia has completely lost the plot. But the coping from modern Christians, who seem to not represent or inhabit any of Christ’s supposed behaviors and beliefs, does nothing to exemplify him en masse and revert to memic exclamations while convulsing with hatred for those who disagree with their philosophy. Honestly quite sad at the state of Christianity today
@skivvy3565Ай бұрын
Thank you rudyard, this comment section is proof people don’t even understand our own religion
@WizzaStrap6 ай бұрын
What is the name of the Jewish rabbi from 23:40?
@דניאל-ש2ה5 ай бұрын
Rabbi Hilel
@antonivsfortis24 күн бұрын
11:55 Ideologically Jesus was more aligned with the Pharisees actually, especially the school of Hilel. Though he did give the Pharisees the most grief over specifics of Jewish law, it was more like two schools of thought fighting each other specifically the opposing School of Shammai. In the way that Jesus was in dialogue with these Jewish teachers it was actually pretty typical of the time. This is something a theologically educated Jewish audience would be able to capture in regard to the stories of Jesus interacting with rabbis and teachers of the law, very difficult for your traditional Christian audience to grasp because they will tend to just hear the term Pharisee and think it is a synonym for hypocrite.
@AverageYoutubeEnthusiast5 ай бұрын
I like when minions start singing at the end of the intro
@aaronfredrickson95385 ай бұрын
Illumination. Hehehe
@CmdrDingus6 ай бұрын
If you haven't done so yet you should do a rise of Judaism video
@TheGreenKnight5005 ай бұрын
@@CmdrDingus it's never risen. It's always been a minority religion.
@burneraccount1225 ай бұрын
Been a big fan for a couple years now. Id love to see you do a history video on the early church schisms please.
@PvtSchlock4 ай бұрын
2:09 So like Decca Records? I believe a senior exec said the market was moving away from "guitar oriented rock music".
@RockawayCCW2 ай бұрын
One theory is that Paul co-opted christianity and turned it into a Roman tax collection agency.
@caleb36395 ай бұрын
just so you know, Christianity started in the garden
@jonathanh54054 ай бұрын
Referring to 10:30 - The Jews revolted because Semitics have an ethno-religious world view (until today), the Romans thought sacrificing to the Emperor means you show loyalty to the Empire, to the Jews it is worshiping a man, which is a very big no-no and has NOTHING to do with secular loyalty which they had no issue with, it's a misunderstanding between different cultures (in Judaism you have only 3 sins for which you should refuse performing even onto death - incest, murder, foreign worship - even in the holocaust you have Jews refusing to kill, even when they know it means they or/and their family immediately being shot in the head for refusing, the Romans put an altar in the holiest of holies in the temple, of course this would bring endless Jewish revolts). Jew and Israeli here
@MeanBeanComedy5 ай бұрын
Peasants weren't afraid of the Eucharist because it was somehow psychedelic. They were afraid from the rhetoric, yet people still sometimes broke in and stole the wine anyhow.
@weldcrafted3434 ай бұрын
Can you make a video about each religious view on women?
@hardwing5 ай бұрын
Such a great episode! Still I would have wished for a small tour to the great christian shisms/schools of the beginning, like Arianism and their extend ... I mean wouldn't it make Middle/Eastern Europe christian before the arrival of the huns? Could Persia have converted in time if not for the rise of Islam? Etc. ...The Christian world nearly was much larger and different in the beginning.
@cmontera19794 ай бұрын
What was the psychedelic in the eucharist?
@ElvargsBane5 ай бұрын
We do need a consistent worldview for the right. Christianity is one present and (I'm biased as a Christian) but it is a pretty good to follow and end up with.
@Cgl3g3nd6 ай бұрын
You didn’t mention Alexandria
@vorynrosethorn903Ай бұрын
The word you were looking for throughout this was deracinated. Also no, early Christianity immediately swept up a whole bunch of Greco-Roman intellectuals who had reasoned themselves into monotheism, thus there was an extremely heavy influence of Hellenistic philosophy from very near the start. It did not stay contained at all, it exploded outwards as the apostles scattered to plant the seeds in every corner of the known world, and often to directly bare witness to the faith through martyrdom.
@lawrencek19005 ай бұрын
Glamorgan was the first Christian Kingdom circa AD 36, then to Rome with its invasion, with King Caratacus's speech to the Roman senate still extant - 1st Century AD
@jasonpalacios13636 ай бұрын
I say you should do the Spanish-American War, the US Westward Expansion, The American Revolution, The War of 1812 and the Spanish Reconquista.
@mrfawkes91103 ай бұрын
Prestor John wasn't supposed to be an Empire but an Emperor. It was more likely that it was Ghengis Khan than Ethiopia.
@bettyhade18443 ай бұрын
Tom Holland and Rodney Stark are good reading. The lost history of Christianity tells the story of the Nestorians. Christianity spread along coastal cities, mainly in the Mediterranean. It grew because they reproduced and persevered better than polytheistic groups. Constantine converted Christianity into the Roman state religion. The Byzantines were constantly fighting wars against heretics on all sides. On the west the goths were christianized barbarians who split off the Roman empire into independent pieces. The Byzantine wars to the east lead to the eventual collapse of the Zoroastrian Persians, and also famine and plaque, out of which the Arab warlords gained control, their vague monotheism (more tolerant at least than the Byzantines) eventually being transformed into Islam (which basically gave license to pillage and enslave in the name of religion. By 950, Christianity in Europe was sandwiched between Islam in the south and Viking pagans to the north. But the monks convinced the castellans and knights to not rape/pillage their own people, and the serfs were able to produce wealth with wind, horse, and water power. The Viking kings converted because in large measure it was more profitable. The crusades represented a belated counterattack after the north was no longer the same threat. Europe prospered creating universities, literate populations, and capitalism. Utilizing gunpowder, movable type, and the ability to navigate the oceans. Europe used guns, the printing press, and ships to dominate other continents. Initial efforts by royals and religious nonconformists were taken over by joint stock corporations, which made enormous profits for the kings and a new middle class, but also were amoral, using slavery and drug trading as part of the colonial project. The rising middle class eventually won freedom from state control, and eventually slavery was largely defeated and political rights for the powerless established. Today the question is who will control cyberspace, and thus whether we have free spread of information. Christianity is well positioned for this future.
@andyg76935 ай бұрын
Hi Rudyard, regarding your opening statement about pontius Pilate, you might enjoy The Master and Margarita by Mikhail Bulgakov
@stevenl17065 ай бұрын
An unbeliever in the gospel of Jesus Christ and who the LORD God JEHOVAH “explaining Christianity.” The Bible says that the natural man (someone not born again in Christ) receiveth NOT the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness unto him, neither can he know them, *because they are spiritually discerned* so let an actual Bible believing Christian explain Christianity please. You literally said that God incarnate was just going around saying “love is the answer to the universe” like dude please leave this subject to those who have the Holy Ghost. 20:39 where did this happen in recorded Scripture? Chapter and verse please.
@Bogfrog16 ай бұрын
I strongly recommend you read The Passion of Perpetua and Felicity to learn a cool story about the persecution of Roman Christians. The parables of the Desert Fathers is also an amazing read. St Anselm’s “Proslogium” is a beautiful (yet also wordy) proof of God. St Francis of Assisi also has some beautiful poems about God and nature.
@steambub5 ай бұрын
Who's the author for Christianity book at 54:54 ?
@QuizmasterLaw6 ай бұрын
Because of Rudyard Lynch I started writing popular books about society, for example The Tao of Christ: Understanding Chinese Religions in Comparison with Christianity (by Eric Engle). Thank you Rudyard! (or, if you prefer, Mr. Lynch)
@WhatifAltHist6 ай бұрын
Fr
@QuizmasterLaw5 ай бұрын
@@WhatifAltHist If you mean for real" yes in fact. Basically your method is interesting and unique, you look at history both as facts and as various conflicting emotional drives, and with a moral perspective without being moralistic. That's definitely unique. Most of your analysis is qualititative, rather thant quantitative, which is a point to criticize, and when you do get quantitative (Spengler) it's determinist and insufficiently deep to be taken seriously. Macrocyclicity isn't even understood well in economics, where people have money riding on predictions and so consider the question of cyclicity much more intensely. Regarding the rise of Christianity, I shall watch it again, though I don't think you brought out the deliberate christianization of the empire to impose unity sufficiently. Caesar and Christ were nearly contemporaries and both claimed to be god, which is a fact modernity also ignores. Good arguments can be made for Christianity as a covert Caesarism and the empire absolutely needed something to keep all those disparate nations together. I was surprised that as man as 14% of the empire were Jews though I still think its overcounting and wonder how well founded that stat is. I do take your word for it and can understand that after the mass murder of lots of jews that their % dwindled.
@angadgrewal93246 ай бұрын
could you do a video on Sikhism and the mongol empire?
@hardyje19155 ай бұрын
timestamps?
@DFMoray4 ай бұрын
He was and is the son of God, not a carpenter's son.
@cefalopodo57176 ай бұрын
Can you please do one on the French Revolution?
@yakov950005 ай бұрын
Very Intresting video from outsider perspective(not Roman and not Christian),still I really love this time period in history. Btw The Rabbi that you mentioning that said "Love your nighbour as you love yourself,this is the entire Torah the rest is commentary" is Rabbi Hillel the Elder(I think he died around 10CE). Hillel was Babylonian Jew not Roman, poor farmer and direct decedent of David line(later the leader of Sanhedrin),who was almost killed as kid climbing the window above Jerusalem Synagogue buried under snow as he wanted to study Jewish laws but didn't have the money. The main reason he is famous is his argument with another famous Rabbi and Av Beit Din(Shammai)which was another leader of Sanhedrin and strick legalist(those are the most famous arguments in entire Talmud)Hillel vs Shammai. One example of thier argument is "what do you say to ugly bride on wedding day"(how and when are you allowed to lie to person)Shammai say that you have to tell the truth as Torah commands and hiding from her will not help,while Hillel said "there is no ugly bride on her wedding day" or what you mentioned before gentile comes to Rabbis asking them to explain the whole Torah while he is standing on one leg(what is the main point),Shammai kicked him out and said that honor of Torah doesn't allow this simplicity and needs to be explored while Hillel says like I wrote before loving the nighbour is main lesson.
@WhatifAltHist5 ай бұрын
Very cool. Thank you
@shaulkofler32475 ай бұрын
Waiting on history of Judaism, jews and Israel.
@Mcfunface5 ай бұрын
44:30 Arianism says Jesus was Divine, just that he was also created by God the Father. Since Nicenian Creed followers had to do the mental gymnastics claiming a concept as absurd as the Trinity (three Gods in one essence) they could not allow Arian Christianity to compete with their compromise made in the Council of Nicea
@sponge51965 ай бұрын
Tbh, Arianism makes a lot more sense...early Christianity is wild.
@ITSMRFOXY5 ай бұрын
This is justified with the old testament, wherein god does not have a creator, and can manifest his essence on earth as the burning bush, or as the angel of the lord, yet not being the same person as god, therefore the trinity can work.
@lucasgonzalez9668Ай бұрын
The Trinity is the correct understanding of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Any other interpretation risks being heretical and not Christian.
@agelesscuriosity59972 ай бұрын
Did he start "arf" around minute 47?
@mikaelbohman66945 ай бұрын
I much prefer your regular, more structured whatifalthistory episodes. These are too rambling and have the maybe inevitable inaccuracies of a spoken format.
@GnosticInformant5 ай бұрын
Gessius Florus was told by Nero to take money from the Temple of Jerusalem and they revolted. They weren't just "being like the Irish". Also, the Pharisees were the Hellenized group and the Sadducees were the older, more conservative law-keeping sect.
@cordellharwood73634 ай бұрын
Yo Neal love your stuff bro Hail Satan
@HunnysPlaylists4 ай бұрын
@@cordellharwood7363 your curses are Consummately Returned.
@HunnysPlaylists4 ай бұрын
@@cordellharwood7363 By My Final Authority you and ALL those l1ke you are Hereby Marked In Full.
@felippogaglianoneneto6214 ай бұрын
12:32 they were called sadducees.
@reeldeelz29406 ай бұрын
Jesus was taken out basically because the messenger got bigger than the message a la Malcom X..
@ziondelima51366 ай бұрын
Please interview and talk to Mark Moss. He has interesting insights and theories about different cycles like the one's you talk about in your videos.
@carlossaborio67166 ай бұрын
Jesus considered himself a Jew, he did not create Christianity as a new religion. Historically that goes to the first pope (Peter) who wanted to differentiate Jesus’ philosophy in order for it to not get lost to the sands of time.
@JacobFraps6 ай бұрын
Christianity is about Jesus Christ
@Fenster215 ай бұрын
Yes, he did as the messiah predicted by the Torah. “Christianity” is the fullfillment/continuation of Hebrew scripture while post-Jesus Judaism is the schism that rejects the messiah.
@thorpeaaron11105 ай бұрын
@@Fenster21The Historical Jesus never attended to start a new religion.
@carlossaborio67165 ай бұрын
@@Fenster21 Jesus stated himself that his teachings were in accordance with the torah. Christ never stablished his own separate church from the Jews during his lifetime. Christianity as a codified religion separate from Judaism began with Peter. Jesus was a jew and Christian’s seem unable to accept that fact and their cognitive dissonance is astounding. The lack of a logical revision of Christianity is just gonna lead to the belief system to crumble like it’s has over the last 2 centuries.
@Fenster215 ай бұрын
@carlossaborio6716 that's what I'm saying. Jesus was a continuation of Judaism, a fulfillment of the prophesies. Rabbinical "judaism" is a schism off this that reject the Messiah. Christianity is just a renaming of Mosiac Judaism not some separate contrived religion.
@johnmorrison28944 ай бұрын
He speaks of Christ like he wasn’t actually God 😢
@Istobias2 ай бұрын
Because he isnt Christian
@gussampson502927 күн бұрын
Please at least say the author's name and the book title. Showing it from two feet away on a less than amazing video camera is not conducive to actually finding the book.